R325 - Effect of Different Rate of Azotobacter ... - Agrisciences.com

3.1. Fertilizers - according to the soil analysis, 80 kg/ha of 46% urea nitrogen was applied.
3.2. Other Materials - petri dishes, Erlenmeyer flasks, test tubes pipette, stove, autoclave, winch, line stakes,
pick, shovel, rake, watering-can, fungicide, scale and ruler.
4. Study: Factors
4.1. Factor A: Azotobacter with 3 levels:
a 0 00 g/ha
a 1 250 g/ha
a 2 500 g/ha
4.2. Factor B: Agrispon with 3 application frequencies
b 0 00 application
b 1 1 application
b 2 2 applications
5. Treatment in Study:
Table 5. Relationship and Code for Treatments in Study
TREATMENTS
No Code Inoculant g/ha Agrispon application
1 a 0 b 0 00 00
2 a 0 b 1 00 1
3 a 0 b 2 00 2
4 a 1 b 1 250 00
5 a 1 b 1 250 1
6 a 1 b 2 250 2
7 a 2 b 0 500 00
8 a 2 b 1 500 1
9 a 2 b 2 500 2
10 Control 00 00
6. Experimental Design.
The design “Completely Random Block” was used with factorial arrangement of 3A x 3B which 10
treatments including a control with 4 repetitions per treatment.
7. Characteristic of the Experimental Field:
7.1. Blocks:
Long 24 m
Wide 4 m
Area 96 m 2
7.2. Parcels:
Number 10
Long 4 m
Wide 2.4 m
Area 9.6 m 2
Outline of the Experimental Field:
6