31.01.2015 Views

MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD - the Parliamentary and ...

MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD - the Parliamentary and ...

MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD - the Parliamentary and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.1 Claire Forbes introduced <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder Engagement Strategy which set out<br />

PHSO’s approach to building <strong>and</strong> developing relationships with organisations<br />

with which PHSO wished to have an ongoing professional relationship.<br />

9.2 EB noted <strong>the</strong> priorities detailed in <strong>the</strong> Strategy for 2011-12 but set <strong>the</strong>se aside<br />

pending <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong> current business planning process.<br />

9.3 Claire Forbes explained <strong>the</strong> Strategy’s approach <strong>and</strong> highlighted <strong>the</strong><br />

importance of bringing knowledge toge<strong>the</strong>r to develop a framework for<br />

communicating effectively. EB noted <strong>the</strong> existing <strong>and</strong> future workstreams.<br />

9.4 The risks associated with this Strategy would be reviewed as part of <strong>the</strong><br />

discussion on <strong>the</strong> Strategic Risk review on 14 March.<br />

9.5 EB approved <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder Engagement Strategy 2011-15.<br />

PHSO Stakeholder Data Strategy 2011-15<br />

9.6 EB reviewed <strong>the</strong> Strategy which detailed a policy on how PHSO would collect,<br />

store <strong>and</strong> manage stakeholder data. The proposal was to procure a database<br />

solution which would allow for all stakeholder contact data to be stored in one<br />

location. The Communications Division would have responsibility for delivering<br />

this Strategy.<br />

9.7 EB approved <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder Data Strategy 2011-15.<br />

10. PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SYSTEM (PDRS) QUALITY<br />

ASSURANCE<br />

10.1 Ros Green <strong>and</strong> Julie Fisher-Jones presented a paper which informed EB of <strong>the</strong><br />

outcome of <strong>the</strong> quality assurance exercise which was carried out on <strong>the</strong><br />

Mid Year PDRS [Performance Development <strong>and</strong> Review System] reviews.<br />

10.2 EB noted <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> report <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcomes of <strong>the</strong> assessment. There<br />

were a couple of areas for improvement, but overall, <strong>the</strong> results displayed<br />

improvement in quality from last year.<br />

10.3 EB agreed <strong>the</strong> recommendation that <strong>the</strong> PDRS guidance would be kept under<br />

review during <strong>the</strong> year as <strong>the</strong> new system was implemented, <strong>and</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

guidance would be issued if necessary.<br />

10.4 EB agreed <strong>the</strong> quality assurance report would be communicated to staff<br />

through <strong>the</strong> Senior Management Team (SMT).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!