07.01.2015 Views

2010 Annual Report - Grange Resources

2010 Annual Report - Grange Resources

2010 Annual Report - Grange Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 GRANGE RESOURCES LIMITED<br />

Notes to the Financial Statements (cont.)<br />

NOTE 2.<br />

FINANCIAL RISK<br />

MANAGEMENT (cont.)<br />

Going forward, the Group may consider using financial<br />

instruments to manage commodity price risk given exposures to<br />

market prices arising from recent changes to pricing<br />

mechanisms.<br />

(iii) Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk<br />

The Group’s main interest rate risk arises from long term<br />

borrowings. Borrowings are issued at variable rates exposing the<br />

Group to cash flow interest rate risk. Borrowings issued at fixed<br />

rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk if the<br />

borrowings are carried at fair value.<br />

As at the reporting date, the Group has the following variable rate<br />

borrowings outstanding:<br />

December <strong>2010</strong> June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Weighted<br />

Weighted<br />

average<br />

average<br />

interest<br />

interest<br />

rate Balance rate Balance<br />

% $’000 % $’000<br />

Borrowings 2.47 9,177 2.54 9,282<br />

The Group’s fixed rate borrowings are carried at amortised cost.<br />

As they are fixed rate borrowings, they are not subject to interest<br />

rate risk as defined by AASB 7, Financial Instruments:<br />

Disclosures.<br />

The Group analyses its interest rate exposure on a dynamic<br />

basis. Various scenarios are simulated taking into consideration<br />

refinancing, renewal of existing positions, alternative financing<br />

and hedging. Based on these scenarios, the Group calculates<br />

the impact on profit and loss of a defined interest rate shift. No<br />

financial instruments are used to manage interest rate risk.<br />

(b) Credit Risk<br />

Credit risk is managed on a Group basis. Credit risk arises from<br />

cash and cash equivalents and deposits with banks and financial<br />

institutions, as well as credit exposures to customers, including<br />

outstanding receivables and committed transactions.<br />

The Group is exposed to a concentration of risk with sales of iron<br />

ore being made to a limited number of customers. The maximum<br />

exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is limited to the<br />

carrying value of trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents<br />

and deposits with banks and financial institutions.<br />

The Group has no receivables past due as at 31 December<br />

<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

(c) Liquidity Risk<br />

Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient<br />

cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through<br />

an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability<br />

to close out market positions. The Group manages liquidity risk<br />

by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and<br />

matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities.<br />

Financing arrangements<br />

The Group has fully drawn available borrowing facilities as at the<br />

reporting date.<br />

Maturities of financial liabilities<br />

The table below analyses the Groups financial liabilities into<br />

relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period as at<br />

the reporting date to the contractual maturity date. The amounts<br />

disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash<br />

flows.<br />

Group sensitivity<br />

The Group’s fixed rate borrowings are carried at amortised cost.<br />

As they are fixed rate borrowing, they are not subject to interest<br />

rate risk and are excluded from the interest rate sensitivity<br />

analysis.<br />

At 31 December <strong>2010</strong>, if interest rates had increased by 5 basis<br />

points (bps) or decreased by 5 basis points from the period end<br />

rates with all other variables held constant, post tax profit for the<br />

period would have been $0.4 million higher / $0.4 million lower<br />

(June <strong>2010</strong> changes of 5 bps / 5 bps: $0.3 million higher / $0.3<br />

million lower).<br />

Overview<br />

Review Of Operations<br />

Corporate Governance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!