21.01.2015 Views

Submission on Draft Water Sharing Plan for the Murrumbidgee River

Submission on Draft Water Sharing Plan for the Murrumbidgee River

Submission on Draft Water Sharing Plan for the Murrumbidgee River

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Inland <strong>River</strong>s Network and Nature C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Council submissi<strong>on</strong>:<br />

<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Sharing</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Murrumbidgee</strong> Regulated <strong>River</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Source – 14 June 2002<br />

• c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Aboriginal Heritage In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> System register of sites and Aboriginal places.<br />

• habitat requirements <strong>for</strong> totemic and o<strong>the</strong>r culturally important species, including threatened species in<br />

<strong>the</strong> water management area.<br />

• c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> of c<strong>on</strong>temporary Aboriginal needs and uses of water and related water resources.<br />

Whilst IRN, NCC and ACF are in full support of water allocati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> indigenous purposes, we str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />

oppose such water being taken from <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment. As such we believe that Part 5 ‘Basic landholder<br />

rights’, and specifically Clauses 27, 28 and 31, [a <strong>for</strong>matting error exists at this point as Clause 29 and 30 are<br />

not included] need to be streng<strong>the</strong>ned in terms of <strong>the</strong>ir treatment of native title rights.<br />

Recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

IRN, NCC and ACF recommend that:<br />

• The following clauses be included after Clause 31:<br />

− “A native title holder in relati<strong>on</strong> to waters of <strong>the</strong> water source is entitled, under <strong>the</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 55 of <strong>the</strong> Act, to take and use water in <strong>the</strong> exercise of native title rights.”<br />

− “Should native title rights that extend bey<strong>on</strong>d those which are provided <strong>for</strong> in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Management<br />

Act 2000, or in this <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Sharing</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, be found to exist in a court of law, this plan will be reviewed<br />

and amended accordingly under Secti<strong>on</strong> 42(2) of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Management Act 2000.”<br />

− “At <strong>the</strong> commencement of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> no native title rights have been granted <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Murrumbidgee</strong><br />

Regulated <strong>River</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Source”<br />

− “The <strong>Plan</strong> recognises that <strong>the</strong> exercise of native title rights, as defined in Secti<strong>on</strong> 55 of <strong>the</strong> Act, may<br />

increase during <strong>the</strong> term of this <strong>Plan</strong>”<br />

− “Any granting of water allocati<strong>on</strong>s under native title rights must be allocated from <strong>the</strong> BEV <strong>for</strong> each<br />

flow class and cannot impact up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreed EHW allocati<strong>on</strong>s”.<br />

• Evidence should also be provided of having c<strong>on</strong>sidered <strong>the</strong> Aboriginal Heritage In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> System<br />

register of sites and Aboriginal places, or <strong>the</strong> habitat requirements <strong>for</strong> totemic and o<strong>the</strong>r culturally<br />

important species, including threatened species in <strong>the</strong> water management area.<br />

MANAGING ALLOCATIONS TO REGULATED RIVER (HIGH SECURITY) AND REGULATED<br />

RIVER (GENERAL SECURITY) ACCESS LICENCE HOLDERS<br />

Minister’s Note: (Part B, p.19)<br />

IRN, NCC and ACF support <strong>the</strong> CoAG c<strong>on</strong>cept of water trading which is that water should be used “to<br />

maximise its c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to nati<strong>on</strong>al income and welfare, within <strong>the</strong> social, physical, and ecological<br />

c<strong>on</strong>straints of catchments” (1994 CoAG Agreement, Clause 5[a]). We believe that this facilitates <strong>the</strong> flow of<br />

water to <strong>the</strong> highest value uses where <strong>the</strong>re are greater incentives to c<strong>on</strong>serve water.<br />

As such, we oppose Clause 75(h), which places a c<strong>on</strong>straint <strong>on</strong> temporary trade of water through <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>feit<br />

of carryover and access to supplementary water.<br />

Recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />

IRN, NCC and ACF recommend that:<br />

• Clause 75(h), which places a c<strong>on</strong>straint <strong>on</strong> temporary trade of water through <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>feit of carryover and<br />

access to supplementary water, is removed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Sharing</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Murrumbidgee</strong> Regulated<br />

<strong>River</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Source.<br />

MANAGEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTARY WATER<br />

Minister’s Note: (Part B, p.22)<br />

IRN, NCC and ACF agrees with <strong>the</strong> Minister’s Note Part B, p.22 that unregulated flows emanating from<br />

tributaries or dam spills are potentially very important <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecological functi<strong>on</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong> river system.<br />

These flows significantly impact <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mental benefit of natural ‘freshes’ and dam spills, and should<br />

be omitted from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Draft</strong> WSP. These licences have been cancelled in <strong>the</strong> past and we see no reas<strong>on</strong> why<br />

<strong>the</strong>y should be c<strong>on</strong>sidered again. Extracti<strong>on</strong> from ‘freshes’ and spills will also diminish <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of<br />

stored envir<strong>on</strong>mental releases throughout <strong>the</strong> river system, particularly in <strong>the</strong> lower reaches.<br />

- 7 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!