12.01.2015 Views

R325 - Effect of Different Rate of Azotobacter ... - Agrisciences.com

R325 - Effect of Different Rate of Azotobacter ... - Agrisciences.com

R325 - Effect of Different Rate of Azotobacter ... - Agrisciences.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter IV<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />

In this Chapter the corresponding Statistical Analysis is presented, expressed in tables, figures referred to averages,<br />

as well as the Economic Analysis corresponding to each treatment.<br />

Blocks<br />

Table 6. Yield in kilograms for harvested area (4.80 m 2 ) for the factorial 3a x 3b + control<br />

Total<br />

A 0 A 1 A 2<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

b 0 B 1 b 2 b 0 b 1 b 2 b 0 b 1 b 2 Blocks Control<br />

Total <strong>of</strong><br />

blocks<br />

+<br />

control<br />

I 10.40 12.80 8.40 11.84 22.40 11.20 12.80 9.20 12.80 101.84 9.40 111.240<br />

II 9.44 9.60 12.28 8.72 11.60 13.60 12.00 12.80 13.60 103.64 8.00 111.640<br />

III 11.60 10.00 11.60 12.00 12.00 13.20 l0.80 11.20 9.40 101.80 8.224 110.024<br />

IV 9.20 9.20 9.80 11.04 10.80 12.00 10.00 12.80 12.40 97.24 7.200 104.440<br />

AB 40.64 41.60 42.08 43.60 46.80 50.00 45.60 46.00 48.20 404.52 32.824 437.344<br />

A A 0 = 224.32 A 1 = 140.40 a 2 = A 2 = 139.80 404.52 437.344<br />

B b 0 = 129.84 b 1 = 134.40 b 2 = b 2 = 140.28 404.52 437.344<br />

Table 7. Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance (ANVA) for the treatments <strong>of</strong> the factorial 3A x 3B with 1 control<br />

F<br />

F.V. G.L. S.C. C. M. Fc 0.05 0.01<br />

Blocks 3 3.3377 1.1126 0.54 NS 2.96 4.60<br />

Treatments 9 53.2833 5.9204 2.88* 2.25 3.14<br />

Treat. Vs. Control 1 33.0658 33.0658 16.11** 4.21 7.68<br />

Factorial 3Ax3B 8 20.2176 2.5272 1.23 NS 2.30 3.26<br />

<strong>Azotobacter</strong> (A) 2 13.8488 6.9244 3.37* 3.35 5.49<br />

Fun. lineal 1 9.9846 9.9846 4.86* 4.21 7.68<br />

Fun. cuadrát. 1 3.8642 3.8642 1.88 NS 4.21 7.68<br />

Agrispon (B) 2 4.5656 2.2828 1.11 NS 3.35 5.49<br />

Fun. Lineal 1 4.5414 4.5414 0.21 NS 4.21 7.68<br />

Fun. cuadrát. 1 0.0242 0.0242 0.01 NS 4.21 7.68<br />

A x B 4 1.8032 0.4508 0.22 NS 2.73 4.11<br />

A L B L 1 0.0012 0.0012 0.001 NS 4.21 7.68<br />

A L B Q 1 0.0067 0.0067 0.003 NS 4.21 7.68<br />

A Q B L 1 0.1064 0.1064 0.05 NS 4.21 7.68<br />

A Q B Q 1 0.0123 0.0123 0.005 NS 4.21 7.68<br />

Error 27 2.0521<br />

Total 39 112.0274<br />

C. V. = 13.10 %<br />

As can be seen, the Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Variability is inside the ranges specified for investigational works in the field.<br />

In the Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance (Table 7) we find that statistical significance doesn't exist between blocks probably not<br />

to factors, specified (illegible text).<br />

For the Agrispon treatments, statistical significance doesn't exist. Nevertheless, when observing the square means<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>com</strong>ponents, it is noticed that the applications have a lineal tendency that is to say that the yields increase as<br />

the applications <strong>of</strong> the biostimulant increases. Although it is necessary to notice that these increases are in a very<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!