山區道路邊坡崩塌防治工法最佳化研究（一） - 國家災害防救科技中心

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PUBLICATION ABSTRACTS OF RESEARCH PROJECTS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ADVISORS OFFICE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TITLEThe Optimization of Mitigation for Roadway Slope Failure() GOVERNMENT ISBN(OR ISSN) PUBLICATIONS PROJECT NUMBER NUMBER 1009205237 MOTC-STAO-92-12 DIRECTOR GENERALJia,Yu-Hui HONE02-23492860 FAX02-23122476 E-MAILyh_jea@motc.gov.tw SPONSOR STAFFHseu,Shu-Wang PHONE02-23492861 FAX02-23122476 E-MAILsy_hsu@motc.gov.tw PROJECT From: Mar. 31, 2003 PERIOD To: Dec. 15, 2003 RESEARCH AGENCYTaiwan Construction Research Institute PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORDr. Lee, Wei Feng PHONE02-89195050 FAX02-86659747 E-MAILweilee@tcri.org.tw PROJECT STAFFLiao, Lin, and Yen ADDRESS11F, 190, Sec. 2, Chung_Hsing Road, Hsintien, Taipei, Taiwan 231, R.O.C. PHONE02-89195050 PROJECT NT $ 1,600,000 BUDGET KEY WORDSperformance of slope, mechanism of landslide, optimization ABSTRACT Over the years, great efforts have been invested into the mitigation procedure for the roadway slope hazards. This action accumulates a sufficient knowledge for repairing slope failure in Taiwan. In order to provide an up-to-date tool, the optimization procedure has been introduced for the mitigation process. The Science and Technology Advisors Office in Ministry of Transportation and Communications helps Taiwan Construction Research Institute developing this optimization procedure for the risk evaluation of roadway slope safety in mountain area. This project involves the following six major steps: 1.Classifying the slope failure type with specific mitigation technique, 2.Developing risk analysis procedure, 3.Developing model for mitigation technique with the functional and economical aspects, 4.Developing guidelines for optimized construction method for roadway slope design, 5.Applying the optimization process to an example roadway slope, and 6.Developing the manual for the optimization process of the roadway slope design. The achievements of this project can be the following: 1.This optimization procedure benefits engineers to design project with good quality control, economy, and conserving public resource. 2.The optimization procedure helps the risk evaluation on design. 3.The outcome of this project helps slope management by decreasing the risk level. 4.The objective evaluation procedure helps spending construction budge in a economical process. 5.This optimization procedure provides a sustainable design with considering the biological, environmental, and cultural aspects. 6.The overall developing of this process aims to a high quality training for roadway slope design personal. DATE OF PUBLICATION NUMBER OF PAGES PRICE CLASSIFICATION SECRET December 2003 300 NT $ 500 CONFIDENTIAL UNCLASSIFIED The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the Ministry of Transportation and Communications. II
........................................................................................................... ABSTRACT .............................................................................................. ...........................................................................................................III .......................................................................................................VI ..................................................................................................... VII ................................................................................................XIV ............................................................................................... 1 ....................................................................................... 7 ............................................................. 11 3.1 ............................................21 3.2 ............................................................47 .........................................75 4.1 .............................................................................77 4.1.1 ..............................................................78 4.1.2 ......................................................82 4.2 .............................................................................84 .................................................................91 5.1 ........................................................................91 III
Page 1 and 2: MOTC-STAO-92-12
Page 3 and 4: MOTC-STAO-92-12
Page 5: 1009205237 MOTC-STAO-92-12 02-23
Page 9 and 10: 8.2.3 ............................
Page 11 and 12: 1.1 21 ...........................
Page 13 and 14: 3.37 .............................
Page 15 and 16: 4.5 ..............................
Page 17 and 18: 8.23 .............................
Page 19 and 20: 247 1. 2. TRB GEO
Page 21 and 22: 1.1 1
Page 23 and 24: 3 TRB 1996
Page 25 and 26: 5
Page 27 and 28: 1. 2. TRBSpecial Report2471
Page 29 and 30: Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP Disc
Page 31 and 32: 11 88
Page 33 and 34: _______________ _______________
Page 35 and 36: 3.1(3) mm 1 mm mm 2
Page 37 and 38: 3.1(4) [1][2] [2] [2] [3]
Page 39 and 40: 3.1(6) GPS N E M
Page 41 and 42: 3.1 TRBSpecial Report2471996 3.
Page 43 and 44: 5. Flow 6. Creep
Page 45 and 46: 3.3 R FA TO SL SP FL 10
Page 47 and 48: 2. Debris Fall R-FA-20 20 80 2 3
Page 49 and 50: 4. Black Toppling R-TO-20 3.7 3.8
Page 51 and 52: 6. Debris Toppling R-TO-40 3.1
Page 53 and 54: 8. Plane Slide R-SL-20 3.15 3.
Page 55 and 56: 10. Debris Slide R-SL-40 3.19 3.2
Page 57 and 58:
12. Block Spread R-SP-10 3.23
Page 59 and 60:
15. Debris Flow R-FL-20 2 2 5
Page 61 and 62:
17. Soil Topple S-TO-10 3.31 3.32
Page 63 and 64:
(a) (b) (c) 3.34 3.35 43
Page 65 and 66:
20. Soil Spread S-SP-10 1999 921
Page 67 and 68:
3.2 TRB Special Report 247
Page 69 and 70:
3.4 010 011 012 013 014
Page 71 and 72:
3.49 3.50 (7) E-070 3.51 (8)
Page 73 and 74:
3.44 18 3.45 53
Page 75 and 76:
3.47 9 3.48 55
Page 77 and 78:
3.51 3 3.52 57
Page 79 and 80:
(6) I-060 3.58 (7) I-070
Page 81 and 82:
3.54 3.55 3 61
Page 83 and 84:
3.58 3. V (1) V-010 3.
Page 85 and 86:
3.59 2K+370 3.60 65
Page 87 and 88:
3.63 (a) (b) 3.64 67
Page 89 and 90:
A. D-021 56 B. D-022 1215
Page 91 and 92:
3.67 3.68 18 71
Page 93 and 94:
5. A (1) A-010 line post 10
Page 95 and 96:
qualitative quatitative 1 / yea
Page 97 and 98:
4.1 Geographic Information
Page 99 and 100:
4.2 4.3 4.1 4.2 79
Page 101 and 102:
4.1 . 20 40 60 80 100 0
Page 103 and 104:
4.4 25 -45 Gr3Gc3Gp1 1,350 0.0
Page 105 and 106:
e 0.20 0.20 0 0 0.80 0.80 0
Page 107 and 108:
4.5 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-
Page 109 and 110:
2000 1 1 1 0.5 d c 2000
Page 111 and 112:
5.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 La
Page 113 and 114:
5.2 5.3 93
Page 115 and 116:
5.2.1 Colorado CRSP 100 1.7
Page 117 and 118:
1 5.7 5.7 97
Page 119 and 120:
5.9 5.10 5.4 Geosynthetics
Page 121 and 122:
5.4.4 Filtration Separation 5
Page 123 and 124:
6.1 1. precipitation runoff
Page 125 and 126:
(1) Mass Properties Porosity
Page 127 and 128:
3. Cut Slopes Fill Slopes Eart
Page 129 and 130:
50 500 10 4.6 GEO 4.
Page 131 and 132:
CLSM Control Low Strength Material
Page 133 and 134:
113
Page 135 and 136:
7.1 9 18 3 115
Page 137 and 138:
Nominal Scale Pairwise Comparisons
Page 139 and 140:
SPSS 7.2 119
Page 141 and 142:
18 3.1 1. 2. 3.
Page 143 and 144:
8.1 8.2 8.1 8.15 22k+80032k+100 2
Page 145 and 146:
8.1 18 24k+800 8.2 18 25k+600 1
Page 147 and 148:
8.5 18 28k+200 8.6 18 57k+300 1
Page 149 and 150:
8.9 18 65k+000 8.10 18 65k+500
Page 151 and 152:
8.13 18 69k+000 8.14 18 70k+000
Page 153 and 154:
8.16 18 8.17 133
Page 155 and 156:
8.18 2. 8.19 GPS 8.20 ArcGIS 1
Page 157 and 158:
8.21 4. 8.22 137
Page 159 and 160:
8.23 8.2.3 8.24 8.24 139
Page 161 and 162:
8.25 8.26 8.3.2 141
Page 163 and 164:
8.28 18 69k+40070k+000 81k+400~46
Page 165 and 166:
TRBSpecial Report 247 TRBSpecial R
Page 167 and 168:
147 9.1 18
Page 169 and 170:
10.1 92 1. 2. 3.
Page 171 and 172:
10.2 1. 2. GIS 3. 9 18
Page 173 and 174:
1. Abramson, L.W., Lee, T.S., Sharm
Page 175 and 176:
22. 1998 23. 2000 921 24. 2002
Page 177 and 178:
157
Page 179 and 180:
3 159
Page 181 and 182:
(3) 1. 2. 3. 4. 161
Page 183 and 184:
163
Page 185 and 186:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1
Page 187 and 188:
4. 1. 2. 79 4.1 Pf 82 4.3 3.
Page 189 and 190:
18 18 16
Page 191 and 192:
1999 2.1 2.2 171
Page 193 and 194:
2.2 1999 173
Page 195 and 196:
2.1.3 2.2 2.2.1
Page 197 and 198:
2.2.3 1. (1) (2) (3) (7) ( ) (8
Page 199 and 200:
2. 3. 4. 5. 2.3.3
Page 201 and 202:
181 2.1 2003 10%
Page 203 and 204:
183 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 2.4
Page 205 and 206:
2.5.1 SPT 63.5 76 45 1545 N
Page 207 and 208:
2. 187
Page 209 and 210:
incorporated water balance equatio
Page 211 and 212:
4.1.3 Infiltration ( ) (1) (2)
Page 213 and 214:
Fault shatter-zones heavily-joint
Page 215 and 216:
piezometer tensiometers
Page 217 and 218:
porosity groundwater modeling
Page 219 and 220:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 4.3.3 Wetting Band
Page 221 and 222:
saturation trial pits disturba
Page 223 and 224:
pumping dewatering 1. reservoirs
Page 225 and 226:
Coates,1970Hoek & Bray,1981 fi
Page 227 and 228:
siltation 4.4.2 adits rei
Page 229 and 230:
4.5.1 Granular Filters graded fil
Page 231 and 232:
United States Bureau of Reclamation
Page 233 and 234:
6.1 6.1.1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. unit h
Page 235 and 236:
6.1.3 Bransby-Williams L t =
Page 237 and 238:
ock trap rock traps handing-ov
Page 239 and 240:
S gradient of channel energy dissi
Page 241 and 242:
6.3.2 Vegetation Succession 6.
Page 243 and 244:
6.3.5 3 8 75% 25% 30%
Page 245 and 246:
40 50 50 1.2 6.4.3
Page 247 and 248:
227 (1) (2) (3) (4) 7.
Page 249 and 250:
7.3 7.4 229
Page 251 and 252:
7.6 90 V 7.2 1. 7.7 7.9 2. 7.
Page 253 and 254:
7.9 7.10 233
Page 255 and 256:
7.13 7.14 235
Page 257 and 258:
7.16 237
Page 259 and 260:
7.19 7.4 1. 7.20 7.21 2. 7.
Page 261 and 262:
7.22 7.23 241
show all

山區道路邊坡崩塌防治工法最佳化研究（一） - 國家災害防救科技中心

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?