14.01.2015 Views

LES of shock wave / turbulent boundary layer interaction

LES of shock wave / turbulent boundary layer interaction

LES of shock wave / turbulent boundary layer interaction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

31<br />

Figure 3.2: Instantaneous z−vorticity component ω z in x − y section.<br />

3.2 Mean flow and statistical analysis<br />

The mean-flow characteristics for the reference section x r are summarized<br />

and compared with the experiment in table 3.1. δ 1 and δ 2 are displacement<br />

and momentum thickness, respectively. Re δ2 is the Reynolds<br />

number based on the free-stream velocity, momentum thickness and viscosity<br />

at the wall. H 12 is the shape factor. The agreement <strong>of</strong> δ 0 , δ 1 ,<br />

δ 2 , H 12 with the experiment is good. The computed skin-friction coefficient<br />

C f differs more significantly from the experiment with an uncertainty<br />

<strong>of</strong> about ±10%. However, the discrepancy is within the limits <strong>of</strong><br />

experimental-data scatter, as shown in figure 3.3. In this figure several<br />

experimental data sets C f versus Re δ2 , taken from Fernholz & Finley<br />

(1977, 1981), are shown along with our computed values and the experimental<br />

reference values at station E1. An empirical fit <strong>of</strong> the experimental<br />

data is shown by the dashed line, using a von Kármán-Schoenherr<br />

incompressible skin-friction formula<br />

C finc =<br />

1<br />

17.08(log 10 Re θinc ) 2 + 25.11log 10 Re θinc + 6.012 ,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!