PDF-Download - Kältetechnik aircool GmbH
PDF-Download - Kältetechnik aircool GmbH
PDF-Download - Kältetechnik aircool GmbH
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Air Conditioning - Refrigeration<br />
Chillers<br />
Therefore check, who will be eternally bound<br />
special part<br />
Lars Keller, Munich,<br />
Ralf Beleth, Karlsruhe<br />
This comparison of various chiller units<br />
and associated heat exchangers should<br />
provide help in determining on a<br />
project specific basis the optimal<br />
machine. The general rule is that all<br />
relevant factors be taken into account<br />
for the application, and to carry out a<br />
weighting and evaluation.<br />
Rating the Efficiency<br />
To assess the efficiency of chillers, the<br />
valuation by Eurovent and ARI are<br />
widespread. The ratio of nominal<br />
cooling capacity to electrical power<br />
consumption of the compressors and<br />
the power consumption of all control<br />
and security measures, is according to<br />
Eurovent defined as EER (ENERGY<br />
EFFICIENCY RATIO) and is the basis of<br />
classification from the most efficient<br />
"Class A" extending to the most inefficient<br />
"Class F". The ESEER (EUROPEAN<br />
SEASONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY RATIO)<br />
according to Eurovent and IPLV<br />
(INTEGRATED PART LOAD VALUE)<br />
according to ARI Standard 550/590-<br />
2003 makes a statement about the<br />
efficiency of chillers at full and partial<br />
load with decreasing coolant temperature.<br />
Autoren<br />
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Lars Keller<br />
as Head of Sales / Marketing at<br />
<strong>Kältetechnik</strong> <strong>aircool</strong> <strong>GmbH</strong> and author<br />
of numerous technical publications and<br />
the book Guide for Ventilation and Air<br />
Conditioning.<br />
This is true, not only in life, but also in the purchase of a new chiller.<br />
Water-cooled chillers with capacities ranging from approximately 2<br />
MW are currently available in various configurations. Compressors are<br />
of the semi-hermetic screw or turbo type, the refrigerant R-134a and<br />
R410A are prevalent, and shell and tube heat exchangers will be<br />
installed. In the cooling system, the operator is faced with the decision<br />
to use dry coolers, Hybrid coolers or cooling towers.<br />
But to get a reliable statement concerning<br />
the anticipated cost of operation,<br />
the expected load characteristics have<br />
to be determined and calculated. This<br />
must be done for the entire system<br />
(chiller, pumps and heat exchangers),<br />
as a one-sided optimization of the<br />
chiller does not necessarily minimize<br />
the total cost of operation.<br />
Here, the following criteria are to be<br />
observed:<br />
• The lower the cooling water outlet<br />
temperature at the condenser of the<br />
refrigeration unit, the more efficiently<br />
it is operating and it provides more<br />
capacity. (Vendor Specific limits are to<br />
be observed, as a minimum pressure<br />
ratio pc/ po is necessary)<br />
• The smaller the difference between<br />
the cooling water outlet temperature<br />
of the cooling tower and the wet bulb<br />
temperature, the higher are investment<br />
costs and space requirements of<br />
the cooling tower.<br />
• The greater the cooling water temperature<br />
spread, the lower the flow rate,<br />
pump capacity and pipe dimensions,<br />
practice has shown that 5 to 8 K to be<br />
an economic size for the entire plant.<br />
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Ralf Beleth<br />
is a sales representative at the<br />
KTK Kühlturm Karlsruhe <strong>GmbH</strong><br />
Which is the correct<br />
refrigerant<br />
For years, the mono-chlorine-free<br />
refrigerant R134a has established itself<br />
due to its favorable thermodynamic<br />
properties. The advantage is seen in<br />
the low differential pressure pc-po and<br />
the high critical temperature, which is<br />
not achieved during operation. Turbo<br />
chillers are always operated with<br />
R134a. The non-azeotropic refrigerant<br />
R410A is a mixture of 50% R125 and<br />
R32, with a negligible boiling range at a<br />
phase change of less than 0.2 K. The<br />
disadvantage is the high pressure<br />
needed, which places enormous<br />
demands on the screw compressor<br />
technology. Due to the high volumetric<br />
cooling capacity, less Refrigerant<br />
charge is needed and smaller compressors<br />
are necessary than for R134a. To<br />
illustrate, here an example: A screw<br />
compressor with R134a as refrigerant<br />
provides 100 kW cooling capacity, by<br />
using R410A it will provide about 230<br />
kW! This results in compact equipment<br />
dimensions and low cost. The ODP<br />
(Ozone Depletion Potential) makes a<br />
statement about the destructive effect<br />
of ozone, the refrigerant and data are<br />
based on the CFC R11 with ODP = 1<br />
The GWP (Greenhouse Warming Potential<br />
/ Global Warming Potential) represents<br />
the global warming potential of a<br />
substance as opposed to CO2. The<br />
GWP-factor makes a statement about<br />
how many times stronger in comparison<br />
to CO2, the direct contribution to<br />
the greenhouse effect is over a specified<br />
time horizon of 100 years. For<br />
example, if 1 kg of refrigerant R134a is<br />
emitted into the atmosphere, this is<br />
equivalent to an emission of 1300 kg<br />
C02.<br />
40 HLH Bd. 60 (2009) Nr. 10 - October
Air Conditioning - Refrigeration<br />
R134a R410A<br />
Volumetric cooling capacity 0°/40° kJ/m 3 2.050 4.781<br />
Evaporation heat kJ/kg 216 268<br />
Critical temperature °C 101 71<br />
Absolute pressure at 0 ° C(p o ) bar 2,93 8,06<br />
Absolute pressure at 40 ° C (p c ) bar 10,17 24,36<br />
Differential pressure p c - p o bar 7,24 16,3<br />
Pressure ratio p c / p o - 3,47 3,02<br />
Temperature glide K 0 < 0,2<br />
ODP - 0 0<br />
GWP (relative to CO2, 100a) - 1.300 1.720<br />
OEL (occupational exposure limit) kg/m 3 0,25 0,44<br />
The TEWI (Total Equivalent Warming<br />
Impact) takes into account the sum of<br />
direct (GWP contribution of refrigerant<br />
leaks during installation and disposal)<br />
and indirect (contribution of CO2<br />
emissions resulting from energy<br />
consumption to operate the plant)<br />
emissions of greenhouse gases. If the<br />
refrigerant loss is minimized, then the<br />
influence of the GWP in the TEWI is very<br />
low. A comparison of the main physical<br />
data is shown in Table 1.<br />
Turbo or Screw<br />
The semi-hermetical screw compressors<br />
are in the power range up to 2200<br />
kW, depending on the refrigerant, the<br />
operating conditions and number of<br />
compressors. They show a wide range<br />
of operation, they can be used with the<br />
default configuration; varying flow<br />
temperatures of -8 ° C to 15 ° C with<br />
cooling water outlet temperatures of<br />
up to 55 ° C. The performance adjustment<br />
should be continuously adjustable<br />
from 25 to 100% of the standard<br />
cooling capacity, a flow temperature<br />
control is to be considered as prior art.<br />
Compressors are started via the<br />
star-delta, to reduce the starting<br />
current a soft start can be used, more<br />
recently, frequency converters are<br />
used. McQuay semi-hermetic-turbo<br />
compressors are used in the power<br />
range from 900 to 4500 kW. Since a<br />
maximum of two compressors can be<br />
used in a refrigeration circuit, a capacity<br />
of up to 9 MW can be achieved. Each<br />
turbo chiller is based on a projectspecific<br />
configuration; the selection of<br />
the main components such as motors,<br />
compressors, gears and gear ratios,<br />
impeller and heat exchangers is dependent<br />
on the operating conditions. For<br />
this reason, as well as flooded evaporation,<br />
which requires an exact Refrigerant<br />
charge, varying operating points<br />
Table 1<br />
are not quite as arbitrary as with screw<br />
chillers and must be verified for the<br />
configuration. The adjustable power<br />
control from 10 to 100% is best carried<br />
out using the inlet guide vane setting<br />
via oil pressure. The turbine can be<br />
started via star / delta or soft-start, by<br />
mounting an optional VFD (Variable<br />
Frequency Drive, frequency converter)<br />
corresponding to the starting current,<br />
respective to the operating current<br />
(Figure 1). Again, the VFD will significantly<br />
contribute to an increase in the<br />
ESEER / IPLV, through the loss dissipation<br />
of the frequency converter; however<br />
the 100% EER decreases by about<br />
2.5%. In Table 2 a comparison of<br />
different Chillers at different operating<br />
points and cooling systems can be<br />
seen.<br />
Cooling Towers<br />
When it comes to cooling towers everyone<br />
has probably one of those big<br />
steaming power generation plant<br />
cooling towers in mind. For a large<br />
portion of the cooling tower processes,<br />
standard cooling towers are implemented.<br />
However, they perform their job in<br />
Physical Data for the refrigerants<br />
R134a und R410A<br />
most instances well concealed and can<br />
only be seen when taking a closer look<br />
at the roofs. Often, cooling tower<br />
issues of are placed in the background,<br />
even with respect to: The relatively<br />
small cost compared to the cooling<br />
system, although the choice of an<br />
appropriate process, system, tuning of<br />
the refrigeration unit and integration<br />
into the overall system has a significant<br />
impact on the efficiency of the overall<br />
system.<br />
Distinction between the<br />
methods of heat transfer<br />
to the outside<br />
Basically, two methods are used to<br />
dissipate the excess heat to the<br />
environment. Dry cooling transfers the<br />
heat to the surrounding air by the<br />
temperature gradient of the coolant to<br />
ambient air temperature. Accordingly,<br />
the high temperature of the cooling<br />
medium of approx. 45/40 ° C is<br />
assumed when designing for the<br />
Picture 1<br />
2.5 MW turbo chiller WSC 100 with<br />
free-standing frequency converter of<br />
protection IP54 to improve part-load<br />
efficiency at decreasing coolant temperature.<br />
HLH Bd. 60 (2009) Nr. 10 - October<br />
41
Air Conditioning - Refrigeration<br />
Chiller Specifications<br />
Unit<br />
Proximus Evolution 596.2 XE S T<br />
WSC<br />
100<br />
WDC<br />
079<br />
Cooling capacity<br />
kW 2.268 2.196 1.933 2.200<br />
2.200<br />
2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200<br />
Power consumption at the terminal box kW<br />
434<br />
461<br />
553<br />
310<br />
352<br />
509<br />
314<br />
352<br />
523<br />
Condenser capacity<br />
kW 2.702 2.657 2.486 2.510<br />
2.552<br />
2.709 2.514 2.552 2.723<br />
Cold water temperatures °C<br />
12 / 7 12/ 7 12<br />
/ 7<br />
Cooling water temperatures °C 27 / 32 30 / 35 40 / 45 27 / 32<br />
30 / 35<br />
40<br />
/ 45 27 / 32 30 / 35 40 / 45<br />
Medium Water 34% Glycol 34% Glycol Water 34% Glycol<br />
34% Glycol Water 34% Glycol 34% Glycol<br />
Performance figures - 5,2<br />
4,8<br />
3,5<br />
7,1<br />
6,3<br />
4,3<br />
7,0<br />
6,3<br />
4, 2<br />
special part<br />
ESEER-Value - - 5,38 - -<br />
6,21<br />
-<br />
-<br />
7,48 -<br />
Evaporation<br />
dry<br />
flooded<br />
flooded<br />
Number / type of compressors (Units) Quantity 2 / semi-hermetic screw compressor 1 / semi-hermetic turbo compressor<br />
2 / semi-hermetic turbo compressor<br />
Capacity control at constant cooling<br />
water temperature<br />
% 12.5 - 100<br />
10 - 100<br />
10 - 100<br />
20<br />
- 100 5 - 100 5 - 100 20 - 100<br />
Length x Width x Hight<br />
mm<br />
4.800 x 1.350 x 2 .550<br />
4.300<br />
x 2.100 x 2 .550<br />
5.600<br />
x 1.800 x 2.550<br />
Refrigerant circuits<br />
Quantity<br />
2 1<br />
1<br />
Refrigerant<br />
R<br />
410A<br />
134a<br />
134a<br />
Refrigerant charge amount<br />
kg<br />
2 x 130<br />
636<br />
670<br />
670<br />
884<br />
920<br />
878<br />
Cooling<br />
Circuit<br />
Technical Data heat exchangers<br />
Design temperature<br />
Unit<br />
° C<br />
Evaporation cooler for an open<br />
circuit with centrifugal fans<br />
2 x KD 2/18-28-S2<br />
Evaporation cooler for a<br />
closed circuit with<br />
centrifugal fans<br />
2 x KI 3/12-28-12<br />
Dual cooling system / hybrid<br />
coolers for closed circuit<br />
with axial fans<br />
3 x KA VH-09-2x6<br />
Chiller for a closed circuit<br />
with centrifugal fans<br />
3 x KA VL-09-2x6<br />
Evaporative c ooling<br />
Evaporative<br />
cooling / Dry c ooling<br />
Dry<br />
cooling<br />
open c ircuit<br />
closed<br />
circuit<br />
closed circuit<br />
wet bulb 21 °C wet bulb 21 °C<br />
wet bulb and ambient air<br />
temperature 21°C / 18 °C<br />
ambient air temperature 32°C<br />
Cooling agent<br />
Water<br />
Water-glycol mixture 34%<br />
Water-glycol mixture 34%<br />
Cooling water temperature °C<br />
32 / 27<br />
35<br />
/ 30<br />
45<br />
/ 40<br />
Cooling c apacity<br />
kW<br />
2.700<br />
- 2.500 2.650 - 2.550 2.650 - 2.550<br />
2.700 - 2.500<br />
Ventilator shaft capacity max. kW 20,8 48,44<br />
86,4<br />
90,00<br />
Type of water q uality<br />
Basis<br />
VDI 3803 Basis VDI 3803<br />
Osmotic water<br />
-<br />
Additional water conditioning necessary<br />
- hardness stabilization, corrosion<br />
yes yes<br />
no<br />
-<br />
protection, organic load<br />
Evaporation water quantity max.<br />
(full load)<br />
m³/h<br />
4,0<br />
3,9<br />
3,9<br />
-<br />
Water discharge reference value<br />
m³/h<br />
1, 3<br />
1,3<br />
0,6<br />
-<br />
Sound output level with out / with<br />
additional sound elimination measures<br />
dB(A)<br />
99 / 78 105 / 84 108 / -<br />
99 / -<br />
Dimensions Length x Width x Height mm 2 x 5.000 x 3.700 x 2.400 2 x 5.000 x 3.700 x 2.900 3 x 9.300 x 2.250 x 2.400<br />
3 x 9.300 x 2.250 x 2.370<br />
Floor space approx. (without<br />
maintenance area)<br />
m²<br />
37<br />
37<br />
63<br />
63<br />
Operational weight cooling towers<br />
kg<br />
12.800<br />
29.000<br />
24.600<br />
12.900<br />
Table 2<br />
Technical Data of various refrigeration<br />
units and heat exchangers<br />
typical maximum surrounding air<br />
temperatures in the summer of about<br />
32 to 34 ° C in Germany. In wet or<br />
evaporative cooling, one takes advantage<br />
of the physical effect that for a<br />
corresponding change in the<br />
aggregate state, vaporization energy is<br />
required. Thus evaporative cooling<br />
towers have a considerably greater<br />
efficiency of heat dissipation because<br />
of latent heat. Compared to dry<br />
cooling, significantly lower the temperatures<br />
of the cooling medium can be<br />
achieved, since the ambient air temperature<br />
is not critical, but the wet bulb<br />
temperature is. Thus cooling media<br />
temperatures of e.g. 32/27 ° C can be<br />
achieved in an implementation for a<br />
wet bulb temperature of 21 to 22 ° (Fig.<br />
2). Dry or glycol coolers are often given<br />
preference over evaporative cooling,<br />
because it avoids the hassle and cost of<br />
water consumption and water<br />
treatment. For decentralized and<br />
relatively small plants dry cooling may<br />
be the choice, but in large and centralized<br />
systems, evaporative cooling is to<br />
be preferred.<br />
42 HLH Bd. 60 (2009) Nr. 10 - October
Air Conditioning - Refrigeration<br />
A comparison of space and power<br />
consumption can be seen in Table 2.<br />
However, in any case the choice<br />
between dry / evaporative cooling, the<br />
impact on the chiller should also be<br />
taken into account. The example of the<br />
turbo chiller WSC 100, the clamp power<br />
consumption when using a dry cooler<br />
is 509 kW, when using an evaporative<br />
cooling tower, however, the power<br />
consumption is only 310 kW: Thus just<br />
by the choice of implementing another<br />
cooling process the electrical energy<br />
used by the chiller can be reduced by<br />
40%!<br />
Distinction based on the cooling<br />
medium system<br />
Here one can also distinguish two basic<br />
systems. Certainly the oldest and best<br />
known method is that heated water is<br />
exposed directly to the ambient air,<br />
and by way of evaporation of part of<br />
the water, cooling of the same is achieved.<br />
Cooling towers where the water is<br />
directly exposed to the ambient air are<br />
designated as open cooling towers<br />
(open cooling water circuit). The<br />
earliest cooling towers emerged at the<br />
beginning of industrialization in the<br />
form of natural draft cooling towers<br />
which were relatively simple wooden<br />
structures. Graduation houses are in<br />
use today for another purpose but<br />
operate on the same principle. The<br />
most efficient heat transfer is achieved<br />
by way of direct contact of water with<br />
the ambient air. However, the water is<br />
exposed to contamination in the air<br />
and adds to the impurities such as<br />
water dissolved minerals are thereby<br />
concentrated, since only pure water in<br />
its vapor phase may leave the circuit,<br />
this should be taken into account in<br />
plant design, e.g. through a impurity<br />
factor in the chiller. If this qualitative<br />
change in the water can not be<br />
accepted, protection may be achieved<br />
by separation of the circuits to be<br />
cooled machine / system from the<br />
influence of the polluted water. If it is<br />
realized directly in the cooling tower<br />
loop separation, usually by the installation<br />
of a tube bundle heat exchanger),<br />
it is known as a "closed cooling tower"<br />
(closed cooling water circuit).<br />
Which is the cooling tower<br />
that you would like to have<br />
To begin with, this question can not be<br />
answered here. If the end-user / operator<br />
wants to have an efficiently operating<br />
system, the cooling tower manufacturers<br />
will be happy to provide a<br />
detailed consultation. In recent<br />
decades, a wide variety of different<br />
types of cooling towers for various<br />
applications have been developed,<br />
which are described below.<br />
Open cooling towers with<br />
centrifugal fans<br />
They are well suited by their compact<br />
design for use in a small space, are of<br />
low weight and move large amounts of<br />
heat with as little energy as possible.<br />
The centrifugal fans offer the ability to<br />
mount additional silencers, so that<br />
even demanding noise requirements<br />
can be met. Because of the mode of<br />
operation it is obviously not possible to<br />
use dry cooling, which means that over<br />
the entire operating life one must<br />
expect correspondingly high water<br />
consumption. However, open cooling<br />
towers may be used at sufficiently low<br />
temperatures for "free cooling" (i.e.<br />
cooling without refrigeration machine<br />
operation). The minimum cooling water<br />
temperature usable with free cooling,<br />
however, is limited due to the risk of ice<br />
formation at below10 degrees C.<br />
Closed cooling towers with<br />
centrifugal fans<br />
The tube bundle heat exchangers of the<br />
cooling water circuit is protected from<br />
pollution, but the required space,<br />
weight and energy requirements are<br />
higher than for an open cooling tower.<br />
Silencers can be mounted, as well as<br />
the operation for free cooling. Additionally,<br />
it is possible to run the cooling<br />
tower in dry mode. In observance of the<br />
cooling water temperatures and the<br />
ambient air temperature, the tube<br />
bundle heat exchanger in dry operation,<br />
can dissipate approximately 10 to<br />
20% of the designated capacity of the<br />
chiller in operation. An application<br />
example is the air conditioning of a<br />
building, which in the transitional<br />
period and in the winter only one server<br />
room needs to be cooled.<br />
HLH Bd. 60 (2009) Nr. 10 - October<br />
43
Air Conditioning - Refrigeration<br />
Dual heat exchangers or<br />
hybrid coolers<br />
special part<br />
The aim of these units is to combine<br />
the benefits of evaporative and dry<br />
cooling in one device. Thus it is possible<br />
on the one hand, to reach the low<br />
temperatures of an evaporative<br />
cooling, and on the other hand<br />
through the rational selection of the<br />
switching point between wet and dry<br />
operation of approximately 15 to 18 ° C<br />
to achieve considerable savings of<br />
water. Lower set points worsen the<br />
water savings and thus the cost<br />
savings. The devices are designed so<br />
that even at the switchover point, the<br />
full cooling tower capacity is available.<br />
These systems with intelligent and<br />
effectively controlled equipment also<br />
have their price.<br />
Dry coolers or "glycol"<br />
These devices have a relatively simple<br />
structure, consisting of a tube bundle<br />
with slats designed to achieve the<br />
greatest possible heat transfer surface<br />
area. Fans provide the necessary<br />
exchange of air. Of course you do not<br />
need any extra water, but usually have<br />
higher electric power consumption<br />
than an evaporative cooler and, as<br />
already mentioned, the higher coolant<br />
temperatures have a negative impact<br />
on the performance numbers of the<br />
chiller. Advantageous is the ease of<br />
installation, the closed cooling circuit<br />
and the high potential for free cooling<br />
capacity.<br />
Water preparation and treatment<br />
for evaporative cooling towers<br />
Evaporative cooling towers can fulfill<br />
their purpose, only when the water<br />
quality is good. The best cooling tower<br />
will fail, if insufficient attention is paid<br />
to the manufacturer's guidelines for<br />
water quality. The currently available<br />
equipment e.g. for water softening,<br />
desalination are relatively easy to<br />
handle. When designing the system,<br />
specialized firms will provide appropriate<br />
guidance.<br />
Energy-efficient operation<br />
of cooling towers<br />
Because a cooling tower is usually<br />
designed for the highest summer<br />
temperatures (e.g. wet bulb temperature<br />
of 21 ° C) it is at all lower temperatures<br />
actually oversized. The resulting<br />
Picture 2<br />
h-x diagram, a representation of<br />
the process of dry and wet<br />
cooling. In the initial state at the<br />
entry point of the air is the same.<br />
Through the various processes<br />
involved the corresponding line<br />
results.<br />
"extra" power is not really needed. The<br />
performance adjustment can be<br />
effected by regulation of the airflow<br />
through the cooling tower. For a long<br />
time, the fans were operated with<br />
motors having 2 or sometimes even 3<br />
switchable speeds. Thanks to the fact<br />
that the frequency converter which is<br />
only slightly more expensive than the<br />
contactor control circuit for a speed<br />
switch, they are frequently implemented<br />
and for energy-efficient operation<br />
they are the best choice. In connection<br />
with the control of the chiller by use of<br />
a frequency converter, a continuously<br />
variable cooling water temperature<br />
can easily be achieved.<br />
Conclusion<br />
A blanket statement, which system<br />
version should be implemented is not<br />
possible, the project relevant factors<br />
such as capital and operating costs,<br />
efficiency, redundancy, reliability,<br />
setup time and situation, plant layout,<br />
ambient temperatures, and noise<br />
standards, as well as (to name but a<br />
few) must be taken into account. To<br />
find the ideal chiller / cooling tower<br />
combination on the basis of investment<br />
and operating costs, in preparation<br />
a load profile must be created,<br />
which also provides information on the<br />
required partial load performance of<br />
each unit. Frequency converters provide<br />
low starting currents and high<br />
ESEER / IPLV values, and at constant<br />
cooling water temperatures the operating<br />
cost savings are not so great.<br />
Basically, it is necessary to determine<br />
whether heat recovery and / or free<br />
cooling can be implemented, the<br />
performance numbers (benefits / costs)<br />
which can thus be realized, cannot be<br />
achieved by any of the most efficient<br />
compression refrigeration machines!<br />
44 HLH Bd. 60 (2009) Nr. 10 - October