09.01.2015 Views

PERMANENT PEOPLES' TRIBUNAL, SESSION ON COLOMBIA ...

PERMANENT PEOPLES' TRIBUNAL, SESSION ON COLOMBIA ...

PERMANENT PEOPLES' TRIBUNAL, SESSION ON COLOMBIA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

when a witness, who had been detained and convicted for rebellion, referred to<br />

the moment of her capture, she said: “as an educator, I was worried we were<br />

running out of students since the government required a minimum number of<br />

students […]. We met in spite of the plan announced by the government to close<br />

the schools.” Then, “they came into the room where I was resting and screamed:<br />

Where are the weapons”<br />

RESTRICTI<strong>ON</strong>S TO THE FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT<br />

The Tribunal was also able to verify the violation to the right to the freedom of<br />

movement, recognised in the Colombian constitution and international<br />

legislation (which is a part of the Colombian legislation). Specifically, according<br />

to a witness, so called areas of exclusion have been established in which a virtual<br />

state of war reigns under the direct control of the armed forces and private<br />

security companies at the service of the oil enterprises. The disproportionate<br />

militarization of these areas is demonstrated by the following testimony provided<br />

by a mother describing the murder of her underage child: “my son went to a lake<br />

with a friend to hunt some chigüiros for the festivities and a watchman saw<br />

them and called the army at Caño Limón.” Later, the child was found dead. It is<br />

noteworthy the witness identifies the armed forces as an army belonging to the<br />

transnational enterprise.<br />

Testimony and documents also demonstrated this situation worsened from the<br />

arbitrary nature of the military checkpoints on the roads and the restrictions on<br />

the circulation of food, medicine and other essential goods, bearing in mind the<br />

poverty of these rural communities. According to one witness, “if we were<br />

carrying foodstuff worth more than 150 thousand pesos [approximately 50<br />

euros], it was taken from us, since they said it was meant for the guerrilla […].<br />

We weren’t allowed to have cement or food or nothing of any worth.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!