MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD - the Parliamentary and ...
MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD - the Parliamentary and ...
MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD - the Parliamentary and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9.1 Claire Forbes introduced <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder Engagement Strategy which set out<br />
PHSO’s approach to building <strong>and</strong> developing relationships with organisations<br />
with which PHSO wished to have an ongoing professional relationship.<br />
9.2 EB noted <strong>the</strong> priorities detailed in <strong>the</strong> Strategy for 2011-12 but set <strong>the</strong>se aside<br />
pending <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong> current business planning process.<br />
9.3 Claire Forbes explained <strong>the</strong> Strategy’s approach <strong>and</strong> highlighted <strong>the</strong><br />
importance of bringing knowledge toge<strong>the</strong>r to develop a framework for<br />
communicating effectively. EB noted <strong>the</strong> existing <strong>and</strong> future workstreams.<br />
9.4 The risks associated with this Strategy would be reviewed as part of <strong>the</strong><br />
discussion on <strong>the</strong> Strategic Risk review on 14 March.<br />
9.5 EB approved <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder Engagement Strategy 2011-15.<br />
PHSO Stakeholder Data Strategy 2011-15<br />
9.6 EB reviewed <strong>the</strong> Strategy which detailed a policy on how PHSO would collect,<br />
store <strong>and</strong> manage stakeholder data. The proposal was to procure a database<br />
solution which would allow for all stakeholder contact data to be stored in one<br />
location. The Communications Division would have responsibility for delivering<br />
this Strategy.<br />
9.7 EB approved <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder Data Strategy 2011-15.<br />
10. PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SYSTEM (PDRS) QUALITY<br />
ASSURANCE<br />
10.1 Ros Green <strong>and</strong> Julie Fisher-Jones presented a paper which informed EB of <strong>the</strong><br />
outcome of <strong>the</strong> quality assurance exercise which was carried out on <strong>the</strong><br />
Mid Year PDRS [Performance Development <strong>and</strong> Review System] reviews.<br />
10.2 EB noted <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> report <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcomes of <strong>the</strong> assessment. There<br />
were a couple of areas for improvement, but overall, <strong>the</strong> results displayed<br />
improvement in quality from last year.<br />
10.3 EB agreed <strong>the</strong> recommendation that <strong>the</strong> PDRS guidance would be kept under<br />
review during <strong>the</strong> year as <strong>the</strong> new system was implemented, <strong>and</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
guidance would be issued if necessary.<br />
10.4 EB agreed <strong>the</strong> quality assurance report would be communicated to staff<br />
through <strong>the</strong> Senior Management Team (SMT).