30.01.2015 Views

Technology, R&D, and Efficiency - McGraw-Hill Higher Education

Technology, R&D, and Efficiency - McGraw-Hill Higher Education

Technology, R&D, and Efficiency - McGraw-Hill Higher Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 11W<br />

<strong>Technology</strong>, R&D, <strong>and</strong> Effi ciency 11W-3<br />

In 1996 Palm introduced its Palm Pilot, a palm-size personal<br />

computer. Microsoft, H<strong>and</strong>spring, OmniSky, <strong>and</strong> other<br />

firms soon brought out similar products.<br />

Other recent examples: Early successful cholesterolreducing<br />

drugs (statins) such as Bristol-Myers Squibb’s<br />

Provochol were soon followed by chemically distinct but<br />

similar statins such as Merck’s Zocor <strong>and</strong> Pfizer’s Lipitor.<br />

Early video game consoles such as those by Atari eventually<br />

gave rise to more popular consoles by Nintendo (Wii), Sony<br />

(PlayStation), <strong>and</strong> Microsoft (Xbox). MySpace, Facebook,<br />

<strong>and</strong> LinkedIn mimicked the social networking innovation<br />

pioneered by Classmates.com.<br />

In each of these cases, other firms incorporated the<br />

new innovation into their own business <strong>and</strong> products<br />

through imitation, modification, <strong>and</strong> extension. The original<br />

innovation thus became commonplace <strong>and</strong> mainly of<br />

historical interest.<br />

Although not as dramatic as invention <strong>and</strong> innovation,<br />

diffusion is a critical element of technological change.<br />

R&D Expenditures<br />

As related to businesses , the term “research <strong>and</strong> development”<br />

is used loosely to include direct efforts toward invention,<br />

innovation, <strong>and</strong> diffusion. However, government also engages<br />

in R&D, particularly R&D having to do with national<br />

defense. In 2006 total U.S. R&D expenditures (business<br />

plus government) were $343 billion. Relative to GDP that<br />

amount was about 2.6 percent, which is a reasonable measure<br />

of the emphasis the U.S. economy puts on technological<br />

advance. As shown in Global Perspective 11W.1, this is a<br />

high percentage of GDP compared to several other nations.<br />

American businesses spent $242 billion on R&D in 2006.<br />

Figure 11W.1 shows how these R&D expenditures were<br />

allocated. Observe that U.S. firms collectively channeled<br />

74 percent of their R&D expenditures to “development”<br />

(innovation <strong>and</strong> imitation, the route to diffusion). They<br />

spent another 22 percent on applied research, or on pursuing<br />

invention. For reasons we will mention later, only 4 percent<br />

of business R&D expenditures went for basic research, the<br />

search for general scientific principles. Of course, industries,<br />

<strong>and</strong> firms within industries, vary greatly in the amount of<br />

emphasis they place on these three processes.<br />

Modern View of Technological<br />

Advance<br />

For decades most economists regarded technological advance<br />

as being external to the economy—a r<strong>and</strong>om outside<br />

force to which the economy adjusted. From time to time<br />

fortuitous advances in scientific <strong>and</strong> technological knowledge<br />

occurred, paving the way for major new products<br />

GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE 11W.1<br />

Total R&D Expenditures as a Percentage of GDP,<br />

Selected Nations<br />

Relative R&D spending varies among leading industrial nations.<br />

From a microeconomic perspective, R&D helps promote economic<br />

efficiency; from a macroeconomic perspective, R&D helps<br />

promote economic growth.<br />

FIGURE 11W.1 The composition of business<br />

R&D outlays in the United States, 2006. Firms<br />

channel the bulk of their R&D spending to innovation <strong>and</strong><br />

imitation, because both have direct commercial value; less<br />

to applied research, that is, invention; <strong>and</strong> a relatively small<br />

amount to basic scientific research.<br />

Basic<br />

research<br />

4%<br />

Sweden<br />

Japan<br />

United States<br />

Germany<br />

France<br />

Canada<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Italy<br />

Russia<br />

Total R&D Expenditures<br />

as Percentage of GDP, 2006<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Source: National Science Foundation, www.nsf.gov, <strong>and</strong> Organization for Economic<br />

Cooperation <strong>and</strong> Development, www.oecd.org.<br />

(automobiles, airplanes) <strong>and</strong> new production processes<br />

(assembly lines). Firms <strong>and</strong> industries, each at its own pace,<br />

then incorporated the new technology into their products<br />

Applied<br />

research<br />

(invention)<br />

22%<br />

Development<br />

(innovation <strong>and</strong><br />

imitation)<br />

74%<br />

Source: National Science Foundation, www.nsf.gov.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!