03.01.2015 Views

Role of Hydropower in Austria - Events

Role of Hydropower in Austria - Events

Role of Hydropower in Austria - Events

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CIS Workshop „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong>, 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Role</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hydropower</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Austria</strong><br />

Veronika Koller-Kreimel<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry for Agriculture & Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Vienna - <strong>Austria</strong><br />

Hier steht e<strong>in</strong> thematisches Foto<br />

Seite 1 06.06.2007


Ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics:<br />

- alp<strong>in</strong>e (precipitation, <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

- primary energy resource:<br />

no oil, gas or coal -<br />

only hydropower (renewable!)<br />

- <strong>in</strong>land country<br />

(high transport prices)<br />

Seite 2<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW


Electricity generation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Austria</strong><br />

About 2/3 is generated by hydropower.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 2002 the proportion <strong>of</strong> hp generation decreased due to higher<br />

consumption, climatic reasons àhigher use <strong>of</strong> caloric generation<br />

Electricity production <strong>in</strong> <strong>Austria</strong> 2004<br />

total generation 2004: 64.000 GWh<br />

hydropower<br />

generation<br />

others*<br />

39,0%<br />

large hp<br />

54,5%<br />

large hp<br />

small hp<br />

others<br />

‣ base load<br />

‣ peak load<br />

‣ ancillary services<br />

6,5%<br />

small hp<br />

source: E-control<br />

*caloric, w<strong>in</strong>d, solar, etc.<br />

hp……….. hydropower<br />

Seite 3<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW


Structure <strong>of</strong> hydropower generation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Austria</strong><br />

maximum<br />

capacity<br />

No <strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

total No<br />

GWh<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

total hp gen<br />

small<br />

hydropower<br />

< 200 kW<br />

200 - 500 kW<br />

500 kW–1 MW<br />

1442<br />

292<br />

184<br />

63<br />

13<br />

8<br />

337<br />

385<br />

468<br />

0,8<br />

0,9<br />

1,1<br />

1 – 2 MW<br />

118<br />

5<br />

598<br />

1,4<br />

2 – 5 MW<br />

73<br />

3<br />

745<br />

1,8<br />

5 – 10 MW<br />

34<br />

1<br />

881<br />

2,1<br />

total<br />

2143<br />

93<br />

3414<br />

8,1<br />

large hp<br />

> 10 MW<br />

156<br />

7<br />

38000<br />

91<br />

TOTAL<br />

2299*<br />

100<br />

41000<br />

100<br />

* > 2000 very small plants (only private supply) to be added<br />

storage power plants<br />

run-<strong>of</strong>-river power stations<br />

1 2


<strong>Hydropower</strong> Potential<br />

gross theorethical potential …..150.000 GWh<br />

estimated realistic/feasible potential …. 56.000 - 60.000 GWh<br />

- already used/generated ………….… about 70%<br />

What about the other 30%<br />

• valuable renewable energy<br />

• strict requirement (EU, national goverment) to <strong>in</strong>crease energy<br />

generation from renewables for CO2-reduction<br />

• what does it mean for water ecology (WFD objectives)<br />

Seite 5<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW


Art. 5 Results - Risk Assessment rivers > 100 km 2<br />

no risk<br />

16%<br />

at risk 60%<br />

24% possibly<br />

at risk<br />

hydropeak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

3.148 migration barriers …...... 1 / 3,5 km<br />

hydropower (1/3)……..…1 / 10 km<br />

575 backwater > 500 m ………...1 / 20 km<br />

• no ecological m<strong>in</strong> flow<br />

(water diversion for HP)….…1 / 16 km<br />

• sections <strong>in</strong>fluenced by hydropeak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Seite 6<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW


Outcome <strong>of</strong> the Art. 5 report with respect<br />

to hydropower<br />

‣ restauration measures<br />

have to be carried out<br />

• <strong>in</strong>vestment cost<br />

• reduction/impact on<br />

power generation<br />

‣ to restore cont<strong>in</strong>uity (fish ladders, …)<br />

‣ to provide egological m<strong>in</strong>imum flow<br />

‣ to <strong>in</strong>crease habitat diversity<br />

‣ to m<strong>in</strong>imise water level fluctions<br />

Seite 7<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW


WFD implications on <strong>Austria</strong>n hydropower<br />

Source: Stigler et al. (2005)<br />

http://gpool.lfrz.at/gpoolexport/media/file/Auswirkungen_WRRL_auf_Wasserkraft-Studie.pdf<br />

restauration <strong>of</strong> river cont<strong>in</strong>uity<br />

Investment costs:<br />

‣ small hydropower………… ca. 90 Mio €<br />

‣ large hydropower……… 60 -144 Mio €<br />

Seite 8<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW


WFD implications on <strong>Austria</strong>n hydropower<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ecological m<strong>in</strong>imum flow<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> power generation<br />

with respect to<br />

hp sector hp sector total hp generation<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial loss<br />

small hp < 10 MW ………. 10 - 32 % * 1,0 - 3,0% 15-50 Mio €/a<br />

large hp > 10 MW….…….... 5 - 20 % 0,4 - 1,5 % 4-16 Mio €/a<br />

storage pp** …..………….2,8 – 10,2 % 0,7 - 2,5 % ** .<br />

total 2,1 – 7 %<br />

** also loss <strong>of</strong> peak load and ancillary services<br />

Remark: „worst case“ estimation<br />

Compensation <strong>of</strong> losses by technical optimisation measures was<br />

not taken account!<br />

Seite 9<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW


WFD implications on <strong>Austria</strong>n hydropower<br />

Reduction <strong>of</strong> water level fluctuations<br />

‣ build<strong>in</strong>g compensation reservoirs (availability <strong>of</strong> land<br />

‣ transferr<strong>in</strong>g the discharge <strong>in</strong>to a larger river<br />

à <strong>in</strong>vestment costs<br />

‣ chang<strong>in</strong>g the operational mode<br />

à loss <strong>of</strong> ancillary services<br />

à loss <strong>of</strong> peak load<br />

---- extreme f<strong>in</strong>ancial losses!<br />

(example: one company 80 Mio €/a)<br />

Seite 10<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW


Constra<strong>in</strong>ts to further development <strong>of</strong> hp plants<br />

How to solve the conflict between WFD and CO 2 reduction<br />

‣ large hp: no/low acceptance for new plants by the public;<br />

even there is no specific higher damage <strong>of</strong> water ecology compared to small hp<br />

‣ small hp: <strong>in</strong> additon to the exist<strong>in</strong>g 4200 GWh another 4500 GWh ere<br />

expected to be generated by build<strong>in</strong>g new plants.<br />

Do we expect to build additional 2000 small hp plants lead<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />

high amount <strong>of</strong> impacted water bodies (backwater, reduced cont<strong>in</strong>uity)<br />

+ Result <strong>of</strong> Art.5 report: only few water bodies left with „near natural“ conditions;<br />

there is a specific stress to be used for small hp generation (à plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> „go“<br />

and „no go“ areas<br />

+ How we can ensure that exist<strong>in</strong>g plants are technically optimised /old<br />

structures rebuilt before before build<strong>in</strong>g new plants<br />

Seite 11<br />

CIS-WS „WFD & <strong>Hydropower</strong>“, Berl<strong>in</strong> , 4-5 June 2007<br />

<strong>Austria</strong>/ Koller-Kreimel, BMLFUW

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!