14.01.2015 Views

Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in the Adult ICU

Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in the Adult ICU

Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in the Adult ICU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>Neuromuscular</strong> block<strong>in</strong>g agents (NMBAs) should be considered an <strong>in</strong>tervention of last resort due to <strong>the</strong><br />

multiple complications associated with <strong>the</strong>ir use. These agents are classified based upon <strong>the</strong>ir structure,<br />

mechanism of action, and pharmacok<strong>in</strong>etic properties. Structurally, NMBAs have ei<strong>the</strong>r an<br />

am<strong>in</strong>osteroidal or benzylisoqu<strong>in</strong>ol<strong>in</strong>ium nucleus. Mechanistically, <strong>the</strong>y are classified as ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

depolariz<strong>in</strong>g or non-depolariz<strong>in</strong>g. Depolariz<strong>in</strong>g agents b<strong>in</strong>d to and activate nicot<strong>in</strong>ic acetylchol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

receptors result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> depolarization of <strong>the</strong> postsynaptic membrane of striated muscle. Succ<strong>in</strong>ylchol<strong>in</strong>e is<br />

<strong>the</strong> only depolariz<strong>in</strong>g agent. Outside of rapid sequence <strong>in</strong>tubation (RSI), it has limited application <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>ICU</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g due to its short half-life. Non-depolariz<strong>in</strong>g agents also b<strong>in</strong>d to acetylchol<strong>in</strong>e receptors, but<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead of activat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>y act as competitive antagonists. Pharmacok<strong>in</strong>etically, NMBAs differ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

duration of action and route of elim<strong>in</strong>ation. Additionally, differences exist <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> degree of histam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

release, vagal block, risk of prolonged blockade, and cost.<br />

AMINOSTEROIDAL AGENTS<br />

BENZYLISOQUINOLINIUM<br />

AGENT<br />

NMBA<br />

Pancuronium<br />

Vecuronium<br />

Cisatracurium<br />

(Pavulon )<br />

(Norcuron )<br />

(Nimbex )<br />

Initial dose (mg/kg) 0.06-0.1 0.08-0.1 0.1-0.2<br />

Duration (m<strong>in</strong>) 90-100 35-45 45-60<br />

Infusion dose<br />

(g/kg/m<strong>in</strong>)<br />

1-2 0.8-1.2 2.5-3<br />

Recovery (m<strong>in</strong>) 120-180 45-60 90<br />

% Renal excretion 45-70 50 Hoffman elim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Renal failure Increased effect Increased effect No change<br />

% Biliary excretion 10-15 35-50 Hoffman elim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Hepatic failure Mild <strong>in</strong>creased effect<br />

Variable, mild <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

effect<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imal to no change<br />

Active metabolites Yes Yes No<br />

Histam<strong>in</strong>e release<br />

(hypotension)<br />

No No No<br />

Vagal block<br />

(tachycardia)<br />

Modest to marked No No<br />

Prolonged <strong>ICU</strong><br />

block<br />

Yes Yes Rare<br />

Relative Cost $ $$ $$$<br />

Adapted from Murray et al. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:142-56<br />

LITERATURE REVIEW<br />

The cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice guidel<strong>in</strong>es developed by <strong>the</strong> American College of Critical Care Medic<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>the</strong><br />

Society of Critical Care Medic<strong>in</strong>e provide a detailed review of issues related to <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed use of<br />

NMBAs <strong>in</strong> critically ill patients (1). The physiology of <strong>the</strong> neuromuscular receptor and pharmacology of<br />

NMBAs used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ICU</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g are reviewed. Additionally, methods of monitor<strong>in</strong>g and complications are<br />

discussed and recommendations are provided. An evidence-based review focus<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> use of NMBAs<br />

<strong>in</strong> critically ill septic patients provides recommendations specific to this population (2).<br />

Selected studies address<strong>in</strong>g monitor<strong>in</strong>g and complications are discussed below.<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

A prospective, randomized, controlled <strong>in</strong>vestigation was conducted <strong>in</strong> 77 critically ill medical patients to<br />

compare outcomes between two different monitor<strong>in</strong>g methods of neuromuscular blockade (3).<br />

Vecuronium doses were <strong>in</strong>dividualized by peripheral nerve stimulation (TOF) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatment group and<br />

by standard cl<strong>in</strong>ical assessment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> control group. Although TOF monitor<strong>in</strong>g was performed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

control group, <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g and housestaff were bl<strong>in</strong>ded to <strong>the</strong> results and made dosage adjustments<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to a protocol. The mean TOF value at drug discont<strong>in</strong>uation was significantly lower <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

standard cl<strong>in</strong>ical assessment group compared to <strong>the</strong> TOF group. There was less drug used to achieve<br />

2 Revised 10/2/07, 09/01/12<br />

Approved 11/18/03

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!