28.01.2015 Views

LEGISLATIVE STEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Wacounties.org

LEGISLATIVE STEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Wacounties.org

LEGISLATIVE STEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Wacounties.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Public Outreach Campaign Plan for consideration and approval. Those recommendations are included in<br />

separate documents.<br />

Finance and Reform Workgroups<br />

The Finance and Reform Workgroups continued to work through the summer. The Reform Workgroup<br />

reached consensus of several key issues concerning the structure of the reform agenda. They concluded that<br />

the agenda should have a narrow focus and have a clear set of limited priorities. The workgroup also<br />

developed a set of criteria to consider when determining whether or not a reform idea should be a WSAC<br />

priority:<br />

1. Likelihood to achieve a meaningful policy change. Factors include, political opportunity, potential<br />

savings/efficiency for counties and state, and timeliness of issue<br />

2. Yields greatest result for greatest number of counties<br />

3. Number of counties that would utilize proposed reform<br />

4. Alignment with WASC's mission and policy statement<br />

Public records, liability, and personnel reform all ranked very high on the workgroup members' list of reform<br />

ideas. The results of this exercise confirmed the input from the WSAC survey as well as the preliminary work<br />

done during the May LSC retreat.<br />

The Finance Workgroup met twice by phone after the retreat. Staff provided a list of budget and finance ideas<br />

that WSAC has considered over the last several years. The workgroup recommended that the LSC place<br />

ideas into tiers in order to focus our efforts.<br />

Similar to the Reform Workgroup, the Finance Workgroup went through an exercise to rank ideas, using the<br />

same criteria. We did not receive a particularly large number of responses to this request, and several<br />

members utilized inconsistent ranking approaches. This made it difficult to draw strong conclusions from the<br />

ranking process. However, based on this exercise, the following ideas rose to the top:<br />

1. Flexibility to use permit fees for long-term planning<br />

2. Flexibility to use Public Works Trust Fund for a broader range of capital projects<br />

3. New transportation/transit funding<br />

4. Increasing the 101% property tax limit by tying it to inflation<br />

A Framework for WSAC’s Legislative Agenda<br />

Over the course of our work this interim a consistent message has emerged: our legislative approach should<br />

more clearly delineate which proposals have a high likelihood of being achieved in the short term, and which<br />

items required greater stakeholder and legislative work. There is a strong desire that we integrate a<br />

communications and education strategy into our legislative approach, so that we are building support for our<br />

priorities over time.<br />

Our recommendation for this approach is described in more detail in the attached Framework document. The<br />

document separates issues identified by the Finance and Reform Workgroups into those that are ready for<br />

immediate action in the 2013 legislative session, and those that require concerted effort over time. It also<br />

identifies the types of strategies and tactics we intend to employ to build stakeholder and legislative support for<br />

the issues that are not ready for immediate success.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!