Discussion Paper - Law Reform Commission of Western Australia
Discussion Paper - Law Reform Commission of Western Australia
Discussion Paper - Law Reform Commission of Western Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Features <strong>of</strong> the Queensland regime<br />
Commencement <strong>of</strong> proceedings<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Commission</strong> that there has been no appreciable increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
representative proceedings instituted in Queensland as a result <strong>of</strong> the change. 106<br />
3.63 The UCPR (Qld) does not provide any framework for commencement<br />
<strong>of</strong> representative proceedings; however, it is clear that two conditions must be<br />
satisfied:<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
represented parties must have the same interest; and<br />
represented parties must have been able to have been joined in the original<br />
proceeding.<br />
Appointing a representative<br />
Binding judgment<br />
3.64 As already noted, the second requirement is a departure from the earlier<br />
provisions existing in Queensland. The UCPR (Qld) provides for joinder <strong>of</strong> parties<br />
where their presence is necessary for the adjudication <strong>of</strong> all issues; where common<br />
questions <strong>of</strong> law or fact are likely to arise if separate proceedings are commenced;<br />
or where the relief sought arises out <strong>of</strong> the same transaction or event. 107 Thus, there<br />
appears to be additional emphasis on the need for commonality <strong>of</strong> interest between<br />
represented persons.<br />
3.65 Ordinarily no prior court approval is required for the appointment <strong>of</strong><br />
a representative party in Queensland. 108 Furthermore, it has been held that<br />
a representative need not identify every party who shares the same interest in a<br />
proceeding. It will be adequate that the parties be identified with sufficient<br />
particularity. 109 Where a person is suing or being sued in a representative capacity,<br />
the plaintiff or applicant must state that representative capacity on the originating<br />
process. 110<br />
3.66 The court may also authorise a representative to act on behalf <strong>of</strong> all persons<br />
in an action commenced under Rule 75 at any stage <strong>of</strong> the proceedings. The<br />
representative may be a person named in the proceeding or another person. Where<br />
the chosen representative is not named in the proceeding the court must make an<br />
order including him or her as a party. 111<br />
3.67 The unnamed persons or entities in a representative action are not parties<br />
to the proceeding. They need not consent to the institution <strong>of</strong> proceedings on<br />
their behalf and are not subject to the ordinary liabilities <strong>of</strong> litigants in respect<br />
<strong>of</strong> discovery or disclosure. 112 Nonetheless, orders and judgments in representative<br />
proceedings bind the representative party and all parties with the same interest who<br />
106. Consultation with Rod Hodson, Maurice Blackburn Queensland, 5 May 2012.<br />
107. Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) rr 62, 65.<br />
108. Minister for Industrial Development <strong>of</strong> Queensland v Taubenfeld [2003] 2 Qd R 655, 658.<br />
109. Carnie v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (1995) 182 CLR 398, 403, 408.<br />
110. Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) r 18.<br />
111. Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) rr 62, 76.<br />
112. Cameron v National Mutual Life Assn <strong>of</strong> Australasia Ltd (No 2) [1992] 1 Qd R 133, 141, 144.<br />
36 <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> – Representative Proceedings : <strong>Discussion</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>