25.01.2015 Views

“goats and monkeys!”: shakespeare, hobbes, and the state of nature

“goats and monkeys!”: shakespeare, hobbes, and the state of nature

“goats and monkeys!”: shakespeare, hobbes, and the state of nature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MOORE: “GOATS AND MONKEYS!”: SHAKESPEARE, HOBBES, AND THE STATE <br />

OF NATURE <br />

Consider <strong>the</strong> changes we see in O<strong>the</strong>llo once <strong>the</strong> political context is altered. In Venice,<br />

O<strong>the</strong>llo is exceptionally dignified. The ease with which Iago poisons his mind in Cyprus<br />

is all <strong>the</strong> more amazing when we consider how calm <strong>and</strong> restrained O<strong>the</strong>llo is when<br />

confronted by an angry mob on <strong>the</strong> streets <strong>of</strong> Venice. There he does not threaten or boast,<br />

or vow revenge before “yon marble heaven” (3.3.460). He does not call for blood, despite<br />

<strong>the</strong> vitriol <strong>and</strong> sl<strong>and</strong>erous innuendo that is deployed against him. Instead he volunteers to<br />

be taken before <strong>the</strong> authorities: “Whi<strong>the</strong>r will you that I go / To answer this your<br />

charge” (1.2.84-5). It is in Cyprus that Iago is able to work his magic. It is in that<br />

context that O<strong>the</strong>llo can be turned into a savage.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Shakespearean account, humans have <strong>the</strong> capacity to oscillate between two<br />

different <strong>state</strong>s <strong>of</strong> being. O<strong>the</strong>llo’s transformation from loving husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> respected<br />

general into a savage murderer is a clear representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slip from civilized to<br />

brutish. This slip is facilitated primarily by Iago who convinces O<strong>the</strong>llo <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

account <strong>of</strong> human (especially female) <strong>nature</strong>. The transition from Venice to Cyprus is<br />

partially a symbolic one. However, this change in context also plays a substantive role in<br />

<strong>the</strong> plot. When O<strong>the</strong>llo strikes Desdemona in Act 4, Lodovico responds, “My lord, this<br />

would not be believed in Venice, / Though I should swear I saw’t” (4.1.233-4),<br />

suggesting a real difference between <strong>the</strong> way people behave in <strong>the</strong> republican city-<strong>state</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong>y behave in <strong>the</strong> military outpost. Though Lodovico pleads with O<strong>the</strong>llo to<br />

make amends with Desdemona, he does not restrain O<strong>the</strong>llo’s wrath as <strong>the</strong> Venetian<br />

senate restrained Brabantio’s. While Fudge claims that reason is <strong>of</strong>ten identified in <strong>the</strong><br />

early modern period as <strong>the</strong> criteria for human status, both Shakespeare <strong>and</strong> Hobbes<br />

emphasize a different threshold: for both, political community, not reason, is <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!