20.01.2015 Views

Phytochemical Screening & Antibacterial activity of aqueous ... - IJGHC

Phytochemical Screening & Antibacterial activity of aqueous ... - IJGHC

Phytochemical Screening & Antibacterial activity of aqueous ... - IJGHC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E-ISSN: 2278-3229<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Green and Herbal Chemistry<br />

Available online at www.ijghc.org<br />

Green Chemistry<br />

<strong>IJGHC</strong>; September-November, 2012; Vol.1.No.3, 211-216<br />

Research Article<br />

<strong>Phytochemical</strong> <strong>Screening</strong> & <strong>Antibacterial</strong> <strong>activity</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>aqueous</strong> & methanolic extract <strong>of</strong> Young & Mature<br />

leaves <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava L. (guava)<br />

Meenakshi Vaidya<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Botany, Mithibai College, Vile Parle (West), Mumbai 400 056.<br />

Received: 18 August 2012; Revised: 31 August 2012; Accepted: 11 September 2012.<br />

Abstract: Psidium guajava commonly called as guava belongs to family<br />

Myrtaceae. The leaf & the bark have lot <strong>of</strong> medicinal properties. Guava leaves<br />

especially have been a subject for diverse research in terms <strong>of</strong> pharmacological<br />

properties & its history in folk medicine. The leaves have been used in folk<br />

medicine as remedy for diarrhea & also for its antimicrobial properties. In the<br />

present study a comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>aqueous</strong> & methanolic extracts was done<br />

for both young & mature leaves. <strong>Phytochemical</strong> screening was carried out by<br />

standard biochemical tests, and to evaluate the possibility <strong>of</strong> novel<br />

pharmaceuticals having antimicrobial potential. The study revealed the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites like alkaloids, anthocyanins, carotenoids, essential oils,<br />

fatty acids, lectins, phenols, saponins, tannins etc. The microbial assay was done<br />

by agar cup method & MIC against the following microorganism-<br />

Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis.<br />

Keywords: Psidium guajava, young & mature, Biochemical, antibacterial,<br />

MIC.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Plants are reservoirs with healing powers. A renewed interest in screening <strong>of</strong> plants for biologically active<br />

compounds, particularly the ones which effectively intervene the human ailments. Even tens <strong>of</strong> thousands<br />

<strong>of</strong> antimicrobial compounds exist, the ability <strong>of</strong> microbes to develop resistance to even the most powerful<br />

antimicrobial compounds is amazingly rapid 1 .The most popular and attractive hypothesis is that vegetable<br />

and fruits contain bioactive compounds that have a protective effect. Plant based extracts can be extracted<br />

211 <strong>IJGHC</strong>; 2012, Vol.1, No.3, 211-216.


<strong>Phytochemical</strong>...<br />

Meenakshi Vaidya<br />

from any part <strong>of</strong> plant like seeds, roots, leaves, barks, fruits etc. One <strong>of</strong> such plant used traditionally is<br />

Psidium guajava Linn.<br />

Psidium guajava Linn. is also known as guava , belongs to the family Myrtaceae which is widely<br />

distributed in tropical and warm temperature regions <strong>of</strong> the world 2 . P. guajava contains a number <strong>of</strong><br />

phyto-constituents like tannins, essential oil, flavonoids, saponins, lectins, vitamins, fiber, fatty acids,<br />

alanine, oxalic acid, palmitic acid, quercetin, glutamic acid, d- galactose and histedine 3-10 The present<br />

work was carried out for phytochemical screening by following standard procedures and also finds out<br />

possible antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>of</strong> different maturity i.e. Young and mature with respect to<br />

methanolic and <strong>aqueous</strong> extracts with reference to Gram-positive bacterial strains using the agar cup<br />

diffusion method, MIC & to correlate the <strong>activity</strong> with the plant constituents present.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The plant material for the current studies was collected from the campus <strong>of</strong> VIVA College, Virar (W) and<br />

which was authenticated (No. 105908).The plant material was washed, dried at 40 o C in oven for a period<br />

<strong>of</strong> seven days and then powdered.<br />

Preparation Of Extracts<br />

For Methanolic Extract: Ten grams <strong>of</strong> dried powdered material was first defatted with petroleum ether<br />

(60-80 o C) in Soxhlet apparatus for 2hr. It was then extracted with methanol for 6 h. the extract was<br />

filtered and the solvent was evaporated and reconstituted with DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) for further use.<br />

For Aqueous Extract: Water extract was prepared by adding ten grams <strong>of</strong> powdered plant material with<br />

distilled water in a beaker on water bath with constant stirring, filtered, concentrated.<br />

Test Organism: Staphylococcus aureus (NCIM 2654), Bacillus subtilis (NCIM 2195) were used to check<br />

for antimicrobial <strong>activity</strong>. The test organisms were sourced from NCIM, Pune.<br />

PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING<br />

The extracts were used for determination <strong>of</strong> phytoconstituents like alkaloids, anthocyanins, carotenoids,<br />

essential oils, fatty acids, lectins, phenols, saponins, tannins etc.<br />

Testing For <strong>Antibacterial</strong> Activity: The agar cup diffusion method was used to check the antibacterial<br />

<strong>activity</strong> <strong>of</strong> the extract. 0.2mL <strong>of</strong> standardized bacterial stock suspensions (10 8 - 10 9) colony forming units<br />

per mL was mixed with 20mL <strong>of</strong> sterile Mueller Hinton agar. The bulk seeded medium was poured into<br />

sterile Petri dishes and was left to set. For each testing organism three such plates were prepared and in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> these plates 4 cups, 8 mm in diameter were cut using a sterile cork borer and the agar discs were<br />

removed. The cups were then filled with 40 µL extract <strong>of</strong> different concentrations. Three replicates were<br />

carried out for each concentration <strong>of</strong> extract against each test organism, simultaneously addition <strong>of</strong><br />

methanol & DMSO instead <strong>of</strong> extract were carried out as controls. The plates were then incubated at 37 o C<br />

for 24 hr in upright position. After incubation, the diameters <strong>of</strong> the results and growth inhibition zones<br />

were measured, averaged and the mean values were tabulated.<br />

MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION (MIC)<br />

The tube dilution method was used for determination <strong>of</strong> minimum inhibitory concentration. The extract<br />

was serially diluted to give different concentration range (based on results obtained for AST for each test<br />

organism). A set <strong>of</strong> 9 sterile test tubes containing 5 mL <strong>of</strong> sterile nutrient broth was prepared, 6 such tubes<br />

were inoculated with 100 µL <strong>of</strong> bacterial culture suspension and 1 mL <strong>of</strong> plant extract and remaining two<br />

tubes were inoculated with 100 µL <strong>of</strong> bacterial culture, one containing 1 mL <strong>of</strong> DMSO & the other<br />

containing Methanol. The last tube containing only sterile nutrient broth was used as negative control. The<br />

inoculated tubes were then incubated at 37 o C for 24 hrs (for bacterial cultures) and 25 o C for 2 days (for<br />

212 <strong>IJGHC</strong>; 2012, Vol.1, No.3, 211-216


<strong>Phytochemical</strong>...<br />

Meenakshi Vaidya<br />

fungal culture). After incubation, the tubes were screened for detecting the growth which were compared<br />

against negative control. The tube which did not show any growth was taken as MIC <strong>of</strong> the extract.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

<strong>Phytochemical</strong> <strong>Screening</strong><br />

Phytoconstituent<br />

Result<br />

Tannins +<br />

Alkaloids +<br />

Flavonoids +<br />

Saponins +<br />

Essential oil +<br />

Fatty acids +<br />

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST): methanolic & <strong>aqueous</strong> extract <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava showed<br />

antibacterial effect on both the organisms.<br />

Table-1. <strong>Antibacterial</strong> <strong>activity</strong> <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava leaf extracts<br />

1.1 Methanolic extract <strong>of</strong> young leaves<br />

Microorganisms<br />

Staphylococcus<br />

aureus<br />

Methanolic extracts <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava(%)<br />

Mean inhibition zones (mm)<br />

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 DMSO Methanol<br />

19<br />

1<br />

7<br />

16 15 15 15 14 14 13 12 - -<br />

Bacillus subtilis 13<br />

1<br />

2<br />

12 11 - - - - - - - -<br />

1.2 Methanolic Extract <strong>of</strong> Mature leaves<br />

Microorganisms<br />

Staphylococcus<br />

aureus<br />

Bacillus subtilis<br />

Methanolic extracts <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava(%)<br />

Mean inhibition zones (mm)<br />

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 DMSO Methanol<br />

17 16 16 15 15 14 14 13 13 13 - -<br />

14 13 13 12 12 11 - - - - - -<br />

213 <strong>IJGHC</strong>; 2012, Vol.1, No.3, 211-216


<strong>Phytochemical</strong>...<br />

Meenakshi Vaidya<br />

1.3 Aqueous Extract <strong>of</strong> Young Leaves<br />

Microorganisms<br />

Staphylococcus<br />

aureus<br />

Bacillus subtilis<br />

Methanolic extracts <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava (%)<br />

Mean inhibition zones (mm)<br />

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 DMSO Methanol<br />

13 13 12 12 11 11 - - - - - -<br />

13 12 12 11 - - - - - - - -<br />

1.4 Aqueous Extract <strong>of</strong> Mature leaves<br />

Microorganisms<br />

Staphylococcus<br />

aureus<br />

Bacillus subtilis<br />

Methanolic extracts <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava(%)<br />

Mean inhibition zones (mm)<br />

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 DMSO Methanol<br />

14 14 13 13 12 12 11 11 - - - -<br />

13 12 12 11 - - - - - - - -<br />

‘-‘Indicates no inhibition (resistant to extract)<br />

Table-2.1 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Young leaves)<br />

Methanolic extracts (%)<br />

Microorganism 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 - DMSO Methanol -ve<br />

Staphylococcus<br />

aureus<br />

- - + + + + +<br />

-<br />

Microorganism 7 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 DMSO Methanol -ve<br />

Bacillus subtilis - + + + + + + +<br />

-<br />

Table-2.2 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Mature leaves)<br />

Methanolic extracts (%)<br />

Microorganism 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 - DMSO Methanol -ve<br />

Staphylococcus<br />

aureus<br />

- - - + + + +<br />

-<br />

Microorganism 5 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 DMSO Methanol -ve<br />

Bacillus subtilis<br />

- - + + + + + +<br />

-<br />

214 <strong>IJGHC</strong>; 2012, Vol.1, No.3, 211-216


<strong>Phytochemical</strong>...<br />

Meenakshi Vaidya<br />

Table-2.3 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Mature leaves)<br />

Aqueous extracts (%)<br />

Microorganism 5 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 DMSO Methanol -ve<br />

Staphylococcus<br />

-<br />

- - - + + + + +<br />

aureus<br />

Microorganism 7 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 DMSO Methanol -ve<br />

Bacillus subtilis<br />

- - + + + + + +<br />

-<br />

Table-2.4 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Mature leaves)<br />

Aqueous extracts (%)<br />

Microorganism 3 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 DMSO Methanol -ve<br />

Staphylococcus<br />

aureus<br />

- - + + + + + +<br />

-<br />

Microorganism 7 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 DMSO Methanol -ve<br />

Bacillus subtilis<br />

- + + + + + + + -<br />

‘+’ indicates Growth <strong>of</strong> Bacteria (resistant to extract),<br />

‘-‘Indicates No Growth <strong>of</strong> Bacteria (sensitive to extract)<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The study showed presence <strong>of</strong> phytochemicals like tannins, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, essential oil,<br />

fatty acids which were determined by standard procedures. <strong>Antibacterial</strong> <strong>activity</strong> was tested against<br />

S.aureus and B.subtilis and S.aureus was found to be more susceptible against both the extracts (young<br />

leaves showed better results in comparison to mature leaves) whereas B.subtilis showed moderate results<br />

for both the types <strong>of</strong> leaves for both extracts. Minimum inhibitory concentration was also carried out to<br />

find out concentration <strong>of</strong> extract causing inhibition <strong>of</strong> bacterial growth. Thus it can be concluded that<br />

maturity <strong>of</strong> leaves play an important role in determining its mode <strong>of</strong> action.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. K.S.Jayaraman, Manoharan S.M.,IIachezian S. (2008). <strong>Antibacterial</strong>,Antifungal and<br />

Tumor cell suppression potential <strong>of</strong> Morinda Citrifolia fruit extracts. International journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> integrative biology. 3: 44- 48.<br />

2. P.G.Wilson, O. Brien, M. Marcelle, P.A. Gadek and C. Quinn, Myrtaceae Revised: A<br />

reassessment <strong>of</strong> Infrafamilial groups. Am. J. Bot., 2001, 88: 2013-2025.<br />

3. M.L.H. Khan, J.Ahmad, A pharmacognostic study <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava L., International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Crude Drug Research, 1985, 23:95–103,<br />

4. J.Li, , F. Chen and J. Luo, Gc-MS analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oil from the leaves <strong>of</strong> Psidium<br />

guajava. Zhong Yao Cai, 1999, 22: 78-80.<br />

215 <strong>IJGHC</strong>; 2012, Vol.1, No.3, 211-216


<strong>Phytochemical</strong>...<br />

Meenakshi Vaidya<br />

5. P. Jaiarj, Anticough and antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava leaves extract. J.<br />

Ethopharmacol, 1999 ,67: 203-212<br />

6. H.Arima, G.Danno, Isolation <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial compounds from guava (Psidium guajava<br />

L.) and their structural elucidation, Biosci Biotechnol Biochem,2002, 66(8): 1727-1730<br />

7. S.Begum, S.I.Hassan, B.S.Siddiqui, Two new triterpenoids from the fresh leaves <strong>of</strong><br />

Psidium guajava. Planta Med, 2002, 68: 1149-1152,<br />

8. A.H. Gilani, Triterpenoids from the leaves <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava. Phytochemistry, 2002, 61:<br />

399-403<br />

9. H.N.Michael, J.Y. Salib and M.S. Ishak,. Acylated flavonol glycoside from Psidium<br />

guajava L. seeds. Pharmazie, 2002, 57: 859-860.<br />

10. M.J.Jordan, C.A. Margaria, P.E. Shaw and K.I. Goodner, Volatile components and aroma<br />

active compounds in <strong>aqueous</strong> essence and fresh pink guava fruit puree (Psidium guajava<br />

L.) by GC-MS and multidimensional GC/GC-O. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2003, 51: 1421-<br />

1426.<br />

*Correspondence Author: Meenakshi Vaidya; Department <strong>of</strong> Botany, Mithibai College,<br />

Vile Parle (West), Mumbai 400 056. Email: minakshiv@yahoo.com<br />

216 <strong>IJGHC</strong>; 2012, Vol.1, No.3, 211-216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!