26.01.2015 Views

CAYMAN 2012 - HFMWeek

CAYMAN 2012 - HFMWeek

CAYMAN 2012 - HFMWeek

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CAYMAN</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

ACCOUNTA NCY<br />

1. Participating FFI<br />

2. Registered deemed-compliant FFI<br />

3. A non-registering local bank<br />

4. Restricted distributor<br />

Another requirement of a restricted fund is agreements<br />

that govern the distribution of the restricted fund’s debt<br />

or equity must prohibit the sale of fund interests to US<br />

persons, non-participating FFIs or non-foreign financial<br />

entities with one or more substantial (10% or more) US<br />

owners. A restricted fund will still have to perform certain<br />

due diligence on direct investors and change how it does<br />

business with its distributors based on the limitations of<br />

the sale of debt/equity.<br />

INTERGOVERNMENTAL APPROACH<br />

Concurrent with the release of the proposed Fatca regulations,<br />

a two-page joint statement was released indicating<br />

the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the<br />

United Kingdom were exploring an intergovernmental approach<br />

to Fatca compliance. The approach would require<br />

domestic tax information reporting which would be exchanged<br />

between participating countries.<br />

Given the current income tax regime in the Cayman<br />

Islands, the reciprocity offered by the intergovernmental<br />

approach would likely not yield any immediate direct benefits.<br />

However if such an approach is available one would<br />

speculate that the Cayman Islands would be inclined to<br />

contemplate and perhaps fully participate. The current<br />

Confidential Relationships (Preservation) Law (2009 Revision)<br />

is likely a significant hurdle Cayman Islands FFIs<br />

must navigate in any Fatca compliance strategy, though the<br />

intergovernmental approach may be part of the solution.<br />

It has been reported that the Cayman Islands Premier, the<br />

Honourable W. McKeeva Bush, OBE, JP, has announced<br />

future trips to Washington to continue talks with American<br />

officials about Fatca. The topic of intergovernmental<br />

reporting is likely to be on the agenda.<br />

COMPLIANCE<br />

There are many questions within the offshore investment<br />

fund industry regarding the party responsible for compliance.<br />

The proposed regulations indicate the FFI itself is re-<br />

quired to comply whether<br />

it is as a participating FFI,<br />

or a registered deemedcompliant<br />

FFI, or risk becoming<br />

a non-participating<br />

FFI and be subject to<br />

withholding.<br />

Each FFI must quickly<br />

determine if it can meet the<br />

requirements of a deemedcompliant<br />

FFI, and if failing<br />

to do so, whether the<br />

FFI will participate in<br />

Fatca compliance. Many<br />

in the industry are hopeful<br />

Cayman Islands regulated<br />

investment funds will<br />

qualify under either registered<br />

deemed-compliant<br />

category.<br />

Once an FFI determines its Fatca strategy as either a<br />

deemed-compliant FFI, participating FFI or non-participating<br />

FFI, it must begin to put the strategy into action.<br />

Among many regional and local fund administrators there<br />

seems to be an understanding the administrators will likely<br />

be eyed to assist in Fatca compliance though this may differ<br />

from fund to fund. Accordingly, fund administrators<br />

must begin to assess their own systems, processes, capabilities<br />

and capacities to ensure their ability to provide additional<br />

Fatca compliance services.<br />

Under the current proposed rules participating FFIs can<br />

enter into an FFI agreement online with the IRS starting<br />

1 January 2013. Furthermore for participating FFIs the<br />

responsible officer must certify to the IRS by 1 July 2013<br />

that the participating FFIs’ new account opening procedures<br />

are in place to identify US account holders. In general<br />

a deemed-compliant FFI would likely register with the<br />

IRS before withholding is scheduled to begin on 1 January<br />

2014. Given the imminent due dates for both, participating<br />

FFIs and deemed-compliant FFIs, discussions on Fatca<br />

compliance is a timely issue.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

While the proposed regulations may make it easier for<br />

certain offshore investment funds to be deemed-compliant,<br />

there still may be a significant number of offshore<br />

investment funds that do not qualify for this category<br />

and will therefore need to become a participating<br />

FFI or be subject to the withholding. Assistance may be<br />

required by each FFI in its deemed-compliant determination<br />

as well as registration and compliance with the<br />

administrative burdens thereafter. Similarly FFIs who<br />

become participating FFIs may also require assistance<br />

with its FFI agreement, certification process, and ongoing<br />

documentation and informational reporting. Lastly,<br />

the intergovernmental approach is an intriguing option<br />

and should be monitored as the approach evolves from<br />

its current joint statement status. The threat of a 30%<br />

withholding tax is too significant for offshore investment<br />

funds to delay an inevitable Fatca compliance<br />

strategy as either a deemed-compliant FFI or participating<br />

FFI. n<br />

40 HFMWEEK.COM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!