12.11.2012 Views

The Barbie Case - The Arthur Page Society

The Barbie Case - The Arthur Page Society

The Barbie Case - The Arthur Page Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstract<br />

WINNING ENTRIES – COMMUNICATIONS/JOURNALISM SCHOOLS<br />

first place<br />

Yuliya Melnyk, Moushumi Anand<br />

Faculty Adviser: María Len-Ríos<br />

University of Missouri-Columbia<br />

How the Russian Company Pallet Trucks Used<br />

Public Relations Strategies to Protect its Business<br />

and the German Brand Pfaff-silberblau in Russia in 2001<br />

This case shows how crises can occur in a global economy. It<br />

describes how two companies, a German manufacturer and<br />

Russian retailer, partnered to combat a crisis when<br />

competitors started selling fake copies of the manufacturer’s<br />

“brand” equipment. Pfaff-silberblau is an established<br />

international company, headquartered in Germany, that<br />

manufactures lifting and handling equipment. Pallet Trucks,<br />

at the time, was its exclusive Russian vendor.<br />

While it is thought that smaller products such as make-up<br />

and electronic goods are easier to reproduce as fakes, it is<br />

assumed that heavy equipment like Jeeps or industrial goods<br />

cannot be easily duplicated. This case proves otherwise. Fake<br />

lifting and handling equipment was produced in a Chinese<br />

factory and sold in Russia under the Pfaff-silberblau brand<br />

name. As the counterfeit equipment began to cause profit<br />

losses and decreased consumer confidence in their brands,<br />

the companies worked together proactively, learned from the<br />

experience of their predecessors in new markets, and<br />

protected their brands. Specifically, this case highlights how<br />

public relations techniques can be used to address brand<br />

piracy in developing economies and New Independent<br />

Countries, when legal avenues are not feasible.<br />

A Short History of Branding<br />

It is an ancient practice to put markings on products to<br />

indicate who owned or made an item. For instance, the<br />

paintings on the walls of the Lascaux Caves in southern<br />

France contain marks that scholars say indicate ownership.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se paintings were made 5,000 years ago. Artisans used<br />

stone seals to indicate the manufacturer, and some found in<br />

the Middle East date back to 3500 B.C. (Infoplease Web site,<br />

2005). Not only did the marks indicate quality, but they also<br />

arthur w. page society<br />

let people know whom to blame if there was a problem with<br />

the product. A trademark can be found on the bottom of a<br />

sandal dated from 200 BC (Barlow & Stewart, 2004, p. 24).<br />

During the Middle Ages, trade guilds also began using marks<br />

to indicate who made a specific product. Bell makers were<br />

among the first to adopt the practice, followed by other<br />

manufacturers including paper makers. <strong>The</strong>y added<br />

watermarks so people would know who made a particular<br />

sheet.<br />

In 1266, the Bakers Marking Law, which governed the use of<br />

stamps or pinpricks on loaves of bread, was passed on. It is<br />

one of the earliest known laws on trademarks. Silversmiths<br />

were required to mark their products in 1363. Bottle makers<br />

and manufacturers followed suit, possibly influenced by<br />

Chinese porcelain, which bore markings indicating origin.<br />

One of the earliest court cases involving the improper use of<br />

a trademark occurred in England in 1618. <strong>The</strong> manufacturer<br />

of high-quality cloth sued a competitor who produced lowerquality<br />

cloth, but used the marking reserved for top-quality<br />

cloth. <strong>The</strong> case Southern v. How is considered the first case of<br />

actual trademark infringement. In 1876 England, the Bass<br />

Red Triangle was the first trademark to be registered<br />

(Feldwick, 1991, p. 19).<br />

Trademark Laws in the U.S.<br />

In the U.S., Thomas Jefferson urged the adoption of laws<br />

governing trademarks because of a 1791 dispute over sail<br />

cloth marks. While federal legislation was not forthcoming,<br />

some states passed their own laws. For instance, in 1842,<br />

Michigan required marks to indicate the origin of timber.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!