Contractor: SGS Contact Info: PO - IDEAS-EC

NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT ~ REACH 12A
SOLICITATION NO. R12PS40005
Written Questions:
Contractor: SGS
Contact Info: P.O. Box 44154 Tucson, 85733; Ph: (520) 321-4644
Question: Can Contractor pothole to demonstrate need to blast If so, how often (distance)
Response: Section 31 23 05-1 (Blasting) spells out the criteria that will be used to determine
when payment will be made for blasting. A 400 hp (or larger) ripper or 300 hp (or larger)
excavator shall be used to demonstrate the rock is not rippable. Geological investigations were
conducted by Reclamation and are available for review in Section 53 40 00 (Geological
Investigations). Section 31 23 22-2 lists Reclamation’s assumptions of where blasting may be
required for determining quantities listed in the Bid Schedule. The Contractor will be able to
conduct his own investigations at intervals that are of interest for his planning needs. However,
Reclamation will only pay for blasting where the payment criterion is demonstrated.
Supplier/Manufacture: NW Pipe Company
Contact Info: Adelanto, California
Question: Is there a requirement for “outside” inspection (USBR) at the pipe Manufacture’s
facility
Response: In accordance with the paragraphs applicable to each pipe type (Section 33 11 11 part
2.06 ~ Steel Pipe; Section 33 11 12 part 2.05 ~ PVC Pipe; and, Section 33 11 13 part 2.06
Ductile Iron Pipe), Reclamation reserves the right to conduct investigations during and after
manufacture. Arrangements will be made with the successful bidder if Reclamation wishes to
exercise this right. Please be aware in accordance with Section 35 22 14 (Valves and
Equipment), Reclamation reserves the right to do inspections during the manufacture of valves as
well.
Question: If “outside” inspection will be required, who is covering the cost Is there a penalty if
the pipe, lining, coating, and fabrication all take place at different locations
Response: Inspection will be accordance with Clause I.41 (52.246-12 ~ Inspection of
Construction) and relevant clauses within the specifications (i.e. pipe, valve, etc.).
Question: Is there a requirement to manufacture, line, coat, and fabricate the pipe at the same
location This will improve the quality, timeliness, communication, and reduce outside
inspection costs.
Response: No
Question: Recommend that the completed pipe meet certain quality assurance national standards
– above and beyond the AWWA Standards (i.e. ISO-9001 or Lloyds’ of London).
Response: Accepted, refer to revised specification 33 11 10 – Pipeline General Requirements.
1

Question: Is this a federally funded project
Response: Yes, Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project is a federally funded project.
Question: If it is a federally funded project, does the Buy American Act Apply
Response: Yes, please see amended solicitation clauses.
Question: What is the anticipated award date for the contract to the Contractor
Response: Award is expected late March to mid-April.
Question: Is the Bureau able to pre-pay for finished pipe at the Manufacturers plant
Response: See updated section B of the solicitation for more information.
Contractor: Garney Construction.
Contact Info: 7911 Shaffer Parkway, Littleton, CO 80127; (720) 420-4881.
Question: Can the bid date be pushed back
Response: No.
Contractor: Elstrom Construction
Contact Info: none provided.
Question: Can the pipe be sectioned off during testing
Response: Yes, please see amended specification paragraphs.
Question: Construction water
Response: Section 01 51 00 (Temporary Utilities), lists potential sources for construction water.
Offeror’s will need to contact entities listed to get pricing and location information.
Question: Where do we list NM Gross Receipts Tax and Terro Tax
Response: Include in bid prices. No separate line item will be provided for taxes.
Question: Email address of the Point of Contact
Response: Point of Contact is George Kuechmann; gkuechmann@usbr.gov; (505) 462-3624.
Question: Clarify Pipe Materials
Response: Sections 33 11 10, 33 11 11, 33 11 12, and 33 11 13 discuss the requirements for the
allowable pipe materials. Allowable pipe materials are Steel, PVC (at appropriate pressure
range), and Ductile Iron Pipe. Bidders shall select the type of pipe to be used during the
preparation of their bid. It is anticipated that the overall price for the installation of the pipe
taking the cost of materials, excavation costs, embedment and backfill costs, etc will be a prime
consideration in this decision. Other factors determined by the bidder may also be a
consideration in the decision on the type of pipe to be used.
Question: Can the submittal time frame be reduced from 40 to 10 days Is there any way to
change the submittal review
Response: Section 01 33 00 (Submittals) reserves 40 days for Government review of each
2

submittal or re-submittal. Offeror’s should assume that Government review will require this full
duration.
Question: Will the Government consider procurement of the concrete to keep pricing equal
Response: In accordance with Section 03 30 00 (Cast-In-Place Concrete) the Contractor will be
required to procure the concrete.
Question: Air Quality/Dust Control
Response: Section 01 57 20 (Environmental Controls) covers the requirements for Dust and Air
Quality Controls. Section 31 02 10 (Water for Dust Abatement) provides payment for the water
used for dust control. See also Specification Section 31 02 20 (Dust Palliative).
Contractor: Saguaro Geo Services.
Contact Info: P.O. Box 44154 Tucson, 85733; (520) 321-4644.
Question: If water is not present in drill holes and vibration/fly rock considerations are
controlled is there any likelihood that ANFO can be permitted/allowed for blasting
Response: In accordance with Section 31 23 05, ANFO is not allowed unless otherwise
approved by the Contracting Officers Representative. Determination on use of ANFO will not
be made until actual conditions are evaluated.
Contractor: Yenter Companies, Inc.
Contact Info: 20300 W. Hwy 72, Arvada, CO 80007; (303) 279-4458.
Question: Will explosive magazines be allow to be stored on the easement (ROW), or will they
be stored off-site
Response: In accordance with Section 31 23 05 (Blasting), Explosives shall be stored off-site.
Question: Will the blasting be required only after the rock is completely exposed and tested for
rippability Or, can the contractor be allowed to pot-hole along the easement for rock to
eliminate the need for open trench blasting
Response: Section 31 23 05, 1.01 (Blasting) spells out the criteria that will be used to determine
when payment will be made for blasting. A 400 hp (or larger) ripper or 300 hp (or larger)
excavator shall be used to demonstrate the rock is not rippable. Geological investigations were
conducted by Reclamation and are available for review in Section 53 40 00 (Geological
Investigations). Section 31 23 22-2 lists Reclamation’s assumptions of where blasting may be
required for determining quantities listed in the Bid Schedule. The Contractor will be able to
conduct his own investigations at intervals that are of interest for his planning needs. However,
Reclamation will only pay for blasting where the payment criterion is demonstrated.
Question: How close are the Navajo Nation Water Department wells to the pipeline easement
Where are they
Response: Section 01 51 00 (Temporary Utilities), lists potential sources for construction water.
Offeror’s shall need to contact entities listed to get pricing and location information.
Question: Any blasting permits required by the Navajo Nation
3

Response: In accordance with Specification Section 31 23 05 (Blasting), Part 1.07, Contractor
Requirements, Paragraph B; Contractor is responsible to meet all federal, state, local, and tribal
regulations. Also see Part 3.01, General, A.; The Contractor needs to obtain approval of
submitted Blasting Plan and all required permits. And, FAR 52.236-07, Permits and
Responsibilities.
Contractor: A&A Drilling and Blasting.
Contact Info: 20315 W. Beloat Rd., Buckeye, Az; (623) 386-1212.
Question: Are the blasting numbers for cubic yard or linear foot
Response: Section 31 23 05 (Blasting) provides for payment by the cubic yard.
Contractor: Aimone-Martin Assoc. LLC (Blasting and Vibration control).
Contact Info: 1005 Bullock Ave, Socorro, NM 87801; (505) 970-9949.
Response: Questions submitted referred to previously submitted questions and review of
attached documentation. Response to questions are addressed below.
Contractor: North Wind
Contact Info: 1425 Higham Street, Idaho Falls, ID 83402; Phone: (208) 557-0862
Question: Section B – Supplies or Services and Prices, Item B.1(e) denoted that New Mexico
Gross Receipts Tax and Navajo Nation Gross Receipts Tax are to be included as a separate line
item in the offer. The schedule of values CLIN 1 through 54 does not address these costs. Where
shall the bidder itemize these taxes in their offer
Response: Item B.1(e) has been edited by amendment. Taxes shall be included in bid prices.
No separate line item will be provided for taxes. In accordance with Section B.1(e), contractors
are responsible “to ensure all applicable New Mexico and Navajo Nation gross receipts tax are
included in their Proposals”.
Question: Based on the bid break-down this appears to be a unit price contract. Who and how
are the actual quantities measured for payment
Response: The Bid Schedule lists the applicable Sections for each pay item. Paragraph 1.01
(Measurement and Payment) in each Section lists how each line in the Bid Schedule shall be
measure and payment applied. See also FAR 52.232-05 (Payments under Fixed-Price
Construction Contracts), FAR 52.236-16 (Quantity Surveys), and Section 01 71 20, Part 3.02
(Quantity Surveys).
Question: Section L.12, Page 70 of 84, denotes Offeror past performance and experience during
the past 3 years, and the Evaluation Criteria, page 81 of 84, denotes past performance during the
last 5 years. Which is it We are leaning toward 5 years.
Response: The past performance requirements have been clarified in the amended documents.
4

Contractor: NOV Ameron.
Contact Info: 2325 South 7 th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034; Phone (602) 252-7111.
Question: Section 33 11 11, 2.01 D. 1. – Butt weld joints are called out on drawings for the steep
areas. Is a backer bar required for the butt weld joints
Response: Yes, refer to revised specification 33 11 11 – Steel Line Pipe
Question: Section 33 11 11, 3.03 A. 3. – Field coating of joints references Section 09 96 02. Is
this Section 09 96 20
Response: Yes the Section number is 09 96 20 – Coatings.
Question: Section 09 96 20 – Field coating of joints is not addressed in this section. Are heat
shrink sleeves required
Response: Yes, refer to revised specification 09 96 20 – Coatings.
Contractor: Aimone-Martin Assoc. LLC (Blasting and Vibration control).
Contact Info: 1005 Bullock Ave, Socorro, NM 87801; (505) 970-9949.
Question: Request the Bureau of Reclamation consider the wording of three items for the
purpose of clarification and providing consistency with blasting industry protocols and
guidelines. These are as follows:
Section 3.21 Monitoring, B. 2. on page 31 23 05 – 26; “…seismographs shall not be placed
inside of a structure … shall be placed on secured to sound bedrock or … soil, or mass concrete
foundation.”
Section 3.21 Monitoring, C. 1. B. on page 31 23 05 – 26; “…to determine background levels on
structures within 1,500 feet”
It appears the baseline monitoring is required to be performed on structures while blast vibration
monitoring required that geophones are not to be placed in structures (and by default construed
as on structures). Industry standards used to comply with safe blasting vibration criteria
recommended by the US Bureau of Mines in 1980 (Siskind D. E., et al., 1980 Structure
Response and Damage Produced by Ground Vibrations from Surface Mine blasting, RI 8507, US
Bureau of Mines) specify all geophone measurements shall be in the ground adjacent to
structures. If this is not possible, geophone attachment to structure foundations may be used. To
be consistent with industry practices, baseline monitoring should be performed in the ground
next to structures.
Recommend wording in Section 3.21 Monitoring, C. 1. B. be changed to specify that baseline
vibration measurements be made in the ground adjacent to structures within 1500 feet.
Response: Refer to revised specification 32 23 05 – Blasting.
5

Question: Table 31 23 05-1, page 32 23 05-28 standard for allowable peak particle velocity
(PPV)
Vibration limits for structures by structure type include 2.0 in/s for interior drywall and 4.0 in/s
for interior plaster on lath walls of older homes. We believe the 4.0 in/s limit for aged structures
with interior plaster that is more fragile than drywall is in error. This limit should be lower than
that specified for structured with modern drywall. US Bureau of Mines, RI 8507 provides
recommendations and guidelines for safe blasting next to structure with these types of interior
wall surfaces. These standards are widely used in the US blasting industry for vibration and air
over pressure monitoring.
Recommend the values in Table 31 23 05-1 be changed to values that are consistent with current
industry criteria for the protection of structure interior wall surfaces.
Response: Refer to revised Specification.
Question: Section 3.21 Monitoring, b. 1. A. on page 31 23 05-25; “Provide up to… with
specifications that show event sampling rates of 15,000 samples per second or higher, available
from PMT … or VCE …”
A sampling rate of 15,000 samples per second for blast vibration measurements is far in excess
of industry standards for velocity sensors used with blasting-type seismographs. This sample
rate is more appropriate for accelerometers used in extremely high-frequency environments.
The International Society of Explosives Engineers (ISEE, http://www.isee.org) sponsors the
Blast Vibration and Seismograph Section through which members set performance standards for
seismograph use
(http://www.isee.org/index.phpoption=com_content&view=article&id=224:vibrationsection&catid=51:sections&Itemid=158).
The Field Practice Guidelines for Blasting Seismographs, 2009 Edition, is available from the
above site and attached herein for your review. The guidelines set forth operating and use
specifications recommended by world-wide industry leaders and researchers. On page 2,
recommendations for sample rate states it should be set “at least 1000 samples per second”.
Blasting seismographs manufactured by White Seismology and Instantel (two of the most widely
used blasting seismographs around the world) do not currently offer sample rates greater than
2048 and 4096, respectively, for normal blasting with velocity geophones. This is because higher
rates are not needed for ground vibration frequencies from blasting that range between 4 Hz (for
softer rocks) to 350 Hz (for close-in monitoring in harder rock). Based on our experience
blasting in the Gallup area, we anticipate ground motion frequencies to range from 10 to 30 Hz
depending on measurement distance from the blast site. Thus, sample rates above 2048 for
blasting applications are not required based on the Nyquist sampling criterion.
6

PMT (http://www.pmtvib.com) builds measurement systems for elevator and escalator vibration
analysis (EVA-625 model). The company website does not provide evidence that blasting-type
seismographs complying with ISEE standards are available or manufactured by PMT.
VCE (http://www.vceinc.com) is a consulting firm that specializes in seismic monitoring,
forensics investigations, and video productions. They are fine company with excellent engineers.
To my knowledge, they do not manufacture blasting-type seismograms.
Recommend the reference to specific companies in this section be replaced by wording that
requires blasting-type seismographs to be used for the project and their use complies with the
ISEE Field Practice Guidelines for Blasting Seismographs, 2009 Edition, as well as the
Performance Specification for Blasting Seismographs (attached).
Response: Section 31 23 05 – Blasting doesn’t specify how many samples per second must be
obtained, only that the equipment must be capable of taking 15,000 samples or higher.
The Government has used instruments capable of taking 15,000 samples on other projects.
Specific manufacturers’ have been removed.
Question: Is there a need to establish permission to place seismographs on/at homes/structures
Response: The contractor shall be responsible for obtaining written permission to enter/place
equipment on property outside of the construction ROW shown on the drawings. Refer to
revised Section 31 23 05- Blasting.
Contractor: LifeLast.
Contact Info: 1301 NE 144 th Street, Suite 125, Vancouver, WA 98685; Phone: (360) 254-0563.
Question: Specification 09 96 20-16, Tabulation No. 01 (099CT_31.DOC): Archive 4-mil
surface profile, minimum.
There is not a need to require 4-mil minimum.
Recommend amending to read, “Achieve 3-mil surface profile, minimum”
Response: Reclamation requires a 4 mil surface profile.
Question: Specification 09 96 20-16, Tabulation No. 01 (099CT_31.DOC): Material option:
Areas 1-inch square or less, use of polyethylene melt stick is permitted.
The Coating Repair Patch is commonly used in the field for small repairs on pipeline and
delivers strong corrosion protection properties and is user friendly during application in a variety
of installation environments.
Recommend amending to read, “Areas 1-inch square or less, use of polyethylene melt stick or
Coating Repair Patch (CRP) is permitted”.
7

Response: Refer to revised Specification 09 96 20 – Coatings.
Question: Specification 09 96 20-40, Category BE-5A: The approved products are Madison
Chemical’s Corropipe II Omni and ITW Futura Coating’s Protec II.
LifeLast, Inc. DuraShield 210 meets the composition and physical characteristics with the
exception of the 1:1 ratio requirement. LifeLast DuraShield polyurethanes have been used very
successfully on many miles of welded steel pipe ranging in diameter from 4” to 184” for over
eight years. Included in our case histories is The Bureau of Reclamation’s Deer Flats Dams
Project for raw water transmission through 7,900 lineal feet of 42” diameter welded steel pipe.
This, combined with the fact that the physical properties of the LifeLast DuraShield 210 are well
above both the AWWA C222 Standard and the specifications of this project, supports that the
mix ratio of the material is not predictive of the success of a coating or lining in the welded steel
pipe market. In addition, the epoxies used as linings and coatings in the welded steel pipe market
for the past 15+ years have varying mix ratios – from 2:1 to 4:1 – further representing that mix
ratio has little relevance to the successful performance of a coating or lining on steel pipe.
Additionally, LifeLast’s DuraShield 210 and 310 have passed Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California’s minimum requirements for immersion use.
Recommend amending Category BE-5A to add LifeLast DuraSheild 210 as follows: DuraShield
210; as manufactured by: LifeLast, Inc., 1301 NE 144th Street, Suite 125, Vancouver, WA
98685, www.LifeLast.com Under Physical Characteristics, please remove the mix ratio
requirement.
Response: Refer to revised Section 09 96 20 – Coatings.
Contractor: Ferguson Waterworks, Albuquerque
Contact Info: 801 Candelaria NE, Albuquerque, NM 87107; Phone: (505) 449-4900
Question: Request clarification of the Pipe Type that is preferred. The specification gives three
choices, C900, C905, and Ductile Iron pipe. Which one is what is to be quoted on this project
Response: Sections 33 11 10, 33 11 11, 33 11 12, and 33 11 13 discuss the requirements for the
allowable pipe materials. Allowable pipe materials are Steel, PVC (at appropriate pressure
range), and Ductile Iron Pipe (except on steep slopes). Bidders shall select the type of pipe to be
used during the preparation of their bid. It is anticipated that the overall price for the installation
of the pipe taking the cost of materials, excavation costs, embedment and backfill costs, etc will
be a prime consideration in this decision. Other factors determined by the bidder may also be a
consideration in the decision on the type of pipe to be used.
8

Contractor: Northwest Pipe Company.
Contact Info: 555 Broadway, Blvd NE, Suite 100, Albuquerque, NM 87102; Phone: (505) 462-
3624.
Question: Spec 33 11 11 – 1.04.A: To insure experience and quality of manufacture please make
new requirement “B” that states, “Pipe Manufacturer / Fabricator:
1. Experienced in fabricating pipe of similar diameters, lengths, and wall thickness required
for the Work.
2. Steel Pipe Fabricators Association (SPFA), Lloyd’s Registry Certification, or ISO 9000
Certification.
3. Demonstrate current production capability for volume of work required for this Project.
4. Experience shall include successful fabrication to AWWA C200 standards of at least
30,000 linear feet of 42-inch diameter or larger pipe, with wall thickness of 1/4 inches or
greater, within past 5-year period within the United States of America.
5. Experience shall be applicable to fabrication plant facilities and personnel, not company
or corporation that currently owns fabrication facility or employs personnel.
6. Steel pipe, fittings, specials, coating, and linings shall be the product of and applied by
one manufacturer.
Response: Refer to revised Section 33 11 11 – Steel Line Pipe.
Question: Spec 33 11 11 – 2.01.C.1: Please add the following sentence to end of section, “Steel
shall be ordered in accordance with tolerances in accordance with AWWA C200-05 section
4.7.3.”
Response: Section 2.01 A.2 indicates line pipe shall be fabricated in in accordance AWWA C
200.
Question: Spec 33 11 11 – 2.01.C [Table]: Please replace table with the following table:
Pipe
Symbol
Minimum Steel
Wall
Thickness, (Inches)
42B100 0.175
42C125 0.175
42C225 0.175
42D225 0.175
42B250 0.175
42C250 0.175
42C275 0.175
42B300 0.175
42C300 0.175
42D300 0.175
42E300 0.175
42B325 0.175
42C325 0.175
9

42B350 0.175
42C350 0.175
42D350 0.178
42B375 0.178
42C375 0.178
42B400 0.190
42C400 0.190
42D400 0.190
42B425 0.202
42B450 0.214
42B475 0.226
42C475 0.226
42B500 0.237
42C500 0.237
These wall thicknesses are calculated in accordance with AWWA C200-05, page xii
and AWWA Manual M11, Steel Water Pipe: A Guide for Design & Installation,
Chapter 4, Eq 4-1 with a steel grade of 40,000 psi. Wall thicknesses are governed
by internal pressure. Earth loadings are addressed by allowable deflections and soil
types in other parts of the specifications and should not limit minimum wall
thicknesses. Installation contractor is bound by performance standards to limit pipe
deflection.
Response: Refer to revised Specifications table 33 11 11A. – Minimum Steel Wall Thickness for
Symbol Pipe. The table now uses standard pipe wall thicknesses listed in AWWA M-11.
Question: Spec 33 11 11 – 2.01.D.2: Request revise sentence to state, “Weld lap weld
joints inside or outside, or both as required for pressure restraint.”
Response: When the contractor chooses to use welded joints instead of gasketed joints, the joint
shall be double lap welded.
Question: Spec 33 11 11 – 2.05.A.1: Recommend modifying the hydrotest value to state,
“…which stresses steel to 0.75 times the specified minimum yield point of the steel used, in
accordance with AWWA C200-05, Section 5.2.1.” Current stress requirement of 23,000 lb/in²
equates to 57.5% of yield and not the 75% required by AWWA C200-05.
Current specification requires (15) minute hydro test hold time. This requirement
far exceeds what is required by AWWA C200. Current AWWA requirements, shown on page 24
of AWWA C200-05 Standard, states, “5.2.1.1 Other requirements. The [shop] test pressure
shall be held for sufficient time to observe the weld seams.” Standard practice to achieve this
visual leak inspection is (30) seconds or less depending on operator experience and pipe
diameter. In the case of 42-inch diameter pipe, 30-seconds is ample time for in-plant hydrostatic
testing. Hold times in excess of (30) seconds will not add value to the pipe system, but will
absolutely add additional costs to manufacture. As a comparison, the ductile iron pipe standard
AWWA C151, requires hydro test pressure held for (5) seconds. PVC has even lower
requirements for hydro testing.
10

Response: Refer to revised 33 11 11-Pipeline General Requirements, section 2.05. The current
version of the specifications refer to AWWA C200, instead of the 15 minute hold time.
Question: Spec 33 11 11 – 2.05.A.1.a: Request revision of this statement to read, “Test sections
prior to forming of lap weld bell and spigot joints and o-ring gasketed bells and spigots.” Testing
of cylinders with shapes already formed could distort joint shape and dimensions. This is
consistent with current industry practices.
Response: Refer to revised 33 11 11- Pipeline General Requirements paragraph 2.05.
Question: Spec 33 11 11 – 2.05.A.2: Recommend adding new section “e” that states, “In lieu of
hydrostatic pressure test for fittings made from untested hydrostatic tested cylinders, do one of
the following.”:
1. Spot radiographically examine pipe in accordance with ASME BPVC Sec VIII, Div. 1,
Par. UW 52. Ultrasonically examine welds that cannot readily be radiographed.
a. Fillet Welds: 100 percent examine using magnetic particle inspection method in
accordance with ASME BPVC SEC VIII, Division 1.
b. Groove Welds: 100 percent ultrasonically examine those that cannot be readily
radiographically spot examined in accordance with ASME BPVC SEC VIII,
Division 1.
c. Air test collars and wrappers in accordance with AWWA C206.
Response: Reclamation requires the welds and steel plate to be tested with a hydrostatic pressure
test.
Question: 33 11 11 – 3.01.E.2: Request revise sentence to state, “Air test double lap welds in
accordance with AWWA C206.”
Response: Refer to revised specification 33 11 11 – Steel Line Pipe, paragraph 3.01.
Question: 33 11 11 – 3.05.A.1: Request revise value to state, “3 percent of nominal pipe
diameter.” This is consistent with AWWA Manual M11, Steel Water Pipe: A Guide for Design
& Installation, Chapter 6, Pg. 61.
Response: Reclamation requires 2% deflection criteria during installation and initial loading to
ensure that the AWWA deflections are not exceeded over time.
Question: Spec 09 96 20 – 3.10: Tabulation No. 01 – Option 3 Polyurethane: Request revised
surface preparation profile to 3-mil minimum.
Response: Reclamation requires a 4 mil surface profile.
Question: Spec 09 96 20 – 3.10: Tabulation No. 02 : Request deletion of surface preparation
method “C” and revise to state, “Surface preparation in accordance with AWWA C205-07,
Section 4.3.” Cement mortar lined pipe should not be blasting prior to application.
Response: Refer to revised Section 09 96 20 – Coatings.
Question: Spec 09 96 20 – 3.11: Coating Category BE-5A: Request revised sentence to state,
“mix ration as required by polyurethane manufacturer.”
Response: Refer to revised Section 09 96 20 – Coatings.
11

Question: Section B – Bid Schedule: Recommend combining bid items 18 through 43 into a
single bid item. This will simplify the proposal for manufacturers and interested bidders.
Response: The current bid schedule facilitates field changes in quantities of specific class of
pipe.
Question: Additional Information: Are there any Buy American Act requirements on materials
Response: Yes, please see amended solicitation clauses.
12