25.01.2015 Views

southern sudan health system assessment - Health Systems 20/20

southern sudan health system assessment - Health Systems 20/20

southern sudan health system assessment - Health Systems 20/20

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

figures into account and using a population base of 10 million, it is estimated that US$ 13 per capita was<br />

budgeted (though not necessarily disbursed) for <strong>health</strong> in <strong>20</strong>06 (see Figure 3). If these funds were all<br />

disbursed, this level of funding would be significantly more than many countries with similar per capita<br />

gross domestic product, especially among post-conflict countries. But a challenge faced by the MoH is to<br />

effectively coordinate those funds to ensure efficient use of resources. While this needs the<br />

commitment and cooperation of bilateral donors, NGOs, and UN agencies, the current needs are vast<br />

and beyond what is currently available.<br />

FIGURE 3: HEALTH SPENDING PER CAPITA IN <strong>20</strong>06 (US$)<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

$US per capita<br />

25<br />

<strong>20</strong><br />

15<br />

10<br />

Southern Sudan<br />

<strong>20</strong>06 estimate<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 100 <strong>20</strong>0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000<br />

per capita GDPt <strong>20</strong>00 ($US)<br />

The GoSS has declared that basic <strong>health</strong> and emergency services should be provided free of charge to all<br />

Southern Sudanese citizens. This declaration applies to all public facilities as well as NGO providers.<br />

However, our interviews with state officials and NGO representatives indicate that out-of-pocket<br />

expenses are commonplace.<br />

The World Bank estimates that government expenditure on <strong>health</strong> as a percentage of total public<br />

spending is approximately 8 percent, which is on par with other sub-Saharan countries.(World Bank<br />

<strong>20</strong>07) As Southern Sudan is emerging from a long history of civil war, <strong>health</strong> indicators are still markedly<br />

inferior than for the sub-Saharan region, despite the level of <strong>health</strong> spending.<br />

Many officials interviewed attributed Southern Sudan’s poor performance relative to sub-Saharan Africa<br />

as follows:<br />

1. The GoSS did not fulfill its pledge for Phase 1 of the project. US$ 8 million was deposited in the<br />

MDTF account of the US$ 40 million pledged.<br />

2. The NGO sector is providing care inefficiently, in an ad hoc and often vertical manner.<br />

3. Unit costs in Southern Sudan are much higher than in most neighboring countries.<br />

4. MoH resources have not been strategically allocated to strengthen PHC: “specialized materials and<br />

supplies” absorbed two-thirds of non-salary recurrent costs, and “scholarships” and “training”<br />

account for half of the remainder (World Bank <strong>20</strong>07).<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!