the body-mind dichotomy a problem or artifact? - Piotr Lenartowicz SJ

21
IV. Conclusions
In my opinion the Mind–Body Problem is a mental artifact. The presumably crucial
contrast between the (living) Body and the (human) Mind seems to be a misconception.
The truly important, factual split remains between:
(a) the non-integrative laws of self-organization – physical matter
and
(b) the integrative laws of self-organization – living bodies.
The principles of the physical patterns of self-organization are numerous, different
upon various levels of the scale of complexity (subatomic, molecular, geological,
astrophysical). The integrated pattern of the changes going on in a living body indicates
an integrated nature of its principle – whatever it might happen to be. Aristotle
called this kind of principle „psyché”, H. Driesch called it „entelecheia”, sociobiologists
believe that DNA is the right name for it. The fundamental problem consists
in seeing – not just deciding a priori – if the empirical data do require – in a living
organism – a single, integrating agency. If such a requirement originates in an illusion,
the whole problem is fictitious. If this requirement is well founded, then we must to
search for such an agent.
The main source of the difficulties exposed in the Brüntrup's paper come from a set
of strange, methodological and epistemological decisions, consisting mainly in the
refusal to see what is evident, the arbitrary selection of data and the arbitrary classification
of data. To this list of accusations I would like to add the uncritical acceptance
of an assortment of embarrassingly simplistic „solutions”.
Two Kinds of the Efficient Causality
Reductionists clearly distinguish between two levels of reality – one superficial,
accessible to common sense, and the more essential level, supposedly accessible only
to scientists. This distinction ought to be applied to the causal aspect as well. What we
see in our consciousness might be compared to the messages visible on the computer
monitor. The causality of those messages is practically null. The true, physical causality
resides in the invisible sphere of the hardware, the invisible program and the input
from the keyboard. Only fragmentary, symbolic and physically passive aspects of the
complex dynamism of the computer appear on the monitor. Similarly, it seems, the true
causality determining our capacity to act and to select a rational way of behavior is hidden
deeper than the level of consciousness, and it is closely related to the development
(ontogenesis) of our „material body”.
The origin of the Body-Mind Artifact
Reductionists substitute the genuine sense of the „living body” with the idea of the
inorganic dynamism represented, roughly speaking, by the periodic system of the
elements (possibly in a quantum mechanical, and essentially statistical interpretation).
Instead of the pair Mind–Body we have to deal, de facto, with the Mind–Inorganic
Matter couple.
The problem of the whole now enters into our discussion. How could our consciousness
be seriously separated from our adult anatomy Of course, one can disregard the