20.01.2015 Views

brst symmetry in cohomological hamiltonian mechanics - Institute for ...

brst symmetry in cohomological hamiltonian mechanics - Institute for ...

brst symmetry in cohomological hamiltonian mechanics - Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Note that <strong>in</strong> the limit β → 0, we recover the classical Po<strong>in</strong>care <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />

<strong>in</strong>variants K p , p = 1, . . . n, as the solutions of Hρ = 0. They are fundamental<br />

BRST <strong>in</strong>variant observables of the theory, {Q, K p } = 0, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> the untwist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

limit, β → 0, the super<strong>symmetry</strong> generators Q β and ¯Q β become the<br />

BRST and anti-BRST generators, respectively. Geometrically, this follows<br />

from dK p = 0 s<strong>in</strong>ce K p = ω p and dω = 0. Similarly, ¯Kp ’s are anti-BRST<br />

<strong>in</strong>variant observables.<br />

Also, it should be noted that there seems to be no relation of the supersymmetric<br />

Hamilton function H to the Morse theory[13] due to the generic<br />

absence of terms quadratic <strong>in</strong> h i . The reason is that the symplectic two<strong>for</strong>m<br />

ω is closed so that this does not allow one to construct, or obta<strong>in</strong> by<br />

the BRST gauge fix<strong>in</strong>g procedure, non-vanish<strong>in</strong>g terms quadratic <strong>in</strong> fields,<br />

except <strong>for</strong> the ghost-antighost. On the other hand, such terms, which are<br />

natural <strong>in</strong> (<strong>cohomological</strong>) quantum field theories, would produce stochastic<br />

contribution (Gaussian noise) to the equations of motion[19] that would,<br />

clearly, spoil the determ<strong>in</strong>istic character of the Hamiltonian <strong>mechanics</strong>.<br />

3 Correlation functions<br />

Let us now turn to consideration of the correlation functions of the BRST<br />

observables. The BRST <strong>in</strong>variant observables of <strong>in</strong>terest are of the <strong>for</strong>m<br />

O A = A i1···i p<br />

(a)c i1 · · · c ip , which are p-<strong>for</strong>ms on M 2n , A ∈ Λ p . One can easily<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d that {Q, O A } = 0 if and only if A is closed s<strong>in</strong>ce {Q, O A } = O dA .<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, the BRST observables correspond to the de Rham cohomology.<br />

The basic field a i (t) is characterized by homotopy classes of the map<br />

M 1 → M 2n . Clearly, they are classes of conjugated elements of the fundamental<br />

homotopy group π 1 (M 2n ), <strong>in</strong> our one-dimensional field theory, s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

closed paths make M 1 = S 1 (M 1 = R 1 is homotopically trivial). Hence, we<br />

should study (quasi-)periodical trajectories <strong>in</strong> M 2n characterized by a period<br />

τ, t ∈ S 1 . This case is of much importance <strong>in</strong> a general framework s<strong>in</strong>ce it<br />

allows one to relate the correlation functions to the Lyapunov exponents[20],<br />

positive values of which are well known to be a strong <strong>in</strong>dication of chaos <strong>in</strong><br />

Hamiltonian systems, and to the Kolmogorov-S<strong>in</strong>ai entropy.<br />

If N is a closed submanifold of (compact) M 2n represent<strong>in</strong>g some homology<br />

class of codimension m (2n-m cycle), then, by Po<strong>in</strong>care duality, we have<br />

m-dimensional cohomology class A (m-cocycle), which can be taken to have<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!