04.01.2015 Views

Exemption needed The need for exemptions - Ecologic Events

Exemption needed The need for exemptions - Ecologic Events

Exemption needed The need for exemptions - Ecologic Events

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>need</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>exemptions</strong><br />

<strong>Exemption</strong> <strong><strong>need</strong>ed</strong><br />

<strong>Exemption</strong> <strong><strong>need</strong>ed</strong><br />

<strong>Exemption</strong> <strong><strong>need</strong>ed</strong>


WE DON’T EXPECT MANY<br />

APPLICATIONS NEEDING AN<br />

EXEMPTION<br />

USE PRE-APPLICATION<br />

DISCUSSIONS – HELP AVOID SUCH<br />

APPLICATIONS<br />

HANDLE IN A CONSISTENT AND<br />

TRANSPARENT WAY


EXEMPTION TESTS


<strong>The</strong> exemption<br />

tests<br />

Have all practicable mitigation<br />

measures been included in the<br />

proposal<br />

Will the benefits resulting from<br />

the proposal outweigh those<br />

lost<br />

Is there a significantly better<br />

environmental option<br />

Will the obligations of other<br />

EU legislation be met


Familiar process – used in EIA<br />

Focused on factors likely to be<br />

significantly impacted<br />

Advice from Responsible<br />

Authorities and other public bodies


1. Will the benefits<br />

resulting from the<br />

proposal outweigh<br />

those lost


Human health<br />

Human safety<br />

Sustainable development<br />

Overriding public interest


Factors we will take into account in impact assessments<br />

Economic impacts<br />

Direct - Scottish economy<br />

Indirect - third party<br />

businesses<br />

Health<br />

Safety<br />

Social impacts<br />

Recreation<br />

Nuisance<br />

Vulnerable/<br />

disadvantaged groups<br />

Environmental<br />

impacts<br />

Water environment<br />

Biodiversity<br />

Landscape<br />

Energy<br />

Built heritage<br />

Earth heritage<br />

Waste and resource<br />

use


Ranking the significance of a +ve or -ve impact<br />

Importance<br />

of impacted<br />

factor<br />

Very Low<br />

Low<br />

Magnitude of impact<br />

Moderate<br />

High<br />

Very High<br />

Local<br />

VL<br />

VL<br />

L<br />

M<br />

M – H<br />

Regional<br />

VL<br />

L<br />

M<br />

M - H<br />

H<br />

National<br />

VL<br />

L-M<br />

H<br />

H-VH<br />

VH<br />

International<br />

L<br />

M-H<br />

H - VH<br />

VH<br />

VH


Is there a significantly<br />

better environmental<br />

option


Is this the right<br />

place <strong>for</strong> the<br />

development


Other sites where activity would not<br />

cause deterioration of status<br />

<strong>The</strong> site is particularly important and<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e the impacts of the activity<br />

would be significantly greater than<br />

under other options


Summary - recap<br />

• Status deterioration - exemption tests required<br />

• 4 exemption tests:<br />

• Mitigation<br />

• Benefits of development<br />

• Better environmental option<br />

• Other legislation<br />

• Assessment framework - simple, logical and<br />

familiar<br />

• Judgements – transparent and objective<br />

• Case studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!