Career Management and Development November 2005 - CIPD
Career Management and Development November 2005 - CIPD
Career Management and Development November 2005 - CIPD
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chartered Institute of Personnel <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />
Professional <strong>Development</strong> Scheme<br />
Specialist Personnel <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />
<strong>Career</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Development</strong><br />
<strong>November</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />
10 <strong>November</strong> 13:50-16:00hrs<br />
<strong>2005</strong><br />
Time allowed - Two hours <strong>and</strong> ten minutes (including ten minutes’<br />
reading time).<br />
Answer Section A <strong>and</strong> seven of the ten questions in Section B.<br />
Please write clearly <strong>and</strong> legibly.<br />
Questions may be answered in any order.<br />
Equal marks are allocated to each section of the paper.<br />
Within Section B equal marks are allocated to each question.<br />
If a question includes reference to ‘your organisation’, this may be<br />
interpreted as covering any organisation with which you are<br />
familiar.<br />
The case study is not based on an actual company. Any<br />
similarities to known organisations are accidental.<br />
You will fail the examination if:<br />
• you fail to answer seven questions in Section B <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
Registered charity no: 1079797<br />
5719
CAREER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT<br />
NOVEMBER <strong>2005</strong><br />
• you achieve less than 40 per cent in any section.<br />
SECTION A – Case Study<br />
Note: It is permissible to make assumptions by adding to the case study details<br />
given below provided the essence of the case study is neither changed nor<br />
undermined in any way by what is added.<br />
Following a Business Strategy Review <strong>and</strong> the £35 million acquisition of a leading<br />
web design <strong>and</strong> build company, Matador plc has created a new £400 million UK<br />
business called Home Access. The services offered by Home Access cover three<br />
main business areas <strong>and</strong> incorporate established business units.<br />
The three main areas are: Solutions Design - the development of websites, online <strong>and</strong><br />
printed catalogues <strong>and</strong> the marketing of br<strong>and</strong>s over the Internet; Customer Value<br />
Creation - the resources <strong>and</strong> systems needed to manage customer service i.e.<br />
management of databases, credit management, account processing <strong>and</strong> customer<br />
contact centres <strong>and</strong> Logistics - process management from order processing <strong>and</strong><br />
warehousing to delivery of goods to the customer.<br />
The company wishes to create a new <strong>Career</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Strategy that reflects the<br />
modern, optimistic <strong>and</strong> positive culture of the new venture <strong>and</strong> that adopts a<br />
partnership approach. Throughout the recent changes the Corporate<br />
Communications Unit has emphasised the ‘importance of our people’. However the<br />
restructuring of the organisation following the acquisition has naturally meant<br />
redundancies, <strong>and</strong> changes that have caused anxieties amongst many employees<br />
<strong>and</strong> these have not been addressed.<br />
The total number of employees is 2000, of whom 35 per cent are call centre advisers<br />
who have direct contact with the customer, 35 per cent are involved in warehousing<br />
<strong>and</strong> home delivery <strong>and</strong> 20 per cent in the development of Internet activities. The<br />
remaining 10 per cent are involved in sundry roles. The highest turnover is in the call<br />
centres with 30 per cent leaving last year.<br />
Currently appraisals are linked to Annual Pay Reviews <strong>and</strong> have been seen as a<br />
matter of ‘do I get a rise or not’ Most managers simply either put forward their<br />
employees for a grade rise, or exclude them on the basis of poor performance. The<br />
system has not been consistent across the organisation.<br />
The organisation has changed from a traditional hierarchical structure to one that has<br />
more project development teams <strong>and</strong> less clearly defined roles. This has meant<br />
fewer promotion opportunities <strong>and</strong> less employment security <strong>and</strong> the company needs<br />
to compensate for this in order to improve motivation <strong>and</strong> commitment.<br />
There is a Planning <strong>and</strong> Resource Team that is responsible for succession <strong>and</strong><br />
replacement planning at the ten call centres. They collate statistics supplied to them<br />
by managers, <strong>and</strong> issue recruitment plans. Managers are sometimes unaware of the<br />
implication of the figures they submit <strong>and</strong> often delegate the job. Smaller departments<br />
such as Payroll <strong>and</strong> Finance have no succession planning <strong>and</strong> managers have little<br />
5719
or no training in this area.<br />
CAREER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT<br />
NOVEMBER <strong>2005</strong><br />
5719
CAREER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT<br />
NOVEMBER <strong>2005</strong><br />
Assessment Centres are used on an ad-hoc basis, when <strong>and</strong> where the need arises.<br />
Call centre advisers who show potential are encouraged to attend in order to decide if<br />
they are ‘team manager material’. In the call centre environment the ultimate goal is<br />
to become a team manager <strong>and</strong> all team managers used to be customer advisers.<br />
Those who are successful at the assessment centre may be used for st<strong>and</strong>-in <strong>and</strong><br />
designate positions <strong>and</strong> performance at these times will be considered for applicants<br />
for a team manager’s job.<br />
Redundancy outplacement workshops have been hard to organise across the<br />
company, with a minimum of ten people being required to make it viable <strong>and</strong> a<br />
shortage of staff trained to run them.<br />
You are the newly appointed <strong>Career</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Manager <strong>and</strong> have been<br />
asked to produce a career development strategy with a specific focus on the<br />
call centres. Drawing upon contemporary research:<br />
1. Produce a report to the HR Director that indicates the general<br />
career management <strong>and</strong> development issues facing the merged<br />
organisation.<br />
2. Describe, justify <strong>and</strong> prioritise the key elements of your proposed<br />
career development strategy for the call centres.<br />
You should spend equal amounts of time on tasks (1) <strong>and</strong> (2).<br />
PLEASE TURN OVER<br />
5719
CAREER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT<br />
NOVEMBER <strong>2005</strong><br />
SECTION B<br />
Answer SEVEN of the ten questions in this section. To communicate your<br />
answer more clearly, you may use whatever methods you wish, for example<br />
diagrams, flow charts, bullet points, as long as you provide explanations with<br />
these.<br />
1. Evaluate the significance for career management in your organisation of<br />
one governmental initiative in the field of vocational education <strong>and</strong> training.<br />
2. Drawing upon research findings, how might you use past assessment of<br />
an individual’s strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses to help clarify their future<br />
development<br />
3. Assess the use your organisation can make of local colleges to foster the<br />
career development of staff.<br />
4. Drawing upon research findings <strong>and</strong> evidence from good practice, explain<br />
the major factors that lead to personal development plans, drawn up at<br />
development centres, not being implemented. How could implementation<br />
rates be improved<br />
5. How might a 21 year old individual who has just left university set about<br />
self-assessing their motivation/aptitude/aspiration for a given career route<br />
What degree of reliance can a career adviser place on the assessment<br />
outcome<br />
6. Drawing on examples from your own organisation, explain the ways in<br />
which individuals can acquire transferable skills.<br />
7. Prepare a briefing note for the senior management team that summarises<br />
the benefits for the employee <strong>and</strong> employer of holding drop-in lunch break<br />
career action workshops.<br />
8. How would you distinguish between differential <strong>and</strong> developmental theories<br />
of occupational choice What are the practical implications of this<br />
distinction<br />
9. Explain to a group of undergraduate business students how ethical<br />
principles found in professional codes of practice have impacted upon the<br />
work of career’s guidance practitioners.<br />
5719
CAREER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT<br />
NOVEMBER <strong>2005</strong><br />
10. A friend has stated that a recent in-house survey in her organisation has<br />
revealed that most of the secretaries there have expressed no interest<br />
whatsoever in career development initiatives. She has asked you for any<br />
suggestions you might have to change their mindset. What advice would<br />
you give<br />
END OF EXAMINATION<br />
5719
PDS – <strong>Career</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />
EXAMINER'S REPORT<br />
<strong>November</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
There were six c<strong>and</strong>idates for this diet, all of them coming from the single centre that<br />
submitted c<strong>and</strong>idates for the May examination. The overall pass rate was 50%,<br />
broken down as follows.<br />
<strong>November</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />
Grade<br />
Number of<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idates<br />
Distinction 0 0<br />
Merit 0 0<br />
Pass 3 50<br />
Marginal Fail 0 0<br />
Fail 3 50<br />
Total 6 100<br />
Percentage of<br />
total<br />
The results were disappointing. This was the lowest pass rate yet for this subject, <strong>and</strong><br />
there were no Merits or Distinctions. More significantly, there was virtually no attempt<br />
made by c<strong>and</strong>idates to draw upon published sources, be they research- based or<br />
more general, either for Section A or B.<br />
The failures all arose from c<strong>and</strong>idates’ difficulties with Section B, where each<br />
question focuses on a specific part of the syllabus, as opposed to the more general<br />
coverage in Section A. The inference shouldn’t be drawn from this that Section B<br />
questions are harder than Section A questions. It draws attention to how important it<br />
is for c<strong>and</strong>idates to prepare themselves across the whole range. For this small group<br />
there was a general lack of theoretical underpinning in their answers.<br />
Section A<br />
The scenario takes two increasingly familiar situations – that of mergers <strong>and</strong> call<br />
centre operations – <strong>and</strong> asks career management <strong>and</strong> development specialists to<br />
evaluate these from their professional perspective. It particularly focuses on those<br />
aspects of the syllabus that deal with the organisational management of careers in<br />
such a setting. All c<strong>and</strong>idates achieved the 50% threshold, with a spread of marks<br />
from 50–61%.<br />
Question 1<br />
This should have proved to be a very rich scenario for prepared c<strong>and</strong>idates, enabling<br />
them to apply their knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing to various groupings within the<br />
organisation, operating on different sites, <strong>and</strong> with fundamentally different roles, <strong>and</strong><br />
confronting merger issues. There is additionally an array of research – including<br />
research from the <strong>CIPD</strong> – dealing with problems associated with perceived changes<br />
to the psychological contract <strong>and</strong> perceived barriers to career development. On the<br />
whole, c<strong>and</strong>idates dealt satisfactorily with the question at a pragmatic diagnostic level.<br />
Very few theoretical references emerged however. One c<strong>and</strong>idate effectively drew<br />
upon Baruch <strong>and</strong> Herriot <strong>and</strong> Pemberton, but this was an exception.
PDS – <strong>Career</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />
EXAMINER'S REPORT<br />
<strong>November</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />
Question 2<br />
Various possibilities present themselves here as in all questions, asking c<strong>and</strong>idates to<br />
develop strategic options <strong>and</strong> priorities. But the answers should have at least made<br />
reference to a) generic debates in the literature as to the level of stress or otherwise<br />
in call centres, <strong>and</strong> b) concerns relating to outsourcing <strong>and</strong> offshoring of such<br />
activities. The issues of isolation, stress <strong>and</strong> narrowness of career development<br />
opportunities for call centre staff – often predominantly women – <strong>and</strong> how these might<br />
be h<strong>and</strong>led have also emerged in a number of studies. C<strong>and</strong>idates were however,<br />
almost to a person, totally silent on any of these points, which contributed to a set of<br />
weak answers to this question.<br />
Section B<br />
Question 1<br />
Prepared c<strong>and</strong>idates should have found this to be a straightforward evaluation<br />
question relating practices in their organisation to a mainstream syllabus area. There<br />
are of course a number of governmental initiatives that they could have chosen from.<br />
Surprisingly, only 50% of c<strong>and</strong>idates chose this question, two with bare pass answers<br />
<strong>and</strong> one who did not reach the threshold.<br />
Question 2<br />
This is another mainstream syllabus area. There is much in the general literature on<br />
appraisal that reports studies addressing the issue of assessing strengths <strong>and</strong><br />
weaknesses as a basis for making judgments about future potential. Four out of the<br />
six c<strong>and</strong>idates attempted this question, none of them reaching the threshold.<br />
Question 3<br />
The syllabus clearly covers use of local colleges. The question addresses<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idates’ underst<strong>and</strong>ing of their organisational reality <strong>and</strong> their ability to address<br />
issues emerging – answers would, of course, depend upon the size of the<br />
organisation. All c<strong>and</strong>idates attempted this question, 50% of whom achieved the pass<br />
threshold.<br />
Question 4<br />
This question tests both theoretical <strong>and</strong> practical awareness of a well-known<br />
phenomenon. Two out of the five who attempted it achieved a merit-level mark. The<br />
remaining three were below 50%.<br />
Question 5<br />
Self-assessment of motivation <strong>and</strong> aptitudes for career routes is a mainstream
PDS – <strong>Career</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />
EXAMINER'S REPORT<br />
<strong>November</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />
syllabus area, as are the issues emerging. Prepared c<strong>and</strong>idates should be familiar<br />
with these, <strong>and</strong> with the theoretical backcloth surrounding self-assessment, including<br />
concepts such as self-efficacy. Four c<strong>and</strong>idates attempted it, only two of whom<br />
achieved a pass level, <strong>and</strong> in both cases the mark was marginal. No significant theory<br />
underpinned any of the answers.<br />
Question 6<br />
Again, this should have proved to be a straightforward question for a prepared<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idate, drawing upon a mainstream syllabus area. Much has been written on the<br />
subject of transferable skills both in general career management <strong>and</strong> development<br />
textbooks, governmental reports <strong>and</strong> specialist journals. Each c<strong>and</strong>idate had a go at<br />
this question <strong>and</strong> four out of the six achieved a pass-level mark.<br />
Question 7<br />
There are a number of sources that discuss the value of career action workshops.<br />
C<strong>and</strong>idates were expected of course to contextualise these to their own<br />
organisational reality. This was the best answered of all of the questions, with all but<br />
one of the c<strong>and</strong>idates attempting it achieving a pass level.<br />
Question 8<br />
Not a single c<strong>and</strong>idate attempted this question, despite the fact that both differential<br />
<strong>and</strong> developmental theories of occupational choice are specifically referred to in the<br />
<strong>CIPD</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards for this subject. The concepts are very simple – differential theories<br />
are based on such things as gender <strong>and</strong> class differences, <strong>and</strong> developmental<br />
theories are based on such issues as predetermined life stages/cycles.<br />
Question 9<br />
Two c<strong>and</strong>idates attempted this question, neither reaching the pass threshold. I was<br />
surprised at this given the current emphases on ethical principles <strong>and</strong> codes of<br />
practice.<br />
Question 10<br />
As a career development officer it is an essential skill to know how to give advice. All<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idates attempted this question relating to career development opportunities for<br />
secretaries <strong>and</strong> 50% of them gave advice in their answers that took them over the<br />
pass threshold.<br />
John Walton<br />
Examiner
PDS – <strong>Career</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />
EXAMINER'S REPORT<br />
<strong>November</strong> <strong>2005</strong>