Dirty Light - Marko Ciciliani
Dirty Light - Marko Ciciliani
Dirty Light - Marko Ciciliani
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Disturbance in any signalling system. In electronics and engineering, noise refers to<br />
any disturbance, that does not represent part of the signal, such as static in a telephone<br />
or snow on a television screen. 25<br />
While this is not the place to discuss in detail the different meanings that noise took on in the<br />
course of the 20 th century, a few significant moments of music history will be pointed out.<br />
Here the objective is to demonstrate that noise is not only a sonic aspect of sound, but also –<br />
similarly to dirt in a social context – a contravention against an established musical practice.<br />
Also it will be shown that the gradual acceptance of noise as musical material not only<br />
liberated the range of available musical sounds, but also carefully maintained and redefined a<br />
set of prohibitions. Certain points in the history of western music in the 20 th century have in<br />
various ways torn down the barriers between accepted musical sound and noise, like the music<br />
of John Cage, Fluxus, Punk or the Japanese Onkyo scene. The inclusion of noise as musical<br />
material acquired new musical territories that were hitherto beyond the customary and thereby<br />
widened the range of accepted musical sounds.<br />
The line between sound and musical sound stood at the center of the existence of<br />
avant-garde music, supplying a heraldic moment of transgression and its artistic raw<br />
material, a border that had to be crossed to bring back unexploited resources, restock<br />
the coffers of musical materiality, and rejuvenate Western art music. 26<br />
It is important to notice, though, that every new musical idiom that came forth through this<br />
development also depended on the establishment of a new set of taboos.<br />
John Cage (1912-1992) for example placed the acceptance of all sorts of noise and activities<br />
into the centre of his work. 27 A second sort of noise – in the sense of an uncontrolled procedure<br />
– that he allowed to become part of the composition is chance, a method he used in order to<br />
eradicate the supreme position of the composer as the mastermind that governs the sounds. 28<br />
However, in order to let chance and the formerly suppressed noises step to the foreground, he<br />
had to eliminate all sorts of traditional musical communication between performers, like<br />
gestural cueing, expressive signalling or any other form of narrative activities. The liberation<br />
of sound that Cage was after in his music could only work by turning musical communication<br />
between musicians into a taboo. When musicians start to connect sounds as musical phrases<br />
25 Schaffer, Murray: The Soundscape, Rochester, Vermont: Destiny Books (1977), 182.<br />
26 Kahn, Douglas: Noise Water Meat, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1999), 69.<br />
27 Here I am exclusively referring to Cage’s music that used chance methods in the process of composition and/or<br />
realisation of the music. This is that case with most of his music after 1951.<br />
28 For another example of an artist who equates ‘dirt with ‘randomness’ see: Linde, Almut: “Radical Beauty”,<br />
interview with Oliver Zybok, in Kunstforum Vol.199, Ruppichteroth: Kunstforum International (2009), 190.<br />
42