30.01.2015 Views

of self regulation? - The Law Society of Upper Canada

of self regulation? - The Law Society of Upper Canada

of self regulation? - The Law Society of Upper Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A look at the <strong>regulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> the legal pr<strong>of</strong>ession throughout common law countries<br />

confirms that pure <strong>self</strong>-<strong>regulation</strong> has increasingly become an endangered species. It<br />

appears, in fact, that <strong>Canada</strong> may soon be the only country in the Commonwealth where<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>ession remains <strong>self</strong>-governing. <strong>The</strong> type <strong>of</strong> regulatory intervention and the degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> authority lost by the pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies varies among jurisdictions. Some common<br />

threads are apparent, however. In most cases an independent regulatory agency has been<br />

created, one which is appointed not by the law society (or its equivalent) but by the<br />

government. Frequently the state reclaims responsibility for complaints handling and<br />

discipline and assigns it to this body, 79 but leaves the law society to establish codes <strong>of</strong><br />

conduct and standards <strong>of</strong> practice, and even to govern admissions and qualification.<br />

Finally, the new mechanisms that are introduced <strong>of</strong>ten provide for significant lay<br />

participation in the disciplinary process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> various jurisdictions <strong>of</strong> Australia and the United Kingdom are leading the<br />

charge against <strong>self</strong>-<strong>regulation</strong>, with other jurisdictions following close on their heels. In<br />

Australia, reforms to the <strong>regulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ession have been unfolding for more than a<br />

decade. Because the legal pr<strong>of</strong>ession is regulated at the state, rather than the federal level,<br />

the regulatory structures are not traditionally uniform. Part <strong>of</strong> the reforms involves an<br />

effort to unify the regulatory systems across the country, and to improve the mobility <strong>of</strong><br />

lawyers. 80 <strong>The</strong> reforms are otherwise broadly similar: in most states the reforms provide<br />

for an independent, government-appointed body to handle the complaints and discipline<br />

79 In many cases, different types <strong>of</strong> complaints are handled differently, with the independent body taking<br />

responsibility for conduct complaints for example, while the law society retains (though <strong>of</strong>ten under<br />

supervision) jurisdiction over quality <strong>of</strong> service complaints, and the courts jurisdiction over civil claims<br />

against lawyers.<br />

80 See <strong>Law</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> Australia, “National Legal Pr<strong>of</strong>ession Model Bill” online:<br />

.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!