19.01.2015 Views

HR and Reorganisation - CIPD

HR and Reorganisation - CIPD

HR and Reorganisation - CIPD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Managing Change in the Civil Service<br />

<strong>HR</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reorganisation</strong>:<br />

From Dilemmas to Delivery<br />

© Duncan Brown<br />

Assistant Director General<br />

15 July 2004


<strong>CIPD</strong> <strong>and</strong> Managing Change<br />

• The Psychological Contract<br />

• Organising for Success<br />

• People Management <strong>and</strong> Performance<br />

• From Research into Practice


The State of the Psychological <br />

Contract in the Public Sector<br />

• Declining levels of employee<br />

satisfaction <strong>and</strong> commitment;<br />

7.3<br />

Satisfaction with work<br />

7.2<br />

• Lowest sector ratings in central<br />

7.1<br />

government;<br />

7<br />

• Related to:<br />

- lower levels of trust;<br />

6.9<br />

6.8<br />

- less freedom/more controls; 6.7<br />

- more change;<br />

6.6<br />

- lower involvement.<br />

1998 2000 2001 2002<br />

Public Sector<br />

Private Sector


The <strong>CIPD</strong>’s Organising for Success <br />

Project<br />

• Objectives:<br />

- produce knowledge/tools to help <strong>HR</strong><br />

- thereby improve the success rates.<br />

• Method:<br />

- initial questionnaire survey<br />

- case studies in 12 organisations;<br />

- follow-up survey on key issues;<br />

- workshops groups;<br />

- publications <strong>and</strong> tools.


Organising for Success: Initial <br />

Findings<br />

• Lots of reorganisation <strong>and</strong> change;<br />

• Changes are shaped:<br />

- by prior experiences of<br />

executives (76%);<br />

- external learning (30%).<br />

• Causes in the wider environment:<br />

- merger/acquisition/Government: 53%<br />

- decline in performance: 53%<br />

- new CE: 50%<br />

- market/service changes: 48%<br />

“We are under<br />

pressure to<br />

increase<br />

efficiency…<br />

unfortunately our<br />

senior<br />

management<br />

equates that with<br />

shedding staff”.<br />

<strong>HR</strong> participant


What’s Involved<br />

• 85% make redundancies;<br />

• But two-thirds recruit;<br />

• 83% employees move to new jobs;<br />

• 44% extensive change in senior management positions;<br />

• 42% changes in organisational culture;<br />

• 25% extensive change in accounting <strong>and</strong> IT systems;<br />

• 26% other business processes.<br />

• Training<br />

In project<br />

management<br />

27%<br />

For employees<br />

affected<br />

52%


Who’s involved: Employees<br />

36%<br />

Employees<br />

part ici pated on<br />

design<br />

41%<br />

“Employees rarely have the<br />

opportunity to shape the<br />

development <strong>and</strong> management<br />

of reorganisations”.<br />

Survey Report<br />

82%<br />

Programme of<br />

c ommunicat ions<br />

“At the start of the process we had<br />

a staff side of 8. Now we have 40<br />

reps”<br />

Employer Representative<br />

82%<br />

“We didn’t involve the unions until<br />

all the decisions had been made<br />

…. there just wasn't time”<br />

<strong>HR</strong> Director


How Far is <strong>HR</strong> Involved<br />

“<strong>HR</strong> issues<br />

such as career<br />

<strong>and</strong> reward<br />

structures are<br />

relatively<br />

neglected in<br />

comparison, for<br />

example, with<br />

accounting <strong>and</strong><br />

IT changes …<br />

though involved<br />

<strong>HR</strong> people were<br />

generally not<br />

leading these<br />

programmes”.<br />

Internal OD<br />

External<br />

consultant<br />

<strong>HR</strong> specialist<br />

Membership of Steering Group<br />

24%<br />

27%<br />

“They pushed it<br />

though from the<br />

top. I had<br />

virtually no<br />

involvement <strong>and</strong><br />

I headed the <strong>HR</strong><br />

function”.<br />

<strong>HR</strong> Director<br />

respondent<br />

88%<br />

Prof Whittington CEO/unit head<br />

93%


What’s the Effect of <strong>HR</strong> Involvement<br />

Improvements in performance with or without<br />

formal <strong>HR</strong> role<br />

Employee-related factors 28%<br />

41%<br />

Efficiency 50%<br />

59%<br />

Internal effectiveness 50%<br />

62%<br />

External effectiveness 53%<br />

61%<br />

No <strong>HR</strong><br />

<strong>HR</strong> on change team


Initial Findings: Is it working<br />

Aims<br />

CRITERIA Achieved<br />

24%<br />

70%<br />

1. External effectiveness eg<br />

59%<br />

improve service;<br />

34% 2. Internal effectiveness eg<br />

flexibility;<br />

59%<br />

3. Efficiency eg cost reduction;<br />

4. Employee effectiveness eg 39%<br />

retention morale<br />

• 40% are not completed on budget, 60% not on time.<br />

59%<br />

58%<br />

“The consequences of this<br />

change have knocked the<br />

organisation back by at least 2<br />

years”. CEO respondent<br />

“The deadline was very tight …<br />

decisions were pushed through<br />

without time to fine tune”. <strong>HR</strong><br />

respondent


Initial Findings: So what makes it<br />

work<br />

Use of project management methodologies<br />

Complementary <strong>HR</strong> changes<br />

Employee involvement<br />

<strong>HR</strong> function involvement


The Case<br />

“Our challenge is to create a better service <strong>and</strong> better working <br />

environment”. Jane Hutt, Welsh Health Minister<br />

“Because of its parallel antecedents, there is a powerful case<br />

to be made for involving <strong>HR</strong> expertise at the most senior<br />

levels of strategic <strong>and</strong> organisational change, from planning<br />

through to execution”. Richard Donkin, The Financial Times<br />

Efficiency<br />

Taylorism<br />

Work Study/Job Design<br />

BPR<br />

Welfare<br />

Cadburys, Boots etc<br />

Theory X <strong>and</strong> Y<br />

Wellness centres<br />

People as<br />

Assets


Research shows people management<br />

has a huge influence on organisation<br />

performance more generally.<br />

18%<br />

17% 17%<br />

16%<br />

Percentage 14%<br />

of variation in<br />

change in<br />

12%<br />

company 10%<br />

performance<br />

8%<br />

accounted for 8% 6%<br />

by 6%<br />

managerial<br />

practices 4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

2% 1% 1% 1% 1%<br />

0%<br />

Profitability<br />

Productivity<br />

<strong>HR</strong>M Strategy Quality Technology R&D


The <strong>CIPD</strong>’s Future of Work research<br />

4000<br />

Profit per employee (£)<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0 to 4<br />

5 to 7<br />

8 to 10<br />

11+<br />

Number of <strong>HR</strong> practices<br />

Source: FoW (N=297)


The value of <strong>HR</strong> involvement in<br />

Restructuring<br />

<strong>HR</strong> Involvement by M & A phase<br />

70%<br />

86%<br />

97%<br />

49%<br />

62%<br />

71%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

Successful Mergers<br />

Unsuccessful Mergers<br />

Pre-deal Due Diligence Integration Planning Implementation


So why aren’t organisations more<br />

people oriented A Common<br />

Picture<br />

Business<br />

Strategy<br />

Organisation<br />

Restructuring<br />

Black Box<br />

<strong>HR</strong> Policies<br />

<strong>and</strong> Practices


The Dilemmas<br />

• Between what managers know <strong>and</strong> what they do:<br />

the knowing/doing gap.<br />

• Between <strong>HR</strong> strategies on paper <strong>and</strong> in practice:<br />

the implementation gap.<br />

• Between desired <strong>and</strong> actual <strong>HR</strong> roles.


The gaps: knowing/doing<br />

“Why does so much business research <strong>and</strong> education, so<br />

many books <strong>and</strong> articles, produce so little change in what<br />

managers actually do ….. so many managers know so many<br />

smart things about how to achieve high performance, yet do<br />

so many things to undermine it”.<br />

Jeffrey Pfeffer, Stanford<br />

“We need to turn the learning organisation into the doing<br />

organisation”.<br />

Howard Behr, President, Starbucks Corp.


The gaps: say/do<br />

<strong>HR</strong> administration<br />

4%<br />

46%<br />

Updating your own <strong>HR</strong> 9%<br />

knowledge<br />

14%<br />

Responding to line managers<br />

44%<br />

70%<br />

Providing specialist <strong>HR</strong> input to 47%<br />

wider business issues<br />

60%<br />

Developing <strong>HR</strong> strategy <strong>and</strong> 45%<br />

policy<br />

71%<br />

Implementing <strong>HR</strong> policies<br />

20%<br />

49%<br />

<strong>HR</strong> programme design<br />

Business strategy<br />

14%<br />

16%<br />

17%<br />

64%<br />

Most important<br />

Most time-consuming


The gap in strategic influence<br />

“Many of the <strong>HR</strong> managers were focused on operations<br />

<strong>and</strong> did not see strategic involvement in reorganisation<br />

as part of their domain … leaving <strong>HR</strong> to pick up the<br />

pieces <strong>and</strong> address the problem after the event ….<br />

“In the career ladder operational <strong>HR</strong> doesn’t seem to<br />

provide all the competencies required”.<br />

Prof. Richard Whittington


So the message is not getting across:<br />

‘Voices from the Boardroom’<br />

• 3 executives in 16 organisations;<br />

• 40% not aware of research findings: <br />

• Concerns:<br />

- how to implement progressive people management;<br />

- how much to do;<br />

- how to measure the outcomes;<br />

- “we spend a lot of dead money on training, rather<br />

than determining the real return on it”.


Moving to ‘real’ change <strong>and</strong> <strong>HR</strong><br />

strategies<br />

• Professionalising <strong>HR</strong> roles <strong>and</strong><br />

developing our skills;<br />

• Changing the concept of business<br />

change <strong>and</strong> <strong>HR</strong> strategy;<br />

• Changing the performance<br />

management model.


The Different Roles of <strong>HR</strong><br />

Business Partner<br />

Change Agent<br />

Employee Champion<br />

Administrative Expert<br />

• All roles are important;<br />

• A strategic role in addition to technical specialist<br />

<strong>and</strong> administration expert;<br />

• The change agent/process champion.


The New <strong>HR</strong> Function Model in One<br />

Major Multinational<br />

Board & Line <br />

Management<br />

<strong>HR</strong> Business <br />

Partners <br />

Processing <br />

Centres <br />

Centres of <br />

Excellence


<strong>HR</strong> is moving in a strategic direction <strong>and</strong> needs <br />

to go further<br />

Strategic<br />

O<br />

X<br />

Operational<br />

Proactive<br />

O<br />

X<br />

Reactive<br />

Tailored<br />

O<br />

X<br />

Off the<br />

shelf<br />

Business<br />

driven<br />

OX<br />

Employee<br />

driven<br />

Specialist<br />

O<br />

X<br />

Generalist<br />

X Current<br />

O Future


<strong>HR</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing its influence on<br />

change/OD<br />

45%<br />

36.1%<br />

40.5%<br />

43.5%<br />

38.8%<br />

28.9%<br />

27.3%<br />

15.7%<br />

16.6%<br />

19%<br />

8.4%<br />

2%<br />

organisation facilities internal health <strong>and</strong> corporate social other<br />

design management communication safety responsibility


<strong>HR</strong> staff skill needs<br />

Willingness to innovate 13%<br />

Integrity 25%<br />

Negotiating skills 11%<br />

Business knowledge 33%<br />

Ability to deliver target 40%<br />

Strategic thinking 46%<br />

Leadership ability 40%<br />

Empathy/Communication/listening<br />

skills<br />

24%<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>HR</strong> practices 26%<br />

Influencing/political skills 61%


The Changing Nature of Business, <strong>HR</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Change Strategies<br />

From: “Planning the deployment of resources to<br />

achieve corporate goals”<br />

Ansoff<br />

“Corporate decisions of significance on the basis of<br />

economic rationality”<br />

Nathanson<br />

“The comm<strong>and</strong>er model”<br />

To: “A pattern in a stream of decisions”<br />

Brodwin<br />

Yves Doz<br />

“A process, a gestalt, introducing the appropraiate<br />

attitudes <strong>and</strong> behaviours to focus on strategic<br />

requirements”<br />

Miles <strong>and</strong> Snow<br />

“Strategy is our organisation <strong>and</strong> our<br />

people”<br />

Sir John Browne


Is Change Changing<br />

“Top down pragmatic change does not work ……… <br />

…. we need to recognise the complexity of change<br />

processes, set out a broad general direction with a<br />

small number of guiding rules.<br />

…. we need a more emergent approach with less<br />

centralisation <strong>and</strong> a focus on creating an<br />

environment to engage people<br />

…. effectiveness was found in long-term initiatives in<br />

an environment of continuous change”.<br />

Professor Malcolm Higgs, Henley


<strong>HR</strong> <strong>and</strong> Change Strategies: From Intent to Impact<br />

• 12 case studies – Tesco, Nationwide, Jaguar<br />

• 6 further public sector cases – Selly Park<br />

Tech, Inl<strong>and</strong> Revenue, West Mercia Police.<br />

• Major follow up study starting in the NHS;<br />

• Major follow up study underway with Cabinet<br />

Office <strong>and</strong> Employers Organisation;


Learning from the Research<br />

Unlocking the Black Box<br />

• Overall sense of purpose: ‘the big<br />

idea’<br />

• Front line leadership<br />

- translate goals into individual<br />

actions<br />

- extensive support <strong>and</strong> <br />

development<br />

• Focus on people<br />

- ability<br />

- motivation<br />

- opportunity<br />

Delivering Public Service<br />

• Energise<br />

- create an energising goal/purpose<br />

- lead by example – integrity, trust<br />

• Enable<br />

- strengthen leadership capability<br />

- the importance of the front line<br />

• Empower<br />

- forge teams to release energy<br />

- strong alignment <strong>HR</strong> policy <strong>and</strong><br />

reality<br />

- seize opportunity, adapt rapidly


The Real Relationships<br />

The ‘Big Idea’<br />

M<br />

A<br />

<strong>HR</strong><br />

Policies <strong>and</strong><br />

Practice<br />

PEOPLE<br />

Ability<br />

Motivation<br />

Opportunity<br />

N<br />

A<br />

G<br />

E<br />

M<br />

Commitment<br />

Satisfaction<br />

High<br />

Performance<br />

E<br />

N<br />

T


Successfully Achieving Change: An <br />

NHS Hospital<br />

• Bottom of the English league tables: senior management replaced.<br />

• New Ward Manager applies a range of <strong>HR</strong> practices:<br />

- appraisal; - training;<br />

-shifts;<br />

-briefings.<br />

“I’m much more motivated now, there’s training, the atmosphere’s<br />

totally different”.<br />

“Communication is excellent now … our manager is very approachable”.<br />

“When I came here it was very unsettled. Now we have a strong team …<br />

you want do the the job to the best of your ability”.


Changes in employee satisfaction in one<br />

hospital studied<br />

Job Influence<br />

45<br />

62<br />

Appraisa<br />

l<br />

55<br />

74<br />

Manager good at dealing<br />

with problems<br />

36<br />

49<br />

Respect shown by your<br />

line manager<br />

66<br />

89<br />

Motivation (% fee l 'very'<br />

or 'fairl y' motivated)<br />

79<br />

94<br />

Commitment (share the<br />

val ues)<br />

38<br />

57<br />

Year 1 Year 2


The <strong>HR</strong> <strong>and</strong> Change Strategy Process<br />

Where we are<br />

now<br />

Change Barriers<br />

Tradition<br />

Fear<br />

Cost<br />

Transition<br />

steps <strong>and</strong><br />

alternatives<br />

Where we need to<br />

be<br />

• Business<br />

• Organisation/<strong>HR</strong><br />

• <strong>HR</strong><br />

• Business<br />

• Organisation/<br />

<strong>HR</strong><br />

• <strong>HR</strong><br />

Change Drivers<br />

Change Drivers<br />

Change: Capacity<br />

Commitment<br />

Competence


Some simple things we can all do on<br />

the process<br />

• Involve line managers <strong>and</strong> employees on project groups;<br />

• Run focus groups early in any change exercise;<br />

• <strong>HR</strong>/line agreements;<br />

• Assess line managers skills/delivery;<br />

• Improve our own change/process skills<br />

• Train <strong>and</strong> coach managers;<br />

• Communicate the goals, not just the design details, of changes;<br />

• Run pilots;<br />

• Use technology to support, not replace other channels:<br />

• Regular opinion polling<br />

• Involve <strong>and</strong> communicate, communicate, communicate


The Performance <br />

Management Process<br />

• Part of the routine/embedding: “Quality is not just a statement, it’s all about<br />

our day-to-day processes <strong>and</strong> routines”.<br />

• Tailored <strong>and</strong> ‘borrowed’ scorecards:<br />

- Tesco steering wheel – Jaguar: Six Sigma – Court Service: EFQM.<br />

• Extensive reviews of employee attitudes.<br />

• Strong focus on development, competencies <strong>and</strong> two-way communication.<br />

• Strong teamworking component.<br />

• Not huge number of targets <strong>and</strong> close supervision.


Performance Reporting – a positive<br />

process<br />

Reporting<br />

human capital<br />

Developing<br />

credibility<br />

Generating<br />

information<br />

Measuring<br />

human capital<br />

Building<br />

knowledge<br />

Managing<br />

human capital


Conclusions: So what should I do <br />

now to change the <strong>HR</strong> agenda<br />

• Show evidence on people, performance <strong>and</strong> change to your board;<br />

• Measure the value added of <strong>HR</strong>;<br />

• Improving administration is key to closing the desired/actual gap;<br />

• Change your idea of <strong>HR</strong> <strong>and</strong> change strategies<br />

From<br />

Top down detailed plan; <br />

Boardroom; <br />

Design focus; <br />

Big bang change, perfection; <br />

Organisation as mechanism.<br />

To<br />

Mix of plan <strong>and</strong> action; <br />

Whole organisation; <br />

Process focus; <br />

Continuous improvement, evolution; <br />

Organisation as system/organism


Conclusions: So what should I do<br />

now (Contd)<br />

• Develop your process/change management/OD skills;<br />

• More from top management/planning to delivery/line focus.<br />

“Moving from strategy,<br />

structure <strong>and</strong> systems to<br />

purpose, people <strong>and</strong><br />

processes”. Sumantra<br />

Ghoshal<br />

“The Education Department<br />

seeks to promote happiness<br />

at work <strong>and</strong> through<br />

happiness, true efficiency”.<br />

Selfridges Archive, 1920


Changing the Reform Agenda<br />

Economy<br />

Efficiency<br />

Effectiveness<br />

Energising<br />

Enabling<br />

Empowering


“Save one life <strong>and</strong> you save a world …<br />

Change a life <strong>and</strong> you change the world”.<br />

Raoul Wallenberg<br />

d.brown@cipd.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!