GAO-12-208G, Designing Evaluations: 2012 Revision
GAO-12-208G, Designing Evaluations: 2012 Revision
GAO-12-208G, Designing Evaluations: 2012 Revision
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Net Impact <strong>Evaluations</strong><br />
For More Information<br />
<strong>GAO</strong> documents<br />
Other resources<br />
Chapter 2: Defining the Evaluation’s Scope<br />
longer-term outcomes. For example, it might take a study 3 or more years<br />
to observe whether a program for high school students led to greater<br />
success in college.<br />
Where a program’s desired outcomes are known to also be influenced<br />
appreciably by factors outside the program, such as the labor market, the<br />
outcomes that are actually observed represent a combination of program<br />
effects and the effects of those external factors. In this case, questions<br />
about program effectiveness become more sophisticated and the<br />
evaluation design should attempt to identify the extent to which the<br />
program caused or contributed to those observed changes. Impact<br />
evaluation is a form of outcome evaluation that assesses the net effect of<br />
a program (or its true effectiveness) by comparing the observed<br />
outcomes to an estimate of what would have happened in the absence of<br />
the program. While outcome measures can be incorporated into ongoing<br />
performance monitoring systems, evaluation studies are usually required<br />
to assess program net impacts.<br />
<strong>GAO</strong>. 2004. <strong>GAO</strong>’s Congressional Protocols, <strong>GAO</strong>-04-310G.<br />
Washington, D.C.: July 16.<br />
<strong>GAO</strong>. 2000. Managing for Results: Views on Ensuring the Usefulness of<br />
Agency Performance Information to Congress, <strong>GAO</strong>/GGD-00-35.<br />
Washington, D.C.: Jan. 26.<br />
<strong>GAO</strong>. 2002. Program Evaluation: Strategies for Assessing How<br />
Information Dissemination Contributes to Agency Goals, <strong>GAO</strong>-02-923.<br />
Washington, D.C. Sept. 30.<br />
Bernholz, Eric, and others. 2006. Evaluation Dialogue Between OMB<br />
Staff and Federal Evaluators: Digging a Bit Deeper into Evaluation<br />
Science. Washington, D.C.: July.<br />
http://www.fedeval.net/docs/omb2006briefing.pdf<br />
Rossi, Peter H., Mark W. Lipsey, and Howard E. Freeman. 2004.<br />
Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.<br />
Page 16 <strong>GAO</strong>-<strong>12</strong>-<strong>208G</strong>