14.11.2012 Views

STUDENT RESEaRch SympoSiUm 2010 - Graduate and Research ...

STUDENT RESEaRch SympoSiUm 2010 - Graduate and Research ...

STUDENT RESEaRch SympoSiUm 2010 - Graduate and Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104<br />

AbstrActs<br />

when using thin (micrometer) analyte cells, high spatial resolution<br />

levels suitable for capillary flow cells <strong>and</strong> microfluidic systems,<br />

<strong>and</strong> remote st<strong>and</strong>off detection capability. In a typical wave-mixing<br />

optical setup, two input laser beams are focused <strong>and</strong> mixed inside<br />

the sample to create dynamic gratings. The incoming photons are<br />

then scattered off these gratings to create a signal beam that is<br />

characteristic of the analyte. Since the signal beam is a coherent<br />

laser-like beam, the optical detection efficiency is very high<br />

<strong>and</strong> the signal-to-noise ratio is excellent. Since the signal beam<br />

has its own propagation direction, one can use effective spatial<br />

filters to minimize optical background noise levels. Wave-mixing<br />

detection sensitivity levels are comparable or better than those<br />

of fluorescence-based methods, <strong>and</strong> yet, wave mixing can be<br />

used for both fluorescing <strong>and</strong> non-fluorescing analytes, <strong>and</strong> many<br />

analytes could be detected in their native form. The wave-mixing<br />

signal has a quadratic dependence on analyte concentration,<br />

<strong>and</strong> hence, small changes in analyte properties result in more<br />

dramatic changes in the wave-mixing signal.<br />

#192 12:30–2:00<br />

Identification <strong>and</strong> Quantification of the Biosynthetic Genes<br />

of the Photoactive Siderophore, Vibrioferrin, in the North<br />

Atlantic <strong>and</strong> its Impact on Algal Iron Acquisition<br />

Lyndsay Trimble, Chemistry (U)<br />

Carl Carrano, Chemistry<br />

Algal-bacterial interactions are a common <strong>and</strong> important process<br />

in the marine environment. These diverse interactions include<br />

involvement in nutrient exchange, cell differentiation, <strong>and</strong> algicidal<br />

effects. However, with few exceptions, these interactions are<br />

poorly understood. One particular nutrient element which could be<br />

involved in such interactions is iron, which is important due to its<br />

role in photosynthesis <strong>and</strong> cellular respiration. Iron, though abundant<br />

in the earth’s crust, is not readily available due to its poor<br />

solubility in the marine environment. Previously it has been shown<br />

that in response to iron limitation, algal-associated heterotrophic<br />

marine bacteria belonging to the Marinobacter genus produce<br />

an iron complexing agent, known as vibrioferrin (VF). Iron-bound<br />

VF undergoes a photochemical reaction that provides a highly<br />

bioavailable form of iron to both the producing bacteria <strong>and</strong> the<br />

algal partner. In order to assess the importance of VF in mediating<br />

bacterial-algal interactions in the environment, quantitative realtime<br />

PCR (qPCR) has been utilized to identify <strong>and</strong> quantify the<br />

presence of genes involved in the biosynthesis of VF in the North<br />

Atlantic. These genes are found only in the euphotic zone <strong>and</strong><br />

below the deep chlorophyll maxima highlighting the significance<br />

of VF photochemistry <strong>and</strong> its potential influence on phytoplankton<br />

<strong>and</strong> bacterial growth.<br />

<strong>STUDENT</strong> RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM <strong>2010</strong><br />

#193 12:30–2:00<br />

Mechanism of TBP Recruitment to the TATA-less U1<br />

Promoter<br />

Jinjoo Kang, Chemistry & Biochemistry (M)<br />

William Stumph, Chemistry & Biochemistry<br />

Transcription of Drosophila U1 or U6 snRNAs by RNA polymerases<br />

II <strong>and</strong> III respectively requires a conserved DNA promoter sequence<br />

termed the proximal sequence element A (PSEA), which<br />

is recognized by DmSNAPc, a multi-protein complex. Interestingly,<br />

the RNA polymerase specificity of Drosophila snRNA genes<br />

is determined by only five base pairs differences between the U1<br />

<strong>and</strong> U6 gene PSEAs. Considerable work in our lab has demonstrated<br />

that DmSNAPc binds to a U1 PSEA in a different conformation<br />

compared to when it binds to U6 PSEA. Further work<br />

suggests that DmSNAPc, when it binds to a U1 PSEA, recruits the<br />

TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the TATA-less U1 promoter. Finally,<br />

we believe that TBP interacts specifically with the PSEB, a second<br />

conserved non-TATA element in the U1 promoter. My work<br />

is designed to gather evidence to support these hypotheses. TBP<br />

was co-overexpressed in Drosophila tissue culture cells together<br />

with the three protein subunits of DmSNAPc. The 6X His –tagged<br />

TBP <strong>and</strong> DmSNAPc were co-purified by Ni 2+ column affinity<br />

chromatography. When used in a b<strong>and</strong>-shift assay with wild-type<br />

U1 promoter DNA, two shifted b<strong>and</strong>s were observed. Both b<strong>and</strong>s<br />

could be supershifted with antibodies against DmSNAPc, but<br />

only the upper b<strong>and</strong> was supershifted by antibodies against TBP.<br />

No shifted b<strong>and</strong>s were observed with TBP alone in the absence<br />

if DmSNAPc. Because both DmSNAPc <strong>and</strong> TBP were present in<br />

the upper b<strong>and</strong>, these results suggest that DmSNAPc can recruit<br />

TBP to the U1 promoter. To gain further insight into whether TBP<br />

interacts directly with the PSEB, DNA probes were prepared that<br />

contained either a mutant PSEB or a TATA element replacing the<br />

PSEB. When the PSEB was mutated, the upper TBP-containing<br />

b<strong>and</strong> was significantly decreased. However, the upper b<strong>and</strong> was<br />

increased when the PSEB was changed to a TATA sequence.<br />

These results suggest that TBP may directly interact with the<br />

PSEB. My results indicate that DmSNAPc is involved in the<br />

recruitment of TBP to the TATA-less U1 promoter, <strong>and</strong> that the<br />

PSEB stabilizes the recruitment of complexes that contain both<br />

DmSNAPc <strong>and</strong> TBP.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!