âgoats and monkeys!â: shakespeare, hobbes, and the state of nature
âgoats and monkeys!â: shakespeare, hobbes, and the state of nature
âgoats and monkeys!â: shakespeare, hobbes, and the state of nature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MOORE: “GOATS AND MONKEYS!”: SHAKESPEARE, HOBBES, AND THE STATE <br />
OF NATURE <br />
Hobbes identifies liberty as <strong>the</strong> first right <strong>of</strong> <strong>nature</strong> <strong>and</strong> describes it as “<strong>the</strong><br />
absence <strong>of</strong> external impediments.” 62 Both King Lear <strong>and</strong> O<strong>the</strong>llo question <strong>the</strong> degree to<br />
which <strong>nature</strong> imposes limits on human beings. Both plays suggest that our natural<br />
autonomy, our essential liberty is <strong>the</strong> thing that makes us human. In early modern<br />
Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re was an emergent sense that <strong>the</strong> “subject no longer locates <strong>the</strong> self as an<br />
inherent part <strong>of</strong> a meaningfully ordered cosmos.” Instead “<strong>the</strong> basic social unit is <strong>the</strong><br />
individual, whose membership in community must be created.” 63 Shakespeare’s<br />
argument is essentially that <strong>the</strong> political order needs to account for this human autonomy.<br />
In this way his plays evidence a transition from an underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> politics as divinely<br />
ordered to one that underst<strong>and</strong>s human community as constructed, a movement in early<br />
modern political thought that would later be advanced dramatically by Hobbes’<br />
Leviathan.<br />
62 Hobbes, Leviathan, 98.<br />
63 Wells Slights, “Slaves <strong>and</strong> Subjects in O<strong>the</strong>llo,” 377-8.<br />
116