R325 - Effect of Different Rate of Azotobacter ... - Agrisciences.com

Figura 7: Histogram of Profitability for the 10 Treatments in order of mer
4.8
4.6
Yield Kg/Ha
4.4
4.2
4
3.8
3.6
3.4
6 7 5 9 8 4 1 2 3 10
Treatments
In table 13, the Economic Study is presented for onion cultivation per hectare, as net value. Control (T 10 ) is less
than all other treatments: treatment 6 (a 1 b 2 ) best, followed by treatment 9 (a 2 b 2 ) and then treatment 5 (a 1 b 1 ). The
difference between treatment 6 and treatment 9 and treatment 5 was 1,895,000 intis and 3,033,320 intis respectively,
however, as for the cost-benefit relationship, the best was treatment 6 (a1b2) with 4.644 intis which also had the
highest net value, next was treatment 7 (a 2 b 0 ) with 4.49 intis but with net utility that was 5 th best, it is noticed that
Azotobacter was at a rate of 500 g/ha; the 3 rd best was treatment 5 (a 1 b 1 ) with 4.46 intis. As for the difference in
Net value between treatment in 6 th and 9 th position in relation to control are respectively 16,115.66 intis and
14,220.66 intis and with respect profitability of the treatments that 6 th and 7 th best treatments compared to control
are respectively of 1.06 intis and 0.96 intis.
With above-mentioned you can conclude that the Azotobacter spp. influences yields notably, and when considering
the economic aspect it is suitable to use because for its low costs it contributes good value.
Chapter V
CONCLUSIONS
According to the objectives and under the conditions of the study, the following conclusions were reached:
1. The best yields obtained by effect inoculation of Azotobacter were the 250 g/ha compared to the 500 g/ha rate
the yield was very similar.
2. As for frequency of Application, all the treatments are statistically the same; however, the yields are increased
as the application frequency increases.
3. The interaction of Azotobacter and Agrispon was not significant, but to compare these factors to the control
high statistical significance was obtained.
4. With the combination of Azotobacter and Agrispon (a 1 b 1 ) the highest yield was obtained, with 26,041.66 kg/ha.
5. The correlation of diameter of bulb to yield was highly significant: the correlation of length of root to yield did
not give statistical significance.
16