28.01.2015 Views

Mpanga/Kipengere Game Reserve - Frontier-publications.co.uk

Mpanga/Kipengere Game Reserve - Frontier-publications.co.uk

Mpanga/Kipengere Game Reserve - Frontier-publications.co.uk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mpanga</strong> / <strong>Kipengere</strong> <strong>Game</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>; A Biodiversity Survey<br />

3.2 Fauna<br />

• Sherman traps<br />

Sherman traps (90mm x 80mm x 230mm) were used to survey the small mammal fauna of the reserve. At<br />

each main camp 50 traps were set for 8 nights. During the dry season phase each satellite camp used 8 traps<br />

which were set for 3 nights, whilst the wet season phase, teams used 25 traps for 4 nights. Traps were<br />

placed within different habitats and micro-habitats at each ‘trapsite’ and detailed habitat notes and location<br />

details were taken for each trap. Traps were baited with fried <strong>co</strong><strong>co</strong>nut and peanut butter and set before dusk<br />

each day. In the highest altitude sites grass and bracken was put in the trap as an insulator for any animals<br />

that might be captured. Traps were checked early in the morning and data regarding the capture of any<br />

animals and details of the individuals involved was re<strong>co</strong>rded on standardised data sheets. This included<br />

preliminary identification, sex, weight, biometrics and pelage <strong>co</strong>lour. If not taken as specimens, animals<br />

were marked by clipping a small area of fur in a given pattern and released unharmed.<br />

• Bucket pitfall drift fence<br />

During the wet season phase of work, one bucket pitfall trap line with a drift fence was in<strong>co</strong>rporated in to<br />

the main zoological worksite. The aim was to try to target more systematically the amphibian and reptile<br />

populations, as well as that of small mammals, in particular shrews. One 50m linear transect was created<br />

whereby eleven 10 litre plastic buckets, spaced 5 m apart, were sunk into the ground with their rims flush<br />

to ground level. A sheet of vertical plastic (approximately 0.5m high) was run along the bucket line<br />

crossing the centre of each bucket to form a ‘drift fence’. Animals moving into the area from either side<br />

would be channelled along the plastic towards the bucket traps. Traps were checked early each morning for<br />

the duration of the trapsite period and data regarding the identification of each animal captured was<br />

re<strong>co</strong>rded on standardised data sheets.<br />

• Animal sign transects<br />

In order to survey larger and more cryptic animals, dung, tracks or other animal signs were re<strong>co</strong>rded along<br />

a 4m wide 200m long transect. Transects were arranged randomly throughout the reserve, starting in<br />

representative habitats and following a bearing selected by throwing a stick and following the direction in<br />

which it pointed. The bearing was kept using a <strong>co</strong>mpass and the transect <strong>co</strong>mpleted in four 50m sections,<br />

each temporarily demarcated by a length of rope. Data were re<strong>co</strong>rded on standard re<strong>co</strong>rding forms that<br />

included the altitude and habitat of all transects. (These transects doubled as those to survey signs of human<br />

resource-use).<br />

• Bat netting<br />

Mist-nets were used to survey the bat fauna of the reserve. A variety of sizes of nets (3m, 6m, 9m and 12m<br />

long) were erected in various formations, generally along predicted bat flight-paths such as animal paths,<br />

rivers and streams. Detailed habitat notes and location details were taken for each net. Nets were opened at<br />

dusk for varying lengths of time during which they were checked every 15 minutes. Data regarding the<br />

capture of any animals and details of the individuals involved were re<strong>co</strong>rded on standard re<strong>co</strong>rding forms.<br />

This included preliminary identification, sex, weight, biometrics and pelage <strong>co</strong>lour. If not taken as<br />

specimens, animals were released unharmed.<br />

• Bird survey<br />

Bird surveys were <strong>co</strong>nducted between dawn and dusk using a <strong>co</strong>mbination of sight, mist-nets and calls.<br />

Binoculars (8 x 42mm) and teles<strong>co</strong>pe (20 x 60) were used in direct observations. A <strong>co</strong>mbination of up to<br />

eight 9m and 12m long mist-nets were erected in various formations and opened from dawn until dusk for<br />

two days at each study site. Nets were checked every 30 minutes and birds were released unharmed after<br />

re<strong>co</strong>rding the identification, sex and age. No timed point-<strong>co</strong>unts or transects were used. An ornithologist<br />

was employed to implement these surveys and re<strong>co</strong>rd all species identified. Casual lists were also <strong>co</strong>llected<br />

by the field team and have been added to the bird list produced by the ornithologist. These are clearly<br />

marked as additional sightings in Appendix 9.<br />

• Timed man-hour searches<br />

The reptile and amphibian fauna of the reserve was surveyed through timed searches. Searches were<br />

<strong>co</strong>nducted during both the day and night and were of various lengths, with various numbers of survey<br />

<strong>Frontier</strong> Tanzania Environmental Research Report 99<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!