12.11.2012 Views

Planning Workshop –Sustainable Management of Marginal - Unesco

Planning Workshop –Sustainable Management of Marginal - Unesco

Planning Workshop –Sustainable Management of Marginal - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annex IV ‐ Comments and suggestions on Session 2: Presentation <strong>of</strong> project‐<br />

site proposals<br />

These comments were summarized by Pr<strong>of</strong> Donald Gabriels, who took the lead in providing feedback<br />

on the case study proposals.<br />

General comments<br />

The presentations <strong>of</strong> the ‘lessons learned’ from the 1 st phase <strong>of</strong> SUMAMAD were very good and also<br />

very much appreciated showing already the need for a 2 nd phase <strong>of</strong> SUMAMAD. The enthusiasm <strong>of</strong><br />

the partners is also very much appreciated but should however take into account a ‘realistic’ but<br />

limited budget. More and other financial resources should be found. Therefore it is suggested that<br />

the proposals consider clear and specific objectives, eventually complemented to each other. The<br />

socio‐economical aspects should be included in each project proposal and clearly explained.<br />

Specific comments for each case study sites<br />

Hunshandake Sand Area: (Dr Jiang Gaoming)(China)<br />

Positive points:<br />

- lessons learned: ok<br />

- objectives are clear: ‐chicken farming, milk cattle, forage market<br />

- project helped two farms to raise chicken, 5 farms in 2009 is realistic<br />

- organic wheat for chicken farming, organic food production<br />

- proposal is not too ambitious<br />

Points to be improved and to be clarified better:<br />

- why is economy weak?<br />

- Clarify what organisation would help to develop marketing strategy <strong>of</strong> organic chicken<br />

- Organic food production shall be put on market in Beijing in 2001??<br />

Heihe River Area (Dr Wang Tao) (China)<br />

Positive points:<br />

- Lessons learned<br />

Points to be improved and to be clarified better:<br />

- Specific objectives should be indicated<br />

- explain better the ‘integrated’ watershed<br />

- effect <strong>of</strong> water savings on ecology<br />

- How will the proposal contribute to alternative livelihood objective<br />

Omayed Biosphere Reserve(Boshra B. Salem) (Egypt)<br />

Positive points:<br />

- a good review <strong>of</strong> the previous phase <strong>of</strong> SUMAMAD is given<br />

- the five scenarios are good<br />

- the idea <strong>of</strong> new stakeholders: change from rangeland to agriculture, coastal habitants and<br />

urbanization<br />

- possibilities for new financial support<br />

Points to be clarified<br />

‐ problems <strong>of</strong> land tenure is important<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!