09.01.2015 Views

Megaprojects - KPMG

Megaprojects - KPMG

Megaprojects - KPMG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UP FRONT<br />

Time changes<br />

everything<br />

<strong>Megaprojects</strong> often bring with them<br />

mega-challenges. Cost and time overruns,<br />

obsolete technology, shifting<br />

political support and turbulent economic<br />

conditions are all frequent horror<br />

stories that emerge from the annals of<br />

megaproject delivery.<br />

But, as Bent Flyvbjerg notes in his<br />

interview on page 12, almost all of these<br />

big challenges ultimately boil down to one<br />

thing: time. Given that most megaprojects<br />

require a decade – some much more – to<br />

complete, the passage of time clearly has<br />

a major impact on the eventual success<br />

of megaprojects.<br />

The more time between planning<br />

and delivery, the more likely that new<br />

challenges and complexities will arise.<br />

Technology changes every few years,<br />

political priorities evolve on an almost<br />

weekly basis, and economic cycles rise<br />

and fall with the subtlety of a bull in a<br />

china shop.<br />

Yet the human brain is not particularly<br />

equipped to prophesize future trends and<br />

disruptions. Even the most imaginative<br />

megaproject designer can’t know all of<br />

the changes that will occur in the world<br />

throughout the asset’s life-cycle. So rather<br />

than making huge and unquantifiable<br />

guesses, many infrastructure owners<br />

and planners are instead focusing on<br />

developing strategies to help ‘futureproof’<br />

their designs to flex with the<br />

changes that will almost certainly occur;<br />

undoubtedly a more achievable and<br />

sensible goal.<br />

Take technological change, for example.<br />

Rather than going to ‘bleeding edge’<br />

technology, many megaproject planners<br />

are instead demanding proven and tested<br />

technology that can inter-operate with<br />

future systems. Similarly, changes in the<br />

political arena can often be mitigated by<br />

creating robust regulatory regimes and<br />

independent infrastructure bodies that<br />

have the authority to move ahead with<br />

development through the political cycles.<br />

Within this publication, we have included<br />

a number of projects that exemplify<br />

this new, more flexible approach to<br />

megaproject development. Queensland’s<br />

Reconstruction Authority (page 30)<br />

is a great example of how an independent<br />

authority can cut through the complexity<br />

of politics and administrative red tape<br />

to achieve great things. UK’s Crossrail<br />

program (page 48) mixes tried and<br />

tested technology with a handful of<br />

new innovations to ensure the line serves<br />

Londoners well into the future. Mexico’s<br />

planned tourist city (page 56) plans to tap<br />

into a wide mix of investors to smooth<br />

out economic cycles.<br />

But megaproject participants must be<br />

warned: trying to identify and respond<br />

to all of the potential changes can often<br />

lead to project paralysis. The trick here<br />

is to do whatever possible to futureproof<br />

the project, identify the most<br />

disruptive future trends and focus on<br />

taking a holistic approach to design and<br />

delivery. What happens after that, only<br />

time will tell.<br />

<strong>Megaprojects</strong> | INSIGHT | 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!