19.01.2015 Views

Guidance for Part I Trainees taking Physiological Measurement

Guidance for Part I Trainees taking Physiological Measurement

Guidance for Part I Trainees taking Physiological Measurement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Institute of Physics & Engineering in Medicine<br />

<strong>Guidance</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Part</strong> 1 <strong>Trainees</strong> <strong>taking</strong><br />

<strong>Physiological</strong> <strong>Measurement</strong><br />

1. The <strong>Part</strong> 1 <strong>Physiological</strong> <strong>Measurement</strong> competencies were written to accommodate the wide range<br />

of measurements and techniques that may be studied. As a consequence, the advice given as to<br />

the standard expected may be variable. The following guidance has been prepared by the IPEM<br />

Examiners <strong>for</strong> <strong>Physiological</strong> <strong>Measurement</strong>, and is offered to help improve the first-time pass rate in<br />

this subject.<br />

2. The portfolio must provide evidence that all the required competencies have been met. Otherwise,<br />

an examiner has to satisfy him/herself during the viva that you have the competencies which are not<br />

fully met in the portfolio.<br />

3. Make sure you include a table or other means of listing the required competencies that crossreferences<br />

where in the portfolio the evidence <strong>for</strong> each competency is located.<br />

4. Competencies PM 1.1 and PM 1.2 are different. PM 1.1 requires that you demonstrate a broad<br />

understanding of the (1) principles, (2) relevant physiology, and (3) measurement significance of<br />

common physiological measurement procedures.<br />

5. PM 1.2 requires that you demonstrate a detailed understanding of the (1) principles, (2) relevant<br />

physiology and (3) measurement significance of three selected parameters.<br />

6. A broad understanding of common physiological procedures implies a less-detailed understanding<br />

is expected than <strong>for</strong> the three selected <strong>for</strong> PM 1.2. Common physiological measurements would be<br />

expected to include non-invasive blood pressure measurement and ECG. Short term<br />

acquaintanceships, in addition to your three main areas, are ideally suited to PM 1.1.<br />

7. In PM 1.1, it is mandatory that among the physiological measurements covered, at least one must<br />

be a pressure measurement, one a flow measurement and one must be electrophysiological.<br />

8. The principles of a physiological measurement procedure would include knowledge of how the<br />

relevant transducers (or electrodes) convert a physical measurement or event into a signal that can<br />

be amplified, processed and displayed and, where appropriate, how that signal would be affected by<br />

transducer position, patient orientation, environmental or other relevant factors.<br />

9. The relevant physiology should put the measurement into a clinical context – why it is done, what is<br />

the physiological state or change that is to be detected, how does that relate to the physical event<br />

detected or measurement actually made (including limitations or assumptions that have to be<br />

made).<br />

10. The measurement significance is expected to include both statistical and clinical significance of the<br />

measurement and the extent to which it affects further patient management.<br />

11. Additional detail required <strong>for</strong> PM 1.2 is given by PM 1.2.1 – 1.2.6. All six aspects must be covered<br />

<strong>for</strong> each measurement, unless clearly non-applicable in some specific case. It is accepted that the<br />

amount of detail given to each of PM 1.2.1 – 1.2.6 will vary between the three selected<br />

measurements. The following suggestions are given as to how these competencies might be<br />

achieved.<br />

12. To identify and justify the choice of equipment, you could ask questions such as: Are there<br />

alternatives What are the pros and cons of the various options Is the method used the best<br />

possible Why was this particular technology/manufacturer/model chosen Why is a particular<br />

transducer/ electrode/sensor used Why is the particular electrode/transducer/etc placed where it<br />

is What is its sensitivity pattern within the body How accurately does it have to be positioned<br />

Could the in<strong>for</strong>mation be obtained from a different position Are there advantages/disadvantages of<br />

different positions<br />

Clinical Scientists' Education and Training Panel<br />

June 2009<br />

1 of 2<br />

<strong>Guidance</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Part</strong> 1 <strong>Trainees</strong><br />

<strong>Physiological</strong> <strong>Measurement</strong>


13. Hands-on experience is essential. The trainee should actively contribute to the patient<br />

measurement wherever possible and ethical. In most cases, training can progress to “push buttons”<br />

under supervision, or to use the equipment on a normal volunteer, or a test phantom. Where this is<br />

not possible, hands-on experience of using the equipment can be obtained by allowing the trainee<br />

to per<strong>for</strong>m a calibration check or similar.<br />

14. <strong>Trainees</strong> should understand how the signal can be modified at each step from the actual<br />

physiological change to the final recording or measurement. This might include concepts such as<br />

transducer sensitivity patterns, transfer functions, resonance frequencies, phase changes, analogue<br />

and digital filters and any other signal processing technique appropriate to the measurement. A<br />

trainee should also know about possible interfering signals, where these might come from and how<br />

they can be minimised.<br />

15. <strong>Trainees</strong> are expected to understand the limitations of the measurements made in terms of<br />

measurement uncertainty, assumptions made, discrepancies between what is actually measured<br />

and what, ideally, is wanted. Sources of artefact and how these might be recognised should be<br />

understood. <strong>Measurement</strong>s should be accompanied by an estimate of the uncertainty and, where<br />

appropriate, the rationale <strong>for</strong> that estimate. A scientist at this level should never report<br />

measurements with an unjustifiable number of significant figures!<br />

16. The statistical methods used will depend on the context of the three parameters studied in detail, so<br />

no list will be given of what methods a trainee must know. However, an understanding is expected<br />

of the concepts of normal ranges and thresholds and how these are obtained. The significance or<br />

otherwise of measurements close to these threshold(s) should be understood, as should type I and<br />

type II errors.<br />

17. Where routine calibration checks are automatic processes, these are not acceptable <strong>for</strong><br />

demonstrating competency PM 1.2.5. Calibrations must be per<strong>for</strong>med with external standards of<br />

pressure, flow, voltage, current or whatever. An understanding would be expected of calibration<br />

standards, offset, linearity, hysteresis, drift and repeatability, and how these affect accuracy and<br />

precision.<br />

18. Where appropriate, the trainee should be involved in reporting. Portfolios might include trial patient<br />

reports written by the trainee at the time, possibly with a discussion of any discrepancy with the<br />

report actually issued. Otherwise, anonymous case studies could illustrate a clinical problem,<br />

discuss how the physiological measurement contributes to patient management and, where<br />

possible, discuss the outcome in the particular case.<br />

19. Electrical safety tests of medical equipment are often automated but the trainee should have a<br />

broad understanding of what these measure, and why. They should have some knowledge of:<br />

20. the general concept of safety in a single fault condition and the need <strong>for</strong> regular maintenance or<br />

other means to identify a single fault state,<br />

21. what a leakage current is,<br />

22. what the symbols mean, that most commonly appear on the outside of a medical device,<br />

23. what an applied part is and what the designations B, BF and CF signify,<br />

24. the basic principles of electrical safety as applied to medical electrical systems, and as applied to<br />

multiple devices connected to the same patient.<br />

25. about the system <strong>for</strong> reporting adverse incidents to the MHRA.<br />

26. The trainee should know about the Medical Devices Directive, what is its purpose, what the CE<br />

mark signifies and the role of the MHRA as the Competent Authority in the UK.<br />

27. The trainee would be expected to know about standards and guidelines relevant to the parameters<br />

studied in PM 1.2.<br />

Dr Steve Pye<br />

Chief Examiner<br />

3 rd June 2009<br />

Clinical Scientists' Education and Training Panel<br />

June 2009<br />

2 of 2<br />

<strong>Guidance</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Part</strong> 1 <strong>Trainees</strong><br />

<strong>Physiological</strong> <strong>Measurement</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!