In Fear of the Barbed Wire Fence - Ukrainian Canadian Civil ...
In Fear of the Barbed Wire Fence - Ukrainian Canadian Civil ...
In Fear of the Barbed Wire Fence - Ukrainian Canadian Civil ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>In</strong> <strong>Fear</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Barbed</strong> <strong>Wire</strong> <strong>Fence</strong><br />
disfranchised most <strong>Ukrainian</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong>s. [53] There was little effective<br />
protest against this law, although Canada’s oldest daily newspaper, <strong>the</strong> Daily<br />
British Whig <strong>of</strong> Kingston, Ontario, did ruminate:<br />
It is quite probable that if this proposal becomes law <strong>the</strong> alleged<br />
‘foreigners’ and hi<strong>the</strong>rto ‘naturalized’ <strong>Canadian</strong>s will bear <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
reproach meekly, but <strong>the</strong>y will have sown in <strong>the</strong>ir hearts <strong>the</strong><br />
seeds <strong>of</strong> a bitterness that can never be extirpated. The man<br />
whose honour has been mistrusted, and who has been singled<br />
out for national humiliation, will remember it and sooner or<br />
later it will have to be atoned for. [54]<br />
Likewise <strong>the</strong> editorial writers <strong>of</strong> Toronto’s Globe commented, on<br />
21 August 1917 (see “The Naturalized Voters, page 4), “that no<br />
country could take a short cut to victory by wrong-doing without<br />
suffering moral loss and damage.” Condemning proposals to<br />
disfranchise naturalized citizens as “legally indefensible and morally<br />
wrong” <strong>the</strong> editorial went on to insist that those who had “settled in<br />
our midst at our invitation, trusting implicitly in our good faith”<br />
must not be “treacherously and without provocation and<br />
justification deprived <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rights as <strong>Canadian</strong> citizens because <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir race and blood.” And, readers were reminded, “<strong>the</strong> alien who is<br />
naturalized ceases to be an alien. He becomes a <strong>Canadian</strong> citizen.”<br />
Not everyone took so liberal a view. An anonymous correspondent<br />
from Toronto, whose letter was published on 28 August, asserted that<br />
quite a few people had not agreed with <strong>the</strong> paper’s stance, for a “German<br />
is always a German,” and <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> aliens from enemy states could<br />
be expected to vote for whatever political party went for peace at any<br />
price, which was simply not acceptable. Moreover, since Canada was a<br />
British possession, “everyone <strong>of</strong> British stock had to take commonsense<br />
steps to keep it that way,” which did not include allowing <strong>the</strong>se “aliens”<br />
a vote.<br />
36