STUDENT RESEaRch SympoSiUm 2010 - Graduate and Research ...
STUDENT RESEaRch SympoSiUm 2010 - Graduate and Research ...
STUDENT RESEaRch SympoSiUm 2010 - Graduate and Research ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
104<br />
AbstrActs<br />
when using thin (micrometer) analyte cells, high spatial resolution<br />
levels suitable for capillary flow cells <strong>and</strong> microfluidic systems,<br />
<strong>and</strong> remote st<strong>and</strong>off detection capability. In a typical wave-mixing<br />
optical setup, two input laser beams are focused <strong>and</strong> mixed inside<br />
the sample to create dynamic gratings. The incoming photons are<br />
then scattered off these gratings to create a signal beam that is<br />
characteristic of the analyte. Since the signal beam is a coherent<br />
laser-like beam, the optical detection efficiency is very high<br />
<strong>and</strong> the signal-to-noise ratio is excellent. Since the signal beam<br />
has its own propagation direction, one can use effective spatial<br />
filters to minimize optical background noise levels. Wave-mixing<br />
detection sensitivity levels are comparable or better than those<br />
of fluorescence-based methods, <strong>and</strong> yet, wave mixing can be<br />
used for both fluorescing <strong>and</strong> non-fluorescing analytes, <strong>and</strong> many<br />
analytes could be detected in their native form. The wave-mixing<br />
signal has a quadratic dependence on analyte concentration,<br />
<strong>and</strong> hence, small changes in analyte properties result in more<br />
dramatic changes in the wave-mixing signal.<br />
#192 12:30–2:00<br />
Identification <strong>and</strong> Quantification of the Biosynthetic Genes<br />
of the Photoactive Siderophore, Vibrioferrin, in the North<br />
Atlantic <strong>and</strong> its Impact on Algal Iron Acquisition<br />
Lyndsay Trimble, Chemistry (U)<br />
Carl Carrano, Chemistry<br />
Algal-bacterial interactions are a common <strong>and</strong> important process<br />
in the marine environment. These diverse interactions include<br />
involvement in nutrient exchange, cell differentiation, <strong>and</strong> algicidal<br />
effects. However, with few exceptions, these interactions are<br />
poorly understood. One particular nutrient element which could be<br />
involved in such interactions is iron, which is important due to its<br />
role in photosynthesis <strong>and</strong> cellular respiration. Iron, though abundant<br />
in the earth’s crust, is not readily available due to its poor<br />
solubility in the marine environment. Previously it has been shown<br />
that in response to iron limitation, algal-associated heterotrophic<br />
marine bacteria belonging to the Marinobacter genus produce<br />
an iron complexing agent, known as vibrioferrin (VF). Iron-bound<br />
VF undergoes a photochemical reaction that provides a highly<br />
bioavailable form of iron to both the producing bacteria <strong>and</strong> the<br />
algal partner. In order to assess the importance of VF in mediating<br />
bacterial-algal interactions in the environment, quantitative realtime<br />
PCR (qPCR) has been utilized to identify <strong>and</strong> quantify the<br />
presence of genes involved in the biosynthesis of VF in the North<br />
Atlantic. These genes are found only in the euphotic zone <strong>and</strong><br />
below the deep chlorophyll maxima highlighting the significance<br />
of VF photochemistry <strong>and</strong> its potential influence on phytoplankton<br />
<strong>and</strong> bacterial growth.<br />
<strong>STUDENT</strong> RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM <strong>2010</strong><br />
#193 12:30–2:00<br />
Mechanism of TBP Recruitment to the TATA-less U1<br />
Promoter<br />
Jinjoo Kang, Chemistry & Biochemistry (M)<br />
William Stumph, Chemistry & Biochemistry<br />
Transcription of Drosophila U1 or U6 snRNAs by RNA polymerases<br />
II <strong>and</strong> III respectively requires a conserved DNA promoter sequence<br />
termed the proximal sequence element A (PSEA), which<br />
is recognized by DmSNAPc, a multi-protein complex. Interestingly,<br />
the RNA polymerase specificity of Drosophila snRNA genes<br />
is determined by only five base pairs differences between the U1<br />
<strong>and</strong> U6 gene PSEAs. Considerable work in our lab has demonstrated<br />
that DmSNAPc binds to a U1 PSEA in a different conformation<br />
compared to when it binds to U6 PSEA. Further work<br />
suggests that DmSNAPc, when it binds to a U1 PSEA, recruits the<br />
TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the TATA-less U1 promoter. Finally,<br />
we believe that TBP interacts specifically with the PSEB, a second<br />
conserved non-TATA element in the U1 promoter. My work<br />
is designed to gather evidence to support these hypotheses. TBP<br />
was co-overexpressed in Drosophila tissue culture cells together<br />
with the three protein subunits of DmSNAPc. The 6X His –tagged<br />
TBP <strong>and</strong> DmSNAPc were co-purified by Ni 2+ column affinity<br />
chromatography. When used in a b<strong>and</strong>-shift assay with wild-type<br />
U1 promoter DNA, two shifted b<strong>and</strong>s were observed. Both b<strong>and</strong>s<br />
could be supershifted with antibodies against DmSNAPc, but<br />
only the upper b<strong>and</strong> was supershifted by antibodies against TBP.<br />
No shifted b<strong>and</strong>s were observed with TBP alone in the absence<br />
if DmSNAPc. Because both DmSNAPc <strong>and</strong> TBP were present in<br />
the upper b<strong>and</strong>, these results suggest that DmSNAPc can recruit<br />
TBP to the U1 promoter. To gain further insight into whether TBP<br />
interacts directly with the PSEB, DNA probes were prepared that<br />
contained either a mutant PSEB or a TATA element replacing the<br />
PSEB. When the PSEB was mutated, the upper TBP-containing<br />
b<strong>and</strong> was significantly decreased. However, the upper b<strong>and</strong> was<br />
increased when the PSEB was changed to a TATA sequence.<br />
These results suggest that TBP may directly interact with the<br />
PSEB. My results indicate that DmSNAPc is involved in the<br />
recruitment of TBP to the TATA-less U1 promoter, <strong>and</strong> that the<br />
PSEB stabilizes the recruitment of complexes that contain both<br />
DmSNAPc <strong>and</strong> TBP.