13.11.2012 Views

In Excess: Sergei Eisentein's Mexico - Cineclub

In Excess: Sergei Eisentein's Mexico - Cineclub

In Excess: Sergei Eisentein's Mexico - Cineclub

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Mexico</strong>. It is evident that the choice of the pre-Columbian deities in the<br />

“Prologue” was a result of Eisenstein’s dialogue with Brenner and Best<br />

Maugard, among others.<br />

<strong>In</strong> his letters to his friend, the actor Maxim Shtraukh, Eisenstein makes<br />

direct references to a series of Mexican deities, demonstrating a high level<br />

of familiarity with the subject, and “sadistic” pre-Columbian rituals, noting<br />

that they had triggered his theoretical work. 40<br />

What perhaps interested Eisenstein most was his belief that ancient<br />

Mexican cosmology, as any traditional agricultural worldview, is marked<br />

by a mythological or circular perception of time and history. The circularity<br />

of life and death in ancient Mexican cultures—as in most premodern<br />

agrarian cultures—is tied to the agricultural life-order and what is<br />

now termed a “mythological” or circular perception of time and history:<br />

death is always linked to rebirth, as in the natural life cycle. The worship<br />

of death marks the ceremonial calendar of the Aztecs, for example. Out<br />

of eighteen ritualistic celebrations in accordance with the Aztec calendar,<br />

four are devoted to the offerings to the dead.<br />

<strong>In</strong> the Maya and Aztec religions, the circularity and inseparability of<br />

life and death, of birth and destruction, are best illustrated by the female<br />

deities, who are central to the cosmology. The image of a goddess<br />

is always dual: she is always a nurturing mother, the origin of life, the<br />

beginning, but also the origin of destruction and death. The apocalyptical<br />

aspect is very strong in the Aztec worldview: according to the Aztec<br />

calendar, not only do each of the four ages of the world end with a terrible<br />

catastrophe, but the end of each calendar division of fi fty-two years<br />

is a time of doom, when the end of the world is expected with terror and<br />

chastisements, and the continuation of life is celebrated as a miracle and<br />

rebirth. 41 The origin of this destruction is almost always linked to a female<br />

deity who brings it about. So, in pre-Columbian Mexican religions<br />

the goddess is not only the traditional symbol of birth and fertility but<br />

simultaneously (and equally importantly) the symbol of death and destruction.<br />

Coatlicue, the Aztec goddess of earth and fertility, symbolizes<br />

at once the matrix of all the living and the skull of death. The Maya goddess<br />

Itzamana follows the same principle. She embodies the principle of<br />

opposites: of life and death, but also of the masculine and the feminine.<br />

The primordial Maya gods, the originators of life, are uroboric and bisexual.<br />

42 One is designated as male (Ometecuhtli ) and the other as female<br />

(Omecihuatl ), but both possess equal (which is to say independent and<br />

self-suffi cient) reproductive organs. 43 Visually, the goddess is usually<br />

endowed with phallic symbols and is either giving birth or devouring<br />

a male deity. <strong>In</strong> the words of Mexican anthropologist Félix Báez-Jorge,<br />

eisenstein’s ¡que viva méxico! : 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!