10.01.2015 Views

Policy Analysis of Education in Punjab Province - UNESCO Islamabad

Policy Analysis of Education in Punjab Province - UNESCO Islamabad

Policy Analysis of Education in Punjab Province - UNESCO Islamabad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F<strong>in</strong>al: 29 November 2011<br />

<strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

Compilation and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

by<br />

Dr. Allah Bakhsh Malik<br />

For<br />

<strong>UNESCO</strong> <strong>Islamabad</strong> (Pakistan)


Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Tables,<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Figures<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Boxes<br />

Maps<br />

Abbreviations<br />

Executive Summary<br />

Chapter 1:<br />

Overall Development Context and Development Priorities<br />

1.1. Overall Development Context: Social and Economic Development Indicators<br />

1.2. Overall development context and development priorities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Role and<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> social and economic development <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

1.3. Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Development Priorities and The Vision 2030<br />

1.4. New <strong>in</strong>itiatives by Government: Impact Assessment and <strong>Policy</strong> Implications<br />

Chapter: 2<br />

2.1. <strong>Education</strong> Policies <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>: Constitution <strong>of</strong> Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Pakistan 1973,<br />

Articles 37-B & Article 25-A - New Constitutional Provisions and Impact on<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Policies.<br />

2.2. Exist<strong>in</strong>g Institutional Framework for <strong>Education</strong><br />

2.3. Responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governments as a Consequence <strong>of</strong> 18 th Amendment.<br />

2.4. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>, Curriculum and Common Standards<br />

2.5. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> & Plann<strong>in</strong>g- Institutions & Processes:<br />

2.6. Curriculum & Standards- Institutions & Processes<br />

2.7. F<strong>in</strong>ancial Implications for Implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A<br />

2.8. <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Budget<br />

Page No.<br />

i<br />

iv<br />

vi<br />

vii<br />

viii<br />

x<br />

xii<br />

1<br />

1<br />

4<br />

6<br />

9<br />

13<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

18<br />

19<br />

19<br />

20<br />

22<br />

25<br />

2.9. F<strong>in</strong>ancial Resources Estimation for Article 25-A<br />

2.10. Data Sets<br />

2.11. Methodology and Variables<br />

2.12. F<strong>in</strong>ancial Projections<br />

2.13. Budget Projections<br />

Chapter: 3<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector: <strong>Policy</strong>, Current Status, Issues, Needs and Priorities<br />

3.1. Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong> -ECE<br />

3.1.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.1.2. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.2. Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.2.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.2.2. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.2.3. Vision <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.2.4. <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.2.5. Sectoral Priority <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.2.6. Strategic Interventions <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.2.7. Current Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

3.2.8. Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities<br />

3.2.9. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

27<br />

27<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

29<br />

30<br />

32<br />

32<br />

32<br />

33<br />

35<br />

57<br />

59<br />

ii


3.3. Elementary <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.3.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.3.2. Current Status, Key Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

3.3.3. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.4. Secondary and Higher Secondary <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.4.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.4.2. Current Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

3.4.3. Vision <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.4.4. <strong>Policy</strong> Interventions <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.4.5. Objectives/Strategic Interventions <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department<br />

3.4.6. Reforms <strong>in</strong>itiated by Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.4.7. Student Teacher Ratio at Primary, Middle and High Schools<br />

3.4.8. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.5. College/Tertiary <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.5.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.5.2. Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

3.5.3. Needs, Target Groups and Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.6. Technical & Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.6.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.6.2. Current Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

3.6.3. Needs, Target Groups and Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.7. <strong>Punjab</strong> Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Council (PVTC)<br />

3.7.1. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.8. Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.8.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.8.2. Interventions to Improve Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.8.3. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.8.4. Number <strong>of</strong> Institution<br />

3.8.5. Nutrition Programme<br />

3.8.6. Vision <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.8.7. <strong>Policy</strong> Interventions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.8.8. Strategic Interventions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

3.8.9. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.9. Literacy and Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.9.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.9.2. Vision <strong>of</strong> Literacy & NFBE Department<br />

3.9.3. <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Literacy & NFBE Department<br />

3.9.4. Goal <strong>of</strong> the Literacy & NFBE Department<br />

3.9.5. Objectives <strong>of</strong> Literacy & NFBE Department<br />

3.9.6. Current Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

3.9.7. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

3.10. Deeni Madaris<br />

3.10.1. <strong>Policy</strong><br />

3.10.2. Comprehensive <strong>Policy</strong> for Deeni Madaris<br />

3.10.3. Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

Chapter: 4<br />

Pakistan and the International Commitments (EFA/MDGs): Achievements<br />

and Shortfalls<br />

4.1. MDG and EFA Goals: Degree <strong>of</strong> Progress Achieved<br />

4.2. Millennium Development Goals<br />

4.3. <strong>Education</strong> For All Goals<br />

4.4. Projections to Reach MDG/EFA Goals<br />

4.5. Net Primary Enrolment Rates<br />

4.6. Gender Parity <strong>in</strong> Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

4.7. Completion/Survival Rates<br />

4.8. Youth (15-24 years old) Literacy Gender Parity<br />

Chapter: 5<br />

5.1. Public Sector Budgetary <strong>Education</strong> Allocations/Expenditures<br />

5.2. <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Budget<br />

59<br />

59<br />

59<br />

64<br />

65<br />

65<br />

65<br />

72<br />

72<br />

72<br />

72<br />

74<br />

74<br />

75<br />

75<br />

75<br />

79<br />

79<br />

79<br />

80<br />

82<br />

85<br />

87<br />

88<br />

88<br />

89<br />

90<br />

91<br />

91<br />

92<br />

92<br />

92<br />

95<br />

96<br />

96<br />

99<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

111<br />

112<br />

112<br />

113<br />

115<br />

116<br />

116<br />

116<br />

120<br />

120<br />

121<br />

122<br />

125<br />

126<br />

128<br />

128<br />

128<br />

iii


5.3. Cost Estimations 133<br />

Chapter: 6<br />

Donor Assistance to <strong>Education</strong> Sector <strong>Punjab</strong> 134<br />

Chapter: 7<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong>’s Medium Term Development: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and<br />

Priorities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

7.1. <strong>Punjab</strong>’s <strong>Education</strong> Needs <strong>in</strong> the Next Five Years<br />

7.2. Proposed Strategies and Actions for Improv<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

7.2.1. Equity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

7.2.2. Provision <strong>of</strong> Computer/I.T. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Elementary Schools<br />

7.2.3. Up-Gradations <strong>of</strong> the Schools<br />

7.2.4. Sectoral Priority <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong><br />

7.2.5. Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development <strong>of</strong> Teachers<br />

7.2.6. Issues <strong>in</strong> Management and Governance <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

7.2.7. F<strong>in</strong>ancial Allocations, Release <strong>of</strong> Funds and Utilization<br />

7.2.8. Implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A and Jo<strong>in</strong>t Declaration for<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

7.2.9. Emphasis on Literacy and Adult <strong>Education</strong><br />

7.2.10. Special <strong>Education</strong> for Special Children<br />

7.2.11. Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

7.2.12. Needs, Target Groups and Strategies<br />

137<br />

137<br />

139<br />

139<br />

140<br />

140<br />

140<br />

141<br />

143<br />

144<br />

145<br />

147<br />

148<br />

148<br />

149<br />

References 164 -165<br />

iv


v<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Tables<br />

# Subject <strong>of</strong> Tables Page<br />

No.<br />

Table-1: <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>, Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Curriculum Pre & Post 18th Amendment 18<br />

Table-2: <strong>Education</strong> Development Programmes 2010-11 & 2011-12 19<br />

Table-3: Projected Increase <strong>in</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> Classrooms and Schools 24<br />

Table-4: Projected Increase <strong>in</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> Teachers 24<br />

Table-5: District and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Education</strong> Budget 26<br />

Table-6: Sectoral Priority <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department 32<br />

Table-7: M<strong>in</strong>imum Service Delivery Standard for School <strong>Education</strong> 33<br />

Table-8: Criteria for Up-Gradation <strong>of</strong> Schools - From Primary to Middle Level 34<br />

Table-9: From Middle to High Level 34<br />

Table-10: Trends <strong>of</strong> Allocation 34<br />

Table-11: Gross Enrollment Rate at Primary Level (Age 5 to 9) 35<br />

Table-12: Net Enrollment Rate at Primary Level (Age 5 to 9) 35<br />

Table-13: Gross Enrollment Rate at Middle Level (Age10 to12) 36<br />

Table-14: Net Enrollment Rate at Middle Level (Age 10 to 12) 36<br />

Table-15: Literacy Rate-Population 10 Years & Older 36<br />

Table-16: Adult Literacy (Population 15 Years & Older) 37<br />

Table-17: Population That Has Ever Attended School 39<br />

Table-18: Percentage Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population that has Completed Primary Level or Higher 40<br />

Table-19: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class 41<br />

Table-20: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 6-10) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class 42<br />

Table-21: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 4-9) Includ<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class 43<br />

Table-22: Gross Enrolment Rate for Government Primary Schools (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi 44<br />

Class<br />

Table-23: Net Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class 45<br />

Table-24: Net Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 6-10) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class 46<br />

Table-25: Net Enrolment Rate at Primary Level (Age 4-9) Includ<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class 47<br />

Table-26: Net Enrolment Rate <strong>in</strong> Government Primary Schools (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi 48<br />

Class<br />

Table-27: Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>al Institutions <strong>in</strong> Public and Private Sector 50<br />

Table-28: Gross Primary Level Enrolment Rate (Includ<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class) 51<br />

Table-29: Gross Primary Level Enrolment Rate (Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class) 51<br />

Table-30: Net Primary Level Enrolment Rate (Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class) 51<br />

Table-31: Enrolments <strong>in</strong> Government Schools as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> Total Enrolment at Primary 52<br />

Level<br />

Table-32 : Percentage <strong>of</strong> Population Ever Attended School by Income Class, Urban-Rural 52<br />

Residence and Gender<br />

Table-33: Primary Level Enrolments <strong>in</strong> Private Schools 53<br />

Table-34: Reasons for Never Go<strong>in</strong>g to School 53<br />

Table-35: Government Mosque and Primary Schools for Boys and Girls, Numbers, 56<br />

Enrollment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Table-36: Drop-Out Rates 57<br />

Table-37: Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities 2010-2011 57<br />

Table-38: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Middle Level (Age10-12) 61<br />

Table-39: Net Enrolment Rate at the Middle Level (Age10-12) 62<br />

Table-40: Government Middle Schools for Boys & Girls, Their Enrollment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Staff<br />

63


Table-41: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Matric Level (Age13-14) 67<br />

Table-42: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Matric Level (Age14-15) 68<br />

Table-43: Net Enrolment Rate at the Matric Level (Age13-14) 69<br />

Table-44: Net Enrolment Rate at Matric Level (Age 14- 15 ) 70<br />

Table-45: Government High Schools for Boys & Girls, Their Enrollment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff 71<br />

Table-46: Trend <strong>of</strong> Allocations 73<br />

Table-47: Student Teacher Ratio <strong>of</strong> Schools 74<br />

Table-48: Enrolment <strong>in</strong> Arts & Science Intermediate, Degree Colleges and Higher Secondary 76<br />

Schools by Study Group and Sex<br />

Table-49: Post –Graduate Enrolment <strong>in</strong> Affiliated Colleges 76<br />

Table-50: Arts and Science Colleges for Boys and Girls, Enrolment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff 77<br />

Table-51: Arts & Science Colleges for Boys &Girls, Enrolment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff 77<br />

Table-52: Number <strong>of</strong> Higher Secondary Schools for Boys &Girls, Enrolment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g 78<br />

Staff<br />

Table-53: Development & Non-Development Budget <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department 78<br />

Table-54: TEVTA Institutions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> 85<br />

Table-55: Enrolment <strong>in</strong> Technical Institutions 85<br />

Table-56: Econometrics <strong>of</strong> PVTC 86<br />

Table-57: PVTC Facilitation 86<br />

Table-58: Capitalization Value <strong>of</strong> VTIs 86<br />

Table-59: Role and Responsibilities 87<br />

Table-60: Population Time Bomb 87<br />

Table-61: Staff & Teacher Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institute 88<br />

Table-62: Disabled Population 89<br />

Table-63: Year-wise Enrollment 89<br />

Table-64: Disabilities 91<br />

Table-65: Different Disabilities 91<br />

Table-66: Budget Allocation 92<br />

Table-67: Trend <strong>of</strong> Allocations 92<br />

Table-68: Allocation and Number <strong>of</strong> Beneficiaries 93<br />

Table-69: Construction <strong>of</strong> Build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Centers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> 94<br />

Table-70: Literacy-Population 10 Years and Older 102<br />

Table-71: Adult Literacy-Population 15 Years and Older 103<br />

Table-72: Literacy - Population 10 Years and Older - By Qu<strong>in</strong>tile Group 104<br />

Table-73: Literacy Ratios by Sex and Area 104<br />

Table-74: Trends <strong>of</strong> Allocation <strong>of</strong> Development Budget 104<br />

Table-75: Population that has ever Attended School 106<br />

Table-76: Estimated Population Male/ Female age-group wise as <strong>in</strong> 2009 108<br />

Table-77: Country-Wide Madrassas Enrollment –Different Sources 113<br />

Table-78: Enrolled Children <strong>in</strong> Three Districts 114<br />

Table-79: Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Madrassa and Non-Madrassa Households 114<br />

Table-80: Rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Selected Countries on the EFA Development Index 116<br />

Table-81: Net Primary Enrolment Rate 2001/02-2010/11 121<br />

Table-82: Gender Parity Index (GPI) Primary <strong>Education</strong> : 2001/02-2010-11 123<br />

Table-83: Gender Parity Index (GPI) <strong>in</strong> Youth Literacy: 2001/02-2010/11 124<br />

Table-84: Gender Parity Index (GPI) Secondary <strong>Education</strong>: 2010/11 124<br />

Table-85: Completion/Survival Rates till Grade V: 2001/02-2010/11 125<br />

Table-86: Adult Literacy Rate 2001/02-2010/11 126<br />

Table-87: Out <strong>of</strong> School Children <strong>in</strong> 2010-11 belong<strong>in</strong>g to 5-9 Year Age Group 127<br />

Table-88: Achievements <strong>of</strong> Targets and Supportive Environment 127<br />

Table-89: Outcome Based Targets for <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> 128<br />

Table-90: Allocation Trend (Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Budget) Current and Development Budgets 129<br />

Table-91: Allocation Trend (District <strong>Education</strong>) Current and Development Budgets 129<br />

vi


Table-92: Sector Wise Comparison <strong>of</strong> Development Programme 2010-11 and 2011-12 132<br />

Table-93: <strong>Punjab</strong> Actual <strong>Education</strong> Expenditures & Share <strong>in</strong> Total Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Expenditures 132<br />

(2009/10)<br />

Table-94: DFID 134<br />

Table-95: GIZ Germany 134<br />

Table-96: Japan 134<br />

Table-97: <strong>UNESCO</strong> 135<br />

Table-98: The World Bank 135<br />

Table-99: Canadian International Development Agency 136<br />

Table-100: Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong> 150<br />

Table-101: Primary <strong>Education</strong> 151<br />

Table-102: Elementary <strong>Education</strong> 152<br />

Table-103: Secondary <strong>Education</strong> 153<br />

Table-104: Higher Secondary <strong>Education</strong> and Intermediate Colleges 155<br />

Table-105: Higher <strong>Education</strong> 156<br />

Table-106: Literacy and Non-Formal <strong>Education</strong> 158<br />

Table-107: Special <strong>Education</strong> 159<br />

Table-108: Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong> 160<br />

Table-109: Deeni Madaris 162<br />

Table-110: <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Emergencies 163<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Figures<br />

# Subject <strong>of</strong> Figures Page<br />

No.<br />

Figure-1: Population Projection: Children <strong>of</strong> 5-16 years Age Group 22<br />

Figure-2: Projected Increase <strong>in</strong> Enrollment based on GER 23<br />

Figure-3: Projected Unit Cost Per Student per Year 23<br />

Figure-4: Annual Teacher Requirement at School Level 25<br />

Figure-5: Increase <strong>in</strong> District and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Education</strong> Budget over the Last Year Budget 26<br />

(2009-24)<br />

Figure-6: Development & Non-Development Budget <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department 78<br />

Figure-7: Expenditure by Level <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Challenge 83<br />

Figure-8: Number Game and Drop-Out Challenge 84<br />

Figure-9: Position <strong>of</strong> Pakistan <strong>in</strong> the Comity <strong>of</strong> Nations 84<br />

Figure-10: Net Primary Attendance Rate MICS 2007-08 105<br />

Figure-11: Literacy Ratios <strong>of</strong> Population Aged 10 Years & Above, By Sex and Area 1998 and 106<br />

2008-09<br />

Figure-12: Net Primary Enrolment Rate 2001/02-2010/11 122<br />

Figure-13: Gender Parity Index (GPI) Primary <strong>Education</strong> : 2001/02-2010-11 123<br />

Figure-14: Gender Parity Index (GPI) <strong>in</strong> Youth Literacy: 2001/02-2010/11 124<br />

Figure-15: Gender Parity Index (GPI) Secondary <strong>Education</strong>: 2010/11 124<br />

Figure-16: Completion/Survival Rates till Grade V: 2001/02-2010/11 125<br />

Figure-17: Adult Literacy Rate:2001/02-2010/11 126<br />

Figure-18: <strong>Punjab</strong>: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Actual <strong>Education</strong> Expenditures by Sub-Sectors (2009/10) 133<br />

vii<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Boxes<br />

# Subject <strong>of</strong> Boxes Page No.


Box-1: <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap<br />

Box-2: Public Private Partnership <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

Box-3: <strong>Education</strong> as Development Priority: The Vision 2030<br />

Box-4: Jo<strong>in</strong>t Declaration on <strong>Education</strong><br />

Box-5: <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector Reform Programme<br />

Box-6: Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities and Rationalization Process<br />

Box-7: Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development <strong>of</strong> Teachers<br />

Box-8: Role <strong>of</strong> PEF <strong>in</strong> Facilitation <strong>of</strong> Low Cost Private Schools<br />

Box-9: Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

Box-10: Achievements <strong>in</strong> Technical <strong>Education</strong><br />

Box-11: New Development Projects<br />

Box-12: Annual Development Programme 2011-12<br />

5<br />

6<br />

8<br />

12<br />

31<br />

58<br />

58<br />

63<br />

82<br />

88<br />

131<br />

131<br />

viii


MAP-1: Geographic Map <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> show<strong>in</strong>g Districts<br />

ix


x<br />

MAP-2: Academic Map show<strong>in</strong>g Literacy NFE and ALC with Public Schools <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g Gender<br />

and Level


Abbreviations<br />

ADB<br />

ADP<br />

AEPAM<br />

AJK<br />

BA<br />

BE<br />

BEd<br />

BSc<br />

BISE<br />

CIDA<br />

CPDP<br />

CM<br />

CMIS<br />

CT<br />

CSO<br />

DCO<br />

DFID<br />

DMO<br />

DSD<br />

ECE<br />

ECED<br />

EDO<br />

EEA<br />

EFA<br />

ESR<br />

GAR<br />

GAT<br />

GCU<br />

GDP<br />

GER<br />

GNI<br />

GNP<br />

GPI<br />

GRE<br />

HDI<br />

HEC<br />

HED<br />

IDSP<br />

IYF<br />

JBIC<br />

JICA<br />

KM<br />

LHV<br />

L&NFBED<br />

M&E<br />

MBA<br />

MBBS<br />

MDGs<br />

Asian Development Bank<br />

Annual Development Programme<br />

Academy for <strong>Education</strong>al Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Management<br />

Azad Jammu Kashmir<br />

Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Arts<br />

Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Bachelor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Science<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Intermediate and Secondary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Canadian International Development Agency<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Programme<br />

Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

College Management Information System<br />

Certificate <strong>of</strong> Teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Civil Society Organization<br />

District Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Officer<br />

Department for International Development<br />

District Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Officer<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Staff Development<br />

Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong><br />

Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong> and Development<br />

Executive District Officer<br />

<strong>Education</strong> & Employment Alliance<br />

<strong>Education</strong> For All<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Sector Reform<br />

Gross Attendance Rate<br />

Graduate Aptitude Test<br />

Government College University<br />

Gross Domestic Product<br />

Gross Enrollment Ration<br />

Gross National Income<br />

Gross National Product<br />

Gender Parity Index<br />

Graduate Record Exam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Human Development Index<br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong> Commission<br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

Institute for Develop<strong>in</strong>g Studies and Practices<br />

International Youth Foundation<br />

Japan Bank for International Cooperation<br />

Japan International Cooperation Agency<br />

Kilo Meters<br />

Lady Health Visitor<br />

Literacy and Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Evaluation<br />

Master <strong>of</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>e and Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Surgery<br />

Millennium Development Goals<br />

xi


MEd<br />

MICS<br />

MIS<br />

MPhil<br />

NAR<br />

NCHD<br />

NEAS<br />

NEC<br />

NEMIS<br />

NEP<br />

NER<br />

NFBE<br />

NGO<br />

NIPS<br />

NLC<br />

NOC<br />

NTBP<br />

NTS<br />

NUML<br />

PEC<br />

PEF<br />

PEEF<br />

PESRP<br />

PhD<br />

PITE<br />

PMIU<br />

PPIU<br />

PPP<br />

PSDP<br />

PSLM<br />

PTB<br />

PTC<br />

QAT<br />

SED<br />

STR<br />

TPE<br />

TVE<br />

<strong>UNESCO</strong><br />

UNICEF<br />

UOE<br />

USAID<br />

WB<br />

Master <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey<br />

Management Information System<br />

Master <strong>of</strong> Philosophy<br />

Net Attendance Rate<br />

National Commission for Human Development<br />

National <strong>Education</strong> Assessment System<br />

National <strong>Education</strong> Census<br />

National <strong>Education</strong> Management Information System<br />

National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Net Enrolment Rate<br />

Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong><br />

Non-Governmental Organization<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Population Studies<br />

National Logistic Cell<br />

No Objection Certificate<br />

National Textbook <strong>Policy</strong><br />

National Test<strong>in</strong>g Service<br />

National University <strong>of</strong> Modern Languages<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Commission<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Endowment Fund<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector Reform Programme<br />

Doctor <strong>of</strong> Philosophy<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Institute for Teacher <strong>Education</strong><br />

Project Management and Implementation Unit<br />

<strong>Policy</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g Implementation Unit<br />

Public Private Partnership<br />

Public Sector Development Programme<br />

Pakistan Social and Liv<strong>in</strong>g Standards Measurement Survey<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Textbook Board<br />

Primary Teachers’ Certificate<br />

Quality Assurance Test<br />

School <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

Student Teacher Ratio<br />

Third Party Evaluation<br />

Technical & Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

United Nations <strong>Education</strong>al Scientific and Cultural Organization<br />

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

United States Agency for International Development<br />

World Bank<br />

xii


xiii<br />

Executive Summary<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has carried out an <strong>in</strong>tensive and exhaustive review <strong>of</strong><br />

education sector <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. <strong>Education</strong> is <strong>of</strong> immense importance as a driver for empowerment and<br />

progress for the people. <strong>Education</strong> is itself important but when seen <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> the roles it plays to<br />

enable people to advance further <strong>in</strong> life and escape from clutches <strong>of</strong> poverty and destitution, it becomes a<br />

qu<strong>in</strong>tessential public policy requisite <strong>in</strong> all <strong>in</strong>itiatives, required to be undertaken to take the country forward<br />

for socio-economic development, economic growth and holistic development. The whole paradigm <strong>of</strong><br />

development squarely h<strong>in</strong>ges upon education lead<strong>in</strong>g to social capital formation. <strong>Education</strong> plays a decisive<br />

role <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g human capabilities to accelerate economic growth through knowledge, creativity, <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

and skills. <strong>Education</strong> helps <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g knowledge based societies and knowledge based learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

organizations. <strong>Education</strong> is not just preparation for life but a life <strong>in</strong> itself. The <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has focused on the current <strong>in</strong>itiatives, needs and targets to be achieved after the 18 th<br />

Amendment <strong>in</strong> the Constitution and the way forward to achieve MDG/EFA Goals and meet <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

commitments.<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has exam<strong>in</strong>ed the post scenario after the <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>of</strong> Article<br />

25-A <strong>in</strong> the 18 th Amendment right to education. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Amendment, education has been conferred<br />

as a right and the state is responsible for provid<strong>in</strong>g free and compulsory education to all children <strong>of</strong> the age<br />

<strong>of</strong> five to sixteen years <strong>in</strong> such manner as may be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by law. Earlier Article 37 (b) exclusively dealt<br />

with removal <strong>of</strong> illiteracy and provision <strong>of</strong> free and compulsory secondary education but did not prescribe a<br />

time period rather the provision mentioned, with<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum possible time. With Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Constitution, education has become an enforceable right. The implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A requires free<br />

and compulsory education up to secondary level. This requires more <strong>in</strong>frastructure, teachers, educational<br />

managers and secretariat staff. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has taken <strong>in</strong>to account all the<br />

essential requirements for implementation <strong>of</strong> the Amendment <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. The 18 th<br />

Constitutional Amendment has essentially brought forth a legal challenge with multiple jurisdictional and<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative implications at federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial levels. Apart from other reconfigurations, with deletion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Concurrent Legislative List, the Amendment has transferred forty seven subjects, to the legislative and<br />

executive doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces. The major areas to have direct effect <strong>of</strong> 18 th Constitutional Amendment<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude: laws, rules, regulations, policies as well as the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative structures. In order to be compliant<br />

with the requirement <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A, the required f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources are estimated <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

<strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce amount to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs.3387 billion for achiev<strong>in</strong>g 98% enrolment rate <strong>of</strong> 5-16<br />

years <strong>of</strong> population by 2024-25. It <strong>in</strong>cludes Rs.3023.78 billion current and Rs.363.26 billion development<br />

budgets. On average, a 15% annual <strong>in</strong>crease over the previous years <strong>in</strong> education budget is required for<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g the targets under 25-A.The achievement <strong>of</strong> targets is closely l<strong>in</strong>ked with the resource absorptive<br />

capacity. The system lacks capacity to efficiently absorb even the available f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources. This capacity<br />

deficit needs to be bridged to effectively manage the additional resources and to seize the opportunities<br />

available after the 18 th Amendment.<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce envisages that <strong>Punjab</strong> is also major manpower contributor<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g the largest pool <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and highly skilled manpower. <strong>Education</strong> is a vital prerequisite for all<br />

development <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g combat<strong>in</strong>g poverty, empower<strong>in</strong>g women, protect<strong>in</strong>g children from<br />

hazardous and exploitative labor and sexual exploitation, promot<strong>in</strong>g human rights and democracy, protect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environment and <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g population growth. Invest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> literacy programs is a sensible and essential<br />

development choice. <strong>Education</strong> is a key component <strong>of</strong> strategies to promote susta<strong>in</strong>able development and<br />

peace. It is central to achiev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> for All and the Millennium Development Goals. <strong>Education</strong> is a<br />

development accelerator and a force for peace. <strong>Education</strong> empowers <strong>in</strong>dividuals, equipp<strong>in</strong>g them with the<br />

skills and confidence to seek vital <strong>in</strong>formation and to make <strong>in</strong>formed choices that have a direct impact on<br />

their families and communities. Illiteracy is an unacceptable situation which is hold<strong>in</strong>g back all efforts to<br />

reduce poverty and advance human development. It is <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement <strong>of</strong> human rights and fundamental<br />

freedoms and a threat to peace and security. In order to implement Article 25-A, many <strong>in</strong>itiatives need to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> education sector. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has focused on the sub sectors <strong>of</strong><br />

education i.e. Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong>, Primary <strong>Education</strong>, Elementary <strong>Education</strong>, Secondary and Higher<br />

Secondary <strong>Education</strong>, College/Tertiary <strong>Education</strong>, Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong>, Special <strong>Education</strong>,


Literacy and Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> and Deeni Madaris have been put under anvil and policy, current<br />

issues, needs targets groups, strategies and way forward have been discussed. Millennium Development<br />

Goals and EFA Goals have been discussed <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> pace <strong>of</strong> progress achieved <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

Projections to reach MDG/EFA Goals have been analyzed <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> net primary enrollment rates, gender<br />

parity <strong>in</strong> primary education, completion and survival rates and youth literacy gender parity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

<strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The donor assistance to education sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has also been<br />

discussed with particular focus on the objectives <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itiatives. <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> System needed a Five<br />

Years Strategic Plan to ensure achievement <strong>of</strong> MDGs by 2015 and EFA Targets. While formulat<strong>in</strong>g Vision<br />

2030, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, rightly emphasized on Medium Term Development Plan, Five Years<br />

Strategic Plan and Ten Years Strategic Plan. The strategic plans are focus<strong>in</strong>g on Universal Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

(UPE), completion <strong>of</strong> full primary school<strong>in</strong>g by all children, promote gender equality, ensure 100%<br />

participation rate at primary level by 2011 and participation through enhancement at the elementary and<br />

secondary levels, improv<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>of</strong> education, promotion <strong>of</strong> science and computer education up to<br />

secondary level, reduction <strong>in</strong> gender and regional disparities <strong>in</strong> access to education and provision <strong>of</strong> quality<br />

education for deprived and marg<strong>in</strong>alized segments <strong>of</strong> society. Medium Term Development Framework<br />

(2010-13) and Annual Development Programme (2010-11) clearly del<strong>in</strong>eate the strategy to cater for the<br />

needs and priorities <strong>of</strong> education sector and are <strong>in</strong> unison with Vision 2030, Medium Term Development Plan<br />

(2010-13), Five Years Strategic Plan (2010-15) and Ten Years Strategic Plan (2010-20). For provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

quality education, different <strong>in</strong>terventions like capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> teachers and managers; cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g achievements through exam<strong>in</strong>ations; provision <strong>of</strong> quality text books, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

technology labs, science labs and libraries have already been <strong>in</strong>troduced. Moreover, up-gradation <strong>of</strong> schools<br />

from Primary to Elementary level and from Elementary to High level and provision <strong>of</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities<br />

(Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water, Sanitation, Boundary Walls, Electricity, Furniture & Toilet blocks). The <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

<strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has also addressed the needs, target groups and strategies for each sub sector <strong>of</strong><br />

education.<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has taken <strong>in</strong>to account the resolve by the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong><br />

Pakistan along with the top political leadership from four prov<strong>in</strong>ces, Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir<br />

resolved on September 16, 2011. Federal and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governments reaffirmed their commitment to<br />

education as a priority. National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2009, subject to such adaptations as are necessitated <strong>in</strong><br />

view <strong>of</strong> the 18 th Constitutional Amendment shall cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be jo<strong>in</strong>tly owned national document. Each<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce shall develop an Action Plan which shall commit to appropriately raise allocations for education.<br />

Set priorities accord<strong>in</strong>g to prov<strong>in</strong>cial needs <strong>of</strong> access and quality <strong>of</strong> education and provide implementation<br />

strategies with timeframe and key <strong>in</strong>dicators and ensure fulfillment <strong>of</strong> constitutional needs with respect to<br />

education and meet the <strong>in</strong>ternational commitments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g targets <strong>of</strong> Millennium Development Goals and<br />

<strong>Education</strong> for all goals. After 18 th Amendment <strong>in</strong> the Constitution, the Jo<strong>in</strong>t Declaration at the highest level is<br />

a very good omen for a political resolve for the implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A.<br />

The <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>dicates that the discourse and policy debate on the 18 th<br />

Constitutional Amendment needs to be <strong>in</strong>formed with evidence-based solutions and proposals for respond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the educational challenges. The 18 th Constitutional Amendment has sufficiently empowered the prov<strong>in</strong>ces<br />

and ensured free education for the children <strong>of</strong> five to sixteen years <strong>of</strong> age as an enforceable right. There is a<br />

need to broaden the debate so that it encompasses technical, political, and policy aspects <strong>of</strong> the new education<br />

governance framework given by the 18 th Constitutional Amendment. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has highlighted that after the dissolution <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, the federal government needs to<br />

create a coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g vector for perform<strong>in</strong>g its role.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has chalked out a roadmap and adopted a strategy for 100% enrollment <strong>of</strong> schoolgo<strong>in</strong>g-age<br />

children and their retention. The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has declared, ‘<strong>Education</strong> Emergency’ and<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> School Reform Roadmap by the Chief M<strong>in</strong>ster has aimed to ensure good governance, equity, access<br />

and quality <strong>of</strong> education. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the roadmap are that every child enrolls <strong>in</strong> school, every child is<br />

reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> school and every child learns and makes progress. The roadmap document focuses on improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Government schools by reach<strong>in</strong>g the prov<strong>in</strong>ce’s education goals and expands <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation<br />

as well as strengthen<strong>in</strong>g Government schools. The Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> and the present political<br />

leadership is <strong>of</strong> the considered view that <strong>in</strong> two years, <strong>Punjab</strong> can make a ‘quantum leap’ <strong>in</strong> educational<br />

xiv


outcomes. The roadmap <strong>in</strong>tends to dispel some myths that children do not attend school because their<br />

families are too poor and with more money the system would improve. The roadmap has <strong>in</strong>dentified a set <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>novative <strong>in</strong>itiatives that will get children <strong>in</strong>to school. The roadmap essentially concentrates on an effective<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>e for school reforms, strong central coord<strong>in</strong>ation, teacher and school leader support, scripted lessons<br />

and engag<strong>in</strong>g material, <strong>in</strong>centives for high performance, students basic needs fulfillment, high caliber<br />

management staff, universal standards and curriculum, student assessment, regular and reliable data<br />

collection and competitive compensation for teachers. The roadmap has an implementation strategy and<br />

Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister Secretariat will ensure that education reform is top priority Secretary Schools has taken<br />

overall responsibility for school reform, design programs and support districts <strong>in</strong> implementation. District<br />

Managers have taken responsibility for achievement <strong>of</strong> district targets to implement centrally designed<br />

programs and <strong>Punjab</strong> Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Commission is monitor<strong>in</strong>g progress <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g the roadmap,<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g schools for quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>puts and outcomes and provid<strong>in</strong>g data for student achievement and<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g reports with the system. External partners are provid<strong>in</strong>g technical support and <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

knowledge to the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and districts <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> advice, coach<strong>in</strong>g and formal tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Education</strong><br />

<strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce has identified that the leadership is the most important ‘secret <strong>in</strong>gredient’<br />

for translat<strong>in</strong>g good education policies <strong>in</strong>to results. In the face <strong>of</strong> a dire educational emergency, leaders at<br />

every level from Secretaries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Education</strong> Departments to the head teachers <strong>in</strong> each school, will need to<br />

work together to create an education system that delivers. In the medium term, <strong>Punjab</strong> will need to spend<br />

more money on education if it has to meet its education goals and <strong>in</strong> the long term, there has to be<br />

consistency <strong>in</strong> policies. The critics have however, serious reservations about the achievement <strong>of</strong> goals <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap with<strong>in</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> two years. They are <strong>of</strong> the view that <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements do<br />

not exist to accommodate all the out-<strong>of</strong>-school children <strong>in</strong> public, private and non-formal schools. Without<br />

enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the capacity and <strong>in</strong>frastructure along with human resource, the <strong>Punjab</strong> School Reform Roadmap<br />

will be noth<strong>in</strong>g but another political slogan. It is too early to pass a valued judgment on the success <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention s<strong>in</strong>ce the results <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itiatives have yet to be verified by a Third Party Evaluation. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>terim reports submitted by Executive District Officers <strong>Education</strong>, verified by District Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Officers<br />

are however, very encourag<strong>in</strong>g. The reports <strong>in</strong>dicated that 60% <strong>of</strong> the districts <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> have achieved the<br />

100% enrollment <strong>of</strong> school go<strong>in</strong>g-age-children.<br />

xv


Chapter-1: Overall Development Context and Development Priorities<br />

1.1: Overall Development Context: Social and Economic Development Indicators<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> is the most populous prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> Pakistan and the estimated population <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce is<br />

90.51 million. The prov<strong>in</strong>ce has an area <strong>of</strong> 2, 05,344 per square kilometer; with the average<br />

population density <strong>of</strong> 441 persons per square kilometer. Around 48.4% (i.e. 43.77 million)<br />

population <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce comprises females. Literacy rate <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce (10 years and<br />

above) is 60% (male 70% and female 51%). However, there are wide variations among the districts<br />

across the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di has the highest literacy rate at 79% but 87% for male and 71% for<br />

female. Hafizabad has literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 58% whereas it is 68% for male and 48% for female. In<br />

Southern <strong>Punjab</strong>, the situation further deteriorates s<strong>in</strong>ce the literacy rate <strong>in</strong> D.G.Khan is 43%<br />

whereas it is 57% for male and 29% for female. Rajanpur has the lowest literacy rate <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> with literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 34% whereas it is 45% for male and 22% for female (NIPS, 2009 1 ,<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011 2 , PSLM 2010-11 3 ).<br />

With approximately 56% <strong>of</strong> the country's total population, <strong>Punjab</strong>’s share <strong>of</strong> Pakistan's Gross<br />

Domestic Product (GDP) was 54.7% <strong>in</strong> 2000 and soared to 59% <strong>in</strong> 2010, especially dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> the<br />

services and agriculture sectors, with its contribution; rang<strong>in</strong>g from 52.1% to 64.5% <strong>in</strong> the services<br />

sector and 56.1% to 61.5% <strong>in</strong> the agriculture sector. In terms <strong>of</strong> social and economic development<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators; the overall situation is not enviable. 92% <strong>of</strong> the population has access to improved<br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water sources with<strong>in</strong> dwell<strong>in</strong>g and 5% with<strong>in</strong> the distance <strong>of</strong> half an hour but water test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water revealed that the water <strong>in</strong> about half <strong>of</strong> the households <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

bacteria and was thus unsafe for dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, with significant variations across districts. Overall, 70%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the population (urban 96 %; rural 58 %) uses improved sanitation facilities with 67 % us<strong>in</strong>g flush<br />

toilets connected to sewerage systems, septic tanks or pit latr<strong>in</strong>es. Half <strong>of</strong> the population is covered<br />

by lady health workers (NIPS, 2009, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-08 and<br />

2010-11).<br />

The under-five mortality rate <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is estimated at 111 deaths per 1000 live births while the<br />

<strong>in</strong>fant mortality rate (for children under 1 year <strong>of</strong> age) is 77 deaths per 1,000 births. 34% <strong>of</strong> children<br />

under the age <strong>of</strong> 5 are moderately or severely underweight. About 2 <strong>in</strong> 5 children (42%) are<br />

severely or moderately stunted and 13% <strong>of</strong> children are severely or moderately wasted. Only 6 % <strong>of</strong><br />

households are us<strong>in</strong>g adequately iodized salt. The births <strong>of</strong> 77% <strong>of</strong> children less than 5 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

are registered (<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-08 and 2010-11).<br />

About 1 <strong>in</strong> 20 children aged 5–14 years are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> child labor (5%), with significant variations<br />

across gender, areas <strong>of</strong> residence, districts and wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tiles. About 5% <strong>of</strong> children <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> aged 2–9 years have at least one reported type <strong>of</strong> disability, with the most commonly cited<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>ability to speak or be understood <strong>in</strong> words. 53% women receive antenatal care from a<br />

medical doctor, nurse, midwife or Lady Health Visitor (LHV) at least once dur<strong>in</strong>g the pregnancy.<br />

About 7% <strong>of</strong> people over 15 years <strong>of</strong> age are unemployed, with 6 % unemployed <strong>in</strong> rural areas and<br />

8% <strong>in</strong> urban areas. Most unemployed adults are <strong>in</strong> the 15–24 age-group (<strong>Punjab</strong> Development<br />

Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-08 and 2010-11).<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Pakistan: National Institute <strong>of</strong> Population Studies (NIPS 2010)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Lahore<br />

http://www.pndpunjab.gov.pk/page.aspid=65<br />

Pakistan Social and Liv<strong>in</strong>g Standards Measurements Surveys (PSLM, 2007-08 and 2010-11)<br />

1


84% <strong>of</strong> the population own a house, 34% own agricultural land and 51% own livestock. As<br />

expected, ownership <strong>of</strong> agricultural land and livestock is the greatest amongst the rural population.<br />

As expected, ownership <strong>of</strong> agricultural land and livestock is greatest amongst the rural population.<br />

12% <strong>of</strong> households have at least one family member work<strong>in</strong>g outside their village or town and 39%<br />

are work<strong>in</strong>g overseas. About 6% <strong>of</strong> households receive remittances from with<strong>in</strong> Pakistan and 4%t from<br />

Abroad (MICS 2007-08 4 , <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-08 and 2010-11).<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> is also major manpower contributor hav<strong>in</strong>g the largest pool <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and highly<br />

skilled manpower. <strong>Education</strong> is a vital prerequisite for all development <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

combat<strong>in</strong>g poverty, empower<strong>in</strong>g women, protect<strong>in</strong>g children from hazardous and exploitative labor<br />

and sexual exploitation, promot<strong>in</strong>g human rights and democracy, protect<strong>in</strong>g environment and<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g population growth. Invest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> literacy programs is a sensible and essential<br />

development choice. <strong>Education</strong> is a key component <strong>of</strong> strategies to promote susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

development and peace. It is central to achiev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> for All and the Millennium<br />

Development Goals. <strong>Education</strong> is a development accelerator and a force for peace. <strong>Education</strong><br />

empowers <strong>in</strong>dividuals, equipp<strong>in</strong>g them with the skills and confidence to seek vital <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

to make <strong>in</strong>formed choices that have a direct impact on their families and communities. Illiteracy is<br />

an unacceptable situation which is hold<strong>in</strong>g back all efforts to reduce poverty and advance human<br />

development. It is <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement <strong>of</strong> human rights and fundamental freedoms and a threat to peace<br />

and security (<strong>UNESCO</strong> 5 , Malik 6 , 2006).<br />

In <strong>Punjab</strong>, more than 90 % <strong>of</strong> households have public schools with<strong>in</strong> a radius <strong>of</strong> 2 KM, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 91<br />

% <strong>in</strong> rural areas and 96 % <strong>in</strong> urban areas. Households <strong>in</strong> the lowest qu<strong>in</strong>tile are less likely to have<br />

government schools nearby (boys 83%, girls 78%) and pr<strong>of</strong>oundly less for private schools (boys<br />

37%, girls 36%). The Gender Parity Index (GPI) show<strong>in</strong>g rates obta<strong>in</strong>ed from net enrolment for<br />

primary school is 0.98, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that more boys attend primary school than girls. The <strong>in</strong>dicator<br />

drops slightly to 0.94 for middle/secondary education <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that there are 94 girls for every 100<br />

boys attend<strong>in</strong>g secondary school. The disadvantage <strong>of</strong> girls is slightly less pronounced <strong>in</strong> major<br />

cities and more pronounced <strong>in</strong> rural areas where GPI for primary school is 0.92 and 0.81 for<br />

middle/secondary school. GPI sharply improves with mother’s education and wealth <strong>in</strong>dex. GPI for<br />

primary school is more than one <strong>in</strong> Narowal, Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di, Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong>, Faisalabad,<br />

Gujranwala, Sheikhupura, Sialkot, Lahore and Gujarat, with Narowal hav<strong>in</strong>g a strik<strong>in</strong>g GPI <strong>of</strong> 1.12.<br />

For secondary school, GPI is more than one for Gujranwala, Lahore, Gujarat, Sialkot, TT S<strong>in</strong>gh,<br />

Narowal and Sheikhupura Districts, with Gujranwala (1.16), Lahore (1.12) and Gujarat (1.11)<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g particularly high <strong>in</strong>dices. This suggests that more girls than boys attend school <strong>in</strong> these<br />

districts. Only 29 % <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> appropriate age (10-14 years) attend middle or secondary school.<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 71% are either out <strong>of</strong> school or <strong>in</strong> primary school (MICS 2007-08, <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Development Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-08 and 2010-11).<br />

4 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) <strong>Punjab</strong> 2007-08, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g & Development<br />

Department, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Lahore http://www.pndpunjab.gov.pk/user_files/File/MICS%202007-08-<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial%20Report.pdf<br />

5<br />

Message by Ms. Ir<strong>in</strong>a Bokova, Director General <strong>of</strong> <strong>UNESCO</strong> on the occasion <strong>of</strong> International Literacy Day 8 Sep<br />

2011, Section for Literacy and Non Formal <strong>Education</strong> Division for Basic to Higher <strong>Education</strong> and Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>UNESCO</strong> Bangkok www.unesco.org/education/literacy<br />

6 Malik, A. B (2006a). Econometric <strong>Analysis</strong> and Evaluative Scrut<strong>in</strong>y <strong>of</strong> the Quality Assurance Tests <strong>in</strong> Foundation<br />

Assisted Schools <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. The Hope, Quarterly Journal (Volume-I) <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Foundation, Lahore, Pakistan<br />

Malik, A. B (2006b). <strong>Education</strong> Voucher Scheme - The Hope, Quarterly Journal (Volume-II) <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Foundation, Lahore, Pakistan<br />

Malik, A. B (2006c) - The Human Development Nexus-Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development and Capacity Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Public<br />

Private Partnership, Maqbool Academy, Lahore. Pakistan<br />

2


The secondary school Net Attendance Rate (NAR) is similar for girls (28%) and for boys (30%).<br />

NARs are especially low <strong>in</strong> rural areas (23%), for children aged 10 years (5%), for children <strong>of</strong><br />

mothers with no education (21%) and children <strong>in</strong> the lowest wealth qu<strong>in</strong>tile (8%). Almost two <strong>in</strong><br />

five (43%) <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> secondary school age are <strong>in</strong> primary school and 29 % are out <strong>of</strong> school.<br />

The middle/secondary NAR is greater for boys than girls. More secondary school-aged rural<br />

children (33%) are out <strong>of</strong> school compared to urban children (17%) and more are attend<strong>in</strong>g primary<br />

school. 57% attend government schools and 43% attend private schools. In rural areas, more<br />

children attend government school (69%) than private (30%). Mothers with middle or higher<br />

education are more likely to send their children to private schools than those with primary or no<br />

education. As expected, the type <strong>of</strong> school strongly correlates with the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex. The type <strong>of</strong><br />

school also varies markedly by district: more children attend private schools than government<br />

schools <strong>in</strong> Lahore, Gujranwala, Sialkot, Faisalabad, Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di, Sheikhupura and Gujrat Districts.<br />

The gross primary attendance rate, which considers the number <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> all ages attend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

primary school as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> primary school age (5-9 years)<br />

(<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-08 and 2010-11).<br />

Gross Attendance Rate (GAR) at the primary level <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> is 97 %. The rates vary by sex,<br />

area <strong>of</strong> residence, mother's education, wealth <strong>in</strong>dex, division and district. Boys have a higher rate<br />

(102%) than girls (93%) and urban areas have higher rates (109%) than rural areas (93%). Thus<br />

more boys than girls and more urban children than rural-dwellers (<strong>of</strong> all ages) attend primary<br />

school. Gross primary attendance rates <strong>in</strong>crease sharply with the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex, from 62% <strong>in</strong> the<br />

lowest qu<strong>in</strong>tile to 113% <strong>in</strong> the highest. Overall, about half <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> primary school age <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> attend primary or secondary school (53 %). Boys have a slightly higher NAR (54%)<br />

compared to girls (52%). In urban areas, 64 % <strong>of</strong> primary school-aged children attend school<br />

compared to only 49% <strong>in</strong> rural areas. This disparity is more pronounced for girls (urban 65%; rural<br />

47%) than for boys (urban 62%; rural 51%). Attendance rates are lowest for children 5 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

at only 19%. This may be due to the fact that many children enter school at age 6 rather than age 5.<br />

School attendance <strong>in</strong>creases with mothers' education: (higher education 73 %; secondary 72%;<br />

middle 67%; primary 65%; no education 46%. (<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-<br />

08 and 2010-11)<br />

Children <strong>in</strong> the highest wealth qu<strong>in</strong>tile are more than twice as likely to attend primary school<br />

(highest 71%; lowest 31%). Large differences exist between districts, rang<strong>in</strong>g from over 65% <strong>in</strong><br />

Attock, Narowal, Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di, Jhelum, Gujrat and Chakwal to below 40% <strong>in</strong> Rajanpur, DG Khan<br />

and RY Khan. Under the <strong>Punjab</strong> education system, the age <strong>of</strong> entry to primary school is 5 years. Of<br />

5-year-olds, 19% are <strong>in</strong> Grade 1, and <strong>of</strong> 6-year-olds 38%, with only a narrow gender gap. These<br />

rates vary by area <strong>of</strong> residence and more urban children aged 5 and 6 years enter Grade 1 than rural<br />

children. There is a positive correlation with the mother's education for children aged 5 and 6 years.<br />

The highest rates are for children whose mothers have higher education; 30% for entry at age 5 and<br />

64% for entry at age 6. 14% <strong>of</strong> children aged 3-4 years are currently attend<strong>in</strong>g preschool, with<br />

comparable attendance for boys and girls. In urban areas preschool attendance is almost double that<br />

<strong>in</strong> rural areas. A much higher percentage <strong>of</strong> children aged 4 years attend preschool (22%) compared<br />

to those aged 3 years (5%). Preschool attendance <strong>in</strong>creases markedly with the mother's education<br />

and the household's wealth <strong>in</strong>dex. Large variations exist between districts, with under 5% <strong>of</strong><br />

children aged 3-4 years <strong>in</strong> Rajanpur and DG Khan Districts attend<strong>in</strong>g preschool compared to more<br />

than a quarter <strong>in</strong> Lahore and Gujranwala Districts. Universal access to basic education and the<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> primary education are important targets for the Millennium Development Goals<br />

(MDGs) (<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-08 and 2010-11).<br />

3


While the overall youth literacy rate is 73%, amongst males it is 79% and amongst females 68%.<br />

Gender disparities exist <strong>in</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> residence. 76% <strong>of</strong> rural males are literate compared to 58 % <strong>of</strong><br />

rural females. The younger population, aged 15-19, is slightly less literate than those aged 20-24:<br />

amongst males, 80% compared to 78% and amongst females 70 % compared to 66%. The highest<br />

wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile has the highest youth literacy rate, especially amongst women and girls:<br />

amongst males, the highest wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile has a literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 94% compared to 52% <strong>in</strong> the<br />

lowest and amongst females 95% compared to 19%. Literacy rates <strong>of</strong> household members above 15<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age is more than half (56%) <strong>of</strong> whom are literate. Amongst males, the literacy rate at 66%<br />

is 21% higher than amongst females (45%). Variations <strong>in</strong> literacy rate <strong>in</strong> 15+ age group is similar<br />

to those <strong>in</strong> 10+ with lower rates, <strong>in</strong> rural areas particularly for males(Literacy& NFBED 2011,<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, PSLM 2007-08 and 2010-11).<br />

The gender gap is slightly narrower <strong>in</strong> major cities and <strong>in</strong> other urban areas. The district variations<br />

<strong>in</strong> literacy rates amongst 15+ year-olds are similar to those amongst 10+ year-olds. More than half<br />

(59%) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> population above 10 years is literate, with a clear, sharp differential between<br />

males (69%) and females (50 %). Literacy (10+ years) varies considerably between urban and rural<br />

areas, with about half (52%) <strong>of</strong> rural-dwellers literate compared to 77% <strong>in</strong> major cities and 72% <strong>in</strong><br />

other urban areas. Gender disparities also exist by area <strong>of</strong> residence. In rural areas 64 % males are<br />

literate compared to only 40% females. The gender gap is slightly narrower <strong>in</strong> major cities (males<br />

81%; females 74%) and <strong>in</strong> other urban areas (males 78%; females 65%). Literacy amongst people<br />

over 10 years <strong>of</strong> age <strong>in</strong>creases where the older population is less literate than the younger. While<br />

there is the expected positive correlation with education, <strong>of</strong> those who have never attended school<br />

(47% <strong>of</strong> the 10+population), 37% reported that they are literate. Literacy rates (10+ years) were<br />

highest <strong>in</strong> the districts <strong>of</strong> Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di (80%), Jhelum (77%), Lahore and Gujrat (74%) and lowest <strong>in</strong><br />

Rajanpur (33%), D.G. Khan, Rahim Yar Khan and Lodhran (44%) (<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics,<br />

2011, Literacy & NFBED, 2011)<br />

1.2: Overall development context and development priorities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Role and<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> social and economic development <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

The whole paradigm <strong>of</strong> development squarely h<strong>in</strong>ges upon education and human resource<br />

development lead<strong>in</strong>g to social capital formation. <strong>Education</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> the vital sectors, play<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pivotal role <strong>in</strong> socio-economic development <strong>of</strong> a country. <strong>Education</strong> plays a decisive role <strong>in</strong><br />

build<strong>in</strong>g human capabilities to accelerate economic growth through knowledge, creativity,<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation and skills. <strong>Education</strong> is s<strong>in</strong>e qua non to create awareness, tolerance, self-esteem and<br />

confidence to empower people to defend their rights. <strong>Education</strong> helps <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g knowledge based<br />

societies and knowledge based learn<strong>in</strong>g organizations. <strong>Education</strong> is not just preparation for life but a<br />

life <strong>in</strong> itself (Malik, 2006) 7 .<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has chalked out a roadmap and adopted a strategy for 100% enrollment<br />

<strong>of</strong> school-go<strong>in</strong>g-age children and their retention 8 . The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has declared,<br />

‘<strong>Education</strong> Emergency’ and <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap by the Chief M<strong>in</strong>ster aim to ensure good<br />

governance, equity, access and quality <strong>of</strong> education. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the roadmap are:<br />

• Every child enrolls <strong>in</strong> school<br />

• Every child is reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> school<br />

• Every child learns and makes progress<br />

7<br />

8<br />

Malik, A. B (2006c) - The Human Development Nexus-Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development and Capacity Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Public<br />

Private Partnership, Maqbool Academy, Lahore. Pakistan<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister Secretariat, Lahore 2010<br />

4


Box-1: <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap<br />

The roadmap document focuses on improv<strong>in</strong>g Government schools by reach<strong>in</strong>g the prov<strong>in</strong>ce’s education<br />

goals and expands <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation (PEF) as well as strengthen<strong>in</strong>g Government schools. PEF<br />

will support greater number <strong>of</strong> children as soon as possible while rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g targeted and ensur<strong>in</strong>g quality.<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> and the present political leadership is <strong>of</strong> the considered view that <strong>in</strong> two<br />

years, <strong>Punjab</strong> can make a “quantum leap” <strong>in</strong> educational outcome. The roadmap <strong>in</strong>tends to dispel some<br />

myths i.e.<br />

• “Children do not attend school because their families are too poor”<br />

• “ The ma<strong>in</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>t is f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g; with more money the system would improve”<br />

• “What we need is a set <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>in</strong>itiatives that will get children <strong>in</strong>to school”<br />

The roadmap essentially concentrates on an effective eng<strong>in</strong>e for school reforms:<br />

• Strong central coord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

• Teacher and school leader support<br />

• Scripted lessons and engag<strong>in</strong>g material<br />

• Incentives for high performance<br />

• Students basic needs fulfillment<br />

• High caliber management staff<br />

• Universal standards and curriculum<br />

• Student assessment<br />

• Regular and reliable data collection<br />

• Competitive compensation for teachers 9<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g implementation strategy for the roadmap has been chalked out:<br />

• Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister Secretariat<br />

• Ensure that education reform is a priority<br />

• Manage the CM’s <strong>in</strong>teractions with the system<br />

• Help to unblock any obstacles to progress<br />

• Secretary Schools<br />

• Take overall responsibility for school reform<br />

• Design programs and support districts <strong>in</strong> implementation<br />

• District Managers<br />

• Take responsibility for achievement <strong>of</strong> district targets<br />

• Implement centrally designed programs<br />

• PMIU and PEC<br />

• Monitor progress <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g the roadmap<br />

• Monitor schools for quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>puts and outcomes and provide data for student<br />

achievement<br />

• Share data and reports with the system<br />

• External Partners<br />

• Provide technical support and <strong>in</strong>ternational knowledge to the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and districts <strong>in</strong> the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> advice, coach<strong>in</strong>g and formal tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. The roadmap targeted to achieve the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g objectives:<br />

1. Set targets and build rout<strong>in</strong>es to monitor progress<br />

2. Improve district effectiveness<br />

3. Provide high quality teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and teach<strong>in</strong>g guides<br />

4. Expand the impact <strong>of</strong> the PEF<br />

5. Critical support<strong>in</strong>g actions are merg<strong>in</strong>g boys and girls schools, improv<strong>in</strong>g teacher transfer<br />

system, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the reliability and regularity <strong>of</strong> data, communicat<strong>in</strong>g the reform agenda<br />

and improv<strong>in</strong>g school leadership<br />

The leadership is the most important ‘secret <strong>in</strong>gredient’ for translat<strong>in</strong>g good education policies <strong>in</strong>to results.<br />

In the face <strong>of</strong> a dire emergency, leaders at every level from Secretaries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Education</strong> Departments to the<br />

head teachers <strong>in</strong> each school – will need to work together to create an education system that delivers. In the<br />

medium term, <strong>Punjab</strong> will need to spend more money on education if it is to meet its education goals and <strong>in</strong><br />

the long term, there has to be consistency <strong>in</strong> policies.<br />

9<br />

How the world’s most improved school systems keep gett<strong>in</strong>g better (2010)<br />

5


Box-2: Public Private Partnership <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

Government alone will not be able to accomplish the gigantic task <strong>of</strong> atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>volve and<br />

facilitate Non-State Providers (NSPs) for extend<strong>in</strong>g access, equity and quality. There is greater sensitivity to<br />

facilitate private sector by f<strong>in</strong>ancial, adm<strong>in</strong>istrative and management empowerment and autonomous<br />

academic leadership through Public Private Partnership (PPP). The idea is to ensure trust-based synergy and<br />

synchronization culm<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a longeval w<strong>in</strong>-w<strong>in</strong> situation. The evidence and practices from PEF have<br />

suggested that PPP is extremely successful. Efficient private sector leadership facilitated by public sector<br />

f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g securely <strong>in</strong>tegrates and bleeds <strong>in</strong>to an optimal level <strong>of</strong> service delivery, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> better learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

outcomes, less drop-outs, ensured presence <strong>of</strong> teachers and no truancy 10 . PEF, Foundation Assisted School<br />

Model is one <strong>of</strong> the replicable models for affordable quality education <strong>in</strong> Public Private Partnership 11<br />

International experience demonstrates that change is <strong>in</strong>evitable and rapid change at gallop<strong>in</strong>g pace<br />

is possible:<br />

• Chile <strong>in</strong>creased its primary enrolment from 74% to 95% <strong>in</strong> less than twenty years.<br />

• The Indian state <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh taught an additional 2.5 million Grade 5 children to<br />

read <strong>in</strong> just two years.<br />

• In M<strong>in</strong>as Geris, Brazil, the literacy rate among 8 year olds jumped from 49% to 73% just <strong>in</strong><br />

three years after a reform programme was launched.<br />

If Pakistan followed the path forged by other pioneers <strong>of</strong> education reform, it could expect to start<br />

see<strong>in</strong>g results with<strong>in</strong> two years 12 . The concern for education is deeply rooted <strong>in</strong> Pakistan’s history.<br />

In 1947, <strong>in</strong> his message to the All-Pakistan <strong>Education</strong> Conference, the Quaid-e-Azam warned that<br />

“The future <strong>of</strong> our state will and must greatly depend upon the type <strong>of</strong> education and the way <strong>in</strong><br />

which we br<strong>in</strong>g up our children as the future servants <strong>of</strong> Pakistan”. The Conference agreed that<br />

Pakistan should provide free and compulsory education to all children. Pakistan has had n<strong>in</strong>e<br />

education policies, each <strong>of</strong> which has set similar targets. None <strong>of</strong> these policies has attracted the<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ed political will needed to turn aspirations <strong>in</strong>to better education. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to a study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world’s fastest improv<strong>in</strong>g school systems, three factors are most likely to trigger a successful<br />

programme <strong>of</strong> education reform 13 :-<br />

• A political or economic crisis.<br />

• The impact <strong>of</strong> a high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile, critical report on the education system’s performance.<br />

• The energy <strong>of</strong> a determ<strong>in</strong>ed political or education leader (or both).<br />

1.3: Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Development Priorities and the Vision 2030<br />

A vision is like a dream but visionary leadership can foresee the wide open horizon for a just,<br />

developed, prosperous and susta<strong>in</strong>ed growth, possess grit and attributes to lead the people forward.<br />

The Vision 2030 by Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> for education is, ‘An educated <strong>Punjab</strong>, with<br />

impeccable pr<strong>of</strong>essional knowledge management lead<strong>in</strong>g to knowledge workers, knowledge<br />

economy and knowledge society’. It is the stated policy <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> that by the<br />

Year 2030 every citizen <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce will be literate, learned and prosperous. Developed,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrialized and prosperous <strong>Punjab</strong>, rapidly develop<strong>in</strong>g through the optimal utilization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

available resources is the ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> Vision 2030. Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>, envisage the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Pakistan <strong>in</strong> letter and<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

Malik, A B (2007) Freedom <strong>of</strong> Choice: Affordable Quality <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Public Private Partnership<br />

Asian Development Bank (2010), Public Private Partnerships – Lessons Learned from <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Foundation http://www.adb.org/documents/reports/ppp-education-punjab/ppp-education-punjab.pdf<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister Secretariat, Lahore 2010<br />

The Pakistan <strong>Education</strong> Task Force (2010): <strong>Education</strong> Emergency Pakistan: March For <strong>Education</strong>.<br />

www.educationemergency.com.pk<br />

6


spirit. The Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> looks at the Constitutional Development as a challenge as<br />

well as an opportunity <strong>in</strong> unison with the goals and objectives <strong>of</strong> Vision 2030.<br />

The Vision 2030 for <strong>Punjab</strong> has been developed through a consultative process. It presents a<br />

strategic framework for overcom<strong>in</strong>g obstacles and challenges stand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the way <strong>of</strong> the preferred<br />

future chosen by the people <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. <strong>Punjab</strong> aims to achieve the stated vision with<strong>in</strong> a<br />

generation, <strong>in</strong> a manner that susta<strong>in</strong>s a high quality <strong>of</strong> life and provides equal opportunities to its<br />

citizens to reach their true potential. <strong>Punjab</strong> plans to meet contemporary and future challenges by<br />

deploy<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>in</strong>puts and human social capital. Its goals reflect the aspirations and potential<br />

<strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> a fast-chang<strong>in</strong>g world. The Vision 2030 policy<br />

framework considers a range <strong>of</strong> concomitant strategic alignments. The underly<strong>in</strong>g theme is to<br />

embrace needed transformation and to create new opportunities based on strengths and optimal<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> resources. The citizens will have greater access to quality education, as well as basic<br />

amenities like health, water and sanitation. Freedom <strong>of</strong> enterprise and enlarged opportunities will<br />

have the potential transform the lives <strong>of</strong> the majority but the benefit <strong>of</strong> social protection will also<br />

provide sufficient cushion to the most vulnerable, neglected, less-affluent, marg<strong>in</strong>alized, un-reached<br />

and disenfranchised. Vision 2030 acknowledges the forces <strong>of</strong> globalization and dispersion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>formation and technology, which are likely to change the scale and character <strong>of</strong> human enterprise.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has a stoic resolve that by 2030, human lives, workplaces, education,<br />

skills, trade and competition would stand transformed and revitalized. Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tends to make a mark <strong>in</strong> the various fields <strong>of</strong> knowledge which can add value to endeavors.<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong>tends to transform its <strong>in</strong>stitutions and structures as well as national policies, priorities and<br />

goals, by convert<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>in</strong>to a socio-economic enterprise. The acquisition and<br />

dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> knowledge and the quest for excellence will be the driv<strong>in</strong>g force <strong>of</strong> future dest<strong>in</strong>y.<br />

The Vision 2030 is demand<strong>in</strong>g and simple and at the same time focuses at the transform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

society and economy, dedicated to the assimilation and generation <strong>of</strong> knowledge and harness<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

technology. There is <strong>in</strong>dubitable belief, to build on successes which are not few but many <strong>in</strong><br />

diverse fields. Through Vision 2030, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong>tends to develop the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and<br />

the development will be measured by economic growth as well as the quality <strong>of</strong> life, enjoyed by its<br />

people and to evolve <strong>in</strong>to a tolerant and productive society, which is at peace with itself and with<br />

the rest <strong>of</strong> the country and the world, with<strong>in</strong> a framework <strong>of</strong> sovereignty and security.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong>tends to establish the rule <strong>of</strong> law as a bedrock pr<strong>in</strong>ciple impact<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

all walks <strong>of</strong> life and encourage freedom <strong>of</strong> enterprise and <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> the market place together<br />

with state responsibility for the provision <strong>of</strong> basic services to all citizens, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g education,<br />

healthcare, water and sanitation, shelter and security under law. <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong>tends to make<br />

employment and employability, a central theme <strong>in</strong> economic and social policies, with special<br />

emphasis on the rights <strong>of</strong> women and elim<strong>in</strong>ate absolute poverty and ensure social protection for<br />

the weak and the vulnerable by generat<strong>in</strong>g and absorb<strong>in</strong>g knowledge and harness technology for the<br />

good <strong>of</strong> all while promot<strong>in</strong>g social sciences and humanities as an essential branch <strong>of</strong> knowledge.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong>tends to prepare for the dynamics and imperatives <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> large<br />

cities, urban concentrations and expected migration.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> also <strong>in</strong>tends to achieve significant breakthrough <strong>in</strong> the sectors <strong>of</strong><br />

education, employment and energy while consolidat<strong>in</strong>g and expand<strong>in</strong>g the gather<strong>in</strong>g momentum <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure and service sectors. In the field <strong>of</strong> education specifically, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

has prepared prov<strong>in</strong>cial and district level strategies for ensur<strong>in</strong>g access, quality equity and good<br />

governance <strong>in</strong> education sector. Establishment <strong>of</strong> new standards for school <strong>in</strong>frastructure, facilities<br />

and staff to reflect quality considerations and conduct<strong>in</strong>g a fresh survey <strong>of</strong> all schools for<br />

benchmark<strong>in</strong>g and better plann<strong>in</strong>g will be the roadmap. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong>tends to<br />

improve the access <strong>of</strong> girls to schools at all levels through the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>centive systems<br />

7


such as food-for-education, stipends for less-developed districts and improve the retention rates and<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ate truancy patterns <strong>of</strong> students from class 1 to class X by revitaliz<strong>in</strong>g the curricula and by<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g these more relevant to current days and by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g the basics <strong>of</strong> vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to<br />

provide an early exit to vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or technical education on a full time basis.<br />

8<br />

Box-3: <strong>Education</strong> as Development Priority: The Vision 2030<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the process <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> Vision 2030, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> is determ<strong>in</strong>ed to discourage<br />

drop outs <strong>in</strong> schools by provision <strong>of</strong> a child-friendly, conducive and congenial environment through bann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

corporal punishment, rationaliz<strong>in</strong>g excessive textbooks and workloads and improv<strong>in</strong>g the skills <strong>of</strong> teachers away<br />

from rote learn<strong>in</strong>g to student-centered learn<strong>in</strong>g and adopt<strong>in</strong>g a district-based and cluster-centered system <strong>of</strong><br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> teachers along with <strong>in</strong>centives and accountability for improv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> education. The development, test<strong>in</strong>g and production <strong>of</strong> textbooks will be improved by <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong><br />

outside expertise and by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g greater diversity and competition and the process should be better regulated<br />

by education authorities by establish<strong>in</strong>g public sector’s regulatory and facilitation, monitor<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

standardization framework for private provision <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> a non-<strong>in</strong>trusive manner with m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />

<strong>in</strong>terference and with emphasis on provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation to households and other players enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to<br />

make <strong>in</strong>formed choices related to education. Public Private Partnership models demonstrated by PEF could be<br />

replicated which are cost effective and economical. The prov<strong>in</strong>ce will be establish<strong>in</strong>g standards, monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

performance and regulat<strong>in</strong>g both the private and the devolved public sector establishments. <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong>tends<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> old municipal schools under urban disadvantaged areas improvement program, creation <strong>of</strong><br />

clusters for better school management and teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure for creation <strong>of</strong><br />

school districts concept and improvements to be made to the exist<strong>in</strong>g education test<strong>in</strong>g service to ensure a<br />

uniformity <strong>in</strong> the output from the education sector and to evaluate teacher skills.<br />

A genu<strong>in</strong>e education reform requires political will translated <strong>in</strong>to actual practical theatrics by<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> more resources. After the <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the Constitution, there is an<br />

urgency to enforce the justifiable right to education. Government must enhance budgetary allocation<br />

for education to ensure the implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap. Quality education needs<br />

quality <strong>in</strong>stitutions and qualified human resource <strong>in</strong> education sector. There is a dire need to<br />

standardize the entry requirements <strong>in</strong>to pr<strong>of</strong>essional and technical <strong>in</strong>stitutions to match the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational standards for compatibility. The prov<strong>in</strong>cial government must use the National<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>g Service to standardize the entry requirements to Higher Secondary and Tertiary<br />

educational establishments and to verify the skills atta<strong>in</strong>ed by teachers at various levels.<br />

The relationship between the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government and district governments must change <strong>in</strong> favor<br />

<strong>of</strong> greater decentralization <strong>of</strong> functions, staff and resources and the establishment <strong>of</strong> performancebased<br />

relationships <strong>in</strong>centivized through the general and conditional grant mechanism. The<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial government must encourage the district governments to implement necessary changes by<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g them with an <strong>in</strong>centive for a limited time dur<strong>in</strong>g which the change should be<br />

implemented. It may reta<strong>in</strong> the functions relat<strong>in</strong>g to the enunciation <strong>of</strong> policy, the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

standards, regulatory and monitor<strong>in</strong>g frameworks, the enactment <strong>of</strong> laws to encourage private sector<br />

participation, the oversight <strong>of</strong> curricula and syllabi revision and the production <strong>of</strong> textbooks. The<br />

capacity for evidence-based plann<strong>in</strong>g needs to be upgraded at the district level and given current<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts, the prov<strong>in</strong>ce has to play a lead role <strong>in</strong> this capacity build<strong>in</strong>g and service delivery<br />

mechanism. Moreover the structure <strong>of</strong> the district education <strong>of</strong>fice needs to be reorganized from<br />

gender/facility wide classification (male/ female primary, secondary, colleges) to the one based on<br />

functional specialization (human resource management, monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation, student<br />

assessment etc.). Aga<strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce has to take a lead <strong>in</strong> this reorganization dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> Vision 2030.<br />

There is a consensus among development practitioners that education is the most significant<br />

variable <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g poverty and <strong>in</strong>equality. It is a truism that education is the only factor to


trampol<strong>in</strong>e all sectors <strong>of</strong> an economy simultaneously. There is unanimity <strong>of</strong> views that education<br />

galvanizes and ensures equity, social cohesion, productive efficiency, freedom <strong>of</strong> choice and good<br />

governance <strong>in</strong> a society. The benefits <strong>of</strong> education are not only conf<strong>in</strong>ed to the national economy<br />

but <strong>in</strong>dividuals also benefit from it. Develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, where majority <strong>of</strong> the world’s population<br />

resides, need to redesign educational policies for promot<strong>in</strong>g productivity and efficiency <strong>in</strong> different<br />

sectors <strong>of</strong> the economy by high skilled knowledge workers. It is the rapid concentration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

knowledge workers that can address <strong>in</strong>cessant developmental needs and accelerate rapid<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrialization, culm<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> prosperity.<br />

There is a remarkable unanimity <strong>of</strong> views throughout the world now that the quality <strong>of</strong> education <strong>of</strong><br />

a nation will be the chief determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> its success dur<strong>in</strong>g this century and beyond. Sir W<strong>in</strong>ston<br />

Churchill rightly proclaimed, “The empires <strong>of</strong> the future are the empires <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d”. This belief is<br />

based on the fact that a nation cannot progress morally, politically, socially, technologically and<br />

economically without quality educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions at all levels. <strong>Education</strong> is an essential prerequisite<br />

and basic build<strong>in</strong>g block for the social capital formation and human resource development.<br />

<strong>Education</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> the vital sectors, play<strong>in</strong>g pivotal role <strong>in</strong> socio-economic development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

country. <strong>Education</strong> plays a decisive role <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g human capabilities to accelerate economic<br />

growth through knowledge, creativity, <strong>in</strong>novation and skills (Malik, 2006 14 ).<br />

1.4: New <strong>in</strong>itiatives by Government: Impact Assessment and <strong>Policy</strong> Implications<br />

Elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> educational apartheid and promotion <strong>of</strong> affordable and equitable quality education is<br />

the constitutional responsibility <strong>of</strong> the state 15 . Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is committed to make serious<br />

and strenuous efforts to improve access, quality, equity and governance <strong>in</strong> education sector by<br />

enhanc<strong>in</strong>g education facilities with<strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum possible time. Appropriate policies have been<br />

formulated and strategies devised to achieve the cherished national goal <strong>of</strong> quality education for all.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the best <strong>in</strong>itiatives is <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap, aimed at achiev<strong>in</strong>g 100% enrollment,<br />

retention and literacy. The critics have however, serious reservations about the achievement <strong>of</strong> goals<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap with<strong>in</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> 2 years. They are <strong>of</strong> the view that <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

arrangement does not exist to accommodate all the out-<strong>of</strong>-school children <strong>in</strong> public, private and non<br />

-formal schools. Without enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the capacity and <strong>in</strong>frastructure along with human resource, the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap will be noth<strong>in</strong>g but another political slogan. The results <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

have to be yet verified by a Third Party Evaluation (TPE). The <strong>in</strong>terim reports submitted by EDOs<br />

<strong>Education</strong> and verified by District Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Officers (DMOs) are however, very encourag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce 60% <strong>of</strong> the districts <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> have achieved the 100% enrollment <strong>of</strong> school go<strong>in</strong>g age<br />

children.<br />

Private sector <strong>in</strong> education <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has progressed at an unprecedented pace not only <strong>in</strong> the<br />

history <strong>of</strong> the country but also <strong>in</strong> the South Asian Regional Countries 16 . 89.1% <strong>of</strong> Government<br />

Schools are <strong>in</strong> rural areas. In case <strong>of</strong> Lahore District, the number <strong>of</strong> private school is 7800 whereas<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> public school is 1392. Similarly <strong>in</strong> other urban areas and large cities, the number <strong>of</strong><br />

private schools is higher than Government schools (PMIU-PESRP 2011). Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> has started support<strong>in</strong>g low cost private sector schools through <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation.<br />

After the <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the Constitution, the budgetary allocation for <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> Foundation has been doubled from Rs 4 billion to Rs 8 billion per annum. This will<br />

facilitate the low cost private sector to play a pivotal role for the enrollment and retention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

Malik, A. B (2006) <strong>Education</strong> Voucher Scheme - The Hope, Quarterly Journal (Volume-II) <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Foundation, Lahore, Pakistan<br />

Malik, A B (2007) Freedom <strong>of</strong> Choice: Affordable Quality <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Public Private Partnership<br />

National <strong>Education</strong> Census 2006<br />

9


students <strong>in</strong> schools s<strong>in</strong>ce the enrollment level <strong>in</strong> PEF model is l<strong>in</strong>ked with the monthly<br />

disbursements to schools.<br />

The budgetary allocations by successive regimes and education as prioritized agenda demonstrated<br />

the political will <strong>of</strong> the Governments, generally mismatched with the stated policies. The<br />

Government has progressively <strong>in</strong>creased the education budget but still it is one <strong>of</strong> the lowest <strong>in</strong><br />

South-East Asia. In addition to low budgetary allocation malaise, education sector is fac<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

myriad challenges <strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> allocated meager resources, f<strong>in</strong>ancial management; capacity<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g, pr<strong>of</strong>essional development and <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> performance, required to translate the policies<br />

and strategies <strong>of</strong> the governments <strong>in</strong> power <strong>in</strong>to reality <strong>in</strong> a suave manner. Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> has shown political commitment to br<strong>in</strong>g improvements <strong>in</strong> the education sector. This is<br />

evident from enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the allocation <strong>of</strong> budget for education from Rs. 9,200 million <strong>in</strong> FY 2006<br />

to Rs. 21,480 million <strong>in</strong> FY 2008 as a step forward to meet the MDGs and EFA Goals. <strong>Punjab</strong> is<br />

better placed than other prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> targets relat<strong>in</strong>g to UPE primarily<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the success <strong>of</strong> PESRP 17 and the rapid growth <strong>of</strong> private school<strong>in</strong>g. While partially<br />

address<strong>in</strong>g access issues, major issues perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to quality, equity, governance and <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

failures rema<strong>in</strong> outstand<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

In order to address the issues <strong>of</strong> quality, EDOs <strong>Education</strong> at district level have been selected<br />

through Search Committees and criteria for selection was approved by the CM <strong>Punjab</strong>. This is for<br />

the first time <strong>in</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce that selection process <strong>of</strong> EDOs has been made absolutely<br />

transparent. The malaise <strong>of</strong> political <strong>in</strong>terference for the post<strong>in</strong>g and transfers <strong>of</strong> EDOs has been<br />

effectively checked. The Directorate <strong>of</strong> Staff Development (DSD) has been restructured to ensure<br />

quality <strong>in</strong>struction for pre-service and <strong>in</strong>-service pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> teachers and senior<br />

educators. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has entered <strong>in</strong>to an agreement with Government College<br />

University (GCU) Lahore for the management tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> senior managers <strong>of</strong> the education<br />

department. The majority <strong>of</strong> the EDOs selected by the Search Committee are the graduates <strong>of</strong> GCU<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, equipped with the latest concepts and management tools. The<br />

managerial, adm<strong>in</strong>istrative and academics empowerment at district level will surely impact the<br />

service delivery mechanism. The critics however, argue that with the change <strong>of</strong> political regime, the<br />

system will come back and the role <strong>of</strong> Search Committees will be over. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, the<br />

Search Committees have been given cover through a policy framework and it will be difficult for<br />

any political regime to reverse the process.<br />

In order to ensure transparent and qualitative assessment, there was an <strong>in</strong>cessant need for a<br />

workable and viable <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangement. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> restructured Boards <strong>of</strong><br />

Intermediate and Secondary <strong>Education</strong> and <strong>Punjab</strong> Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Commission <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

Previously there was no <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangement to assess the learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes <strong>of</strong> the students by<br />

an external body till a student reached Grade-9. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> established <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Commission (PEC) to assess the learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes <strong>of</strong> the students at the term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

stage <strong>of</strong> Primary and Elementary <strong>Education</strong>. PEC tabulates results school-wise and subject-wise.<br />

The compensat<strong>in</strong>g feedback helps School <strong>Education</strong> Department to realign the policy, supply-side<br />

<strong>in</strong>puts and carryout readjustments. It is compulsory for the students <strong>of</strong> Grade-5 and Grade-8 <strong>of</strong> all<br />

17<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector Reforms Program (PESRP). PESRP endeavored to set up Program Monitor<strong>in</strong>g &<br />

Implementation Unit (PMIU). PMIU successfully designed many academic and program <strong>in</strong>terventions and liaised<br />

with the World Bank and other <strong>in</strong>ternational organizations <strong>in</strong> a very suave and poised manner to <strong>in</strong>troduce PESRP<br />

framework, enhance access, equity and quality <strong>of</strong> education, improve education sector good governance and quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> education, ensure appropriate budgetary allocations, ensure better fiduciary environment, <strong>in</strong>stitutional endeavor<br />

to enhance allocations for education and improve sub-sector allocation on need basis and prioritize as and when<br />

need arises.<br />

10


public, private and non-formal schools to appear <strong>in</strong> PEC Exam<strong>in</strong>ation. Textbooks are very<br />

important variable on supply-side <strong>in</strong>puts. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has revisited the public policy<br />

for the contents and methodology for the syllabus and curriculum. <strong>Punjab</strong> Textbook Board (PTB)<br />

has been tasked to re-evaluate and suggest the modern techniques for the compilation and pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> the textbooks. PTB has completed the exercise and Government has approved the suggestions for<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> textbooks by engag<strong>in</strong>g the most able m<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>in</strong> academia. The <strong>in</strong>tervention will have<br />

a far reach<strong>in</strong>g effect on the quality <strong>of</strong> education.<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Evaluation (M&E) is absolutely essential for the development <strong>in</strong>itiatives especially<br />

social sector programmes like education. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has established Project<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Implementation Unit (PMIU) for M&E <strong>of</strong> the education sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. District<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Officers (DMOs) directly report to PMIU while keep<strong>in</strong>g EDOs and District<br />

Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Officers (DCOs) <strong>in</strong> the loop. DMOs monitor presence <strong>of</strong> teachers, attendance <strong>in</strong><br />

cluster based tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g workshops for cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development, distribution textbooks<br />

and stipends and overall implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> Schools Roadmap. M&E has helped the<br />

department to cont<strong>in</strong>uously monitor and the other stakeholders are also shar<strong>in</strong>g the monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

reports at districts, prov<strong>in</strong>cial and PMIU level.<br />

The implementation <strong>of</strong> the education sector programme is discussed at the highest forum, by CM<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong>. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the monthly review meet<strong>in</strong>gs, all the heads <strong>of</strong> concerned departments are present.<br />

The decisions taken <strong>in</strong> the meet<strong>in</strong>gs are pursued for implementation and report by the Chief<br />

Secretary <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong> the monthly Secretaries Committee Meet<strong>in</strong>g and Commissioners Conference.<br />

This shows the political and pr<strong>of</strong>essional commitment for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> School<br />

Roadmap by the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

In order to benefit from the <strong>in</strong>ternational best practices to improve quality <strong>of</strong> education, the role <strong>of</strong><br />

external partners is <strong>of</strong> pivotal importance <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has engaged<br />

external partners like Department for International Development (DFID) and The World Bank not<br />

only as donors but also as partners <strong>in</strong> implementation. As a consequence, DFID and The World<br />

Bank provided technical and pr<strong>of</strong>essional assistance for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> School<br />

Roadmap. A bimonthly conference <strong>of</strong> external partners with the Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> all heads <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Departments along with F<strong>in</strong>ance, Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Development<br />

Departments, has proved an effective check for M&E. The <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements are reviewed<br />

and policy guidel<strong>in</strong>es are circulated to the heads <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Departments with clear deadl<strong>in</strong>es to<br />

achieve the goals.<br />

In order to ensure equity, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has <strong>in</strong>troduced Danish School System and<br />

Centers <strong>of</strong> Excellence <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The Danish Schools are for the poorest <strong>of</strong> the poor and<br />

orphan children <strong>in</strong> the remote rural areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister particularly emphasized on the<br />

quality education for the poor segment <strong>of</strong> the society and started from the Southern <strong>Punjab</strong>. By now<br />

6 model schools are operational <strong>in</strong> R.Y. Khan, Hasilpur and Chishtian. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

has expressed resolve to open more schools throughout the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. A separate <strong>in</strong>dependent body<br />

for Danish Schools and Centers <strong>of</strong> Excellence has been established. The critics are <strong>of</strong> the view that<br />

an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs 8 billion has been spent on this project and open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the hundreds <strong>of</strong> new schools<br />

would have been possible with this amount. The present regime has however, responded to this<br />

criticism by po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out that why critics were silent when elite schools like Aitcheson College,<br />

Public Schools and Cadet Colleges were be<strong>in</strong>g established for the affluent classes. The Government<br />

has shunned the criticism and is determ<strong>in</strong>ed to scale up the programme.<br />

Despite <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap strategy, access to schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> still rema<strong>in</strong>s a serious issue<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> remote rural areas and urban slums. The implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A requires free<br />

and compulsory education up to secondary level. This requires more <strong>in</strong>frastructure, teachers,<br />

11


educational managers and secretariat staff. There is a dire need to emphasize on consolidation <strong>of</strong><br />

public school <strong>in</strong>frastructure, target<strong>in</strong>g drop-out rates, absenteeism, truancy, pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development <strong>of</strong> teachers and education managers, accelerate <strong>in</strong>stitutional reforms and improve<br />

equity and quality.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has resolved to ensure good governance <strong>in</strong> education and the post<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

EDOs <strong>Education</strong> on merit is a clear manifestation <strong>of</strong> the resolve. The processes <strong>of</strong> transparency and<br />

accountability have been <strong>in</strong>troduced at the systemic level. The promotion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficers has been<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ked to performance through quantifiable, measureable and verifiable <strong>in</strong>dicators. At policy level<br />

the system <strong>of</strong> retribution and reward has been <strong>in</strong>troduced and the best performers at school and<br />

district level have been given honorarium <strong>in</strong> the shape <strong>of</strong> cash awards. The <strong>in</strong>centive has served as<br />

motivation and encouragement to the workforce <strong>in</strong> education sector. The high achievers, both<br />

students and faculty have been recognized and rewarded. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has established<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Endowment Fund (PEEF), particularly for the encouragement <strong>of</strong> high achiever <strong>in</strong><br />

Matriculation/O Level and Intermediate/A Level students. The high achievers are not only<br />

recognized and patronized at national level but have also been <strong>in</strong>troduced at <strong>in</strong>ternational level by<br />

send<strong>in</strong>g them to the Centers <strong>of</strong> Excellence around the globe at the state expense. The <strong>in</strong>itiative has<br />

not only given exposure but has also encouraged the hard work<strong>in</strong>g students and high achievers.<br />

September 16, 2011 will be marked as a red letter day <strong>in</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the country for issuance <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Jo<strong>in</strong>t Declaration signed by the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister S<strong>in</strong>dh, Governor and<br />

Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister Baluchistan, M<strong>in</strong>ister for <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>,<br />

Prime M<strong>in</strong>istry AJK and M<strong>in</strong>ister for <strong>Education</strong> Gilgit-Baltistan. The Jo<strong>in</strong>t Declaration for<br />

education is the political commitment and ownership for accord<strong>in</strong>g priority to education <strong>in</strong> Pakistan,<br />

striv<strong>in</strong>g to achieve MDGs and EFA Goals.<br />

Box-4: Jo<strong>in</strong>t Declaration on <strong>Education</strong><br />

We, the elected leaders <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> Pakistan and the Governments <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>, S<strong>in</strong>dh, Khyber<br />

Pukhtunkhwa. Baluchistan, Azad Jammu Kashmir, and Gilgit-Baltistan, hereby declare that:<br />

• The Federal and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governments reaffirm their commitment to<br />

<strong>Education</strong> as a priority.<br />

• National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2009, subject to such adaptations as are necessitated <strong>in</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the 18 th<br />

Constitutional Amendment, shall cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be jo<strong>in</strong>tly owned national document.<br />

• <strong>Education</strong> is a fundamental right <strong>of</strong> all children aged 5-16, guaranteed through Article 25A <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, follow<strong>in</strong>g the Constitutional Amendment, which<br />

received assent on April 19, 2010; Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governments shall enact legislation for the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25A.<br />

• Each prov<strong>in</strong>ce/area shall develop an Action Plan which shall commit to appropriately raise allocations<br />

for education, set priorities accord<strong>in</strong>g to prov<strong>in</strong>cial needs <strong>of</strong> access and quality <strong>of</strong> education and<br />

provide implementation strategies/processes with timeframe and key <strong>in</strong>dicators; ensure fulfillment <strong>of</strong><br />

constitutional needs with respect to education and meet the <strong>in</strong>ternational commitments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

targets <strong>of</strong> Millennium Development Goals (MOGs) and <strong>Education</strong> for All (EFA)<br />

• The Plann<strong>in</strong>g System (the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Plann<strong>in</strong>g Departments, and <strong>Education</strong><br />

Departments) shall be jo<strong>in</strong>tly the secretariat for the <strong>Education</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ister’s Conference.<br />

• Each year a high level National Summit on <strong>Education</strong> shall be convened to review progress dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

year and take decisions to further improve the situation to achieve national and <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

commitments.<br />

12


Chapter-2:<br />

2.1: <strong>Education</strong> Policies <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>: Constitution <strong>of</strong> Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Pakistan 1973,<br />

Articles 37-B & Article 25-A - New Constitutional Provisions and Impact on <strong>Education</strong><br />

Policies.<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Pakistan has historically featured prom<strong>in</strong>ently <strong>in</strong> the constitutional frameworks.<br />

Though the federal government assumed the role <strong>of</strong> policy formulation and at times macro plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

till 1973 it rema<strong>in</strong>ed mostly a prov<strong>in</strong>cial subject. Government <strong>of</strong> India Act 1935, which was adopted<br />

as the provisional/<strong>in</strong>terim constitution 18 <strong>of</strong> Pakistan <strong>in</strong> 1947 under the Indian Independence Act<br />

1947 and it rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> force till the adoption <strong>of</strong> Constitution <strong>of</strong> 1956. The Act provided three<br />

legislative lists namely; federal, concurrent, and prov<strong>in</strong>cial. The subject <strong>of</strong> education featured <strong>in</strong> the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial legislative list. <strong>Education</strong> or related affairs were neither the part <strong>of</strong> the concurrent<br />

legislative list nor the federal legislative list. The first Constitution <strong>of</strong> Pakistan adopted <strong>in</strong> 1956 also<br />

had three legislative lists and education (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g university education, technical education, and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g) was assigned to the prov<strong>in</strong>ces. 1962 Constitution provided for a Presidential<br />

form <strong>of</strong> government and a s<strong>in</strong>gle legislative list <strong>of</strong> 49 federal subjects was provided <strong>in</strong> the<br />

constitution. Although education was mentioned <strong>in</strong> Fundamental Rights under Chapter 1, Article 12<br />

(3), and Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> Chapter 2, Article-7, there was neither an operative provision regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

education nor was it <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the central legislative list.<br />

The trend <strong>of</strong> delegat<strong>in</strong>g education to prov<strong>in</strong>ces saw a major shift <strong>in</strong> 1973, when education was<br />

formally <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> the concurrent list <strong>in</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Pakistan 1973. The subject <strong>of</strong><br />

education featured prom<strong>in</strong>ently <strong>in</strong> federal as well as concurrent list. In the federal lists three entries<br />

deal with education (Entries: 15, 16 & 17 19 ). Whereas the concurrent list <strong>in</strong>cluded curriculum,<br />

syllabus, plann<strong>in</strong>g, policy, centres <strong>of</strong> excellence, standards <strong>of</strong> education, and Islamic education<br />

(Entries: 38 & 39). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Article 37 (b)’ ‘The State shall remove illiteracy and provide free<br />

and compulsory secondary education with<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum possible period’. After the <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>of</strong><br />

Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the 18 th Amendment: Right to <strong>Education</strong>. ‘The State shall provide free and<br />

compulsory education to all children <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> five to sixteen years <strong>in</strong> such manner as may be<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by law’. Although Article 37 (b) exclusively dealt with removal <strong>of</strong> illiteracy and<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> free and compulsory secondary education but did not prescribe a time period rather the<br />

provision mentioned, ‘with<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum possible time’. With Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the Constitution,<br />

education has become an enforceable right. The caveat however, rema<strong>in</strong>s that the compulsory<br />

education to all children shall be provided, ‘as may be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by law’ and there is no law on<br />

the subject at the moment. The subord<strong>in</strong>ate legislation has to be enacted by the respective prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

legislatures. So far, none <strong>of</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Assembly <strong>in</strong> Pakistan has passed the requisite legislation.<br />

18<br />

19<br />

Pakistan (Provisional) Constitutional Order 1947<br />

Libraries, Museums and similar <strong>in</strong>stitutions controlled or f<strong>in</strong>anced by the federation, Institutes for pr<strong>of</strong>essional,<br />

technical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or promotion <strong>of</strong> special studies, affairs <strong>of</strong> Pakistani students study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> foreign country. Entries<br />

15, 16, and 17, Federal Legislative List, Fourth Schedule, Constitution <strong>of</strong> Pakistan 1973<br />

13


2.2: Exist<strong>in</strong>g Institutional Framework for <strong>Education</strong><br />

After the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> Constitution <strong>of</strong> 1973, education has rema<strong>in</strong>ed a jo<strong>in</strong>t function, federal as<br />

well as prov<strong>in</strong>cial. At federal level, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> formulated policies, plans as well as the<br />

national curriculum. The prov<strong>in</strong>ces were to develop their own plann<strong>in</strong>g and implementation<br />

schemes <strong>in</strong> accordance with the national education policies and plans. All the prov<strong>in</strong>ces had similar<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative structures; Departments <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> with secretaries as adm<strong>in</strong>istrative head <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization, supported by prov<strong>in</strong>cial directorates as well as divisional and district formations.<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> and Khyber Pukhtunkhwa have separate departments for School (Elementary & Secondary)<br />

and Higher <strong>Education</strong>, whereas <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>dh and Baluchistan, all the functions are performed by s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>. <strong>Education</strong> management and direction is ma<strong>in</strong>ly done at district level,<br />

under the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative supervision <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial directorates and prov<strong>in</strong>cial departments <strong>of</strong><br />

education.<br />

Formulation, evaluation, and approval <strong>of</strong> curriculum have been the mandate <strong>of</strong> Federal Bureau <strong>of</strong><br />

Curriculum (Curriculum W<strong>in</strong>g) established at the Federal M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> under the Federal<br />

Supervision <strong>of</strong> Curricula, Textbooks and Standards Act 1976. The Federal Bureau <strong>of</strong> Curriculum<br />

has been supported by the Curriculum Bureau s<strong>in</strong> every prov<strong>in</strong>ce. These bureaus provide the<br />

academic support to the Federal Bureau <strong>of</strong> Curriculum. The responsibility <strong>of</strong> textbook development<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the National Curriculum rests with the prov<strong>in</strong>cial and regional Textbook Boards. In the<br />

early 60’s, the use <strong>of</strong> multiple textbooks was a very common practice <strong>in</strong> Pakistan. Later on, this<br />

practice was stopped after the creation <strong>of</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Textbook Boards <strong>in</strong> the government sector to<br />

develop textbooks for both public and private schools. The textbooks developed by the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Textbook Boards prior to be<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ted and circulated require f<strong>in</strong>al approval from the Federal<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Curriculum (Curriculum W<strong>in</strong>g) under the Federal Supervision <strong>of</strong> Curricula, Textbooks<br />

and Standards Act 1976. The Curriculum W<strong>in</strong>g Committee and the National Textbook Review<br />

Committee was responsible for evaluation and approval <strong>of</strong> the textbooks. In 2007 a National<br />

Textbook and Learn<strong>in</strong>g Material <strong>Policy</strong> was formulated by a committee consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Chairmen <strong>of</strong><br />

all the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Textbook Boards, and Jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Education</strong>al Advisor Curriculum W<strong>in</strong>g, Federal<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>.<br />

The recent 18 th Constitutional Amendment <strong>in</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Pakistan is a<br />

landmark <strong>in</strong> the constitutional history <strong>of</strong> Pakistan. Insertion <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the Constitution has<br />

guaranteed the provision <strong>of</strong> free and compulsory education by the state to all children <strong>in</strong> the age<br />

cohort <strong>of</strong> 5 to 16 years, ‘The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children <strong>of</strong> the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> five to sixteen years <strong>in</strong> such manner as may be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by law’. The amendment and<br />

<strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A has the potential to accelerate the pace <strong>of</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> national and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational targets towards the achievements <strong>of</strong> MDGs s<strong>in</strong>ce right to free and compulsory<br />

education has been recognized. The implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A is l<strong>in</strong>ked with further<br />

legislation by the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governments and the Federal Government; <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> federal<br />

territories. Considerable period has passed after the passage <strong>of</strong> 18 th Constitutional Amendment by<br />

the Parliament but the subsequent legislation for implementation, has yet to be passed by the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces.<br />

The enforcement <strong>of</strong> the 18 th Constitutional Amendment will necessitate <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education<br />

budget to fulfill the constitutional obligations. The estimated budgetary allocations have been<br />

worked out at Section 2.7. New challenges <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> responsibility for report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

14


commitments on Millennium Development Goals and EFA Goals have yet to be addressed.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Pakistan is required to provide data on annual basis to International Organizations<br />

like <strong>UNESCO</strong>, Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Human Development Index and other International<br />

Organizations. After the abolition <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, there is a need for establishment <strong>of</strong> a<br />

separate entity charged with the responsibility <strong>of</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> data from the prov<strong>in</strong>ces. Academy<br />

for <strong>Education</strong>al Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Management (AEPM) and Federal Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics are already<br />

function<strong>in</strong>g at federal level and the task for tabulation <strong>of</strong> statistics to feed <strong>in</strong>ternational donor<br />

agencies. Donor coord<strong>in</strong>ation has already been assigned to M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Economic Affairs Division.<br />

National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> (NEP 2009) has already been formulated and no more formulation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Education</strong> Policies is required at the moment s<strong>in</strong>e all the prov<strong>in</strong>ces were on board dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the policy formulation process. However, prov<strong>in</strong>ces may prepare their own education policies as<br />

and when need arises keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the prov<strong>in</strong>cial contexts and requirements <strong>in</strong> view. There are<br />

issues <strong>of</strong> national curriculum for the sake <strong>of</strong> national coherence, equivalence <strong>of</strong> degree holders and<br />

synchronization with the global themes like human rights, health education and gender<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g. Such issues could be easily addressed by Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Inter M<strong>in</strong>isterial Committees<br />

with revolv<strong>in</strong>g Chairmanship with respective <strong>Education</strong> Secretaries as members <strong>of</strong> the Committee.<br />

The management structure for education is multi-layered and complex. It <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>in</strong>puts at federal,<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial and district levels. In 2001, the devolution <strong>of</strong> powers <strong>in</strong>duced a new tier <strong>of</strong> political<br />

decision mak<strong>in</strong>g as District Governments. Under the Devolution Plan, powers and functions <strong>of</strong><br />

educational plann<strong>in</strong>g, management and monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation were decentralized and devolved<br />

to districts. Each district was empowered to devise the education plans <strong>in</strong> the light <strong>of</strong> National and<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Plans and implement them through District <strong>Education</strong> Department. Districts were<br />

supposed to prepare detailed work plan <strong>in</strong> each area/sector <strong>of</strong> education clearly identify<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

strategies, activities, actions, implementation mechanisms specify<strong>in</strong>g execut<strong>in</strong>g agencies and<br />

schedule <strong>of</strong> the activities, options, alternatives, resources both human and f<strong>in</strong>ancial. Districts lack<br />

the capacity required to fully undertake all <strong>of</strong> the above mentioned tasks. After devolution, the<br />

overlapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> functions among different tiers <strong>of</strong> government i.e. Federal, Prov<strong>in</strong>cial and District<br />

Governments created problems for coherent and holistic plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

By now the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governments are <strong>in</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g a new Local Government<br />

System and enactments are <strong>in</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> legislation. It is premature to evaluate or say anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about the new modicum <strong>of</strong> Local Government System but the new system has to be responsive to<br />

the local needs ensur<strong>in</strong>g school based management and school based solutions at local level. At the<br />

moment, the devolution <strong>of</strong> power plan is <strong>in</strong> place but respective DCOs are adm<strong>in</strong>istrators<br />

perform<strong>in</strong>g the functions <strong>of</strong> District Nazims. Despite grim situation <strong>in</strong> education sector, there is a<br />

ray <strong>of</strong> hope that respective federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments will resolve with stoic determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

to achieve the MDGs and EFA goals and beyond, after the 18 th Constitutional Amendment.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has already unfolded its roadmap for 100% enrolment and retention <strong>of</strong><br />

children <strong>in</strong> schools and committed to achieve the goal <strong>of</strong> quality education. Institutional<br />

arrangements are be<strong>in</strong>g put <strong>in</strong> place to meet the challenges post 18 th Constitutional Amendment.<br />

2.3: Responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governments as a Consequence <strong>of</strong> 18 th Amendment<br />

The 18 th Constitutional Amendment has essentially brought forth a legal challenge with multiple<br />

jurisdictional and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative implications at federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial levels. The 18 th<br />

Constitutional Amendment is a volum<strong>in</strong>ous enactment, touch<strong>in</strong>g upon n<strong>in</strong>ety eight Articles and two<br />

schedules <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. Two schedules have been deleted, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Concurrent<br />

legislative list. Apart from other reconfigurations, with deletion <strong>of</strong> the Concurrent legislative list,<br />

the amendment has transferred forty seven subjects, to the legislative and executive doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

15


prov<strong>in</strong>ces. The major areas to have direct effect <strong>of</strong> 18 th Constitutional Amendment <strong>in</strong>clude: laws,<br />

rules, regulations, policies as well as the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative structures.<br />

<strong>Education</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> the key subjects whose major components have been devolved down to the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces and M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> has been abolished. In the backdrop <strong>of</strong> the education crisis<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g faced, it is important to exam<strong>in</strong>e how redef<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> roles <strong>of</strong> federation and the federat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

units is go<strong>in</strong>g to affect state efforts to meet the challenge. The challenge at prov<strong>in</strong>cial level is<br />

essentially <strong>of</strong> the quantum and capacity to take on the delegated roles, whereas at federal level the<br />

most important questions relate to the future prospects <strong>of</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangement,<br />

possible course <strong>of</strong> action for generat<strong>in</strong>g a national response to the educational challenge and<br />

creat<strong>in</strong>g a viable <strong>in</strong>stitutional mechanism for <strong>in</strong>ter-prov<strong>in</strong>cial coord<strong>in</strong>ation which can ensure<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum common standards.<br />

2.4: <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>, Curriculum and Common Standards<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the adoption <strong>of</strong> the 1973 Constitution, the development and coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> national policies,<br />

plans and programs <strong>in</strong> education, as well as the development <strong>of</strong> curricula has rema<strong>in</strong>ed the key<br />

mandate <strong>of</strong> the Federal M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>. The removal <strong>of</strong> the concurrent list under the 18 th<br />

Constitutional Amendment has devolved the key roles <strong>of</strong> educational policy, plann<strong>in</strong>g, curriculum<br />

and put them <strong>in</strong> the exclusive legislative jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces. The change has given rise to<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> questions and issues concern<strong>in</strong>g policy formulation, plann<strong>in</strong>g and curriculum, <strong>in</strong><br />

conjunction with issues <strong>of</strong> macro level. The major issue however rema<strong>in</strong> as to how nationally<br />

coherent policy alternatives will be articulated and the choices will be made without compromis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the prov<strong>in</strong>cial autonomy and <strong>in</strong>tegrity.<br />

It is important to note that issue <strong>of</strong> education policy and curriculum has technical as well as political<br />

dimensions. Most <strong>of</strong> the debate and criticism raised <strong>in</strong> different quarters is focused on the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

devolution <strong>of</strong> curriculum. Few <strong>of</strong> political parties have also raised objections on the devolution <strong>of</strong><br />

the subject to the prov<strong>in</strong>cial doma<strong>in</strong> whereas nationalist parties <strong>in</strong> smaller prov<strong>in</strong>ces have supported<br />

the devolution <strong>of</strong> curriculum. The prospective change on the one hand poses a daunt<strong>in</strong>g challenge<br />

for the prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments for formulation <strong>of</strong> policies, curriculums, and standards, and, on<br />

other, it presents the federal government with a serious question to ponder upon. It is a huge<br />

challenge for the Federal Government now to ensure common m<strong>in</strong>imum standards <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

constituent units without compromis<strong>in</strong>g the autonomy enshr<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the ambit <strong>of</strong> 18 th Constitutional<br />

Amendment. The emerg<strong>in</strong>g scenario calls for a serious discourse at multiple levels that needs to<br />

take <strong>in</strong>to account the impact <strong>of</strong> the prospective devolution <strong>of</strong> functions.<br />

2.5: <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> & Plann<strong>in</strong>g- Institutions & Processes:<br />

18 th Constitutional Amendment has devolved education policy and plann<strong>in</strong>g to the prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

governments. This has led to a serious debate on the very rationale <strong>of</strong> a national education policy.<br />

The key issue relates to the fate <strong>of</strong> National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2009 (NEP, 2009), a consensually<br />

adopted and decreed document. It is important to note that the subject <strong>of</strong> education has rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial legislative jurisdiction and executive authority till 1973, when it was <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the<br />

concurrent legislative list. In Pakistan, so far, there have been at least n<strong>in</strong>e documents that have had<br />

the status <strong>of</strong> a policy. Each policy was prepared with vary<strong>in</strong>g degree <strong>of</strong> consultation and<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> the federat<strong>in</strong>g units. The key education policy documents to date <strong>in</strong>clude the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• Report <strong>of</strong> the Pakistan National <strong>Education</strong>al Conference 1947<br />

• Report <strong>of</strong> the Second Pakistan <strong>Education</strong>al Conference 1951<br />

• Report <strong>of</strong> the National Commission on <strong>Education</strong> 1959<br />

16


• Proposals for New <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>1969<br />

• New <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 1970<br />

• <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 1972-78<br />

• National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 1979<br />

• National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 1992<br />

• National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 1998-2010<br />

• National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2009<br />

In the wake <strong>of</strong> the 18 th Constitutional Amendment, a number <strong>of</strong> questions have been raised which<br />

directly relate to the future status <strong>of</strong> NEP 2009. The devolution <strong>of</strong> policy is <strong>in</strong>terpreted by a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> commentators as lead<strong>in</strong>g towards discont<strong>in</strong>uation <strong>of</strong> NEP 2009. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, all the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces were follow<strong>in</strong>g the National <strong>Education</strong> Policies and the devolution <strong>of</strong> education as a<br />

subject, none <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces have thought <strong>of</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g their own Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> is also still adher<strong>in</strong>g to NEP 2009.<br />

Formulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Policies is not the major task but implementation is the challenge. All the<br />

<strong>Education</strong>al Policies formulated at federal level had the concurrence and contribution <strong>of</strong> all<br />

stakeholders and policies were promulgated after due consultative process. The fact rema<strong>in</strong>s that the<br />

stated objectives <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Education</strong> Policies could not be materialized due to variety <strong>of</strong> reasons<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> the later part <strong>of</strong> this document. The state <strong>of</strong> education now <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-school<br />

children, adult illiteracy and issues <strong>of</strong> access, equity, quality and governance have been addressed <strong>in</strong><br />

the policy framework but <strong>in</strong> actual practical theatrics, the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> National<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Policies have not been translated <strong>in</strong> to implementation matrix. Table 1 <strong>in</strong>dicates that most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the time <strong>in</strong> the past, prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments were look<strong>in</strong>g after education sector <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g policy,<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g and curriculum without any <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> the federal government.<br />

2.6: Curriculum & Standards - Institutions & Processes<br />

Curriculum provides a framework for the educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the subjects, learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

objectives and learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. The key value <strong>of</strong> a curriculum is to ensure cohesion and<br />

uniformity <strong>in</strong> the education system <strong>of</strong> a given area. The recent devolution <strong>of</strong> curriculum has not<br />

been done for the first time <strong>in</strong> Pakistan. <strong>Education</strong> as a subject, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g curriculum, rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

the prov<strong>in</strong>cial jurisdiction till the adoption <strong>of</strong> 1973 Constitution. Until the present amendment the<br />

preparation and provision <strong>of</strong> national curriculum and standards for all prov<strong>in</strong>ces were performed by<br />

the Federal Bureau <strong>of</strong> Curriculum, Curriculum W<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>. The formation <strong>of</strong><br />

Curriculum W<strong>in</strong>g at M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1976 was followed by the establishment <strong>of</strong> four<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Curriculum Bureaus to ensure prov<strong>in</strong>cial collaboration and evolve consensus <strong>in</strong> all<br />

activities fall<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the purview <strong>of</strong> the Federation. The Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Textbook Boards were also<br />

established subsequently. Under the auspices <strong>of</strong> defunct M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, National<br />

Curriculum was developed <strong>in</strong> 2006-7. National Textbook and Learn<strong>in</strong>g Material <strong>Policy</strong> was also<br />

formulated <strong>in</strong> 2007. The relocation <strong>of</strong> curriculum to concurrent list <strong>in</strong> 1973, a number <strong>of</strong> researchers<br />

believe, was an upshot <strong>of</strong> the East Pakistan debacle. In context <strong>of</strong> 18 th Constitutional Amendment, a<br />

major apprehension emanates from similar concerns that it might jeopardize the federation and the<br />

critics substantiate the argument with the debacle <strong>of</strong> East Pakistan.<br />

17


Table 1: <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>, Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Curriculum Pre & Post 18 th Amendment<br />

Subject GOI Act 1935<br />

(PPCO 1947)<br />

Pre-18 th Amendment<br />

1956<br />

Constitution<br />

1962<br />

Constitution<br />

1973<br />

Constitution<br />

Post 18 th<br />

Amendment<br />

Right to <strong>Education</strong><br />

Recognized but<br />

not Justifiable<br />

Recognized but<br />

not Justifiable<br />

Recognized but<br />

not Justifiable<br />

Recognized but<br />

not Justifiable<br />

Article 25-A,<br />

makes it a<br />

justifiable right<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> and<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Concurrent<br />

Legislative List<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Curriculum<br />

Standards <strong>in</strong> Higher<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

(Except two<br />

universities)<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Concurrent<br />

Legislative List<br />

Concurrent<br />

Legislative List<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislative List<br />

Federal<br />

Legislative List<br />

Part-II<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment -<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

Table above <strong>in</strong>dicates that most <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>in</strong> the past, prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments were look<strong>in</strong>g after<br />

education sector fully <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g policy, plann<strong>in</strong>g, curriculum without any <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> the federal<br />

government. It also supports the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments advocat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong><br />

devolution through 18 th Amendment.<br />

<strong>Education</strong> has always been acknowledged as a basic right <strong>of</strong> citizens <strong>of</strong> Pakistan <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

constitutions. Later, different policy documents also recognized the importance <strong>of</strong> universal<br />

education as a fundamental right. Nevertheless, it was not a legal right <strong>of</strong> the citizens as previous<br />

governments only accepted it as a basic right and did not provide for provision <strong>of</strong> free education to<br />

all. However, with passage <strong>of</strong> 18th Constitutional Amendment, free and compulsory education for<br />

the children <strong>of</strong> 5-16 years <strong>of</strong> age group has been accepted as statutory fundamental right by<br />

<strong>in</strong>sert<strong>in</strong>g Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the Constitution. But still, it leaves a scope for debate as it has been made<br />

conditional to the manner to be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by law. Therefore, <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Constitution provides an opportunity for achievement <strong>of</strong> EFA and MDGs while reflect<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

implementation prospects <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A. For this purpose, the state needs to delve deep and come<br />

up with a workable plan on the basis <strong>of</strong> serious reflections on the f<strong>in</strong>ancial, legal, and technical<br />

implications <strong>of</strong> the commitment meted out through Article 25-A.<br />

2.7: F<strong>in</strong>ancial Implications for Implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g sections focus on calculat<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources required to implement the newly<br />

<strong>in</strong>serted Article 25-A.<br />

2.8: <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Budget<br />

In order to generate estimates <strong>of</strong> the budget required to achieve target set <strong>in</strong> Article 25-A, it is<br />

essential to understand the current pattern <strong>of</strong> budgetary allocations and spend<strong>in</strong>g on education at<br />

district and prov<strong>in</strong>cial levels. Table 2 below <strong>in</strong>dicates the current budget <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> for development programmes for 2010-11 and 2011-12.<br />

18


Table 2: <strong>Education</strong> Development Programmes 2010-11 & 2011-12 (Rs <strong>in</strong> Millions)<br />

19<br />

Sector<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Allocation<br />

2010-11<br />

Revised<br />

Allocation<br />

2010-11<br />

Allocation<br />

2011-12<br />

% Change<br />

Over 2010-11<br />

(Rev)<br />

<strong>Education</strong> 23300 13828 23900 72.84<br />

School <strong>Education</strong> 14050 9101 14500 59.32<br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong> 6350 4040 6500 60.89<br />

Special <strong>Education</strong> 500 42 500 1090.48<br />

Literacy 800 340 800 135.29<br />

TOTAL 45,000 27351 46200<br />

Danish School System 3000 3000 3000 -<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Endowment<br />

Fund (PEEF) 2000 2000 2000 -<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation<br />

(PEF) 4500 4500 6000 33.33<br />

DLIs for MDGs 6500 6500 8500 30.77<br />

TOTAL 16000 16000 19500<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, F<strong>in</strong>ance Department Budget 2011-12<br />

The share <strong>of</strong> current and development budgets <strong>in</strong> the overall education budget <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has been<br />

fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g significantly, which underscores the need for steady <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> allocations under<br />

different budgetary l<strong>in</strong>es to achieve the targets set <strong>in</strong> Article 25-A. At district level dur<strong>in</strong>g FY 2009-<br />

10, Rs.88, 440.42 million were allocated for education, which <strong>in</strong>cluded Rs.79, 320.19 million<br />

current budget and Rs.9, 120.05 million development budgets. However, <strong>in</strong> the current FY 2010-11,<br />

the education budget <strong>of</strong> districts has decreased by 20% over the last year’s budget, whereas<br />

development budget was reduced by 62%, primarily due to unprecedented floods <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

and reallocation <strong>of</strong> resources to meet the extreme emergencies caused by natural catastrophe.<br />

2.9: F<strong>in</strong>ancial Resources Estimation for Article 25-A<br />

While estimat<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources, the follow<strong>in</strong>g questions and their respective service ratios as<br />

practiced <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> have been used:<br />

• What would be the unit cost per student per year after <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> out <strong>of</strong> school children <strong>in</strong> the<br />

education system<br />

• How many teachers need to be recruited and what would it cost<br />

• How many teachers need to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed and what would it cost<br />

• How many non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff is required and what would it cost<br />

• How many schools and classrooms are required and what would it cost<br />

• What would it cost to provide miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities <strong>in</strong> all the schools<br />

2.10: Data Sets<br />

In order to calculate estimates for 25-A, three types <strong>of</strong> statistical data sets have been used, which<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• Programme Management and Implementation Unit (PMIU) Data 2011<br />

• <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011<br />

• Pakistan Social and Liv<strong>in</strong>g Standards Measurement Survey (PSLM 2007-08 & 2010-11)


The reason for us<strong>in</strong>g three different datasets stems from the fact that none <strong>of</strong> the available datasets<br />

provide statistics for all required <strong>in</strong>dicators. For example, the NER data has been taken from PSLM<br />

for the reason that NER cannot be calculated without conduct<strong>in</strong>g a household survey and PSLM is<br />

the only data source that conducts household survey.<br />

2.11: Methodology and Variables<br />

1) Estimated f<strong>in</strong>ancial requirement for compliance with 25-A has been calculated assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that all 5-16 years old children would be attend<strong>in</strong>g school and education would be available<br />

free to all children up to 10 th grade. For generation <strong>of</strong> estimates, year 2009-10 has been<br />

taken as base year and estimations have been projected for the next 15 years, i.e. till 2024-<br />

25. Therefore, current statistical data and budgetary <strong>in</strong>formation was collected and analyzed<br />

to grasp the current state <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the current situation,<br />

projections have been made for the next 15 years 20<br />

2) Gross Enrollment Rate (GER) for 2009 has been calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> data <strong>of</strong> PMIU.<br />

The projections have been made accord<strong>in</strong>gly on the basis <strong>of</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the class wise<br />

transition rates. The data for the Net Enrollment Rate (NER) has been taken from the PSLM<br />

report for the base year.<br />

3) Number <strong>of</strong> out <strong>of</strong> school children <strong>of</strong> 5-9 year age group for the base year has been calculated<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> NER data provided <strong>in</strong> the PSLM and for next 15 years it has been projected<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> enrollments and population figures.<br />

4) Establishment <strong>of</strong> new primary schools has been calculated to accommodate the additional<br />

enrolment, out-<strong>of</strong>-school children.<br />

5) Number <strong>of</strong> schools by level for the year 2009 is taken from the PMIU data and for the years<br />

to come, it has been calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> need and access. The average number <strong>of</strong><br />

students <strong>in</strong> one school for 2009 has been calculated from PMIU data, and projection has<br />

been made accord<strong>in</strong>gly. Up-gradation <strong>of</strong> the school from one level to the next is calculated<br />

to accommodate the stage-wise additional enrollment and <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the access to<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g education facilities.<br />

6) The ratio between Primary and Middle/ Elementary School is 6.3 Primary Schools feed <strong>in</strong>to<br />

1 (One) Middle School after work<strong>in</strong>g out the number <strong>of</strong> schools to be up-graded, its ratio<br />

will become 5.74:1 <strong>in</strong> 2014-15, 4.65:1 <strong>in</strong> 2019-20 and 4:1 <strong>in</strong> 2023-24.<br />

7) The ratio between Middle/ Elementary School and Secondary school is 1.56 Middle Schools<br />

for 1 (One) High School after work<strong>in</strong>g out the number <strong>of</strong> schools to be up-graded, its ratio<br />

will become 1.41:1 <strong>in</strong> 2014-15, and 1.29:1 <strong>in</strong> 2023-24.<br />

8) The ratio between Middle/ Elementary School and Secondary school was 1.56 Middle<br />

Schools have 1 (One) High School after work<strong>in</strong>g out the number <strong>of</strong> schools to be up-graded,<br />

its ratio will become 1.41: <strong>in</strong> 2014-15, and 1.29:1 <strong>in</strong> 2023-24<br />

9) As for the private sector is concerned, the contribution rate has been ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>of</strong> base<br />

year i.e., 40% and data <strong>in</strong> NEC 2006 has been consulted.<br />

10) Number <strong>of</strong> classrooms has been calculated from PMIU data. The required additional<br />

classrooms have been worked out to accommodate the prescribed policy <strong>of</strong> forty students<br />

20 The basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 15 years has been selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>puts from the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Education</strong> Departments.<br />

20


per classroom (40:1). The classrooms be<strong>in</strong>g added through establishment <strong>of</strong> new schools and<br />

up-gradation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g schools has been considered while estimat<strong>in</strong>g the requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

additional classrooms.<br />

11) The requirement <strong>of</strong> new teachers has been worked out from PMIU data. Student-teacher<br />

ratio at school level for 2009 has been calculated from the PMIU data and projected<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>gly as per policy. The demand <strong>of</strong> additional teachers is calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

improved Student-Teacher Ratio (STR) from 34:1 <strong>in</strong> 2009 to 33:1 <strong>in</strong> 2014-15, 32:1 <strong>in</strong> 2019-<br />

20 and 40:1 <strong>in</strong> 2024-25.<br />

12) For calculat<strong>in</strong>g the ratio for teach<strong>in</strong>g and non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff, the data has been taken form<br />

PMIU. The data for the non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff members are for those who are work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

schools. The data for the non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff work<strong>in</strong>g at district and prov<strong>in</strong>cial level was not<br />

available, therefore have not been factored <strong>in</strong>.<br />

13) The ratio for teach<strong>in</strong>g and non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff has been calculated as 4.5 teachers for 1 nonteach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

staff.<br />

14) The School Council, free textbooks, and stipend cost has been worked out from the budget<br />

books <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>, F<strong>in</strong>ance department, for the year 2010-2011. The required<br />

budget estimates for the years to come have been calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> constant unit<br />

cost.<br />

15) The <strong>in</strong>flation rate for 2009-10 was taken from the Economic Survey <strong>of</strong> Pakistan and this rate<br />

has been kept constant for projections.<br />

16) The benchmarks and assumptions have been established on the basis <strong>of</strong> service ratios <strong>of</strong><br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>. For example, service ratio <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> for<br />

student teacher ratio is 40:1.<br />

17) Cost<strong>in</strong>g has been done us<strong>in</strong>g government rates and unit costs. For example, for<br />

addition/construction <strong>of</strong> new schools, construction rate <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>,<br />

Communication and Works Department has been used. Therefore, any change <strong>in</strong> service<br />

ratio would affect the cost<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> projections. If we want to make system work more<br />

efficiently by chang<strong>in</strong>g the service ratio, then f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources need to be recalculated.<br />

Moreover, further improvement <strong>in</strong> the system to enhance quality <strong>of</strong> education or expand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the def<strong>in</strong>ition and scope <strong>of</strong> ‘free education’ would mean additional money, which would<br />

require recalculation <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial estimates.<br />

18) All employee-related expenses have been <strong>in</strong>creased by 6% annually on average. This<br />

average has been calculated <strong>in</strong> accordance with the exist<strong>in</strong>g government policy <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>crements on basic pay scales. For example, average salary <strong>of</strong> school teachers has been<br />

calculated from the district budgets. It has been projected for the next 15 years accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

number <strong>of</strong> teachers be<strong>in</strong>g added every year and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g their average annual salary by<br />

6%. Non-salary expenses for schools have been calculated on the constant rate <strong>in</strong> the years<br />

to come.<br />

19) Inefficiency cost has not been calculated. For example, currently teach<strong>in</strong>g and non-teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

staff ratio is 4.5:1. The cost <strong>of</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g this ratio to <strong>in</strong>ternational best practice <strong>of</strong> 10:1 has<br />

not been calculated, which can be done for mak<strong>in</strong>g the system work more efficiently. It is<br />

understood that by calculat<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>efficiency costs and ridd<strong>in</strong>g the system <strong>of</strong> these costs<br />

will improve efficiency <strong>of</strong> government and will help achieve the compliance with Article<br />

25-A <strong>in</strong> a more cost effective manner.<br />

21


2.12: F<strong>in</strong>ancial Projections 21<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g sections describe achievable targets with affordable costs aga<strong>in</strong>st a wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g population, enrolment, number <strong>of</strong> teachers, number <strong>of</strong> schools,<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure, basic facilities, unit cost per student, unit cost for pr<strong>of</strong>essional development,<br />

etc.<br />

Population<br />

Projections have been made on the basis <strong>of</strong> NIPS data, which <strong>in</strong>dicates an annual <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong><br />

more than 300,000 (approx.) populations between 5-16 years <strong>of</strong> age group.<br />

Figure 1: Population Projection: Children <strong>of</strong> 5-16 years Age Group<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

Enrollment<br />

Currently, enrollment rate <strong>of</strong> 5-16 years old children is 61%. The enrollment at Primary,<br />

Middle, Secondary and Higher Secondary level segments have been segregated <strong>in</strong> tables 35,<br />

40, 42 & 45. Projections are made to achieve the 98% enrollment <strong>of</strong> 5-16 years <strong>of</strong><br />

population by 2024-25. In this case, the projected budget for education elevates to an annual<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 15% to achieve the target <strong>in</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g 15 years.<br />

With 15% average annual <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education budget, <strong>Punjab</strong> can achieve 98% Net<br />

Enrollment Rate (5-16 years age group) till 2024-25.<br />

21 Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-Challenges &<br />

Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

22


Figure 2: Projected Increase <strong>in</strong> Enrollment based on GER<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

The costs <strong>of</strong> textbooks, school councils, and stipends would <strong>in</strong>crease due to provision <strong>of</strong> stipends<br />

and free textbooks to more students.<br />

Unit Cost per Student per Year<br />

It is assumed that ow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> salary cost and number <strong>of</strong> teachers, projection would elevate<br />

the unit cost per child per year to the level <strong>of</strong> Rs.16, 078.40 by 2024-25.The projected unit cost per<br />

student per year is shown <strong>in</strong> the Figure below:<br />

Figure 3: Projected Unit Cost per Student per Year<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

23


Classroom Construction<br />

To accommodate additional enrollment and out-<strong>of</strong>-school children, more classrooms and schools<br />

would be required. By tak<strong>in</strong>g 2009-10 as base year, projection <strong>in</strong>dicates that 263,184 additional<br />

classrooms and 5815 additional schools would be required by 2024-25 to adjust more students <strong>in</strong><br />

the classrooms. There is also a need to reduce classroom-students ratio to 1:40 <strong>in</strong> the next 15 years,<br />

which is currently 1:44.<br />

Table 3: Projected Increase <strong>in</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> Classrooms and Schools<br />

Increase <strong>in</strong><br />

Base Year<br />

(2009-10)<br />

Projection<br />

(2024-25)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Classrooms 236,288 499,472<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Schools 59,685 65,500<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

Unit cost is Rs.2.5 million for construct<strong>in</strong>g a build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> primary school, Rs.5.01 million for upgradation<br />

<strong>of</strong> primary to middle school, and Rs.5 million for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> middle to secondary<br />

school. (Source: <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Budget, 2010-2011).<br />

Basic Facilities<br />

The projection for basic facilities has been made on the assumption that <strong>in</strong>frastructure backlog and<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities will be taken care <strong>of</strong> approximately with<strong>in</strong> 2 years span. Projection has been<br />

worked out for provision <strong>of</strong> basic facilities <strong>in</strong> all those schools, which are without basic facilities,<br />

with an estimated cost <strong>of</strong> Rs.11.67 billion by year 2012-13. Once this backlog is taken care <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resources will be used for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g schools and <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> new schools <strong>in</strong> the<br />

system.<br />

Teacher Demand and Supply<br />

The projection shows a direct proportion between enrolment rate and teacher demand, as <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

enrollment <strong>of</strong> children would result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased demand for teachers. However, availability,<br />

recruitment, and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> such a huge human resource <strong>in</strong> itself are serious challenges for the<br />

government. Therefore, for compliance with 25-A <strong>in</strong> view <strong>of</strong> government service ratio, 144,865<br />

additional teachers would be required to br<strong>in</strong>g the student-teacher ratio at 40:1 <strong>in</strong> the next 15 years.<br />

Table 4: Projected Increase <strong>in</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> Teachers<br />

Increase <strong>in</strong><br />

Base Year<br />

(2009-10)<br />

Projection<br />

(2024-25)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Teachers 354,607 499,472<br />

Note: The data does not <strong>in</strong>clude pr<strong>in</strong>cipals and subject specialists (SS).<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

24


Figure 4: Annual Teacher Requirement at School Level<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

In-Service Teacher Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

In-service teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is essential for pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> teachers and for provision <strong>of</strong><br />

quality education to students. <strong>Punjab</strong> has <strong>in</strong>stitutionalized the <strong>in</strong>-service teacher-tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

programme. For this purpose, f<strong>in</strong>ances are be<strong>in</strong>g provided through current budget where major part<br />

<strong>of</strong> budget is utilized for salary <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>ers. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to projection, Rs.4832.7 per teacher would be<br />

required.<br />

Teach<strong>in</strong>g-Non-Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

The estimations have also encompassed the case <strong>of</strong> non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff, which is currently 4.5:1. It<br />

means that currently for every 4.5 teachers there is one person available from non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff.<br />

These ratios have been calculated for schools only, and do not <strong>in</strong>clude the staff work<strong>in</strong>g at district<br />

and prov<strong>in</strong>cial levels. Cautious estimates <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff at district and<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial level would take this ratio down further to 3:1. The same ratio has been ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

projection. However, cost<strong>in</strong>g can be done if Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> desires to improve situation by<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the teach<strong>in</strong>g-non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff ratio to 10:1. This ratio (10:1) is closer to <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

best practice and would result <strong>in</strong> cost sav<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

2.13: Budget Projections<br />

Estimates <strong>in</strong>dicate that on the whole allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.3387.046 billion, with an average <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong><br />

6-8%, will be required under district and prov<strong>in</strong>cial education budgets for achiev<strong>in</strong>g 98%<br />

enrollment rate by 2024-25. This shows that <strong>in</strong> 2024-25 there will be need to allocate at least an<br />

estimated amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.336, 039.70 million under district and prov<strong>in</strong>cial education budgets.<br />

25


Table 5: District and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Education</strong> Budget<br />

Base Year<br />

(2009-10)<br />

Projection<br />

(2024-25)<br />

Current Budget (Rs. Millions) 87037.80 306,305.26<br />

Development Budget (Rs. Millions) 25,822.61 29,734.45<br />

Total 112,860.41 336,039.70<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

With an average <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> 6-8% <strong>in</strong> the total education budget <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce it is estimated that<br />

on average Rs. 225.8 billion will be required each year for next 15 years.<br />

Figure 5: Increase <strong>in</strong> District and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Education</strong> Budget over the Last Year Budget<br />

(2009-<br />

24)<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18 th Constitutional Amendment-<br />

Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

In order to be compliant with the requirement <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A, the required f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources are<br />

estimated to be Rs.3387 billion for achiev<strong>in</strong>g 98% enrolment rate <strong>of</strong> 5-16 years <strong>of</strong> population by<br />

2024-25. It <strong>in</strong>cludes Rs.3023.78 billion current and Rs.363.26 billion development budgets. On<br />

average, a 15% annual <strong>in</strong>crease over the previous years <strong>in</strong> education budget is required for<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g the targets under 25-A. The achievement <strong>of</strong> targets is closely l<strong>in</strong>ked with the resource<br />

absorptive capacity. Various researches have proved that system lacks capacity to efficiently absorb<br />

even the available f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources. This capacity deficit needs to be bridged to effectively<br />

manage the additional resources and to seize the opportunities available after the 18 th Amendment.<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ces should make sector plans and come up with calculations to engage federal government<br />

and <strong>in</strong>ternational partners for additional targets to achieve the target set <strong>in</strong> Article 25-A.<br />

Inefficiency costs <strong>of</strong> system have not been calculated <strong>in</strong> the projections given <strong>in</strong> this section. If<br />

<strong>in</strong>efficiency cost is calculated and curtailed it will help get rid <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>in</strong>efficiency thus<br />

ensur<strong>in</strong>g compliance with Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> a more cost effective manner.<br />

26


Chapter-3: <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector: <strong>Policy</strong>, Current Status, Issues, Needs and Priorities<br />

3.1 Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong> -ECE<br />

3.1.1 <strong>Policy</strong>:<br />

There was no public policy, commitment and <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> ECE till late 1990s. It was for the first<br />

time that National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> (1998-2010) mentioned ECE and called for re<strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong><br />

Katchi/Pre-Primary Class as a formal class <strong>in</strong> Primary Schools, extend<strong>in</strong>g primary education to a<br />

six-year programme. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2009 (NEP 2009), ‘ECE has not<br />

been formally recognized by the public sector <strong>in</strong> Pakistan. There is no ECE <strong>Policy</strong> as such <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> is follow<strong>in</strong>g NEP-2009. However, the<br />

traditional ‘katchi’ class <strong>in</strong> some public sector schools has predom<strong>in</strong>antly rema<strong>in</strong>ed a<br />

familiarization stage towards formal school<strong>in</strong>g for un-admitted young students. A limited part <strong>of</strong><br />

the Grade-I National Curriculum is taught to this group. Aga<strong>in</strong>st this background, for the first time<br />

<strong>in</strong> Pakistan’s history, ECE was <strong>in</strong>cluded as a component <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector Reforms<br />

Programme (PESRP) and fund<strong>in</strong>g was provided to the prov<strong>in</strong>cial and district governments. ECE<br />

was also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the National Plan <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> for All. Pakistan is committed to the<br />

Dakar Frame work <strong>of</strong> Action and the first goal is to expand and improve comprehensive ECE for<br />

all children, especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged’. NEP 2009 identified three areas<br />

to improve provision <strong>of</strong> ECE across the country:<br />

(i) Wider participation;<br />

(ii) Better quality;<br />

(iii) Improved governance.<br />

A National Curriculum for ECE age group was developed <strong>in</strong> 2002 but was never implemented <strong>in</strong><br />

any prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> Pakistan <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Punjab</strong>. The efforts rema<strong>in</strong>ed conf<strong>in</strong>ed to traditional methods<br />

due to lack <strong>of</strong> proper mechanism to ensure dissem<strong>in</strong>ation, coord<strong>in</strong>ation, shar<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> ECE curriculum at national and prov<strong>in</strong>cial levels, lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong><br />

stakeholders, absence <strong>of</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g materials and absence <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>ed and qualified<br />

teachers. In the pre-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs at DSD, GCETs and UOE, ECE component is prom<strong>in</strong>ent and<br />

conspicuous by absence. As a result, the teachers are not aware about the learn<strong>in</strong>g requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

this age group. <strong>Punjab</strong> Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Commission has started test<strong>in</strong>g and assessment for Grade-5<br />

and 8 but there is no assessment system for this age group.<br />

NEP 2009 advised the follow<strong>in</strong>g policy actions:<br />

1. Improvements <strong>in</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> ECE shall be based on a concept <strong>of</strong> holistic development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

child that provides a stimulat<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>teractive environment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g play, rather than a<br />

focus on regimes that require rote learn<strong>in</strong>g and rigid achievement standards.<br />

2. ECE age group shall be recognized as compris<strong>in</strong>g 3 to 5 years. At least one year preprimary<br />

education shall be provided by the State and universal access to ECE shall be<br />

ensured with<strong>in</strong> the next ten years.<br />

3. Provision <strong>of</strong> ECE shall be attached to primary schools which shall be provided with<br />

additional budget, teachers and assistants for this purpose.<br />

4. For ECE teachers, a two-year specialized tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> deal<strong>in</strong>g with young children shall be a<br />

necessary requirement.<br />

5. This tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g shall be on the basis <strong>of</strong> ECE revised National Curriculum. The curriculum and<br />

support material for ECE shall take account <strong>of</strong> the cultural diversity <strong>of</strong> particular areas.<br />

Unfortunately the situation <strong>of</strong> ECE <strong>in</strong> rural area private schools is not satisfactory. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> a<br />

27


esearch study 22 reveal that ECE material (i.e. blocks, colors, pictures books, heads and buttons,<br />

charts etc.) is not provided <strong>in</strong> the classroom because purchas<strong>in</strong>g such materials for each classroom<br />

would not be economical for the owners <strong>of</strong> the schools s<strong>in</strong>ce village school fees are relatively low.<br />

The study further elaborates that teachers are not tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> activity based learn<strong>in</strong>g and are not well<br />

knowledgeable on the learn<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>of</strong> young children.<br />

Although there is no ECE <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> but policy makers are sangu<strong>in</strong>e and cognizant about the<br />

importance and impact <strong>of</strong> ECE. ECE prepares children for the primary and helps for 100%<br />

enrollment and retention. It lays the foundation for the development <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g, writ<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

number work. It encourages <strong>in</strong>teraction with the environment, participation <strong>in</strong>-group activities and<br />

enhances creativity and problems solv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> children. ECE is a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> moral, <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />

and social lessons for physical, mental, social, emotional and l<strong>in</strong>guistic growth and development <strong>of</strong><br />

early childhood age children. At the moment there is no <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangement for tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

the teachers to teach ECE students. ECE teachers have a pivotal role s<strong>in</strong>ce they are responsible to<br />

make the children ready for school<strong>in</strong>g and provid<strong>in</strong>g base for the complete development <strong>of</strong><br />

children. After the devolution <strong>of</strong> education to the prov<strong>in</strong>ces, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> is plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to formulate ECE <strong>Policy</strong> and start ECE classes after build<strong>in</strong>g adequate <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Primary Schools. The <strong>in</strong>itiative will be helpful for the implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap<br />

for 100% enrollment and retention.<br />

3.1.2: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

The renowned researchers <strong>in</strong> pediatrics, expert medical scientists, lead<strong>in</strong>g academicians, educational<br />

managers and development practitioners have almost a consensus and a complete unanimity <strong>of</strong><br />

views that early childhood education and development is extremely important. Early Childhood<br />

<strong>Education</strong> and Development at the same time is not only very crucial for the childcare but also<br />

critically significant for the personality development <strong>of</strong> the child. They all agree that propitious<br />

early childhood education and development is ‘The Foundation <strong>of</strong> Success’. The latest research has<br />

amply exhibited that the most important period <strong>of</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> development and growth for a child is<br />

between the age cohorts <strong>of</strong> 0-2 years. Medical research has adequately demonstrated that the<br />

experiences <strong>of</strong> early childhood have an endur<strong>in</strong>g and everlast<strong>in</strong>g effect on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s future<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g capacity and the tapestry <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g patterns. The precious earliest years<br />

<strong>of</strong> life lay the factual foundation for all that eventually follows. It is therefore, the most important<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial capacity <strong>of</strong> the children to learn and acquire the<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the surround<strong>in</strong>gs. This not only <strong>in</strong>cludes the temperaments, behaviors,<br />

risk averse and risk neutral attitudes but also the judgmental evaluation <strong>of</strong> positive and negative<br />

externalities <strong>in</strong> and around the early childhood, factually impact<strong>in</strong>g the attitud<strong>in</strong>al development <strong>in</strong><br />

the personality <strong>of</strong> the child. ECE is the only vehicle which successfully drives, dovetails, juxtaposes<br />

and permeates knowledge, ability, <strong>in</strong>quiry, awareness, consciousness, humility, development,<br />

prosperity, technology and what not. This is the ‘whole truth’ and time tested fact <strong>of</strong> the universe<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce times immemorial and also a verifiable truism for all times to come. Early childhood<br />

education is the foundation stone on which the whole superstructure <strong>of</strong> the grandeur and the<br />

amelioration <strong>of</strong> human race will ultimately h<strong>in</strong>ge upon. If the foundations are sound and solid, the<br />

superstructure will be ever endur<strong>in</strong>g. 23 .<br />

The major issue is that Government has not realized the importance <strong>of</strong> ECE and has therefore failed<br />

to make adequate <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements for the students. The <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> ECE classes <strong>in</strong><br />

22<br />

23<br />

ECE <strong>Policy</strong> Review: Policies, Pr<strong>of</strong>ile and Programs <strong>of</strong> Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong> (ECE) <strong>in</strong> Pakistan; <strong>UNESCO</strong><br />

and UNICEF; January 2008<br />

Malik, A.B (2004): The Foundations <strong>of</strong> Success: The Impact <strong>of</strong> Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong> and Development on<br />

the Personality <strong>of</strong> the Child<br />

28


some private schools and the concept <strong>of</strong> Katchi Class <strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the public schools are, far from the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> ECE and its impact on the personality <strong>of</strong> child <strong>in</strong> later years. The reasons for <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

ECE projects are numerous and also <strong>in</strong>terrelated. A child’s ability to th<strong>in</strong>k, form relationships and<br />

live up to his or her full potential is directly related to the synergistic effect <strong>of</strong> good health, good<br />

nutrition, and appropriate stimulation and <strong>in</strong>teraction with others. There is a dire need and <strong>in</strong>cessant<br />

demand for ECE classes by the parents. This will not only help the children to grow appropriately<br />

but will also be detrimental <strong>in</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> drop-out rates <strong>in</strong> early classes. The earlier the better,<br />

Government will have to <strong>in</strong>troduce ECE s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>tervention will be panacea for many ailments<br />

and anomalies <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g psycho-social development <strong>of</strong> child and sure retention and cont<strong>in</strong>uation <strong>in</strong><br />

education system. Government must prioritize ECE and make adequate <strong>in</strong>vestments at the earliest.<br />

In <strong>Punjab</strong> Islamic education especially recitation <strong>of</strong> Holy Quran is emphasized from early age. This<br />

education is imparted through three different modes i.e. formal, non-formal and <strong>in</strong>formal either <strong>in</strong><br />

mosques, Madrassas or at home. Even <strong>in</strong> remote areas the education to the recite the Holy Quran is<br />

considered compulsory by tradition and an effective way to <strong>in</strong>culcate moral values and teach life<br />

skills at an early age. It is estimated that more than 80% <strong>of</strong> the children <strong>in</strong> the age-group 4-10 years<br />

receive the education <strong>of</strong> Holy Quran.<br />

Pakistan is committed to the Dakar Framework <strong>of</strong> Action, adopted <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ternational conference on<br />

<strong>Education</strong> for All held <strong>in</strong> 2000 at Dakar. The first goal was to expand and improve comprehensive<br />

early childhood care and education for all children, especially for the most vulnerable and<br />

disadvantaged children. At national level National Plan <strong>of</strong> Action was formulated <strong>in</strong> 2001. <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Government also <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> ECE out <strong>of</strong> its own budget <strong>in</strong> its Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Plan <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>in</strong> 2003.<br />

The focus however, rema<strong>in</strong>ed on provid<strong>in</strong>g ECE by means <strong>of</strong> material resources. However, the most<br />

important role <strong>of</strong> ECE teachers had been neglected. For the first time Government has contributed<br />

attention to it <strong>in</strong> National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 1998-2010 and NEP-2009. The needs, target groups and<br />

strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2<br />

3.2: Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.2.1: <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, envisage the implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong><br />

Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, implemented <strong>in</strong> letter and spirit. The 18 th Constitutional Amendment<br />

and <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A has made it b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and compulsory on the state to provide free and<br />

compulsory education to children <strong>of</strong> the age group five to sixteen years. However, the manner and<br />

method <strong>of</strong> the provision is made cont<strong>in</strong>gent upon law, yet to be passed by Federal and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislatures. The Article 25-A reads as “The State shall provide free and compulsory education to<br />

all children <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> five to sixteen years <strong>in</strong> such a manner as may be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by law”<br />

Article 25-A, Constitution <strong>of</strong> Pakistan 1973.<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is resilient to achieve the Constitutional and Statutory obligations and<br />

political leadership has expressed firm commitment for the enforcement <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A. A<br />

comprehensive strategy is be<strong>in</strong>g formulated to achieve the goal and assume new roles and<br />

responsibilities after the 18 th Constitutional Amendment. The Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister’s School Roadmap is a<br />

step <strong>in</strong> this direction 24 . The education system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is diverse and rich at primary level. There<br />

are varied k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions, impart<strong>in</strong>g education to the masses. The educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

range from Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Government Public Schools, Federal Government Schools, Madrassas, Cadet<br />

Colleges, Missionary Schools, Garrison Institutes and Privately owned low cost and Elite Schools.<br />

24 Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister’s Secretariat: School Roadmap for 100% Enrolment and Retention<br />

(2011)<br />

29


The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> decided <strong>in</strong> 2010 to establish Danish Schools <strong>in</strong> selected areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce. It is claimed that the schools will br<strong>in</strong>g equity and the poorest <strong>of</strong> the poor will get a<br />

chance to access quality education at the state expense. Danish Schools are Elite schools for the<br />

poor, serv<strong>in</strong>g the most marg<strong>in</strong>alized sections <strong>of</strong> the society.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to NEP 2009, the low resources stand <strong>in</strong> sharp contrast to the commitment required by<br />

the policy statements which setup ambitious goals for the sector. The national emphasis on<br />

education goes back to the enshr<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the right to education <strong>in</strong> the Constitution. The contrast<br />

between the vision and the commitment has been po<strong>in</strong>ted out by the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission: “We<br />

cannot spend only 2.7% <strong>of</strong> our GDP on education and expect to become a vibrant knowledge<br />

economy 25 ”. The commitment gap could come from two reasons: (i) lack <strong>of</strong> belief <strong>in</strong> education’s<br />

true worth for socio-economic and human-centered development and or (ii) a lack <strong>of</strong> belief <strong>in</strong> the<br />

goals themselves. In regard to the first, the analysis done dur<strong>in</strong>g the policy review, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

review<strong>in</strong>g recent <strong>in</strong>ternational research and policy experience, confirms the potent role education<br />

can play <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g economic growth and social development. NEP 2009 further elaborates that<br />

the second reason is the lack <strong>of</strong> commitment to the policy goal itself. At the time <strong>of</strong> its birth as a<br />

nation, Pakistan <strong>in</strong>herited an approach to education that had two features. First, the education<br />

system <strong>of</strong> the time was designed to supply the skills needed to run the colonial adm<strong>in</strong>istration. The<br />

emphasis had been on education for the few, basically to fill public service jobs. The prevail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

objective was service to the adm<strong>in</strong>istration rather than service to the students and learners. This<br />

assessment is echoed by the Economist Intelligence Unit assessment <strong>in</strong> its latest review <strong>of</strong><br />

education, <strong>in</strong> which it observes that “Pakistan’s education system is among the most deficient and<br />

backward <strong>in</strong> Asia, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the traditional determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> feudal rul<strong>in</strong>g elite to preserve its<br />

hegemony”26. The economic structure <strong>of</strong> Pakistan at its <strong>in</strong>ception was almost entirely agrarian,<br />

with little manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and a small services sector. The skill needs <strong>of</strong> the economy did not<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence the structure <strong>of</strong> educational provision. The tradition <strong>of</strong> British education, which Pakistan<br />

<strong>in</strong>herited, emphasized academic skills to serve the adm<strong>in</strong>istration rather than skills and competence<br />

for use <strong>in</strong> the production sector.<br />

The implementation gap is believed to be more pervasive and it affected many aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

governance and the allocation and use <strong>of</strong> resources. One piece <strong>of</strong> evidence relates to the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

developmental funds allocated to the sector that rema<strong>in</strong>s unspent. Estimates range from 20% to 30%<br />

<strong>of</strong> allocated funds rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g unutilized. The under ly<strong>in</strong>g causes may lie <strong>in</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> a plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

culture, plann<strong>in</strong>g capacity and weaknesses <strong>in</strong> the accountability mechanisms. NEP 2009 identified<br />

another type <strong>of</strong> implementation problem <strong>of</strong> rent-seek<strong>in</strong>g and corruption that is believed to pervade<br />

the system. Political <strong>in</strong>fluence and favoritism are believed to <strong>in</strong>terfere <strong>in</strong> the allocation <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

to the districts and schools, <strong>in</strong> recruitment, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and post<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> teachers and school<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrators that are not based on merit, <strong>in</strong> award<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> textbook contracts, and <strong>in</strong> the conduct <strong>of</strong><br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ations and assessments. The pervasive nature <strong>of</strong> corruption <strong>in</strong>dicates a deeper problem where<br />

the service to the students and learners is not at the forefront <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and behavior on the part <strong>of</strong><br />

some <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g the system.<br />

3.2.2: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

NEP 2009 emphasized that address<strong>in</strong>g deficiencies require a fundamental change <strong>in</strong> the th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that <strong>in</strong>forms education policy at all levels. The need for a paradigmatic shift is echoed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

‘Vision 2030’ report <strong>of</strong> the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, which calls for major adaptation sand<br />

25<br />

26<br />

Pakistan <strong>in</strong> the 21 st Century: Vision 2030, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, Government <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, 2007.<br />

Country Report: Pakistan, Economist Intelligence Unit, The Economist, November 2007.<br />

30


<strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> the education system. NEP 2009 recommended that the paradigmatic shift requires<br />

that the objectives <strong>of</strong> the education policy would be to serve the <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> students and learners<br />

rather than <strong>of</strong> those who develop policy or implement programmes. This is a very fundamental<br />

shift as it implies changes <strong>in</strong> all the important parameters <strong>of</strong> education policy. PESRP, <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with<br />

its policy to <strong>in</strong>crease access to education decided to provide free textbooks to all students <strong>in</strong> public<br />

sector schools. In the f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 2005-06, the span <strong>of</strong> these books enhanced up to Metric level.<br />

The major objectives <strong>of</strong> PESRP are:<br />

• Enhance access, equity and quality <strong>of</strong> education<br />

• Improve education sector good governance and quality <strong>of</strong> education<br />

• Ensure appropriate budgetary allocations<br />

• Ensure better fiduciary environment<br />

• Institutional endeavor to enhance allocations for education<br />

• Improve sub-sector allocation on need basis and prioritize as and when need arises<br />

• Elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> gender disparity <strong>in</strong> primary and secondary education is card<strong>in</strong>al and<br />

cherished goal <strong>of</strong> PESRP and facilitation and access <strong>of</strong> girls to schools <strong>in</strong> rural areas is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the top priorities <strong>of</strong> the organization.<br />

The PESRP has three key pillars:<br />

• Public f<strong>in</strong>ance reforms to realign expenditures at the prov<strong>in</strong>cial and district level towards<br />

education.<br />

• Devolution and public sector management reforms.<br />

• <strong>Education</strong> sector reforms to improve quality, access and governance <strong>of</strong> the education<br />

system.<br />

Box-5 <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector Reform Programme<br />

PESRP has <strong>in</strong>troduced a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiatives to improve access to quality education <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

Governance<br />

• Major policy shift towards married based hir<strong>in</strong>g new teachers<br />

• Competitive textbook pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, publish<strong>in</strong>g and authorship<br />

• Strengthened monitor<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>formation systems and implementation mechanisms<br />

• Improved f<strong>in</strong>ancial management practices<br />

• Improvements <strong>in</strong> procurement practices<br />

• Capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> education managers<br />

Access<br />

• Provision <strong>of</strong> basic facilities to schools<br />

• School up-gradation to enhance access to higher levels<br />

• Public f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> private schools through the <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation (PEF)’s Foundation<br />

Assisted School and New Schools Program<br />

• Stipends to female students <strong>in</strong> low literacy districts to discourage drop outs<br />

Quality<br />

• Improved teacher pr<strong>of</strong>essional development through the Directorate <strong>of</strong> staff Development (DSD)<br />

• Independent <strong>in</strong>formation on student learn<strong>in</strong>g through the <strong>Punjab</strong> Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Commission (PEC)<br />

• Distribution <strong>of</strong> free text books to primary, middle and secondary schools<br />

• Performance bonuses to teachers<br />

• Learn<strong>in</strong>g assessments<br />

Community Participation<br />

• Capacity support to School Councils (SCs)<br />

• Regular transfers <strong>of</strong> funds to School Council accounts<br />

• Approval <strong>of</strong> School Council <strong>Policy</strong><br />

31


3.2.3: Vision <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department 27<br />

Enlightened and prosperous <strong>Punjab</strong> through improved governance, equitable access and quality<br />

School <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.2.4: <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

• Ensure achievement <strong>of</strong> education related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015<br />

and EFA targets.<br />

• Universal Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

• Completion <strong>of</strong> full Primary School<strong>in</strong>g by all children<br />

• Promote Gender Equality<br />

• Ensure 100% participation rate at primary level by 2011 and participation enhancement at<br />

the Elementary & Secondary level<br />

• Improv<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>of</strong> education<br />

• Promotion <strong>of</strong> Science & Computer education up to secondary level<br />

• Reduction <strong>in</strong> gender and regional disparities <strong>in</strong> access to education<br />

• Provision <strong>of</strong> quality education for deprived and marg<strong>in</strong>alized segments <strong>of</strong> society<br />

3.2.5: Sectoral Priority <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> is the <strong>in</strong>herent right <strong>of</strong> all children. For provid<strong>in</strong>g quality education, different<br />

<strong>in</strong>terventions like capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> teachers and managers; cont<strong>in</strong>ued assessment <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

achievements through exam<strong>in</strong>ations; provision <strong>of</strong> quality text books; I.T. labs, science labs and<br />

libraries have already been <strong>in</strong>troduced. Moreover, up-gradation <strong>of</strong> schools from Primary to<br />

Elementary level & from Elementary to High level and provision <strong>of</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities (Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Water, Sanitation, Boundary Walls, Electricity, Furniture & Toilet blocks) are also major <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

<strong>of</strong> our development portfolio:-<br />

Table 6: Sectoral Priority <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

Intervention<br />

Up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Schools (Primary to<br />

Middle and Middle to High level)<br />

Targets Achievements<br />

Targets<br />

2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13<br />

800 835 1000 1000 1000<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Teachers and Managers 122087 120000 150000 175000 200000<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Computers Labs <strong>in</strong> 515<br />

Elementary Schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

- - 515 - -<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities <strong>in</strong> Schools 1500 1597 1500 1500 1500<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Science Lab equipment <strong>in</strong><br />

1000 highly enrolled High/Higher<br />

Secondary Schools<br />

- - 1000 500 500<br />

Capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> School Councils 12973 8070 15204 15204 -<br />

Source: Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

27<br />

Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Annual Development Programme 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

32


3.2.6: Strategic Interventions <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

(i)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Daanish School System & Centers <strong>of</strong> Excellence Authority:<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> quality education is priority area <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Daanish School and<br />

Center <strong>of</strong> Excellence Authority has been established recently <strong>in</strong> 2010. Poorest <strong>of</strong> the poor will get<br />

education <strong>of</strong> International Standards <strong>in</strong> these <strong>in</strong>stitutions. The ma<strong>in</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> Daanish School<br />

System and Center <strong>of</strong> Excellence Authority are:-<br />

• To provide quality education to most deprived and marg<strong>in</strong>alized segments <strong>of</strong> the society<br />

• To comb<strong>in</strong>e the best features <strong>of</strong> traditional education <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> progressive Islamic<br />

and modern learn<strong>in</strong>g paradigm with prime focus on science subjects<br />

• To develop the student’s <strong>in</strong>tellect, character and physique, thereby enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to make<br />

purposeful contribution for the nation at the national level and to the community at the micro<br />

level<br />

• To cater for the overall development <strong>of</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alized students with emphasis on academics,<br />

sports and physical education mixed with social/cultural activities<br />

Fifteen Daanish Schools will be established and 72 exist<strong>in</strong>g schools will be converted <strong>in</strong>to Centers<br />

<strong>of</strong> Excellence <strong>in</strong> Phase-1. Major components <strong>of</strong> the scheme <strong>in</strong>clude (a) Provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructural<br />

facilities (b) Free board<strong>in</strong>g and lodg<strong>in</strong>g facilities (c) Establishment <strong>of</strong> science and I.T. Labs (d)<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> Libraries and (e) Provision <strong>of</strong> transport facilities (f) Construction <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong> the art<br />

build<strong>in</strong>gs for Daanish Schools.<br />

(ii)<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Computer/I.T. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Elementary Schools:<br />

In order to better equip the students with ICT education, 515 I.T. Labs are be<strong>in</strong>g established <strong>in</strong><br />

Elementary Schools <strong>in</strong> C.F.Y. 2010-11<br />

(iii)<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Science Labs <strong>in</strong> Secondary Schools<br />

To improve exist<strong>in</strong>g Science Labs <strong>in</strong> Secondary Schools and to strengthen Science Practical<br />

education, a development scheme has been proposed and <strong>in</strong> the first phase, about 1000 High/Higher<br />

Secondary Schools hav<strong>in</strong>g highest enrolment will be provided quality science equipment.<br />

Standardized practical books will also be developed under this scheme.<br />

(iv)<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum Service Delivery Standard for School <strong>Education</strong><br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g criteria have been developed by the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> while formulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Medium Term Development Framework (2010-11).<br />

Table 7: M<strong>in</strong>imum Service Delivery Standard for School <strong>Education</strong><br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum Requirements Urban Areas Rural Areas<br />

Population 1500 500<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Households - 25<br />

Distance from nearest primary school 01 KM 1.5KM<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> land 01 Kanal 02 Kanals<br />

Source: Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

33


Table 8: Criteria for Up-Gradation <strong>of</strong> Schools - From Primary to Middle Level<br />

Boys Schools Girls Schools<br />

Area 25 Marlas 20 Marlas<br />

Total Enrolment 100 Students 80 Students<br />

Total Enrolment <strong>in</strong> Class IV & V 20 Students 15 Students<br />

Source: Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Table 9: From Middle to High Level<br />

Boys Schools Girls Schools<br />

Area 60 Marlas 40 Marlas<br />

Total Enrolment 200 Students 150 Students<br />

Total Enrolment <strong>in</strong> Class VII & VIII 40 Students 30 Students<br />

Source: Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

(v)<br />

Up-Gradations<br />

With an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> students at Secondary level, policy makers <strong>in</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> thought it appropriate that exist<strong>in</strong>g Secondary Schools should be upgraded to Higher<br />

Secondary Schools. This will help the students to cont<strong>in</strong>ue their education beyond Grade-10<br />

especially for Girls s<strong>in</strong>ce distance to educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions substantially dropped the enrollment <strong>in</strong><br />

case <strong>of</strong> female students. The follow<strong>in</strong>g criteria was developed by School <strong>Education</strong> Department and<br />

approved by the Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

• Location at Tehsil Headquarters/Markaz headquarters to be determ<strong>in</strong>ed/decided by the<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Government on the identification/recommendation <strong>of</strong> District Government<br />

• No college/higher secondary school should exist <strong>in</strong> the radius <strong>of</strong> 10 km <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> girls and<br />

20 km <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> boys<br />

• M<strong>in</strong>imum land requirement is 16 Kanals. However, it could be less <strong>in</strong> urban areas with a<br />

vertical structure<br />

Table 10: Trends <strong>of</strong> Allocation<br />

(Rs. In millions)<br />

Year Orig<strong>in</strong>al Allocation Revised Allocation<br />

2005-06 2000.000 2020.344<br />

2006-07 3305.000 1151.529<br />

2007-08 8488.000 8305.514<br />

2008-09 16545.000 9661.025<br />

2009-10 13600.000 14.31.904<br />

2010-11 14050.000<br />

Source: Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Table 10 shows cont<strong>in</strong>uous enhancement <strong>in</strong> the budgetary allocations for the up gradation <strong>of</strong><br />

Secondary Schools to Higher Secondary Schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. While upgrad<strong>in</strong>g, the gender parity was<br />

particularly kept <strong>in</strong> view and the gender ratio <strong>in</strong> the upgraded schools has been 50:50.<br />

34


3.2.7: Current Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) is number <strong>of</strong> children attend<strong>in</strong>g primary school divided by the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> children with the specific age group who ought to be attend<strong>in</strong>g. The GERs are presented <strong>in</strong> two<br />

different ways: exclud<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the katchi class and for different age groups. One <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> strategies <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is to expand public provision <strong>of</strong> primary education and<br />

this measure can be used to assess whether government schools have <strong>in</strong>creased their coverage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population, by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g enrolments faster than the growth <strong>in</strong> population. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to PSLM<br />

2010-11, GER for primary schools (Age 5-9) dur<strong>in</strong>g 2010-11 <strong>in</strong>creased slightly from 91% <strong>in</strong> 2008-<br />

09 to 92 % <strong>in</strong> 2010-11. At prov<strong>in</strong>cial level trends are same with <strong>Punjab</strong> with at 98% as compared to<br />

97% <strong>in</strong> 2008-09. The GER (Age 10-12) for middle level has rema<strong>in</strong>ed constant at 54% and the NER<br />

has also rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable at 20% at national level. At prov<strong>in</strong>cial level more or less similar pattern is<br />

observed as for GER primary. GER at middle level <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is at 58 % as compared to 57% <strong>in</strong><br />

2008-09, which gives more realistic picture shows slight <strong>in</strong>crease at prov<strong>in</strong>cial level. The Matric<br />

Level (Age13-14) GER has <strong>in</strong>creased from 54% <strong>in</strong> 2008-09 to 57 <strong>in</strong> 2010-11. At prov<strong>in</strong>cial level<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> primary enrolment <strong>in</strong> past years has clearly been observed <strong>in</strong> PSLM 2010-11 and GER<br />

<strong>of</strong> matric level <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is at 61% as compared to 57 % <strong>in</strong> 2008-09. The literacy level <strong>of</strong><br />

population (10 years & above) has shown improvement. This has risen from 57% <strong>in</strong> 2008-09 to<br />

58% <strong>in</strong> 2010-11. Literacy rate <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is at 60% as compared to59 % <strong>in</strong> 2008-09.<br />

Tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate data for GER and NER at Primary, Middle and Adult Literacy rates.<br />

Table 11: Gross Enrollment Rate at Primary Level (Age 5 to9)<br />

Region/Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Estimate C.V<br />

Standard<br />

Error<br />

M<strong>in</strong>.<br />

95% Interval<br />

Max.<br />

Urban Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

106<br />

109<br />

0.82<br />

1.13<br />

0.87<br />

1.23<br />

104.43<br />

106.89<br />

107.83<br />

111.72<br />

Rural Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

86<br />

94<br />

0.82<br />

1.21<br />

0.71<br />

1.14<br />

84.97<br />

91.92<br />

87.76<br />

96.41<br />

Overall<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

92<br />

98<br />

0.63<br />

0.92<br />

0.57<br />

0.91<br />

90.65<br />

96.51<br />

92.90<br />

100.06<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

Table12: Net Enrollment Rate at Primary Level (Age 5 to 9)<br />

Region/Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Estimate C.V<br />

Standard<br />

Error<br />

M<strong>in</strong>.<br />

95% <strong>in</strong>terval<br />

Max.<br />

Urban Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

66<br />

69<br />

0.82<br />

1.04<br />

0.54<br />

0.72<br />

64.93<br />

67.80<br />

67.07<br />

70.63<br />

Rural Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

53<br />

58<br />

0.87<br />

1.24<br />

0.46<br />

0.71<br />

51.89<br />

56.16<br />

53.68<br />

58.95<br />

Overall<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

56<br />

61<br />

0.65<br />

0.92<br />

0.37<br />

0.56<br />

55.68<br />

59.63<br />

57.13<br />

61.83<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

35


PSLM 2010-11 has recorded estimation <strong>of</strong> GER at Primary level (age 5-9 years). NER <strong>in</strong> Urban<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is 66% whereas it is 53% <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> rural areas.<br />

Table 13: Gross Enrollment Rate at Middle Level (Age 10 to 12)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

C.V<br />

Standard<br />

95% Interval<br />

Error M<strong>in</strong>. Max.<br />

Urban Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

71<br />

73<br />

1.35<br />

1.82<br />

0.96<br />

1.34<br />

69.51<br />

70.85<br />

73.28<br />

76.10<br />

Rural Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

47<br />

52<br />

1.31<br />

1.80<br />

0.61<br />

0.93<br />

45.36<br />

50.01<br />

47.75<br />

53.67<br />

Overall<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

54<br />

58<br />

0.97<br />

1.33<br />

0.52<br />

0.78<br />

52.97<br />

56.66<br />

55.02<br />

59.70<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

Table 14: Net Enrollment Rate at Middle Level (Age 10 to 12)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Estimate C.V<br />

Standard<br />

95% Interval<br />

Error M<strong>in</strong>. Max.<br />

Urban Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

29<br />

31<br />

1.90<br />

2.42<br />

0.55<br />

0.75<br />

27.83<br />

29.63<br />

29.98<br />

32.58<br />

Rural Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

17<br />

19<br />

1.83<br />

2.43<br />

0.31<br />

0.46<br />

16.15<br />

18.18<br />

17.35<br />

20.00<br />

Overall<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

20<br />

23<br />

1.34<br />

1.77<br />

0.27<br />

0.40<br />

19.85<br />

21.83<br />

20.92<br />

23.40<br />

Tables above <strong>in</strong>dicate GER at Middle level (age 10-12 years) <strong>in</strong> Urban areas is estimated at 71%<br />

whereas it is 47% <strong>in</strong> Rural areas whereas NER for the same age group <strong>in</strong> Urban areas is 29% as<br />

compared to 17% <strong>in</strong> Rural areas. When compared to GER and NER at Primary level, there is a<br />

sharp decrease at Middle level which is a matter <strong>of</strong> great concern.<br />

Table 15: Literacy Rate-Population 10 Years & Older<br />

Urban Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Estimate C.V Standard<br />

Error<br />

74<br />

76<br />

0.50<br />

0.62<br />

0.37<br />

0.47<br />

M<strong>in</strong>.<br />

73.45<br />

74.75<br />

95% Interval<br />

Max.<br />

74.90<br />

76.59<br />

Rural Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

49<br />

53<br />

0.66<br />

0.88<br />

0.32<br />

0.46<br />

48.50<br />

51.95<br />

49.77<br />

53.77<br />

Overall<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

58<br />

60<br />

0.44<br />

0.58<br />

0.25<br />

0.35<br />

57.35<br />

59.67<br />

58.34<br />

61.05<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

36


Table 16: Adult Literacy (Population 15 Years & Older)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Estimate C.V Standard<br />

95% Interval<br />

Error M<strong>in</strong>. Max.<br />

Urban Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

72<br />

74<br />

0.55<br />

0.68<br />

0.39<br />

0.50<br />

71.51<br />

72.63<br />

73.06<br />

74.60<br />

Rural Areas<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

45<br />

49<br />

0.72<br />

0.95<br />

0.33<br />

0.47<br />

44.36<br />

47.90<br />

45.64<br />

49.72<br />

Overall<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

55<br />

57<br />

0.47<br />

0.63<br />

0.26<br />

0.36<br />

54.23<br />

56.41<br />

55.24<br />

57.81<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

Tables above <strong>in</strong>dicate literacy rate for the population <strong>of</strong> 10 years and older and adult literacy<br />

population 15 years and older. In case <strong>of</strong> literacy rate for the population 10+, it is 74% <strong>in</strong> urban<br />

areas whereas it is 49% <strong>in</strong> rural areas, whereas the adult literacy rate for 15+ is 72% <strong>in</strong> urban areas<br />

and 45% <strong>in</strong> rural areas. There is a huge gap between Rural and Urban Areas both for the population<br />

10+ and 15+.<br />

Tables below show:<br />

• The population that have never attended the school<br />

• PSLM 2010-11 <strong>in</strong>dicates that the total population that has ever attended the school<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is 77% whereas it is 82% for male and 72% for female. In rural areas the<br />

total population that has ever attended the school is 72% whereas it is 67% for male<br />

and 44% for female. The overall population that has attended the school is 63%<br />

whereas it is 72% for male and 53% for female. However there are huge variations<br />

across 36 districts <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

• Percentage Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population that has Completed Primary Level or Higher<br />

• PSLM 2010-11 <strong>in</strong>dicates the percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> population that has ever<br />

completed primary level or higher. In case <strong>of</strong> urban areas it is 68% where as it is<br />

72% for male and 64% for females. In rural areas, it is 44% whereas it is 53% for<br />

male and 34% for female. The overall percentage <strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> population that<br />

has completed primary or higher is 52% whereas it 60% for male and 44% for<br />

female.<br />

• Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level(Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

• PSLM 2010-11 <strong>in</strong>dicates the enrollment rate at primary level (age 5-9 years)<br />

exclud<strong>in</strong>g katchi class. In case <strong>of</strong> urban areas it is 109% where as it is 111% for<br />

male and 108% for females. In rural areas, it is 94% whereas it is 100% for male<br />

and 88% for female. The overall enrollment rate at primary level (age 5-9)<br />

exclud<strong>in</strong>g katchi class is 97% whereas it 103% for male and 93% for female.<br />

• Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age6-10) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

• PSLM 2010-11 <strong>in</strong>dicates net enrollment at primary level (age 6-10 years) exclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

katchi class. In case <strong>of</strong> urban areas it is 79% where as it is 80% for male and 78%<br />

for females. In rural areas, it is 67% whereas it is 70% for male and 64% for female.<br />

The overall net enrollment at primary level (age 6-10) exclud<strong>in</strong>g katchi class is 70%<br />

whereas it is 73% for male and 68% for female.<br />

37


• Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age4-9) Includ<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

• PSLM 2010-11 <strong>in</strong>dicates that enrollment at primary level (age 4-9 years) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

katchi class. In case <strong>of</strong> urban areas it is 111% where as it is 113% for male and<br />

109% for females. In rural areas, it is 94% whereas it is 100% for male and 88% for<br />

female. The overall enrollment at primary level (age 4-9) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g katchi class is<br />

99% whereas it is 104% for male and 94% for female.<br />

• Gross Enrolment Rate for Government Primary Schools (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

• PSLM 2010-11 <strong>in</strong>dicates enrollment rate for Government Primary Schools (age 5-9<br />

years) exclud<strong>in</strong>g katchi class. In case <strong>of</strong> urban areas it is 46% where as it is 45% for<br />

male and 48% for females. In rural areas, it is 68% whereas it is 71% for male and<br />

64% for female. The overall enrollment at primary level (age 5-9) exclud<strong>in</strong>g katchi<br />

class is 62% whereas it is 64% for male and 59% for female.<br />

38


Table 17: Population That Has Ever Attended School<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 82 68 75 66 36 51 71 47 60<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 82 72 77 67 44 55 72 53 63<br />

Attock 84 65 74 78 48 63 79 52 65<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 89 79 84 87 65 76 88 72 80<br />

Jhelum 90 77 83 87 63 74 87 66 76<br />

Chakwal 91 80 85 90 65 77 90 67 78<br />

Sargodha 84 70 77 69 36 52 73 45 59<br />

Bhakkar 78 57 68 64 30 47 66 34 50<br />

Khushab 84 54 69 76 39 57 78 43 60<br />

Mianwali 86 57 71 76 43 59 79 46 62<br />

Faisalabad 82 75 79 68 51 59 74 62 68<br />

Jhang 76 60 68 66 32 49 69 39 54<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 87 73 80 77 60 69 79 63 71<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 73 60 67 57 18 38 62 30 47<br />

Gujranwala 84 77 81 78 67 72 81 72 77<br />

Gujrat 84 79 81 81 65 73 82 69 75<br />

Sialkot 89 83 86 79 68 73 82 72 77<br />

Hafizabad 76 61 68 65 44 55 69 49 59<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 88 76 82 71 53 62 74 57 65<br />

Narowal 86 75 80 80 65 71 81 66 73<br />

Lahore 83 77 80 73 58 65 82 74 78<br />

Kasur 75 59 67 67 46 57 69 49 59<br />

Sheikhupura 82 72 77 67 50 59 72 58 65<br />

Nankana Sahib 72 64 68 71 51 61 71 54 63<br />

Vehari 80 68 74 64 37 51 67 43 55<br />

Multan 80 68 74 61 37 49 69 49 59<br />

Khanewal 82 62 72 67 34 51 70 39 55<br />

Lodhran 70 49 60 59 32 46 60 35 48<br />

D.G.Khan 79 59 69 50 18 35 54 24 40<br />

Rajanpur 79 61 70 40 15 28 45 22 34<br />

Layyah 78 64 71 64 34 49 66 40 53<br />

Muzaffargarh 77 58 68 56 26 41 60 31 45<br />

Bahawalpur 78 64 71 52 29 41 61 40 50<br />

Bahawalnagar 77 62 69 61 39 50 64 44 54<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 77 63 70 54 28 41 59 36 48<br />

Sahiwal 81 69 75 68 46 57 70 50 60<br />

Pakpatten 78 69 74 58 27 43 61 35 48<br />

Okara 81 67 74 62 36 49 65 40 53<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

39


Table 18: Percentage Distribution <strong>of</strong> Population that has Completed Primary Level or Higher<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 72 61 67 52 28 40 59 39 49<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 72 64 68 53 34 44 60 44 52<br />

Attock 74 59 66 64 39 51 66 43 55<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 80 72 76 75 57 66 77 64 71<br />

Jhelum 79 71 75 74 53 63 75 57 66<br />

Chakwal 84 74 79 80 57 68 80 60 69<br />

Sargodha 75 64 69 56 28 42 61 38 49<br />

Bhakkar 67 48 58 50 20 35 53 24 38<br />

Khushab 70 45 58 63 29 46 65 34 49<br />

Mianwali 74 48 61 63 33 48 66 36 50<br />

Faisalabad 73 68 71 57 43 50 65 55 60<br />

Jhang 64 51 57 52 24 38 55 30 42<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 75 65 70 66 52 59 68 55 61<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 65 53 59 45 13 30 51 25 38<br />

Gujranwala 71 67 69 62 54 58 67 61 64<br />

Gujrat 75 69 72 68 55 61 70 58 64<br />

Sialkot 74 73 74 60 55 58 64 60 62<br />

Hafizabad 65 50 57 56 33 45 59 39 49<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 79 70 75 59 43 51 62 48 55<br />

Narowal 73 68 70 63 49 55 64 52 57<br />

Lahore 74 70 72 60 49 55 72 67 70<br />

Kasur 65 49 57 54 35 45 57 38 48<br />

Sheikhupura 71 65 68 53 39 46 60 49 54<br />

Nankana Sahib 60 55 58 57 42 50 58 44 51<br />

Vehari 70 59 64 51 27 39 54 33 44<br />

Multan 68 60 64 47 28 38 56 40 48<br />

Khanewal 69 54 61 53 25 39 56 31 43<br />

Lodhran 58 41 50 45 22 34 47 25 36<br />

D.G.Khan 70 52 61 35 9 23 40 15 28<br />

Rajanpur 68 53 61 25 7 17 31 14 23<br />

Layyah 66 54 60 49 23 37 52 29 41<br />

Muzaffargarh 64 50 57 41 17 29 45 22 34<br />

Bahawalpur 66 56 61 37 21 29 46 32 39<br />

Bahawalnagar 61 52 56 47 30 38 50 34 42<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 67 56 61 40 21 30 46 29 38<br />

Sahiwal 69 61 65 53 37 45 56 41 48<br />

Pakpatten 73 61 67 41 18 30 46 26 36<br />

Okara 68 58 63 47 25 36 50 30 40<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

40


Table 19: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANK 08-09<br />

Pakistan 109 103 106 96 75 86 100 83 92 91<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 111 108 109 100 88 94 103 93 98 97<br />

Attock 111 96 104 125 107 117 121 104 113 8 114<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 115 108 112 133 110 121 124 109 117 4 117<br />

Jhelum 103 131 116 132 119 126 125 122 123 2 130<br />

Chakwal 128 125 127 129 120 124 129 120 125 1 119<br />

Sargodha 110 108 109 107 94 100 108 97 102 20 109<br />

Bhakkar 129 106 116 98 81 90 102 85 94 26 101<br />

Khushab 129 114 121 114 98 105 118 102 110 15 111<br />

Mianwali 131 109 119 114 105 110 117 106 112 11 94<br />

Faisalabad 107 107 107 99 93 96 102 99 101 23 97<br />

Jhang 96 116 105 92 79 86 92 86 90 29 97<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 130 114 122 121 103 113 123 106 115 6 114<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 85 95 90 92 57 76 90 69 80 33<br />

Gujranwala 106 112 108 117 116 116 111 114 112 9 103<br />

Gujrat 108 120 114 120 111 115 116 114 115 5 118<br />

Sialkot 125 118 121 115 104 110 117 107 112 12 117<br />

Hafizabad 113 109 111 103 109 106 105 109 107 16 92<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 117 113 115 109 109 109 110 110 110 14 118<br />

Narowal 115 123 119 115 113 114 115 114 115 7 127<br />

Lahore 115 107 111 112 100 106 114 106 110 13 109<br />

Kasur 102 109 105 110 103 106 108 104 106 17 101<br />

Sheikhupura 103 101 102 108 105 107 106 104 105 18 108<br />

Nankana Sahib 113 113 113 110 89 99 111 93 102 21 90<br />

Vehari 108 114 110 97 78 88 99 84 91 28 92<br />

Multan 106 107 107 96 76 86 100 87 93 27 91<br />

Khanewal 125 115 120 110 85 98 112 90 101 22 94<br />

Lodhran 102 93 98 86 80 83 89 82 86 31 88<br />

D.G.Khan 120 105 113 86 66 77 89 69 80 32 78<br />

Rajanpur 104 114 109 72 65 69 75 69 72 35 63<br />

Layyah 120 128 123 110 90 100 111 95 103 19 111<br />

Muzaffargarh 138 133 136 80 62 72 85 68 77 34 69<br />

Bahawalpur 90 86 88 71 57 65 76 65 71 36 64<br />

Bahawalnagar 122 98 110 88 79 83 94 82 88 30 92<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 101 91 96 69 56 62 75 63 69 37 66<br />

Sahiwal 114 113 113 105 91 98 106 94 100 24 102<br />

Pakpatten 118 128 123 106 82 95 107 88 98 25 101<br />

Okara 116 110 113 120 104 112 119 105 112 10 109<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

41


Table 20: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 6-10) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 106 100 103 96 75 86 99 82 91<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 109 105 107 100 87 94 103 92 98<br />

Attock 130 95 113 125 115 121 126 110 119<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 120 105 112 129 118 124 124 112 118<br />

Jhelum 96 129 111 117 131 123 112 130 120<br />

Chakwal 118 119 119 117 115 116 117 116 117<br />

Sargodha 115 111 113 109 91 100 111 96 103<br />

Bhakkar 109 98 103 89 75 82 91 78 85<br />

Khushab 111 114 113 104 98 101 106 102 104<br />

Mianwali 128 103 114 113 99 107 115 100 108<br />

Faisalabad 104 108 106 102 88 95 103 96 100<br />

Jhang 96 109 102 96 78 87 96 84 90<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 120 108 114 119 104 112 119 105 112<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 87 96 92 95 60 79 93 71 82<br />

Gujranwala 103 103 103 114 109 112 108 106 107<br />

Gujrat 108 103 105 115 110 113 114 108 111<br />

Sialkot 112 106 109 127 111 119 123 110 116<br />

Hafizabad 103 113 108 101 107 104 102 108 105<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 123 111 117 107 110 108 109 110 109<br />

Narowal 113 140 125 113 116 114 113 119 116<br />

Lahore 110 104 108 119 96 107 112 103 108<br />

Kasur 96 110 102 103 100 102 102 102 102<br />

Sheikhupura 111 99 104 106 100 103 108 100 104<br />

Nankana Sahib 109 104 107 111 91 100 110 93 102<br />

Vehari 113 105 110 98 78 88 100 82 92<br />

Multan 117 108 112 93 76 85 100 87 94<br />

Khanewal 132 120 126 106 85 96 110 92 101<br />

Lodhran 109 103 107 84 75 80 88 78 83<br />

D.G.Khan 126 115 121 85 67 76 88 71 80<br />

Rajanpur 96 105 101 75 68 72 76 72 75<br />

Layyah 123 123 123 105 90 98 107 95 101<br />

Muzaffargarh 116 107 112 86 59 72 89 63 76<br />

Bahawalpur 92 85 89 75 56 66 80 64 73<br />

Bahawalnagar 111 98 105 88 84 86 92 86 89<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 101 94 98 71 57 64 77 65 71<br />

Sahiwal 111 120 115 107 94 101 108 97 103<br />

Pakpatten 111 121 116 104 81 93 105 86 96<br />

Okara 112 103 108 115 99 107 115 100 107<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

42


Table 21: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 4-9) Includ<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 109 103 106 94 74 85 98 82 91<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 113 109 111 100 88 94 104 94 99<br />

Attock 106 98 103 122 104 114 118 103 111<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 116 109 113 133 112 123 125 111 118<br />

Jhelum 104 126 114 124 118 121 119 120 119<br />

Chakwal 130 136 133 121 116 119 122 119 121<br />

Sargodha 116 116 116 109 93 101 111 99 105<br />

Bhakkar 110 100 104 94 78 87 96 81 89<br />

Khushab 128 115 122 118 105 111 121 107 114<br />

Mianwali 125 109 117 116 101 109 118 103 111<br />

Faisalabad 116 108 112 105 96 100 109 101 105<br />

Jhang 118 116 117 94 80 87 98 87 93<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 122 117 119 117 106 112 118 108 113<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 105 99 102 95 65 81 97 76 87<br />

Gujranwala 118 123 120 131 124 128 124 124 124<br />

Gujrat 110 114 112 128 117 122 123 116 119<br />

Sialkot 126 120 123 131 117 124 130 118 124<br />

Hafizabad 127 120 124 114 108 111 117 112 114<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 120 112 116 114 109 112 115 109 112<br />

Narowal 115 126 120 118 113 116 118 115 117<br />

Lahore 115 108 112 116 103 110 115 107 111<br />

Kasur 102 117 109 106 103 105 105 106 106<br />

Sheikhupura 108 105 106 113 109 111 111 108 109<br />

Nankana Sahib 113 107 111 116 93 104 115 96 105<br />

Vehari 109 109 109 92 78 85 95 83 89<br />

Multan 107 112 110 92 73 83 97 86 92<br />

Khanewal 121 114 117 105 83 94 108 89 98<br />

Lodhran 95 86 91 83 73 78 85 75 80<br />

D.G.Khan 106 98 102 76 59 68 79 62 71<br />

Rajanpur 96 98 97 68 62 65 70 65 68<br />

Layyah 120 114 117 98 86 93 101 90 96<br />

Muzaffargarh 130 108 120 75 58 67 80 62 72<br />

Bahawalpur 106 91 99 79 61 71 86 70 79<br />

Bahawalnagar 117 101 109 95 86 91 99 89 94<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 100 93 97 79 61 70 83 68 76<br />

Sahiwal 99 97 98 96 82 89 97 84 90<br />

Pakpatten 109 119 114 95 73 85 96 79 88<br />

Okara 110 108 109 106 97 101 106 98 102<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

43


Table 22: Gross Enrolment Rate for Government Primary Schools (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi<br />

Class<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 50 48 49 76 59 68 69 56 63<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 45 48 46 71 64 68 64 59 62<br />

Attock 54 59 56 89 81 85 80 76 78<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 51 45 48 72 63 67 61 55 58<br />

Jhelum 50 81 64 90 81 85 80 81 81<br />

Chakwal 48 47 48 85 86 86 79 81 80<br />

Sargodha 50 52 51 81 74 77 73 69 71<br />

Bhakkar 112 94 102 86 73 80 89 76 83<br />

Khushab 90 80 85 88 77 82 89 78 83<br />

Mianwali 79 68 73 96 96 96 93 90 92<br />

Faisalabad 42 42 42 68 65 67 57 55 56<br />

Jhang 44 53 48 68 52 61 63 53 58<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 60 72 67 79 78 78 76 77 76<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 42 55 49 73 54 64 65 54 60<br />

Gujranwala 24 27 25 53 57 55 38 42 40<br />

Gujrat 55 55 55 68 65 66 64 63 63<br />

Sialkot 33 38 35 55 54 55 51 51 51<br />

Hafizabad 53 53 53 88 97 92 79 84 82<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 49 75 61 82 82 82 78 81 80<br />

Narowal 29 47 37 67 71 69 63 68 65<br />

Lahore 38 40 39 59 50 55 42 42 42<br />

Kasur 42 52 47 69 71 70 63 67 65<br />

Sheikhupura 31 34 32 62 66 64 52 54 53<br />

Nankana Sahib 48 48 48 56 53 55 55 52 53<br />

Vehari 33 49 40 73 55 64 66 54 60<br />

Multan 41 47 44 66 51 59 58 49 54<br />

Khanewal 62 56 59 86 68 77 82 66 74<br />

Lodhran 54 46 50 71 52 62 68 51 60<br />

D.G.Khan 52 45 49 69 56 63 68 55 62<br />

Rajanpur 81 89 85 69 63 66 69 65 68<br />

Layyah 56 56 56 93 80 87 88 77 83<br />

Muzaffargarh 61 75 67 60 51 56 60 53 57<br />

Bahawalpur 54 45 50 58 48 54 57 47 53<br />

Bahawalnagar 62 39 50 72 66 69 70 61 66<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 55 48 51 51 42 47 52 44 48<br />

Sahiwal 65 81 72 85 72 78 82 73 78<br />

Pakpatten 51 60 56 91 67 79 86 66 77<br />

Okara 49 60 54 93 86 90 87 83 85<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

44


Table 23: Net Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

TOTAL<br />

DISTRICTS MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANK 08-09<br />

Pakistan 67 65 66 57 48 53 60 53 56 57<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 69 69 69 60 55 58 62 59 61 62<br />

Attock 69 75 72 77 71 74 75 72 74 5 76<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 74 73 73 79 77 78 76 75 76 4 74<br />

Jhelum 71 78 74 81 73 77 79 74 77 2 81<br />

Chakwal 84 68 77 83 81 82 83 80 81 1 82<br />

Sargodha 73 69 71 65 64 64 67 65 66 16 72<br />

Bhakkar 81 66 73 54 47 51 57 50 54 29 57<br />

Khushab 72 71 71 62 60 61 65 63 64 21 69<br />

Mianwali 80 71 76 68 64 67 70 65 68 11 56<br />

Faisalabad 66 67 66 62 59 60 63 62 63 22 62<br />

Jhang 58 69 63 58 51 55 58 54 56 27 63<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 77 71 74 75 64 70 75 66 71 7 72<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 57 61 59 52 42 48 54 48 51 31<br />

Gujranwala 68 67 68 65 69 67 67 68 67 14 67<br />

Gujrat 66 75 71 67 68 67 67 70 68 10 80<br />

Sialkot 75 72 74 62 69 65 64 70 67 15 75<br />

Hafizabad 68 69 69 65 69 67 66 69 67 13 59<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 73 68 71 66 71 68 67 71 69 9 71<br />

Narowal 74 79 76 73 70 72 73 71 72 6 79<br />

Lahore 69 67 68 68 61 65 69 66 68 12 71<br />

Kasur 68 63 66 63 59 61 64 60 62 24 62<br />

Sheikhupura 65 71 69 60 63 61 62 66 64 19 64<br />

Nankana Sahib 69 76 72 66 60 63 66 63 65 18 60<br />

Vehari 75 74 75 58 45 52 61 50 56 28 52<br />

Multan 67 70 68 59 49 54 62 56 59 26 57<br />

Khanewal 86 78 82 67 53 60 70 58 64 20 60<br />

Lodhran 74 61 68 50 42 46 54 45 50 33 55<br />

D.G.Khan 81 74 78 54 41 48 57 44 51 32 55<br />

Rajanpur 68 76 72 44 43 44 46 46 46 35 45<br />

Layyah 79 77 78 65 56 60 67 58 62 23 72<br />

Muzaffargarh 77 85 80 50 39 45 52 43 48 34 45<br />

Bahawalpur 54 54 54 38 31 35 42 38 40 37 41<br />

Bahawalnagar 72 68 70 52 47 49 55 51 53 30 51<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 67 65 66 40 37 38 45 42 43 36 43<br />

Sahiwal 78 62 70 67 62 64 68 62 65 17 64<br />

Pakpatten 83 77 80 62 57 59 64 59 62 25 64<br />

Okara 72 69 70 71 67 69 71 67 69 8 71<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

45


Table 24: Net Enrolment Rate at the Primary Level (Age 6-10) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

DISTRICTS MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 78 75 76 68 56 62 71 61 66<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 80 78 79 70 64 67 73 68 70<br />

Attock 88 71 80 87 78 83 87 76 82<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 85 81 83 87 87 87 86 84 85<br />

Jhelum 80 87 83 87 84 86 85 85 85<br />

Chakwal 91 83 88 91 90 91 91 89 90<br />

Sargodha 86 81 84 79 72 75 81 74 77<br />

Bhakkar 82 75 78 63 52 58 66 56 61<br />

Khushab 82 85 83 75 69 72 77 73 75<br />

Mianwali 88 77 82 83 74 79 84 74 79<br />

Faisalabad 78 77 78 75 66 70 77 70 73<br />

Jhang 71 76 73 70 57 64 70 61 66<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 82 87 85 83 73 79 83 77 80<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 67 71 69 64 50 57 65 57 61<br />

Gujranwala 79 78 79 81 81 81 80 80 80<br />

Gujrat 82 84 83 83 81 82 83 82 82<br />

Sialkot 80 80 80 79 83 81 79 82 81<br />

Hafizabad 81 77 79 75 81 78 77 80 78<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 88 87 87 82 84 83 83 84 83<br />

Narowal 82 90 86 85 84 84 84 84 84<br />

Lahore 81 77 79 81 74 77 81 76 79<br />

Kasur 75 72 74 70 68 69 71 69 70<br />

Sheikhupura 79 80 79 72 71 71 74 74 74<br />

Nankana Sahib 79 83 81 72 71 72 74 74 74<br />

Vehari 85 78 82 68 55 62 71 59 65<br />

Multan 78 82 80 66 54 60 70 63 66<br />

Khanewal 91 84 87 77 60 69 79 65 72<br />

Lodhran 79 74 77 57 56 57 60 59 59<br />

D.G.Khan 86 81 84 59 49 54 61 52 57<br />

Rajanpur 71 77 74 51 50 50 52 53 53<br />

Layyah 83 87 85 75 63 69 76 66 71<br />

Muzaffargarh 84 81 82 60 45 52 63 48 55<br />

Bahawalpur 65 63 64 48 40 44 53 46 50<br />

Bahawalnagar 72 73 72 61 60 60 63 62 63<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 78 74 76 49 44 47 55 50 52<br />

Sahiwal 83 71 77 75 68 72 76 69 73<br />

Pakpatten 84 86 85 73 62 68 74 65 70<br />

Okara 78 83 80 76 73 74 76 74 75<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

46


Table 25: Net Enrolment Rate at Primary Level (Age 4-9) Includ<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 74 72 73 61 51 56 65 57 61<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 80 77 79 67 61 64 70 66 68<br />

Attock 71 79 75 82 75 79 79 76 78<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 83 82 82 89 83 86 86 82 84<br />

Jhelum 80 86 83 82 80 81 82 82 82<br />

Chakwal 90 88 90 83 85 84 84 86 85<br />

Sargodha 85 83 84 73 68 70 76 71 74<br />

Bhakkar 71 69 70 57 51 55 59 54 57<br />

Khushab 78 78 78 72 72 72 74 74 74<br />

Mianwali 83 78 81 77 67 72 78 69 74<br />

Faisalabad 81 76 78 73 68 71 76 71 74<br />

Jhang 83 75 79 66 58 62 69 61 65<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 79 80 79 78 73 76 78 74 76<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 78 71 74 61 53 57 65 59 62<br />

Gujranwala 86 85 85 87 84 86 86 85 86<br />

Gujrat 78 78 78 81 81 81 80 80 80<br />

Sialkot 87 85 86 86 86 86 86 86 86<br />

Hafizabad 87 89 88 83 74 79 84 79 81<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 84 79 81 79 78 78 79 78 79<br />

Narowal 84 91 87 83 80 82 84 81 82<br />

Lahore 79 75 77 80 72 76 79 74 77<br />

Kasur 75 76 75 68 67 68 70 69 69<br />

Sheikhupura 78 79 79 71 73 72 74 75 74<br />

Nankana Sahib 77 76 76 79 69 74 78 70 74<br />

Vehari 80 77 78 61 51 56 64 55 60<br />

Multan 76 81 78 63 51 57 67 61 64<br />

Khanewal 86 86 86 69 57 63 72 62 67<br />

Lodhran 74 60 68 52 42 47 55 45 50<br />

D.G.Khan 76 72 74 50 38 44 52 41 47<br />

Rajanpur 67 67 67 43 44 44 45 47 46<br />

Layyah 85 75 80 63 59 61 66 61 63<br />

Muzaffargarh 79 70 75 50 38 45 53 41 47<br />

Bahawalpur 74 66 70 51 41 46 57 48 53<br />

Bahawalnagar 76 79 78 66 60 63 68 64 66<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 74 71 73 54 45 50 58 50 54<br />

Sahiwal 74 61 68 64 57 61 65 58 62<br />

Pakpatten 81 75 78 60 52 56 63 55 59<br />

Okara 75 78 77 66 67 67 68 68 68<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

47


Table 26: Net Enrolment Rate <strong>in</strong> Government Primary Schools (Age 5-9) Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi<br />

Class<br />

48<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 28 28 28 44 37 41 40 34 37<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 26 27 26 41 39 40 37 36 36<br />

Attock 31 39 35 55 52 54 49 49 49<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 29 25 27 37 42 40 33 34 34<br />

Jhelum 34 45 39 58 48 53 52 47 50<br />

Chakwal 31 27 29 52 58 55 49 54 51<br />

Sargodha 30 28 29 47 51 49 43 46 44<br />

Bhakkar 67 54 60 46 42 44 49 44 46<br />

Khushab 48 47 47 47 48 47 47 48 47<br />

Mianwali 42 41 42 55 59 57 53 56 54<br />

Faisalabad 22 23 22 40 42 41 33 34 33<br />

Jhang 26 27 26 41 34 38 38 32 36<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 33 45 39 45 43 44 43 43 43<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 29 29 29 42 39 41 39 36 38<br />

Gujranwala 11 14 12 25 28 26 18 21 19<br />

Gujrat 32 34 33 34 38 36 34 37 35<br />

Sialkot 19 24 22 23 33 28 22 31 27<br />

Hafizabad 26 30 28 58 59 59 50 51 50<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 25 43 33 47 51 49 44 51 47<br />

Narowal 15 22 19 42 42 42 38 40 39<br />

Lahore 21 22 22 30 27 29 23 23 23<br />

Kasur 25 24 25 38 41 40 35 38 36<br />

Sheikhupura 17 20 18 32 36 34 27 30 28<br />

Nankana Sahib 30 31 30 30 33 32 30 33 31<br />

Vehari 21 25 23 45 30 38 41 29 35<br />

Multan 21 27 24 38 31 35 32 30 31<br />

Khanewal 33 32 32 52 42 47 49 40 44<br />

Lodhran 45 27 37 38 26 32 39 26 33<br />

D.G.Khan 36 27 32 45 34 40 44 34 39<br />

Rajanpur 51 61 56 42 42 42 43 44 43<br />

Layyah 34 25 29 55 49 52 52 46 49<br />

Muzaffargarh 28 44 35 38 32 35 37 33 35<br />

Bahawalpur 31 25 29 30 23 27 31 24 28<br />

Bahawalnagar 28 23 25 39 41 40 37 38 37<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 33 32 33 28 28 28 29 29 29<br />

Sahiwal 40 38 39 51 49 50 49 47 48<br />

Pakpatten 32 28 30 53 45 49 51 43 47<br />

Okara 34 36 35 53 55 54 51 53 52<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

Tables 17-26 above <strong>in</strong>dicate percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> population that has completed primary level<br />

or higher. The districts <strong>in</strong> Southern <strong>Punjab</strong> have much less completion rate as compared to districts<br />

<strong>of</strong> Central and Northern <strong>Punjab</strong>. Rajanpur, Layyah, Muzaffargarh, D.G.Khan, Lodhran and<br />

Bahawalnagar have much lower completion rate as compared to Lahore, Gujranwala, Sialkot <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Central <strong>Punjab</strong> and Chakwal, Jhelum, Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di and Attock <strong>in</strong> the Northern <strong>Punjab</strong>. The<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> primary level <strong>in</strong> urban area <strong>of</strong> Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di is 76% whereas it is 80%<br />

for male and 72% for female. In the same district the rural areas has percentage <strong>of</strong> completion <strong>of</strong><br />

primary level and higher at 66% whereas it is 75% for male and 57% for female. The difference <strong>in</strong><br />

percentage <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> female population is much higher <strong>in</strong> rural areas as compared to urban areas


<strong>of</strong> Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di district. When compared to Muzaffargarh <strong>in</strong> Southern <strong>Punjab</strong> the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

population complet<strong>in</strong>g primary level or higher <strong>in</strong> urban areas is 57% whereas it is 64% for male<br />

and 50% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas <strong>of</strong> the same district the percentage distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

population complet<strong>in</strong>g primary level or higher is 37% whereas it is 49% for male and 23% for<br />

female. The differential <strong>in</strong> Rural, Urban and male, female is much higher <strong>in</strong> Southern Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to PSLM 2010-11, the population <strong>of</strong> ten years and older that have ever attended schools<br />

is 60% <strong>in</strong> 2010-11 as compared to 59% <strong>in</strong> 2008-09. This proportion is much higher <strong>in</strong> urban areas<br />

than <strong>in</strong> rural areas and much higher <strong>in</strong> men than <strong>in</strong> women. <strong>Punjab</strong> and S<strong>in</strong>dh have the highest<br />

proportions that have ever attended school. Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has the highest proportion that<br />

has attended the school (85%) as compared to the bottom district Rajanpur (34%). Population<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g completed primary level has rema<strong>in</strong>ed unaltered 49% when compared with 2008-09.<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di with 76% <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has the highest completion rate with Rajanpur hav<strong>in</strong>g the lowest<br />

(23%).<br />

GER, sometimes referred to as the participation rate, is the number <strong>of</strong> children attend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

primary schools divided by the number <strong>of</strong> children who ought to be attend<strong>in</strong>g. GERs are presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> PSLM 2010-11 <strong>in</strong> two different ways exclud<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the katchi class and for different<br />

age groups.GER at primary level exclud<strong>in</strong>g katchi for the age group 5-9 years and for age 6-10<br />

years have been <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> the tables below. The GER at National level dur<strong>in</strong>g 2010-11 slightly<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased to 92 percent. In prov<strong>in</strong>ces, <strong>Punjab</strong> shows marg<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>crease from 97 percent <strong>in</strong> 2008-09<br />

to 98 percent <strong>in</strong> 2010-11. Chakwal <strong>in</strong>dicates 125% has the highest whereas it is 71% <strong>in</strong><br />

Bahawalpur. GER at National Level is 91 percent when katchi class is <strong>in</strong>cluded and the age group<br />

is expanded to Children 4-9 years old. The pattern with<strong>in</strong> districts <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces is more or less<br />

similar to GERs without <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g katchi class (PSLM 2010-11).<br />

PSLM 2010-11 collected <strong>in</strong>formation on enrolment <strong>in</strong> all types <strong>of</strong> schools <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the private<br />

and government sectors. PSLM 2010-11 shows GER <strong>in</strong> government primary schools. It is<br />

calculated as the number <strong>of</strong> children enrolled <strong>in</strong> government primary schools divided by the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> primary school age. In <strong>Punjab</strong> Mianwali has enrollment at 92% whereas<br />

Gujranwala at 40%. It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that apart from <strong>Islamabad</strong>, which has a rich facility <strong>of</strong><br />

Government schools and colleges, the general trend <strong>in</strong> all other big cities is the preferences <strong>of</strong><br />

private educational facilities over those provided by the government. Results reveal that the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> private schools leaves no alternatives and makes government schools a priority <strong>in</strong> small<br />

cities (PSLM 2010-11).NER at primary level refers to the number <strong>of</strong> students enrolled <strong>in</strong> primary<br />

schools <strong>of</strong> primary-school-age divided by the number <strong>of</strong> children <strong>in</strong> the age group for that level <strong>of</strong><br />

education. In other words, for Pakistan, the <strong>of</strong>ficial primary NER is the number <strong>of</strong> children aged 5<br />

to 9 years attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level divided by the number <strong>of</strong> children aged 5 to 9 years. NER for<br />

Pakistan as a whole <strong>in</strong> 2010-11 is 56 per cent as compared to 57 percent <strong>in</strong> 2008-09. Compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

NERs for districts <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>, it is revealed that Chakwal <strong>in</strong> the Northern <strong>Punjab</strong> is at is 81%<br />

whereas Bahawalpur <strong>in</strong> the Southern <strong>Punjab</strong> is at 40%.<br />

PSLM 2010-11 has also <strong>in</strong>dicated NER for government primary schools. NER is the number <strong>of</strong><br />

children aged 5-9 years enrolled <strong>in</strong> government primary schools divided by the total number <strong>of</strong><br />

children aged 5-9. Like GER for government schools, it measures the extent to which publicly<br />

49


provided education is reach<strong>in</strong>g its target group. However, this measure excludes overage children<br />

who are enrolled <strong>in</strong> primary schools. NER for Government primary schools with<strong>in</strong> districts follows<br />

a similar pattern as observed for NERs for the entire primary enrolment. The percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

primary school students who are enrolled <strong>in</strong> government schools has been shown <strong>in</strong> PSLM<br />

2010-11. The government share <strong>of</strong> primary enrolment is 68 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2010-11 as compared to 70<br />

percent <strong>in</strong> 2008-09. Rajanpur has a share <strong>of</strong> enrollment <strong>in</strong> Government Schools at 94% whereas <strong>in</strong><br />

Gujranwala it is at 36%. Urban areas especially big cities have higher number <strong>of</strong> private schools <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> therefore more enrolment than government schools. National <strong>Education</strong> Census 2006 (NEC<br />

2006) has <strong>in</strong>dicated the accelerated pace <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> private schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

After the publication <strong>of</strong> data by NEC-2006, the ever <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g share <strong>of</strong> Non-State Provision (NSP)<br />

<strong>in</strong> education sector has been highlighted for the first time. The public sector education system <strong>in</strong><br />

Pakistan used to be the major service provider until early 80,s. The private sector schools slowly<br />

and gradually started occupy<strong>in</strong>g the turf about two decades ago but galvanized their pace at a<br />

startl<strong>in</strong>g speed s<strong>in</strong>ce the turn <strong>of</strong> the century. The chief determ<strong>in</strong>ant for the sporadic growth has been<br />

due to severe shortage <strong>of</strong> schools, especially <strong>in</strong> rural areas, where 60% <strong>of</strong> the country’s population<br />

resides and state failure to provide socially acceptable quality education28. The table below<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates the total number <strong>of</strong> educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> public and private sector <strong>in</strong> Pakistan.<br />

Table 27: Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>al Institutions <strong>in</strong> Public and Private Sector<br />

(Figures <strong>in</strong> the parenthesis are percentages)<br />

Area Total Public Private<br />

Pakistan 245,682 164,579 (67.0) 81,103 (33.0)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 115,311 66,770 (57.9) 48,541 (42.1)<br />

S<strong>in</strong>dh 59,312 46,738 (78.8) 12,574 (21.2)<br />

NWFP 40,706 29,430 (72.3) 11,276 (27.7)<br />

Baluchistan 11,492 9,742 (84.8) 1,750 (15.2)<br />

ICT 1,348 598 (44.4) 750 (55.6)<br />

FATA 5,344 4,704 (88.0) 640 (12.0)<br />

FANA 4,366 1,505 (34.5) 2,861 (65.5)<br />

AJK 7,803 5,092 (65.3) 2,711 (34.7)<br />

Source: NEC 2006<br />

Keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the <strong>in</strong>adequacies <strong>in</strong> government educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions, even less affluent<br />

households are vot<strong>in</strong>g with their feet and opt<strong>in</strong>g for private schools, despite their <strong>of</strong>ten m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />

facilities, have come to be identified with a measure <strong>of</strong> quality education. A 1996 survey <strong>in</strong> five<br />

districts <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> showed that nearly 50% households with monthly earn<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> less than US$ 70<br />

were send<strong>in</strong>g their children to private schools, 87% <strong>of</strong> which were charg<strong>in</strong>g a school fee <strong>of</strong> less<br />

than US$ 2 per month. The private sector is tak<strong>in</strong>g on a more prom<strong>in</strong>ent role, not only <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

urban centers but also <strong>in</strong> rural areas <strong>of</strong> the relatively affluent districts. Out <strong>of</strong> 245,682 educational<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions covered by the educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions survey covered <strong>in</strong> 2006, by the Federal Bureau<br />

<strong>of</strong> Statistics, 33% were to be found <strong>in</strong> the private sector. In other words, the government is rapidly<br />

mov<strong>in</strong>g towards its goal <strong>of</strong> shift<strong>in</strong>g the load <strong>of</strong> education to private sector (Kardar, 2006) 29 . One<br />

reason for the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> public sector school enrolments may be attributable to the arguably better<br />

28 Malik, A.B (2007): Freedom <strong>of</strong> Choice, Affordable Quality <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Public Private Partnership<br />

29 Kardar Shahid (2006). Reflections on Pakistan’s Economy Heritage Publications Lahore, Pakistan<br />

50


quality <strong>of</strong> education provided by the private sector, as a consequence <strong>of</strong> which there may be a<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> students away from the public sector schools.<br />

Table 28: Gross Primary Level Enrolment Rate (Includ<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

PUNJAB:<br />

1st Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

2nd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

3rd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

4th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

5th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

GROSS PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT RATE - 2007-08 PSLM<br />

URBAN AREAS<br />

RURAL AREAS<br />

Male Female Both Male Female Both<br />

119<br />

96<br />

116<br />

144<br />

117<br />

119<br />

110<br />

95<br />

103<br />

112<br />

129<br />

109<br />

115<br />

95<br />

110<br />

128<br />

122<br />

114<br />

Source: PSLM 2007-08<br />

Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles are based on per capita consumption expenditure <strong>of</strong> 15,512 households. The 1st qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the lowest consumption level, whereas the 5th qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals with the highest consumption level. Gross enrolment rate i.e. number <strong>of</strong> children<br />

attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level i.e. class 0-5 divided by number <strong>of</strong> children aged 4 - 9 years multiplied by<br />

100.<br />

Table 29: Gross Primary Level Enrolment Rate (Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class)<br />

102<br />

80<br />

104<br />

109<br />

115<br />

131<br />

90<br />

65<br />

85<br />

105<br />

114<br />

116<br />

96<br />

72<br />

94<br />

107<br />

115<br />

123<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

GROSS PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT RATE - 2007-08 PSLM<br />

URBAN AREAS<br />

RURAL AREAS<br />

Male Female Both Male Female Both<br />

PUNJAB:<br />

1st Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

2nd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

3rd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

4th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

5th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

113<br />

82<br />

109<br />

138<br />

115<br />

117<br />

110<br />

91<br />

99<br />

107<br />

134<br />

110<br />

112<br />

86<br />

104<br />

123<br />

123<br />

114<br />

97<br />

75<br />

95<br />

102<br />

113<br />

131<br />

86<br />

59<br />

78<br />

103<br />

114<br />

112<br />

92<br />

67<br />

86<br />

102<br />

113<br />

121<br />

Source: PSLM 2007-08<br />

Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles are based on per capita consumption expenditure <strong>of</strong> 15,512 households. The 1st qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the lowest consumption level, whereas the 5th qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals with the highest consumption level. Gross enrolment rate i.e. number <strong>of</strong> children<br />

attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level i.e. class 1-5 divided by number <strong>of</strong> children aged 5-9 years multiplied by<br />

100.<br />

Table 30: Net Primary Level Enrolment Rate (Exclud<strong>in</strong>g Katchi Class)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

NET PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT RATE % - 2007-08 PSLM<br />

URBAN AREAS<br />

RURAL AREAS<br />

Male Female Both Male Female Both<br />

PUNJAB:<br />

1st Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

2nd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

3rd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

4th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

5th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

71<br />

46<br />

65<br />

72<br />

77<br />

82<br />

72<br />

53<br />

60<br />

69<br />

85<br />

83<br />

72<br />

49<br />

63<br />

71<br />

81<br />

83<br />

59<br />

45<br />

55<br />

62<br />

73<br />

81<br />

54<br />

35<br />

49<br />

64<br />

71<br />

75<br />

56<br />

40<br />

51<br />

63<br />

72<br />

78<br />

Source: PSLM 2007-08<br />

51


Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles are based on per capita consumption expenditure <strong>of</strong> 15,512 households. The 1st qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the lowest consumption level, whereas the 5th qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals with the highest consumption level. Net enrolment rate i.e. number <strong>of</strong> children aged 5-<br />

9 years attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level classes 1-5 divided by number <strong>of</strong> children aged 5–9 years<br />

multiplied by 100. Children attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level <strong>in</strong> a government school, expressed as a<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> all children attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level - enrolment <strong>in</strong> katchi is excluded. Children<br />

attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level <strong>in</strong> a government school, expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> all children<br />

attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level - enrolment <strong>in</strong> katchi is <strong>in</strong>cluded.<br />

Table 31: Enrolments <strong>in</strong> Government Schools as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> Total Enrolment at Primary<br />

Level<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

URBAN AREAS<br />

RURAL AREAS<br />

Male Female Both Male Female Both<br />

PUNJAB:<br />

1st Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

2nd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

3rd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

4th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

5th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

36<br />

64<br />

48<br />

38<br />

33<br />

19<br />

39<br />

73<br />

52<br />

41<br />

37<br />

16<br />

37<br />

68<br />

50<br />

39<br />

35<br />

18<br />

66<br />

86<br />

82<br />

59<br />

55<br />

27<br />

Source: PSLM 2007-08<br />

Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles are based on per capita consumption expenditure <strong>of</strong> 15,512 households. For details on<br />

how the qu<strong>in</strong>tiles were derived. The 1st qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the lowest consumption<br />

level, whereas the 5th qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the highest consumption level. Children<br />

attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level <strong>in</strong> a government school expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> all children attend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

primary level <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g katchi class) <strong>in</strong> the qu<strong>in</strong>tile <strong>in</strong>dicated.<br />

Table 32: Percentage <strong>of</strong> Population Ever Attended School by Income Class, Urban-Rural<br />

Residence and Gender<br />

67<br />

86<br />

78<br />

66<br />

58<br />

33<br />

66<br />

86<br />

80<br />

63<br />

56<br />

30<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

%AGE OF THE POPULATION 10 YEARS AND OLDER–2007-08 PSLM<br />

Urban Areas<br />

Rural Areas<br />

Male Female Both Male Female Both<br />

Panjab<br />

1stQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

2ndQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

3rdQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

4thQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

5thQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

80<br />

54<br />

66<br />

74<br />

82<br />

93<br />

69<br />

42<br />

54<br />

62<br />

70<br />

83<br />

74<br />

48<br />

60<br />

68<br />

76<br />

88<br />

68<br />

48<br />

59<br />

69<br />

76<br />

84<br />

43<br />

24<br />

32<br />

45<br />

53<br />

62<br />

55<br />

35<br />

45<br />

57<br />

64<br />

73<br />

Source: PSLMS 2007-08<br />

Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles are based on per capita consumption expenditure <strong>of</strong> 15,512 households. The 1st<br />

qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the lowest consumption level, whereas the 5th qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals with the highest consumption level. Attended school: All those <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have<br />

ever attended school were taken to have attended school.<br />

Population 10 years and older that has completed primary level or higher, has been expressed as a<br />

%age <strong>of</strong> the total population aged 10 years and older. Completed primary level: For the PSLM<br />

2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 all those <strong>in</strong>dividuals who report hav<strong>in</strong>g completed Class 5 or<br />

higher.<br />

52


Table 33: Primary Level Enrolments <strong>in</strong> Private Schools<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Panjab:<br />

1stQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

2ndQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

3rdQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

4thQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

5thQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

Urban Areas<br />

Rural Areas<br />

Male Female Both Male Female Both<br />

63<br />

34<br />

51<br />

61<br />

67<br />

80<br />

59<br />

26<br />

47<br />

58<br />

63<br />

80<br />

61<br />

30<br />

49<br />

60<br />

65<br />

80<br />

33<br />

12<br />

18<br />

36<br />

44<br />

72<br />

Source: PSLMS 2007-08<br />

31<br />

11<br />

21<br />

32<br />

41<br />

66<br />

32<br />

12<br />

19<br />

34<br />

43<br />

69<br />

Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles are based on per capita consumption expenditure <strong>of</strong> 15,512 households. The 1st qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the lowest consumption level, whereas the 5th qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals with the highest consumption level. Children attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level <strong>in</strong> a private<br />

school expressed as a %age <strong>of</strong> all children attend<strong>in</strong>g primary level <strong>in</strong> the qu<strong>in</strong>tile <strong>in</strong>dicated. Only<br />

private, for-pr<strong>of</strong>it schools are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this measure; children enrolled <strong>in</strong> NGO schools, Deeni<br />

Madrassa and other non-government schools are excluded from the numerator. Enrolment <strong>in</strong><br />

katchi class is <strong>in</strong>cluded.<br />

The data on the gaps suggests that there is substantial demand for education, but government<br />

schools are fail<strong>in</strong>g to provide an acceptable service. Hence parents turn to the private education<br />

sector. In accordance with the general perception, it is the better-<strong>of</strong>f households who are more<br />

able to send their children to private primary schools. The percentage <strong>of</strong> school children enrolled<br />

<strong>in</strong> government schools falls as <strong>in</strong>come arises <strong>in</strong> both urban and rural areas except <strong>in</strong> rural S<strong>in</strong>dh<br />

and rural Baluchistan where even <strong>in</strong> highest qu<strong>in</strong>tiles 92% and 73% <strong>of</strong> the total enrolment is still<br />

<strong>in</strong> government schools for both the sexes. However, <strong>in</strong> urban <strong>Punjab</strong> and S<strong>in</strong>dh, even a<br />

considerable proportion <strong>of</strong> the poor manages to educate their children outside the government<br />

sector.<br />

Table 34: Reasons for Never Go<strong>in</strong>g to School<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

PUNJAB:<br />

Parents didn’t allow<br />

Too expensive<br />

Too far<br />

<strong>Education</strong> not useful<br />

Had to help at work<br />

Had to help at home<br />

Child not will<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Other<br />

PERCENTAGE OF CASES WHERE REASON WAS CITED 2007-08 PSLM<br />

Boys<br />

Girls<br />

Urban Rural Overall Urban Rural Overall<br />

4<br />

36<br />

1<br />

2<br />

7<br />

3<br />

31<br />

16<br />

6<br />

23<br />

8<br />

1<br />

10<br />

4<br />

33<br />

15<br />

Source: PSLM 2007-08<br />

The population aged 10 years and older that has ever attended school expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

the total population aged 10 years and older <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. This <strong>in</strong>cludes all those <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have<br />

ever attended school, either currently attend<strong>in</strong>g or attended <strong>in</strong> the past. There is a wide variation <strong>in</strong><br />

the population that has attended school <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong> District Attock 74% attended<br />

<strong>in</strong> Urban areas whereas it is 84% for male and 65% for female. In the same district 63% attended<br />

school <strong>in</strong> rural areas whereas it is 78% for male and 48% for female. While analyz<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

population attended school <strong>in</strong> Hafizabad, 68% urban population attended the school whereas it is<br />

6<br />

26<br />

6<br />

1<br />

9<br />

4<br />

33<br />

15<br />

30<br />

43<br />

3<br />

2<br />

0<br />

4<br />

7<br />

12<br />

43<br />

22<br />

11<br />

1<br />

1<br />

4<br />

9<br />

9<br />

41<br />

25<br />

10<br />

1<br />

1<br />

4<br />

8<br />

10<br />

53


76% for male and 61% for female. In the same district 65% population <strong>in</strong> rural area attended the<br />

school whereas it is 65% for male and 44% for female. In Rajanpur 70% population attended the<br />

school whereas it is 79% for male and 61% for female. The situation gets much worse than urban<br />

areas because 28% <strong>of</strong> the population attended the school whereas it is 40% for males and 15% for<br />

female. There are however pockets with<strong>in</strong> districts hav<strong>in</strong>g much lower attendance <strong>in</strong> schools. In<br />

case <strong>of</strong> Rajanpur, the school attendance rate is much lower than the aggregate rural areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

district and even lower <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> female.<br />

Children aged 10 - 18 years that cited the reason <strong>in</strong>dicated for never attend<strong>in</strong>g school, expressed<br />

as a percentage <strong>of</strong> all children aged 10 -18 years that have never attended 2. Reasons for not<br />

attend<strong>in</strong>g school “Other” i <strong>in</strong>cludes ‘Poor teach<strong>in</strong>g/behavior’, ‘No female staff’, ‘No male staff’,<br />

‘Child sick/handicapped’, ‘ Child too young’ , ‘Lack <strong>of</strong> documents’, ‘Marriage', ‘Service’, and<br />

‘Other’.<br />

There are issues <strong>of</strong> access, equity, governance and quality <strong>in</strong> education. In the first <strong>in</strong>stance<br />

Government failed to provide access to school-go<strong>in</strong>g-age children <strong>in</strong> the age cohort <strong>of</strong> 5-9 years.<br />

One out <strong>of</strong> three school-go<strong>in</strong>g-age children is not go<strong>in</strong>g to school even today and 3.8 million<br />

children are out-<strong>of</strong>-school. The number <strong>of</strong> schools <strong>in</strong> public sector is not sufficient to<br />

accommodate all the school-go<strong>in</strong>g-age children. There is a huge demand for education and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> public schools is not sufficient to enroll the school go<strong>in</strong>g age children and the gap has<br />

been partially bridged by private sector. The alarm<strong>in</strong>g number <strong>of</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-school children <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />

that there are parents who cannot even afford to access low cost private schools. This also<br />

demonstrate that <strong>in</strong> remote rural areas30 and urban slums31, sill there are issues <strong>of</strong> access and<br />

specific pockets exists without public, private and non-formal schools. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Pakistan<br />

Integrated Household Survey (PIHS, 2001), the share <strong>of</strong> private sector <strong>in</strong> primary school<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

21%. National <strong>Education</strong> Census was held <strong>in</strong> 2006 and private sector jumped to 42%. All Pakistan<br />

Private School Association (APSA, 2011) claims that private sector has 66,000 schools at<br />

primary, elementary and secondary level <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> which is higher than the number <strong>of</strong> public<br />

schools be<strong>in</strong>g run under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>32.<br />

There are serious structural and capacity issues to accommodate the students graduat<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

primary level. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, the number <strong>of</strong> mosque schools<br />

is 4087 and that <strong>of</strong> primary schools is 43970. The number <strong>of</strong> Elementary Schools is however<br />

7534. It is not by default rather by design. Even if all the graduates at primary level <strong>in</strong>tend to jo<strong>in</strong><br />

Elementary Schools, there is no capacity. Similarly the number <strong>of</strong> Secondary Schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is<br />

4839. Aga<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutional strength is not adequate to accommodate Elementary Schools<br />

graduates. The case at Higher Secondary level is not different where the total number <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions is 518. The reasons for this structural anomaly are lack <strong>of</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department, low allocation <strong>of</strong> resources for <strong>Education</strong> Sector, sub-optimal utilization <strong>of</strong> available<br />

resources, use <strong>of</strong> resources allocated for education sector for other social sector programmes. In<br />

order to avoid utilization <strong>of</strong> funds earmarked for education especially literacy, Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> has recently decided to issue a notification mak<strong>in</strong>g the allocation for education sector nonfungible.<br />

By now, when education has been devolved to prov<strong>in</strong>ces and Article 25-A has been<br />

<strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong> the Constitution, there is hope that better allocations will be available for education<br />

sector.<br />

30 The first school was opened <strong>in</strong> the tribal areas <strong>of</strong> Rajanpur District <strong>in</strong> 2008 by PEF under an <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>of</strong> New School<br />

Programme after 61 years <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependence. In Tehsil Sadiqabad <strong>of</strong> R.Y.Khan District, a vast tract <strong>of</strong> an area spread<br />

over 25 kilometers, along river Indus, does not have any school even today.<br />

31 An urban slums sprawl<strong>in</strong>g on ma<strong>in</strong> Ferozpur Road <strong>in</strong> Lahore with a population <strong>of</strong> around one million does not have<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle public sector school. The first ever school opened <strong>in</strong> this locality was <strong>in</strong> 2006 by PEF under FAS programme.<br />

32 All Pakistan Private School Association June Bullet<strong>in</strong> 2011<br />

54


Dur<strong>in</strong>g the first year after devolution <strong>of</strong> education, <strong>Punjab</strong> has substantially <strong>in</strong>creased allocation<br />

<strong>of</strong> education sector especially Literacy and Non-Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Department from Rs 300<br />

million to Rs 1100 million. While look<strong>in</strong>g at the trends <strong>of</strong> allocation, <strong>in</strong> Table above, there is a<br />

substantial <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the budgetary allocation for education sector. In 2005-06 the budgetary<br />

allocation was Rs.2020-34 million, decrease to Rs.1151.52 million <strong>in</strong> 2006-07, aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease to<br />

Rs.8488.00 million to 2007-08, substantially <strong>in</strong>crease to Rs.16545.00 million <strong>in</strong> 2008-09 but<br />

decrease to Rs. 13600.00 million <strong>in</strong> 2009-10 and further enhance to Rs.14050.00 million <strong>in</strong> 2010-<br />

11. The present regime resolved to enhance the allocation and the determ<strong>in</strong>ation has been<br />

translated <strong>in</strong> to practice except dur<strong>in</strong>g 2009-10 when heavy floods <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce displaced 20<br />

million people and budgetary allocation were re-appropriated. On the other hand due to sudden<br />

enhancement <strong>in</strong> the salaries <strong>of</strong> the teachers, the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education budget has not helped much<br />

for open<strong>in</strong>g new schools and up gradation <strong>of</strong> primary schools to elementary level and elementary<br />

schools to secondary level, s<strong>in</strong>ce the pie <strong>of</strong> budget for development expenditure slightly improved.<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011 <strong>in</strong>dicate the data <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> schools, enrollment and<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> Mosque Schools, Primary Schools, Middle Schools and High Schools for the<br />

period 2000-01 to 2009-10. The data <strong>in</strong>dicates that total number <strong>of</strong> Mosque Schools <strong>in</strong> 2000-01 was<br />

8082 with an enrollment <strong>of</strong> 348,000 was reduced to 3342 <strong>in</strong> 2009-10 with decrease <strong>in</strong> enrollment<br />

212,000. Similarly teach<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> 2000-01 was 8852 reduced to 5039 <strong>in</strong> 2009-10. In case <strong>of</strong><br />

Primary Schools, 44068 schools were functional <strong>in</strong> 2000-01 with an enrollment <strong>of</strong> 41, 74,000<br />

students and 62,072 teach<strong>in</strong>g staff. The number <strong>of</strong> Primary Schools has been reduced to 43970 <strong>in</strong><br />

2009-10 with an enrollment <strong>of</strong> 47, 94,000, with the teach<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>of</strong> 55797. The good omen is that<br />

for the first time <strong>in</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the country, <strong>Punjab</strong> Government recruited 40,000 Educators<br />

absolutely on merit without any recommendation or favor. One is genu<strong>in</strong>e to be sangu<strong>in</strong>e to imag<strong>in</strong>e<br />

that service delivery by the Educators appo<strong>in</strong>ted on merit will impact the quality <strong>of</strong> education<br />

positively; sans they were saved from political <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> their post<strong>in</strong>g and transfer.<br />

This clearly <strong>in</strong>dicates that expansion <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> Primary Schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has not conformed<br />

with the population growth. The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> enrollment with less number <strong>of</strong> Primary Schools<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> to overcrowd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the classrooms. This also disturbed student teacher ratio and general<br />

positive externalities <strong>in</strong> the teach<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g environment <strong>of</strong> the schools. Moreover the substantial<br />

reeducation <strong>of</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g staff from 62072 <strong>in</strong> 2000-01 to 55797 <strong>in</strong> 2009-10 further exacerbated the<br />

enormity <strong>of</strong> the situation. The educational planners and policy makers rema<strong>in</strong>ed oblivious to the<br />

population growth and the required expansion <strong>in</strong> public education system both <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure as well as human resource.<br />

55


Table 35: Government Mosque and Primary Schools for Boys and Girls, Numbers,<br />

Enrollment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Schools Enrolment(‘000') Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Category/<br />

Year<br />

Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Male Female<br />

Mosque Schools<br />

2000-01 8082 7985 97 348 344 4 8852 8733 119<br />

2001-02 7863 7779 84 338 286 52 15452 15233 219<br />

2002-03 7742 7658 84 342 290 52 16518 16293 225<br />

2003-04 7400 7400 318 314 4 11996 11852 144<br />

2004-05 7474 7361 113 372 303 69 11728 11594 134<br />

2005-06 7289 7191 98 380 374 6 12060 11934 126<br />

2006-07 5754 5681 73 343 339 4 10116 10031 85<br />

2007-08 4926 4873 53 305 302 3 6381 6322 59<br />

2008-09 4087 4022 65 233 180 53 5063 4934 129<br />

2009-10 3342 3285 57 212 209 3 5039 4980 59<br />

Primary Schools<br />

2000-01 44068 21357 22711 4174 2419 1755 133183 71111 62072<br />

2001-02 44172 21240 22932 4152 2363 1789 129051 67255 61796<br />

2002-03 44253 21280 22973 4208 2394 1814 138084 71959 66125<br />

2003-04 44185 21454 22731 4291 2413 1878 129618 69420 60198<br />

2004-05 44176 21461 22715 4875 2670 2205 131975 70703 61272<br />

2005-06 44313 21512 22801 5121 2763 2358 133476 71374 62102<br />

2006-07 44687 21877 22810 5244 2844 2400 134993 72363 62630<br />

2007-08 44617 21941 22676 5199 2872 2327 125863 66959 58904<br />

2008-09 44970 22307 22663 5037 2728 2309 120500 61559 58941<br />

2009-10 43970 21912 22058 4794 2667 2127 120695 64898 55797<br />

Source:- <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Table above <strong>in</strong>dicates the drop-out rates for boys and girls from Class 1 to Class 6 and percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> cohort that left school before complet<strong>in</strong>g classes. There is tendency <strong>of</strong> school drop-outs and it is<br />

accentuated more <strong>in</strong> rural areas than urban areas. The situation has improved <strong>in</strong> 2007-08 as<br />

compared to 2005-06 but still serious and alarm<strong>in</strong>g. The drop-out rate <strong>in</strong> Class-1 <strong>in</strong> 2005-06 was<br />

0.4% as compared to 0.3% <strong>in</strong> 2007-08. The drop-out rate considerably soared <strong>in</strong> Class-3 where the<br />

boys leav<strong>in</strong>g school is 3.7% <strong>in</strong> 2005-06 and 2.4% <strong>in</strong> 2007-08. However, the figures are the most<br />

alarm<strong>in</strong>g for Class-4,5 & 6 when the drop-out percentage is 6.2%, 10% and 21.5% <strong>in</strong> 2005-06 as<br />

compared to 5%, 8.8% and 19.8% <strong>in</strong> 2007-08. In case <strong>of</strong> female students the situation is even<br />

worse. The drop-out rate for Classes-1,2,3,4,5 and 6 is 0.2%,0.9%, 3.3%, 6.9%, 11.0%, 29.0% <strong>in</strong><br />

2005-06 when compared to 0.3%, 1%, 3%, 5.8%, 8.8% and 24.9% <strong>in</strong> 2007-08. There is a slight<br />

improvement <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> reduction <strong>in</strong> the percentage <strong>in</strong> 2007-08 but still there is a wide deep chasm<br />

still to be bridged. The situation calls for an educational emergency, ensur<strong>in</strong>g not only 100%<br />

enrollment but retention as well to avoid such an alarm<strong>in</strong>g situation.<br />

56


Table 36:-Drop-Out Rates<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> Cohort that Left School Before Complet<strong>in</strong>g Class<br />

Gender and<br />

2005-06 PSLM 2007-08 PSLM<br />

Class<br />

Urban Rural Overall Urban Rural Overall<br />

BOYS:<br />

CLASS1<br />

CLASS2<br />

CLASS3<br />

CLASS4<br />

CLASS5<br />

CLASS6<br />

0.2<br />

0.8<br />

2.4<br />

4.3<br />

7.5<br />

17.4<br />

0.7<br />

1.3<br />

4.8<br />

7.7<br />

12.1<br />

25.0<br />

0.4<br />

1.1<br />

3.7<br />

6.2<br />

10.0<br />

21.5<br />

0.3<br />

0.5<br />

1.4<br />

4.1<br />

6.7<br />

16.5<br />

0.4<br />

1.0<br />

3.0<br />

5.6<br />

10.0<br />

21.7<br />

0.3<br />

0.8<br />

2.4<br />

5.0<br />

8.8<br />

19.8<br />

GIRLS:<br />

CLASS1<br />

CLASS2<br />

CLASS3<br />

CLASS4<br />

CLASS5<br />

CLASS6<br />

0.2<br />

0.7<br />

2.3<br />

4.8<br />

7.6<br />

17.9<br />

0.3<br />

1.2<br />

4.6<br />

9.5<br />

15.0<br />

42.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.9<br />

3.3<br />

6.9<br />

11.0<br />

29.0<br />

0.4<br />

0.5<br />

1.7<br />

3.7<br />

5.6<br />

15.6<br />

0.2<br />

1.3<br />

4.2<br />

7.5<br />

11.4<br />

32.7<br />

0.3<br />

1.0<br />

3.0<br />

5.8<br />

8.8<br />

24.9<br />

BOTHSEXES:<br />

CLASS1<br />

CLASS2<br />

CLASS3<br />

CLASS4<br />

CLASS5<br />

CLASS6<br />

0.2<br />

0.8<br />

2.4<br />

4.5<br />

7.5<br />

18.0<br />

0.5<br />

1.3<br />

4.7<br />

8.4<br />

13.2<br />

31.5<br />

0.3<br />

1.0<br />

3.6<br />

6.4<br />

10.3<br />

24.5<br />

0.3<br />

0.5<br />

1.5<br />

3.9<br />

6.1<br />

16.0<br />

0.3<br />

1.2<br />

3.5<br />

6.4<br />

10.6<br />

26.3<br />

0.3<br />

0.9<br />

2.7<br />

5.4<br />

8.8<br />

22.1<br />

57<br />

Source: - <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap has focused this particular aspect. The stated public policy on the subject<br />

is <strong>in</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> implementation. Those who are already out-<strong>of</strong>-school are be<strong>in</strong>g brought back <strong>in</strong><br />

to the ma<strong>in</strong>stream <strong>of</strong> formal school system through condensed modules by Literacy and Non-<br />

Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Department. Such a facility <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g is available only for the<br />

children <strong>in</strong> the age cohort <strong>of</strong> 5-15 years. Beyond 15 years <strong>of</strong> age, the only opportunity left is adult<br />

education. L&NFBED has opened adult literacy centers <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce to impart literacy and a<br />

lifelong vocational skill for male and female illiterates.<br />

3.2.8: Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities<br />

1.7% schools are shelter-less, 3.1% schools have dangerous build<strong>in</strong>gs, 18.8% schools are without<br />

boundary walls, 12% schools do not have water facility, 19.1% schools are without toilet blocks,<br />

and 38% schools are without electricity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Data presents serious challenges <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure at primary level <strong>of</strong> education where higher numbers <strong>of</strong> schools do not have boundary<br />

walls, build<strong>in</strong>g, electricity, toilet blocks, and dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water facility.<br />

Table 37: Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities 2010-2011<br />

Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities<br />

Mosque<br />

Schools<br />

Primary Schools<br />

Middle<br />

Schools<br />

Secondary<br />

Schools<br />

Without Boundary wall 1952 (58%) 8225 (19%) 560 (7%) 452 (9%)<br />

Without Build<strong>in</strong>g 490 (15%) 495 (1%) 5 (0.07%) 1 (0.02%)<br />

Dangerous Build<strong>in</strong>g 205 (6%) 1508 (3%) 74 (1%) 67 (1%)<br />

Electricity 2425 (73%) 19288 (44%) 879 (12%) 99 (2%)<br />

Toilet Block 1914 (57%) 8759 (20%) 410 (5%) 330 (7%)<br />

Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water 1223 (37% 5515 (13%) 291 (4%) 101 (2%)<br />

Source:- <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>


The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> had allocated Rs.2 billion for miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities <strong>in</strong> the educational<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions at Primary, Middle, Secondary & Higher Secondary level <strong>in</strong> the ADP 2009-10. The<br />

allocated amount however, could not be spent s<strong>in</strong>ce the re-appropriation was carried out keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

view the devastat<strong>in</strong>g floods dur<strong>in</strong>g 2010 and the amount was diverted for the relief operation <strong>of</strong> 20<br />

million flood affected population <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the current f<strong>in</strong>ancial year, an<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.2 billion has been allocated to bridge the miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities and Government has<br />

chalked out a roadmap with clear guidel<strong>in</strong>es to ensure that issue <strong>of</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities <strong>in</strong> all<br />

educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce is addressed dur<strong>in</strong>g the next 5 years.<br />

Box-6: Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities and Rationalization Process<br />

The coverage <strong>of</strong> public sector education <strong>in</strong>frastructure at primary level is a major issue <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. There are<br />

serious issues <strong>of</strong> access especially for girls and there is a dire need to open more schools <strong>in</strong> remote rural and less<br />

privileged urban areas. Contrary to the <strong>in</strong>cessant demand, School <strong>Education</strong> Department (SED), Government <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong> has closed 896 schools dur<strong>in</strong>g 2010-2011 33 . The stated rational beh<strong>in</strong>d the closure <strong>of</strong> the schools is the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> rationalization by SED. The public representatives and parliamentarians has publically criticized the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>of</strong> SED. The critics are <strong>of</strong> the view that <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g more schools for boys and girls to ensure<br />

access and check drop-out rates, SED is clos<strong>in</strong>g the schools. SED however, justifies that some <strong>of</strong> the close<br />

schools did not have sufficient enrollment. The critics however, rebut the argument stat<strong>in</strong>g that had SED been<br />

successful to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all the out-<strong>of</strong>-school children <strong>in</strong> to schools, the issue <strong>of</strong> enrollment would not have been<br />

there. It is highly controversial issue and oxymoronic as well. The issue has been raised <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Legislature and has been handed over to Special Committee headed by Leader <strong>of</strong> the Opposition for a report <strong>in</strong><br />

the Assembly. There are serious concerns about miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities and media reports on this account have<br />

highlighted the issue <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Tak<strong>in</strong>g cognizance <strong>of</strong> the situation, Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>Punjab</strong> has constituted a<br />

committee headed by Secretary L&NFBED to evaluate the quantum <strong>of</strong> the menace and monitor the pace <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation by SED and P&D.<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development <strong>of</strong> Teachers is absolutely essential for quality education <strong>in</strong><br />

the educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. There are two premier <strong>in</strong>stitutions i.e. Directorate <strong>of</strong><br />

Staff Development and University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, dedicated for pre-service and <strong>in</strong>-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

the teachers <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

Box-7: Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development <strong>of</strong> Teachers<br />

The Directorate <strong>of</strong> Staff Development 34 is render<strong>in</strong>g valuable / meritorious services <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> teachers’<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce last 50 years. The <strong>in</strong>stitution was established with the name <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Extension Centre (EEC)<br />

<strong>in</strong> the year 1959. S<strong>in</strong>ce its <strong>in</strong>ception it is contribut<strong>in</strong>g positively <strong>in</strong> the progression <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce by<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g as a change agent. The Government has facilitated teacher development by evolv<strong>in</strong>g a specific role for<br />

the Directorate as an organization solely responsible for coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g and ensur<strong>in</strong>g teacher development <strong>in</strong> the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The Directorate was l<strong>in</strong>ked with University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> (UOE) for couple <strong>of</strong> years. However, it was<br />

del<strong>in</strong>ked from the same <strong>in</strong> the year 2004 and restructured to become an apex organization for teachers’<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development. In the year 2006 <strong>Punjab</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Teacher <strong>Education</strong> (PITE) and Government<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Elementary Teachers (GCETs) were also given under the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative control <strong>of</strong> DSD. In the year<br />

2009 PITE was merged with DSD <strong>in</strong> order to strengthen the <strong>in</strong>stitution as one unit and for a coord<strong>in</strong>ated effort<br />

towards atta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> its goals. The vision <strong>of</strong> DSD is to develop a knowledgeable, committed, motivated,<br />

competent and ethically sound cadre <strong>of</strong> education personnel to ensure the delivery <strong>of</strong> top quality education to the<br />

students <strong>in</strong> government schools <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. To establish a system <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional development for teachers and<br />

education personnel for enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the quality <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the government schools <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

33 PMIU-PESRP 2011:3 High Schools, 9 Middle Schools, 736 Primary Schools and 148 Mosque Schools were closed<br />

34 http:/www.dsd.edu.pk/page_id=1070<br />

58


3.2.9: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

The major policy implementation issue is to achieve Universal Primary <strong>Education</strong> (UPE). The<br />

Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) <strong>in</strong>clude eradicat<strong>in</strong>g extreme poverty, expand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

education, reduc<strong>in</strong>g child mortality rates, fight<strong>in</strong>g disease epidemics and develop<strong>in</strong>g a global<br />

partnership for development. The second and third Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)<br />

specifically address education: improvements <strong>in</strong> literacy, primary and secondary education and<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> gender disparities <strong>in</strong> education. Target 4 deals with elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> gender disparity <strong>in</strong><br />

primary and secondary education and at all levels <strong>of</strong> education, no later than 2015. Recent statistics<br />

on <strong>Punjab</strong>’s education <strong>in</strong>dicators show that gender parity <strong>in</strong>dices would hopefully meet the MDG<br />

targets by 2015 but <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> other targets, Pakistan is at the serious risk <strong>of</strong> not achiev<strong>in</strong>g MDGs.<br />

Achiev<strong>in</strong>g other targets would require enhanced commitment and <strong>in</strong>tensive efforts. For example,<br />

universal primary education will require expansion <strong>of</strong> primary education through both formal as<br />

well as non-formal means; through public as well as private sectors; improv<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>of</strong><br />

education; <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g community participation and other possible strategies.The needs, target groups<br />

and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2<br />

3.3: Elementary <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.3.1: <strong>Policy</strong><br />

NEP 2009 enjo<strong>in</strong>s the cont<strong>in</strong>uation and retention <strong>of</strong> students at Elementary level s<strong>in</strong>ce there are<br />

substantial drop-outs. The <strong>Policy</strong> focuses attention on two large and critical problems fac<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

sector: (i) low participation and narrow base <strong>of</strong> the sector, and (ii) weak quality <strong>of</strong> provision.<br />

Despite some progress <strong>in</strong> recent years, access rates rema<strong>in</strong> low. Of those who succeed <strong>in</strong><br />

complet<strong>in</strong>g Grade-V, there is a further loss to the system through those not mak<strong>in</strong>g the transition to<br />

the elementary and secondary level. NEP 2009 envisaged that all children, boys and girls,<br />

shall be brought <strong>in</strong>side school by the year 2015and they must complete compulsory secondary level<br />

<strong>of</strong> education. Official age for primary education shall be 6 to 10 years. The <strong>of</strong>ficial age group for<br />

next levels <strong>of</strong> education shall also change accord<strong>in</strong>gly. Government shall make efforts to provide<br />

the necessary f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources to achieve the EFA goals. NEP 2009 further elaborates that<br />

wherever feasible, primary schools shall be upgraded to middle level. International Development<br />

Partners shall be <strong>in</strong>vited through a well-developed plan for expand<strong>in</strong>g school facilities. High<br />

priority shall be paid to reduc<strong>in</strong>g the drop-out rates. An important element <strong>of</strong> this effort should be<br />

to provide f<strong>in</strong>ancial and food support to children who drop-out because <strong>of</strong> poverty. Food based<br />

<strong>in</strong>centives shall be <strong>in</strong>troduced to <strong>in</strong>crease enrolment and improve retention and completion rates,<br />

especially for girls.<br />

3.3.2: Current Status, Key Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Table 38-40 below <strong>in</strong>dicates the state <strong>of</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> Middle Schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. The number <strong>of</strong> Middle<br />

Schools <strong>in</strong> 2000-01 was 6227 (2558 male & 3669 female) with an enrollment <strong>of</strong> 15, 18,000 with<br />

34439 teach<strong>in</strong>g staff. The number <strong>of</strong> Middle Schools soared to 7534 <strong>in</strong> 2009-10 (3163 male & 4371<br />

female) with a teach<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>of</strong> 41208. When compared the progression <strong>of</strong> Middle Schools to<br />

Primary Schools, it is evident that the number <strong>of</strong> Primary Schools decreased from 44068 <strong>in</strong> 2000-01<br />

43970 <strong>in</strong> 2009-10 whereas the teach<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> 2000-01 was 62072 reduced to 55797 <strong>in</strong> 2009-10.<br />

This is also <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> the fact that Government concentrat<strong>in</strong>g on up-gradation <strong>of</strong> the Primary<br />

Schools to Middle Schools whereas the issue <strong>of</strong> access at Primary level was not addressed and<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Primary Schools did not keep pace with the population growth <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. This<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong>to more population <strong>of</strong> children out-<strong>of</strong>-school. The demand created encouraged low cost<br />

private school system. This also corroborates with the surveys on the subject. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to PIHS<br />

59


2001, the share <strong>of</strong> private sector <strong>in</strong> education at Primary level was 21%. The National <strong>Education</strong><br />

Census 2006 recorded the share <strong>of</strong> private sector as high as 42%, the double <strong>of</strong> 2001. The space<br />

created by the absence <strong>of</strong> Government Schools was partially occupied by the private sector.<br />

However, the bigger loss has been <strong>in</strong> the shape <strong>of</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-schools children missed by Government<br />

Schools but at the same time not enrolled <strong>in</strong> low cost private schools. PEF schools are functional at<br />

primary, elementary and secondary level. In case <strong>of</strong> far flung areas, with no higher secondary<br />

schools for girls, PEF has started the process <strong>of</strong> up-gradation <strong>of</strong> the secondary school for girls. GER<br />

and NER for the middle level with age group 10-12 years old have also been analyzed <strong>in</strong> PSLM<br />

2010-11.<br />

GER for the middle level, for Pakistan as a whole, rema<strong>in</strong>ed almost same as 2008-09 i.e. 54 percent.<br />

The middle level enrolment <strong>in</strong> urban areas also rema<strong>in</strong>ed the same as <strong>in</strong> 2008-09 i.e. 71% as<br />

compared to 47% and 46% <strong>in</strong> 2008-09 <strong>in</strong> rural areas. Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> for middle class is top<br />

ranked <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>, whereas Rajanpur is at 20% and is at the bottom. NERs at the middle level are<br />

much lower than gross enrolment rates. This is due to the large number <strong>of</strong> overage children that are<br />

enrolled <strong>in</strong> these classes. The district level comparison with<strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces depicts that more or<br />

less NERs have the same patterns which are observed for GERs PSLM 2010-11 and the figures <strong>in</strong><br />

the tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate that GER at the middle level (age 10-12) <strong>in</strong> urban areas is 73% whereas it<br />

is 70% for male and 77% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas it is 58% whereas it is 61% for male and<br />

55% for females. GER for female is higher <strong>in</strong> urban area than rural areas. The overall GER at the<br />

middle level (age 10-12) is 58 % whereas it is 61% for male and 55% for female.<br />

PSLM 2010-11 and the figures <strong>in</strong> the tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate that NER at the middle level (age 10-12)<br />

<strong>in</strong> urban areas is 31% whereas it is 29% for male and 34% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas it is<br />

19% whereas it is 21% for male and 17% for females. NER for female is higher <strong>in</strong> urban area than<br />

rural areas. The overall NER at the middle level (age 10-12) is 23 % whereas it is 23% for male and<br />

22% for female.<br />

60


Table 38: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Middle Level (Age 10-12)<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

DISTRICT<br />

RANK TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

08-09<br />

Pakistan 70 73 71 55 37 47 59 48 54 53<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 70 77 73 57 46 52 61 55 58 57<br />

Attock 76 110 90 87 84 86 85 90 87 4 91<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 99 95 97 75 86 79 85 90 88 3 86<br />

Jhelum 112 87 100 75 81 78 82 83 82 6 87<br />

Chakwal 89 83 86 86 102 93 86 98 92 2 89<br />

Sargodha 82 88 85 72 39 56 74 52 64 16 65<br />

Bhakkar 68 78 73 58 19 40 59 28 45 29 52<br />

Khushab 75 86 80 77 57 68 77 64 71 8 64<br />

Mianwali 68 76 72 77 45 62 76 51 64 15 53<br />

Faisalabad 80 79 80 64 55 60 71 65 68 12 65<br />

Jhang 49 60 54 54 36 45 53 42 47 25 48<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 62 91 76 63 68 65 63 73 68 13 64<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 54 79 66 55 18 39 55 35 46 27<br />

Gujranwala 71 64 68 65 82 72 68 73 70 10 71<br />

Gujrat 81 68 74 63 91 76 68 84 76 7 85<br />

Sialkot 82 85 83 77 100 87 78 96 86 5 76<br />

Hafizabad 69 70 69 68 45 57 68 52 61 18 61<br />

Mandi 75 112 92 66 55 60 68 62 65 14 65<br />

Narowal 64 90 76 70 65 68 69 69 69 11 64<br />

Lahore 65 80 72 63 67 65 65 77 70 9 71<br />

Kasur 66 72 69 73 49 61 71 55 63 17 48<br />

Sheikhupura 63 81 72 55 45 51 58 57 57 21 61<br />

Nankana Sahib 59 72 64 63 54 59 62 58 60 19 60<br />

Vehari 62 70 67 52 34 43 53 41 47 26 42<br />

Multan 60 65 62 45 37 41 50 46 48 24 46<br />

Khanewal 71 107 90 61 35 48 62 47 55 22 51<br />

Lodhran 53 42 47 44 26 35 45 27 36 34 48<br />

D.G.Khan 60 75 68 38 12 26 40 19 31 36 34<br />

Rajanpur 83 63 71 19 7 14 23 15 20 37 17<br />

Layyah 56 68 61 53 25 39 53 30 42 30 49<br />

Muzaffargarh 69 71 70 32 22 27 37 28 33 35 40<br />

Bahawalpur 50 67 58 36 28 32 40 40 40 32 36<br />

Bahawalnagar 53 62 56 56 41 49 55 45 50 23 33<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 59 81 69 41 27 34 44 37 41 31 37<br />

Sahiwal 65 82 73 63 47 55 63 52 58 20 52<br />

Pakpatten 73 67 70 39 21 32 43 29 37 33 44<br />

Okara 63 66 64 54 31 43 55 35 46 28 54<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

61


Table 39: Net Enrolment Rate at the Middle Level (Age10-12)<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

TOTAL<br />

DISTRICTS MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANK 08-09<br />

Pakistan 27 31 29 19 14 17 22 19 20 20<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 29 34 31 21 17 19 23 22 23 22<br />

Attock 24 44 32 26 35 29 25 37 30 7 28<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 33 41 37 34 35 34 33 38 35 3 32<br />

Jhelum 51 40 45 31 32 31 35 34 34 5 25<br />

Chakwal 40 46 43 38 40 39 38 41 40 2 37<br />

Sargodha 38 40 39 26 12 19 29 20 25 16 24<br />

Bhakkar 30 30 30 17 6 12 19 10 15 31 16<br />

Khushab 33 28 31 33 27 31 33 28 31 6 21<br />

Mianwali 29 37 33 29 16 23 29 20 25 13 19<br />

Faisalabad 31 34 32 26 23 24 28 27 28 11 25<br />

Jhang 28 21 25 20 15 17 22 16 19 23 22<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 31 32 31 27 29 28 28 30 29 9 23<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 23 23 23 19 8 14 20 12 17 27<br />

Gujranwala 30 26 28 27 30 28 28 28 28 10 25<br />

Gujrat 29 27 28 20 27 24 22 27 25 15 34<br />

Sialkot 38 38 38 32 38 34 33 38 35 4 36<br />

Hafizabad 33 34 34 24 19 22 27 23 25 12 24<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 25 39 31 16 22 19 17 24 21 21 20<br />

Narowal 30 40 34 24 23 24 25 25 25 14 29<br />

Lahore 28 36 31 20 23 22 26 33 30 8 31<br />

Kasur 24 33 29 23 18 20 23 22 23 19 18<br />

Sheikhupura 28 35 31 21 16 19 23 22 23 18 20<br />

Nankana Sahib 26 34 29 24 16 21 25 20 23 17 23<br />

Vehari 22 40 33 19 11 15 19 17 18 25 16<br />

Multan 26 28 27 16 12 14 19 18 18 24 20<br />

Khanewal 24 39 32 13 15 14 14 19 17 26 18<br />

Lodhran 23 14 18 12 9 10 13 10 11 36 16<br />

D.G.Khan 32 41 37 13 4 9 15 8 12 35 15<br />

Rajanpur 31 25 28 5 2 4 7 6 7 37 5<br />

Layyah 16 20 18 16 11 13 16 12 14 34 15<br />

Muzaffargarh 23 44 33 13 8 11 15 13 14 33 17<br />

Bahawalpur 16 30 23 12 10 11 14 16 15 32 14<br />

Bahawalnagar 23 30 26 21 16 19 22 18 20 22 12<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 20 38 28 16 10 13 17 15 16 28 14<br />

Sahiwal 18 36 27 22 20 21 22 22 22 20 20<br />

Pakpatten 25 23 24 18 8 14 19 10 15 29 16<br />

Okara 26 21 24 18 8 13 19 10 15 30 20<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

62


Table 40:-Government Middle Schools for Boys & Girls, Their Enrollment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Staff<br />

Category<br />

/ Year<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Schools Enrolment(‘000') Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Male Female<br />

Middle Schools<br />

2000-01 6227 2558 3669 1518 703 815 63277 28838 34439<br />

2001-02 6579 2675 3904 1664 794 870 69335 29171 40164<br />

2002-03 6875 2797 4078 1686 804 882 74186 31210 42976<br />

2003-04 6801 2753 4048 1682 783 899 62616 28419 34197<br />

2004-05 7196 2965 4231 1936 904 1032 65690 29882 35808<br />

2005-06 7371 3020 4351 2170 1005 1165 67155 30589 36566<br />

2006-07 7400 3048 4352 2230 1010 1220 68168 30972 37196<br />

2007-08 7457 3084 4373 2184 1001 1183 70772 32212 38560<br />

2008-09 7504 3118 4386 2156 1006 1150 71081 31446 39635<br />

2009-10 7534 3163 4371 2129 997 1132 75910 34701 41209<br />

Source:- <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2010, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Box-8: Role <strong>of</strong> PEF <strong>in</strong> Facilitation <strong>of</strong> Low Cost Private Schools<br />

PEF has been restructured as an autonomous organization by an act <strong>of</strong> parliament <strong>in</strong> 2004 to support the<br />

efforts <strong>of</strong> the private sector <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g quality education to poor segment <strong>of</strong> the society. PEF has been<br />

assigned the statutory responsibility to promote education through private educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions by<br />

establish<strong>in</strong>g and nurtur<strong>in</strong>g Public Private Partnership. FAS is the flagship program <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Foundation to encourage and promote the access to and improve the quality <strong>of</strong> education. PEF has<br />

demonstrated that through public private partnership, better quality education can be provided at much less<br />

cost as compared to the cost by the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> to educate a child <strong>in</strong> the public school<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system. The target schools under PEF-FAS are f<strong>in</strong>anced up to a maximum <strong>of</strong> Rs.350 per month for<br />

Elementary Classes and Rs.400 for Secondary Classes as tuition fees and related/allied charges.<br />

• The f<strong>in</strong>ancial assistance to the recipient schools is l<strong>in</strong>ked with the satisfactory performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

schools <strong>in</strong> Quality Assurance Tests (QAT). F<strong>in</strong>ancial assistance will be discont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> case the school<br />

does not meet the quality standards set by the PEF for QAT amended from time to time by Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Directors (BOD).<br />

• Schools are regularly monitored by PEF staff to ensure the basic amenities and teach<strong>in</strong>g aids.<br />

• Good performance schools are awarded based on the QAT result. Modalities are decided by BOD.<br />

Assistance to the Private <strong>Education</strong>al Institutions on Per Child Enrolled Basis and Criteria for Selection.<br />

After enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to partnership with PEF under FAS program, the recipient schools shall not charge<br />

anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> any form from the students i.e. f<strong>in</strong>es, recreation, books fee. Stationery etc. No tuition fee or any<br />

other amount can be charged by the private schools after enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to partnership with PEF.<br />

The education at middle level (Grade-6 to 8) is the crucial threshold for career selection for the<br />

students. Unfortunately there is no career counsel<strong>in</strong>g service available <strong>in</strong> public and private<br />

educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions. As a result students do not develop the secure understand<strong>in</strong>g and mental<br />

attitude for a particular field, they <strong>in</strong>tend to pursue later at Secondary, Higher Secondary and<br />

63


Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Colleges. By now there is a positive move for medium <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>structions <strong>in</strong> English for all<br />

subjects except Urdu and Islamiat. In the past it was difficult for the students to acqua<strong>in</strong>t themselves<br />

with the sudden change <strong>of</strong> medium <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>structions from Urdu to English and face difficulties <strong>in</strong><br />

comprehend<strong>in</strong>g the arcane technical term<strong>in</strong>ologies <strong>in</strong> science subjects.<br />

Middle level education is the stage when students enter adolescent age and need special care and<br />

nurture. The mentors at Elementary level do not have any formal tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to accommodate the<br />

emotional quotient <strong>of</strong> the mentees at this stage. There is a need to <strong>in</strong>troduce this particular segment<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>-service and pre-service teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programmes <strong>in</strong> our <strong>in</strong>stitutions. DSD and UOE<br />

have <strong>in</strong>troduced special curriculum for pre-service and <strong>in</strong>-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to address this particular<br />

issue. There has to be a change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficial m<strong>in</strong>dset. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact there is no competition<br />

between public and private sector. Provision <strong>of</strong> free and compulsory Secondary <strong>Education</strong> is the<br />

statutory obligation <strong>of</strong> the state. Private sector is compensat<strong>in</strong>g the Government obligation, <strong>of</strong>fcourse<br />

with a pr<strong>of</strong>it motive. The major issue is that students must cont<strong>in</strong>ue education beyond<br />

Primary to Middle and Secondary level, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the fact whether he/she is go<strong>in</strong>g to a public<br />

or a private school. The state must facilitate the private sector s<strong>in</strong>ce majority <strong>of</strong> the schools is <strong>in</strong><br />

private sector now 35 .<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has <strong>in</strong>troduced policy <strong>of</strong> public private partnership <strong>in</strong> education. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives was launched <strong>in</strong> 2004 by an enactment through the prov<strong>in</strong>cial legislature i.e. <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> Foundation Act 2004. Through this policy <strong>in</strong>tervention, Government is support<strong>in</strong>g low<br />

cost private schools. Foundation Assisted Schools (FAS) Programme was started as a pilot project<br />

with 54 schools <strong>in</strong> 2005 and now 1800 low cost private schools are <strong>in</strong> partnership with PEF. The<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> service is by private sector with f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g by the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Government<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has enhanced the budgetary allocation from Rs.4 billion <strong>in</strong> 2009-10 to Rs.8 billion <strong>in</strong><br />

2010-11 for private sector low cost schools <strong>in</strong> partnership with PEF.<br />

3.3.3: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

The major issue at elementary level is sharp reduction <strong>in</strong> enrolment. The major reason for low<br />

enrollment <strong>in</strong> Elementary schools is the capacity issues. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Punjab</strong> Development<br />

Statistics 2011 36 Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has 43970 schools at Primary level with an enrollment <strong>of</strong><br />

47, 94,000 students. The number <strong>of</strong> Middle schools is reduced substantially and comes to 7534 with<br />

an enrollment <strong>of</strong> 21, 29,000 students (Annexure-II). Even if it is assumed that some <strong>of</strong> the students<br />

jo<strong>in</strong> private school system charg<strong>in</strong>g fee and expensive <strong>in</strong> nature, it is not difficult to establish that<br />

the students com<strong>in</strong>g from low <strong>in</strong>come families are sure drop-outs. At societal level, this is the first<br />

step towards educational apartheid. In order to address this problem, the def<strong>in</strong>ite way <strong>of</strong><br />

rapprochement is to enhance access at elementary level by open<strong>in</strong>g more schools and up-grad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the exist<strong>in</strong>g primary schools where school strength has risen beyond 500 students. One may<br />

question the <strong>in</strong>adequate fund<strong>in</strong>g and resources for open<strong>in</strong>g new schools but Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

Mahathir Muhammad <strong>of</strong> Malaysia once said, “Where there is a will, there is a way. But if there is a<br />

way, will can be found”. <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation (PEF) has <strong>in</strong>troduced Foundation Assisted<br />

School (FAS) model. FAS works on public private partnership model under the aegis <strong>of</strong> PEF, an<br />

autonomous organization under SED. Through FAS, it has been demonstrated that better and<br />

affordable quality education can be provided at much lesser cost as compared to public school<br />

35<br />

36<br />

There is no <strong>of</strong>ficial Census available <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the exact number, enrollment and bifurcation <strong>of</strong> teachers and<br />

students <strong>in</strong> private sector. The only source available is All Pakistan Private School Association. With the<br />

publication <strong>of</strong> the latest Census, the factual figures will come out.<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Lahore<br />

64


system <strong>in</strong> public private partnership 37 . At the moment, PEF has entered <strong>in</strong>to partnership with 1760<br />

schools with 1.5 million children, gett<strong>in</strong>g quality education <strong>in</strong> public private partnership at<br />

affordable cost. The needs, target groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong><br />

Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2<br />

3.4 : Secondary and Higher Secondary <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.4.1: <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to NEP 2009, the secondary and higher secondary school system prepares young people<br />

for life. It has two important roles <strong>in</strong> this respect–provid<strong>in</strong>g skills to the labor market, as many<br />

students leave formal school <strong>in</strong> gat this time and provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>put to the tertiary system, for those<br />

who go on to this level <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g. The system does not provide an adequate base for both these<br />

functions. Quite apart from the quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction at this level, a central question that Pakistan<br />

education policy makers confront is the level <strong>of</strong> skill development and preparation that can be<br />

achieved by twelve years <strong>of</strong> school education as a term<strong>in</strong>al qualification. NEP 2009 further<br />

observed that the system as it exists has short com<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> two ma<strong>in</strong> respects, it has an arrow base<br />

that leaves a large number <strong>of</strong> young people outside the system and the quality <strong>of</strong> skills it produces<br />

is not well matched with the needs <strong>of</strong> the labor market.<br />

NEP 2009 identified that access and participation rates at this level <strong>of</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Pakistan are<br />

low <strong>in</strong> comparison to reference countries. Pakistan’s national average ratio <strong>of</strong> secondary to primary<br />

school is 1:6 but, <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> the country, it reaches the high figure <strong>of</strong> 1:13. There is a clear<br />

need for expand<strong>in</strong>g the provision. At the same time, efforts have to be made to cut the high dropout<br />

rates and <strong>in</strong>duce more out <strong>of</strong> school youths back to the school system, particularly the girls<br />

whose participation is still very low.<br />

3.4.2: Current Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

• Provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> at Secondary and Higher Secondary levels shall be expanded,<br />

particularly <strong>in</strong> the rural areas and <strong>of</strong> schools dedicated for girls. Priority shall be given to<br />

those locations where the ratio <strong>of</strong> secondary schools is low.<br />

• Student support shall be <strong>in</strong>creased to prevent students from dropp<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>of</strong> school for<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial reasons.<br />

• Schools shall <strong>in</strong>troduce more student-centered pedagogies.<br />

• Counsel<strong>in</strong>g facilities shall be made available to students from the elementary level onwards<br />

<strong>in</strong> order to constructively utilize their energy, to deal with any displays <strong>of</strong> aggression<br />

amongst young students and to address any other psychological distress that a student may<br />

be <strong>in</strong>, by suggest<strong>in</strong>g a suitable remedy.<br />

• Life Skills-Based <strong>Education</strong> (LSBE) shall be promoted.<br />

• Sports activities shall be organized at the Secondary and Higher Secondary Levels.<br />

• Counsel<strong>in</strong>g at higher secondary level must also address the career concerns <strong>of</strong> young<br />

students and encourage them to take up studies as per their aptitude other than the accepted<br />

fields <strong>of</strong> study, be it technical, vocational or any other area <strong>of</strong> study<br />

• School<strong>in</strong>g shall also be made more attractive by add<strong>in</strong>g community service programmes.<br />

• Grades XI and XII shall not be part <strong>of</strong> the college level and shall be merged <strong>in</strong>to the school<br />

level form<strong>in</strong>g part <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g secondary schools, where needed and provision <strong>of</strong> necessary<br />

37 Malik, A.B (2010): Asian Development Bank, Public Private Partnerships <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong>: Lessons Learned from the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation. http://www.adb.org/documents/reports/ppp-education-punjab/ppp-educationpunjab.pdf<br />

65


human and physical resources shall be ensured. This exercise shall be undertaken after a<br />

detailed studies <strong>of</strong> the failures <strong>of</strong> previous such efforts.<br />

• A system for rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> primary and secondary educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions across the country<br />

shall be <strong>in</strong>troduced with rank<strong>in</strong>gs based on result outcomes, extra-curricular activities and<br />

facilities provided to the students, <strong>in</strong> order to encourage healthy competition between<br />

schools.<br />

• To create an order for excellence <strong>in</strong> the country, National Merit Programme shall be<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced to a ward bright students<br />

Tables 41-45 are figures from PSLM 2010-11 and Table 46 <strong>in</strong>dicates latest figures published by<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>. Table 41 <strong>in</strong>dicates gross enrolment at Matric level (Age 13-14) and<br />

stands at 57 percent as compared to 54 percent <strong>in</strong> 2008-09 and net enrolment rate are stable at<br />

12%. Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di with 103% has the highest enrollment as compared to Rajanpur with 19%.<br />

PSLM 2010-11 and the figures <strong>in</strong> the tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate that GER at the matric level (age 13-<br />

14) <strong>in</strong> urban areas is 79% whereas it is 80% for male and 77% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas it<br />

is 47% whereas it is 57% for male and 35% for females. The overall GER at the matric level (age<br />

13-14) is 57 % whereas it is 65% for male and 49% for female.<br />

PSLM 2010-11 and the figures <strong>in</strong> the tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate that GER at the matric level (age 14-<br />

15) <strong>in</strong> urban areas is 75% whereas it is 75% for male and 75% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas it<br />

is 50% whereas it is 55% for male and 34% for females. The overall GER at the matric level (age<br />

14-15) is 59 % whereas it is 63% for male and 56% for female.<br />

PSLM 2010-11 and the figures <strong>in</strong> the tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate that NER at the matric level (age 13-<br />

14) <strong>in</strong> urban areas is 18% whereas it is 16% for male and 20% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas it<br />

is 9% whereas it is 10% for male and 8% for females. The overall NER at the matric level (age<br />

13-14) is 14 % whereas it is 13% for male and 16% for female.<br />

PSLM 2010-11 and the figures <strong>in</strong> the tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate that NER at the matric level (age 14-<br />

15) <strong>in</strong> urban areas is 35% whereas it is 32% for male and 38% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas it<br />

is 20% whereas it is 21% for male and 19% for females. The overall NER at the matric level (age<br />

14-15) is 25 % whereas it is 24% for male and 25% for female.<br />

66


Table 41: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Matric Level (Age 13-14)<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

DISTRICTS MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

RANK<br />

TOTAL<br />

08-09<br />

Pakistan 80 77 79 57 35 47 65 49 57 54<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 80 82 81 59 44 52 65 56 61 57<br />

Attock 90 93 91 55 55 55 63 62 63 18 70<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 100 101 101 112 95 104 107 98 103 1 93<br />

Jhelum 107 92 100 114 77 94 112 80 95 4 79<br />

Chakwal 110 145 127 106 82 94 107 88 97 3 102<br />

Sargodha 70 70 70 59 50 55 62 57 60 20 60<br />

Bhakkar 119 57 84 47 24 37 55 30 43 29 51<br />

Khushab 130 63 95 88 42 64 100 48 73 7 58<br />

Mianwali 125 54 87 75 55 65 85 55 70 10 68<br />

Faisalabad 79 74 77 80 51 66 80 61 71 9 59<br />

Jhang 79 60 70 54 35 45 61 42 51 24 43<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 84 67 76 63 64 64 69 65 67 11 63<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 97 31 62 55 9 32 68 16 42 31<br />

Gujranwala 84 93 89 64 73 69 75 83 79 6 66<br />

Gujrat 93 83 88 74 46 58 79 55 65 13 69<br />

Sialkot 68 81 75 47 59 53 51 64 58 22 72<br />

Hafizabad 82 85 83 67 45 57 71 58 65 15 50<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 86 95 91 67 48 58 70 56 63 16 54<br />

Narowal 83 84 84 56 60 58 60 65 62 19 66<br />

Lahore 80 92 87 77 57 68 79 87 84 5 87<br />

Kasur 82 89 86 67 50 59 70 59 65 14 52<br />

Sheikhupura 62 96 76 57 54 55 59 67 63 17 58<br />

Nankana Sahib 55 90 69 75 69 72 70 73 71 8 64<br />

Vehari 58 87 70 56 31 44 57 41 49 27 40<br />

Multan 77 61 70 53 32 43 62 42 52 23 48<br />

Khanewal 113 66 88 46 27 37 56 35 46 28 52<br />

Lodhran 49 65 55 42 21 33 43 26 36 35 45<br />

D.G.Khan 66 71 68 35 8 24 38 19 30 36 40<br />

Rajanpur 66 84 75 16 6 12 20 17 19 37 22<br />

Layyah 74 70 72 62 20 43 64 32 49 26 42<br />

Muzaffargarh 90 57 74 32 32 32 40 35 37 34 29<br />

Bahawalpur 49 78 62 37 24 31 41 41 41 32 42<br />

Bahawalnagar 60 76 68 57 34 45 58 43 50 25 32<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 70 75 72 40 24 33 48 36 42 30 34<br />

Sahiwal 83 75 78 70 59 64 72 62 67 12 56<br />

Pakpatten 35 84 62 50 22 35 47 33 40 33 38<br />

Okara 87 88 88 66 40 54 69 48 59 21 54<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

67


Table 42: Gross Enrolment Rate at the Matric Level (Age14-15)<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 75 75 75 54 34 45 61 48 55<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 78 83 80 56 43 50 63 56 59<br />

Attock 75 77 76 50 62 56 56 66 60<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 83 105 93 113 85 99 99 93 96<br />

Jhelum 80 77 79 116 84 99 104 82 93<br />

Chakwal 101 73 84 103 75 88 103 74 87<br />

Sargodha 72 74 73 54 42 49 58 52 56<br />

Bhakkar 89 55 72 44 23 35 50 28 40<br />

Khushab 146 79 113 88 37 59 103 46 72<br />

Mianwali 111 65 90 72 54 64 81 56 69<br />

Faisalabad 83 71 78 67 52 60 74 60 68<br />

Jhang 68 64 66 50 34 42 55 41 48<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 90 67 79 51 65 57 59 66 62<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 91 31 61 56 9 33 67 17 42<br />

Gujranwala 85 94 89 73 64 68 80 78 79<br />

Gujrat 79 84 81 58 51 55 63 60 61<br />

Sialkot 75 106 89 56 66 61 61 74 67<br />

Hafizabad 72 70 71 70 43 57 70 53 62<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 72 89 81 71 47 59 71 55 63<br />

Narowal 86 77 81 54 55 54 58 59 59<br />

Lahore 81 99 90 72 50 62 79 91 85<br />

Kasur 69 76 72 71 45 59 70 53 62<br />

Sheikhupura 58 84 69 52 52 52 55 63 58<br />

Nankana Sahib 53 67 59 72 79 75 67 76 71<br />

Vehari 74 94 83 46 33 40 51 42 47<br />

Multan 75 56 67 45 36 41 56 44 50<br />

Khanewal 96 63 79 48 24 36 57 31 44<br />

Lodhran 50 47 49 48 19 34 48 23 36<br />

D.G.Khan 69 76 72 32 9 24 36 21 30<br />

Rajanpur 66 80 74 21 8 16 27 22 25<br />

Layyah 71 80 76 56 22 43 59 36 49<br />

Muzaffargarh 80 61 72 32 35 33 39 38 39<br />

Bahawalpur 45 78 59 39 24 32 41 41 41<br />

Bahawalnagar 71 65 68 55 31 42 58 38 48<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 63 81 70 38 23 31 44 36 41<br />

Sahiwal 85 66 73 60 57 59 63 58 61<br />

Pakpatten 48 72 64 43 21 33 44 32 38<br />

Okara 99 84 92 68 34 51 73 41 57<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

68


Table 43: Net Enrolment Rate at the Matric Level (Age13-14)<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

RANK<br />

TOTAL<br />

08-09<br />

Pakistan 16 20 18 10 8 9 12 12 12 12<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 17 25 21 11 11 11 13 16 14 13<br />

Attock 27 33 30 10 12 11 13 16 15 15 10<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 12 22 17 19 32 25 16 27 21 2 16<br />

Jhelum 14 23 18 20 13 16 18 15 16 10 11<br />

Chakwal 26 25 26 29 15 22 29 16 22 1 14<br />

Sargodha 14 25 20 14 14 14 14 18 16 12 16<br />

Bhakkar 23 18 20 13 8 11 14 10 12 25 16<br />

Khushab 16 13 15 17 12 14 17 12 14 17 8<br />

Mianwali 30 19 24 15 20 17 18 20 19 6 16<br />

Faisalabad 12 24 17 19 16 17 16 19 17 7 13<br />

Jhang 17 12 14 19 7 13 19 8 14 19 13<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 22 18 20 16 16 16 18 17 17 8 13<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 27 11 19 7 7 7 13 8 11 30<br />

Gujranwala 20 32 26 9 18 14 15 25 20 5 17<br />

Gujrat 18 27 23 10 13 12 12 17 15 16 17<br />

Sialkot 21 37 29 5 17 11 8 22 15 13 18<br />

Hafizabad 16 22 19 12 13 13 13 16 15 14 9<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 8 23 16 9 12 10 9 14 11 27 13<br />

Narowal 37 32 34 13 14 14 16 18 17 9 16<br />

Lahore 13 31 23 13 10 12 13 28 21 4 22<br />

Kasur 27 17 22 12 11 11 15 12 14 18 10<br />

Sheikhupura 25 26 25 8 14 11 15 18 16 11 11<br />

Nankana Sahib 3 18 9 18 6 12 14 8 11 28 11<br />

Vehari 21 22 21 13 9 11 15 11 13 21 11<br />

Multan 16 23 19 8 9 9 11 14 12 24 14<br />

Khanewal 24 7 15 7 4 5 10 5 7 35 10<br />

Lodhran 12 14 13 16 9 13 16 10 13 22 15<br />

D.G.Khan 25 26 25 6 1 4 8 6 7 36 10<br />

Rajanpur 16 22 19 2 2 2 4 5 4 37 7<br />

Layyah 13 18 16 9 2 6 10 6 8 33 9<br />

Muzaffargarh 20 17 19 10 9 9 11 10 11 29 9<br />

Bahawalpur 13 17 15 4 3 4 7 8 7 34 7<br />

Bahawalnagar 22 17 20 12 10 11 15 12 13 20 8<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 26 16 22 6 7 6 11 9 10 31 10<br />

Sahiwal 16 21 19 11 10 11 12 12 12 26 15<br />

Pakpatten 10 27 20 8 8 8 8 11 10 32 9<br />

Okara 18 17 17 12 12 12 13 13 13 23 14<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

69


Table 44: Net Enrolment Rate at Matric Level (Age 14-15)<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL<br />

Pakistan 32 34 33 21 15 18 24 21 23<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 32 38 35 21 19 20 24 25 25<br />

Attock 47 38 43 14 19 16 22 24 23<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 28 41 34 39 43 41 34 42 38<br />

Jhelum 17 46 29 31 32 32 26 36 31<br />

Chakwal 56 61 59 39 34 37 41 38 40<br />

Sargodha 32 55 44 26 16 21 27 28 28<br />

Bhakkar 21 20 20 23 13 18 22 14 19<br />

Khushab 40 21 31 41 18 28 41 19 29<br />

Mianwali 43 23 34 28 15 22 31 16 24<br />

Faisalabad 33 38 35 34 23 29 34 29 32<br />

Jhang 30 29 30 30 16 23 30 19 25<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 46 29 37 19 25 21 24 26 25<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 23 22 23 17 7 12 19 12 15<br />

Gujranwala 37 46 42 18 31 26 29 38 34<br />

Gujrat 36 50 43 28 20 24 30 28 29<br />

Sialkot 38 40 39 11 26 19 17 29 23<br />

Hafizabad 16 40 29 26 18 22 23 26 24<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 33 43 38 23 22 23 25 26 25<br />

Narowal 50 55 53 24 23 23 27 28 28<br />

Lahore 32 42 37 19 24 21 29 39 34<br />

Kasur 27 38 33 23 24 23 24 27 26<br />

Sheikhupura 34 42 37 20 17 18 25 26 25<br />

Nankana Sahib 13 29 20 28 32 30 24 31 27<br />

Vehari 28 21 25 23 13 18 24 14 19<br />

Multan 23 27 25 16 13 15 19 18 19<br />

Khanewal 45 35 40 12 10 11 19 15 17<br />

Lodhran 13 32 22 22 11 17 21 14 17<br />

D.G.Khan 41 29 35 17 5 13 19 9 16<br />

Rajanpur 30 24 27 7 4 6 10 8 9<br />

Layyah 25 32 29 15 2 10 16 10 14<br />

Muzaffargarh 28 27 28 16 13 15 18 15 16<br />

Bahawalpur 24 31 27 7 11 9 13 17 15<br />

Bahawalnagar 26 27 27 21 18 20 22 20 21<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 35 23 30 13 14 13 18 16 17<br />

Sahiwal 57 28 39 19 24 22 24 25 24<br />

Pakpatten 15 39 31 19 15 17 18 19 19<br />

Okara 33 46 39 22 18 20 24 22 23<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

Table 45 below <strong>in</strong>dicates the state <strong>of</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> High Schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. There were 4430 High<br />

Schools <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce (2928 male & 1502 females) with 33062 teach<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> 2000-01. Like<br />

Middle Schools the number <strong>of</strong> high schools public sector rose to 4839 (2974 male & 1865 females),<br />

with 37957 teach<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> 2009-10. The former Secretaries <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department were<br />

70


<strong>in</strong>terviewed on this particular phenomenon 38 . They were <strong>of</strong> the view that private sector came <strong>in</strong> a<br />

big way to establish low cost private schools at primary level but were shy to establish Middle and<br />

High Schools. The major reason for not enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this particular arena was the capital <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

required for Libraries, Science Laboratories and Computer Laboratories accord<strong>in</strong>g to the standards<br />

specified by the School <strong>Education</strong> Department and respective Boards <strong>of</strong> Intermediate and<br />

Secondary <strong>Education</strong> for registration <strong>of</strong> Middle and High Schools. The registration <strong>of</strong> the schools is<br />

a pre-requisite for the students <strong>of</strong> these private schools to appear <strong>in</strong> the PEC and BISE<br />

Exam<strong>in</strong>ations. However, there is a change <strong>in</strong> the scenario and low cost private primary schools have<br />

started up-grad<strong>in</strong>g their <strong>in</strong>stitutions to elementary and secondary level gradually after fulfill<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial requirements <strong>of</strong> SED and BISE.<br />

Table 45:-Government High Schools for Boys & Girls, Their Enrollment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Category<br />

/ Year<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Schools Enrolment(‘000') Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Male Female<br />

High Schools<br />

2000-01 4430 2928 1502 2530 1573 957 96086 63024 33062<br />

2001-02 4354 2884 1470 2515 1531 984 88355 57373 30982<br />

2002-03 4464 2959 1505 2549 1551 998 94537 61388 33149<br />

2003-04 4466 2924 1542 2667 1641 1026 83749 54029 29720<br />

2004-05 4482 2929 1553 2789 1694 1095 83103 53520 29583<br />

2005-06 4498 2938 1560 3000 1821 1179 83472 53717 29755<br />

2006-07 4541 2932 1609 3063 1842 1221 84449 54078 30371<br />

2007-08 4669 2958 1711 3074 1823 1251 89117 56089 33028<br />

2008-09 4717 2960 1757 3050 1807 1243 90245 55663 34582<br />

2009-10 4839 2974 1865 3051 1774 1277 97798 59841 37957<br />

Source: - <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

One can easily understand the rapid expansion <strong>of</strong> private school system and 40% drop-out rate <strong>in</strong><br />

Grade V and 77% drop-outs at Elementary level. The Primary School consists <strong>of</strong> classes 1-5,<br />

Elementary School 0-8, High School 0-10 and Higher Secondary School 0-12. The quality is a<br />

serious issue <strong>in</strong> public schools. The private sector has tagged all their schools as English Medium<br />

Schools. The parents are ready to pay for their children <strong>in</strong> a private school <strong>in</strong> search <strong>of</strong> quality. The<br />

results announced by Government owned and run Boards <strong>of</strong> Intermediate and Secondary <strong>Education</strong><br />

and <strong>Punjab</strong> Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Commission <strong>in</strong> 2011, <strong>in</strong>dicate that quality <strong>in</strong> private schools is better than<br />

public schools. The most recent results announced by the Boards <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> testify that all top<br />

positions have gone to private schools. The reasons <strong>of</strong> deterioration <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>in</strong> education <strong>in</strong> public<br />

schools are many. This <strong>in</strong>cludes teacher’s absenteeism, truancy, corporal punishment, political<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> the post<strong>in</strong>gs and transfers <strong>of</strong> teachers, absence <strong>of</strong> accountability and transparency<br />

mechanism and above all no impact <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> compensat<strong>in</strong>g feedback <strong>in</strong> to the system on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation reports submitted by District Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Officers <strong>in</strong> the Districts.<br />

38 The former Secretaries <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department, Mr. Khalid Akhlaq Gillani, Mr. Hasan Nawaz Tarar, Mr.<br />

Imtiaz Tajwar, Mr. Zahid Saeed and Mr. Afaq Hussa<strong>in</strong> Qazi were <strong>in</strong>terviewed.<br />

71


3.4.3: Vision <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department 39<br />

Enlightened and prosperous <strong>Punjab</strong> re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g knowledge economy through equitable, quality<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g at tertiary level<br />

3.4.4: <strong>Policy</strong> Interventions <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

• Improv<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>of</strong> education<br />

• Provid<strong>in</strong>g opportunity for equitable access to Higher <strong>Education</strong><br />

• Rehabilitation and development <strong>of</strong> college <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

• Revamp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> college education by develop<strong>in</strong>g strong relationship between tertiary<br />

<strong>Education</strong> and job market<br />

3.4.5: Objectives/Strategic Interventions <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

• Improv<strong>in</strong>g college <strong>in</strong>frastructure through provision <strong>of</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g and additional facilities for<br />

public sector colleges<br />

• Promotion <strong>of</strong> Science and Computer education at tertiary level<br />

• Capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Managers and Adm<strong>in</strong>istrators <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

• Use <strong>of</strong> Management Information System for decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation system<br />

• Provision <strong>of</strong> merit scholarships for pr<strong>of</strong>essional education<br />

3.4.6: Reforms <strong>in</strong>itiated by Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

Internal Merit Scholarship for Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Students<br />

To recognize the brilliance <strong>of</strong> talented students, a scheme for grant <strong>of</strong> scholarship for<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional students has been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Development Programme 2010-11.<br />

Parameters <strong>of</strong> the Scheme<br />

• The Scholarship is for degree program and will be paid annually and cont<strong>in</strong>ue for<br />

full study cycle. It covers annual academic charges <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitution (tuition fee etc.)<br />

as well as other expenses.<br />

• The Scholarship is to be awarded on merit, to the students enrolled <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the Public Sector Universities/Institutions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> and is not to be<br />

awarded to the students admitted <strong>in</strong> the university on any quota or self-f<strong>in</strong>ance basis.<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Endowment Fund<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong>al Endowment Fund (PEEF) is an <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

with the objective <strong>of</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g scholarships/monetary assistance to talented and needy<br />

students for pursu<strong>in</strong>g quality education with equal opportunities. To make it more efficient,<br />

transparent and autonomous <strong>in</strong> its function<strong>in</strong>g, it has been established under Section 42 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Companies Ord<strong>in</strong>ance, 1984. The Endowment fund has been established with <strong>in</strong>itial seed<br />

money <strong>of</strong> Rs 2 billion, which is proposed to be raised subsequently. Investment proceeds out<br />

<strong>of</strong> this fund will be utilized for provid<strong>in</strong>g the scholarship. At this po<strong>in</strong>t, students belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to Government <strong>in</strong>stitutions are considered for these scholarships, however, it will be<br />

extended to other sectors <strong>in</strong> due course <strong>of</strong> time. Allocation <strong>of</strong> these scholarships will be on<br />

this basis <strong>of</strong> tehsil and district wise results <strong>of</strong> students. Special treatment will be given to the<br />

students <strong>of</strong> fifteen less developed districts <strong>of</strong> the Southern <strong>Punjab</strong>, Special quotas for<br />

orphans, children <strong>of</strong> Government employees (up to BS-14), disabled, m<strong>in</strong>orities and widows<br />

have also been allocated. Bright and needy students <strong>of</strong> other prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Azad<br />

Kashmir will also be provided opportunities for higher education through this programme.<br />

39<br />

Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Development Programme 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

72


(iv)<br />

(v)<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Miss<strong>in</strong>g Facilities <strong>in</strong> Colleges<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Government has embarked upon a comprehensive plan to enhance the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

college education with special focus on improvement <strong>of</strong> physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>of</strong> college.<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector Reforms Programme (PESRP) was launched <strong>in</strong> college sector <strong>in</strong><br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 2006-2007. Under PESRP, the department is provid<strong>in</strong>g miss<strong>in</strong>g/additional<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure facilities like boundary wall, toilets, build<strong>in</strong>g, furniture etc. to the colleges all<br />

over the <strong>Punjab</strong>. For provision <strong>of</strong> facilities to colleges (non-civil work) like transport and<br />

equipment, an umbrella scheme has been approved by the PDWP for a cost <strong>of</strong> Rs 1068.810<br />

million. In f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 2009-10, 900 computers were purchased for 376 colleges <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Other items will be purchased for all the colleges <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 2010-11. It<br />

is pert<strong>in</strong>ent to mention that 14 items are meant to be provided under the mega project.<br />

4 Years BS Program<br />

Title <strong>of</strong> Project<br />

College Sector Reforms Program<br />

Cost<br />

Rs 1000 million<br />

Allocation for 2010-11<br />

Rs 150 million<br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department has also decided to <strong>in</strong>troduce 4 years BS program <strong>in</strong> the<br />

public sector college through the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. For the purpose 26 colleges have been identified<br />

so far. The scheme would be extended to all the colleges <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> the com<strong>in</strong>g<br />

years. The program has already been launched by the public sector universities and now it<br />

will be <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>in</strong> the public sector colleges.<br />

(vi) Provision <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Blocks 40<br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department <strong>in</strong>tends to provide post graduate facility at all District<br />

Headquarters and for the purpose 24 sites have been identified where post graduate facility<br />

is not available either for male or female population <strong>of</strong> area. The above mentioned scheme,<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the ADP, will be executed through NLC.<br />

Table 46: Trend <strong>of</strong> Allocations (Rs. In millions)<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial Year Orig<strong>in</strong>al Allocation Revised Allocation<br />

2005-06 1200 1499.791<br />

2006-07 2900 2749.24<br />

2007-08 9936 4945.14<br />

2008-09 9100 7257.579<br />

2009-10 6125 6561.790<br />

2010-11 6350.000<br />

Source: Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the allocation at Table above, an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.2719 million is for ongo<strong>in</strong>g programmes i.e.<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities and up-gradation <strong>of</strong> colleges. An amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.660 million is for<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> new colleges. An amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.393 million has been earmarked for University <strong>of</strong><br />

Gujrat and an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.383.760 for support to the Universities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

40<br />

Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Development Programme 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

73


3.4.7: Student Teacher Ratio at Primary, Middle and High Schools<br />

Table 47: Student Teacher Ratio <strong>of</strong> Schools<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

74<br />

Category <strong>of</strong><br />

School<br />

Total<br />

Enrollment<br />

Total<br />

Teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Staff<br />

Student<br />

Teacher<br />

Ratio<br />

(STR)<br />

Male<br />

Enrollment<br />

Male<br />

Teachers<br />

Male<br />

STR<br />

Female<br />

Enrollment<br />

Female<br />

Teachers<br />

1 Mosque<br />

Schools<br />

212000 5039 42 209000 4980 42 3000 59 51<br />

2 Govt.<br />

Primary 4794000 120695 40 2667000 64898 41 2127000 55797 38<br />

Schools<br />

3 Govt.<br />

Middle 2156000 71081 30 1006000 31446 32 1150000 39635 29<br />

Schools<br />

4 Govt. High<br />

3051000 97798 31 1774000 59841 30 1277000<br />

Schools<br />

Source:- <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

37957 34<br />

Female<br />

STR<br />

The Student Teacher Ratio (STR) <strong>in</strong> Mosque schools is 1:42, Government Primary School, 1:40<br />

Government Middle Schools 1:30, Government High Schools 1:31. STR <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> male students <strong>in</strong><br />

Mosque schools is 1:42, Government Primary Schools 1:41, Government Middle Schools 1:32, and<br />

Government High Schools 1:30. STR <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> female students <strong>in</strong> Mosque schools is 1:51,<br />

Government Primary Schools 1:38, Government Middle Schools 1:29, and Government High<br />

Schools 1:34. The enrollment <strong>in</strong> High Schools substantially <strong>in</strong>creases as compared to enrollment <strong>in</strong><br />

Middle Schools. The major reason for this enhancement <strong>in</strong> enrollment is less number <strong>of</strong> private<br />

education <strong>in</strong>stitutions at secondary level. The students graduat<strong>in</strong>g from low costs middle schools<br />

seek admission <strong>in</strong> Government High Schools after pass<strong>in</strong>g PEC Exam<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

3.4.8: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

The secondary school Net Attendance Rate (NAR) is similar for girls (28%) and for boys (30%).<br />

NARs are especially low <strong>in</strong> rural areas (23%), for children aged 10 years (5%), for children <strong>of</strong><br />

mothers with no education (21%) and children <strong>in</strong> the lowest wealth qu<strong>in</strong>tile (8%). Almost two <strong>in</strong><br />

five (43%) <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> secondary school age are <strong>in</strong> primary school and 29 % are out <strong>of</strong> school.<br />

The middle/ secondary NAR is greater for boys than girls. More secondary school-aged rural<br />

children (33%) are out <strong>of</strong> school compared to urban children (17%) and more are attend<strong>in</strong>g primary<br />

school. 57% attend government schools and 43 % attend private schools.<br />

In rural areas, more children attend government school (69%) than private (30%). Mothers with<br />

middle or higher education are more likely to send their children to private schools than those with<br />

primary or no education. As expected, the type <strong>of</strong> school strongly correlates with the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />

The type <strong>of</strong> school also varies markedly by district: more children attend private schools than<br />

government schools <strong>in</strong> Lahore, Gujranwala, Sialkot, Faisalabad, Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di, Sheikhupura and<br />

Gujrat Districts. The gross primary attendance rate, which considers the number <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> all<br />

ages who are attend<strong>in</strong>g primary school as a %age <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> primary school<br />

age (5-9 years). The Gross Attendance Rate (GAR) at the primary level <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> is 97%. The<br />

rates vary by sex, area <strong>of</strong> residence, mother's education, wealth <strong>in</strong>dex, division and district. Boys<br />

have a higher rate (102%) than girls (93%) and urban areas have higher rates (109%) than rural<br />

areas (93%). Thus more boys than girls and more urban children than rural-dwellers (<strong>of</strong> all ages)<br />

attend primary school.<br />

Gross primary attendance rates <strong>in</strong>crease sharply with the wealth <strong>in</strong>dex, from 62% <strong>in</strong> the lowest<br />

qu<strong>in</strong>tile to 113 % <strong>in</strong> the highest. Overall, about half <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> primary school age <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

attend primary or secondary school (53%). Boys have a slightly higher NAR (54%) compared to


girls (52%). In urban areas, 64 % <strong>of</strong> primary school-aged children attend school compared to only<br />

49% <strong>in</strong> rural areas. This disparity is more pronounced for girls (urban 65%; rural 47%) than for<br />

boys (urban 62%; rural 51%). Attendance rates are lowest for children 5 years <strong>of</strong> age at only 19%.<br />

This may be due to the fact that many children enter school at age 6 rather than age 5. School<br />

attendance <strong>in</strong>creases with mothers' education: (higher education 73%; secondary 72%; middle 67%;<br />

primary 65%; no education 46%. (MICS 2007-08, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011). The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions at Secondary and Higher Secondary level sharply decreases <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

schools, teachers and students. At Middle school level number <strong>of</strong> public schools is 7534 whereas at<br />

Secondary level the number <strong>of</strong> schools decreases to 4839 and at Higher Secondary level is further<br />

reduced to 518. In case <strong>of</strong> gender parity, the chasm further widens because the number <strong>of</strong> male<br />

schools at High School level is 1865 whereas it is 1947 <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> females. Similarly at Higher<br />

Secondary level, the number <strong>of</strong> male school is 2974 as compared to 1865 as described <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

above. Similarly <strong>in</strong> Urban Rural terms, the distribution <strong>of</strong> schools is even more <strong>in</strong>equitable. The<br />

needs, target groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2<br />

3.5 : College/Tertiary <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.5.1: <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong> is the capital <strong>in</strong>vestment aimed at produc<strong>in</strong>g knowledge workers for knowledge<br />

societies lead<strong>in</strong>g to knowledge economies. NEP 2009 aims at gett<strong>in</strong>g maximum number <strong>of</strong> students<br />

enrolled <strong>in</strong> colleges and universities. Highly qualifies human resource through higher education<br />

trampol<strong>in</strong>e economic growth and development. The Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department (HED) has<br />

identified governance as one <strong>of</strong> the major debilitated factor. The post<strong>in</strong>g and transfer <strong>of</strong> the college<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g and non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff is made on the political pressure and ultimately the worst sufferers<br />

are the students, teachers and communities. At times, a pr<strong>of</strong>essional with a specialization <strong>in</strong> a<br />

particular subject is posted <strong>in</strong> a college where no student has taken up that subject. Contrary to this,<br />

there are colleges with students <strong>in</strong> that particular subject and the pr<strong>of</strong>essor has got himself<br />

transferred to a place <strong>of</strong> his/her own choice.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial recruitment <strong>of</strong> Lecturers <strong>in</strong> colleges is made on the basis <strong>of</strong> demand from a particular<br />

place but after appo<strong>in</strong>tment, the <strong>in</strong>cumbents use political <strong>in</strong>fluence to get transferred to their<br />

favorite dest<strong>in</strong>ations. There is no scientific mechanism for monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department. School <strong>Education</strong> Department has a specialized agency PMIU under the umbrella <strong>of</strong><br />

PESRP and field presence <strong>in</strong> the shape <strong>of</strong> District Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Officers (DMOs). DMOs are<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uously monitor<strong>in</strong>g School <strong>Education</strong> Department <strong>Education</strong>al Institutions. Based on the<br />

compensat<strong>in</strong>g feedback <strong>of</strong> DMOs, formative monitor<strong>in</strong>g is possible. Formative monitor<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

DMOs helps to re<strong>in</strong>force, balance and enrich the process cont<strong>in</strong>uously. In case <strong>of</strong> HED, this<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention is miss<strong>in</strong>g. Without monitor<strong>in</strong>g, it is exceed<strong>in</strong>gly difficult to conduct performance<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the teach<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. The exam<strong>in</strong>ation body for <strong>in</strong>termediate colleges is the<br />

respective Board <strong>of</strong> Intermediate and Secondary <strong>Education</strong>, under the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative control <strong>of</strong><br />

HED. It is comparatively easier for HED authorities to access the data and result <strong>of</strong> the students<br />

appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ation at <strong>in</strong>termediate level whereas the exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> degree colleges and<br />

post-graduate colleges is conducted by different Universities. The Universities are f<strong>in</strong>anced by the<br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong> Commission (HEC) and are autonomous.<br />

3.5.2: Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Due to <strong>in</strong>stitutional gap and symmetrical <strong>in</strong>formation flow, HED is debilitated to have easy access<br />

and control on the data with different Universities. HED does not have College Management<br />

Information System (CMIS) <strong>in</strong> place whereas other departments have their own Management<br />

Information System (MIS). MIS <strong>in</strong> different department makes it easier to make <strong>in</strong>formed decision<br />

75


mak<strong>in</strong>g and carryout performance evaluation. <strong>Punjab</strong> has a separate Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

(HED) headed by a Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Secretary to the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>. The follow<strong>in</strong>g Tables<br />

above <strong>in</strong>dicate enrollment (male and female), staff strength, development and non-development<br />

expenditure.<br />

Table 48:-Enrolment <strong>in</strong> Arts & Science Intermediate, Degree Colleges and Higher Secondary<br />

Schools by Study Group and Sex<br />

Study Group<br />

2008-09 2009-10<br />

Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls<br />

Total 777103 341647 435456 806227 350032 456195<br />

i) Intermediate Classes 545216 262392 282824 598273 281270 317003<br />

a) Pre-Medical 72178 26104 46074 81264 26389 54875<br />

b) Pre-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g 81210 64437 16773 94780 74071 20709<br />

c) Computer Science 54205 26752 27453 60716 30859 29857<br />

d) Humanities 275771 100515 175256 294379 102986 191393<br />

e) Commerce, Home 61852 44584 17268 67134 46965 20169<br />

Economics/Others<br />

ii) Degree Classes 208459 71004 137455 189854 63133 126721<br />

a) B.Sc. 35269 12823 22446 35226 13603 21623<br />

b) B.A 131834 29926 101908 119657 24905 94752<br />

c) BSc 4558 2197 2361 3243 1718 1525<br />

d) B.Com 33345 24165 9180 30857 22521 8336<br />

e) Others 3453 1893 1560 871 386 485<br />

iii) Degree Classes 23428 8251 15177 18100 5629 12471<br />

a) M.Sc. 8360 3586 4774 5560 2164 3396<br />

b) M.A 15068 4665 10403 12425 3384 9041<br />

c) M.com 0 0 0 115 81 34<br />

Source: <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2010-11, <strong>Punjab</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics Lahore<br />

Table 49:-Post - Graduate Enrolment <strong>in</strong> Affiliated Colleges<br />

Year Total <strong>Punjab</strong> University Multan University Bahawalpur University<br />

2000-01 10945 8063 2130 752<br />

2001-02 11446 8622 2064 760<br />

2002-03 12182 9158 2325 699<br />

2003-04 14673 11393 2540 740<br />

2004-05 17150 13440 2910 800<br />

2005-06 13361 8461 3596 1304<br />

2006-07 20561 14875 4123 1563<br />

2007-08 24742 18779 4311 1652<br />

2008-09 23428 17695 4047 1686<br />

2009-10 17501 10419 4245 2837<br />

Source:- <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

76


Table 50:- Arts and Science Colleges for Boys and Girls, Enrolment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Year<br />

Number Enrolment(‘000`) Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Male Female<br />

Inter & Degree Colleges<br />

2000-01 510 269 241 437 205 232 15817 9260 6557<br />

2001-02 514 267 247 462 219 243 15168 8726 6442<br />

2002-03 531 271 260 492 234 258 16248 9258 6990<br />

2003-04 585 299 286 548 258 290 17371 9693 7678<br />

2004-05 618 332 286 600 274 326 18421 10081 8340<br />

2005-06 672 339 333 619 273 346 19131 10677 8454<br />

2006-07 694 354 340 651 285 366 20049 11332 8717<br />

2007-08 744 379 365 675 306 369 20255 11448 8807<br />

2008-09 839 447 392 704 335 369 22454 12979 9475<br />

2009-10 901 460 441 724 339 385 23096 12623 10473<br />

Table 51:-Arts & Science Colleges for Boys & Girls, Enrolment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Year<br />

Number Enrolment(‘000`) Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Male Female<br />

Inter Colleges<br />

2000-01 149 90 59 29 16 13 2253 1573 680<br />

2001-02 149 89 60 31 18 13 2140 1497 643<br />

2002-03 156 92 64 32 19 13 2482 1740 742<br />

2003-04 181 104 77 34 20 14 2934 1909 1025<br />

2004-05 202 110 92 38 20 18 3207 1961 1246<br />

2005-06 203 113 90 40 22 18 3419 2181 1238<br />

2006-07 204 114 90 44 24 20 3591 2213 1378<br />

2007-08 177 94 83 34 18 16 3460 2062 1398<br />

2008-09 214 123 91 41 24 17 3948 2369 1579<br />

2009-10 226 120 106 52 29 23 4007 2316 1691<br />

Degree Colleges<br />

2000-01 361 179 182 408 188 220 13564 7687 5877<br />

2001-02 365 178 187 431 201 230 13028 7229 5799<br />

2002-03 375 179 196 460 216 244 13766 7518 6248<br />

2003-04 404 195 209 514 238 276 14437 7784 6653<br />

2004-05 455 222 233 562 255 307 15214 8120 7094<br />

2005-06 469 226 243 579 251 328 15712 8496 7216<br />

2006-07 490 240 250 607 261 346 16458 9119 7339<br />

2007-08 567 285 282 641 288 353 16795 9386 7409<br />

2008-09 625 324 301 663 312 351 18506 10610 7896<br />

2009-10 675 340 335 672 310 362 19089 10307 8782<br />

Source:- <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

77


Table 52:-Number <strong>of</strong> Higher Secondary Schools for Boys & Girls, Enrolment and Teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Staff<br />

Year<br />

Number<br />

Enrolment (‘000`)<br />

Teach<strong>in</strong>g Staff<br />

I-X Classes<br />

XI-XII Classes<br />

Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Male Female<br />

2000-01 378 210 168 245 121 124 37 17 20 4505 2880 1625<br />

2001-02 380 212 168 259 130 129 40 20 20 4279 2702 1577<br />

2002-03 387 217 170 262 126 136 46 23 23 4222 2660 1562<br />

2003-04 427 237 190 295 147 148 51 26 25 4630 2875 1755<br />

2004-05 487 262 225 322 154 168 58 28 30 5277 3034 2243<br />

2005-06 491 262 229 393 187 206 60 29 31 4959 2901 2058<br />

2006-07 523 273 250 420 196 224 68 32 36 4863 2827 2036<br />

2007-08 558 289 269 365 177 188 71 35 36 5511 3156 2355<br />

2008-09 587 288 299 373 178 195 73 34 39 6122 3149 2973<br />

2009-10 636 300 336 385 185 200 82 38 44 6588 3369 3219<br />

Source: - <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>,<br />

Table 53: Development & Non-Development Budget <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

Year<br />

Non<br />

Development<br />

Budget<br />

Development<br />

Budget Rs <strong>in</strong><br />

Million<br />

Total Rs <strong>in</strong><br />

Million<br />

Revised<br />

Development<br />

Budget<br />

Utilization<br />

Utilization<br />

Development<br />

2006-07 13678.498 2900.00 16578.498 2749.007 15134.51 91.26%<br />

2007-08 7332.479 9936.00 17268.479 4945.140 16771.14 97.12%<br />

2008.09 13678.498 9100.00 22778.498 6269.977 22095.14 97.00%<br />

2009-10 7869.782 6125 13994.782 13994.782 13434.99 96.00%<br />

Source: Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department, Govt. <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> 2009-10<br />

Figure-6: Development & Non-Development Budget <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

78


3.5.3: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

The Higher <strong>Education</strong> is capital <strong>in</strong>vestment. In terms <strong>of</strong> access there are issues <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

<strong>in</strong>adequacies <strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termediate, degree and post-graduate colleges. In terms <strong>of</strong> new<br />

colleges <strong>in</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and up-gradation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g colleges from <strong>in</strong>termediate to<br />

degree and degree to post-graduate level, there are f<strong>in</strong>ancial constra<strong>in</strong>ts. In addition to low<br />

budgetary support, there are issues <strong>of</strong> location for the establishment <strong>of</strong> new colleges, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

political economy <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce has their own choices whereas it may not necessarily co<strong>in</strong>cide<br />

with the actual need <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>in</strong> the area. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the past, so many <strong>in</strong>termediate colleges were<br />

opened on political recommendations and as a consequence are not function<strong>in</strong>g at all. The fact<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s that there are certa<strong>in</strong> areas where access to college education is the dire need but it has been<br />

denied due to political reasons. Constant up-gradation <strong>of</strong> curricula is the basic <strong>in</strong>gredient to ensure<br />

quality education. HED does not have <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangement for curriculum development at<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial level. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact HEC also is not well equipped with the specialty to up-grade<br />

curriculum, impact<strong>in</strong>g the quality <strong>of</strong> textbooks and other publications on a particular subject. HED<br />

does not have <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangement for cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> the faculty. In<br />

case <strong>of</strong> SED, there are dedicated <strong>in</strong>stitutions like Directorate <strong>of</strong> Staff Development, Government<br />

Colleges for Elementary Teach<strong>in</strong>g and University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> whereas HED does not have a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle pr<strong>of</strong>essional development facility for the capacity enhancement <strong>of</strong> faculty engaged.<br />

Consequently the workforce engaged by HED is unable to access the latest developments <strong>in</strong> a<br />

particular field <strong>of</strong> knowledge. This securely impacts the knowledge dissem<strong>in</strong>ation by the respective<br />

faculty to the students. Faculty is the s<strong>in</strong>gle most important variable for quality education s<strong>in</strong>ce it is<br />

the axle <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction between mentor and mentee, on which the quality turns. HED has issues with<br />

the exam<strong>in</strong>ation system s<strong>in</strong>ce it is based on memory <strong>of</strong> the students <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> secure understand<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

There is an issue <strong>of</strong> applied knowledge with the graduates s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>formation memorized by them<br />

cannot be applied <strong>in</strong> actual practical theatrics. HED has also recognition and equivalency issues. To<br />

accommodate this short com<strong>in</strong>g, HED <strong>in</strong>troduced baccalaureate degree for 4 years after<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate on the pattern <strong>of</strong> premier <strong>in</strong>stitutions around the globe. The <strong>in</strong>itiative was politically<br />

thwarted by the vested <strong>in</strong>terests and the programme delayed by few years. After a lot <strong>of</strong> efforts by<br />

the present regime, the system has been put <strong>in</strong> place but the issue <strong>of</strong> qualified, satisfied and<br />

competent faculty rema<strong>in</strong>s there s<strong>in</strong>ce quality will rema<strong>in</strong> a far-cry without reflective and reflexive<br />

practioners. By now baccalaureate degree programme has been <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 26 Public Sector<br />

Colleges. HED has developed performance evaluation criteria for the promotion <strong>of</strong> Lecturers,<br />

Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essors, Associates Pr<strong>of</strong>essors, Pr<strong>of</strong>essors and Pr<strong>in</strong>cipals. The criteria developed by<br />

HED will help to promote the right people for the right slots and reta<strong>in</strong> the knowledge workforce<br />

only on the basis <strong>of</strong> competence and the delivery. HED has also <strong>in</strong>troduced bonus system as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>centive for the teach<strong>in</strong>g staff. At the same time academic accountability will be ensured through<br />

performance evaluation criteria. HED has plans to <strong>in</strong>troduce one-w<strong>in</strong>dow operation to address the<br />

demands <strong>of</strong> the teach<strong>in</strong>g and non-teach<strong>in</strong>g staff. A plan is be<strong>in</strong>g conceived for sett<strong>in</strong>g up a center <strong>of</strong><br />

excellence for the cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> the teach<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> HED. The needs,<br />

target groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2<br />

3.6 Technical & Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.6.1: <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Like all other sectors <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> Pakistan, Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong> (TVE) also<br />

suffers from issues <strong>of</strong> access as well as quality. While theoretically it caters to the market needs,<br />

practically it meets a very small portion <strong>of</strong> the demand. In most countries, the relative share <strong>of</strong> the<br />

applied segment <strong>of</strong> the tertiary sector is higher than 18.5% <strong>in</strong> Pakistan. Hence, the base <strong>of</strong> technical<br />

and vocational skills provided to the economy <strong>in</strong> Pakistan is narrow. The <strong>in</strong>adequate quality stems<br />

from both a smaller number <strong>of</strong> total years <strong>of</strong> preparation and limitations <strong>of</strong> the curriculum,<br />

compared to the more advanced systems as well as the issue <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>in</strong>structors.<br />

79


The parts <strong>of</strong> pre-<strong>in</strong>dependence India which became part <strong>of</strong> Pakistan had a very low <strong>in</strong>dustrial base,<br />

<strong>in</strong>herit<strong>in</strong>g only 4% <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>in</strong>dustrial sector. Pakistan progressed rapidly <strong>in</strong> the 50s from this<br />

low base that cont<strong>in</strong>ued to early 60s. To meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> a grow<strong>in</strong>g manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector,<br />

technical and vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g systems were expanded and strengthened. However, after the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial success subsequent <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the sector failed to keep pace with the changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />

market requirements. On the demand side, jobs <strong>in</strong> the public sector cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be a priority. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> these jobs did not require specialized skills and even a general matriculation certificate with no<br />

technical or vocational content was deemed satisfactory to fill the junior level adm<strong>in</strong>istrative and<br />

service jobs. The academic degrees <strong>of</strong> Bachelors <strong>of</strong> Arts and Masters <strong>of</strong> Arts were sufficient to fill<br />

the requirements for higher level jobs. This tradition has largely been ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

Independence, even though the economic structure <strong>of</strong> the country has changed significantly. The<br />

demand-pull effects have had limited effect on educational provision. On the supply side, the<br />

certificate and diploma programmes do not seem to have a progression ladder <strong>in</strong>to higher level<br />

skills. They do not provide entry claims <strong>in</strong>to the tertiary sector with credit recognition <strong>in</strong> both the<br />

academic and applied streams.<br />

In addition to this blocked forward l<strong>in</strong>kage, the back ward l<strong>in</strong>kage with apprentice tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

traditional sector is miss<strong>in</strong>g. There is no provision where by the traditional apprenticeship<br />

experience <strong>in</strong> the non-formal sector could be assessed and certified for entry <strong>in</strong>to the formal sector<br />

<strong>of</strong> vocational education. The current TVE certificate stream is too narrow <strong>in</strong> its scope and does not<br />

cover the large variety <strong>of</strong> skill stra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that takes place <strong>in</strong> the traditional sector. Two way crossover<br />

between the academic and the applied/ pr<strong>of</strong>essional streams is lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the system. The<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> a well-articulated qualifications system is a major structural short com<strong>in</strong>g. The problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> a fragmented structure <strong>of</strong> governance, endemic to the education sector, also plagues the technical<br />

and vocational sub-sector. Many <strong>in</strong>stitutions and jurisdictions are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> this<br />

field without a clear demarcation <strong>of</strong> their respective responsibilities. There is no focal po<strong>in</strong>t for<br />

coherent plann<strong>in</strong>g for the sector. At the same time, the voices <strong>of</strong> important stakeholders such as the<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess sector are not adequately taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g the content, structures and<br />

certification <strong>of</strong> study programmes. The TVE sector does not benefit from good collaboration and<br />

<strong>in</strong>put from the bus<strong>in</strong>ess sector, such as for updat<strong>in</strong>g its equipment and teach<strong>in</strong>g materials.<br />

Resultantly, there are perennial compla<strong>in</strong>ts from employers about the substandard quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

skills available <strong>in</strong> the market. The <strong>Policy</strong> recognizes the high importance <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g a broadbased<br />

and high quality sector for provid<strong>in</strong>g technical skills.<br />

3.6.2: Current Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

As the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and services sectors have expanded, skill requirements <strong>of</strong> the country have<br />

changed as well, and there are needs for technical and vocational skills even <strong>in</strong> the traditional<br />

sector as it adopts more productive techniques <strong>of</strong> production. The technical <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong><br />

production processes will <strong>in</strong>crease as new technologies become more pervasive, thereby rais<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

demand for TVE skills <strong>of</strong> a higher quality. In a global environment that permits easy flow <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments and people the TVE sector <strong>in</strong> Pakistan needs to have a forward look<strong>in</strong>g supply strategy<br />

<strong>of</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g a sophisticated skill base. Pakistan, as already stated, has a comparative advantage <strong>in</strong><br />

the labor market due to its population size. Unfortunately it has so far failed to optimally benefit<br />

from this endowment. In comparison, India has developed a wider and more qualified skill base to<br />

the po<strong>in</strong>t that it can export high value added services. The forecasted demographic transition over<br />

the next few years shows the young population <strong>of</strong> 15-24 years to grow and peak <strong>in</strong> 2015. The<br />

current global talent deficit is expected to expand rapidly and Pakistan needs to be well poised to<br />

benefit from this expand<strong>in</strong>g demand. This is an opportunity for the TVE to substantively contribute<br />

to the country’s growth potential. As far as Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is concerned various experiments <strong>in</strong><br />

the country have not succeeded and most reform proposals <strong>in</strong>vite controversy. A major deficit has<br />

been an absence <strong>of</strong> focused research <strong>in</strong>to the causes <strong>of</strong> this failure and potential remedies. The major<br />

80


challenges are:<br />

• Schools did not have enough budgets to meet the equipment requirements for susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

• Adequately skilled teachers for these programmes are not available. The curricula assume<br />

prototypes that do not cater to differential s<strong>in</strong> market requirements across districts or other<br />

geographic divides like rural-urban, etc.<br />

• The <strong>Policy</strong> addresses three pr<strong>in</strong>cipal problems faced by the sector: (i) its weak l<strong>in</strong>kages<br />

with other education sectors and the labor market, (ii) deficiencies <strong>in</strong> the governance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sector; and (iii) the need to expand supply <strong>of</strong> technical skills <strong>of</strong> good quality.<br />

• In puts <strong>of</strong> all stakeholders like Industrial/ Agricultural/ Service Sectors & Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Community etc. shall be <strong>in</strong>stitutionalized to ensure their <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> all current and future<br />

reforms <strong>of</strong> TVE to enable the sector to meet market needs.<br />

• Skills Standards and Curriculum should be developed and standardized at National Level.<br />

• The TVE curriculum shall be developed <strong>in</strong> standardized modules for each trade to elim<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

differentials across various tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions to provide opportunities to the tra<strong>in</strong>ees for<br />

horizontal/upward mobility and also help <strong>in</strong> assessment and certification <strong>of</strong> apprentices <strong>in</strong><br />

non-formal sectors for their entry <strong>in</strong>to formal vocational/technical sectors.<br />

• TVE shall be extended accord<strong>in</strong>g to the need <strong>of</strong> the area i.e. Tehsil, District and Division.<br />

• Skills-based vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g courses, relevant to local labor market, shall be <strong>of</strong>fered to<br />

the graduates <strong>of</strong> literacy programmes by the National <strong>Education</strong> Foundation,<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial/area literacy department/ directorate and relevant NGOs.<br />

• Level-wise pre-requisites for entry as a teacher <strong>in</strong> TVE shall be def<strong>in</strong>ed and Teacher<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development shall be focused as an ongo<strong>in</strong>g process.<br />

• Terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> service for TVE teachers shall be compatible with market demand<br />

<strong>of</strong> their services and skills.<br />

• Local conditions and requirements must be considered while mak<strong>in</strong>g any recommendation<br />

for replication <strong>of</strong> TVE model, implemented <strong>in</strong> other countries.<br />

• A study to evaluate failures <strong>of</strong> vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervention at school level shall be<br />

commissioned to make more realistic recommendations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cost requirements, for<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g it part <strong>of</strong> general education up to Secondary School Level.<br />

• Technical & vocational education <strong>in</strong>stitutions shall particularly focus on agro-based<br />

vocational skills to deal with both agriculture and live stock.<br />

• Curricula for vocational education shall allow flexibility for adaptation as per requirements<br />

<strong>of</strong> local market <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g absorption <strong>of</strong> future changes <strong>in</strong> the market.<br />

• Technical education <strong>in</strong>stitutions, if start <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g degree programme, shall also seek<br />

clearance from Pakistan Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Council before launch<strong>in</strong>g such programme.<br />

• Governments shall take practical measures to remove social taboos attached to TVE and<br />

promote dignity <strong>of</strong> work <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with teach<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Islam.<br />

81


Box-9 Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

Pakistan is a signatory <strong>of</strong> Asia Pacific Accreditation and Certification Council (APACC). However, we have not<br />

yet fully capitalized on the value that it br<strong>in</strong>gs. There is even little awareness about its utility. TEVTA has a huge<br />

challenge <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> expansion <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure with focus on core issues <strong>of</strong> Curriculum Reform, Human Resource<br />

Development, Curriculum Compla<strong>in</strong>t Lab Structure, Evaluation Excellence, International Recognition/Equivalence<br />

and Placement Facilitation. TEVTA has to meet the <strong>in</strong>ternational standards <strong>of</strong> collaboration and accreditation <strong>in</strong><br />

order to design and development certification system. TEVTA has a challenge to design specific policies, criterion,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators, <strong>in</strong>structions and formats for accreditation, certification activities <strong>of</strong> TEVTA and develop model<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutes by implement<strong>in</strong>g the methodologies <strong>of</strong> accreditation & certification activities. TEVTA has to develop<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional certification and licens<strong>in</strong>g for accreditation & certification <strong>of</strong> TEVTA and Non-TEVTA <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

and develop and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the standardized operational quality management system for self-evaluation and<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ual improvement <strong>in</strong> TEVTA. TEVTA has to assume assur<strong>in</strong>g credibility and value <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs<br />

for credit transfer facility at National and International levels. TEVTA has to devise system for l<strong>in</strong>kages with local<br />

and <strong>in</strong>ternational employment sector as export oriented outfits for workforce mobility. TEVTA is <strong>in</strong> the process <strong>of</strong><br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g a standardized system for accreditation and certification <strong>of</strong> Private/Non-TEVTA <strong>in</strong>stitutions for<br />

accreditation with TEVTA to team up and synergize for maximum efficiency.<br />

TEVTA has collaborated with qualifications and curriculum authority (QCA) UK through city and<br />

Guilds/UK Universities, Technical and further education (TAFE), Jonkop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational school <strong>of</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess (JIBS) Sweden, <strong>UNESCO</strong>, UNIDO, OPEC (OFID), GIZ, Turkish M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> National<br />

<strong>Education</strong> TEGV, ISMEK, ILO and USAID. The <strong>in</strong>ternational collaboration has helped TEVTA to<br />

improve its standards gradually but there is a need for cont<strong>in</strong>uous improvement. TEVTA has<br />

entered <strong>in</strong>to partnership with NGOs, School <strong>Education</strong> Department, Technical and Vocational<br />

Centers <strong>in</strong> both Public and Private Sector. The objective is to provide maximum opportunity to tra<strong>in</strong><br />

workforce utiliz<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial setup for practical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and the employers bear the<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and stipend for apprentices. TEVTA has common concern for coord<strong>in</strong>ation for<br />

national qualification framework development, coord<strong>in</strong>ation for develop<strong>in</strong>g a national skill strategy,<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ation for develop<strong>in</strong>g consensus for curricula development for DAE courses and shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

resources – national and <strong>in</strong>ternational.<br />

3.6.3: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

After the 18 th Amendment the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Technical <strong>Education</strong>, is<br />

now a prov<strong>in</strong>cial subject. Pakistan is suffer<strong>in</strong>g from both skills shortage and skills gap. The total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> persons enrolled <strong>in</strong> Technical and Vocation Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institutes is only 1.3% <strong>of</strong> about<br />

300000/- people <strong>in</strong> the age cohort <strong>of</strong> 14-19. The percentage is dangerously low when compared<br />

with numbers <strong>of</strong> 35-60% for OECD Countries and 6-20% for the Asia Pacific Economies. There is<br />

a major mismatch between desired and actual quality levels and relevance. Pakistan’s growth and<br />

development is limited by lack <strong>of</strong> competence <strong>in</strong> both hard and s<strong>of</strong>t skills. The nature <strong>of</strong> work and<br />

demands for skills is chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Pakistan and employment opportunities are shift<strong>in</strong>g across<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries and occupations. The pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Pakistani workforce <strong>in</strong> 2008 shows share <strong>of</strong><br />

employment <strong>in</strong> Agriculture 43%, services 36% and <strong>in</strong>dustry 20%. National survey also <strong>in</strong>dicate that<br />

over 8 million workers have moved away from Agriculture <strong>in</strong>to services and <strong>in</strong>dustry s<strong>in</strong>ce 1995,<br />

with the service sector observ<strong>in</strong>g nearly 55% <strong>of</strong> such persons. This has to be seen <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> a<br />

steady migration from Rural to Urban areas.<br />

The grave mismatch between demand and quality skills is clear from labor survey over the period<br />

which <strong>in</strong>dicates that 59.2% <strong>of</strong> the unemployed are literate or semi-literate. 33.6% <strong>of</strong> the labor force<br />

possesses less than 1 year <strong>of</strong> education while 70% has less than 8 years <strong>of</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g 41 . The subject<br />

<strong>of</strong> technical and vocational education is be<strong>in</strong>g dealt by two organizations <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> i.e. Technical<br />

41<br />

TEVTA Annual Report 2010-2011<br />

82


and Vocation <strong>Education</strong> Authority (TEVTA) and <strong>Punjab</strong> Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Council (PVTC).<br />

TEVTA was formed through an Ord<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong> 1999 which has now become an Act <strong>of</strong> Legislature,<br />

‘TEVTA Act 2010’. TEVTA is responsible for apprenticeship programme implementation under<br />

Apprenticeship Ord<strong>in</strong>ance. TEVTA is also responsible for national level coord<strong>in</strong>ation with all<br />

Governments and Private Sector Stakeholders. It’s a regulatory body for private sector <strong>in</strong>stitution <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> and is controll<strong>in</strong>g body <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Technical <strong>Education</strong> and Trade Test<strong>in</strong>g Board<br />

Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Bodies that affiliate Technical and Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institutions. TEVTA works<br />

outside the P&D and F<strong>in</strong>ance Department procedures <strong>in</strong> Development Plann<strong>in</strong>g. A s<strong>in</strong>gle l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

development grant is allocated to TEVTA from the ADP and flexibility to work outside the normal<br />

Government bus<strong>in</strong>ess process is allowed s<strong>in</strong>ce Government procedures are at times cumbersome<br />

and cause delay <strong>in</strong> implementation. The needs, target groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong><br />

the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2<br />

Figure-7: Expenditure by Level <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Challenge 42<br />

EXPENDITURE BY LEVEL OF EDUCATION<br />

% Distribution<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2001-02<br />

2002-03<br />

2003-04<br />

2004-05<br />

2005-06<br />

Primary<br />

Secondary<br />

Gen. Univ<br />

Colleges<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> / Tech.<br />

Univ.<br />

Teacher and<br />

Tech. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Other Edu<br />

Institutions<br />

1<br />

42<br />

Khan, S.H.(2007) F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g Higher <strong>Education</strong>: A view from the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission. Conference on Higher<br />

<strong>Education</strong>, GCU, Lahore<br />

83


Figure-8: Number Game and Drop-Out Challenge<br />

NUMBER GAME AND DROP-OUT CHALLENGE<br />

18<br />

9<br />

16<br />

The Dropouts<br />

8<br />

Enrollment, m<br />

Enrollment, Million, 2007<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

Dropouts (m)<br />

Dropout Factor<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

Dropout Ratio<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

primary middle high Tech/Voc<br />

Category<br />

16<br />

Figure-9: Position <strong>of</strong> Pakistan <strong>in</strong> the Comity <strong>of</strong> Nations 43<br />

Position <strong>of</strong> Pakistan <strong>in</strong> the Comity <strong>of</strong> Nations<br />

Percentage Enrolled<br />

( 11-17 or 12-17 age)<br />

45.0<br />

40.0<br />

35.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

Australia<br />

41.3<br />

Fig 3. TVE <strong>in</strong> Some countries<br />

32.5<br />

30.3<br />

28.0<br />

19.4<br />

20.6<br />

12.8 12.7 15.5 8.3 5.9<br />

3.0<br />

1.3 1.6<br />

Switzerland<br />

Sweden<br />

France<br />

S. Korea<br />

Japan<br />

Thailand<br />

Iran<br />

Malaysia<br />

Country<br />

Brazil<br />

Pakistan<br />

Bangladesh<br />

Egypt<br />

Turkey<br />

17<br />

43<br />

Khan, S.H.(2007) F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g Higher <strong>Education</strong>: A view from the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission. Conference on Higher<br />

<strong>Education</strong>, GCU, Lahore<br />

84


Table 54: TEVTA Institutions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

TEVTA Institutions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Technical <strong>Education</strong> (29)<br />

• Govt. Colleges <strong>of</strong> Technology 07 (07 M)<br />

• Govt. Polytechnics Institutes 22 (17 M + 05 F)<br />

Commerce <strong>Education</strong> (118)<br />

• Colleges <strong>of</strong> Commerce 38<br />

• Institutes <strong>of</strong> Commerce 80 (67 M + 13 F)<br />

Technical <strong>Education</strong> (29)<br />

• Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 314<br />

• Commerce <strong>Education</strong> 118<br />

• Service Centers/Specialized Institutions 17<br />

• Teachers Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institutes 3<br />

• TOTAL 481<br />

Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (314)<br />

• Technical Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 42 (37 M + 05F)<br />

• Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institutes (Women) 118 (F)<br />

• Technical Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Centers 133 (106 M + 27F)<br />

• Agriculture Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Schools 07<br />

• Apprenticeship Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Centers 05<br />

• Readymade Garments tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Centers 09<br />

Service Centers/Specialized Institutions 17<br />

Teachers Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institutes 03<br />

Table 55: Enrolment <strong>in</strong> Technical Institutions<br />

Sector No. <strong>of</strong> Institutions Enrollment 2009<br />

Technical <strong>Education</strong> 29 38,505<br />

Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 314 27,928<br />

Commerce <strong>Education</strong> 118 45,586<br />

Total 481 112,019<br />

3.7: <strong>Punjab</strong> Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Council (PVTC)<br />

PVTC is another premier <strong>in</strong>stitution along with TEVTA <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. The major source <strong>of</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

PVTC is Zakat. Zakat money is be<strong>in</strong>g as a tool for acquisition <strong>of</strong> skills and economic<br />

empowerment. PVTC has pioneered, way to channel Muslim Charity (Zakat) funds to support an<br />

effective model <strong>of</strong> vocational technical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to a survey carried out by <strong>Education</strong> &<br />

Employment Alliance (EEA), United States Agency International Development (USAID) and<br />

International Youth Foundation (IYF), carried out recently, PVTC has done remarkable job <strong>of</strong><br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g access to tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and employment for young men and woman who lacked the f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

resources to receive vocational technical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. PVTC is do<strong>in</strong>g public service to br<strong>in</strong>g deprived<br />

85


segments <strong>of</strong> the society <strong>in</strong>to ma<strong>in</strong> stream. Focus is on backward areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>, poverty alleviation<br />

<strong>in</strong> real sense and creat<strong>in</strong>g jobs and bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities. PVTC use technology to scale up the<br />

current capacity with focus on generat<strong>in</strong>g employable and exportable manpower by creat<strong>in</strong>g value<br />

for the Youth. To cement PVTC as a lead<strong>in</strong>g organization and gett<strong>in</strong>g the PVTC brand recognized<br />

nationally and <strong>in</strong>ternationally provides pr<strong>of</strong>essional vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to all the needy youth<br />

wherever they are <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. PVTC aims to achieve the aim by exceed<strong>in</strong>g expectations <strong>of</strong> students<br />

and parents, reward<strong>in</strong>g employees and provid<strong>in</strong>g suitable opportunities for all the tra<strong>in</strong>ees and start<br />

earn<strong>in</strong>g a reasonable livelihood. The values <strong>of</strong> PVTC are that their personnel should be <strong>in</strong>spired by<br />

the corporate values, ethics and sense <strong>of</strong> mission and this should be reflected <strong>in</strong> their relationship<br />

with students and work<strong>in</strong>g style pr<strong>of</strong>essional performance belong<strong>in</strong>g team work trust.<br />

Table 56: Econometrics <strong>of</strong> PVTC<br />

Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institutes (VTIs) 182<br />

Staff & Teachers Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institute (STTI) 1<br />

Students enrolled 10 – 11<br />

For 2011 - 2012<br />

Zakat allocation<br />

67,647<br />

Female and Male Ratio 2 : 3 (F:M)<br />

Rs. 678 million<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> employees 2,593<br />

Source: PVTC 2010-11<br />

Zakat for Skills Development Unique Model <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

• Total Zakat funds received s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>ception (1998–2010) are Rs. 4,443.4 million<br />

• PVTC received Rs. 613.4 million dur<strong>in</strong>g 2009-2010 <strong>of</strong> Zakat funds<br />

Table 57: PVTC Facilitation<br />

Free Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Free books / manuals Free uniforms Lab Equipment<br />

Consumables Rs. 500 monthly stipend Rs. 5,000 as tool grant<br />

money<br />

OJT and Job placements<br />

assistance<br />

Source: PVTC 2010-11<br />

Table 58: Capitalization Value <strong>of</strong> VTIs<br />

Particulars (1998 – 2010) Rs. In Billion<br />

Pass-out 134,112<br />

Employed (63%) 84,491<br />

Earn<strong>in</strong>gs @ 5000 / Month 17.76<br />

Earn<strong>in</strong>gs @ 7000 / Month 24.87<br />

Earn<strong>in</strong>gs @ 9000 / Month 31.96<br />

Nos. <strong>of</strong> Families rescued from Poverty trap 77,082<br />

Improvement <strong>in</strong> Quality <strong>of</strong> Life <strong>of</strong> 501,033<br />

(average family size = 6.5 persons)<br />

Population<br />

Source: PVTC 2009-10<br />

86


Table 59: Role and Responsibilities<br />

Fram<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

Policies<br />

Statistics &<br />

Database<br />

Curriculum &<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

Students<br />

Research<br />

Activities<br />

Job Placement &<br />

Skills Development<br />

Direction for<br />

fix<strong>in</strong>g priorities<br />

Custodian <strong>of</strong><br />

ALL exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data and<br />

research<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>e guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

for standards<br />

Govt. & Donor<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

District mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

market demands<br />

Job placement agency<br />

Key Performance<br />

Indices<br />

Advisory body on<br />

Skill Dev. for<br />

Government <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Liaison with<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

agencies<br />

Databank for<br />

TEVT<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

Databank for<br />

graduat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

students<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Market Demand<br />

and Trends<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uous update<br />

<strong>of</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong><br />

market driven<br />

trades<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> master<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ers<br />

Student<br />

scholarships /<br />

loans<br />

Arrang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Institutes Capex<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

leas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Matchmak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry /<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutes<br />

Market demand<br />

driven needs<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g need<br />

assessments<br />

OJTs / Apprenticeship<br />

Export <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

manpower<br />

Entrepreneurship<br />

program<br />

Source: PVTC 2009-10<br />

Table 60: Population Time Bomb<br />

1961 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2050<br />

Population 39.44 155.8 173.4 192.2 211.3 229.3 246.2 313.8<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 21.9 86.6 96.4 106.9 117.6 127.6 136.9 174.6<br />

15-29 years 6.35 25.98 29.33 31.93 33.71 35.45 38.07 48.60<br />

Below Poverty 2.09 8.57 9.67 10.55 11.12 11.69 12.56 16.03<br />

Source: PVTC 2009-10<br />

3.7.1: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

With all its resources and <strong>in</strong>frastructure Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> only tra<strong>in</strong>s 100,000 youth and there<br />

is too much focus on exist<strong>in</strong>g entities is not likely to change this scenario and there is an urgent<br />

need to divert focus towards unaddressed problem. Given the potential demand, why is private<br />

sector not com<strong>in</strong>g forward is the major question. Government must encourage <strong>in</strong>dustries and large<br />

corporations to establish <strong>in</strong>stitutions on jo<strong>in</strong>t venture basis to meet their skilled manpower<br />

requirements. Jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures should be made by PVTC with chambers and trade bodies for targeted<br />

group <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>ees. New curricula have been design and <strong>in</strong>troduced by PVTC <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g, Computer<br />

Application & Office Pr<strong>of</strong>essional, Computer Hardware/ Networks Pr<strong>of</strong>essional, Web and Graphics<br />

Design<strong>in</strong>g, General Fitter and Fabrication. Curricula along with lesson plans have been revised/up<br />

graded to import /export, procedure & documentation, <strong>in</strong>dustrial stitch<strong>in</strong>g, textile weav<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

computer textile design<strong>in</strong>g, leather garments stitch<strong>in</strong>g, screen pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, welder / fabricator,<br />

electronics technician, veter<strong>in</strong>ary assistant, agriculture field assistant, tunnel farm<strong>in</strong>g, tractor<br />

mechanic, auto electrician. Bio Metrics Based attendance system – Jun 30, 2011 has been<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced with implementation <strong>of</strong> Micros<strong>of</strong>t Exchange 2010 and Unified Communications. The<br />

needs, target groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2<br />

87


Table 61: Staff & Teacher Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institute<br />

Courses <strong>of</strong>fered by STTI<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce Oct 2008<br />

Offered to<br />

Strength<br />

Pedagogy Level 1<br />

Pedagogy Level 2<br />

Skill Up Gradation<br />

Admission & Placement<br />

Techniques<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Competencies Course<br />

Account<strong>in</strong>g and audit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

competencies<br />

Advance Leadership<br />

Certificate<br />

Managerial<br />

Competencies Course<br />

Life Skill Course<br />

Leadership &<br />

Management Course<br />

Audit<strong>in</strong>g Competencies<br />

Course<br />

Total<br />

% Tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

Managers/<br />

Dy. Managers/<br />

Assistant Manager<br />

Regional & Area<br />

Managers<br />

Instructional Staff<br />

(Instructors & Lab<br />

Assistant)<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Staff<br />

(Pr<strong>in</strong>cipals, APO,<br />

AAO)<br />

33 27 27 82%<br />

13 18 13 31 238%<br />

1328 882 30 740 24 1676 126%<br />

335 67 39 123 55 91 375 112%<br />

Source: PVTC 2009-10<br />

Box-10: Achievements <strong>in</strong> Technical <strong>Education</strong><br />

The achievements <strong>of</strong> PVTC <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce are wide network deployment and <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g courses to a potential<br />

<strong>of</strong> 18.9 million potential students <strong>in</strong> next 5 years. Poverty reduction by 10% and availability <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

resource <strong>in</strong> the local & <strong>in</strong>ternational market. Aggressive <strong>in</strong>take strategies ma<strong>in</strong>ly focus <strong>in</strong> the regions, reta<strong>in</strong><br />

students and maximize their satisfaction. This will help to reduce drop-out rate and <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the<br />

students. PVTC has set up an analytical market<strong>in</strong>g unit that addresses the drop-out issues <strong>in</strong> a systematic<br />

way, <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g modular courses to attract people to come back and jo<strong>in</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>. PVTC has <strong>in</strong>creased operational<br />

efficiency and by now operational and structure costs can be controlled. However PVTC need to improve the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g teachers’ quality and rationalize numbers and <strong>in</strong>troduce monthly track<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms to be<br />

implemented ensur<strong>in</strong>g systematic analysis and optimization efforts by different departments. PVTC<br />

successfully implemented quick rehabilitation plan through vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to flood affected youth.<br />

3.8: Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.8.1: <strong>Policy</strong><br />

It is a universal pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that the development <strong>of</strong> any society is assessed by the manner <strong>in</strong> which it<br />

protects <strong>of</strong> the weak and vulnerable sections <strong>of</strong> the society. In a civilized society maximum<br />

attention is paid to the welfare <strong>of</strong> their underprivileged and weaker members by enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to<br />

live an honorable life. The people who are suffer<strong>in</strong>g from physical and mental disabilities need<br />

special attention <strong>of</strong> the society. The development <strong>of</strong> the special education sector has been identified<br />

as a high priority focus area by the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> and Special <strong>Education</strong> Department took a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiatives that have yielded considerable ga<strong>in</strong>s, i.e. enhancement <strong>in</strong> enrollment,<br />

employment <strong>of</strong> teachers, strengthen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> facilities to disabled students and <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong><br />

activities to improve quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>structions. There is need to consolidate these ga<strong>in</strong>s and to plan for<br />

further progress <strong>in</strong> key areas, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ensur<strong>in</strong>g stable and predictable f<strong>in</strong>ancial flows for the<br />

sector; ensur<strong>in</strong>g maximum coverage <strong>of</strong> special students for provid<strong>in</strong>g them educational facilities,<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> policy on education with disabilities, adoption <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally accepted best<br />

practices, vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational rehabilitation center for the disabled<br />

and establishment <strong>of</strong> I.T Labs. In fact, it is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the state to take care <strong>of</strong> the disabled<br />

88


and especially, the disabled children <strong>in</strong> the society. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to census 1998, the data <strong>of</strong> disabled<br />

population is as under:-<br />

Total Population <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

73.62 million<br />

Disabled Population<br />

1.82 million<br />

%age 2.48%<br />

Table 62: Disabled Population<br />

Age Group<br />

Visually Hear<strong>in</strong>g Physically Mentally Multiple Other TOTAL<br />

Impaired Impaired Disabled Retarded Disability<br />

School go<strong>in</strong>g age 5- 40359 60005 89642 99409 54620 261660 605695<br />

19 Years<br />

Below 5 Years 16026 12942 18917 25846 17405 117500 208636<br />

Above 19 Years 98577 76310 271881 141699 75323 348502 1012292<br />

TOTAL 154962 149257 380440 266954 147348 727662 1826623<br />

Disability wise %age 8.48 8.17 20.83 14.61 8.07 39.84 100<br />

Source: Population Census 1998<br />

Over 600,000 <strong>of</strong> children suffer from different types <strong>of</strong> disabilities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. At the moment 209<br />

Special <strong>Education</strong> Institutions are hav<strong>in</strong>g enrollment <strong>of</strong> 18388, an endeavor to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> quantitative<br />

and qualitative improvement <strong>in</strong> the lives <strong>of</strong> special children. After the lapse <strong>of</strong> 13-years <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population census, 1998, the data with regards to disabled population has lost its authenticity.<br />

Resultantly a great <strong>in</strong>convenience is be<strong>in</strong>g experienced <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g for the disabled children <strong>of</strong><br />

school-go<strong>in</strong>g-age. Keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the trend <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> population, the department feels that<br />

there is an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> disabled population.<br />

3.8.2: Interventions to Improve Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

After the creation <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dependent department <strong>of</strong> special education <strong>in</strong> October, 2003, a substantial<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> enrollment <strong>of</strong> students <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> special education has been achieved, 300%<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2005 - 2009. This has been possible due to follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>centives, by the<br />

Govt. <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Special <strong>Education</strong> Department:-<br />

• Stipend @ Rs.200/- per month per student<br />

• Free uniform<br />

• Free text & Braille books<br />

• Free pick & drop facility<br />

• Free board<strong>in</strong>g & lodg<strong>in</strong>g facility<br />

• Free milk pack <strong>of</strong> 250 ml daily<br />

• Merit scholarship<br />

• 36-build<strong>in</strong>gs with special facilities to special education centers<br />

• Cochlear Implant Devices to Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired Students<br />

• Up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Institutions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

Table 63: Year-wise Enrollment<br />

Disability 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10<br />

(Base year)<br />

Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired 3126 6692 7528 8709 11516 11742<br />

Visually Impaired 373 858 902 1023 1193 1291<br />

Physically Disabled 134 443 549 1322 1592 1501<br />

89


90<br />

Mentally Retarded 157 1125 1483 2081 2935 3111<br />

Slow Learners -- -- -- -- -- 1133<br />

Total: 3790 9118 10462 13135 17236 18778<br />

Source: Special <strong>Education</strong> Department Performance Report 2010-2011<br />

Besides the above <strong>in</strong>itiatives, the special education department has provided follow<strong>in</strong>g services for<br />

the rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> disabled students:-<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> 34 ideological Cl<strong>in</strong>ics <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g impaired <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> 19 Computer Labs <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g impaired and physical<br />

disabled.<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> 06 Low Vision Assessment Centers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> 06 Centers for the Mentally Retarded Children.<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> 35 Ear Mould Fabrication Units <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g impaired at<br />

district level.<br />

• Outreach programme for the assessment <strong>of</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g loss <strong>of</strong> the students <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong><br />

general education.<br />

• Outreach programme for the assessment <strong>of</strong> vision <strong>of</strong> the students <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> general<br />

education<br />

3.8.3: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

Special <strong>Education</strong> Department <strong>in</strong>tends to achieve the aforementioned objective through the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g strategic <strong>in</strong>terventions:<br />

• Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g, expansion and up-gradation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g educational facilities.<br />

• Technical and f<strong>in</strong>ancial support <strong>of</strong> civil society organizations provid<strong>in</strong>g education to<br />

special children.<br />

• Promotion <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusive education system to provide educational facilities to the special<br />

students at their doorsteps and to ensure maximum coverage.<br />

• Allied services, like provision <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation services, sports facilities, vocational<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, IT education etc.<br />

The Department <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> has identified the follow<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terventions:-<br />

i) Establishment <strong>of</strong> database centers regard<strong>in</strong>g prevalence <strong>of</strong> disability and problems<br />

confront<strong>in</strong>g with Persons with Disabilities.<br />

ii) Ensur<strong>in</strong>g maximum coverage <strong>of</strong> special students for provid<strong>in</strong>g them educational<br />

facilities.<br />

iii) Preparation <strong>of</strong> policy on education for children with disabilities.<br />

iv) Development <strong>of</strong> curriculum <strong>in</strong> accordance with the needs <strong>of</strong> special students.<br />

v) Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> teachers and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals work<strong>in</strong>g for special students.<br />

vi) Services for assessment <strong>of</strong> disability.<br />

vii) I.T. education for students with disabilities.<br />

viii) Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Technical <strong>Education</strong> for special students.<br />

ix) Sports for special students.<br />

x) Establishment <strong>of</strong> research Centre.<br />

xi) Public awareness for disability related issues.<br />

xii) Coord<strong>in</strong>ation with relevant stakeholders for education, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

special students.<br />

xiii) Availability <strong>of</strong> rehabilitative services for special students.


xiv)<br />

xv)<br />

Creation <strong>of</strong> disability friendly environment for special students.<br />

Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Public Private Partnership for education <strong>of</strong> children with<br />

disabilities.<br />

• Enhancement <strong>of</strong> enrolment through provision <strong>of</strong>:-<br />

• Build<strong>in</strong>gs with special facilities to special education centers<br />

• Cochlear Implant Devices to Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired Students<br />

• Up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Institutions / Centers <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

• Stipend<br />

• Free uniform<br />

• Free text & Braille books<br />

• Free pick & drop facility<br />

• Merit scholarship<br />

• Free board<strong>in</strong>g & lodg<strong>in</strong>g facility<br />

• Adoption <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally accepted best practices<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> Technical & Vocational Institutions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> Computer Labs with Assistive Technology<br />

• Data base center for the disabled<br />

3.8.4: Number <strong>of</strong> Institution.<br />

Prior to establishment <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dependent department <strong>of</strong> special education 51-<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

were function<strong>in</strong>g under the supervision <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Department. The detail is as under:-<br />

Table 64: Disabilities<br />

Disabilities<br />

LEVEL<br />

Primary Middle Secondary Higher<br />

Secondary<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Colleges<br />

Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired 15 08 08 01 02<br />

Institute<br />

Visually Impaired 02 06 03 -- 01<br />

Institute<br />

Physically Disabled -- 02 -- -- --<br />

School<br />

Mentally Retarded 03 -- -- -- --<br />

Institute<br />

Source: Special <strong>Education</strong> Department Performance Report 2010-2011<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s an ongo<strong>in</strong>g commitment to achieve Millennium<br />

Development Goals by provid<strong>in</strong>g special educational facilities to school go<strong>in</strong>g age special<br />

children and ensure maximum coverage by 2015. The Govt. <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has taken various<br />

steps to enroll disabled children between ages from 05 to 19-years.<br />

3.8.5: Nutrition Programme<br />

The Government is committed to provide free educational facilities to the special children<br />

on modern and scientific l<strong>in</strong>es to br<strong>in</strong>g them at par with the normal children and also to<br />

make them self-supportive and self-reliant members <strong>of</strong> the society and enable them to earn<br />

their livelihood <strong>in</strong> a respectable manner. The enrollment <strong>of</strong> disabled students has <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

over the years.<br />

Table 65: Different Disabilities<br />

Disability 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08<br />

(Base year)<br />

Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired 3126 6692 7528 8709<br />

91


Visually Impaired 373 858 902 1023<br />

Physically Disabled 157 1125 1483 2081<br />

Mentally Retarded 134 443 549 1322<br />

Total: 3790 9118 10462 13135<br />

Source: Special <strong>Education</strong> Department Performance Report 2010-2011<br />

Under the directions <strong>of</strong> Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister, <strong>Punjab</strong> a scheme titled "Provision <strong>of</strong> Cochlear Implant for<br />

the Students <strong>of</strong> Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>" was approved at a total cost <strong>of</strong> Rs.177.662 million.<br />

Under this scheme, 115 Cochlear Implant Devices are proposed to be provided to hear<strong>in</strong>g impaired<br />

students <strong>of</strong> special education <strong>in</strong>stitutions / centers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g the period <strong>of</strong> 03-years. Year<br />

wise allocation <strong>of</strong> funds and number <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries is as under:-<br />

Table 66: Budget Allocation (Rs. <strong>in</strong> millions)<br />

# Year Allocation <strong>of</strong> Funds No. <strong>of</strong> Beneficiaries<br />

1. 2008-09 36.800 30<br />

2. 2009-10 50.000 30<br />

3. 2010-11 85.900 55<br />

Source: Special <strong>Education</strong> Department Performance Report 2010-2011<br />

So far 22 students have been implanted the Cochlear Devices out <strong>of</strong> 115 recommended by the<br />

Department.<br />

3.8.6: Vision <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Department 44<br />

To provide conducive learn<strong>in</strong>g environment to the disabled and physically challenged persons so as<br />

to make them useful members <strong>of</strong> the society and utilize their potential and skills <strong>in</strong> all spheres <strong>of</strong><br />

life.<br />

Table 67: Trend <strong>of</strong> Allocations (Rs. In millions)<br />

Year Orig<strong>in</strong>al Allocation Revised Allocation<br />

2005-06 500.000 409.245<br />

2006-07 600.000 600.000<br />

2007-08 945.450 844.134<br />

2008-09 1825.000 604.742<br />

2009-10 1000.000<br />

3.8.7: <strong>Policy</strong> Interventions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

• Provide educational facilities to school go<strong>in</strong>g age special children and ensure<br />

maximum coverage by 2015<br />

• Enhance enrolment <strong>of</strong> special children <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutions/centers <strong>of</strong> special education<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> through improved facilities<br />

• Impart knowledge and skills to physically challenged children to enable them to<br />

become economically <strong>in</strong>dependent members <strong>of</strong> the society<br />

• Provide healthy atmosphere to the special children <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutions/centers <strong>of</strong><br />

special education <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> by provid<strong>in</strong>g them build<strong>in</strong>gs with special facilities<br />

• Skill development & rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> physically challenged children<br />

44<br />

Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Development Programme 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

92


3.8.8: Strategic Interventions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

To achieve above mentioned goals, the follow<strong>in</strong>g measures will be taken:-<br />

• Enhancement <strong>of</strong> enrolment through provision <strong>of</strong>:-<br />

• Build<strong>in</strong>gs with special facilities to special education centers<br />

• Cochlear implant devices to hear<strong>in</strong>g impaired students<br />

• Stipend<br />

• Free uniform<br />

• Free text & Braille books<br />

• Free pick & drop facility<br />

• Merit scholarship<br />

• Free board<strong>in</strong>g & lodg<strong>in</strong>g facility<br />

• Free teach<strong>in</strong>g aids<br />

• Improvement <strong>of</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g methodologies through teachers tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme<br />

• Adoption <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally accepted best practices<br />

(i)<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Cochlear Implant for the Students <strong>of</strong> Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired Children<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> (Phase-I) 45<br />

The scheme titled “Provision <strong>of</strong> Cochlear Implant for the Students <strong>of</strong> Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> (Phase-I)” was approved at a total cost <strong>of</strong> Rs 177.662 million by the Department<br />

Development Sub Committee <strong>in</strong> its meet<strong>in</strong>g held on 23-12-2008. Under this scheme, 115<br />

Cochlear Implant Devices were proposed to be provided to Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired students <strong>of</strong><br />

Special <strong>Education</strong> Institutions/Centers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g the period <strong>of</strong> 3 years. Year wise<br />

allocation and number <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries is as under:-<br />

Table 68: Allocation and Number <strong>of</strong> Beneficiaries<br />

# Year No. <strong>of</strong> Beneficiaries Allocation<br />

1 2008-09 30 Rs 41.762 million<br />

2 2009-10 30 Rs 50.000 million<br />

3 2010-11 55 Rs 85.900 million<br />

(ii)<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> International Standard Rehabilitation Centre for Disabled<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> is committed to provide free education, vocational and<br />

rehabilitation facilities to the special children on modern and scientific l<strong>in</strong>es so as to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them at par with the normal children and to make them self-supportive and self-reliant<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the society. Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>Punjab</strong> desired to establish an International Standard<br />

Rehabilitation Centre for the Disabled at Lahore. The scheme would be executed by the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Management to be constituted by the Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister.<br />

(iii)<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> Build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Centers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> (Phase-II)<br />

Special <strong>Education</strong> Department has planned to provide build<strong>in</strong>gs to special education centers<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> which are function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rented build<strong>in</strong>gs. The build<strong>in</strong>gs will be constructed <strong>in</strong><br />

accordance with the need <strong>of</strong> special students <strong>of</strong> four disabilities for which a standard design<br />

45<br />

Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Development Programme 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

93


prepared by the Architecture Department has been approved by the Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 2007-08, a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs 478.980 million was provided to 05<br />

District Governments for construction <strong>of</strong> 13 build<strong>in</strong>gs. Construction work on these build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

is under progress. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 2008-09, a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs 361.155 million has been provided<br />

to six District Governments for the construction <strong>of</strong> 08 build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> special education centers.<br />

The department has planned to construct 15 build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Centers <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

seven Districts through Development Programme 2009-10. For these build<strong>in</strong>gs, land has<br />

been transferred to Special <strong>Education</strong> Department by the Board <strong>of</strong> Revenue, <strong>Punjab</strong>. These<br />

build<strong>in</strong>gs will be completed dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. 1500 special students <strong>of</strong><br />

centers <strong>of</strong> special education will benefit out <strong>of</strong> it. The detail <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs to be constructed<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 2009-10 is as under 46 :-<br />

Table 69: Construction <strong>of</strong> Build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Centers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>:<br />

# Name <strong>of</strong> District Name <strong>of</strong> Centre<br />

1 Sargodha<br />

(05)<br />

GSEC, Sahiwal<br />

GSEC, Silanwali<br />

GSEC, Kot Moman<br />

GSEC, Shahpur Saddar<br />

2 Bhakkar<br />

(02)<br />

3 T.T. S<strong>in</strong>gh<br />

(01)<br />

4 Khanewal<br />

(03)<br />

5 Lahore<br />

(02)<br />

6 Hafizabad<br />

(01)<br />

7 Bahawalpur<br />

(01)<br />

GSEC, Bhalwal<br />

GSEC, Bhakkar<br />

GSEC, Mankara<br />

GSEC, Gojra<br />

GSEC, Jahanian<br />

GSEC, Mian Channu<br />

GSEC, Kabirwala<br />

GSEC, Nishter Town<br />

GSEC, Wagha Town<br />

GSEC, P<strong>in</strong>di Bhattian<br />

GSEC, Khairpur Tamiwali<br />

(iv)<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Govt. Degree College <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> at<br />

Lahore<br />

At present two Degree Colleges <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong>, one at Lahore and the other at<br />

Bahawalpur are function<strong>in</strong>g. Government Degree College <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> Lahore was<br />

established <strong>in</strong> 2004-05. This college is function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Government Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

College <strong>of</strong> the Teachers <strong>of</strong> Deaf (Special House), Lahore. The function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> both the<br />

colleges <strong>in</strong> same premises is creat<strong>in</strong>g problems for the college adm<strong>in</strong>istrations, especially <strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> board<strong>in</strong>g facilities. The enrolment <strong>of</strong> special students is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g day by day and<br />

students from other cities demand hostel facilities. To cope with the demand, the department<br />

has planned to provide a separate build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> its own to Govt. Degree College <strong>of</strong> Special<br />

<strong>Education</strong>, Lahore. The estimated cost <strong>of</strong> the project is Rs 300.000 million, out <strong>of</strong> which Rs<br />

66.000 million are proposed to be provided dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 2009-2010.<br />

46<br />

Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Development Programme 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

94


(v)<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> 09 Build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Offices <strong>of</strong> District <strong>Education</strong> Officers (SPL-<br />

EDU) <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Rs 31.500 Million<br />

At present, <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> DEO (Spl.Edu) <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> are function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> which is not conducive for <strong>of</strong>fice as well as educational<br />

environment. To provide them a separate build<strong>in</strong>g, the Department has decided to construct<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fice build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> DEO (Spl.Edu) <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong> the premises <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions/schools <strong>of</strong><br />

Special <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> where sufficient land to construct the <strong>of</strong>fices is available.<br />

Necessary equipment/furniture will also be provided to these <strong>of</strong>fices 47 .<br />

3.8.9: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

On the occasion <strong>of</strong> celebration <strong>of</strong> 3 rd December, 2009 "International Day <strong>of</strong> Persons with<br />

Disabilities", Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister, <strong>Punjab</strong> was pleased to <strong>in</strong>troduce reforms for the betterment <strong>of</strong><br />

disabled children. After detailed deliberation, the committee recommended the reforms <strong>in</strong><br />

special education to Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister for his k<strong>in</strong>d approval. The Honorable Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

approved the follow<strong>in</strong>g reforms:-<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> Database for Special Children.<br />

• The model <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusive education should be <strong>in</strong>troduced. MOU shall be signed with<br />

school education department for impart<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to their teachers and provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

barrier free environment to special children <strong>in</strong> the normal schools.<br />

• <strong>Policy</strong> on education <strong>of</strong> children / persons with disabilities will provide a vision and<br />

guidance to the pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>of</strong> special education for provision <strong>of</strong> education and<br />

skill development facilities on the pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational best practices.<br />

• Curricula for special people shall be designed to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> each<br />

disability. An organized, systematic and formal curriculum is required to improve the<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g and achievement level <strong>of</strong> special children at various educational levels.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> curriculum will benefit the disabled students <strong>of</strong> government<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions as well as <strong>in</strong>stitutions run by the NGOs.<br />

• The education <strong>of</strong> teachers has to be consisted as an <strong>in</strong>tegral part <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong><br />

education. It has to focus its attention on the new role <strong>of</strong> teacher education. The<br />

system <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>-service education shall be based upon a concept <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

education which is widely adopted as a strategy <strong>in</strong> developed countries <strong>of</strong> the world.<br />

Its cornerstones are the systematic, cont<strong>in</strong>uous, and <strong>in</strong>dividual approach to the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> education, as well as the tendencies to make the system <strong>of</strong> education more<br />

fundamental & humanization, flexible to rapid changes <strong>in</strong> social, economic as well<br />

as technical & technological conditions, closely connected to real practical activities<br />

and skill improvement.<br />

• Assistive devices and s<strong>of</strong>tware makes learn<strong>in</strong>g easy and even helps rehabilitate<br />

special students. Video images, computer games tremendously help <strong>in</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g I.Q.<br />

level understand<strong>in</strong>g, motor and sensory control, attention and focus level is<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased. The Special <strong>Education</strong> Department on the analogy <strong>of</strong> Schools <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department <strong>in</strong>tends shall establish computer labs <strong>in</strong> all centers and schools.<br />

• Services for assessment and diagnosis <strong>of</strong> disability be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>fered by the health<br />

Department, Special <strong>Education</strong> Department and NGOs are very limited and these are<br />

required to be <strong>in</strong>creased.<br />

47<br />

Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Development Programme 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

95


• To make the special children / persons self-support<strong>in</strong>g and economically <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

technical education and vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is essential. Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department shall establish technical and vocational skill development tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutes for special students / persons at each divisional Headquarter because<br />

special children / persons require special attention and handl<strong>in</strong>g. National Vocational<br />

& Technical Commission (NAVTEC) and <strong>Punjab</strong> Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Council<br />

(PVTC) do not have teachers to tra<strong>in</strong> special persons.<br />

• Apart from establish<strong>in</strong>g its own technical & vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutes, the Special<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Department shall co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate with TEVETA to ensure that 5% seats<br />

reserved <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>stitutions for special students are utilized to its maximum.<br />

• The sports facilities <strong>in</strong> special education <strong>in</strong>stitutions shall be managed for all<br />

students. Relevant organizations like Sports Department, <strong>Punjab</strong> Sports Board and<br />

Pakistan Sports Board & Pakistan Cricket Board will be coord<strong>in</strong>ated for this purpose.<br />

Opportunities for participation <strong>of</strong> students <strong>in</strong> local, departmental, National & Inter-<br />

National sports <strong>of</strong> special persons will be explored.<br />

• Therefore, there is a need to launch a massive campaign about disability related<br />

issues. A massive campaign shall be planned for public awareness through pr<strong>in</strong>t and<br />

electronic media. This campaign will be coord<strong>in</strong>ated by the Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department.<br />

• The students who pass 5 th class exam<strong>in</strong>ation have no opportunity to pursue their<br />

further studies due to non-availability <strong>of</strong> middle schools at Tehsil level. Therefore,<br />

up-gradation 112-Special <strong>Education</strong> Centers from primary to middle level will<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g the special students with opportunities <strong>of</strong> higher learn<strong>in</strong>g. These<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions have been planned to be up-graded dur<strong>in</strong>g the Academic Session 2010-<br />

11. After up-gradation <strong>of</strong> these centers, about 2000 students will be able to pursue<br />

their higher education.<br />

• The department has shortage <strong>of</strong> human resource. Qualified and tra<strong>in</strong>ed human<br />

resource for Special <strong>Education</strong> is not easily available. Despite these caveats, the<br />

department has appo<strong>in</strong>ted 319 teachers <strong>in</strong> Grade-16 and 17 <strong>in</strong> December 2010. The<br />

selection is made through <strong>Punjab</strong> Public Service Commission (PPSC). 337 positions<br />

<strong>in</strong> different categories are ly<strong>in</strong>g vacant at the moment.<br />

• Special <strong>Education</strong> Department has <strong>in</strong>troduced Information Communication<br />

Technology (ICT). The department has now <strong>in</strong>troduced ICT <strong>in</strong> 37 Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

Institutions dur<strong>in</strong>g 2011-2012. Special furniture is required for special children and<br />

the department has <strong>in</strong>troduced furniture accord<strong>in</strong>g to the requirements <strong>of</strong> the special<br />

children. There are areas still untapped and un-served <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and there is<br />

<strong>in</strong>cessant demand from the parents <strong>of</strong> the special children for open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> new special<br />

education centers. The department is plann<strong>in</strong>g to set up special education centers at<br />

District and Tehsil Headquarters. Seven Special <strong>Education</strong> Centers at the cost <strong>of</strong> Rs<br />

52.50 have been planned dur<strong>in</strong>g 2011-2012.<br />

The needs, target groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong><br />

Section 7.2<br />

3.9: Literacy and Non-Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong><br />

3.9.1: <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Literacy tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and non-formal learn<strong>in</strong>g can be two different types <strong>of</strong> activities although with a<br />

96


large overlap. Non-formal learn<strong>in</strong>g can take the form <strong>of</strong> literacy tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g but it also <strong>in</strong>cludes a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g activities such as on the job skill tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and traditional<br />

apprenticeships. In Pakistan’s context, literacy programmes generally consider adults and young<br />

people who are out-<strong>of</strong>-school. The non-formal learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cludes these categories but also other on<br />

the job learn<strong>in</strong>g that youths and adults might participate <strong>in</strong>, which may not have rais<strong>in</strong>g literacy as<br />

its objective. There are multiple causes <strong>of</strong> low literacy social taboos, poverty, child labor, and<br />

illiteracy <strong>of</strong> the parents/families and <strong>in</strong>stitutional weaknesses. Efforts to combat illiteracy have been<br />

half hearted, disjo<strong>in</strong>ted and not suited to local conditions and requirements. At the prov<strong>in</strong>cial level,<br />

there is a lack <strong>of</strong> uniformity <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g structures, and the setup varies from prov<strong>in</strong>ce to prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

There is also a question <strong>of</strong> what priority literacy promotion should be given <strong>in</strong> the public budget<br />

when resources are not available for basic facilities <strong>in</strong> the primary schools, although the private<br />

sector can contribute resources <strong>in</strong> this field <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g. The case for improv<strong>in</strong>g literacy is based on<br />

both its economic and social benefits, quite apart from the large benefit that accrues to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> personal development. In the economic field, literacy scores contribute to<br />

higher productivity, a contribution that is <strong>in</strong> addition to the contribution made by years <strong>of</strong><br />

school<strong>in</strong>g. A more literate person has higher participation rates <strong>in</strong> the labor force, is more likely to<br />

be an entrepreneur, and is more open to adopt<strong>in</strong>g new techniques <strong>of</strong> production. A literate parent<br />

contributes to better lean<strong>in</strong>g achievement for his or her children. There are, as well, wider social<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> literacy that have been estimated empirically. There is a noticeable impact on health. A<br />

literate person is more likely to have better health and <strong>in</strong>cur less expenditures costs on health<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. Participation <strong>in</strong> civic activities and democratic processes are more likely with literacy<br />

than without.<br />

The most important social objective served by literacy is achiev<strong>in</strong>g greater social <strong>in</strong>clusiveness.<br />

There are four ma<strong>in</strong> difficulties with current literacy and non-formal learn<strong>in</strong>g programme, which<br />

needs to be addressed. First, the quality <strong>of</strong> such programmes is variable as they are not regulated by<br />

some m<strong>in</strong>imum quality standards. One reason for the <strong>of</strong>ten poor quality <strong>of</strong> the programmes is low<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> teachers, which is also not regulated. Second, a certification and accreditation regime is<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g. There are no bench marks or standards that can be used for assess<strong>in</strong>g literacy programmes.<br />

As a consequence, it is difficult to l<strong>in</strong>k the certificate <strong>of</strong>fered by these programmes to formal<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g opportunities. Hence, graduates <strong>of</strong> these programmes f<strong>in</strong>d it difficult to enter <strong>in</strong> to the<br />

formal sector. Third, current literacy programmes are also not well-l<strong>in</strong>ked to employment<br />

opportunities. Fourth, literacy programmes are <strong>of</strong>ten found to be effective if there is a follow-up<br />

programme <strong>of</strong> re<strong>in</strong>forcement, which are lack<strong>in</strong>g at present.<br />

NEP 2009 identified the follow<strong>in</strong>g policy actions:<br />

• Literacy rates hall be <strong>in</strong>creased up to 86% by 2015 through up-scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />

programmes <strong>of</strong> adult literacy and non-formal basic education <strong>in</strong> the country.<br />

• Susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> adult literacy and NFE programmes shall be ensured by strengthen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

organizational structure, coord<strong>in</strong>ation and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g budgetary allocation for this neglected<br />

sub sector.<br />

• Government shall develop a national literacy curriculum and identify the <strong>in</strong>structional<br />

material, teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g modules and pr<strong>of</strong>essional development programmes to support the<br />

curriculum. The curriculum shall be objective driven, so as to facilitate assimilation <strong>of</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ees <strong>in</strong>to ma<strong>in</strong>stream economic activity, by impart<strong>in</strong>g skill tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g as per local needs<br />

and market trends.<br />

• Government shall develop and enforce m<strong>in</strong>imum quality standards for organizations<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> literacy <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> literacy certification and accreditation regime. The<br />

literacy providers shall be required to <strong>of</strong>fer the literacy programmes accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

97


specified standards.<br />

• A system shall be developed to ma<strong>in</strong>stream the students <strong>in</strong> non-formal programmes <strong>in</strong> to<br />

regular education system, and a system <strong>of</strong> equivalence shall be developed to permit such<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g. New literates shall receive formal certification so as to facilitate their entry<br />

<strong>in</strong> to government schools.<br />

• Prov<strong>in</strong>ces and district governments shall allocate a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> 3% <strong>of</strong> education budget for<br />

literacy and non-formal basic education (NFBE).<br />

• L<strong>in</strong>kages <strong>of</strong> non-formal education with <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>in</strong>ternship programmes shall be<br />

developed to enhance economic benefits <strong>of</strong> participation.<br />

• Horizontal l<strong>in</strong>kages between schools and vocational/skills tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centers shall be<br />

established.<br />

• Government schools shall <strong>in</strong>itiate Non-Formal <strong>Education</strong> (NFE) stream for child laborers.<br />

Children <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> various jobs or work shall be brought with<strong>in</strong> the ambit <strong>of</strong> non-formal<br />

education system with need-based schedules and tim<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

• NEF programmes, currently <strong>in</strong> practice up to grade 5 shall be expanded up to grade 10,<br />

where required. Special literacy skills programmes shall target older child laborers, boys and<br />

girls (14 to17years). Special educational stipends shall be <strong>in</strong>troduced to rehabilitate child<br />

laborers.<br />

• Arrangements shall be made to use school build<strong>in</strong>gs (where available) for adult literacy after<br />

school hours. Government shall develop guidel<strong>in</strong>es for post-programme <strong>in</strong>itiatives. Regular<br />

follow-up shall be made a part <strong>of</strong> the literacy programs. Steps shall be taken to ensure that<br />

teachers for adult learners and non-formal education are properly tra<strong>in</strong>ed and have a welldef<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

career structure allow<strong>in</strong>g them to move <strong>in</strong> to ma<strong>in</strong>stream education. International<br />

Development Partners, community and private sector <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> awareness<br />

programmes, content, design and availability <strong>of</strong> facilities, shall be mobilized.<br />

• Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Schools<br />

• Adult Literacy Centers<br />

• Functional Literacy with a vocational life learn<strong>in</strong>g skill<br />

• Community Learn<strong>in</strong>g Centers<br />

The National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2009 (NEP 2009) has clearly chartered the pathway to achieve the<br />

cherished goals <strong>of</strong> ensured access, equity and quality <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> Pakistan. NEP 2009<br />

highlighted the importance <strong>of</strong> Literacy and Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong>. NEP 2009 enunciated that<br />

literacy and non-formal education can be imparted through different activities. Non Formal<br />

<strong>Education</strong> can take the form <strong>of</strong> literacy and adult education but it also <strong>in</strong>cludes a variety <strong>of</strong> other<br />

types <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g activities such as skill development, vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, lifelong learn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous education and traditional apprenticeships. In Pakistan’s context, literacy programs<br />

generally consider adults and young people who are out <strong>of</strong> school, dropouts and those who have<br />

never-been-to-school. The non- formal education <strong>in</strong>cludes these categories but also other on the job<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g that youths and adults might participate rais<strong>in</strong>g literacy and skill development.<br />

The real test <strong>of</strong> a policy lies <strong>in</strong> implementation through a very secure service delivery mechanism.<br />

For successful implementation, the country needs elaborate <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements, adequate and<br />

workable policy framework and pr<strong>of</strong>essional teams with impeccable pr<strong>of</strong>essional and <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity. With this rare but possible nice comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> political will, pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism, suave<br />

policy framework and right budgetary allocations, sure success becomes the fate <strong>of</strong> the nations.<br />

NEP 2009 recognized the multiple causes <strong>of</strong> low literacy i.e. social taboos, societal behavior, tribal<br />

m<strong>in</strong>dset, cultural divides, cultural <strong>in</strong>hibitions, abject poverty, child labor and illiteracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

families and <strong>in</strong>stitutional weaknesses. It has been admitted by the policy makers that efforts to<br />

98


combat illiteracy have been half-hearted, disjo<strong>in</strong>ted and not suited to local conditions and<br />

requirements. At the prov<strong>in</strong>cial level, there is a lack <strong>of</strong> uniformity <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g structures and the set<br />

up varies from prov<strong>in</strong>ce to prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

NEP 2009 adequately elaborated and emphasized to accord top priority to the promotion <strong>of</strong> literacy.<br />

The case for improv<strong>in</strong>g literacy is now rightly based on its economic, cultural and social benefits, <strong>in</strong><br />

addition to equity, productive efficiency, freedom <strong>of</strong> choice, tolerance, respect for diversity and<br />

social cohesion. For the first time <strong>in</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the country, the policy makers have been<br />

sangu<strong>in</strong>e to admit the price nation pays due to illiteracy and the consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate<br />

education to the masses. Although too late but we must have recognized this much earlier that<br />

illiteracy is costlier than literacy <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> economic returns, social impact and response <strong>of</strong><br />

society.NEP 2009 rightly recognized the vital l<strong>in</strong>k between literacy and higher productivity. “In the<br />

economic field, literacy scores contribute to higher productivity, a contribution that is <strong>in</strong> addition to<br />

the contribution made by years <strong>of</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g. More literate person has higher participation rates <strong>in</strong><br />

the labor force, is more likely to be an entrepreneur, and is more open to adopt<strong>in</strong>g new techniques<br />

<strong>of</strong> production.<br />

A literate parent contributes to better lean<strong>in</strong>g achievement for his or her children”. NEP 2009 also<br />

discussed the social benefits <strong>of</strong> literacy. “There are, as well, wider social benefits <strong>of</strong> literacy that<br />

have been estimated empirically. There is a noticeable impact on health. A literate person is more<br />

likely to have better health and <strong>in</strong>cur less expenditures costs on health ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. Participation <strong>in</strong><br />

civic activities and democratic processes are more likely with literacy than without. The most<br />

important social objective served by literacy is achiev<strong>in</strong>g greater social <strong>in</strong>clusiveness”.<br />

NEP 2009 enumerated the difficulties and bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> the system hamper<strong>in</strong>g the literacy rate.<br />

“There are difficulties with current literacy and non-formal learn<strong>in</strong>g programme, which needs to be<br />

addressed. First, the quality <strong>of</strong> such programmes is variable as they are not regulated by some<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum quality standards. One reason for the <strong>of</strong>ten poor quality <strong>of</strong> the programmes is low quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> teachers, which is also not regulated. Second, a certification and accreditation regime is miss<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

There are no benchmarks or standards that can be used for assess<strong>in</strong>g literacy programmes.” NEP<br />

2009 has also addressed the myriad challenge <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> emergencies. “Pakistan has endured<br />

large scale emergencies <strong>in</strong> recent years and along with other aspects <strong>of</strong> life, education has suffered<br />

greatly through <strong>in</strong>adequate plann<strong>in</strong>g. Pakistan’s education system has not recognized the need for<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals and groups to grapple with the demands <strong>of</strong> emergencies through<br />

organized and effective responses. Credible rehabilitation and disaster management plans need to be<br />

put <strong>in</strong> place to ensure early restoration <strong>of</strong> education service. School education must prepare pupils<br />

for organized, ameliorative responses”.<br />

NEP 2009 has proposed the follow<strong>in</strong>g policy guidel<strong>in</strong>es:<br />

1. Awareness shall be raised amongst the students regard<strong>in</strong>g emergency situations, natural<br />

disasters and school safety so as to <strong>in</strong>form their behavior <strong>in</strong> the times <strong>of</strong> such crisis.<br />

2. Curriculum for each level <strong>of</strong> education, shall <strong>in</strong>tegrate <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>of</strong> emergencies, natural<br />

disasters and trauma management.<br />

3. Curriculum for Civics <strong>of</strong> secondary and higher secondary level (Grades 9 to 12 shall<br />

formally address response <strong>in</strong> an emergency or disaster, on the basis <strong>of</strong> latest <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

best practices.<br />

4. Teacher education/tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programmes shall <strong>in</strong>clude provisions to enable the teacher to<br />

address education <strong>in</strong> emergencies.<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> is the only prov<strong>in</strong>ce hav<strong>in</strong>g a dedicated department to deal with literacy, Literacy & NFBE<br />

99


Department.<br />

3.9.2: Vision <strong>of</strong> Literacy & NFBE Department<br />

Literate, self-reliant and prosperous <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

3.9.3: <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Literacy& NFBE Department<br />

LNFBED is committed to provide high quality learn<strong>in</strong>g opportunities through non formal means to<br />

all illiterates & out <strong>of</strong> schools population by 2019.<br />

3.9.4: Goal <strong>of</strong> the Literacy & NFBE Department<br />

To achieve 100% literacy rate <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> by the year 2019.<br />

3.9.5: Objectives <strong>of</strong> Literacy & NFBE Department<br />

1) To create opportunities for access to literacy and non-formal education to illiterate and out<br />

<strong>of</strong> school population <strong>of</strong> all age groups <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

2) To take affirmative action for poorest <strong>of</strong> the poor, rural and female segments <strong>of</strong> illiterate<br />

population through specially designed skill oriented <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />

3) To ensure quality learn<strong>in</strong>g by enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the staff capacity <strong>in</strong> Research & Development,<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g & Evaluation and customized curriculum development <strong>in</strong> literacy and nonformal<br />

education sector<br />

4) Motivate & mobilize communities and other stakeholders for creat<strong>in</strong>g a learn<strong>in</strong>g society<br />

through rights and equity based communication, advocacy and awareness <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />

5) To ensure availability <strong>of</strong> reliable, relevant and up to date data, by build<strong>in</strong>g a broad based<br />

data warehouse at LNFBED<br />

3.9.6: Current Issues and <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

MDG and EFA Goals set targets to be achieved. Goal 2 & 3 <strong>of</strong> MDGs emphasized on literacy<br />

especially achiev<strong>in</strong>g universal primary education and Target 2A has to be achieved by 2015<br />

stipulat<strong>in</strong>g that all children can complete a full course <strong>of</strong> primary school<strong>in</strong>g, girls and boys by<br />

enrollment <strong>in</strong> primary education, completion <strong>of</strong> primary education and literacy <strong>of</strong> 15-24 year olds,<br />

female and male. Similarly Goal 3 lays emphasis on promotion <strong>of</strong> gender equality and empower<br />

women and Target 3A particularly focuses elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> gender disparity <strong>in</strong> primary and<br />

secondary education preferably by 2005, and at all levels by 2015 by ratios <strong>of</strong> girls to boys <strong>in</strong><br />

primary, secondary and tertiary education, share <strong>of</strong> women <strong>in</strong> wage employment <strong>in</strong> the nonagricultural<br />

sector and proportion <strong>of</strong> seats held by women <strong>in</strong> national parliament.<br />

EFA has six <strong>in</strong>ternationally agreed education goals aim to meet the learn<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>of</strong> all children,<br />

youth and adults by 2015. Goal 1 is regard<strong>in</strong>g expand<strong>in</strong>g and improv<strong>in</strong>g comprehensive early<br />

childhood care and education, especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children. Goal<br />

2 is ensur<strong>in</strong>g that by 2015 all children, particularly girls, children <strong>in</strong> difficult circumstances and<br />

those belong<strong>in</strong>g to ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities, have access to, and complete, free and compulsory primary<br />

education <strong>of</strong> good quality. Goal 3 is ensur<strong>in</strong>g that the learn<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>of</strong> all young people and adults<br />

100


are met through equitable access to appropriate learn<strong>in</strong>g and life-skills programmes. Goal 4<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g a 50 per cent improvement <strong>in</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> adult literacy by 2015, especially for women, and<br />

equitable access to basic and cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g education for all adults. Goal 5 elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g gender<br />

disparities <strong>in</strong> primary and secondary education by 2005, and achiev<strong>in</strong>g gender equality <strong>in</strong> education<br />

by 2015, with a focus on ensur<strong>in</strong>g girls’ full and equal access to and achievement <strong>in</strong> basic education<br />

<strong>of</strong> good quality and Goal 6 is improv<strong>in</strong>g all aspects <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> education and ensur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

excellence <strong>of</strong> all so that recognized and measurable learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes are achieved by all,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> literacy, numeracy and essential life skills.<br />

The departmental <strong>in</strong>terventions coupled with a number <strong>of</strong> management reforms and <strong>in</strong>puts<br />

undertaken through the non-development budget would help achieve the Millennium Development<br />

Goals commitments. Literacy is an important <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> education because its improvement is<br />

likely to have an impact, <strong>in</strong> the longer run on other important <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> welfare. The literacy rate<br />

for population 10 years and above has slightly <strong>in</strong>creased from 55 percent <strong>in</strong> 2006-07 to 56 percent<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2007-08. Literacy rema<strong>in</strong>s much higher <strong>in</strong> urban areas than rural areas and much higher <strong>in</strong> men<br />

than women. There is a strong association between literacy and age, with younger cohorts hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

much higher literacy levels. This pattern has been observed both <strong>in</strong> urban and rural areas. Literacy<br />

is strongly associated with household <strong>in</strong>come. Thirty three percent <strong>of</strong> the poorest <strong>in</strong>dividuals are<br />

literate compared to 79 percent <strong>in</strong> the highest <strong>in</strong>come group.<br />

Literacy is an important <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> education because its improvement is likely to have an impact,<br />

<strong>in</strong> the longer run, on other important <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> welfare. The literacy rate for population 10 years<br />

and above is 58 percent dur<strong>in</strong>g 2010-11, as compared to 57% <strong>in</strong> 2008-09. Literacy rema<strong>in</strong>s much<br />

higher <strong>in</strong> urban areas than <strong>in</strong> rural areas and much higher <strong>in</strong> men than <strong>in</strong> women. Prov<strong>in</strong>ce wise<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> leads with 60 percent followed by S<strong>in</strong>dh with 59 percent, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa with 50%<br />

and Baluchistan with 41 percent. Compar<strong>in</strong>g Literacy (10 years and above) for districts with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces, it is revealed that Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di with 82% as compared to Rajanpur with 34%.<br />

PSLM 2010-11 and the figures <strong>in</strong> the tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate that literacy-population 10 years and<br />

older <strong>in</strong> urban areas is 76% whereas it is 80% for male and 71% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas it<br />

is 53% whereas it is 64% for male and 42% for females. The overall literacy-population for 10<br />

years and older is 60 % whereas it is 70% for male and 51% for female.<br />

PSLM 2010-11 and the figures <strong>in</strong> the tables below <strong>in</strong>dicate that literacy-population 15 years and<br />

older <strong>in</strong> urban areas is 74% whereas it is 79% for male and 68% for female. In case <strong>of</strong> rural areas it<br />

is 49% whereas it is 61% for male and 37% for females. The overall literacy-population for 15<br />

years and older is 57% whereas it is 67% for male and 47% for female.<br />

101


Table 70: Literacy-Population 10 Years and Older<br />

DISTRICTS<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

TOTAL<br />

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANK 08-09<br />

Pakistan 81 67 74 63 35 49 69 46 58 57<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 80 71 76 64 42 53 70 51 60 59<br />

Attock 84 65 75 76 47 61 78 50 64 12 61<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 88 78 83 85 64 74 87 71 79 2 79<br />

Jhelum 89 77 83 85 61 72 86 65 75 5 77<br />

Chakwal 90 80 85 90 65 77 90 67 78 3 76<br />

Sargodha 84 70 77 68 36 52 72 45 59 17 61<br />

Bhakkar 77 57 67 62 29 46 65 34 49 28 58<br />

Khushab 83 55 69 74 39 56 77 43 60 16 58<br />

Mianwali 85 57 71 76 42 59 78 46 61 14 57<br />

Faisalabad 80 74 77 65 48 57 72 60 66 9 61<br />

Jhang 75 59 67 63 31 47 66 38 52 26 51<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 81 74 77 76 58 67 77 62 69 8 65<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 70 59 65 52 16 35 58 29 44 34<br />

Gujranwala 82 75 79 75 64 69 79 70 74 6 71<br />

Gujrat 82 76 79 76 62 69 78 66 71 7 73<br />

Sialkot 77 76 77 65 60 62 68 64 66 10 66<br />

Hafizabad 75 60 67 65 43 54 68 48 58 21 58<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong> 87 76 81 71 53 62 73 57 65 11 66<br />

Narowal 82 72 76 65 47 55 67 51 58 19 63<br />

Lahore 82 76 79 71 57 64 80 73 77 4 80<br />

Kasur 75 60 67 65 44 55 68 48 58 18 56<br />

Sheikhupura 79 72 75 63 47 55 69 56 63 13 65<br />

Nankana Sahib 71 63 67 68 49 58 68 52 60 15 61<br />

Vehari 79 67 73 64 37 50 67 43 55 23 54<br />

Multan 79 68 74 60 35 48 68 48 58 20 56<br />

Khanewal 80 61 71 65 33 49 67 39 53 25 52<br />

Lodhran 69 48 59 58 31 45 59 34 47 31 46<br />

D.G.Khan 81 62 71 53 23 39 57 29 43 35 41<br />

Rajanpur 81 62 71 39 14 28 45 22 34 37 27<br />

Layyah 77 63 70 65 37 51 67 42 55 24 52<br />

Muzaffargarh 76 58 67 53 24 39 57 29 43 36 44<br />

Bahawalpur 74 61 68 48 28 38 56 38 47 30 44<br />

Bahawalnagar 71 58 65 54 36 45 58 40 49 29 43<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 76 63 69 50 26 38 56 35 46 32 43<br />

Sahiwal 78 69 73 63 44 53 65 48 56 22 50<br />

Pakpatten 78 67 72 53 26 39 57 33 45 33 45<br />

Okara 79 65 73 59 33 46 62 38 50 27 50<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

102


Table 71: Adult Literacy-Population 15 Years and Older<br />

URBAN RURAL TOTAL<br />

TOTAL<br />

DISTRICTS MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANK 08-09<br />

Pakistan 80 64 72 60 30 45 67 42 55 54<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> 79 68 74 61 37 49 67 47 57 56<br />

Attock 84 62 72 73 41 56 75 45 59 13 55<br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 87 76 82 84 59 71 86 67 76 2 76<br />

Jhelum 89 74 82 83 56 68 85 61 72 5 73<br />

Chakwal 90 78 83 88 60 73 88 63 75 4 73<br />

Sargodha 82 65 73 64 31 47 69 40 54 19 56<br />

Bhakkar 74 50 63 58 24 41 60 28 44 30 52<br />

Khushab 80 49 64 71 32 50 74 36 54 18 52<br />

Mianwali 84 51 67 72 35 53 75 38 56 16 52<br />

Faisalabad 79 71 75 62 44 53 70 57 64 10 58<br />

Jhang 73 54 64 60 26 43 63 33 48 26 47<br />

T.T.S<strong>in</strong>gh 83 70 76 73 54 64 75 57 66 8 61<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>iot 70 55 63 49 14 32 55 26 41 33<br />

Gujranwala 80 72 76 71 58 65 76 66 71 6 69<br />

Gujrat 80 75 78 75 58 66 76 62 69 7 70<br />

Sialkot 77 75 76 65 55 59 68 60 64 9 64<br />

Hafizabad 71 55 63 60 36 48 64 42 53 22 53<br />

MandiBahudd<strong>in</strong> 86 72 79 66 46 56 70 50 60 12 61<br />

Narowal 79 68 73 65 44 53 67 48 56 15 58<br />

Lahore 81 74 78 68 53 61 79 71 75 3 79<br />

Kasur 72 54 63 62 36 49 64 41 53 21 50<br />

Sheikhupura 78 69 73 60 43 51 67 53 60 11 60<br />

Nankana Sahib 68 60 64 65 45 55 66 48 57 14 58<br />

Vehari 77 63 70 60 30 45 63 36 50 23 49<br />

Multan 78 64 71 58 30 44 66 44 55 17 53<br />

Khanewal 77 55 67 61 27 44 65 32 49 25 49<br />

Lodhran 67 44 56 55 24 40 57 27 42 32 43<br />

D.G.Khan 78 56 68 50 17 34 54 22 39 35 37<br />

Rajanpur 82 63 73 35 6 21 42 15 29 37 23<br />

Layyah 76 58 67 60 30 45 62 35 49 24 44<br />

Muzaffargarh 73 52 63 49 18 33 53 23 38 36 39<br />

Bahawalpur 74 59 66 45 25 35 54 35 45 29 42<br />

Bahawalnagar 70 56 62 51 31 41 55 36 45 28 39<br />

Rahim Yar Khan 74 59 67 48 22 35 54 31 42 31 39<br />

Sahiwal 77 65 71 60 41 50 63 45 53 20 47<br />

Pakpatten 77 64 70 48 20 34 53 27 40 34 41<br />

Okara 79 62 70 55 27 41 59 33 46 27 46<br />

Source: PSLM 2010-11<br />

Table below <strong>in</strong>dicate population aged 10 years and older that is literate, expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

the population aged 10 years and older. For all surveys, literacy is taken as the ability to read a<br />

newspaper and to write a simple letter.<br />

103


Table 72: Literacy - Population 10 Years and Older - By Qu<strong>in</strong>tile Group<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION 10 YEARS AND OLDER-2007-08 PSLM<br />

URBAN AREAS RURAL AREAS OVERALL<br />

MAL FEMAL BOTH MALE FEMAL BOTH MALE FEMALE BOTH<br />

PUNJAB:<br />

1stQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

2ndQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

3rdQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

4thQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

5thQu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

78<br />

49<br />

61<br />

72<br />

79<br />

93<br />

66<br />

36<br />

50<br />

57<br />

67<br />

82<br />

72<br />

42<br />

56<br />

64<br />

73<br />

87<br />

66<br />

43<br />

55<br />

68<br />

75<br />

84<br />

40<br />

19<br />

27<br />

41<br />

51<br />

61<br />

53<br />

31<br />

41<br />

54<br />

63<br />

73<br />

70<br />

44<br />

57<br />

69<br />

76<br />

88<br />

48<br />

22<br />

33<br />

46<br />

57<br />

71<br />

59<br />

33<br />

45<br />

57<br />

66<br />

80<br />

Source: PSLM 2007-08<br />

Table 72 <strong>in</strong>dicates population aged 10 years and older that is literate expressed as a<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> the total population aged 10 years and older <strong>in</strong> the qu<strong>in</strong>tile <strong>in</strong>dicated.<br />

Qu<strong>in</strong>tiles are based on per capita consumption expenditure. The 1 st qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals with the lowest consumption level, whereas the 5 th qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

with the highest consumption level. For the 2007-08 PSLM, literacy was taken as the ability<br />

to read a newspaper and to write a simple letter.<br />

Table 73:-Literacy Ratios by Sex and Area<br />

Area<br />

Sex<br />

1998<br />

Census<br />

All Areas Urban Rural<br />

2008-09<br />

1998<br />

Census<br />

2008-09<br />

1998<br />

Census<br />

2008-09<br />

Total 46.6 59.0 64.5 76.0 38.0 51.0<br />

Male 57.2 69.0 70.9 82.0 50.4 63.0<br />

Female 35.1 50.0 57.2 71.0 24.8 39.0<br />

Source: For 1998:-Population Census Organization, <strong>Islamabad</strong>. (ii) Federal Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics<br />

2008-09<br />

Table 74: Trends <strong>of</strong> Allocation <strong>of</strong> Development Budget 48 (Rs. In millions)<br />

Year Orig<strong>in</strong>al Allocation Revised Allocation<br />

2005-06 200.000 179.840<br />

2006-07 275.000 198.940<br />

2007-08 1200.000 650.000<br />

2008-09 1250.000 682.473<br />

2009-10 800.000 231.000<br />

2010-2011 1100.000<br />

Source: L&NFBED 2006-11<br />

48 Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Development Programme 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

104


In 2005-06, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> allocated an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.179.84 million for<br />

L&NFBED. The allocation improved marg<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong> 2006-07 amount<strong>in</strong>g to the tune <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.198.94 million aga<strong>in</strong>st the orig<strong>in</strong>al allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 275.00 million. In 2007-08,<br />

L&NFBED got an allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.650.00 million, substantially higher than all previous<br />

years. 2008-09 however, recorded even higher allocation amount<strong>in</strong>g to the tune <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.682.47 million which plummeted to Rs. 231.00 million aga<strong>in</strong>st the orig<strong>in</strong>al allocation <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.800 million. This is primarily because <strong>of</strong> the unprecedented devastat<strong>in</strong>g floods <strong>of</strong> 2010<br />

and Government re-appropriated the sectoral allocations keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the emergency<br />

situation. After the <strong>in</strong>sertion <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the Constitution, the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

has allocated an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.1100 million, the highest allocation s<strong>in</strong>ce the establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the department <strong>in</strong> 2001.<br />

Figure 10 <strong>in</strong>dicates Net Primary Attendance Rates and Figure 11 <strong>in</strong>dicates the literacy ratios<br />

<strong>of</strong> population aged 10 years and above by sex and area <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998 census and<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2008-09 both <strong>in</strong> Urban and Rural areas. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to 1998<br />

Census the overall literacy <strong>in</strong> urban areas was 64.5% whereas it was 70.9% for male and<br />

57.2% for females. However, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2008-09 <strong>in</strong>dicated overall<br />

literacy rate <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> 76.0% whereas 82.0% for male and 71.0% for females. However, the<br />

situation <strong>in</strong> rural areas has been disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to 1998 Census, the overall<br />

literacy rate <strong>in</strong> rural areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> for population age 10 years and above 38.0% whereas<br />

it was 50.4% for male and 24.8% for female. However, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics<br />

2008-09 recorded overall literacy ratios <strong>of</strong> population aged 10 years and above at 51%<br />

whereas it is 63% for male and 39% for female. There are disparities <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> region, sex<br />

and rural, urban areas.<br />

Figure 10: Net Primary Attendance Rate MICS 2007-08<br />

105


Figure 11: Literacy Ratios <strong>of</strong> Population Aged 10 Years & Above, By Sex and Area<br />

1998 and 2008-09<br />

URBAN<br />

RURAL<br />

Table 75 <strong>in</strong>dicates population aged 10 years and older that has ever attended school expressed<br />

as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the total population aged10 years and older. For the PIHS 2001-02, PSLM<br />

2005-06 and PSLM 2007-08, all those <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have ever attended school (either<br />

currently attend<strong>in</strong>g, or attended <strong>in</strong> the past) were taken to have attended school.<br />

Table 75: Population that has ever Attended School<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

PUNJAB:<br />

1st Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

2nd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

3rd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

4th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

5th Qu<strong>in</strong>tile<br />

PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION 10 YEARS AND OLDER – 2007-08 PSLM<br />

URBAN AREAS<br />

RURAL AREAS<br />

Male Female Both Male Female Both<br />

80<br />

54<br />

66<br />

74<br />

82<br />

93<br />

69<br />

42<br />

54<br />

62<br />

70<br />

83<br />

74<br />

48<br />

60<br />

68<br />

76<br />

88<br />

68<br />

48<br />

59<br />

69<br />

76<br />

84<br />

43<br />

24<br />

32<br />

45<br />

53<br />

62<br />

55<br />

35<br />

45<br />

57<br />

64<br />

73<br />

106


Source: PSLM 2007-08<br />

Tables 70-74 above <strong>in</strong>dicate qu<strong>in</strong>tiles are based on per capita consumption expenditure.<br />

The 1st qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the lowest consumption level, whereas the 5th<br />

qu<strong>in</strong>tile conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dividuals with the highest consumption level. All those <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

who have ever attended school (either currently attend<strong>in</strong>g, or attended <strong>in</strong> the past) were<br />

taken to have attended school <strong>in</strong> PSLM 2007-08.<br />

Variations <strong>in</strong> literacy rate <strong>in</strong> 15+ age group is similar to those <strong>in</strong> 10+ with lower rates, <strong>in</strong><br />

rural areas particularly for males. The gender gap is slightly narrower <strong>in</strong> major cities and<br />

<strong>in</strong> other urban areas. The district variations <strong>in</strong> literacy rates amongst 15+ year-olds are<br />

similar to those amongst 10+ year-olds. More than half (59%) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> population<br />

above 10 years is literate, with a clear, sharp differential between males (69%) and<br />

females (50%). Literacy (10+ years) varies considerably between urban and rural areas,<br />

with about half (52%) <strong>of</strong> rural-dwellers literate compared to 77 % <strong>in</strong> major cities and 72<br />

% <strong>in</strong> other urban areas. Gender disparities also exist by area <strong>of</strong> residence. In rural areas<br />

64 % males are literate compared to only 40 % females. The gender gap is slightly<br />

narrower <strong>in</strong> major cities (males 81 %; females 74%) and <strong>in</strong> other urban areas (males 78%;<br />

females 65%). Literacy amongst people over 10 years <strong>of</strong> age <strong>in</strong>creases where the older<br />

population is less literate than the younger. While there is the expected positive<br />

correlation with education, <strong>of</strong> those who have never attended school (47% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

10+population), 37% reported that they are literate. Literacy rates (10+ years) were<br />

highest <strong>in</strong> the districts <strong>of</strong> Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di (80%), Jhelum (77%), Lahore and Gujrat (74%) and<br />

lowest <strong>in</strong> Rajanpur (33%), D.G. Khan, Rahim Yar Khan and Lodhran (44%) (MICS<br />

2007-08, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, L&NFBED, 2010)<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> has overall literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 57%, i.e. 61% for males and 48% for females. The<br />

literacy rate however varies be<strong>in</strong>g the highest <strong>in</strong> Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di and the lowest <strong>in</strong> Rajanpur.<br />

The literacy rate <strong>in</strong> tribal areas for females is even less than 10% <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Rajanpur and<br />

D.G.Khan. The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> took a bold <strong>in</strong>itiative and created an <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

Department <strong>in</strong> August 2002. The objective was to eradicate illiteracy from the prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

through Non-Formal <strong>Education</strong>. Before the creation <strong>of</strong> the Department, Non-Formal<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Projects were be<strong>in</strong>g implemented <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces jo<strong>in</strong>tly by the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> and the prov<strong>in</strong>cial Departments <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> with Federal Government<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g. Federal programmes like National Commission for Human Development and<br />

National <strong>Education</strong> Foundation, cont<strong>in</strong>ue to co-exist along with prov<strong>in</strong>cial programmes<br />

but such programmes are now be<strong>in</strong>g implemented entirely by Federal Government<br />

organizations and personnel.<br />

After the 18th Amendment <strong>in</strong> the Constitution, the subject <strong>of</strong> education has been removed<br />

from the concurrent list and implementation commission <strong>in</strong> the Federal Government and<br />

respective departments <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments are work<strong>in</strong>g on legal and<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional framework to take on the roles and responsibilities accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

Constitution. The literacy rate (10 years and older) <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce appears to be<br />

107


<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g and stands at 65% for the year 2007-08. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the PSLM survey <strong>of</strong><br />

2004-05, the literacy rate <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce is 54%. However, <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> numbers,<br />

illiterates are grow<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the MICS, number <strong>of</strong> illiterates <strong>in</strong> 2007-08, was 34<br />

million which has <strong>in</strong>creased to 38 million by 2010. The mandate <strong>of</strong> the Department is to<br />

make <strong>Punjab</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g, thriv<strong>in</strong>g and prosperous. The Five Year Strategy Plan is an<br />

endeavor to achieve the MDGs and EFA goals. The Department has short term, medium<br />

term and long term plans to achieve the cherished goals. Literacy and Non Formal Basic<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Department has already chalked out Ten Year Strategy Plan and has started<br />

implementation through different <strong>in</strong>cipient organic <strong>in</strong>itiatives and projects elaborated <strong>in</strong><br />

this book on, ‘The Five Year Strategy Plan’. Literacy and Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department has already launched the follow<strong>in</strong>g six programmes <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

Four projects have been launched dur<strong>in</strong>g current year <strong>in</strong> pursuance <strong>of</strong> declaration <strong>of</strong> 2010 as<br />

National Year <strong>of</strong> Literacy<br />

• Literacy Program<br />

• Campaign for Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Literacy <strong>in</strong> Four Districts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

• <strong>Punjab</strong> Literacy and Livelihood Programme<br />

• Establishment <strong>of</strong> 300 Adult Literacy Centers and 200 NFBE Schools at Brick Kilns<br />

• Community Learn<strong>in</strong>g Centers Project<br />

• Capacity Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Literacy & Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Department<br />

There is political will and resource mobilization <strong>in</strong> place and now is the time for<br />

implementation and Literacy and Non Formal <strong>Education</strong> Department is charged with the<br />

responsibility to achieve the stated statutory goals by optimally employ<strong>in</strong>g all the<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional potentialities at its command. The total area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce is<br />

2,05,344Sq Km, with the average population density <strong>of</strong> 441 persons per Sq Km. The<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce is adm<strong>in</strong>istratively divided <strong>in</strong>to 9 Divisions, 36 districts and 144 Tehsils. <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

is the largest prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> Pakistan with respect to population. The total estimated<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> 2010 is 91 million.<br />

Table 76: Estimated Population Male/ Female age-group wise 49 as <strong>in</strong> 2009 (<strong>in</strong> Millions)<br />

Age-group Male Female Total<br />

0-4 5.1 4.7 9.8<br />

5-9 5.1 4.7 9.8<br />

10-14 5.5 5.1 10.6<br />

15-19 5.4 5.0 10.4<br />

20-24 4.9 4.7 9.6<br />

10+ 36.7 34.6 71.3<br />

Source: National Institute <strong>of</strong> Population Studies<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> pre-dom<strong>in</strong>antly is agrarian <strong>in</strong> nature with majority <strong>of</strong> the population liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural<br />

areas. Most <strong>of</strong> the people tend to follow Islamic value system, culture and traditions.<br />

However, strong biradari system plays a significant role <strong>in</strong> social and other socio-cultural<br />

49 Estimated by National Institute <strong>of</strong> Population Studies<br />

108


traditions <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Agriculture cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be a larger sector <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>’s<br />

economy with wheat and cotton be<strong>in</strong>g the major crops. <strong>Punjab</strong> contributes about 68% to<br />

annual food gra<strong>in</strong> production <strong>in</strong> the country. It is simultaneously the most <strong>in</strong>dustrialized<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> Pakistan. The prov<strong>in</strong>ce has always contributed the most to the national<br />

economy <strong>of</strong> Pakistan. Its share to GDP <strong>of</strong> Pakistan has historically ranged from 51.8% to<br />

54.7%. It makes significant contribution <strong>in</strong> the service and agriculture sectors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economy, with its share rang<strong>in</strong>g from 52.1% to 64.5% <strong>in</strong> the service sector and 56.1% to<br />

61.5% <strong>in</strong> the agriculture sector. <strong>Punjab</strong> appears to be better placed than other prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> targets relat<strong>in</strong>g to universal primary education and <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

higher literacy rate. Its Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) and Net Enrolment Ratio (NER)<br />

are better than other prov<strong>in</strong>ces, which directly contribute towards improvement <strong>of</strong> its<br />

socio-economic conditions.<br />

Even with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, districts hav<strong>in</strong>g higher GER/NER at primary level have higher<br />

literacy rate and correspond<strong>in</strong>gly improved socio-economic <strong>in</strong>dicators. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey (MICS), number <strong>of</strong> illiterates <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong> year 2007-<br />

08 was approximately 34 million, which is estimated to have <strong>in</strong>creased to 38 million <strong>in</strong><br />

the year 2010-11. MICS survey portrays that more than half (59%) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

population above 10 years is literate, with a clear, sharp differential between males (69%)<br />

and females (50%). Nevertheless, the surveys shows an improvement <strong>in</strong> overall 10+ years<br />

literacy compared to the <strong>Punjab</strong> MICS 2003-04 which reported 54% amongst all 10+<br />

year-olds: 63 % amongst males and 44 % amongst females. Literacy (10+ years) varies<br />

considerably between urban and rural areas, with about half (52%) <strong>of</strong> rural-dwellers<br />

literate compared to 77% <strong>in</strong> major cities and 72 % <strong>in</strong> other urban areas. Gender<br />

disparities also exist by area <strong>of</strong> residence. In rural areas 64 % males are literate compared<br />

to only 40% females. The gender gap is slightly narrower <strong>in</strong> major cities (males 81 %;<br />

females 74%) and <strong>in</strong> other urban areas (males 78%; females 65%). Literacy amongst<br />

people over 10 years <strong>of</strong> age <strong>in</strong>creases where the older population is less literate than the<br />

younger. While there is the expected positive correlation with education, <strong>of</strong> those who<br />

have never attended school (47% <strong>of</strong> the 10+ population), 37% reported that they are<br />

literate. Besides gender disparities there are obvious urban/rural disparities <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

literacy levels and access to educational facilities. A comb<strong>in</strong>ed picture <strong>of</strong> rural urban and<br />

male female literacy levels <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is provided <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g matrix:<br />

Historically, there has been a cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> illiterates (especially<br />

females), despite the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g literacy rates over the years. This is primarily because <strong>of</strong><br />

higher rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> population and not stopp<strong>in</strong>g illiterates’ entry from the source<br />

i.e. not provid<strong>in</strong>g quality education to kids at Primary level <strong>in</strong> formal school system<br />

which results <strong>in</strong> early drop out prior to complet<strong>in</strong>g primary education cycle. Estimated<br />

population <strong>of</strong> 5-9 years age-group <strong>in</strong> 2009 by NIPS was 9.8 million <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 4.7 million<br />

girls. On the basis <strong>of</strong> past trend <strong>of</strong> Net Enrolment Rate (NER) at primary stage, it has<br />

been estimated that 3.41 million kids (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 1.80 million girls) <strong>of</strong> 5-9 year age-group<br />

were out <strong>of</strong> school.<br />

Tables above do not pa<strong>in</strong>t a very rosy picture about the situation <strong>of</strong> literacy <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

109


which calls for <strong>in</strong>terventions aimed at improv<strong>in</strong>g the situation on war foot<strong>in</strong>g. The most<br />

important <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> so far is the establishment <strong>of</strong> Literacy and<br />

Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Department (L&NFBED).After a comprehensive exercise<br />

the detail <strong>of</strong> which has been given <strong>in</strong> 5 years Strategic Plan <strong>of</strong> the Literacy Department,<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g requirements have been calculated to achieve 88% Adult Literacy rate and to<br />

literate the 33% annual dropouts <strong>of</strong> formal school<strong>in</strong>g system, till 2015. The needs, target<br />

groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2.12.<br />

a. Detail <strong>of</strong> required number <strong>of</strong> ALCs and Cost<br />

110<br />

1. No <strong>of</strong> Target Adult Literacy Centers ( 5 years) 300,674 ALCs<br />

2. Estimated Cost per annum Rs 87000<br />

3. Total Cost <strong>of</strong> 300674 ALCs <strong>in</strong> five years 87240x300674=<br />

Rs 26.23 billion<br />

4. Cost per annum=26231/5 Rs.52. 46 billion<br />

5. Cost per learner Rs 290<br />

6. Cost per month 290x25=Rs.7250<br />

b. Detail <strong>of</strong> required number <strong>of</strong> NFBES and Cost<br />

1. No <strong>of</strong> Target Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Schools ( 5 years) 122,124 NFBES<br />

2. Estimated Cost per annum Rs.80000<br />

3. Total Cost <strong>of</strong> 122,124 NFBES(5 years) 80,000x122,124=<br />

Rs. 97. 70 billion<br />

4. Cost per annum 9770/5=Rs.1.95 billion<br />

5. Cost per learner per month Rs. 267<br />

6. Cost per month 267x25=Rs.6675<br />

Source: Literacy and Non Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Department 2010-2011, Five Year Strategic Plan<br />

In order to achieve the MDGs the Department has launched the follow<strong>in</strong>g pilot projects<br />

and striv<strong>in</strong>g to upscale the scope <strong>of</strong> these projects. However, achievement <strong>of</strong> these targets<br />

is subject to provision <strong>of</strong> funds.<br />

1. Literacy Programme (LP)<br />

• Total cost <strong>of</strong> the revised PC-I Rs. 1754.130 million<br />

• Six years (72 months) duration.<br />

• Be<strong>in</strong>g implemented <strong>in</strong> 32 districts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

• The districts not covered under the Project Khanewal, Khushab, D.G. Khan, &<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong>.<br />

• 10 Union Councils (UCs) selected <strong>in</strong> each district<br />

• Target 200 NFBE Centres and 200 ALCs <strong>in</strong> every district.<br />

2. Campaign for Enhancement <strong>of</strong> Literacy <strong>in</strong> 4 Districts<br />

• Be<strong>in</strong>g implemented <strong>in</strong> four namely Khanewal, Khushab, Dera Ghazi Khan and<br />

Mandi Bahaudd<strong>in</strong>.<br />

• Sett<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>of</strong> 630 new NFBE schools <strong>in</strong> four districts<br />

• Total capital cost <strong>of</strong> the revised PC-I is estimated at Rs.720.809 million.


111<br />

• Orig<strong>in</strong>al project duration was 2004-05 to 2007-08. Project has been revised to be<br />

completed till 2013-14.<br />

3. <strong>Punjab</strong> Literacy and Livelihood Programme<br />

• Envisages impart<strong>in</strong>g basic literacy and vocational skills to illiterates and explores<br />

<strong>in</strong>novative models to <strong>in</strong>centivize adult literacy <strong>in</strong>itiatives.<br />

• Cost: Rs. 135.713 Million.<br />

• Total duration <strong>of</strong> the project is 2 years (from 2009-10 to 2010-11) and it shall be<br />

executed <strong>in</strong> Multan and D.G Khan Division.<br />

4. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Adult Literacy Centres & NFBE Schools at brick Kilns <strong>in</strong> Multan<br />

and Khanewal<br />

• Focuses on access to quality literacy to illiterates and out <strong>of</strong> school population <strong>of</strong> all<br />

ages at Brick Kilns.<br />

• Cost Rs. 109.884 Million.<br />

• Total duration <strong>of</strong> the project 5 years<br />

• To be executed <strong>in</strong> Multan and Khanewal.<br />

5. Establishment <strong>of</strong> 360 CLCs/ Literacy Resource Centres - 10 <strong>in</strong> each District<br />

• Concept is to set up 10 community learn<strong>in</strong>g centres <strong>in</strong> each district to provide<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutionalized support through community participation towards improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life and economic self-reliance.<br />

• Cost: Rs. 38.163 Million.<br />

• Total duration <strong>of</strong> the project: 2 years (from 2009-10 to 2010-11)<br />

• Pilot Project to be executed <strong>in</strong> Sahiwal Division.<br />

6. Capacity Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />

• General objectives <strong>of</strong> the project:<br />

• To enhance the capacity <strong>of</strong> Literacy Department,<br />

• To strengthen the exist<strong>in</strong>g functions <strong>of</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Admn W<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

• To add the vital and miss<strong>in</strong>g functions <strong>of</strong> R&D, M&E and HRD.<br />

• The project is approved at a cost <strong>of</strong> Rs. 48.801 Million.<br />

• Total duration <strong>of</strong> the project is 2 years (from 2009-10 to 2011).<br />

3.9.7: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

There are a variations <strong>in</strong> literacy rate <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> i.e. 80% literacy rate <strong>in</strong> Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di<br />

District be<strong>in</strong>g the highest whereas it is 33% <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Rajanpur District be<strong>in</strong>g the lowest.<br />

The problem is further aggravated once we focus on rural and urban areas as well as<br />

literacy rates for male and female. With<strong>in</strong> districts, there are sever disparities <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

male and female literacy rate. While the overall youth literacy rate is 73 %, amongst<br />

males it is 79 % and amongst females 68 %. Gender disparities exist <strong>in</strong> areas <strong>of</strong><br />

residence, so 76 % <strong>of</strong> rural males are literate compared to 58 % <strong>of</strong> rural females. The<br />

younger population, aged 15-19, is slightly less literate than those aged 20-24: amongst<br />

males, 80 % compared to 78 %, and amongst females 70 % compared to 66%. The<br />

highest wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile has the highest youth literacy rate, especially amongst


women and girls: amongst males, the highest wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile has a literacy rate <strong>of</strong><br />

94 % compared to 52 % <strong>in</strong> the lowest and amongst females 95 % compared to 19 %.<br />

Literacy rates <strong>of</strong> household members above 15 years <strong>of</strong> age is more than half (56 %) <strong>of</strong><br />

whom are literate. Amongst males, the literacy rate at 66% is 21% higher than amongst<br />

females (45 %). The needs, target groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix<br />

<strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2<br />

3.10 : Deeni Madaris<br />

3.10.1: <strong>Policy</strong><br />

NEP 2009 envisages that Federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments shall develop jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

strategies with ma<strong>in</strong> Madrasah systems, through consultations. NEP 2009 advised to<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduce formal subjects <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g market-oriented and skills-based subjects that would<br />

enable the children graduat<strong>in</strong>g from Deeni Madaris to have more employment options.<br />

The policy requires that arrangements shall be made for pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> rare books on Islam,<br />

charts and materials relat<strong>in</strong>g to Islamic <strong>in</strong>junctions and their distribution amongst<br />

libraries <strong>of</strong> schools, colleges, universities, research <strong>in</strong>stitutions and Deeni Madaris.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to NEP 2009, it shall be ensured that textual and other learn<strong>in</strong>g materials do<br />

not conta<strong>in</strong> anyth<strong>in</strong>g repugnant to Islamic <strong>in</strong>junctions and controversial material<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st any sect or religious/ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to policy, provision shall be<br />

made for teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the subject <strong>of</strong> Ethics/Moral <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> lieu <strong>of</strong> Islamiyat to non-<br />

Muslim children and subject specific teachers shall be appo<strong>in</strong>ted accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

requirements.<br />

The Institutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>al Research <strong>in</strong> Universities <strong>in</strong> collaboration with Departments<br />

<strong>of</strong> Islamic Studies shall commission research on Islamiyat Curriculum and recommend<br />

strategies for mak<strong>in</strong>g it more relevant to the needs <strong>of</strong> the ever chang<strong>in</strong>g society. Deeni<br />

Madaris shall be ma<strong>in</strong>streamed by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g contemporary studies alongside the<br />

curricula <strong>of</strong> Deeni Madaris to enhance prospects <strong>of</strong> their students to pursue higher<br />

studies, research and excellence and to ensure employment, recognition and equivalence.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to NEP 2009, Madrasah <strong>Education</strong> authority shall be established by M<strong>in</strong>istry<br />

<strong>of</strong> Interior with the mandate to provide an opportunity for all exist<strong>in</strong>g and future Madras<br />

to excel and enhance the services. Governments should provide funds for education and<br />

socio-economic welfare <strong>of</strong> students and also provide <strong>in</strong>frastructure and equipment for<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities. The policy gives guidel<strong>in</strong>es to provide further tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

to enhance skills <strong>of</strong> teachers and provide support <strong>in</strong> vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to equip students<br />

to generate <strong>in</strong>come. Government shall provide advice and assistance <strong>in</strong> streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

policies, objectives and syllabi to give graduates a competitive edge <strong>in</strong> the job<br />

market and for placement <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> higher education. Deeni Madrassas form a<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the private sector. The parallel system <strong>in</strong> this case consists <strong>of</strong> a curriculum<br />

that lies outside the ma<strong>in</strong>stream.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the policy, there is another divide between the curriculum that is <strong>of</strong>fered to<br />

the children enrolled <strong>in</strong> Deeni Madaris and the curriculum <strong>in</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

and private establishments. The third tier <strong>of</strong> Madrassas plays a role <strong>in</strong> a different type <strong>of</strong><br />

112


social divide. Young children educated <strong>in</strong> Madrassas normally do not have skills<br />

that enable them to seek employment outside the realm <strong>of</strong> duties associated with<br />

clerics. This <strong>in</strong>creases social tensions because <strong>of</strong> the sense <strong>of</strong> exclusion among children<br />

educated <strong>in</strong> these <strong>in</strong>stitutions. The state shall provide greater opportunities to the citizens<br />

and areas that have been largely excluded from the ma<strong>in</strong>stream development and<br />

participation <strong>in</strong> the national processes by ensur<strong>in</strong>g even and equitable human<br />

development across. Pakistan. Governments shall identify schools <strong>in</strong> less developed areas<br />

for prioritization <strong>in</strong> resource allocation and management for improv<strong>in</strong>g quality.<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> consultation with Prov<strong>in</strong>cial and Area education departments,<br />

relevant pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies and the wider public, shall develop a comprehensive plan <strong>of</strong><br />

action for implement<strong>in</strong>g the English language policy <strong>in</strong> the shortest possible time, pay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

particular attention to disadvantaged groups and lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d regions. The curriculum<br />

from Class I onward shall <strong>in</strong>clude English (as a subject), Urdu, one regional language,<br />

mathematics along with an <strong>in</strong>tegrated subject. The Prov<strong>in</strong>cial and Area <strong>Education</strong><br />

Departments shall have the choice to select the medium <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction up to Class V.<br />

English shall be employed as the medium <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction for sciences and<br />

mathematics from class IV onwards. For 5 years Prov<strong>in</strong>ces shall have the option to teach<br />

mathematics and science <strong>in</strong> English or Urdu/ <strong>of</strong>ficial regional language, but after five<br />

years the teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> these subjects shall be <strong>in</strong> English only. Opportunities shall be<br />

provided to children from low socio-economic strata to learn English language.<br />

3.10.2: Comprehensive <strong>Policy</strong> for Deeni Madaris<br />

A comprehensive school language policy shall be developed <strong>in</strong> consultation with<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial and area governments and other stakeholders. Federal, prov<strong>in</strong>cial and area<br />

governments shall develop jo<strong>in</strong>t strategies with ma<strong>in</strong> Madrasah systems, through<br />

consultations, to <strong>in</strong>troduce formal subjects <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g market-oriented and skills-based<br />

subjects that would enable the children graduat<strong>in</strong>g from Deeni Madaris to have more<br />

employment options. The follow<strong>in</strong>g tables <strong>in</strong>dicate countrywide enrollment <strong>of</strong> Madrasah,<br />

and enrolled children <strong>in</strong> three districts surveyed by LEAPS 2003 <strong>in</strong> Attock, Faisalabad<br />

and Rahim Yar Khan. The table also <strong>in</strong>dicates the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the households.<br />

Table 77: Country-Wide Madrassas Enrollment –Different Sources 50<br />

Data Source Madrassas Enrollment Madrassas as Fraction <strong>of</strong> Enrolled<br />

Census <strong>of</strong> Population,1998<br />

Total Male Female 159,225<br />

111,085<br />

48,140<br />

0.70%<br />

0.82%<br />

0.53%<br />

50<br />

The census <strong>of</strong> population covers all <strong>of</strong> Pakistan except the Federally Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Tribal Area (FATA). Included<br />

are <strong>Punjab</strong>, Baluchistan, North-West Frontier Prov<strong>in</strong>ces (NWFP) and S<strong>in</strong>dh, plus the federal capital <strong>Islamabad</strong> and<br />

the federally adm<strong>in</strong>istered Northern Areas and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK). The Census <strong>of</strong> Population, 1998<br />

estimates is based on the census “long-form”, which was adm<strong>in</strong>istered on a sample basis to a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

households. This data is representative at the district level for both rural and urban regions. The next three rows<br />

show estimates from the Pakistan Integrated Household Survey (PIHS) which is a household survey and is<br />

representative only at the prov<strong>in</strong>cial level for the four ma<strong>in</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ces, which account for 97% <strong>of</strong> the country’s<br />

population-<strong>Punjab</strong>, S<strong>in</strong>dh, Baluchistan and NWFP.<br />

113


PIHS1991 151,546 0.78% [0.16%]<br />

PIHS1998 178,436 0.74% [0.089%]<br />

PIHS2001 176,061 0.7% [0.093%]<br />

Source: LEAPS, 2003. Population Census1998<br />

Table 78: Enrolled Children <strong>in</strong> Three Districts 51<br />

School Type Data Source Attock Faisalabad Rahim Yar Khan<br />

Government (%) LEAPS 67.73 71.96 71.38<br />

Private (%) LEAPS 31.56 27.33 24.92<br />

Madrassas (%) LEAPS 0.71 0.70 3.70<br />

Population Census,1998 0.50 0.49 1.03<br />

Source: LEAPS, 2003. Population Census 1998<br />

Table 79: Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Madrassa and Non-Madrassa Households 52<br />

House hold Type<br />

House hold<br />

Head Illiterate<br />

Monthly<br />

Expenditure<br />

Under Rs.7500<br />

No Land<br />

Settlement Has<br />

Private School<br />

Non-Madrasah House hold 0.4469<br />

(0.0024)<br />

0.9598<br />

(0.0009)<br />

0.6171<br />

(0.0023)<br />

0.7196 (0.0021)<br />

Madrasah House hold 0.5159<br />

(0.0153)<br />

0.9645<br />

(0.0056)<br />

0.6047<br />

(0.0149)<br />

0.4852 (0.0152)<br />

Source: LEAPS, 2003.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> Madrasah all over Pakistan is around 28, 982. The number was 2861 <strong>in</strong><br />

1988 and 246 <strong>in</strong> 1947 53 . The <strong>in</strong>terior m<strong>in</strong>istry estimates put the number <strong>of</strong> Madrassas at<br />

20,000 with 3 million students. Out <strong>of</strong> these 11,000 Madrassas belong to Deobandi<br />

sector54. The number <strong>of</strong> Deobandi Madrassas <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is around 2512. The Divisionwise<br />

breakup is: Lahore 323, Gujranwala 140, Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di 169, Faisalabad 112, Sargodha<br />

149, Multan 325, D.G.Khan 411 and Bahawalpur 88355. The number <strong>of</strong> religious<br />

Madrasah is the highest <strong>in</strong> the Southern <strong>Punjab</strong> and there is meteoric rise <strong>in</strong> the numbers<br />

over the years. In terms <strong>of</strong> needs and priorities there is a dire and <strong>in</strong>cessant demand for<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> NEP 2009 and Federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments shall develop jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

strategies with ma<strong>in</strong> Madrasah systems, through consultations.<br />

51<br />

LEAPS reports school type for enrolled children ages 5 – 15 Population Census reports field <strong>of</strong> education for<br />

children 5-14. LEAPS sample villages were randomly drawn from a list-frame <strong>of</strong> rural villages with at least one<br />

private school and thus are not representative <strong>of</strong> the district as a whole.<br />

52<br />

Standard error reported <strong>in</strong> parenthesis. Households are classified as “Madrasah Households” if one or more children<br />

are currently enrolled <strong>in</strong> a Madrasah. “Non-Madrasah” households have at least one child enrolled <strong>in</strong> government or<br />

private school. Monthly expenditure under Rs.7500 accounts for 97% <strong>of</strong> households. There is no difference <strong>in</strong><br />

means between household types when a more even expenditure categorization is used.<br />

53<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, Government <strong>of</strong> Pakistan 2003. Directory <strong>of</strong> Deeni Madaris <strong>in</strong> Pakistan 2003. Curriculum<br />

w<strong>in</strong>g (Islamic <strong>Education</strong> Center) M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

54<br />

Rehman, Tariq. 2004. “The Madrasah and the State <strong>of</strong> Pakistan: Religion, Poverty and the Potential for<br />

Violence <strong>in</strong> Pakistan).<br />

55<br />

Rehman, Tariq. 2004. “The Madrasah and the State <strong>of</strong> Pakistan: Religion, Poverty and the Potential for<br />

Violence <strong>in</strong> Pakistan).<br />

114


3.10.3: Needs, Target Groups, Strategies and Way Forward<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> should <strong>in</strong>troduce formal subjects <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g market-oriented<br />

and skills-based subjects that would enable the children graduat<strong>in</strong>g from Deeni Madaris<br />

to have more employment options. Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> shall make arrangements for<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> rare books on Islam, charts and materials relat<strong>in</strong>g to Islamic <strong>in</strong>junctions and<br />

their distribution amongst libraries <strong>of</strong> schools, colleges, universities, research <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

and Deeni Madaris. The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> shall ensure that textual and other learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

materials do not conta<strong>in</strong> anyth<strong>in</strong>g repugnant to Islamic <strong>in</strong>junctions and controversial<br />

material aga<strong>in</strong>st any sect. The matter <strong>of</strong> Deeni Madaris is volatile and needs to be handled<br />

carefully keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the experiences <strong>of</strong> abrupt policy <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> the past. The<br />

Madrasah reform programme can only be successful once all the stakeholders have<br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> the reform agenda and dur<strong>in</strong>g the process <strong>of</strong> implementation, everybody is on<br />

board. The gradual and consistent reform process will deliver dividends. The needs, target<br />

groups and strategies have been elucidated <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 <strong>in</strong> Section 7.2.<br />

115


Chapter-4: Pakistan and the International Commitments (EFA/MDGs):<br />

Achievements and Shortfalls<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has declared education as its first priority. Government is<br />

endeavor<strong>in</strong>g for the improvement <strong>of</strong> education sector through policies and programs and the<br />

most recent <strong>in</strong>itiative is <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap Reform Program.<br />

4.1: MDG and EFA Goals: Degree <strong>of</strong> Progress Achieved<br />

The present status <strong>of</strong> Pakistan <strong>in</strong> the EFA Development Index (EFI: 2008) is not very<br />

encourag<strong>in</strong>g. Of the 127 countries assessed, Pakistan has a rank <strong>of</strong> 119, with only eight<br />

countries below it. In particular, it falls very low (ranked 123) <strong>in</strong> net primary enrolment rate.<br />

Table 80: Rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Selected Countries on the EFA Development Index<br />

116<br />

EDI<br />

Net Enrolment<br />

Rate (Primary)<br />

Adult Literacy<br />

(15+)<br />

Gender-specific<br />

EFA Index (GEI)<br />

Survival rate<br />

till Grade 5.<br />

Bangladesh 112 100 115 95 121<br />

India 107 61 111 108 114<br />

Pakistan 119 123 118 119 111<br />

Japan 1 1 28 1 19<br />

Switzerland 7 21 1 36 19<br />

UAE 46 27 76 25 1<br />

Source: EFA Global Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Report 2011; <strong>UNESCO</strong><br />

4.2: Millennium Development Goals<br />

The MDG goals were developed out <strong>of</strong> the eight chapters <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, signed <strong>in</strong><br />

September 2000. There are eight goals with 21 targets,[10] and a series <strong>of</strong> measurable<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators for each target.<br />

Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger<br />

Target 1A: Halve the proportion <strong>of</strong> people liv<strong>in</strong>g on less than $1 a day<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> population below $1 per day (PPP values)<br />

• Poverty gap ratio [<strong>in</strong>cidence x depth <strong>of</strong> poverty]<br />

• Share <strong>of</strong> poorest qu<strong>in</strong>tile <strong>in</strong> national consumption<br />

Target 1B: Achieve Decent Employment for Women, Men, and Young People<br />

• GDP Growth per Employed Person<br />

• Employment Rate<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> employed population below $1 per day (PPP values)<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> family-based workers <strong>in</strong> employed population<br />

• Target 1C: Halve the proportion <strong>of</strong> people who suffer from hunger<br />

• Prevalence <strong>of</strong> underweight children under five years <strong>of</strong> age


• Proportion <strong>of</strong> population below m<strong>in</strong>imum level <strong>of</strong> dietary energy<br />

consumption<br />

Goal 2: Achieve Universal Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Target 2A: By 2015, all children can complete a full course <strong>of</strong> primary school<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

girls and boys<br />

• Enrollment <strong>in</strong> primary education<br />

• Completion <strong>of</strong> primary education<br />

• Literacy <strong>of</strong> 15-24 year olds, female and male<br />

Goal 3: Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women<br />

Target 3A: Elim<strong>in</strong>ate gender disparity <strong>in</strong> primary and secondary education<br />

preferably by 2005, and at all levels by 2015<br />

• Ratios <strong>of</strong> girls to boys <strong>in</strong> primary, secondary and tertiary education<br />

• Share <strong>of</strong> women <strong>in</strong> wage employment <strong>in</strong> the non-agricultural sector<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> seats held by women <strong>in</strong> national parliament<br />

Goal 4: Reduce Child Mortality Rates<br />

Target 4A: Reduce by two-thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality<br />

rate<br />

• Under-five mortality rate<br />

• Infant (under 1) mortality rate<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> 1-year-old children immunized aga<strong>in</strong>st measles<br />

Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health<br />

Target 5A: Reduce by three quarters, between 1990 and 2015, the maternal mortality<br />

ratio<br />

• Maternal mortality ratio<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> births attended by skilled health personnel<br />

117<br />

Target 5B: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health<br />

• Contraceptive prevalence rate<br />

• Adolescent birth rate<br />

• Antenatal care coverage<br />

• Unmet need for family plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria, and Other Diseases<br />

Target 6A: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

• HIV prevalence among population aged 15–24 years<br />

• Condom use at last high-risk sex<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> population aged 15–24 years with comprehensive correct<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

Target 6B: Achieve, by 2010, universal access to treatment for HIV/AIDS for all<br />

those who need it<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> population with advanced HIV <strong>in</strong>fection with access to<br />

antiretroviral drugs


Target 6C: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> malaria and<br />

other major diseases<br />

• Prevalence and death rates associated with malaria<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> children under 5 sleep<strong>in</strong>g under <strong>in</strong>secticide-treated bed nets<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> children under 5 with fever who are treated with appropriate<br />

anti-malarial drugs<br />

• Prevalence and death rates associated with tuberculosis<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis cases detected and cured under DOTS (Directly<br />

Observed Treatment Short Course)<br />

Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

Target 7A: Integrate the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able development <strong>in</strong>to country policies<br />

and programs; reverse loss <strong>of</strong> environmental resources<br />

Target 7B: Reduce biodiversity loss, achiev<strong>in</strong>g, by 2010, a significant reduction <strong>in</strong><br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> loss<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> land area covered by forest<br />

• CO2 emissions, total, per capita and per $1 GDP (PPP)<br />

• Consumption <strong>of</strong> ozone-deplet<strong>in</strong>g substances<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> fish stocks with<strong>in</strong> safe biological limits<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> total water resources used<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> terrestrial and mar<strong>in</strong>e areas protected<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> species threatened with ext<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

118<br />

Target 7C: Halve, by 2015, the proportion <strong>of</strong> the population without susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

access to safe dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water and basic sanitation (for more <strong>in</strong>formation see the entry<br />

on water supply)<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> population with susta<strong>in</strong>able access to an improved water<br />

source, urban and rural<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> urban population with access to improved sanitation<br />

Target 7D: By 2020, to have achieved a significant improvement <strong>in</strong> the lives <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least 100 million slum-dwellers<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> urban population liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> slums<br />

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development<br />

Target 8A: Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, non-discrim<strong>in</strong>atory<br />

trad<strong>in</strong>g and f<strong>in</strong>ancial system<br />

• Includes a commitment to good governance, development, and poverty<br />

reduction – both nationally and <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />

Target 8B: Address the Special Needs <strong>of</strong> the Least Developed Countries (LDC)<br />

• Includes: tariff and quota free access for LDC exports; enhanced programme<br />

<strong>of</strong> debt relief for HIPC and cancellation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial bilateral debt; and more<br />

generous ODA (Overseas Development Assistance) for countries committed<br />

to poverty reduction


119<br />

Target 8C: Address the special needs <strong>of</strong> landlocked develop<strong>in</strong>g countries and Small<br />

Island develop<strong>in</strong>g States<br />

• Through the Programme <strong>of</strong> Action for the Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development <strong>of</strong> Small<br />

Island Develop<strong>in</strong>g States and the outcome <strong>of</strong> the twenty-second special<br />

session <strong>of</strong> the General Assembly<br />

Target 8D: Deal comprehensively with the debt problems <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

through national and <strong>in</strong>ternational measures <strong>in</strong> order to make debt susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>in</strong> the<br />

long term<br />

• Some <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dicators listed below are monitored separately for the Least<br />

Developed Countries (LDCs), Africa, landlocked develop<strong>in</strong>g countries and<br />

Small Island develop<strong>in</strong>g States.<br />

• Official Development Assistance (ODA):<br />

• Net ODA, total and to LDCs, as percentage <strong>of</strong> OECD/DAC donors’<br />

Gross National Income (GNI)<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> total sector-allocable ODA <strong>of</strong> OECD/DAC donors to<br />

basic social services (basic education, primary health care, nutrition,<br />

safe water and sanitation)<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> bilateral ODA <strong>of</strong> OECD/DAC donors that is untied<br />

• ODA received <strong>in</strong> landlocked countries as proportion <strong>of</strong> their GNIs<br />

• ODA received <strong>in</strong> small island develop<strong>in</strong>g States as proportion <strong>of</strong> their<br />

GNIs<br />

• Market access:<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> total developed country imports (by value and<br />

exclud<strong>in</strong>g arms) from develop<strong>in</strong>g countries and from LDCs, admitted<br />

free <strong>of</strong> duty<br />

• Average tariffs imposed by developed countries on agricultural<br />

products and textiles and cloth<strong>in</strong>g from develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

• Agricultural support estimate for OECD countries as percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

their GDP<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> ODA provided to help build trade capacity<br />

• Debt susta<strong>in</strong>ability:<br />

• Total number <strong>of</strong> countries that have reached their HIPC decision<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts and number that have reached their HIPC completion po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

(cumulative)<br />

• Debt relief committed under HIPC <strong>in</strong>itiative, US$<br />

• Debt service as a percentage <strong>of</strong> exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services<br />

Target 8E: In co-operation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to<br />

affordable, essential drugs <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

• Proportion <strong>of</strong> population with access to affordable essential drugs on a<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able basis<br />

Target 8F: In co-operation with the private sector, make available the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

new technologies, especially <strong>in</strong>formation and communications<br />

• Telephone l<strong>in</strong>es and cellular subscribers per 100 population<br />

• Personal computers <strong>in</strong> use per 100 population<br />

• Internet users per 100 Population


4.3: <strong>Education</strong> For All Goals<br />

Six <strong>in</strong>ternationally agreed education goals aim to meet the learn<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>of</strong> all children,<br />

youth and adults by 2015.<br />

Goal 1: Expand<strong>in</strong>g and improv<strong>in</strong>g comprehensive early childhood care and education,<br />

especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children<br />

Goal 2: Ensur<strong>in</strong>g that by 2015 all children, particularly girls, children <strong>in</strong> difficult<br />

circumstances and those belong<strong>in</strong>g to ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities, have access to, and<br />

Goal 3:<br />

complete, free and compulsory primary education <strong>of</strong> good quality.<br />

Ensur<strong>in</strong>g that the learn<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>of</strong> all young people and adults are met through<br />

equitable access to appropriate learn<strong>in</strong>g and life-skills programmes<br />

Goal 4: Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a 50 per cent improvement <strong>in</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> adult literacy by 2015,<br />

especially for women, and equitable access to basic and cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g education for<br />

all adults.<br />

Goal 5:<br />

Goal 6:<br />

Elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g gender disparities <strong>in</strong> primary and secondary education by 2005, and<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g gender equality <strong>in</strong> education by 2015, with a focus on ensur<strong>in</strong>g girls’<br />

full and equal access to and achievement <strong>in</strong> basic education <strong>of</strong> good quality.<br />

Improv<strong>in</strong>g all aspects <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> education and ensur<strong>in</strong>g excellence <strong>of</strong> all<br />

so that recognized and measurable learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes are achieved by all,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> literacy, numeracy and essential life skills.<br />

Given the high level <strong>of</strong> similarity between the EFA goals and education MDGs - EFA goals<br />

can be termed as a sub-set <strong>of</strong> MDGs. MDGs represent a broader spectrum <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

poverty, employment, health, environment, gender equality, child mortality, combat<br />

HIV/AIDs and environment etc. The progress so far achieved <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational commitments to education can be assessed by review<strong>in</strong>g the change which may<br />

have taken place <strong>in</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> common <strong>in</strong>dicators. The follow<strong>in</strong>g are common <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong><br />

MDG and EFA goals:<br />

1. Net primary enrolment rates<br />

2. Completion/Survival Rates<br />

3. Adult Literacy Rates<br />

4. Gender Parity <strong>in</strong> Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

5. Gender Parity <strong>in</strong> Secondary <strong>Education</strong><br />

6. Youth (15-24 years old) Literacy Gender Parity<br />

4.4: Projections to Reach MDG/EFA Goals<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> is at serious risk <strong>of</strong> not achiev<strong>in</strong>g adult literacy rates accord<strong>in</strong>g to MDG & EFA<br />

Goals. In case <strong>of</strong> female adult literacy rate, the situation is dismal. Chapter 2 Sections<br />

2.7-2.12 describe achievable targets with affordable costs aga<strong>in</strong>st a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g population, enrolment, number <strong>of</strong> teachers, number <strong>of</strong> schools,<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure, basic facilities, unit cost per student, unit cost for pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development, etc. Projections <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2 have been made on the basis <strong>of</strong> NIPS data,<br />

which <strong>in</strong>dicates an annual <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> more than 300,000 (approx.) populations between<br />

120


5-9 years <strong>of</strong> age group 56 . Currently, enrollment rate <strong>of</strong> 5-9 years exclud<strong>in</strong>g katchi class is<br />

62% (PSLM 2010-11). Projections are made to achieve the 98% enrollment <strong>of</strong> 5-16 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> population by 2024-25. In this case, the projected budget for education has to be<br />

enhanced to an annual average <strong>of</strong> 15% to achieve the target <strong>in</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g 15 years. With<br />

15% average annual <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education budget, <strong>Punjab</strong> can achieve 98% Net<br />

Enrollment Rate (5-16 years age group) till 2024-25. The costs <strong>of</strong> textbooks, school<br />

councils, and stipends would <strong>in</strong>crease due to provision <strong>of</strong> stipends and free textbooks to<br />

more students. It is assumed that ow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> salary cost and number <strong>of</strong> teachers,<br />

projections would elevate the unit cost per child per year to the level <strong>of</strong> Rs.16, 078.40 by<br />

2024-25. However at the present pace <strong>of</strong> progression NER, GPI, Completion rate and<br />

Adult Youth Literacy have been worked out on the basis <strong>of</strong> data, PIHS 2001, PMIU-<br />

PESRP 2004/2011 and <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011.<br />

4.5: Net Primary Enrolment Rates<br />

In Chapter 2 Sections 2.7-2.12, NER has been calculated. To accommodate additional<br />

enrollment and out-<strong>of</strong>-school children, more classrooms and schools would be required.<br />

By tak<strong>in</strong>g 2009-10 as a base year, projection <strong>in</strong>dicates that 263,184 additional classrooms<br />

and 5815 additional schools would be required by 2024-25 to adjust more students <strong>in</strong> the<br />

classrooms. There is also a need to reduce classroom-students ratio to 1:40 <strong>in</strong> the next 15<br />

years, which is currently 1:44. Unit cost is Rs.2.5 million for construct<strong>in</strong>g a build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

primary school, Rs.5.01 million for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> primary to middle school, and Rs.5<br />

million for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> middle to secondary school. Projection has been worked out<br />

for provision <strong>of</strong> basic facilities <strong>in</strong> all those schools, which are without basic facilities,<br />

with an estimated cost <strong>of</strong> Rs.11.67 billion by year 2012-13. There is a direct proportion<br />

between enrolment rate and teacher demand, as <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> enrollment <strong>of</strong> children would<br />

result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased demand for teachers. However, availability, recruitment, and<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> such a huge human resource <strong>in</strong> itself are serious challenges for the<br />

government. Therefore, for compliance with 25-A <strong>in</strong> view <strong>of</strong> government service ratio,<br />

144,865 additional teachers would be required to br<strong>in</strong>g the student-teacher ratio at 40:1 <strong>in</strong><br />

the next 15 years. At the present pace <strong>of</strong> progression NER has been worked out on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> data, PIHS2001, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011 and <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics<br />

2011 and the actual target will be achieved <strong>in</strong> 2022.<br />

Table 81:Net Primary Enrolment Rate 2001/02-2010/11<br />

2001/02 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Development<br />

Statistics<br />

2011<br />

MDG<br />

Target<br />

2015<br />

Actual<br />

Target<br />

Achieved<br />

2022<br />

Net Primary<br />

Enrolment (%)<br />

44 56 58 60 64 68 88 100 100<br />

Source: PIHS 2001/02, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011.<br />

56 Details <strong>of</strong> projections to reach MDG/EFA Goals have been discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter-2 <strong>in</strong> Sections 2.12 & 2.13<br />

121


Figure 12:Net Primary Enrolment Rate 2008-2022<br />

Percentage<br />

4.6: Gender Parity <strong>in</strong> Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Chapter 2 Sections 2.7-2.12 describe achievable targets with affordable costs aga<strong>in</strong>st a<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators. Genders disparities exist <strong>in</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> residence and76 % <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

males are literate compared to 58 % <strong>of</strong> rural females. The younger population, aged 15-<br />

19, is slightly less literate than those aged 20-24: amongst males, 80 % compared to 78<br />

%, and amongst females 70% compared to 66%. The highest wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile has<br />

the highest youth literacy rate, especially amongst women and girls: amongst males, the<br />

highest wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile has a literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 94 % compared to 52 % <strong>in</strong> the lowest<br />

and amongst females 95 % compared to 19 %. Literacy rates <strong>of</strong> household members<br />

above 15 years <strong>of</strong> age is more than half (56 %) <strong>of</strong> whom are literate. Amongst males, the<br />

literacy rate at 66%, is 21% higher than amongst females (45 %) (MICS 2007-08, <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Development Statistics, 2011, L&NFBED, 2010, PSLM 2007-08 & 2010-11). The gender<br />

gap is slightly narrower <strong>in</strong> major cities and <strong>in</strong> other urban areas. The district variations <strong>in</strong><br />

literacy rates amongst 15+ year-olds are similar to those amongst 10+ year-olds. More<br />

than half (59%) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> population above 10 years is literate, with a clear, sharp<br />

differential between males (69%) and females (50%). Literacy (10+ years) varies<br />

considerably between urban and rural areas, with about half (52 %) <strong>of</strong> rural-dwellers<br />

literate compared to 77% <strong>in</strong> major cities and 72 % <strong>in</strong> other urban areas. Gender<br />

disparities also exist by area <strong>of</strong> residence. In rural areas 64% males are literate compared<br />

to only 40 % females. The gender gap is slightly narrower <strong>in</strong> major cities (males 81%;<br />

females 74%) and <strong>in</strong> other urban areas (males 78%; females 65%). Literacy amongst<br />

people over 10 years <strong>of</strong> age <strong>in</strong>creases where the older population is less literate than the<br />

younger. While there is the expected positive correlation with education, <strong>of</strong> those who<br />

have never attended school (47% <strong>of</strong> the 10+population), 37% reported that they are<br />

literate. (MICS 2007-08, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, L&NFBED, 2011, PSLM<br />

2007-08 & 2010-11). The gaps <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Gender Parity Index (GPI) are be<strong>in</strong>g bridged<br />

quickly. There are 43970 Primary Schools, 21912 Primary Schools for boys and 2208<br />

122


Primary Schools for girls. In terms <strong>of</strong> enrollment, the total enrollment at primary level <strong>in</strong><br />

Government Schools is 47, 94,000 whereas the enrollment for boys is 26, 67,000 and for<br />

girls it is 21, 27,000. Gender disparities also exist by area <strong>of</strong> residence. In rural areas 64%<br />

males are literate compared to only 40% females. The gender gap is slightly narrower <strong>in</strong><br />

major cities (males 81 %; females 74%) and <strong>in</strong> other urban areas (males 78%; females<br />

65%). Literacy amongst people over 10 years <strong>of</strong> age <strong>in</strong>creases where the older population<br />

is less literate than the younger. While there is the expected positive correlation with<br />

education, <strong>of</strong> those who have never attended school (47% <strong>of</strong> the 10+population), 37 %<br />

reported that they are literate. Literacy rates (10+ years) were highest <strong>in</strong> the districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di (80%), Jhelum (77%), Lahore and Gujrat (74%) and lowest <strong>in</strong> Rajanpur<br />

(33%), D.G. Khan, Rahim Yar Khan and Lodhran (44%) (MICS 2007-08, <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Development Statistics, 2011, L&NFBED, 2010, PSLM 2007-08 & 2010-11). At the<br />

present pace <strong>of</strong> progression GPI has been worked out on the basis <strong>of</strong> data, PIHS 2001,<br />

PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011 and <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011 and the actual target will<br />

be achieved <strong>in</strong> 2017.<br />

Table 82:Gender Parity Index (GPI) Primary <strong>Education</strong> : 2001/02-2010-11<br />

2001/02 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Development<br />

Statistics<br />

2011<br />

MDG<br />

Target<br />

2015<br />

Actual<br />

Target<br />

Achieved<br />

2017<br />

GPI Primary<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

0.82 0.85 0.85 0.81 0.84 0.88 0.94 1 1<br />

Source: PIHS 2001/02, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011.<br />

Figure 13: Gender Parity Index (GPI) Primary <strong>Education</strong>: 2012-2017<br />

123


Table 83: Gender Parity Index (GPI) <strong>in</strong> Youth Literacy: 2001/02-2010/11<br />

2001/02 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Development<br />

Statistics 2011<br />

MDG<br />

Target<br />

2015<br />

Youth 0.66 0.72 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.86 1 1<br />

Literacy<br />

Gender<br />

Parity Index<br />

Source: PIHS 2001/02, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011.<br />

Figure 14: Gender Parity Index (GPI) <strong>in</strong> Youth Literacy: 2012-2024<br />

Actual<br />

Target<br />

Achieved<br />

2024<br />

Table 84:Gender Parity Index (GPI) Secondary <strong>Education</strong>: 2010/11<br />

2001/02 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Actual<br />

MDG<br />

Development<br />

Target<br />

Target<br />

Statistics<br />

Achieved<br />

2015<br />

2011<br />

2013<br />

Gender Parity 0.77 0.80 0.81 0.82 0.85 0.87 0.92 0.94 0.94<br />

Index (GPI) <strong>in</strong><br />

Secondary<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

Source: PIHS 2001/02, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011.<br />

Figure 15: Gender Parity Index (GPI) Secondary <strong>Education</strong>: 2012 2013<br />

124


4.7: Completion/Survival Rates<br />

Chapter 2 Sections 2.7 - 2.12 describe achievable targets with affordable costs aga<strong>in</strong>st a<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators. At the moment, there are 7534 Middle Schools, 3163 Middle<br />

Schools for boys and 4371 Middle Schools for girls. In terms <strong>of</strong> enrollment, the total<br />

enrollment at Middle level <strong>in</strong> Government Schools is 21, 29,000 whereas the enrollment<br />

for boys is 9, 97,000 and for girls it is 11, 32,000 (<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011).<br />

There are 4839 High Schools, 2974 High Schools for boys and 1865 High Schools for<br />

girls. In terms <strong>of</strong> enrollment, the total enrollment at High School level <strong>in</strong> Government<br />

Schools is 30, 51,000 whereas, the enrollment for boys is 17, 74,000 and for girls it is 12,<br />

77,000 (<strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011).<br />

GPI at Middle level is skewed <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> enrollment for girls <strong>in</strong> Government Schools.<br />

However efforts are be<strong>in</strong>g made to ensure more enrollments <strong>of</strong> boys at Middle level. At<br />

Primary and High School level, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> is mak<strong>in</strong>g dedicated efforts to<br />

ensure GPI by 2015.The gender parity <strong>in</strong>dex for youth literacy has advanced steadily over<br />

the past five years. It has, undoubtedly, achieved the MTDF 2010 target <strong>of</strong> 0.8 and as<br />

such may progress satisfactorily towards its MDG target <strong>in</strong> the next five years. At the<br />

present pace <strong>of</strong> progression completion/survival has been worked out on the basis <strong>of</strong> data,<br />

PIHS 2001, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011 and <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011 and the<br />

actual target will be achieved <strong>in</strong> 2030.<br />

Table 85: Completion/Survival Rates till Grade V: 2001/02-2010/11<br />

2001/02 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Development<br />

Statistics<br />

2011<br />

MDG<br />

Target<br />

2015<br />

Actual<br />

Target<br />

Achieved<br />

2030<br />

Completion/<br />

Survival<br />

Rate Till<br />

Grade V<br />

58 68 72.4 68 64 62 80 100 100<br />

Source: PIHS 2001/02, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011.<br />

Figure 16: Completion/Survival Rates till Grade V: 2012-2030<br />

125


4.8: Youth (15-24 years old) Literacy Gender Parity<br />

The younger population, aged 15-19, is slightly less literate than those aged 20-24:<br />

amongst males, 80% compared to 78%, and amongst females 70% compared to 66%. The<br />

highest wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile has the highest youth literacy rate, especially amongst<br />

women and girls: amongst males, the highest wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile has a literacy rate <strong>of</strong><br />

94% compared to 52% <strong>in</strong> the lowest and amongst females 95% compared to 19%.<br />

Literacy rates <strong>of</strong> household members above 15 years <strong>of</strong> age is more than half (56%) <strong>of</strong><br />

whom are literate. Amongst males, the literacy rate at 66% is 21% higher than amongst<br />

females (45%). Variations <strong>in</strong> literacy rate <strong>in</strong> 15+ age group is similar to those <strong>in</strong> 10+<br />

with lower rates, <strong>in</strong> rural areas particularly for males. With<strong>in</strong> districts, there are sever<br />

disparities <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> male and female literacy rate. While the overall youth literacy rate<br />

is 73%, amongst males it is 79% and amongst females 68%. There is a variation i.e. 80%<br />

literacy rate <strong>in</strong> Rawalp<strong>in</strong>di District be<strong>in</strong>g the highest whereas it is 33% <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong><br />

Rajanpur District be<strong>in</strong>g the lowest. The problem is further aggravated once we focus on<br />

rural and urban areas as well as literacy rates for male and female. Variations <strong>in</strong> literacy<br />

rate <strong>in</strong> 15+ age group is similar to those <strong>in</strong> 10+ with lower rates, <strong>in</strong> rural areas<br />

particularly for males. The gender gap is slightly narrower <strong>in</strong> major cities and <strong>in</strong> other<br />

urban areas. The district variations <strong>in</strong> literacy rates amongst 15+ year-olds are similar to<br />

those amongst 10+ year-olds. More than half (59%) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> population above 10<br />

years is literate, with a clear, sharp differential between males (69%) and females (50%).<br />

Literacy (10+ years) varies considerably between urban and rural areas, with about half<br />

(52%) <strong>of</strong> rural-dwellers literate compared to 77% <strong>in</strong> major cities and 72% <strong>in</strong> other urban<br />

areas (MICS 2007-08, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics, 2011, L&NFBED, 2010). At the<br />

present pace <strong>of</strong> progression Adult Youth Literacy Rate has been worked out on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> data, PIHS 2001, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011 and <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011 and<br />

the actual target will be achieved <strong>in</strong> 2017.<br />

Table 86: Adult Literacy Rate:2001/02-2010/11<br />

2001/02 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Development<br />

Statistics 2011<br />

MDG<br />

Target<br />

2015<br />

Adult 47 55 57 58 59 60 80 86 86<br />

(10+Years)<br />

Literacy<br />

Rate<br />

Source: PIHS 2001/02, PMIU-PESRP 2004/2011, <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011.<br />

Figure 17: Adult Literacy Rate:2012-2017<br />

Actual Target<br />

Achieved<br />

2017<br />

126


Table 87: Out <strong>of</strong> School Children <strong>in</strong> 2010-11 belong<strong>in</strong>g to 5-9 Year Age Group<br />

Gender Population (5-9)<br />

(million)<br />

NER (%) Enrolment (million) Out <strong>of</strong> School<br />

( million)<br />

Male & Female 9.82 62 6.41 3.80<br />

Male 5.13 64 3.52 1.80<br />

Female 4.69 60 2.89 2.00<br />

Source: PESRP-PMIU Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> 2010-11<br />

Table 87 above <strong>in</strong>dicates the huge challenge and gigantic task to be accomplished by the<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> and all stakeholders to educate the out-<strong>of</strong>-school population<br />

through formal and <strong>in</strong>formal systems <strong>of</strong> education.<br />

Table 88: Achievements <strong>of</strong> Targets and Supportive Environment<br />

Achieve Universal<br />

Primary<br />

Enrolment by 2015<br />

Completion Rate<br />

to Grade V<br />

Adult Literacy<br />

Will target be reached<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Supportive Environment<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>itely Probably Unlikely Strong Fair Weak<br />

Gender Parity <strong>in</strong><br />

Primary<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

Gender Parity <strong>in</strong><br />

Secondary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Gender Parity <strong>in</strong> Youth<br />

Literacy<br />

Source: <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, PESRP-PMIU Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> 2010-11,<br />

PSLM 2007-08 & 2011-12<br />

Table 88 above <strong>in</strong>dicates the huge risk <strong>of</strong> not achiev<strong>in</strong>g the MDG/EFA goals.<br />

Extraord<strong>in</strong>ary measures and political will discussed <strong>in</strong> the aforementioned chapters is the<br />

only panacea to honor the <strong>in</strong>ternational commitments.<br />

127


Chapter 5:<br />

5.1: Public Sector Budgetary <strong>Education</strong> Allocations/Expenditures<br />

5.2: <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Budget<br />

In order to generate estimates <strong>of</strong> budget required to achieve target set <strong>in</strong> Article 25-A, it<br />

is essential to understand the current pattern <strong>of</strong> budgetary allocations and spend<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

on education at district and prov<strong>in</strong>cial levels. Like all other prov<strong>in</strong>ces the education<br />

budget <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> is allocated at two levels i.e. prov<strong>in</strong>cial and district. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the FY<br />

2009-10, district and prov<strong>in</strong>cial education budget was Rs.112,717.86 million, compris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Rs.86, 999.67 million current budget and Rs.25,718.19 million for development budget.<br />

In FY 2010-11, Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> allocated Rs.130,926.04 million to education<br />

sector, which <strong>in</strong>cludes 85% current budget and 15% development budget. Out <strong>of</strong> total<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce, Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> allocated Rs.27,374.71 million to<br />

education sector <strong>in</strong> FY 2010-11, which comprises 51% current budget and 49%<br />

development budget. As compared to FY 2009-10, current budget <strong>in</strong>creased by 29% and<br />

development budget <strong>in</strong>creased by 2% only (PMIU-PESRP 2011).<br />

Table 89 <strong>in</strong>dicates outcome based targets for education <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> for different sub-sectors<br />

<strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> School <strong>Education</strong> Department.<br />

Table 89: Outcome Based Targets for <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> (Rs <strong>in</strong> Millions)<br />

Intervention<br />

Targets<br />

2010-11<br />

Achievements<br />

2010-11<br />

Targets<br />

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14<br />

Up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Schools<br />

(Primary to Middle and 1,000 818 400 300 300<br />

Middle to high level)<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> School Teachers<br />

and Managers 150,000 120,000 150,100 175,300 200,000<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Computer Labs.<br />

In 1000 Elementary Schools<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> - - 1,000 - -<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Facilities <strong>in</strong> Schools 1,500 1,613 1,500 1,500 1,500<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Science Lab<br />

equipment <strong>in</strong> 1000 highly<br />

enrolled High/higher<br />

Secondary Schools - - 1,000 500 500<br />

Capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> School<br />

Councils 15,204 10,000 15,000 15,000<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, F<strong>in</strong>ance Department Budget 2011-12<br />

128


Table 90: Allocation Trend (Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Budget) Current and Development Budgets<br />

Year<br />

129<br />

Current<br />

Development<br />

Rs. Million Change (%) Rs. Million Change (%)<br />

2007-08 21,754.57 20,303.26<br />

2008-09 22,521.63 4 30,078.00 48<br />

2009-10 21,267.17 -6 26,125.00 -13<br />

2010-11 27,374.71 29 26,597.42 2<br />

Source: PESRP/PMIU 2009 -2010<br />

The share <strong>of</strong> current and development budgets <strong>in</strong> the overall education budget <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

has been fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g significantly, which underscores the need for steady <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

allocations under different budgetary l<strong>in</strong>es to achieve the targets set <strong>in</strong> Article 25-A. At<br />

district level, <strong>in</strong> FY 2009-10, Rs.88, 440.42 million were allocated for education, which<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded Rs.79, 320.19 million current budget and Rs.9, 120.05 million development<br />

budget. However, <strong>in</strong> the current FY 2010-11, the education budget <strong>of</strong> districts has<br />

decreased by 20% over the last year’s budget, whereas development budget was reduced<br />

by 62%.<br />

Table 91: Allocation Trend (District <strong>Education</strong>) Current and Development Budgets<br />

Total District <strong>Education</strong><br />

Current<br />

Development<br />

Budget<br />

Year<br />

Change<br />

Change<br />

Rs. Million Change (%) Rs. Million<br />

Rs. Million<br />

(%)<br />

(%)<br />

2009-10 79,320.19 9,120.05 88,440.24<br />

2010-11 102,370.19 +29% 3,493.05 -62% 105,863.24 -20%<br />

Source: PESRP/PMIU 2009 -2010<br />

Annual Development Programme (ADP) is composed <strong>of</strong> public <strong>in</strong>vestments made <strong>in</strong><br />

different sectors <strong>of</strong> the economy <strong>in</strong> a given year by the Government. These <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />

are not only <strong>in</strong>strumental <strong>in</strong> accelerat<strong>in</strong>g economic growth and development but also<br />

def<strong>in</strong>e and open up economic opportunities for the private sector and other stakeholders.<br />

ADP with its sectoral composition reflects the development priorities <strong>of</strong> the Government<br />

and thus, has a pivotal role <strong>in</strong> guid<strong>in</strong>g the strategic direction <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial economy.<br />

Before outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the contours <strong>of</strong> ADP 2011-12, it will be appropriate to take stock <strong>of</strong><br />

ADP performance dur<strong>in</strong>g the last fiscal year, clos<strong>in</strong>g on 30th June, 2011. The Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Government and P&D Department had to confront and overcome a number <strong>of</strong> formidable<br />

and unanticipated challenges <strong>in</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> ADP 2010-11.<br />

The first and foremost challenge was posed by unprecedented floods, which devastated<br />

the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and rest <strong>of</strong> the country dur<strong>in</strong>g the early part <strong>of</strong> last fiscal year. In addition to<br />

human misery and suffer<strong>in</strong>gs, massive damage was caused to prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

and public service delivery outfits, particularly <strong>in</strong> the southern districts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>. To<br />

meet press<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>of</strong> the affected population and with no expectation <strong>of</strong> any urgent


esource <strong>in</strong>flow from other sources, the prov<strong>in</strong>cial ADP funds were redirected and<br />

redeployed by the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Government to undertake massive relief, recovery and<br />

rehabilitation operations. This not only reduced the resource availability for new and ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ADP projects but also delayed their implementation especially <strong>in</strong> flood affected<br />

districts, which were immersed <strong>in</strong> flood waters for months.<br />

The second challenge faced dur<strong>in</strong>g the course <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> ADP 2010-11 is<br />

perta<strong>in</strong>ed to narrow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fiscal space available to the prov<strong>in</strong>ce due to shortfall <strong>in</strong><br />

projected federal transfers and <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> salaries <strong>of</strong> government employees.<br />

Expectations for additional resource <strong>in</strong>flow to the prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>in</strong> the aftermath <strong>of</strong> 7th NFC<br />

Award have unfortunately not materialized. As a result <strong>of</strong> these developments, the size <strong>of</strong><br />

ADP 2010-11 had to be progressively reviewed and curtailed to keep the prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

expenditure <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the resource availability. The prov<strong>in</strong>cial ADP thus had to be<br />

scaled down to Rs.128 billion.<br />

The utilization <strong>of</strong> ADP funds dur<strong>in</strong>g the first half <strong>of</strong> fiscal year also rema<strong>in</strong>ed slow. It<br />

picked up <strong>in</strong> the second half and is expected to be around Rs.105 billion by the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

year. While the aforementioned challenges brought about rationalization <strong>of</strong> ADP, many<br />

notable milestones were crossed dur<strong>in</strong>g the year. Repair and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> damaged<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> the flood affected districts was promptly executed, overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly with<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial resources and little federal or direct external assistance. Despite the ravages <strong>of</strong><br />

floods, a number <strong>of</strong> new projects <strong>in</strong> the social and <strong>in</strong>frastructure sectors were<br />

implemented <strong>in</strong> the Southern <strong>Punjab</strong>. The significant ones <strong>in</strong>ter-alia <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> Daanish Schools and launch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Skills Development Fund<br />

Company for impart<strong>in</strong>g skills tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to youth <strong>in</strong> four districts <strong>of</strong> Bahawalnagar,<br />

Bahawalpur, Lodhran and Muzaffargarh with the support <strong>of</strong> Department for International<br />

Development (DFID), UK.<br />

All these <strong>in</strong>terventions will be helpful <strong>in</strong> remov<strong>in</strong>g regional disparities and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

employment / <strong>in</strong>come generation opportunities for some <strong>of</strong> the poorest segments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong>'s population. In other districts <strong>of</strong> Central and Northern <strong>Punjab</strong>, special<br />

development packages have been successfully implemented <strong>in</strong> social and <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

sectors; full fund<strong>in</strong>g for these schemes has been ensured and they are expected to be<br />

operational by the end <strong>of</strong> the 2nd quarter <strong>of</strong> the next fiscal year. Rigorous monitor<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g done by the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Government to ensure their timely execution. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

year, a special effort has been made to m<strong>in</strong>imize throw forward <strong>of</strong> on-go<strong>in</strong>g ADP<br />

schemes by weed<strong>in</strong>g out unfeasible and slow mov<strong>in</strong>g schemes. Resources have been reappropriated<br />

from slow mov<strong>in</strong>g to fast mov<strong>in</strong>g schemes for their expeditious completion.<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> token allocation for new schemes has been discouraged and numerous new<br />

schemes with less than 15% allocation have been dropped. These <strong>in</strong>terventions have<br />

helped to clean up the current ADP portfolio and will set the standard <strong>in</strong> the com<strong>in</strong>g year.<br />

130


131<br />

Box-11: New Development Projects<br />

Given the paucity <strong>of</strong> resources available with the Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Government for undertak<strong>in</strong>g new development<br />

projects, the need for mobiliz<strong>in</strong>g resources from the private sector <strong>in</strong> a transparent manner to aid the prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

development effort is undisputed. The Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Government enacted the <strong>Punjab</strong> Public Private Partnership<br />

(PPP) for Infrastructure Act 2010, for this purpose. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year, a PPP Cell has been set up <strong>in</strong> the Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

& Development Department, which is carry<strong>in</strong>g forward the <strong>in</strong>tent <strong>of</strong> the law to generate additional fiscal space<br />

for development activities <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for design<strong>in</strong>g and implementation <strong>of</strong> PPP projects have<br />

been prepared and approved by the PPP Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee, which is also actively consider<strong>in</strong>g a few project<br />

proposals. As this <strong>in</strong>tervention matures <strong>in</strong> the com<strong>in</strong>g year, it is expected that private sector resources will start<br />

supplement<strong>in</strong>g the tax payer's money <strong>in</strong> accelerat<strong>in</strong>g the development process <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

Foreign assistance received by the prov<strong>in</strong>ce dur<strong>in</strong>g the year has supplemented domestic<br />

resources and fostered economic development as well as policy reform <strong>in</strong> various priority<br />

areas. These <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>terventions for poverty reduction, governance reforms, wider<br />

education and health coverage, improvement <strong>of</strong> physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

irrigation <strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

Annual Development Programme 2011-12 has been formulated with<strong>in</strong> a Medium Term<br />

Development Framework (MTDF), a roll<strong>in</strong>g plan provid<strong>in</strong>g development estimates for a<br />

three year period i.e. base year and the follow<strong>in</strong>g two years. The ma<strong>in</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Annual Development Programme 2011-12 cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be to:<br />

• achieve equitable growth embrac<strong>in</strong>g all classes, sectors and regions<br />

• extend social sector coverage<br />

• generate employment<br />

• enhance productivity and competitiveness <strong>in</strong> the production sector<br />

• encourage public private partnership<br />

• <strong>in</strong>frastructure development, its re-habilitation and consolidation<br />

• provide more resources for the less developed areas.<br />

Box 12: Annual Development Programme 2011-12<br />

The size <strong>of</strong> Annual Development Programme 2011-12 is pitched at Rs.188 billion which is Rs.60 billion higher<br />

than last year's revised size. The Core Programme is <strong>of</strong> Rs.154 billion which is 82% <strong>of</strong> the total development<br />

outlay. Special emphasis has aga<strong>in</strong> been laid on removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-regional disparities and a special allocation <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.10 billion has been proposed for 11 districts <strong>of</strong> Southern <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2011-12. An allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.3.5 billion<br />

has been made for 7 districts for which no allocation was made last year. Other special packages for districts<br />

and large cities have also been cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> ADP 2011-12. The focus on gender based <strong>in</strong>vestments rema<strong>in</strong>ed a<br />

priority with an approximate allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.13 billion. Investments proposed <strong>in</strong> schemes <strong>in</strong> rural and urban<br />

areas are <strong>in</strong> the approximate ratio <strong>of</strong> 65:35.The important features and new <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> ADP 2011-12<br />

are :<br />

• Annual Development Programme with<strong>in</strong> the Medium Term Framework<br />

• Adequate fund<strong>in</strong>g for foreign aided and mega projects<br />

• Protection <strong>of</strong> social sector <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />

• Regional balance <strong>in</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> resources with extra weight for less developed districts<br />

• Focus on undertak<strong>in</strong>g projects that can be completed with<strong>in</strong> one year to control throw-forward<br />

• Cont<strong>in</strong>ued strategic <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> large cities to realize their potential as eng<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> growth and<br />

enabl<strong>in</strong>g medium cities to share the urbanization pressure<br />

• Inclusion <strong>of</strong> District Packages-ll<br />

• No token allocations for new schemes<br />

• Allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.9.0 billion for <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the energy sector to overcome power shortages <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce.


• Allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs 4.0 billion for rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g road network & Rs 2 billion for new Farm to<br />

Market Road (FMR)<br />

• Allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs 2.5 billion for acquisition <strong>of</strong> land for new <strong>in</strong>dustrial city on motorway<br />

• Allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2.0 billion for provision <strong>of</strong> laptops to the students<br />

• Allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs 2.0 billion for Saaf Pani Project<br />

• Allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs 1 0 billion for Southern <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Programme (SPDP)<br />

• Adoption and cont<strong>in</strong>uation <strong>of</strong> projects devolved by the Federal Government to the <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

aftermath <strong>of</strong> 18th amendment.<br />

Like ADP 2010-11, the Development Programme 2011-12 is guided by the Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

and his cab<strong>in</strong>et's overarch<strong>in</strong>g vision to create and nurture a literate, healthy and culturally<br />

vibrant society <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> driven by private and public <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> the economy. Sector<br />

wise comparison <strong>of</strong> the allocations <strong>of</strong> development program <strong>in</strong> FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12<br />

is presented below:<br />

Table 92: Sector Wise Comparison <strong>of</strong> Development Programme 2010-11 and 2011-12<br />

(In millions)<br />

Sector<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>al Allocation<br />

2010-11<br />

Revised<br />

Allocation<br />

2010-11<br />

Allocation<br />

2011-12<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Sectors 68,253 46,735 71,635 53.28<br />

<strong>Education</strong> 23,300 13,828 23,900 72.84<br />

School <strong>Education</strong> 14,050 9,101 14,500 59.32<br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong> 6,350 4,040 6,500 60.89<br />

Special <strong>Education</strong> 500 42 500 1,090.48<br />

Literacy 800 340 800 135.29<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, F<strong>in</strong>ance Department, Budget 2011-12<br />

% Change Over<br />

2010-11 (Rev)<br />

Total budgetary allocations to education <strong>in</strong> 2011/12 amounted to Rs. 195.76 billion. This<br />

represented an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> 10.9% over the allocation <strong>in</strong> the previous year and 19.5%<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease over the revised allocations <strong>in</strong> 2010/11.In <strong>Punjab</strong>, while the actual education<br />

expenditures have <strong>in</strong>creased steadily over the past six years, the share <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> total<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial expenditures, too, has rema<strong>in</strong>ed high and steady, rang<strong>in</strong>g between 22.4% and<br />

27.8% <strong>of</strong> the total prov<strong>in</strong>cial expenditures.<br />

Table-93: <strong>Punjab</strong> Actual <strong>Education</strong> Expenditures & Share <strong>in</strong> Total Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Expenditures (2009/10) (Rs. Millions)<br />

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10<br />

Total <strong>Education</strong> Expenditure 50,581 55,903 71,353 76,159 103,979 107,319<br />

Current 43,647 52,288 63,140 71,780 96,220 100,151<br />

Development 6,934 3,615 8,213 4,379 7,759 7,168<br />

Share <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Total 27.8% 24.7% 22.9% 22.4% 25.6% 24.0%<br />

Expenditure<br />

Source: Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, F<strong>in</strong>ance Department, Budget 2009-10<br />

132


Figure-18: <strong>Punjab</strong>: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Actual <strong>Education</strong> Expenditures by Sub-Sectors<br />

(2009/10)<br />

Others<br />

18%<br />

Teacher &<br />

Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

5%<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> . Univ<br />

2%<br />

Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

41%<br />

Universities<br />

9%<br />

Secondary<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

25%<br />

Primary education (41%) rema<strong>in</strong>ed the most important sub-sector, with secondary education<br />

(25%) as the next <strong>in</strong> priority.<br />

5.3: Cost Estimations<br />

The cost estimations have been worked out <strong>in</strong> Chapter-2 <strong>in</strong> Section 2.5 to 2.13. In order to<br />

be compliant with the requirement <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A, the required f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources are<br />

estimated to be Rs.3387 billion for achiev<strong>in</strong>g 98% enrolment rate <strong>of</strong> 5-16 years <strong>of</strong><br />

population by 2024-25. It <strong>in</strong>cludes Rs.3023.78 billion current and Rs.363.26 billion<br />

development budgets. On average, a 15% annual <strong>in</strong>crease over the previous years <strong>in</strong><br />

education budget is required for achiev<strong>in</strong>g the targets under 25-A. The achievement <strong>of</strong><br />

targets is closely l<strong>in</strong>ked with the resource absorptive capacity. Various researches have<br />

proved that system lacks capacity to efficiently absorb even the available f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

resources. This capacity deficit needs to be bridged to effectively manage the additional<br />

resources and to seize the opportunities available after the 18th Amendment. Prov<strong>in</strong>ces<br />

should make sector plans and come up with calculations to engage federal government and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational partners for additional targets to achieve the target set <strong>in</strong> Article 25-A.<br />

Inefficiency costs <strong>of</strong> system have not been calculated <strong>in</strong> the projections given <strong>in</strong> this section.<br />

If <strong>in</strong>efficiency cost is calculated and curtailed it will help get rid <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>in</strong>efficiency<br />

thus ensur<strong>in</strong>g compliance with Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> a more cost effective manner.<br />

133


Chapter 6: Donor Assistance to <strong>Education</strong> Sector <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Table 94: DFID<br />

DFID<br />

Project End Date<br />

Committed<br />

( £ )<br />

Disbursed<br />

( £ ) Description<br />

Improve Access, June 30, 2014 £ 80 Million £ 43 Million 1. Enhance fiscal susta<strong>in</strong>ability and the<br />

Equity, Quality and<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> public expenditures<br />

Relevance <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> education<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

2. Enhance the quality <strong>of</strong> school<br />

education<br />

3. Improve and expand access through<br />

improvements <strong>in</strong> school participation<br />

and completion rates and reduction <strong>in</strong><br />

gender and regional disparities; and<br />

4. Strengthen school management and<br />

governance <strong>in</strong> the education sector<br />

Source: PMIU-PESRP 2011, School <strong>Education</strong> Department, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Table 95: GIZ Germany<br />

Project<br />

Promotion <strong>of</strong> Basic<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Germany<br />

End Date<br />

Committed Disbursed<br />

(EURO) (EURO)<br />

31-Dec-13 4.7 Million 86%<br />

disbursed<br />

up till<br />

September<br />

2011<br />

Description<br />

<strong>Education</strong> Sector Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Private School Census<br />

Capacity build<strong>in</strong>g, grants for low cost private<br />

sector (<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation),<br />

district capacity build<strong>in</strong>g programme, teacher<br />

performance <strong>in</strong>centive programme,<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation programme<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Type<br />

Grant<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Type<br />

Grant<br />

Source: PMIU-PESRP 2011, School <strong>Education</strong> Department, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, GIZ Office Lahore<br />

Project<br />

Project for Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

DAE Mechanical &<br />

Architecture Department <strong>in</strong><br />

GCT Railway Road Lahore,<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Project for Development <strong>of</strong><br />

Center <strong>of</strong> Excellence for<br />

Technical <strong>Education</strong><br />

Non-Formal <strong>Education</strong><br />

Promotion Project<br />

134<br />

End Date<br />

31-Dec-13 1.10<br />

Million<br />

31-Dec-13 387.51<br />

Million<br />

30-Jun-14<br />

Table 96: Japan<br />

Japan<br />

Committed Disbursed<br />

(USD) (USD)<br />

PKR<br />

189.00<br />

Million<br />

Description<br />

The project aims to provide a build<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

equipment to revamp the exist<strong>in</strong>g technical<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitution as a center <strong>of</strong> excellence for<br />

mechanical course and architecture course.<br />

The project aims to revamp the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technical <strong>in</strong>stitution as a center <strong>of</strong> excellence<br />

for mechanical course and architecture course<br />

so that the <strong>in</strong>stitution can produce the skilled<br />

manpower who meets the needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Promotion <strong>of</strong> the quality non-formal basic<br />

education and adult literacy program by<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g the curriculum (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

standard and assessment method) and capacity<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Type<br />

Grant<br />

Grant<br />

Grant


development <strong>of</strong> the related stakeholders.<br />

Source: PMIU-PESRP 2011, School <strong>Education</strong> Department, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Literacy &<br />

NFBED 2011, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Table 97: <strong>UNESCO</strong><br />

Project<br />

Capacity Development for<br />

EFA<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Literacy Resource Centre for<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> Functional<br />

Literacy Centers <strong>in</strong> Flood<br />

Affected people <strong>of</strong> D.G.Khan<br />

and Muzaffargarh Phase I<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> Functional<br />

Literacy Centers <strong>in</strong> Flood<br />

Affected people <strong>of</strong> D.G.Khan<br />

and Muzaffargarh Phase II<br />

End Date Committed<br />

(USD)<br />

31-Dec-10 PKR 7.52<br />

Million<br />

31-Dec-10 PKR 1.85<br />

Million<br />

July 2011 PKR 3.27<br />

Million<br />

<strong>UNESCO</strong><br />

Disbursed<br />

(USD)<br />

PKR 7.52<br />

Million<br />

PKR 1.85<br />

Million<br />

PKR 3.27<br />

Million<br />

Source: Literacy & NFBED 2011, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Description<br />

Project is under the <strong>UNESCO</strong> Regular<br />

Programme with 2 years life span. It<br />

covers the activities related to Six<br />

Dakar EFA Goals.<br />

Project was launched for the flood<br />

affected districts <strong>of</strong> D.G.Khan and<br />

Muzaffargarh<br />

Project was launched for the flood<br />

affected districts <strong>of</strong> D.G.Khan and<br />

Muzaffargarh<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g Type<br />

Grant/Technic<br />

al Assistance<br />

Grant/Technic<br />

al Assistance<br />

Grant/Technic<br />

al Assistance<br />

Table 98: The World Bank<br />

Project End Date Committed<br />

( £ )<br />

Support 4 Pillars June 30, 2012 $ 400<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

Million<br />

Reforms<br />

Programme<br />

135<br />

The World Bank<br />

Disbursed<br />

Description<br />

( £ )<br />

$376 Million Budgetary support as eligible expenditure<br />

programme for:<br />

• Teacher salaries<br />

• Girls stipends<br />

• School council recurrent budget and capacity<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Grants for low cost private sector (<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> Foundation)<br />

• District capacity build<strong>in</strong>g programme<br />

• Teacher performance <strong>in</strong>centive programme<br />

• Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation programme<br />

• Disbursements are based on the achievement <strong>of</strong><br />

pre-specified results, referred to as disbursementl<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators (DLIs), which represent priority<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Type<br />

Loan


elements <strong>in</strong> the reform programme.<br />

Source: PMIU-PESRP 2011, School <strong>Education</strong> Department, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Table 99: Canadian International Development Agency<br />

Canadian International Development Agency<br />

Project End Date Committed<br />

( £ )<br />

Disbursed<br />

( £ )<br />

Description<br />

Improve Access, June 30, Canadian Canadian The project aims to support the education reform<br />

Equity, Quality and 2012 Dollars 19.7 Dollars<br />

Relevance <strong>in</strong><br />

Million 16.2<br />

programme <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

Million which aims to improve access, quality and<br />

governance <strong>in</strong> basic education. The objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

the project are to support all elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> Sector Reform Programme (PESRP) that<br />

are complementary to CIDA's current or <strong>in</strong>tended<br />

programm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> teacher education. Key elements <strong>of</strong><br />

this programme <strong>in</strong>clude the roll<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>-service<br />

teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and mentor<strong>in</strong>g across <strong>Punjab</strong>'s 35<br />

districts (from the 12 districts currently targeted)<br />

and the phased <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> English lessons<br />

across <strong>Punjab</strong>’s schools.<br />

Source: PMIU-PESRP 2011, School <strong>Education</strong> Department, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Type<br />

Grant<br />

136


Chapter 7: <strong>Punjab</strong>’s Medium Term Development: Needs, Target Groups,<br />

Strategies and Priorities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

7.1: <strong>Punjab</strong>’s <strong>Education</strong> Needs <strong>in</strong> the Next Five Years<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> System needed a Five Years Strategic Plan to ensure achievement <strong>of</strong><br />

MDGs by 2015 and EFA Targets. While formulat<strong>in</strong>g Vision 2030, Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong>, rightly emphasized on Medium Term Development Plan, Five Years Strategic Plan<br />

and Ten Years Strategic Plan. The strategic plans are focus<strong>in</strong>g on Universal Primary<br />

<strong>Education</strong> (UPE), completion <strong>of</strong> full primary school<strong>in</strong>g by all children, promote gender<br />

equality, ensure 100% participation rate at primary level by 2011 and participation through<br />

enhancement at the elementary and secondary levels, improv<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>of</strong> education,<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> science and computer education up to secondary level, reduction <strong>in</strong> gender and<br />

regional disparities <strong>in</strong> access to education and provision <strong>of</strong> quality education for deprived<br />

and marg<strong>in</strong>alized segments <strong>of</strong> society. Medium Term Development Framework (2010-13)<br />

and Annual Development Programme (2010-11) clearly del<strong>in</strong>eate the strategy to cater for<br />

the needs and priorities <strong>of</strong> education sector and are <strong>in</strong> unison with Vision 2030, Medium<br />

Term Development Plan (2010-13), Five Years Strategic Plan (2010-15) and Ten Years<br />

Strategic Plan (2010-20).<br />

The major strategic priorities <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> are to achieve UPE, <strong>in</strong> addition<br />

to ensure access, quality, equity and good governance <strong>in</strong> education. The strategic priorities<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Government supplement the MDGs and <strong>in</strong>clude eradication <strong>of</strong> extreme poverty,<br />

expand education, reduce child mortality rates, fight disease epidemics and develop a global<br />

partnership for development. The second and third MDGs specifically address education:<br />

improvements <strong>in</strong> literacy, primary and secondary education and elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> gender<br />

disparities <strong>in</strong> education. Target 4 deals with elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> gender disparity <strong>in</strong> primary and<br />

secondary education by 2005 and at all levels <strong>of</strong> education but not later than 2015. Recent<br />

statistics on <strong>Punjab</strong>’s education <strong>in</strong>dicators show that gender parity <strong>in</strong>dices would hopefully<br />

meet the MDG targets by 2015 but <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> other targets, Pakistan is at the serious risk <strong>of</strong><br />

not achiev<strong>in</strong>g MDGs (Annexure-I & II). Achiev<strong>in</strong>g other targets would require enhanced<br />

commitment and <strong>in</strong>tensive efforts. For example, universal primary education will require<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> primary education through both formal as well as non-formal means; through<br />

public as well as private sectors; improv<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>of</strong> education; <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g community<br />

participation and other possible strategies. Encouragement and facilitation <strong>of</strong> the private<br />

sector will be the right step at the right time <strong>in</strong> the right direction. Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>Punjab</strong> has<br />

constituted a Task Force for Elementary <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2008. The Task Force has submitted<br />

its report. PEF has been tasked to motivate private sector to open more schools <strong>in</strong> the remote<br />

rural areas and urban slums under FAS Programme. With the <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

137


stakeholders <strong>in</strong> education, compliment<strong>in</strong>g and supplement<strong>in</strong>g each other’s efforts is the<br />

solution for the herculean task.<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> has the overall literacy rate for population <strong>of</strong> 10 years and older at 59% whereas it is<br />

70% for male and 48% for female (PSLM-2007-08). It is slightly better than the previous<br />

survey where the overall literacy rate <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> was 58% whereas it was 67% for male and<br />

48% for female (PSLM-2006-07). With this pace, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> will not be<br />

able to achieve MDG-EFA goals. The huge illiterate population is a challenge and needs<br />

immediate policy <strong>in</strong>terventions. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has already established a<br />

separate department i.e. L&NFBED and the projects launched has been a huge success. The<br />

level <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention however, does not match the enormity <strong>of</strong> the problem. The issue <strong>of</strong><br />

adult illiterates (male and female) can easily be addressed by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g functional literacy<br />

with a lifelong vocational skill. The recent <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the budgetary allocation <strong>of</strong><br />

L&NFBED is the manifestation <strong>of</strong> public policy <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>. The<br />

experience <strong>of</strong> functional literacy has been highly fruitful and there has not been a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

drop-out <strong>in</strong> the adult literacy centers impart<strong>in</strong>g literacy and vocational skills together. The<br />

partnership with PVTC and TEVTA has been an added advantage. There is a need to scale<br />

up the programmes <strong>of</strong> adult literacy and vocational skills <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has already chalked out a Five Year Strategy Plan and Ten Year<br />

Strategy Plan. The commitment <strong>of</strong> the Government seems stoic s<strong>in</strong>ce allocation <strong>of</strong> budget<br />

for literacy has been enhanced manifold and progress is be<strong>in</strong>g monitored on monthly basis<br />

at the highest level. The technical and pr<strong>of</strong>essional assistance by <strong>UNESCO</strong> Pakistan is an<br />

added advantage to L&NFBED. With the nice mix <strong>of</strong> right allocation, right public policy,<br />

right technical and pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>in</strong>put and right implementation mechanism, one can be<br />

sangu<strong>in</strong>e that the speed towards MDG/EFA goals will be accelerated.<br />

A common set <strong>of</strong> problems that plague the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> education sector, <strong>in</strong>clude weak<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g, low budget provisions, delays <strong>in</strong> allocations, poor ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, low utilization,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>ed staff; poor governance, weak monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation and absence <strong>of</strong> client<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the design <strong>of</strong> service provision. For successful implementation <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

<strong>in</strong>cipient <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> education, strong political will, stoic determ<strong>in</strong>ation and resilient<br />

management are required. Supply-driven programs and <strong>in</strong>stitutions planned to be<br />

established dur<strong>in</strong>g one political regime are abandoned after change <strong>of</strong> political scenario.<br />

Consequently, the <strong>in</strong>complete schemes become additional liability seek<strong>in</strong>g solution from the<br />

planners. <strong>Policy</strong> is a government function, which affects the plann<strong>in</strong>g objectives for<br />

education. The fact that education has failed to f<strong>in</strong>d its place <strong>in</strong> the matrix <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

priorities and targets <strong>in</strong> the past have rema<strong>in</strong>ed unrealized is the result <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts, rooted <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> factors at the societal and state levels. There have<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly been consistent efforts on the part <strong>of</strong> governments to expand education. These<br />

efforts, however, appear to be stymied by structural and policy functions such as<br />

138


macroeconomic and fiscal stabilization policies, poverty, weak implementation <strong>of</strong> education<br />

policies, and socio-political environment. By now, education sector has been prioritized at<br />

the highest political and pr<strong>of</strong>essional level.<br />

7.2: Proposed Strategies and Actions for Improv<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

<strong>Education</strong> is the <strong>in</strong>herent right <strong>of</strong> all children. Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the Constitution has made it<br />

enforceable right and statutory obligation <strong>of</strong> the state. For provid<strong>in</strong>g quality education,<br />

different <strong>in</strong>terventions like capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> teachers and managers; cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g achievements through exam<strong>in</strong>ations; provision <strong>of</strong> quality text books;<br />

I.T. labs, science labs and libraries have already been <strong>in</strong>troduced. Moreover, up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />

schools from Primary to Elementary level & from Elementary to High level and provision <strong>of</strong><br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g facilities (Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water, Sanitation, Boundary Walls, Electricity, Furniture &<br />

Toilet blocks). The follow<strong>in</strong>g strategies and actions for implementation to improve<br />

education sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> are imm<strong>in</strong>ent. The right policy framework is <strong>in</strong> place. There are<br />

three th<strong>in</strong>gs need to be done immediately, firstly implementation, secondly implementation<br />

and thirdly implementation.<br />

7.2.1: Equity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong>.<br />

Without equity <strong>in</strong> education, there is a danger <strong>of</strong> class divide and educational apartheid<br />

which Pakistan cannot afford be<strong>in</strong>g an ideological state. The Constitution <strong>of</strong> the country<br />

bars discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> all forms. It is therefore, important to ensure equity <strong>in</strong> education<br />

sector along with access, quality and governance. In order to address the issues <strong>of</strong> equity,<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has already established <strong>Punjab</strong> Daanish School System &Centers<br />

<strong>of</strong> Excellence Authority. Provision <strong>of</strong> quality education is priority area <strong>of</strong> the Government<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Daanish School and Center <strong>of</strong> Excellence Authority has been established<br />

recently <strong>in</strong> 2010. Poorest <strong>of</strong> the poor will get education <strong>of</strong> International Standards <strong>in</strong> these<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions. The ma<strong>in</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> Daanish School System and Center <strong>of</strong> Excellence<br />

Authority are:-<br />

• To provide quality education to most deprived and marg<strong>in</strong>alized segments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

society<br />

• To comb<strong>in</strong>e the best features <strong>of</strong> traditional education <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> progressive<br />

Islamic and modern learn<strong>in</strong>g paradigm with prime focus on science subjects<br />

• To develop the student’s <strong>in</strong>tellect, character and physique, thereby enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to<br />

make purposeful contribution for the nation at the national level and to the<br />

community at the micro level<br />

• To cater for the overall development <strong>of</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alized students with emphasis on<br />

academics, sports and physical education mixed with social/cultural activities<br />

Six Daanish Schools have already been established and fifteen will be established <strong>in</strong> next<br />

one year. 72 exist<strong>in</strong>g schools will be converted <strong>in</strong>to Centers <strong>of</strong> Excellence <strong>in</strong> Phase-1. Major<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the scheme <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

(a) Provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructural facilities<br />

(b) Free board<strong>in</strong>g and lodg<strong>in</strong>g facilities<br />

(c) Establishment <strong>of</strong> science and I.T. Labs<br />

(d) Establishment <strong>of</strong> Libraries and<br />

139


(e)<br />

(f)<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> transport facilities<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong> the art build<strong>in</strong>gs for Daanish Schools.<br />

There is a fierce criticism by certa<strong>in</strong> sectors on this <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>of</strong> the Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

but fact rema<strong>in</strong>s that it is much appreciated by neglected, unreached, marg<strong>in</strong>alized and<br />

poorest <strong>of</strong> the poor segment <strong>of</strong> society <strong>in</strong> remote rural area <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. There is a dire need to<br />

ensure access, quality and equity to all segments <strong>of</strong> society to avoid educational apartheid.<br />

There is a consensus that educat<strong>in</strong>g the people is the best way to empower them socially and<br />

economically. When seen <strong>in</strong> this context the Daanish School System & Centers <strong>of</strong><br />

Excellence Authority is the right decision especially for those at the br<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong> the society.<br />

7.2.2: Provision <strong>of</strong> Computer/I.T. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Elementary Schools:<br />

In order to better equip the students with ICT education, 515 I.T. Labs are be<strong>in</strong>g established<br />

<strong>in</strong> Elementary Schools <strong>in</strong> C.F.Y. 2010-11. Provision <strong>of</strong> Science Labs <strong>in</strong> Secondary Schools<br />

is aimed to improve exist<strong>in</strong>g Science Labs <strong>in</strong> Secondary Schools and to strengthen Science<br />

Practical education, a development scheme has been proposed and <strong>in</strong> the first phase, about<br />

1000 High/Higher Secondary Schools hav<strong>in</strong>g highest enrolment will be provided quality<br />

science equipment. Standardized practical books will also be developed under this scheme.<br />

There is the need to ensure m<strong>in</strong>imum service delivery Standard for School <strong>Education</strong>.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has already established standards for establishment <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

schools and their subsequent up-gradations to elementary and secondary level. There is a<br />

dire and <strong>in</strong>cessant need to ensure access at primary, elementary and secondary level.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> constituted a Task Force to established standards science and I.T.<br />

Labs equipment. The Task Force has recommended the standards and Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> has notified those standards for public and private sector.<br />

7.2.3: Up-Gradations <strong>of</strong> the Schools<br />

The analysis <strong>in</strong> Chapter-3 above clearly <strong>in</strong>dicates that there is a chasm and all the boys and<br />

girls graduat<strong>in</strong>g at primary schools do not have adequate number <strong>of</strong> facilities at elementary<br />

level. There is a need for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> schools. With an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong><br />

students at Secondary level, policy makers <strong>in</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> thought it<br />

appropriate that exist<strong>in</strong>g Secondary Schools should be upgraded to Higher Secondary<br />

Schools. This will help the students to cont<strong>in</strong>ue their education beyond Grade-10 especially<br />

for Girls s<strong>in</strong>ce distance to educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions substantially dropped the enrollment <strong>in</strong><br />

case <strong>of</strong> female students.<br />

7.2.4: Sectoral Priority <strong>of</strong> School <strong>Education</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong>’s Medium Term Development, Vision 2030, Medium Term Development Plan<br />

(2010-13), Five Years Strategic Plan (2010-15) and Ten Years Strategic Plan (2010-20), are<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g accorded priority <strong>in</strong> education focus<strong>in</strong>g on disadvantaged groups, especially the<br />

unreached, neglected, less-affluent, disenfranchised and marg<strong>in</strong>alized sections <strong>of</strong> society<br />

140


with the purpose <strong>of</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> social and economic <strong>in</strong>equalities related to gender,<br />

geography, location and class, etc. but the follow<strong>in</strong>g actions proposed will def<strong>in</strong>itely help to<br />

look forward and outward <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ward and backward:<br />

• The quality <strong>of</strong> education, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g up, has deteriorated over the years<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> the last two decades. Ma<strong>in</strong> reason <strong>of</strong> such a scenario is lack <strong>of</strong> proper<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g / learn<strong>in</strong>g environment <strong>in</strong> government schools. Tak<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>in</strong> education<br />

as <strong>in</strong>dependent variable, has many dependent variables <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g, adequate<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructural facilities, qualified, satisfied, competent, honest and motivated<br />

teachers, quality <strong>of</strong> curriculum and textbooks, Cisco-secure assessment and<br />

evaluation systems, knowledge-based school leadership, knowledge-based<br />

management and governance structures, community participation etc. Government<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must concentrate on quality, pre-service and <strong>in</strong>-service pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the teachers.<br />

• Percentage <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial budget and GDP, have been persistently lower than the<br />

target given <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> (1998-2010). The Government must enhance the<br />

sectoral allocation <strong>of</strong> education up to 6% <strong>of</strong> GDP now and subsequently enhance it<br />

further to ensure implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. With the<br />

devolution <strong>of</strong> education to prov<strong>in</strong>ces, better allocations are the rational expectation<br />

and recent allocations are the right step.<br />

• Efforts made <strong>in</strong> the recent past have positively impacted on access to education.<br />

There is <strong>in</strong>cessant need to br<strong>in</strong>g all school go<strong>in</strong>g age children to school and ensure<br />

their retention by m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the truancy. <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap will have a<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ite impact. <strong>Education</strong> sector <strong>in</strong>dicators need time to demonstrate results, the<br />

process be<strong>in</strong>g slow and gradual.<br />

• The Government must put <strong>in</strong> place scientifically designed, planned, program,<br />

orchestrated, chiseled and honed monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation system <strong>in</strong> place to<br />

ensure transparency and accountability. M&E staff should be qualified to monitor all<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> educational activities <strong>in</strong> an educational <strong>in</strong>stitution rang<strong>in</strong>g from classroom<br />

observations to the <strong>in</strong>spection <strong>of</strong> physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Recent <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

arrangements with the establishment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> DMOs have started impact<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> M&E and portents are very encourag<strong>in</strong>g. The endeavor needs<br />

consistency and cont<strong>in</strong>uity for ultimate success.<br />

• The academia should be so attractive <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> emoluments, em<strong>in</strong>ence and<br />

erudition that it is the first choice <strong>of</strong> the capable and outstand<strong>in</strong>g young men and<br />

women. In the ultimate analysis, it is the quality men and women and the bricks and<br />

mortar, to ensure quality education. The recent recruitment <strong>of</strong> 40,000 <strong>of</strong> educators <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> absolutely on merit <strong>in</strong> a transparent manner will go a long way for secure and<br />

quality service delivery mechanism <strong>in</strong> education sector.<br />

7.2.5: Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development <strong>of</strong> Teachers<br />

Every education system <strong>of</strong> excellence around the globe has one common thread runn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

through all along: all <strong>of</strong> them have qualified, satisfied, honest, motivated and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals,<br />

teachers and educational managers. The workable, viable and replicable education systems<br />

everywhere have educational managers with impeccable pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>in</strong>tegrity with ensured<br />

transparency <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> assessment and evaluation procedures dovetailed with objectively<br />

verifiable <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> outcomes and outputs. To ensure quality education, there<br />

141


has to be a nice mix <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional and governance arrangements. The quality <strong>of</strong> education<br />

is impacted by a host <strong>of</strong> factors. To manage the <strong>in</strong>evitable change <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> education<br />

and learn<strong>in</strong>g, the responsibility squarely falls on the shoulders <strong>of</strong> the teachers and the corpse<br />

<strong>of</strong> the educators <strong>in</strong> the respective <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> education along with other stakeholders.<br />

The central figure <strong>of</strong> the stage however rema<strong>in</strong>s the teacher and the teacher alone, around<br />

whom the whole set <strong>of</strong> activities, should naturally and rightly revolve. The student teacher<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction is the axle on which the quality revolves. The teachers and educators will<br />

therefore, have to prepare well to face the challenge <strong>of</strong> the change with the right enthusiasm<br />

and imbibed spirit. They will have to learn, unlearn and relearn to embrace the new<br />

technologies and knowledge management. There is a dire felt need <strong>of</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the didactic<br />

resource base <strong>of</strong> the teachers <strong>in</strong> pedagogy, andragogy and ensure the secure and superior<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the core content knowledge. The pr<strong>of</strong>essional development is assumed to<br />

register a positive and def<strong>in</strong>ite impact on the learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes <strong>of</strong> the students be<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

ultimate beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tervention and atta<strong>in</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> quality education. There is<br />

irrefutable evidence <strong>of</strong> chronic neglect and under <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development and capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> teachers. The follow<strong>in</strong>g factors are crucial for<br />

atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g quality education:<br />

• The physical teach<strong>in</strong>g-learn<strong>in</strong>g environment with positive externalities for<br />

maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the learn<strong>in</strong>g process, usefulness and relevance.<br />

• Improv<strong>in</strong>g the quality <strong>of</strong> teachers through pre-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at GCETs, DSD and<br />

UOE and ensure the participation <strong>of</strong> the recruited teachers <strong>in</strong> Cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Programs (CPDP). The teachers must attend CPDP with<br />

pre and post tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g tests to ensure the improvement <strong>in</strong> their didactic resource base.<br />

• Ensur<strong>in</strong>g teacher attendance <strong>in</strong> schools, improv<strong>in</strong>g enrolment and discourag<strong>in</strong>g dropouts,<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g gender parity, and improv<strong>in</strong>g exam<strong>in</strong>ation and assessment<br />

mechanism.<br />

• Address the locational disadvantages due to faulty location <strong>of</strong> schools and the<br />

physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure provided.<br />

• The multi-grade teach<strong>in</strong>g and multi-task<strong>in</strong>g is undertaken, mostly <strong>in</strong> rural areas, the<br />

teachers do not have the skill or tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for conduct<strong>in</strong>g these classes.<br />

• Comprehension and application <strong>of</strong> knowledge should be the purpose <strong>of</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>glearn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Pedagogy takes the form <strong>of</strong> rote learn<strong>in</strong>g and memorization rather than<br />

student-centered learn<strong>in</strong>g methods be<strong>in</strong>g adopted.<br />

• The curriculum was developed by the Curriculum W<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> but<br />

the textbooks were published by respective Textbook Boards. The curriculum needs<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous revision and up-gradation to encompass and <strong>in</strong>corporate the latest<br />

developments. The quality <strong>of</strong> text books needs to be improved <strong>in</strong> consultation with<br />

teachers. Moreover these should be accompanied by teachers’ guides. There has to<br />

be a national strategy on the cont<strong>in</strong>uous syllabus and curriculum, keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the<br />

ever expand<strong>in</strong>g frontiers <strong>of</strong> knowledge due to technological and sociological<br />

developments around the globe.<br />

• The availability <strong>of</strong> qualified, satisfied, competent, honest and motivated teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals accountable to the school management is the hallmark <strong>of</strong> quality<br />

education. The <strong>in</strong>centive-base salary structure l<strong>in</strong>ked with the performance is<br />

panacea for many ailments <strong>in</strong> education system. The coeducation environment at<br />

142


primary level which <strong>in</strong>culcates a feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> equality, better behavior, better<br />

citizenship, plurality, diversity and higher level <strong>of</strong> tolerance for the other gender.<br />

The recent re-structur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> DSD and UOE has <strong>in</strong>corporated all the essential <strong>in</strong>gredients for<br />

effective CPDP programmes. Over a period <strong>of</strong> last two years, commendable achievements<br />

are at the credit <strong>of</strong> the respective <strong>in</strong>stitutions. The cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>of</strong> the programmes with<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>in</strong>tegrity is the def<strong>in</strong>ite way forward for the pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

educators <strong>of</strong> the nations.<br />

7.2.6: Issues <strong>in</strong> Management and Governance <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

Governance is about government’s chang<strong>in</strong>g role <strong>in</strong> society and its chang<strong>in</strong>g capacity to<br />

pursue collective <strong>in</strong>terests under severe external and <strong>in</strong>ternal constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Governance is the<br />

process and <strong>in</strong>stitutions, both formal and <strong>in</strong>formal, that guide and restra<strong>in</strong> the collective<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> a group. Government is portion <strong>of</strong> the activity that acts with authority and<br />

creates formal obligations. Governance describes the process and <strong>in</strong>stitutions through which<br />

social action occurs, which might or might not be governmental. There is a famous adage<br />

that, ‘Whatever is measured is done’. Good governance entails def<strong>in</strong>ed roles and<br />

responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the functionaries <strong>in</strong> education sector and performance with impeccable<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity and honesty <strong>of</strong> purpose. This also <strong>in</strong>cludes the Pareto-optimal utilization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

available resources. Good governance focuses at performance <strong>in</strong>dicators with objectively<br />

verifiable <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uous monitor<strong>in</strong>g, evaluation and <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> experiences <strong>in</strong>to the system ensure<br />

good governance. All the activities put under spotlight ensure transparency and<br />

accountability <strong>in</strong> performance. Transparency means that decisions taken and their<br />

enforcement are done <strong>in</strong> a manner that follows rules and regulations. Accountability is a key<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> good governance. Not only governmental <strong>in</strong>stitutions but also the private<br />

sector and civil society organizations must be accountable to the public and to their<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional stakeholders. It also means that <strong>in</strong>formation is freely available and directly<br />

accessible to those who will be affected by such decisions and their enforcement. The role<br />

<strong>of</strong> District Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Committees and District Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Officers is crucial for ensur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

observance <strong>of</strong> the processes.<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> School Management Councils is pivotal to ensure good governance at school<br />

level. The concept <strong>of</strong> Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Evaluation (M&E) <strong>in</strong> education sector needs to be<br />

understood <strong>in</strong> the right perspective. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g does not mean polic<strong>in</strong>g or commandeer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> any sense <strong>of</strong> the word. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g rather ensures facilitation and to an extent regulation<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g M&E process. The monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves the monitor<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> the processes.<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cludes design monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> programs, process monitor<strong>in</strong>g, outcome<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g, formative monitor<strong>in</strong>g and summative monitor<strong>in</strong>g. In education sector effective<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g evaluation means the observations <strong>of</strong> the monitors and their evaluation<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the programs and the cont<strong>in</strong>uous enrichment and up-gradation <strong>of</strong> programs as<br />

a consequence. Good governance has eight essential characteristics.<br />

Good governance is participatory, consensus oriented, accountable, transparent, responsive,<br />

effective and efficient, equitable and <strong>in</strong>clusive and follows the rule <strong>of</strong> law. Good governance<br />

assures that corruption is m<strong>in</strong>imized, the views <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>orities are taken <strong>in</strong>to account and that<br />

143


the voices <strong>of</strong> the most vulnerable, less affluent and disenfranchised sections <strong>of</strong> society are<br />

heard <strong>in</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g. Good governance is responsive to the present and future needs <strong>of</strong><br />

society. Participation by both men and women is a key cornerstone <strong>of</strong> good governance.<br />

Participation through Good governance needs to be <strong>in</strong>formed and organized. This means<br />

freedom <strong>of</strong> association and expression on the one hand and an organized civil society on the<br />

other. Good governance requires fair legal frameworks that are enforced impartially. Good<br />

governance requires mediation <strong>of</strong> the different <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> society to reach a broad<br />

consensus <strong>in</strong> society.<br />

The <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap has already <strong>in</strong>troduced the benchmarks for transparency and<br />

good governance <strong>in</strong> education sector. The same zeal and spirit needs not only cont<strong>in</strong>uity but<br />

requires more <strong>in</strong>tense efforts to enhance the standards and galvanize the pace <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation. There is a fair chance <strong>of</strong> its success s<strong>in</strong>ce progress is be<strong>in</strong>g monitored at the<br />

highest political and bureaucratic echelons <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce i.e. Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>Punjab</strong>, Chief<br />

Secretary <strong>Punjab</strong>, Chairman P&D and respective Secretaries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Education</strong> Departments.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development <strong>of</strong> the educational managers has been a neglected area.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, <strong>in</strong> collaboration with Government College University,<br />

Management Studies Department has chalked out comprehensive programme for the<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> the educational managers <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives have worked wonders for enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the pr<strong>of</strong>essional and managerial capabilities<br />

<strong>of</strong> the educational managers. The cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development will help <strong>in</strong> better<br />

educational management. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has constituted Search Committee for<br />

the appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> EDOs <strong>in</strong> the Districts. The Search Committee has developed criteria and<br />

management tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at Government College University, Management Studies Department<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the most important <strong>in</strong>gredients. Consequently educational managers are more eager<br />

than ever before to jo<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional development programme at Government College<br />

University, Management Studies Department.<br />

7.2.7: F<strong>in</strong>ancial Allocations, Release <strong>of</strong> Funds and Utilization<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> public spend<strong>in</strong>g is a key <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> government's dedication and commitment<br />

to the cause <strong>of</strong> education. The education sector <strong>in</strong> Pakistan has suffered from persistent and<br />

acute under-<strong>in</strong>vestment by the government. Pakistan ranks amongst the bottom five<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> the world, so far as public expenditure on education, as a %age <strong>of</strong> total public<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g is concerned. The National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> (1998-2010), for the first time,<br />

established the target <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g expenditures on education from 2 to 4 % <strong>of</strong> the GDP by<br />

2010. However, actual expenditure on education has not <strong>in</strong>creased at the desired rate.<br />

Although, education enjoys the highest priority <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> Government, yet allocations<br />

for education sector do not depict consistent government choice for education sector, rather<br />

<strong>in</strong> relative terms it has been fall<strong>in</strong>g for last several years.<br />

The allocations become even more <strong>in</strong>effective when relevant departments and agencies fail<br />

to utilize them. Follow<strong>in</strong>g devolution, some districts suffered problems <strong>in</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sufficient funds from the prov<strong>in</strong>cial level to operate devolved functions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

education. This has <strong>in</strong>cluded delays <strong>in</strong> and transfer <strong>of</strong> sufficient funds for development.<br />

After devolution, districts have become operational tier <strong>of</strong> school education. The budgets at<br />

144


the district level reveal an unjust allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. The allocation by the district<br />

government for education is available for non-development expenditure like salaries and<br />

allowances <strong>of</strong> the employees and very little is left for development expenditure. For br<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able development <strong>in</strong> education sector, there is a need <strong>of</strong> permanent and well-regarded<br />

organization (Plann<strong>in</strong>g Cells <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Education</strong> Departments at Prov<strong>in</strong>cial and District level).<br />

The job requires a wide variety <strong>of</strong> experts, and cannot be done by a hastily assembled group,<br />

tasked to do plann<strong>in</strong>g like other rout<strong>in</strong>e functions. Cont<strong>in</strong>uous attention to performance is<br />

necessary and only specialists can do an effective job like plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The plann<strong>in</strong>g cells/units are function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> various departments deal<strong>in</strong>g education sector at<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial level. However, these are usually headed by generalists, posted to command<br />

demoralized planners, devoid <strong>of</strong> any <strong>in</strong>centive for work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a specialized field. There is<br />

an acute shortage <strong>of</strong> experienced planners and lack reliable <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>of</strong> statistical nature<br />

at district level. At the district level, performance <strong>of</strong> education departments is low because<br />

<strong>of</strong> a weak <strong>in</strong>formation base, poor and disconnected plann<strong>in</strong>g, weak understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> basic<br />

issues, lack <strong>of</strong> basic facilities and a virtually nonexistent monitor<strong>in</strong>g and support system.<br />

The expansion <strong>of</strong> duties and responsibilities at the district level with devolution, underl<strong>in</strong>es<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g a good district management <strong>in</strong>formation system. Although EMIS<br />

units have been established <strong>in</strong> districts, the district <strong>of</strong>fices still lack sufficiently tra<strong>in</strong>ed and<br />

experienced staff to make them effective. Unfortunately, many development plans set forth<br />

by the government are to be implemented by the people work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> districts, those do not<br />

have the necessary experience for plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The unprecedented devastat<strong>in</strong>g floods <strong>in</strong> 2010 severely impacted all the development<br />

programmes <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g education sector.<br />

7.2.8: Implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A and Jo<strong>in</strong>t Declaration for <strong>Education</strong><br />

The Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong> Pakistan along with the top political leadership from Prov<strong>in</strong>ces,<br />

Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir resolved on September 16, 2011 that:<br />

• The Federal and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Governments reaffirm their commitment to<br />

<strong>Education</strong> as a priority.<br />

• National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2009, subject to such adaptations as are necessitated <strong>in</strong><br />

view <strong>of</strong> the 18 th Constitutional Amendment shall cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be jo<strong>in</strong>tly owned<br />

national document.<br />

• <strong>Education</strong> is a fundamental right <strong>of</strong> all children aged 5-16, guaranteed through<br />

Article 25A <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

"Constitutional Amendment, which received assent on April 19, 2010; Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Governments shall enact legislation for the implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25A.<br />

• Each prov<strong>in</strong>ce/area shall develop an Action Plan which shall commit to<br />

appropriately raise allocations for education. set priorities accord<strong>in</strong>g to prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> access and quality <strong>of</strong> education and provide implementation<br />

strategies/processes with timeframe and key <strong>in</strong>dicators; ensure fulfillment <strong>of</strong><br />

constitutional needs with respect to education and meet the <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

commitments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g targets <strong>of</strong> Millennium Development Goals (MOGs) and<br />

<strong>Education</strong> for All (EFA)<br />

• The Plann<strong>in</strong>g System (the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Plann<strong>in</strong>g Departments,<br />

145


146<br />

and <strong>Education</strong> Departments) shall be jo<strong>in</strong>tly the secretariat for the <strong>Education</strong><br />

M<strong>in</strong>ister’s Conference.<br />

After 18 th Amendment <strong>in</strong> the Constitution, the Jo<strong>in</strong>t Declaration at the highest level is a very<br />

good omen for a political resolve for implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A.<br />

The situation analysis <strong>in</strong>dicates that the discourse and policy debate on the 18th<br />

Constitutional Amendment needs to be <strong>in</strong>formed with evidence-based solutions and<br />

proposals for respond<strong>in</strong>g to the educational challenges that Pakistan faces. 18th<br />

Constitutional Amendment has sufficiently empowered the prov<strong>in</strong>ces and ensured free<br />

education for the children <strong>of</strong> five to sixteen years <strong>of</strong> age as an enforceable right. There is a<br />

need to broaden the debate so that it encompasses technical, political, and policy aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

the new education governance framework given by the 18th Constitutional Amendment.<br />

Prima facie the ongo<strong>in</strong>g debate is largely centered on the issues <strong>of</strong> relationship between the<br />

federat<strong>in</strong>g units and the federation at the cost <strong>of</strong> discuss<strong>in</strong>g possible national response to the<br />

educational challenges. The ‘national response’ as a matter <strong>of</strong> fact is aggregated response <strong>of</strong><br />

all federat<strong>in</strong>g units, i.e., federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments and constituent regions to<br />

articulate a response to the shared problems <strong>of</strong> access, equity, and quality <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong><br />

Pakistan. Such national response needs to be articulated <strong>in</strong> a manner that respects cultural<br />

diversity and autonomy <strong>of</strong> the federat<strong>in</strong>g units and is yet responsive to the diverse<br />

educational problems <strong>of</strong> Pakistan with<strong>in</strong> the newly <strong>in</strong>troduced education governance<br />

framework under the 18th Constitutional Amendment. On the basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ferences drawn<br />

from the present situation analysis it is recommended that after the dissolution <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, the federal government needs to create a coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g vector for perform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

its role. An elaborate coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g vector needs to be created at federal level.<br />

The recently developed National Curriculum is a consensually adopted document and<br />

should stay as the foundation document that can support the prov<strong>in</strong>cial curriculum<br />

development <strong>in</strong> the aftermath <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> the 18 th Amendment. It seems<br />

imperative that a central mechanism for coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> curriculum framework should be<br />

created. In the context <strong>of</strong> curriculum the devolution <strong>of</strong> the subject will result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

responsibility for the prov<strong>in</strong>cial education departments for develop<strong>in</strong>g, prepar<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

updat<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g curriculum.<br />

The federal government would also need to revise the <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements for<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g and prepar<strong>in</strong>g curriculum for the capital territory and the federally controlled<br />

areas. Formation <strong>of</strong> a broad-based National Council <strong>of</strong> Curriculum and Standards should be<br />

formed with membership <strong>of</strong> all the prov<strong>in</strong>ces, pr<strong>of</strong>essional organizations. The Council can<br />

be adm<strong>in</strong>istratively placed under the ambit <strong>of</strong> Cab<strong>in</strong>et Division or the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

Interprov<strong>in</strong>cial Coord<strong>in</strong>ation. On the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> equitable development the federal<br />

government needs to earmark resources for award to prov<strong>in</strong>ces for the compliance <strong>of</strong><br />

constitutional obligation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A.<br />

Federal government needs to support prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments for further<strong>in</strong>g the national<br />

cause and for this purpose a paradigm shift is suggested by creation <strong>of</strong> multiple <strong>in</strong>centive<br />

regimes based on performance and equity. At prov<strong>in</strong>cial as well as federal levels strong


political will is needed for susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g average annual <strong>in</strong>crease on education budget. The<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial education departments need to undertake f<strong>in</strong>ancial projections to estimate the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources required for realiz<strong>in</strong>g the compliance <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A as projected by<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>in</strong> the situation analysis. The prov<strong>in</strong>cial education departments should improve the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial absorptive capacity by enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the ability to spend efficiently and effectively.<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial education departments should immediately undertake the task <strong>of</strong> legislation for<br />

supervision <strong>of</strong> curriculum and textbooks, and centers <strong>of</strong> excellence. The prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

education departments also need to revisit the exist<strong>in</strong>g legal and <strong>in</strong>stitutional framework for<br />

Textbook Boards. Prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>Education</strong> Secretariats need to be strengthened to take on the<br />

newly devolved roles and responsibilities. Besides the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative sections, <strong>in</strong><br />

anticipation <strong>of</strong> the devolved functions, special considerations are required for establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> policy and plann<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>gs. The departments should prepare revised rules <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong><br />

anticipation <strong>of</strong> new roles with subsequent approval <strong>of</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial cab<strong>in</strong>ets. The<br />

devolution <strong>of</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> policy and plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> education does not amount to do<strong>in</strong>g away<br />

with the National <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> 2009. It should stay as the core national document. The<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces should formulate prov<strong>in</strong>cial education policies with sectoral plann<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

The policies should be formulated <strong>in</strong> the comprehensive framework suggested <strong>in</strong> the NEP<br />

2009.The implementation <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>in</strong> the Constitution needs further legislation by the<br />

respective prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has already drafted the<br />

legislation, shortly to be placed before the Cab<strong>in</strong>et and Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Assembly. The endeavor<br />

needs priority at the highest level.<br />

7.2.9: Emphasis on Literacy and Adult <strong>Education</strong><br />

Allocation <strong>of</strong> the resources and right <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangement for the promotion <strong>of</strong> literacy<br />

and adult education is s<strong>in</strong>e quo none. There is also a question <strong>of</strong> what priority literacy<br />

promotion should be given <strong>in</strong> the public budget when resources are not available for basic<br />

facilities <strong>in</strong> the primary schools, although the private sector can contribute resources <strong>in</strong> this<br />

field <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g. The case for improv<strong>in</strong>g literacy is based on both its economic and social<br />

benefits, quite apart from the large benefit that accrues to the <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong><br />

personal development. In the economic field, literacy scores contribute to higher<br />

productivity, a contribution that is <strong>in</strong> addition to the contribution made by years <strong>of</strong><br />

school<strong>in</strong>g. The most important social objective served by literacy is achiev<strong>in</strong>g greater social<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusiveness.<br />

There are four ma<strong>in</strong> difficulties with current literacy and non-formal learn<strong>in</strong>g programme,<br />

which needs to be addressed. First, the quality <strong>of</strong> such programmes is variable as they are<br />

not regulated by some m<strong>in</strong>imum quality standards. One reason for the <strong>of</strong>ten poor quality <strong>of</strong><br />

the programmes is low quality <strong>of</strong> teachers, which is also not regulated. Second, a<br />

certification and accreditation regime is miss<strong>in</strong>g. There are no bench marks or standards that<br />

can be used for assess<strong>in</strong>g literacy programmes. As a consequence, it is difficult to l<strong>in</strong>k the<br />

certificate <strong>of</strong>fered by these programmes to formal learn<strong>in</strong>g opportunities. Hence, graduates<br />

<strong>of</strong> these programmes f<strong>in</strong>d it difficult to enter <strong>in</strong> to the formal sector. Third, current literacy<br />

programmes are also not well-l<strong>in</strong>ked to employment opportunities. Fourth, literacy<br />

programmes are <strong>of</strong>ten found to be effective if there is a follow-up programme <strong>of</strong><br />

re<strong>in</strong>forcement, which are lack<strong>in</strong>g at present. Recently, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> has<br />

enhanced resource allocation to L&NFBED. There is a need to scale up the literacy and<br />

147


vocational skill programmes accord<strong>in</strong>g highest priority keep<strong>in</strong>g view the huge illiterate<br />

population <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

7.2.10: Special <strong>Education</strong> for Special Children<br />

The repose and response <strong>of</strong> a responsible society is gauged by level <strong>of</strong> the responsibility,<br />

accorded to the education <strong>of</strong> Special Children. Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> has established a<br />

separate Special <strong>Education</strong> Department to address the needs <strong>of</strong> Special Children. The<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g actions are immediately required to be accomplished accord<strong>in</strong>g top priority:<br />

1. Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g, expansion and up-gradation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g educational facilities and<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> technical and f<strong>in</strong>ancial support <strong>of</strong> civil society organizations provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

education to special children.<br />

2. Promotion <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusive education system to provide educational facilities to the<br />

special students at their doorsteps and to ensure maximum coverage and provision <strong>of</strong><br />

allied services, like provision <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation services, sports facilities, vocational<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, IT education etc.<br />

3. Establishment <strong>of</strong> database centers regard<strong>in</strong>g prevalence <strong>of</strong> disability and problems<br />

confront<strong>in</strong>g with Persons with Disabilities and ensur<strong>in</strong>g maximum coverage <strong>of</strong><br />

special students for provid<strong>in</strong>g them educational facilities.<br />

4. Preparation <strong>of</strong> policy on education for children with disabilities and development <strong>of</strong><br />

curriculum <strong>in</strong> accordance with the needs <strong>of</strong> special students.<br />

5. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> teachers and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals work<strong>in</strong>g for special students and services for<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> disability.<br />

6. I.T. education for students with disabilities and Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Technical<br />

<strong>Education</strong> for special students, sports for special students, establishment <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Centre, public awareness for disability related issues, coord<strong>in</strong>ation with relevant<br />

stakeholders for education, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> special students, availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> rehabilitative services for special students, creation <strong>of</strong> disability friendly<br />

environment for special students, strengthen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Public Private Partnership for<br />

education <strong>of</strong> children with disabilities, enhancement <strong>of</strong> enrolment through provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs with special facilities to special education centers, Cochlear Implant<br />

Devices to Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired Students, up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Institutions / Centers <strong>of</strong><br />

Special <strong>Education</strong>, stipend , free uniform , free text & Braille books, free pick &<br />

drop facility, merit scholarship and free board<strong>in</strong>g and lodg<strong>in</strong>g facility<br />

7. Adoption <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally accepted best practices, establishment <strong>of</strong> Technical &<br />

Vocational Institutions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong>, establishment <strong>of</strong> Computer Labs with<br />

Assistive Technology and data base center for the disabled<br />

7.2.11: Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong> (TVE) is one the weakest l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> our education system.<br />

As a result there is grave mismatch between demand and quality skills is clear from labor<br />

survey over the period which <strong>in</strong>dicates that 59.2% <strong>of</strong> the unemployed are literate or semiliterate.<br />

33.6% <strong>of</strong> the labor force possesses less than 1 year <strong>of</strong> education while 70% has less<br />

than 8 years <strong>of</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

148


The subject <strong>of</strong> technical and vocational education is be<strong>in</strong>g dealt by two organizations <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> i.e. Technical and Vocation <strong>Education</strong> Authority (TEVTA) and <strong>Punjab</strong> Vocational<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Council (PVTC). TEVTA was formed through an Ord<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong> 1999 which has<br />

now become an Act <strong>of</strong> Legislature, ‘TEVTA Act 2010’. TEVTA is responsible for<br />

apprenticeship programme implementation under Apprenticeship Ord<strong>in</strong>ance. TEVTA is also<br />

responsible for national level coord<strong>in</strong>ation with all Governments and Private Sector<br />

Stakeholders. It’s a regulatory body for private sector <strong>in</strong>stitution <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> and is controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

body <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Technical <strong>Education</strong> and Trade Test<strong>in</strong>g Board Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Bodies<br />

that affiliate Technical and Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institutions. TEVTA works outside the<br />

P&D and F<strong>in</strong>ance Department procedures <strong>in</strong> Development Plann<strong>in</strong>g. A s<strong>in</strong>gle l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

development grant is allocated to TEVTA from the ADP and flexibility to work outside the<br />

normal Government bus<strong>in</strong>ess process is allowed s<strong>in</strong>ce Government procedures are at times<br />

cumbersome and cause delay <strong>in</strong> implementation<br />

After the 18 th Amendment the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Technical<br />

<strong>Education</strong>, is now a prov<strong>in</strong>cial subject. Pakistan is suffer<strong>in</strong>g from both skills shortage and<br />

skills gap. The total number <strong>of</strong> persons enrolled <strong>in</strong> Technical and Vocation Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Institutes is only 1.3% <strong>of</strong> about 300000/- people <strong>in</strong> the age cohort <strong>of</strong> 14-19. The %age is<br />

dangerously low when compared with numbers <strong>of</strong> 35-60% for OECD Countries and 6-20%<br />

for the Asia Pacific Economies. There is a major mismatch between desired and actual<br />

quality levels and relevance.<br />

Pakistan’s growth and development is limited by lack <strong>of</strong> competence <strong>in</strong> both hard and s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

skills. The nature <strong>of</strong> work and demands for skills is chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Pakistan and employment<br />

opportunities are shift<strong>in</strong>g across <strong>in</strong>dustries and occupations. The pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Pakistani<br />

workforce <strong>in</strong> 2008 shows share <strong>of</strong> employment <strong>in</strong> Agriculture 43%, services 36% and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry 20%. National survey also <strong>in</strong>dicate that over 8 million workers have moved away<br />

from Agriculture <strong>in</strong>to services and <strong>in</strong>dustry s<strong>in</strong>ce 1995, with the service sector observ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nearly 55% <strong>of</strong> such persons. This has to be seen <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> a steady migration from<br />

Rural to Urban areas.<br />

There is a dire need and <strong>in</strong>cessant demand for TVE <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

has chalked out a strategy for implementation by PVTC and TEVTA. The implementation<br />

process needs acceleration <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> more number <strong>of</strong> TVE Institutions and enhancement <strong>in</strong><br />

enrollment. PVTC and TEVTA have already identified market based skills <strong>in</strong> consultation<br />

with the <strong>in</strong>dustrialist and entrepreneurs. Both the organizations have developed l<strong>in</strong>kages<br />

with the <strong>in</strong>ternational best <strong>in</strong>stitutions renowned <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> TVE. Keep<strong>in</strong>g the present<br />

pace <strong>of</strong> expansion <strong>in</strong> PVTC and TEVTA, there is a clear roadmap and hope that the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives will work as a maverick for the promotion <strong>of</strong> TVE <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

7.2.12: Needs, Target Groups and Strategies<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g tables <strong>in</strong>dicate analysis <strong>of</strong> the needs, target groups and strategies for different<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> education <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>:<br />

149


Table 100: Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong><br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong><br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> Pre-Primary age 1. Introduc<strong>in</strong>g ECE Classes <strong>in</strong> all Public and Private Schools<br />

well-resourced preprimary<br />

group 3-5 years 2. Start ECE Classes <strong>in</strong> Foundation Assisted Schools <strong>of</strong> PEF<br />

(katchi<br />

3. ECE Classes <strong>in</strong> Non-Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Schools <strong>of</strong><br />

classes)<br />

Literacy and Non-Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong> Department.<br />

4. Improvements <strong>in</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> ECE must be based on a<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> holistic development <strong>of</strong> the child that provides a<br />

stimulat<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>teractive environment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g play, rather than<br />

a focus on regimes that require rote learn<strong>in</strong>g and rigid<br />

achievement standards.<br />

5. ECE age group should be recognized as compris<strong>in</strong>g 3 to 5 years.<br />

6. At least one year pre-primary education should be provided by<br />

the State and universal access to ECE should be ensured with<strong>in</strong><br />

the next ten years.<br />

Admission <strong>of</strong><br />

Children <strong>of</strong> ages<br />

3-5 years <strong>in</strong> ECE<br />

Classes<br />

Hir<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

capacity build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> ECE teachers<br />

Pre-Primary<br />

group 3-5 years<br />

ECE Teachers<br />

age<br />

1. Admission campaign<br />

2. Advocacy among parents and communities<br />

3. <strong>Policy</strong> for ECE by the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

1. Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Development to teach ECE Classes<br />

2. Development <strong>of</strong> curriculum and syllabus for ECE Classes<br />

3. Specialized tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for ECE Teachers on the pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

educators for primary, elementary and science subjects.<br />

4. ECE should be attached to primary schools which shall be<br />

provided with additional budget, teachers and assistants for this<br />

purpose<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> Private<br />

Sector<br />

ECE<br />

ECE is well systematized <strong>in</strong> the private sector and is an <strong>in</strong>tegral part<br />

<strong>of</strong> primary education. ECE comprises preparatory, nursery,<br />

K<strong>in</strong>dergarten, playgroup and Montessori style <strong>of</strong> education. The<br />

enrollment age <strong>in</strong> all such schools is 3-5 years. Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> must support and encourage the policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g ECE<br />

classes not only <strong>in</strong> Government Primary Schools but also encourage<br />

and support the private sector.<br />

Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

Pre-Primary age<br />

group 3-5 years and<br />

ECE Teachers<br />

1. Budgetary allocations for ECE Classes<br />

2. Salary <strong>of</strong> ECE Teachers<br />

3. Provision <strong>of</strong> Textbooks for ECE Classes<br />

4. Accommodation for ECE Classes<br />

150


151<br />

Table 101: Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Primary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Access Universal Primary 1 Ensure 100% enrollment and retention <strong>in</strong> primary schools<br />

<strong>Education</strong> and 2 Strategy to honor the pledge to meet MDG/EFA Goals<br />

meet MDG/EFA 3 Implement Article 25-A <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Goals<br />

Pakistan<br />

4 Ensure access to all students to schools <strong>in</strong> the age cohort <strong>of</strong> 5-9 years<br />

5 Open more schools <strong>in</strong> public sector at primary level<br />

6 Recruit more educators at primary level<br />

7 Ensure enabl<strong>in</strong>g environment by appropriate accommodation and other<br />

facilities<br />

8 Encourage private sector <strong>in</strong> education<br />

9 Enhance capacity <strong>of</strong> PEF <strong>in</strong> order to enter <strong>in</strong>to partnership with more<br />

low cost schools <strong>in</strong> remote rural areas and urban slums to ensure<br />

enrollment and retention<br />

10 Enhance the capacity <strong>of</strong> Literacy and Non-Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department to enroll students <strong>in</strong> those areas where no primary school is<br />

available <strong>in</strong> public or private sector<br />

11 Equal opportunity for male and female students <strong>in</strong> rural and urban areas<br />

12 Ensure improvement <strong>in</strong> enrollment and discourage drop-outs<br />

13 Improv<strong>in</strong>g gender parity and assessment mechanism<br />

14 Address locational disadvantages due to faulty location <strong>of</strong> schools and<br />

the physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

15 Avoid multi-grade teach<strong>in</strong>g and multi-task<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> primary school<br />

teachers<br />

16 Cont<strong>in</strong>uous revision <strong>of</strong> curriculum and up-gradation to encompass and<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporate the latest developments<br />

17 Quality <strong>of</strong> textbooks should be improved <strong>in</strong> consultation with teachers<br />

Quality Improve supply 1. Qualified, satisfied, competent, experiential practitioners <strong>in</strong> education at<br />

side <strong>in</strong>puts<br />

primary level<br />

2. Appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> graduate educators at primary level through a<br />

transparent process<br />

3. Special aptitude <strong>of</strong> teachers for teach<strong>in</strong>g primary classes must be kept <strong>in</strong><br />

view<br />

4. Recruitment <strong>of</strong> teachers absolutely on merit <strong>in</strong> a transparent manners<br />

5. Enhance quality <strong>in</strong>puts at the level <strong>of</strong> pre-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

teachers at DSD and GCETs<br />

6. Improve curriculum and textbooks <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the latest knowledge<br />

7. Ensure cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> teachers through <strong>in</strong>service<br />

teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

8. Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Development and ensure participation <strong>of</strong> teachers <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development programme for the improvement <strong>of</strong> their<br />

didactic resource base<br />

Equity<br />

Equal Opportunity<br />

for Quality<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

9. Ensure teacher attendance <strong>in</strong> schools<br />

1. Equal opportunities and fair access for all students<br />

2. Quality schools and education <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> rural and urban areas<br />

3. Uniformity <strong>in</strong> syllabus and exam<strong>in</strong>ation system to provide a level<br />

play<strong>in</strong>g field


Governance<br />

Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

<strong>Education</strong>al<br />

Institutions<br />

Communities<br />

and<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

4. Equality <strong>of</strong> opportunities<br />

5. Avoid class divide and educational apartheid<br />

6. No discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> any form for admission to all <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

7. Provision <strong>of</strong> quality education to most deprived and marg<strong>in</strong>alized<br />

segment <strong>of</strong> society<br />

8. Comb<strong>in</strong>e the best features <strong>of</strong> traditional education with prime focus on<br />

science subject<br />

9. Developed student’s <strong>in</strong>tellect and character enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to make<br />

purpose for contribution for National Development<br />

10. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Danish School System and Centers <strong>of</strong> Excellence is<br />

the right step <strong>in</strong> the right direction. There is a need to scale up the<br />

project and open more schools <strong>in</strong> less affluent and marg<strong>in</strong>alized areas <strong>of</strong><br />

the prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

1. School Management Councils<br />

2. Impeccable system <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation<br />

3. Participatory and consensus oriented but accountable system <strong>of</strong> good<br />

governance<br />

4. Implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap<br />

5. Post<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> EDOs through search committees<br />

6. Avoid political <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

7. Managerial tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the educational managers<br />

8. Participation through good governance needs to be <strong>in</strong>formed, organized<br />

and responsive<br />

1. Enhance the budget pie for primary education<br />

2. Provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure facilities<br />

3. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Libraries<br />

4. Transport facilities<br />

152<br />

Table 102: Elementary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Elementary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Access Cont<strong>in</strong>uity and 1. Open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> more Middle Schools and up-gradation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g primary<br />

Retention <strong>of</strong> schools<br />

Students<br />

2. Provision <strong>of</strong> Science and IT Labs<br />

3. Equal opportunity for male and female students <strong>in</strong> rural and urban areas<br />

4. Ensure the establishment <strong>of</strong> Middle Schools to accommodate all the<br />

students from male and female feed<strong>in</strong>g primary schools<br />

5. Ensure that distance to Middle schools is not a barrier for female<br />

students<br />

6. Ensure adequate arrangements for transport facilities Strategy to honor<br />

the pledge to meet MDG/EFA Goals<br />

7. Implement Article 25-A <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Pakistan<br />

Quality Improve supply 1. Appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> post- graduate educators through a transparent manners<br />

side <strong>in</strong>puts 2. Qualified, satisfied, competent, experiential practitioners <strong>in</strong> education<br />

3. Ensure selection <strong>of</strong> the best teachers to teach at Elementary level<br />

4. Recruitment <strong>of</strong> teachers absolutely on merit <strong>in</strong> a transparent manners<br />

5. Enhance quality <strong>in</strong>puts at the level <strong>of</strong> pre-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

teachers at DSD and GCETs<br />

6. Improve curriculum and textbooks <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the latest knowledge<br />

7. Ensure cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> teachers through <strong>in</strong>service<br />

teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g


Equity<br />

Equal<br />

Opportunities<br />

Students<br />

for<br />

8. Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Development<br />

9. Textbooks especially <strong>in</strong> Science subjects must have teacher’s guides<br />

10. National strategy on the cont<strong>in</strong>uous syllabus and curriculum<br />

improvement keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the expend<strong>in</strong>g frontiers <strong>of</strong> knowledge due<br />

to technological and sociological developments around the globe<br />

11. Incentive-based salary structure l<strong>in</strong>ked with the performance<br />

1. Equal opportunities and fair access for all students at Elementary level<br />

2. Introduce career counsel<strong>in</strong>g for students<br />

3. Quality schools and education <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> rural and urban areas to<br />

avoid drop-outs<br />

4. Uniformity <strong>in</strong> syllabus and exam<strong>in</strong>ation system to provide a level<br />

play<strong>in</strong>g field<br />

5. Equality <strong>of</strong> opportunities for male and female students<br />

6. No discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> any form for admission to all <strong>in</strong>stitutions at<br />

Elementary level<br />

7. Provision <strong>of</strong> quality education to most deprived and marg<strong>in</strong>alized<br />

segment <strong>of</strong> society<br />

8. Comb<strong>in</strong>e the best features <strong>of</strong> traditional education with prime focus on<br />

science subjects to enable the students to access requisite pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

fields<br />

9. Developed student’s <strong>in</strong>tellect and character enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to make<br />

purpose for contribution for National Development<br />

Governance<br />

Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

<strong>Education</strong>al<br />

Institutions<br />

Communities<br />

Government<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

and<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

1. School Management Councils<br />

2. Impeccable system <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation<br />

3. Participatory and consensus oriented but accountable system <strong>of</strong> good<br />

governance<br />

4. Implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap<br />

5. Post<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> EDOs through search committees<br />

6. Avoid political <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

7. Managerial tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the educational managers<br />

8. Participation through good governance needs to be <strong>in</strong>formed, organized<br />

and responsive<br />

1. Enhance the budget pie for elementary education<br />

2. Provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure facilities and science labs<br />

3. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Libraries and IT labs<br />

4. Transport facilities<br />

153<br />

Table 103: Secondary <strong>Education</strong><br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Access Expansion to<br />

Accommodate<br />

Students at<br />

Secondary Level<br />

Secondary <strong>Education</strong><br />

1. Expand the narrow base and keep the enrollment high at Secondary<br />

level especially for the female students<br />

2. Counsel<strong>in</strong>g facilities for students for their career plann<strong>in</strong>g and solve<br />

their psychological problems<br />

3. Number <strong>of</strong> Secondary schools suddenly drops when compared to<br />

Elementary and Primary schools. Rationalization for schools at<br />

Secondary level compatible enough to accommodate graduat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

students from Elementary level is required<br />

4. Open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> more Secondary Schools and up-gradation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Middle schools<br />

5. Provision <strong>of</strong> Science and IT Labs


Quality Improve supply<br />

side <strong>in</strong>puts and<br />

ensure congenial<br />

environment<br />

Equity<br />

Governance<br />

154<br />

Equal<br />

Opportunities for<br />

Students<br />

<strong>Education</strong>al<br />

Institutions and<br />

Communities<br />

6. Equal opportunity for male and female students <strong>in</strong> rural and urban areas<br />

7. Ensure the establishment <strong>of</strong> Secondary Schools to accommodate all the<br />

students from male and female feed<strong>in</strong>g Elementary schools<br />

8. Ensure that distance to Secondary schools is not a barrier for female<br />

students<br />

9. Ensure adequate arrangements for transport facilities Strategy to honor<br />

the pledge to meet MDG/EFA Goals<br />

10. Implement Article 25-A <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Pakistan<br />

1. Well-equipped Science laboratories (Physic, Chemistry and Biology) at<br />

Secondary level<br />

2. Well-equipped IT labs<br />

3. Provision <strong>of</strong> Libraries<br />

4. Appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> qualified, satisfied, competent, experiential practitioners<br />

as subject specialists through <strong>Punjab</strong> Public Service Commission <strong>in</strong><br />

education<br />

5. Ensure selection <strong>of</strong> the best teachers to teach at Elementary level<br />

6. Recruitment <strong>of</strong> teachers absolutely on merit <strong>in</strong> a transparent manners<br />

7. Enhance quality <strong>in</strong>puts at the level <strong>of</strong> pre-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the teachers<br />

at DSD, GCETs and UOE<br />

8. Improve curriculum and textbooks <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the latest knowledge<br />

9. Ensure cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> teachers<br />

10. Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Development<br />

11. More <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional development and capacity<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the teachers<br />

12. Enhance the capacity <strong>of</strong> the teachers <strong>in</strong> pedagogy and comprehension to<br />

ensure secure understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the core content knowledge<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> teachers registers a positive and def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

impact on the learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes <strong>of</strong> the students be<strong>in</strong>g the ultimate<br />

beneficiaries<br />

14. Recent restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> DSD, GCETs and UOE is the right step and<br />

needs to be a regular feature for effective teacher’s tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

15. Cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>-service teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programmes is the def<strong>in</strong>ite way<br />

forward for pr<strong>of</strong>essional development <strong>of</strong> educators at Secondary level<br />

1. Equal opportunities and fair access for all students at Secondary level<br />

2. Introduce career counsel<strong>in</strong>g for students<br />

3. Quality schools and education <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> rural and urban areas to<br />

avoid drop-outs<br />

4. Uniformity <strong>in</strong> syllabus and exam<strong>in</strong>ation system to provide a level<br />

play<strong>in</strong>g field<br />

5. Equality <strong>of</strong> opportunities for male and female students<br />

6. No discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> any form for admission to all <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

7. Provision <strong>of</strong> quality education to most deprived and marg<strong>in</strong>alized<br />

segment <strong>of</strong> society<br />

8. Comb<strong>in</strong>e the best features <strong>of</strong> traditional education with prime focus on<br />

science subjects to enable the students to access requisite pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

fields<br />

9. Developed student’s <strong>in</strong>tellect and character enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to make<br />

purpose for contribution for National Development<br />

1. School Management Councils<br />

2. Impeccable system <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation<br />

3. Participatory and consensus oriented but accountable system <strong>of</strong> good<br />

governance<br />

4. Implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap<br />

5. Post<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> EDOs through search committees


Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

Government<br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

6. Avoid political <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

7. Managerial tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the educational managers<br />

8. Participation through good governance needs to be <strong>in</strong>formed, organized<br />

and responsive<br />

1. More secondary schools<br />

2. Better salaries for teachers<br />

3. Conducive teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />

4. Provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure facilities and science labs<br />

5. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Libraries and IT labs<br />

6. Transport facilities<br />

155<br />

Table 104: Higher Secondary <strong>Education</strong> and Intermediate Colleges<br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Higher Secondary Schools & Intermediate Colleges<br />

Access Enhance<br />

1. Up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Secondary schools to accommodate students closer to<br />

Enrollment at their homes<br />

Higher Secondary<br />

Level<br />

2. Gender parity at Higher Secondary level<br />

3. Expand the narrow base and keep the enrollment high at Higher<br />

Secondary level especially for the female students<br />

4. Institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learn<strong>in</strong>g should be encouraged and<br />

Quality Improve supply<br />

side <strong>in</strong>puts for<br />

quality education<br />

Equity<br />

Governance<br />

Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

Equal<br />

Opportunities for<br />

Students<br />

<strong>Education</strong>al<br />

Institutions<br />

Government<br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

supported to generate <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights<br />

1. Appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> qualified, satisfied, competent, experiential<br />

practitioners <strong>in</strong> education at Higher Secondary level through <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Public Service Commission<br />

2. Introduce system <strong>of</strong> pre-service and <strong>in</strong>-service pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development <strong>of</strong> Lecturers and Pr<strong>of</strong>essors<br />

3. A broad-based education system must be developed to ensure that<br />

under graduates have not only mastered their respective areas <strong>of</strong><br />

specialization but are also able to effectively <strong>in</strong>teract with people<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g a wide variety <strong>of</strong> backgrounds.<br />

1. Equal opportunities and fair access for all students<br />

2. Equality <strong>of</strong> opportunities for male and female students<br />

3. No discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> any form for admission to all <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

4. Provision <strong>of</strong> quality education to most deprived and marg<strong>in</strong>alized<br />

segment <strong>of</strong> society<br />

5. Developed student’s <strong>in</strong>tellect and character enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to make<br />

purpose for contribution for National Development<br />

1. Introduce the system <strong>of</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Governors<br />

2. Members <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Governors should be em<strong>in</strong>ent local citizens<br />

3. Impeccable system <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation by the <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department and Board <strong>of</strong> Governors<br />

4. Avoid political <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

5. Managerial tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the educational managers and capacity build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Governors<br />

1. Level <strong>of</strong> public spend<strong>in</strong>g for education is a key <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong><br />

Government’s dedication and commitments<br />

2. <strong>Education</strong> sector has suffered from persistent and equipped hundred<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

3. More Higher Secondary Schools and Intermediate Colleges to<br />

accommodate students graduat<strong>in</strong>g at Secondary level<br />

4. Better salaries for teachers<br />

5. Conducive teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />

6. Provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure facilities and science labs


7. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Libraries and IT labs<br />

8. Transport facilities<br />

Table 105: Higher <strong>Education</strong><br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Higher <strong>Education</strong><br />

Access Higher <strong>Education</strong> is<br />

a Capital<br />

Investment:<br />

Open<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

Institutions to<br />

ensure better<br />

enrollment<br />

Quality Enhance the<br />

Concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

Knowledge Workers<br />

156<br />

1. Need-based scholarship programs shall be developed and <strong>in</strong>stituted<br />

to enhance equitable access to higher education.<br />

2. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Degree Colleges as centers <strong>of</strong> excellence<br />

3. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Universities as premier <strong>in</strong>stitutions for research and<br />

dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> knowledge through publications <strong>in</strong> National and<br />

International Journals <strong>of</strong> repute and erudition<br />

4. L<strong>in</strong>kages among <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>of</strong> higher education at national, regional<br />

and <strong>in</strong>ternational level. Opportunities for collaboration with the<br />

world scholarly community should be provided for both postgraduate<br />

students and faculty alike.<br />

5. Capital <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> higher educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

6. Higher <strong>Education</strong> Institutions shall be a focus on knowledge<br />

mobilization and transmission <strong>of</strong> research knowledge through<br />

various forms <strong>of</strong> university-<strong>in</strong>dustry partnerships and <strong>in</strong>cubator<br />

programmes and science parks to the bus<strong>in</strong>ess sector.<br />

7. Television channels should be dedicated to the delivery <strong>of</strong> highquality<br />

distance education programmes.<br />

8. ICT must be effectively leveraged to deliver high quality teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and research support <strong>in</strong> higher education both on-campus and<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g distance education, provid<strong>in</strong>g access to technical and scholarly<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation resources, and facilitat<strong>in</strong>g scholarly communication<br />

between researchers and teachers.<br />

9. Science based education at the bachelors level, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional degree programmes, shall conta<strong>in</strong> subjects <strong>in</strong> social<br />

sciences to allow the graduates to develop a more balanced world<br />

view.<br />

10. Exist<strong>in</strong>g standardization <strong>of</strong> libraries and library pr<strong>of</strong>essionals shall be<br />

reviewed keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view latest developments <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> medical,<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>formation technology and other fields <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

and higher education to support academic work and research<br />

1. Two-fold strategy for R&D promotion at universities shall be<br />

pursued.<br />

2. Rank<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>of</strong> the universities shall be made more broad-based<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g parameters that directly po<strong>in</strong>t to the quality <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3. For promot<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>in</strong> its teach<strong>in</strong>g function, universities shall<br />

collaborate to be selective <strong>in</strong> specializ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> particular areas rather<br />

than each university attempt<strong>in</strong>g to cover the whole range <strong>of</strong><br />

programmes.<br />

4. Basic research <strong>in</strong> the universities and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions shall focus<br />

on build<strong>in</strong>g the capacity to conduct and absorb cutt<strong>in</strong>g edge research.<br />

5. Competitive research grants for fund<strong>in</strong>g must be available to ensure<br />

that the best ideas <strong>in</strong> area <strong>of</strong> importance are recognized, and allowed<br />

to develop.<br />

6. Tenure Track system <strong>of</strong> appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> faculty members will be<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutionalized.<br />

7. Faculty development doctoral and post-doctoral scholarships be


Equity<br />

Governance<br />

Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

Equal Opportunities<br />

for Students <strong>in</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Colleges<br />

<strong>Education</strong>al<br />

Institutions<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

awarded to meritorious students for pursu<strong>in</strong>g their studies both <strong>in</strong><br />

Pakistan and abroad.<br />

8. A cont<strong>in</strong>uous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development (CPD) programme shall be<br />

designed for College and university teachers<br />

9. Universities to develop quality assurance programmes and <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

peer evaluation <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g foreign expertise.<br />

10. Lecturers selected through <strong>Punjab</strong> Public Service Commission shall<br />

be required to get at least six month pre-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g/ diploma <strong>in</strong><br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g methodologies, communication skills, research and<br />

assessment techniques, so as to equip them with necessary teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

skills to undertake the job.<br />

11. Universities shall be encouraged to develop split-degree programmes<br />

<strong>in</strong> collaboration with foreign universities <strong>of</strong> good repute.<br />

1. Universities and Degree Colleges shall <strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>in</strong>tegrated fouryear<br />

Bachelor degree programmes.<br />

2. Campuses <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g universities shall be established <strong>in</strong> second and<br />

third tier cities to facilitate the spread <strong>of</strong> higher education.<br />

3. Recogniz<strong>in</strong>g the importance <strong>of</strong> social sciences <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g better<br />

social understand<strong>in</strong>g, transmission <strong>of</strong> civic and cultural values and<br />

the potential to reduce conflict, universities shall pay greater<br />

attention to this area <strong>in</strong> their research function.<br />

4. Research l<strong>in</strong>ked to local <strong>in</strong>dustry, commerce, agriculture etc. shall<br />

be encouraged to support these areas through <strong>in</strong>digenous solutions<br />

and create l<strong>in</strong>kages between academia and the market.<br />

1. To ensure adherence to m<strong>in</strong>imum standards <strong>of</strong> quality by all<br />

universities/ degree award<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions, the HEC shall develop a<br />

process for periodic re-assessment <strong>of</strong> various programmes <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

by <strong>in</strong>stitutions with regard to renewal <strong>of</strong> their degree award<strong>in</strong>g<br />

status. This provision shall be applicable to both public and private<br />

sector universities.<br />

2. Board <strong>of</strong> Governors for Degree Colleges<br />

3. Syndicates system for Universities and Centers <strong>of</strong> excellence<br />

4. Uniformity <strong>of</strong> standards<br />

5. Collaboration and coord<strong>in</strong>ation among Higher <strong>Education</strong><br />

Department Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> and Higher <strong>Education</strong><br />

Commission<br />

6. Mechanism <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements to share best<br />

practices <strong>in</strong> governance among Higher <strong>Education</strong>al Institutions<br />

1. Investment <strong>in</strong> higher education shall be <strong>in</strong>creased to 20% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

education budget along with an enhancement <strong>of</strong> the total education<br />

budget to 7% <strong>of</strong> GDP.<br />

2. Steps to be taken to raise enrolment <strong>in</strong> higher education sector from<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g 4.7% to10% by 2015and 15% by 2020.<br />

157


Table 106: Literacy and Non-Formal <strong>Education</strong><br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Literacy and Non-Formal Basic <strong>Education</strong><br />

Access Eradicate the 1. Open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Non Formal Schools and Adult Literacy Centers to<br />

menace <strong>of</strong> illiteracy accommodate out-<strong>of</strong>-school children and literacy for adult illiterate<br />

and achieve males and females<br />

MDG/EFA Goals 2. Concentrate on illiteracy pockets <strong>in</strong> remote rural areas and urban slums<br />

3. Ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> graduates <strong>of</strong> Non Formal Schools <strong>in</strong> to Formal<br />

School System<br />

4. Functional literacy with life-long and life-wide vocational skills for<br />

adults.<br />

5. Susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> adult literacy and NFBE programmes to be<br />

ensured by strengthen<strong>in</strong>g organizational structure, coord<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />

collaboration, synergy and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g budgetary allocations<br />

6. Literacy rate to be <strong>in</strong>creased up to 86% by 2015 through up-scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

ongo<strong>in</strong>g programmes <strong>of</strong> adult literacy and non-formal basic education.<br />

7. Develop a system to ma<strong>in</strong>stream the students <strong>in</strong> non-formal<br />

programmes <strong>in</strong>to regular education system and a system <strong>of</strong><br />

equivalence shall be developed to permit such ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

8. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must make arrangements to use formal<br />

school build<strong>in</strong>gs for adult literacy after school hours.<br />

9. International Development Partners especially UN agencies,<br />

community and private sector <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> awareness and advocacy<br />

programmes needs to be mobilized<br />

Quality Quality <strong>Education</strong> to<br />

ensure<br />

1. Development <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum quality <strong>of</strong> standards, certification and<br />

accreditation <strong>of</strong> Non Formal <strong>Education</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 2. Post literacy programmes to avoid relaps<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> learners <strong>in</strong> to illiteracy.<br />

3. Develop and enforce m<strong>in</strong>imum quality standards for<br />

young students and<br />

organizations <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> literacy <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> literacy<br />

vocational skills for<br />

certification and accreditation regime.<br />

adults<br />

4. Government must develop a national literacy curriculum and<br />

identify the <strong>in</strong>structional material, teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g modules and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development programmes to support the curriculum.<br />

Curriculum must be objective driven to facilitate assimilation <strong>of</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ees <strong>in</strong>to ma<strong>in</strong>stream economic activities.<br />

5. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must take steps to ensure that teachers for<br />

adult learners and non-formal education are properly tra<strong>in</strong>ed and have<br />

a well-def<strong>in</strong>ed career structure allow<strong>in</strong>g them to move <strong>in</strong>to ma<strong>in</strong>stream<br />

Equity<br />

Governance<br />

158<br />

Opportunities for all<br />

those previously<br />

neglected and<br />

unreached<br />

Non-Formal System<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> and<br />

Community<br />

participation<br />

education.<br />

1. Implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Article 25-A <strong>of</strong> the Constitution<br />

2. Gender ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3. L<strong>in</strong>kages <strong>of</strong> non-formal education with <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>in</strong>ternship<br />

programmes shall be developed to enhance economic benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

participation.<br />

4. Special literacy skills programmes shall target older child laborers,<br />

boys and girls. Special educational stipends shall be <strong>in</strong>troduced to<br />

rehabilitate child laborers Literacy and NFBED has already started the<br />

brick kiln project and there is a need to scale-up the <strong>in</strong>itiative at<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial level.<br />

1. Impeccable system <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation to ensure good<br />

governance.<br />

2. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must develop guidel<strong>in</strong>es for postprogramme<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives.


Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must allocate a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> 3% <strong>of</strong> education<br />

budget for literacy and non-formal basic education (NFBE)<br />

Table 107: Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Special <strong>Education</strong><br />

Access Special care and 1. Special <strong>Education</strong> Department <strong>in</strong>tends to achieve the aforementioned<br />

access for objective through the follow<strong>in</strong>g strategic <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />

disabled<br />

population<br />

2. Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g, expansion and up-gradation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g educational<br />

facilities.<br />

3. Technical and f<strong>in</strong>ancial support <strong>of</strong> civil society organizations provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

education to special children.<br />

4. Promotion <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusive education system to provide educational<br />

facilities to the special students at their doorsteps and to ensure<br />

maximum coverage.<br />

5. Allied services, like provision <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation services, sports facilities,<br />

Special<br />

Interventions<br />

159<br />

Adequate<br />

arrangements for<br />

outreach<br />

Quality Ensure Quality<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

Governance<br />

Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

<strong>Education</strong>al<br />

Institutions,<br />

Communities<br />

and Parents<br />

Government<br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, IT education etc.<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong> has identified the need <strong>of</strong><br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> database centers regard<strong>in</strong>g prevalence <strong>of</strong> disability and<br />

problems confront<strong>in</strong>g with Persons with Disabilities.<br />

2. Ensur<strong>in</strong>g maximum coverage <strong>of</strong> special students for provid<strong>in</strong>g them<br />

educational facilities.<br />

3. Preparation <strong>of</strong> policy on education for children with disabilities.<br />

4. Sports for special students, free uniform, free text & braille books, free<br />

pick & drop facility, merit scholarship, free board<strong>in</strong>g & lodg<strong>in</strong>g facility,<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally accepted best practices, establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

Technical & Vocational Institutions <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong>, establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> Computer Labs with Assistive Technology and data base center for<br />

the disabled<br />

1. Development <strong>of</strong> curriculum <strong>in</strong> accordance with the needs <strong>of</strong> special<br />

students.<br />

2. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> teachers and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals work<strong>in</strong>g for special students.<br />

3. Services for assessment <strong>of</strong> disability.<br />

4. I.T. education for students with disabilities.<br />

5. Vocational Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Technical <strong>Education</strong> for special students.<br />

1. Impeccable system <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g, evaluation and governance <strong>in</strong> special<br />

education department.<br />

2. Establishment <strong>of</strong> research Centre.<br />

3. Public awareness for disability related issues.<br />

4. Coord<strong>in</strong>ation with relevant stakeholders for education, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and<br />

rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> special students.<br />

5. Availability <strong>of</strong> rehabilitative services for special students.<br />

6. Creation <strong>of</strong> disability friendly environment for special students.<br />

7. Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Public Private Partnership for education <strong>of</strong> children<br />

with disabilities.<br />

8. Enhancement <strong>of</strong> enrolment through provision <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs with special<br />

facilities to special education centers, Cochlear Implant Devices to<br />

Hear<strong>in</strong>g Impaired Students, up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Institutions / Centers <strong>of</strong><br />

Special <strong>Education</strong> and stipend<br />

To cope with the demand, the department has planned to provide a separate<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> its own to Govt. Degree College <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>Education</strong>, Lahore.<br />

The estimated cost <strong>of</strong> the project is Rs 300.000 million, out <strong>of</strong> which Rs<br />

166.000 million have been allocated dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 2010-2011. There is an<br />

<strong>in</strong>cessant demand to open more schools for special children <strong>in</strong> big localities<br />

down below the tehsil level keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the large population <strong>of</strong> disable


160<br />

children.<br />

Table 108: Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Technical and Vocational <strong>Education</strong><br />

Access 1. Matriculates and 1. To reduce gap between supply and demand by open<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

Intermediate Pass Technical Institutes <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce by TEVTA and PVTC<br />

male and females 2. <strong>Policy</strong> provision for traditional apprenticeship experience <strong>in</strong> the nonformal<br />

sector could be assessed and certified for entry <strong>in</strong>to the formal<br />

2. Literate adults sector <strong>of</strong> vocational education.<br />

3. Current TVE certificate stream is too narrow <strong>in</strong> its scope and does<br />

3. Functional<br />

not cover the large variety <strong>of</strong> skill stra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that takes place <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Literacy with a traditional sector. Two way cross-over between the academic and the<br />

Vocational Skill applied/ pr<strong>of</strong>essional streams is lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the system. Government <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> must formulate a strategy to <strong>in</strong>troduce a formal TVE stream<br />

parallel to formal school system, provid<strong>in</strong>g freedom <strong>of</strong> choice to<br />

students to choose TVE <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> general education.<br />

4. Absence <strong>of</strong> a well-articulated qualifications system is a major<br />

structural short com<strong>in</strong>g. The problem <strong>of</strong> a fragmented structure <strong>of</strong><br />

governance, endemic to the education sector, also plagues the<br />

technical and vocational sub-sector. Many <strong>in</strong>stitutions and<br />

jurisdictions are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> this field without a clear<br />

demarcation <strong>of</strong> their respective responsibilities. There is no focal<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t for coherent plann<strong>in</strong>g for the sector. At the same time, the<br />

voices <strong>of</strong> important stakeholders such as the bus<strong>in</strong>ess sector are not<br />

adequately taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g the content, structures and<br />

certification <strong>of</strong> study programmes. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must<br />

recognized TVE as a separate sector with a dedicated department. At<br />

the moment TEVTA and PVTC are function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> silos. A<br />

comprehensive TVE strategy <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g all stakeholders will be<br />

beneficial to <strong>in</strong>troduce technical education and bridge the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

gap between supply and demand.<br />

5. TVE sector does not benefit from good collaboration and <strong>in</strong>put from<br />

the bus<strong>in</strong>ess sector, such as for updat<strong>in</strong>g its equipment and teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

materials. Resultantly, there are perennial compla<strong>in</strong>ts from<br />

employers about the substandard quality <strong>of</strong> the skills available <strong>in</strong> the<br />

market. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must formulate policy recogniz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the high importance <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g a broad-based and high quality<br />

sector for provid<strong>in</strong>g technical skills. Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, services and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial sector should be on board so that market based and demand<br />

<strong>Policy</strong><br />

Initiatives<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong>: TEVTA,<br />

PVTC and Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Technical <strong>Education</strong><br />

driven vocational skills should be taught by TVE sector.<br />

1. TVE curriculum should be developed <strong>in</strong> standardized modules for<br />

each trade to elim<strong>in</strong>ate differentials across various tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions to provide opportunities to the tra<strong>in</strong>ees for<br />

horizontal/upward mobility and also help <strong>in</strong> assessment and<br />

certification <strong>of</strong> apprentices <strong>in</strong> non-formal sectors for their entry <strong>in</strong>to<br />

formal vocational/technical sectors.<br />

2. TVE should be extended accord<strong>in</strong>g to the need <strong>of</strong> the area i.e. Tehsil,<br />

District and Division.<br />

3. Skills based vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g courses, relevant to local labor<br />

market, should be <strong>of</strong>fered to the graduates <strong>of</strong> literacy programmes by<br />

the National <strong>Education</strong> Foundation, prov<strong>in</strong>cial/area literacy<br />

department/directorate and relevant NGOs.<br />

4. Level-wise prerequisites for entry as a teacher <strong>in</strong> TVE should be


Special<br />

Interventions<br />

TEVTA, PVTC and<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Technical<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

Quality Certification and<br />

accreditation<br />

Governance Secure Service<br />

Delivery with<br />

Quality Outcomes<br />

Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong><br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed and Teacher pr<strong>of</strong>essional development shall be focused as an<br />

ongo<strong>in</strong>g process.<br />

5. Terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> service for TVE teachers should be<br />

compatible with market demand <strong>of</strong> their services and skills.<br />

6. Local conditions and requirements must be considered while mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

any recommendation for replication <strong>of</strong> TVE model, implemented <strong>in</strong><br />

other countries.<br />

The outreach at the moment <strong>in</strong> TVE is limited and private sector has not<br />

come up <strong>in</strong> technical education sector when compared to formal<br />

education and pr<strong>of</strong>essional education <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Government <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> must evolve a strategy to ensure establishment <strong>of</strong> TVE<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions throughout the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and also encourage and facilitate<br />

private sector for open<strong>in</strong>g TVE <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

At the moment certification and accreditation is be<strong>in</strong>g done by TEVTA<br />

and Board <strong>of</strong> Technical <strong>Education</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must<br />

developed technical standards <strong>in</strong> commensuration with the <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

standards. TEVTA has already taken this <strong>in</strong>itiative and needs policy level<br />

decision to implement the standards developed across the prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

TVE sector needs service delivery with quality outcomes and there is a<br />

dire need for governance <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutional structures. Government <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong> has already <strong>in</strong>troduced good governance practices and there is<br />

a need to guard the cont<strong>in</strong>uity and consistent improvement <strong>in</strong> governance<br />

practices.<br />

After the 18th Amendment the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Pakistan, <strong>Education</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Technical <strong>Education</strong>, is now a prov<strong>in</strong>cial subject. Pakistan is<br />

suffer<strong>in</strong>g from both skills shortage and skills gap. The total number <strong>of</strong><br />

persons enrolled <strong>in</strong> Technical and Vocation Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Institutes is only<br />

1.3% <strong>of</strong> about 300000/- people <strong>in</strong> the age cohort <strong>of</strong> 14-19. The<br />

percentage is dangerously low when compared with numbers <strong>of</strong> 35-60%<br />

for OECD Countries and 6-20% for the Asia Pacific Economies.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must enhance budgetary allocation for<br />

technical education <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Initially 3% <strong>of</strong> the ADP should be<br />

earmarked and gradually enhanced to 6% over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years.<br />

161


Table 109: Deeni Madaris<br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

Deeni Madaris<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g Students <strong>in</strong> Deeni<br />

Madaris<br />

1. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must <strong>in</strong>troduce formal subjects<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g market-oriented and skills-based subjects that would<br />

enable the children study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Deeni Madaris to have more<br />

employment options.<br />

2. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must evolve a policy and make<br />

arrangements for ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g Deeni Madaris <strong>in</strong> to formal<br />

school system gradually by tak<strong>in</strong>g all the stakeholders on board.<br />

3. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must ensure that textual and other<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g materials do not conta<strong>in</strong> anyth<strong>in</strong>g repugnant to Islamic<br />

<strong>in</strong>junctions and controversial material aga<strong>in</strong>st any sect or<br />

religious/ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities.<br />

4. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must formulate policy for teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

the subject <strong>of</strong> Ethics/Moral <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> lieu <strong>of</strong> Islamiyat to<br />

non-Muslim children and subject specific teachers shall be<br />

appo<strong>in</strong>ted accord<strong>in</strong>g to the requirements.<br />

<strong>Policy</strong> Initiatives Government <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

1. Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> should <strong>in</strong>troduce formal subjects<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g market-oriented and skills-based subjects that would<br />

enable the children graduat<strong>in</strong>g from Deeni Madaris to have more<br />

employment options.<br />

2. Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> shall make arrangements for pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

rare books on Islam, charts and materials relat<strong>in</strong>g to Islamic<br />

<strong>in</strong>junctions and their distribution amongst libraries <strong>of</strong> schools,<br />

colleges, universities, research <strong>in</strong>stitutions and Deeni Madaris.<br />

3. Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> shall ensure that textual and other learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

materials do not conta<strong>in</strong> anyth<strong>in</strong>g repugnant to Islamic <strong>in</strong>junctions<br />

and controversial material aga<strong>in</strong>st any sect.<br />

4. Matter <strong>of</strong> Deeni Madrasah is volatile and needs to be handled<br />

carefully keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the experiences <strong>of</strong> abrupt policy<br />

<strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> the past.<br />

5. Madrasah reform programme can only be successful once all the<br />

stakeholders have ownership <strong>of</strong> the reform agenda and dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> implementation, everybody is on board. The gradual and<br />

consistent reform process will deliver dividends<br />

Budgetary<br />

Allocations<br />

Government<br />

the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Number Deeni Madaris is on the rise especially <strong>in</strong> Southern <strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must allocate adequate budget and start the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g formal subjects.<br />

162


Table 110: <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Emergencies<br />

Needs Target Group Strategies<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Emergencies<br />

Meet<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Emergencies<br />

Students<br />

Emergency<br />

Situation<br />

<strong>in</strong><br />

1. <strong>Education</strong> <strong>of</strong> the students <strong>in</strong> flood affective areas has been<br />

impacted. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> needs to evolve a strategy to<br />

arrange make-shift arrangements for schools and colleges s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

schools build<strong>in</strong>gs have been destroyed.<br />

2. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must evolve a policy to help the<br />

parents facilitat<strong>in</strong>g the education <strong>of</strong> their children <strong>in</strong> emergencies.<br />

3. Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong> must ensure that educational<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions rema<strong>in</strong> open and access is ensured through temporary<br />

arrangements <strong>in</strong> tents.<br />

Health<br />

Hygiene<br />

and<br />

Health Facility to<br />

Students<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> must ensure that students <strong>in</strong> flood affected<br />

areas and other emergencies have health cover and immunization<br />

facilities. Moreover adequate arrangements are made to cope with<br />

epidemic s<strong>in</strong>ce children are the worst affected.<br />

Incentives for<br />

Teachers <strong>in</strong><br />

Emergencies<br />

Special<br />

Institutional<br />

Arrangements<br />

Emergencies<br />

and Curriculum<br />

Teachers<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

Departments<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

Departments<br />

Teachers hold key positions for keep<strong>in</strong>g the schools operational dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

emergencies. There is a need to evolve a policy to give <strong>in</strong>centives to the<br />

teachers teach<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g emergencies and keep the schools and<br />

educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions operational.<br />

Emergencies are extraord<strong>in</strong>ary situations and special <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

arrangements are required. There is a dire need to evolve a policy for<br />

special <strong>in</strong>stitution arrangements at departmental level to develop<br />

Stand<strong>in</strong>g Operat<strong>in</strong>g Procedure (SOPs) to deal with emergencies.<br />

Emergencies should f<strong>in</strong>d a place as stories and awareness material <strong>in</strong> the<br />

syllabus <strong>of</strong> schools and colleges so that students are aware and sensitized<br />

to deal with difficult situations dur<strong>in</strong>g emergencies. Moreover it should<br />

be part <strong>of</strong> the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the teachers so that they can mentor their<br />

mentees to deal with emergencies.<br />

163


References<br />

• All Pakistan Private School Association June Bullet<strong>in</strong> 2011<br />

• Asian Development Bank (2010), Public Private Partnerships - Lessons Learned from <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> Foundation http://www.adb.org/documents/reports/ppp-education-punjab/pppeducation-punjab.pdf<br />

• Constitution <strong>of</strong> Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Pakistan 1973 25-A: Right to education: “The State shall<br />

provide free and compulsory education to all children <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> five to sixteen years <strong>in</strong><br />

such manner as may be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by law”<br />

• Country Report: Pakistan Economist Intelligence Unit, The Economist, November 2007.<br />

• ECE <strong>Policy</strong> Review: Policies, Pr<strong>of</strong>ile and Programs <strong>of</strong> Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong> (ECE) <strong>in</strong><br />

Pakistan; <strong>UNESCO</strong> and UNICEF, January 2008<br />

• Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister’s Secretariat: <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap Reform<br />

Programme 2008-11<br />

• Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, School <strong>Education</strong> Department 2011: 18th Constitutional<br />

Amendment-Challenges & Opportunities for <strong>Education</strong> Sector<br />

• Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>: Rules <strong>of</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess 1973<br />

• Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>: Vision 2030, Plann<strong>in</strong>g & Development Department 2011<br />

• Kardar Shahid (2006). Reflections on Pakistan’s Economy Heritage Publications Lahore,<br />

Pakistan<br />

• Khan, S.H. (2007) F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g Higher <strong>Education</strong>: A view from the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission.<br />

Conference on Higher <strong>Education</strong>, GCU, Lahore<br />

• Khan, S.H. (2007) F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g Higher <strong>Education</strong>: A view from the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission.<br />

Conference on Higher <strong>Education</strong>, GCU, Lahore<br />

• Khan, S.H. (2007) F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g Higher <strong>Education</strong>: A view from the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission.<br />

Conference on Higher <strong>Education</strong>, GCU, Lahore<br />

• Malik, A.B (2007) Freedom <strong>of</strong> Choice: Affordable Quality <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Public Private<br />

Partnership<br />

• Malik, A.B (2006a). Econometric <strong>Analysis</strong> and Evaluative Scrut<strong>in</strong>y <strong>of</strong> the Quality Assurance<br />

Tests <strong>in</strong> Foundation Assisted Schools <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>. The Hope, Quarterly Journal<br />

(Volume-I) <strong>of</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation, Lahore, Pakistan<br />

• Malik, A.B (2006b). <strong>Education</strong> Voucher Scheme-The Hope, Quarterly Journal (Volume-II) <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation, Lahore, Pakistan<br />

• Malik, A.B (2006c)-The Human Development Nexus-Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development and Capacity<br />

Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Public Private Partnership, Maqbool Academy, Lahore. Pakistan<br />

• Malik, A.B (2004):The Foundations <strong>of</strong> Success: The Impact <strong>of</strong> Early Childhood <strong>Education</strong><br />

and Development on the Personality <strong>of</strong> the Child<br />

• Malik, A.B (2007):Freedom <strong>of</strong> Choice, Affordable Quality <strong>Education</strong> <strong>in</strong> Public Private<br />

Partnership<br />

• Malik, A.B (2010): Asian Development Bank, Public Private Partnerships <strong>in</strong> <strong>Education</strong>:<br />

Lessons Learned from the <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation. http://www.adb.org/documents/<br />

reports/ppp-education-punjab/ppp-education-punjab.pdf<br />

• Medium Term Development Framework 2010-13 and Annual Development Programme 2010-<br />

11, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

• Message by Ms. Ir<strong>in</strong>a Bokova, Director General <strong>of</strong> <strong>UNESCO</strong> on the occasion <strong>of</strong> International<br />

Literacy Day 8 Sep 2011, Section for Literacy and Non Formal <strong>Education</strong> Division for Basic<br />

to Higher <strong>Education</strong> and Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>UNESCO</strong>. www.unesco.org/education/literacy<br />

164


• M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, Government <strong>of</strong> Pakistan. 2003. Directory <strong>of</strong> Deeni Madaris <strong>in</strong> Pakistan<br />

2003. Curriculum w<strong>in</strong>g (Islamic <strong>Education</strong> Center) M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>.<br />

• Mohammad Saeed; <strong>Education</strong> System <strong>of</strong> Pakistan and the UK: Comparisons <strong>in</strong> Context to<br />

Inter-prov<strong>in</strong>cial and Inter-countries Reflections; <strong>in</strong> Bullet<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> & Research<br />

December 2007, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 43-57<br />

• Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) <strong>Punjab</strong> 2007-08, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong><br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g & Development Department, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Lahore http://www.<br />

pndpunjab.gov.pk/userfiles/File/MICS%202007-08-Prov<strong>in</strong>cial%20 Report. pdf<br />

• <strong>Punjab</strong> Development Statistics 2011, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Lahore<br />

http://www.pndpunjab.gov.pk/page.aspid=65<br />

• <strong>Punjab</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Foundation 2009-10: <strong>Education</strong> Voucher Scheme <strong>in</strong> Urban Slums <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Punjab</strong>.<br />

• <strong>Punjab</strong> School Roadmap, Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Punjab</strong>, Chief M<strong>in</strong>ister Secretariat, Lahore 2010<br />

• Rehman, Tariq.2004. The Madrasah and the State <strong>of</strong> Pakistan: Religion, Poverty and the<br />

Potential for Violence <strong>in</strong> Pakistan).<br />

• TEVTA Annual Report 2010-2011<br />

• The Pakistan <strong>Education</strong> Task Force (2010) <strong>Education</strong> Emergency Pakistan: March For<br />

<strong>Education</strong>. www. education emergency. com.pk<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!