Discussion Paper - Law Reform Commission of Western Australia
Discussion Paper - Law Reform Commission of Western Australia
Discussion Paper - Law Reform Commission of Western Australia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Other issues<br />
6.31 The <strong>Commission</strong> has noted a number <strong>of</strong> areas that may be the subject <strong>of</strong><br />
submissions, or may be desirable improvements on Part IVA. Issues upon which the<br />
<strong>Commission</strong> invites interested parties to comment upon include:<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D<br />
The possible need for codification <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the representative plaintiff<br />
and requirements for removal <strong>of</strong> a representative plaintiff: see [3.25]–[3.28].<br />
The suspension <strong>of</strong> limitation periods and the status <strong>of</strong> class members’ claims<br />
in the event a class is disbanded by order <strong>of</strong> the court: see[4.4].<br />
Whether there should be a more prescriptive legislative framework in relation<br />
to security for costs in representative proceedings: see [3.48]–[3.54].<br />
Whether the impact <strong>of</strong> proportionate liability legislation as enshrined in<br />
the Civil Liability Act (WA) could produce anomalous results in relation to<br />
the issue <strong>of</strong> whether every group member must have a claim against each named<br />
respondent: see [3.37]–[3.40] and [4.15]–[4.17].<br />
E<br />
In relation to notification to claimants giving them the ability to opt out<br />
<strong>of</strong> a representative proceeding, are more prescriptive provisions required in<br />
order to ensure class members are aware <strong>of</strong> their right to opt out <strong>of</strong> a representative<br />
proceeding: see [4.29]–[4.40].<br />
F<br />
Section 33V in its current form contains no statutory guidance or criteria that<br />
a court should take into account when considering whether to approve the<br />
settlement or discontinuance <strong>of</strong> an action: see [4.41]–[4.47]. Should the provision<br />
in its present form be amended to include formal criteria a court should take into<br />
account when deciding to approve the finalisation <strong>of</strong> a representative proceeding<br />
Should interested parties feel that other issues relating to the current composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> Part IVA proceedings be brought to the attention <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Commission</strong>, they are<br />
encouraged to make submissions in relation to same.<br />
Submissions to the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />
6.32 Submissions may be made by telephone, fax, letter or email to the address<br />
below. Those who wish to request a meeting with the <strong>Commission</strong> may telephone<br />
for an appointment.<br />
<strong>Law</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australia</strong><br />
Level 3, BGC Centre<br />
28 The Esplanade, Perth WA 6000<br />
Telephone: (08) 9321 4833<br />
Facsimile: (08) 9321 5833<br />
Email: lrcwa@justice.wa.gov.au<br />
Submissions received by 31 May 2013 will be considered by the <strong>Commission</strong> in the<br />
preparation <strong>of</strong> its Final Report.<br />
98 <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> – Representative Proceedings : <strong>Discussion</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>