1975 - Unmarried America

o
Oyler v. Bowles. 368 U.S. 448, 82 S.Ct. 501,
7l.Ed.2d 446 (1962) ................................... 25
Torrance v. Torrance, _ F.Supp. _ (D. Minn. 1975) ........... 10
Two Guys from Harrison Allentown, Inc. v. McGuinley,
366 U.S. 582, 81 S.Ct. 1135, 6l.Ed.2d 551 (1961) ............ 36
Padin v. Fordham Hospital, 392 F.Supp. 447
(S.D.N.Y.1975) .................. : ... ~ ................ 34
Palidino v. City of Omaha, 471 F.2d 812 (8th Cir. 1972) ......... 30
People v. Bonneville, 12t Cal. Rptr. 540, 535 P.2d 404
(1975) ........................•...................... 13·
People v. Burnick, 121 Cal. Rptr. 488, 535 P.2d 352 (1975) ...... 13
People v. Giani, 302 P.2d 813 (Cal. 1956) ...................... 9
People v. Gould, 532 P.2d 955 (Colo. 1975) ................... 16
People v. Harris, 5 Cal. Rptr. 852 (1960) ..................... 25
People v. Kelly, 57 Cal. Rptr. 363, 424 P.2d 947 (1967) ........... 9
People v. Rincon-Pineda, 123 Cal. Rptr. 363,
538 P.2d 247 (1975) .................................. 8,40
People v. N issinoff, 118 Cal. Rptr. 457 (1975) ................ .
People v. Nye, 237 P.2d 1 (Cal. 1951) ....•.................... 8
People v. Peters, 101 Cal. Rptr. 403 (1972) .................... 9
Peoplev. Putnam, 129 P.2d 367 (Cal. 1942) ................... 8
People v. Rossi, 134 Cal. Rptr. 64, 555 P.2d 1313 (1976) ......... 9
People v. Superior Court (Hartway), 128 Cal. Rptr. 519
(1976) ............................................... 36
People v. Triggs, 106 Cal. Rptr. 408, 506 P.2d 232
(1973) ............................................ 12, 19
People v. Trolinder, 264 P.2d 601 (Cal. 1953) ............ ; ..... 8
People v. York, 329 N.E.2d 845 (III. 1975) .................... 41
University of New Hampshire v. Bonner, 509 F.2d 652
(1st Cir. 1974) ........................... : ............ 19
U.S. v. Banks, 368 F.Supp. 1245 (W.D.S.D. 1973) .............. 25
U.S. v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171 (3rd Cir. 1973) ................. 25
U.S. v. Collins. 396 F.Supp. 629 (M.D.Pa. 1975) ............... 12
U.S. v. Cote, 413 U.S. 915, 93 S.Ct. 30E;)1, 37l.Ed.2d 1037
. (1972) ............................................... 35
U.S. v. Falk, 479 F.2d 616 (7th Cir. 1973) ..................... 25
U.S. v. McKean, 338 A.2d 439 (D.C. 1975) .................... 35
U.S. v. Moses, 339 A.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1975) ................ 24,25
U.S. v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218,94 S.Ct. 467, 38l.Ed.2d 427
(1973) .............•.•............................. 3, 13
U.S. v. Steele, 461 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1972) .................. 25
U.S. ex reI. Guy v. McCauley, 385 F. Supp. 193
(E.D. Wis. 1974) ......................................... 3
w
Wadev. San Francisco, 186 P.2d 181 (Cal. 1947) ...... , ....... 36
Rich v. State, 266 P.2d 476 (Okla. 1954) ..................... 30
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113,93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147
(1973) ...........................•................... 34
Rose v. Locke, 423 U.S. 48, 96 S.Ct. 243, 46l.Ed.2d 185
(1975) ........ , ................. " ................... 24
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 6 S.Ct. 1064,
30 l.Ed. 220 (1886) .................................... 25
Saxe v. Brier, 390 F.Supp. 635 (E.D. Wis. 1974) ............... 35
Smayda v. United States, 352 F.2d 251 (9th Cir. 1965), cert.
denied, 382 U.S. 981, 86 S.Ct. 5p5, 15 L.Ed.2d 471 (1966) ..... 19
Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 89 S.Ct. 1243,
22 l.Ed.2d 542 (1969) .................................. 35
State v. Bryant, 177 N.W.2d 800 (Minn. 1970) ................. 19
State v. Elliot, 539 P.2d 207 (N.M. 1975), overruled in
551 P.2d 1352 (N.M. 1976) ........... · ................... 34
State v. Geer, 533 P.2d 389 (Wash: 1975) ..................... 23
State v. Jarrell, 211 S.E.2d 837 (N.C. 1975) ................... 19
State v. Lindsay, 310 SO.2d 89 (La. 1975) .................... 23
State v. McFarlin, 517 P.2d 87 (Ar·iz. 1973). : ................. 24
State v. Ray, 193 N.W.2d 315 (Minn. 1971) •.................. 22
State v: Riley, 226 N.W.2d 907 (Minn. 1975) ............. : ..... 13
State v. Sawyer, 532 P.2d 654 (Wash. 1975) ................•. 19
State v. Valdez, 534 P.2d 449 (Ariz. 1975) ........ : ........... 24
BRIEF: A thorough memo~andum reviewing most proc~du~al.
and substantive leg~1 issues involved in raising
diSCriminatory enforcement In a criminal case can be obtained
by mailing $5.00 to cover postage and reproduction
costs of this 37-page Brief (revised 9-1-76) to the Los Angeles
office of the SexuaLawReporter clo BDE-1.
DONA TlONS TAX-DEDUCTIBLE: The Sexual Law Reporter,
Inc., (a non-profit corporation publishing the Sexua­
L,aw.Reporter) has received tax-exempt status under Section
5091(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Any contributions
above the respective subscription rate are now
tax-deductible by the donor. The publisher and editor will
consider donations earmarked by the donors for specific
projects relating to the area of sexual civil liberties.