HR and Reorganisation - CIPD
HR and Reorganisation - CIPD
HR and Reorganisation - CIPD
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Managing Change in the Civil Service<br />
<strong>HR</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reorganisation</strong>:<br />
From Dilemmas to Delivery<br />
© Duncan Brown<br />
Assistant Director General<br />
15 July 2004
<strong>CIPD</strong> <strong>and</strong> Managing Change<br />
• The Psychological Contract<br />
• Organising for Success<br />
• People Management <strong>and</strong> Performance<br />
• From Research into Practice
The State of the Psychological <br />
Contract in the Public Sector<br />
• Declining levels of employee<br />
satisfaction <strong>and</strong> commitment;<br />
7.3<br />
Satisfaction with work<br />
7.2<br />
• Lowest sector ratings in central<br />
7.1<br />
government;<br />
7<br />
• Related to:<br />
- lower levels of trust;<br />
6.9<br />
6.8<br />
- less freedom/more controls; 6.7<br />
- more change;<br />
6.6<br />
- lower involvement.<br />
1998 2000 2001 2002<br />
Public Sector<br />
Private Sector
The <strong>CIPD</strong>’s Organising for Success <br />
Project<br />
• Objectives:<br />
- produce knowledge/tools to help <strong>HR</strong><br />
- thereby improve the success rates.<br />
• Method:<br />
- initial questionnaire survey<br />
- case studies in 12 organisations;<br />
- follow-up survey on key issues;<br />
- workshops groups;<br />
- publications <strong>and</strong> tools.
Organising for Success: Initial <br />
Findings<br />
• Lots of reorganisation <strong>and</strong> change;<br />
• Changes are shaped:<br />
- by prior experiences of<br />
executives (76%);<br />
- external learning (30%).<br />
• Causes in the wider environment:<br />
- merger/acquisition/Government: 53%<br />
- decline in performance: 53%<br />
- new CE: 50%<br />
- market/service changes: 48%<br />
“We are under<br />
pressure to<br />
increase<br />
efficiency…<br />
unfortunately our<br />
senior<br />
management<br />
equates that with<br />
shedding staff”.<br />
<strong>HR</strong> participant
What’s Involved<br />
• 85% make redundancies;<br />
• But two-thirds recruit;<br />
• 83% employees move to new jobs;<br />
• 44% extensive change in senior management positions;<br />
• 42% changes in organisational culture;<br />
• 25% extensive change in accounting <strong>and</strong> IT systems;<br />
• 26% other business processes.<br />
• Training<br />
In project<br />
management<br />
27%<br />
For employees<br />
affected<br />
52%
Who’s involved: Employees<br />
36%<br />
Employees<br />
part ici pated on<br />
design<br />
41%<br />
“Employees rarely have the<br />
opportunity to shape the<br />
development <strong>and</strong> management<br />
of reorganisations”.<br />
Survey Report<br />
82%<br />
Programme of<br />
c ommunicat ions<br />
“At the start of the process we had<br />
a staff side of 8. Now we have 40<br />
reps”<br />
Employer Representative<br />
82%<br />
“We didn’t involve the unions until<br />
all the decisions had been made<br />
…. there just wasn't time”<br />
<strong>HR</strong> Director
How Far is <strong>HR</strong> Involved<br />
“<strong>HR</strong> issues<br />
such as career<br />
<strong>and</strong> reward<br />
structures are<br />
relatively<br />
neglected in<br />
comparison, for<br />
example, with<br />
accounting <strong>and</strong><br />
IT changes …<br />
though involved<br />
<strong>HR</strong> people were<br />
generally not<br />
leading these<br />
programmes”.<br />
Internal OD<br />
External<br />
consultant<br />
<strong>HR</strong> specialist<br />
Membership of Steering Group<br />
24%<br />
27%<br />
“They pushed it<br />
though from the<br />
top. I had<br />
virtually no<br />
involvement <strong>and</strong><br />
I headed the <strong>HR</strong><br />
function”.<br />
<strong>HR</strong> Director<br />
respondent<br />
88%<br />
Prof Whittington CEO/unit head<br />
93%
What’s the Effect of <strong>HR</strong> Involvement<br />
Improvements in performance with or without<br />
formal <strong>HR</strong> role<br />
Employee-related factors 28%<br />
41%<br />
Efficiency 50%<br />
59%<br />
Internal effectiveness 50%<br />
62%<br />
External effectiveness 53%<br />
61%<br />
No <strong>HR</strong><br />
<strong>HR</strong> on change team
Initial Findings: Is it working<br />
Aims<br />
CRITERIA Achieved<br />
24%<br />
70%<br />
1. External effectiveness eg<br />
59%<br />
improve service;<br />
34% 2. Internal effectiveness eg<br />
flexibility;<br />
59%<br />
3. Efficiency eg cost reduction;<br />
4. Employee effectiveness eg 39%<br />
retention morale<br />
• 40% are not completed on budget, 60% not on time.<br />
59%<br />
58%<br />
“The consequences of this<br />
change have knocked the<br />
organisation back by at least 2<br />
years”. CEO respondent<br />
“The deadline was very tight …<br />
decisions were pushed through<br />
without time to fine tune”. <strong>HR</strong><br />
respondent
Initial Findings: So what makes it<br />
work<br />
Use of project management methodologies<br />
Complementary <strong>HR</strong> changes<br />
Employee involvement<br />
<strong>HR</strong> function involvement
The Case<br />
“Our challenge is to create a better service <strong>and</strong> better working <br />
environment”. Jane Hutt, Welsh Health Minister<br />
“Because of its parallel antecedents, there is a powerful case<br />
to be made for involving <strong>HR</strong> expertise at the most senior<br />
levels of strategic <strong>and</strong> organisational change, from planning<br />
through to execution”. Richard Donkin, The Financial Times<br />
Efficiency<br />
Taylorism<br />
Work Study/Job Design<br />
BPR<br />
Welfare<br />
Cadburys, Boots etc<br />
Theory X <strong>and</strong> Y<br />
Wellness centres<br />
People as<br />
Assets
Research shows people management<br />
has a huge influence on organisation<br />
performance more generally.<br />
18%<br />
17% 17%<br />
16%<br />
Percentage 14%<br />
of variation in<br />
change in<br />
12%<br />
company 10%<br />
performance<br />
8%<br />
accounted for 8% 6%<br />
by 6%<br />
managerial<br />
practices 4%<br />
3%<br />
2%<br />
2% 1% 1% 1% 1%<br />
0%<br />
Profitability<br />
Productivity<br />
<strong>HR</strong>M Strategy Quality Technology R&D
The <strong>CIPD</strong>’s Future of Work research<br />
4000<br />
Profit per employee (£)<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0 to 4<br />
5 to 7<br />
8 to 10<br />
11+<br />
Number of <strong>HR</strong> practices<br />
Source: FoW (N=297)
The value of <strong>HR</strong> involvement in<br />
Restructuring<br />
<strong>HR</strong> Involvement by M & A phase<br />
70%<br />
86%<br />
97%<br />
49%<br />
62%<br />
71%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
Successful Mergers<br />
Unsuccessful Mergers<br />
Pre-deal Due Diligence Integration Planning Implementation
So why aren’t organisations more<br />
people oriented A Common<br />
Picture<br />
Business<br />
Strategy<br />
Organisation<br />
Restructuring<br />
Black Box<br />
<strong>HR</strong> Policies<br />
<strong>and</strong> Practices
The Dilemmas<br />
• Between what managers know <strong>and</strong> what they do:<br />
the knowing/doing gap.<br />
• Between <strong>HR</strong> strategies on paper <strong>and</strong> in practice:<br />
the implementation gap.<br />
• Between desired <strong>and</strong> actual <strong>HR</strong> roles.
The gaps: knowing/doing<br />
“Why does so much business research <strong>and</strong> education, so<br />
many books <strong>and</strong> articles, produce so little change in what<br />
managers actually do ….. so many managers know so many<br />
smart things about how to achieve high performance, yet do<br />
so many things to undermine it”.<br />
Jeffrey Pfeffer, Stanford<br />
“We need to turn the learning organisation into the doing<br />
organisation”.<br />
Howard Behr, President, Starbucks Corp.
The gaps: say/do<br />
<strong>HR</strong> administration<br />
4%<br />
46%<br />
Updating your own <strong>HR</strong> 9%<br />
knowledge<br />
14%<br />
Responding to line managers<br />
44%<br />
70%<br />
Providing specialist <strong>HR</strong> input to 47%<br />
wider business issues<br />
60%<br />
Developing <strong>HR</strong> strategy <strong>and</strong> 45%<br />
policy<br />
71%<br />
Implementing <strong>HR</strong> policies<br />
20%<br />
49%<br />
<strong>HR</strong> programme design<br />
Business strategy<br />
14%<br />
16%<br />
17%<br />
64%<br />
Most important<br />
Most time-consuming
The gap in strategic influence<br />
“Many of the <strong>HR</strong> managers were focused on operations<br />
<strong>and</strong> did not see strategic involvement in reorganisation<br />
as part of their domain … leaving <strong>HR</strong> to pick up the<br />
pieces <strong>and</strong> address the problem after the event ….<br />
“In the career ladder operational <strong>HR</strong> doesn’t seem to<br />
provide all the competencies required”.<br />
Prof. Richard Whittington
So the message is not getting across:<br />
‘Voices from the Boardroom’<br />
• 3 executives in 16 organisations;<br />
• 40% not aware of research findings: <br />
• Concerns:<br />
- how to implement progressive people management;<br />
- how much to do;<br />
- how to measure the outcomes;<br />
- “we spend a lot of dead money on training, rather<br />
than determining the real return on it”.
Moving to ‘real’ change <strong>and</strong> <strong>HR</strong><br />
strategies<br />
• Professionalising <strong>HR</strong> roles <strong>and</strong><br />
developing our skills;<br />
• Changing the concept of business<br />
change <strong>and</strong> <strong>HR</strong> strategy;<br />
• Changing the performance<br />
management model.
The Different Roles of <strong>HR</strong><br />
Business Partner<br />
Change Agent<br />
Employee Champion<br />
Administrative Expert<br />
• All roles are important;<br />
• A strategic role in addition to technical specialist<br />
<strong>and</strong> administration expert;<br />
• The change agent/process champion.
The New <strong>HR</strong> Function Model in One<br />
Major Multinational<br />
Board & Line <br />
Management<br />
<strong>HR</strong> Business <br />
Partners <br />
Processing <br />
Centres <br />
Centres of <br />
Excellence
<strong>HR</strong> is moving in a strategic direction <strong>and</strong> needs <br />
to go further<br />
Strategic<br />
O<br />
X<br />
Operational<br />
Proactive<br />
O<br />
X<br />
Reactive<br />
Tailored<br />
O<br />
X<br />
Off the<br />
shelf<br />
Business<br />
driven<br />
OX<br />
Employee<br />
driven<br />
Specialist<br />
O<br />
X<br />
Generalist<br />
X Current<br />
O Future
<strong>HR</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing its influence on<br />
change/OD<br />
45%<br />
36.1%<br />
40.5%<br />
43.5%<br />
38.8%<br />
28.9%<br />
27.3%<br />
15.7%<br />
16.6%<br />
19%<br />
8.4%<br />
2%<br />
organisation facilities internal health <strong>and</strong> corporate social other<br />
design management communication safety responsibility
<strong>HR</strong> staff skill needs<br />
Willingness to innovate 13%<br />
Integrity 25%<br />
Negotiating skills 11%<br />
Business knowledge 33%<br />
Ability to deliver target 40%<br />
Strategic thinking 46%<br />
Leadership ability 40%<br />
Empathy/Communication/listening<br />
skills<br />
24%<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>HR</strong> practices 26%<br />
Influencing/political skills 61%
The Changing Nature of Business, <strong>HR</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> Change Strategies<br />
From: “Planning the deployment of resources to<br />
achieve corporate goals”<br />
Ansoff<br />
“Corporate decisions of significance on the basis of<br />
economic rationality”<br />
Nathanson<br />
“The comm<strong>and</strong>er model”<br />
To: “A pattern in a stream of decisions”<br />
Brodwin<br />
Yves Doz<br />
“A process, a gestalt, introducing the appropraiate<br />
attitudes <strong>and</strong> behaviours to focus on strategic<br />
requirements”<br />
Miles <strong>and</strong> Snow<br />
“Strategy is our organisation <strong>and</strong> our<br />
people”<br />
Sir John Browne
Is Change Changing<br />
“Top down pragmatic change does not work ……… <br />
…. we need to recognise the complexity of change<br />
processes, set out a broad general direction with a<br />
small number of guiding rules.<br />
…. we need a more emergent approach with less<br />
centralisation <strong>and</strong> a focus on creating an<br />
environment to engage people<br />
…. effectiveness was found in long-term initiatives in<br />
an environment of continuous change”.<br />
Professor Malcolm Higgs, Henley
<strong>HR</strong> <strong>and</strong> Change Strategies: From Intent to Impact<br />
• 12 case studies – Tesco, Nationwide, Jaguar<br />
• 6 further public sector cases – Selly Park<br />
Tech, Inl<strong>and</strong> Revenue, West Mercia Police.<br />
• Major follow up study starting in the NHS;<br />
• Major follow up study underway with Cabinet<br />
Office <strong>and</strong> Employers Organisation;
Learning from the Research<br />
Unlocking the Black Box<br />
• Overall sense of purpose: ‘the big<br />
idea’<br />
• Front line leadership<br />
- translate goals into individual<br />
actions<br />
- extensive support <strong>and</strong> <br />
development<br />
• Focus on people<br />
- ability<br />
- motivation<br />
- opportunity<br />
Delivering Public Service<br />
• Energise<br />
- create an energising goal/purpose<br />
- lead by example – integrity, trust<br />
• Enable<br />
- strengthen leadership capability<br />
- the importance of the front line<br />
• Empower<br />
- forge teams to release energy<br />
- strong alignment <strong>HR</strong> policy <strong>and</strong><br />
reality<br />
- seize opportunity, adapt rapidly
The Real Relationships<br />
The ‘Big Idea’<br />
M<br />
A<br />
<strong>HR</strong><br />
Policies <strong>and</strong><br />
Practice<br />
PEOPLE<br />
Ability<br />
Motivation<br />
Opportunity<br />
N<br />
A<br />
G<br />
E<br />
M<br />
Commitment<br />
Satisfaction<br />
High<br />
Performance<br />
E<br />
N<br />
T
Successfully Achieving Change: An <br />
NHS Hospital<br />
• Bottom of the English league tables: senior management replaced.<br />
• New Ward Manager applies a range of <strong>HR</strong> practices:<br />
- appraisal; - training;<br />
-shifts;<br />
-briefings.<br />
“I’m much more motivated now, there’s training, the atmosphere’s<br />
totally different”.<br />
“Communication is excellent now … our manager is very approachable”.<br />
“When I came here it was very unsettled. Now we have a strong team …<br />
you want do the the job to the best of your ability”.
Changes in employee satisfaction in one<br />
hospital studied<br />
Job Influence<br />
45<br />
62<br />
Appraisa<br />
l<br />
55<br />
74<br />
Manager good at dealing<br />
with problems<br />
36<br />
49<br />
Respect shown by your<br />
line manager<br />
66<br />
89<br />
Motivation (% fee l 'very'<br />
or 'fairl y' motivated)<br />
79<br />
94<br />
Commitment (share the<br />
val ues)<br />
38<br />
57<br />
Year 1 Year 2
The <strong>HR</strong> <strong>and</strong> Change Strategy Process<br />
Where we are<br />
now<br />
Change Barriers<br />
Tradition<br />
Fear<br />
Cost<br />
Transition<br />
steps <strong>and</strong><br />
alternatives<br />
Where we need to<br />
be<br />
• Business<br />
• Organisation/<strong>HR</strong><br />
• <strong>HR</strong><br />
• Business<br />
• Organisation/<br />
<strong>HR</strong><br />
• <strong>HR</strong><br />
Change Drivers<br />
Change Drivers<br />
Change: Capacity<br />
Commitment<br />
Competence
Some simple things we can all do on<br />
the process<br />
• Involve line managers <strong>and</strong> employees on project groups;<br />
• Run focus groups early in any change exercise;<br />
• <strong>HR</strong>/line agreements;<br />
• Assess line managers skills/delivery;<br />
• Improve our own change/process skills<br />
• Train <strong>and</strong> coach managers;<br />
• Communicate the goals, not just the design details, of changes;<br />
• Run pilots;<br />
• Use technology to support, not replace other channels:<br />
• Regular opinion polling<br />
• Involve <strong>and</strong> communicate, communicate, communicate
The Performance <br />
Management Process<br />
• Part of the routine/embedding: “Quality is not just a statement, it’s all about<br />
our day-to-day processes <strong>and</strong> routines”.<br />
• Tailored <strong>and</strong> ‘borrowed’ scorecards:<br />
- Tesco steering wheel – Jaguar: Six Sigma – Court Service: EFQM.<br />
• Extensive reviews of employee attitudes.<br />
• Strong focus on development, competencies <strong>and</strong> two-way communication.<br />
• Strong teamworking component.<br />
• Not huge number of targets <strong>and</strong> close supervision.
Performance Reporting – a positive<br />
process<br />
Reporting<br />
human capital<br />
Developing<br />
credibility<br />
Generating<br />
information<br />
Measuring<br />
human capital<br />
Building<br />
knowledge<br />
Managing<br />
human capital
Conclusions: So what should I do <br />
now to change the <strong>HR</strong> agenda<br />
• Show evidence on people, performance <strong>and</strong> change to your board;<br />
• Measure the value added of <strong>HR</strong>;<br />
• Improving administration is key to closing the desired/actual gap;<br />
• Change your idea of <strong>HR</strong> <strong>and</strong> change strategies<br />
From<br />
Top down detailed plan; <br />
Boardroom; <br />
Design focus; <br />
Big bang change, perfection; <br />
Organisation as mechanism.<br />
To<br />
Mix of plan <strong>and</strong> action; <br />
Whole organisation; <br />
Process focus; <br />
Continuous improvement, evolution; <br />
Organisation as system/organism
Conclusions: So what should I do<br />
now (Contd)<br />
• Develop your process/change management/OD skills;<br />
• More from top management/planning to delivery/line focus.<br />
“Moving from strategy,<br />
structure <strong>and</strong> systems to<br />
purpose, people <strong>and</strong><br />
processes”. Sumantra<br />
Ghoshal<br />
“The Education Department<br />
seeks to promote happiness<br />
at work <strong>and</strong> through<br />
happiness, true efficiency”.<br />
Selfridges Archive, 1920
Changing the Reform Agenda<br />
Economy<br />
Efficiency<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Energising<br />
Enabling<br />
Empowering
“Save one life <strong>and</strong> you save a world …<br />
Change a life <strong>and</strong> you change the world”.<br />
Raoul Wallenberg<br />
d.brown@cipd.co.uk