06.01.2015 Views

Geothermal Energy - World Future Society

Geothermal Energy - World Future Society

Geothermal Energy - World Future Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

© 2012 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Society</strong> • 7910 Woodmont Ave., Suite 450, Bethesda, MD 20814, U.S.A. • www.wfs.org • All rights reserved.<br />

<strong>Geothermal</strong> <strong>Energy</strong><br />

By Gioietta Kuo<br />

Of all the energy sources used for electricity<br />

generation, renewable or not, geothermal energy<br />

is probably the most neglected and has so far commanded<br />

the least public attention. It deserves consideration,<br />

however. <strong>Geothermal</strong> energy is a sustainable<br />

fuel—in fact, an almost limitless resource.<br />

<strong>Geothermal</strong> energy is energy from the heat<br />

of the earth. Resources range from hot water and<br />

hot rocks at or near the earth’s surface, to water<br />

and rock at high temperature several kilometers<br />

deep. In theory, it is possible to tap into this resource<br />

almost everywhere, even accessing the extremely<br />

hot temperature of the magma, the earth’s<br />

molten rock core. It is particularly easy to tap this<br />

energy in countries where there is existing volcanic<br />

activity, such as the hot springs in New Zealand<br />

and Iceland.<br />

It is also very clean. The emission intensity<br />

of existing geothermal plants—most of which<br />

process hydrogen sulphide—is on average 122-<br />

400 kg of CO 2<br />

per megawatt-hour (MWh) of electricity<br />

generated. 3, 4 This is a fraction of the emission<br />

intensity of a conventional coal-fired plant,<br />

which is estimated to be around 1,000 kg per<br />

MWh.<br />

In addition, geothermal plants require minimal<br />

land and fresh water. 3 On average, a geothermal<br />

plant uses 404 square meters per GWh versus<br />

the 3,643 square meters that a coal facility uses<br />

and the 2,335 square meters that a wind farm uses.<br />

Furthermore, a geothermal plant uses only 20 liters<br />

of freshwater to produce each MWh of elec-<br />

tricity, whereas a nuclear, coal, and oil plant each<br />

uses 1,000 liters of water per MWh.<br />

Global estimates geothermal energy’s electricity-generating<br />

potential currently vary from<br />

35 to 2,000 GW. 1 The amount of heat within<br />

10,000 meters of earth’s surface contains 50,000<br />

times more energy than all the oil and natural gas<br />

resources in the world combined—enough to supply<br />

the energy needs of the whole world. 2 The current<br />

installed capacity of geothermal facilities<br />

worldwide is 10,715 MW. These facilities, generated<br />

0.07 trillion kWh of electricity in 20103. This<br />

geothermal power is produced in 24 countries.<br />

The US leads the field producing 3 GW, followed<br />

by the Philippines, Iceland, and El Salvador, each<br />

of whom produce more than 25% of their country’s<br />

electricity needs from geothermal sources. 3<br />

Yet another great advantage of geothermal<br />

generating plants is that they can generate energy<br />

24 hours a day, something otherwise possible only<br />

for nuclear and fossil fuel plants. In this sense,<br />

they are far superior to wind and solar energy systems,<br />

which both suffer from relatively low efficiency<br />

and unpredictable down times.<br />

Like with oil, the most expensive part of geothermal<br />

electricity generation is the drilling. Drilling<br />

a typical well doublet to produce 4.5 MW of<br />

electricity may cost $10 million. In total, electrical<br />

plant construction and doublet well drilling<br />

could cost $3 million-$8 million per MW of electrical<br />

capacity. How does this compare with nuclear<br />

generation plants, which are also capital-in-<br />

Gioietta Kuo is a research physicist specializing in energy problems. She has published articles in more than 70<br />

top professional journals, as well as in The People’s Daily and other widely read publications in China. She can be<br />

reached at kuopet@comcast.net.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Future</strong> Review Spring 2012 5


tensive but cost relatively little to run A standard<br />

nuclear reactor could have a capital cost of $3 billion<br />

for a 1000 MW plant, while an enhanced geothermal<br />

system (EGS) may have a capital cost of<br />

$4 million per MW.<br />

As for running costs, most of the energy costs<br />

for coal, gas, and renewables are in the range of<br />

$0.03-0.09/kWh 4 with nuclear energy toward the<br />

low end of the scale and wind and solar costing<br />

out at the high end. <strong>Geothermal</strong> EGS have an average<br />

cost of about $0.06 per kWh. However, geothermal<br />

power has the advantage that it is very<br />

scalable. A small plant might cost-effectively supply<br />

all the electricity needed to power a rural village,<br />

while nuclear and coal generation plants are<br />

only economical in larger-scale facilities producing<br />

1,000 MW or more.<br />

A development which has great potential is<br />

the direct use of the heat from<br />

shallow ground two or more<br />

meters deep which the earth<br />

maintains at a constant temperature<br />

of about 10-16° C. 5 A<br />

geothermal heat pump can tap<br />

into this resource to heat and<br />

cool buildings. The system<br />

consists of heat pump, an air<br />

delivery system (ductwork),<br />

and a heat exchanger—a system<br />

of pipes buried in the shallow<br />

ground near the building.<br />

In the winter, the heat pump<br />

removes heat from the heat exchanger<br />

and pumps it into the<br />

indoor air-delivery system. In<br />

the summer, the process is reversed: The heat<br />

pump moves heat from the indoor air into the<br />

heat exchanger.<br />

The heat removed from the indoor air can<br />

also be used to provide a free source of hot water.<br />

There are many other possible uses for this direct<br />

gentle heat, such as for greenhouses, drying crops,<br />

warming the pond water in fish farms, and in in-<br />

Figure 1. Dry Steam<br />

Power Plant<br />

Generator<br />

Turbine<br />

Ground Surface<br />

Wellhead<br />

dustrial processes such as pasteurizing milk. Since<br />

these direct heat applications can use much shallower<br />

wells and operate at lower temperatures,<br />

smaller systems with lower costs and risks are feasible.<br />

Residential geothermal heat pumps with a<br />

capacity of 10 kW are routinely installed for<br />

around $1,000-$3,000 per kW. 6 There are three<br />

basic type of geothermal power station for electricity<br />

generation depending on the depth of the<br />

well and temperature of the steam used for driving<br />

the turbines.<br />

1. Dry Steam Power Plant<br />

This is the most direct plant using steam of<br />

150° C to turn turbines. Figure 1 shows a simple<br />

system. The pipe carries cold water, which is<br />

pumped into the ground, where it is heated by<br />

running through hot rock (which has sometimes<br />

been cracked by explosives or<br />

Condenser<br />

Wellhead<br />

Explanation<br />

Water<br />

Steam<br />

Subsurface<br />

Injection<br />

highly pressurized water to facilitate<br />

the release of heat). It<br />

converts to steam and is<br />

pumped back up to the surface<br />

to drive a steam turbine. A<br />

condenser then produces water,<br />

which is returned to the<br />

ground.<br />

2. Flash Steam Power Plant<br />

Water inside a well is<br />

heated to temperatures greater<br />

than 180° C and then pumped<br />

via high pressure to generation<br />

equipment at the surface. Once<br />

the hot water reaches the generation<br />

equipment, pressure suddenly decreases,<br />

which allows some of the hot water to flash-convert<br />

to steam. This steam is then powers the turbine/generator<br />

to produce electricity. The remaining<br />

hot water is condensed from the steam and<br />

pumped back into the reservoir. The largest geothermal<br />

system in operation today is a steam<br />

driven plant located in Geysers, California.<br />

6 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Future</strong> Review Spring 2012


3. Binary Cycle Power Plant<br />

This is a recent development that can operate<br />

using fluids at temperatures as low as 58° C.<br />

It works by passing moderately hot water through<br />

a heat exchanger with a fluid that has a much<br />

lower boiling point than water. This secondary<br />

fluid flash vaporizes, which in turn drives the turbine.<br />

This is the most common type of geothermal<br />

electricity generating plant being constructed<br />

today, chiefly because it relies on relatively low<br />

temperature and requires a shallower well. Hence<br />

it has the widest potential for development.<br />

Status of <strong>Geothermal</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>World</strong>wide<br />

A new system now under development, called<br />

Enhanced <strong>Geothermal</strong> Systems (EGS), aims to capture<br />

the heat in “hot dry rock.” The hot rock reservoirs,<br />

typically situated 4-10 kilometers below the<br />

surface, are first broken up by high-pressure water<br />

that is pumped through them. The plants then pump<br />

cold water through the broken hot rocks. The cold<br />

water heats up, turns into steam, and returns to the<br />

surface, where it powers turbines. This resource has<br />

enormous potential and can be used on a much<br />

larger scale than other geothermal methods.<br />

At present, two emerging technologies are attempting<br />

to tap into the full potential of geothermal<br />

energy. EGS is one of these. The other is coproduction<br />

of geothermal electricity in oil and gas<br />

wells. Although this latter technology still needs<br />

further development, it offers a huge advantage in<br />

that the wells themselves already exist, so there is<br />

no need for capital-intensive additional drilling.<br />

Considering that geothermal energy offers<br />

practically limitless resources, why is it that the<br />

existing world production is only around 0.07 trillion<br />

kWh, or roughly 0.3% of global energy production<br />

The main reason is the high cost of drilling<br />

geothermal wells. As we know, drilling for oil<br />

has been going on for over a century, and the process<br />

has developed gradually with time. Like nuclear<br />

reactors, a typical geothermal plant requires<br />

a long lead time, taking 5-10 years to develop.<br />

Yet the advantages of geothermal energy are<br />

numerous. It is worthwhile to summarize them<br />

briefly below:<br />

• It is a limitless energy resource with no fuel<br />

costs.<br />

• As an energy baseload, it is capable of producing<br />

electricity 24 hours/day.<br />

• It produces only a small fraction of the toxic<br />

gas emissions that coal produces.<br />

• It uses a mere 12% of the land per GWh produced<br />

as coal facilities.<br />

• It uses only 20% of the water per MWh required<br />

by nuclear, coal or oil powered plants.<br />

• It is very scalable, a small plant can easily be built<br />

to supply a rural village at relatively low capital cost.<br />

• <strong>Geothermal</strong> heat is obtainable almost<br />

everywhere on earth.<br />

• Exploiting the co-generation from existing<br />

oil wells would greatly reduce drilling costs.<br />

• Heat from shallow ground has multiple industrial<br />

uses that include heating greenhouses,<br />

fish farms, pasteurizing milk, etc.<br />

• Capital cost, though high, is comparable to<br />

that required to build other energy facilities.<br />

How does geothermal energy compare with<br />

other renewable sources like wind, solar, or biofuels<br />

As noted above, geothermal offers many distinct<br />

advantages, and development costs are similar.<br />

In sum, the potential for geothermal energy is<br />

great, and it is high time we paid more attention to<br />

developing this neglected energy resource.<br />

References<br />

1. http://iga.cnr.it/documenti/IGA/Fridleifsson_et_al_<br />

IPCC_<strong>Geothermal</strong>_paper_ 2008.pdf<br />

2. http://www.uxsusa.org/clean_energy<br />

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<strong>Geothermal</strong>_electricity<br />

4. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/tech/<br />

geothermal-energy<br />

5. Knapp and Kuo, “The <strong>Future</strong> of Nuclear <strong>Energy</strong>,”<br />

Innovation and Creativity in a Complex <strong>World</strong>, <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Future</strong> <strong>Society</strong>, 2009<br />

6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<strong>Geothermal</strong>_energy<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Future</strong> Review Spring 2012 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!