13.11.2012 Views

GAO-12-208G, Designing Evaluations: 2012 Revision

GAO-12-208G, Designing Evaluations: 2012 Revision

GAO-12-208G, Designing Evaluations: 2012 Revision

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Net Impact <strong>Evaluations</strong><br />

For More Information<br />

<strong>GAO</strong> documents<br />

Other resources<br />

Chapter 2: Defining the Evaluation’s Scope<br />

longer-term outcomes. For example, it might take a study 3 or more years<br />

to observe whether a program for high school students led to greater<br />

success in college.<br />

Where a program’s desired outcomes are known to also be influenced<br />

appreciably by factors outside the program, such as the labor market, the<br />

outcomes that are actually observed represent a combination of program<br />

effects and the effects of those external factors. In this case, questions<br />

about program effectiveness become more sophisticated and the<br />

evaluation design should attempt to identify the extent to which the<br />

program caused or contributed to those observed changes. Impact<br />

evaluation is a form of outcome evaluation that assesses the net effect of<br />

a program (or its true effectiveness) by comparing the observed<br />

outcomes to an estimate of what would have happened in the absence of<br />

the program. While outcome measures can be incorporated into ongoing<br />

performance monitoring systems, evaluation studies are usually required<br />

to assess program net impacts.<br />

<strong>GAO</strong>. 2004. <strong>GAO</strong>’s Congressional Protocols, <strong>GAO</strong>-04-310G.<br />

Washington, D.C.: July 16.<br />

<strong>GAO</strong>. 2000. Managing for Results: Views on Ensuring the Usefulness of<br />

Agency Performance Information to Congress, <strong>GAO</strong>/GGD-00-35.<br />

Washington, D.C.: Jan. 26.<br />

<strong>GAO</strong>. 2002. Program Evaluation: Strategies for Assessing How<br />

Information Dissemination Contributes to Agency Goals, <strong>GAO</strong>-02-923.<br />

Washington, D.C. Sept. 30.<br />

Bernholz, Eric, and others. 2006. Evaluation Dialogue Between OMB<br />

Staff and Federal Evaluators: Digging a Bit Deeper into Evaluation<br />

Science. Washington, D.C.: July.<br />

http://www.fedeval.net/docs/omb2006briefing.pdf<br />

Rossi, Peter H., Mark W. Lipsey, and Howard E. Freeman. 2004.<br />

Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.<br />

Page 16 <strong>GAO</strong>-<strong>12</strong>-<strong>208G</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!