25.01.2015 Views

southern sudan health system assessment - Health Systems 20/20

southern sudan health system assessment - Health Systems 20/20

southern sudan health system assessment - Health Systems 20/20

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State level<br />

As described in the National <strong>Health</strong> Policy, the state level is responsible for the overall management of<br />

county <strong>health</strong> services. Specifically, this task includes monitoring, evaluating, and auditing contracts with<br />

NGO <strong>health</strong> providers; managing public providers; allocating resources; doing strategic planning; and<br />

coordinating the different actors within the <strong>health</strong> <strong>system</strong>.<br />

Interviews with state-level officials reveal that there is considerable confusion as to the degree of<br />

authority the state level has vis-à-vis the central level. All states interviewed were familiar with the roles<br />

and responsibilities set out in Box 5; however, they also commented that they were unclear on how to<br />

operationalize those roles, and that there was significant overlap between certain state-, county-, and<br />

central-level duties. States also commented that they lack the critical resources needed to accomplish<br />

their roles, including basic skills in financial management and bookkeeping, auditing and accounting, and<br />

planning and administration. According to our interviews, the dearth of skilled staff was due to limited<br />

and irregular finances flowing from the central level for salary support. Thus, all but one state (Central<br />

Equatoria) has a functional director of planning. State <strong>health</strong> management committees are intended to<br />

form the backbone of planning, monitoring, and evaluation of state <strong>health</strong> activities; however, most<br />

states do not have functional committees that meet on a regular basis. In those states where<br />

committees do exist, the committee members are unclear of their roles, responsibilities, and mandate,<br />

and lack the critical management tools such as supervisory checklists to carry out their functions.<br />

During the war and its immediate aftermath, the weak capacity at the state level was mitigated by the<br />

fact that most <strong>health</strong> care was financed, managed, and delivered by independent NGOs. However,<br />

Southern Sudan is now in the process of transition, and development of the state-level management<br />

function is critical. The process of implementing the MDTF Umbrella Program for <strong>Health</strong> has recently<br />

begun to move rapidly, and a key part of the program involves contracting with NGOs and faith-based<br />

organizations (FBOs) to provide services. States will be responsible for managing these contracts to<br />

ensure appropriate delivery of PHC, including immunization; therefore, the development of management<br />

capacity is essential.<br />

County level<br />

One of the conclusions that emerged from Sudan’s first National <strong>Health</strong> Assembly was the critical role<br />

of the counties in implementing the BPHS strategy. Counties, being the closest unit to the <strong>health</strong><br />

facilities and to the communities, are responsible for supervising, monitoring, and guiding <strong>health</strong> service<br />

delivery. They also serve as the main vehicle to identify local needs, both at the facility and community<br />

level, to feed into the strategic planning process at the state level. Counties are to serve as the main<br />

implementing arm of the states, and will be critical in the day-to-day management of service delivery<br />

contracts with NGOs, FBOs, or other organizations at the facility level.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!