31.01.2015 Views

What were The Nephilims in Relationship to the Sons of God

What were The Nephilims in Relationship to the Sons of God

What were The Nephilims in Relationship to the Sons of God

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>What</strong> was <strong>the</strong> relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nephilims</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> .<br />

This is what suppose <strong>to</strong> be a fallen angel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> planet<br />

Nibiru, <strong>the</strong> real truth, you have <strong>to</strong> referred your selves <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Bible or passages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible below, this scenario<br />

repeats it self every 3.657 years that Nibiru returns <strong>to</strong><br />

put order <strong>in</strong> this corrupted planet, <strong>the</strong> Bible give us a<br />

clear view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcome, "Money will be <strong>the</strong> destruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> man" and <strong>in</strong> that path we’re go<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong>re’s no justice <strong>in</strong><br />

any country, see what k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> justice gives us <strong>the</strong><br />

European Court <strong>of</strong> Humans Rights , it’s a scheme, if you<br />

depose compla<strong>in</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st a country <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Union<br />

for heav<strong>in</strong>g violated you legal rights, <strong>in</strong> this Site are few<br />

examples, more than half a million €uros that <strong>the</strong><br />

Belgian Government owns me still, three compla<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Belgium Government <strong>were</strong> depose before <strong>the</strong><br />

European Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights <strong>in</strong> Strasbourg (France)<br />

on <strong>the</strong> 3 rd <strong>of</strong> March 2008, all <strong>the</strong> three compla<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>were</strong><br />

thrown <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> rubbish b<strong>in</strong>, 90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> compla<strong>in</strong>ts that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Europeans citizens depose <strong>in</strong> Strasbourg (France)<br />

before <strong>the</strong> European Court <strong>of</strong> Humans Rights are thrown<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> rubbish b<strong>in</strong>, this gives you a little idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

scheme <strong>of</strong> this court, <strong>the</strong>y are corrupted until <strong>the</strong> bone,<br />

Europe will come down like Babylonia did <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past !.<br />

If <strong>the</strong>re is one idea <strong>in</strong> some Christian circles that has always puzzled me, it is <strong>the</strong> idea that when<br />

Genesis chapter 6 speaks about <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g wives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> men, it was somehow<br />

referr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> angels, or heavenly be<strong>in</strong>gs mat<strong>in</strong>g with human women. It amazes me that not only is such<br />

an idea is unequivocally accepted by many <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church, but that it is also put forth by some<br />

<strong>the</strong>ologians. In this brief study, we will take a look at what <strong>God</strong> says, and <strong>the</strong> Biblical def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

terms. Because ra<strong>the</strong>r than come up with our own private <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>of</strong> scripture, it is <strong>in</strong>cumbent<br />

upon all <strong>of</strong> us <strong>to</strong> study <strong>the</strong> scriptures circumspectly and let <strong>God</strong>'s word itself tell us what is <strong>in</strong> view.<br />

Compar<strong>in</strong>g spiritual th<strong>in</strong>gs with spiritual believes, <strong>God</strong> reveals <strong>the</strong> truth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passages <strong>in</strong> question.<br />

Genesis 6: 1.<br />

• "And it came <strong>to</strong> pass, when men began <strong>to</strong> multiply on <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth, and daughters <strong>were</strong><br />

born un<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> saw <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> men that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> fair and <strong>the</strong>y <strong>to</strong>ok<br />

<strong>the</strong>m wives <strong>of</strong> all which <strong>the</strong>y chose".<br />

<strong>The</strong> first question we need <strong>to</strong> tackle is, who are <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> spoken <strong>of</strong> here . And not who does<br />

this prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>the</strong>ologian say <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> are, or who we might suppose <strong>the</strong>y are, but what do we<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d out about <strong>the</strong> phrase when we search scripture. <strong>The</strong> only way <strong>to</strong> authoritatively f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> answer <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> "Who Were <strong>The</strong> <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>", is <strong>to</strong> let <strong>God</strong> tell us, and He does tell us very clearly !.<br />

John 1: 12.<br />

• "But as many as received Him, <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m gave He power <strong>to</strong> become <strong>the</strong> "<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>", even <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m<br />

that believeth on His name".<br />

Romans 8: 14.<br />

• "For as many as are led by <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>".


This gives us scriptural warrant <strong>to</strong> say <strong>the</strong><br />

sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> are believers. And <strong>in</strong>deed, <strong>the</strong><br />

overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

phrase unquestionably refer <strong>to</strong> believers or<br />

<strong>God</strong>'s Covenant people. And those few<br />

passages <strong>in</strong> which it can be said <strong>to</strong> be<br />

questionable, when studied carefully, <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

referr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> people <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> also.<br />

By contrast, <strong>the</strong>re is no authoritative use <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> phrase "<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>" for Angels <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Bible. Why <strong>the</strong>n should we listen <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

suppositions <strong>of</strong> men, when we have <strong>the</strong><br />

unadulterated word <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> <strong>to</strong> exegete .<br />

All <strong>God</strong>'s covenant people are spoken <strong>of</strong> as<br />

<strong>the</strong> sons, or <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. This is <strong>the</strong><br />

phrase that <strong>God</strong> has signified <strong>to</strong> identify those<br />

who are <strong>of</strong> His family. Angels don't qualify. It<br />

is by <strong>the</strong> blood <strong>of</strong> Christ that true believers<br />

become sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> !.<br />

1 st John 3: 1.<br />

• "Behold, what manner <strong>of</strong> Love <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r hath bes<strong>to</strong>wed upon us, that we should be called <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>:..."<br />

All <strong>God</strong>'s people are <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. Look<strong>in</strong>g all through <strong>the</strong> scriptures, we see over and over aga<strong>in</strong>, that<br />

those who are believers, <strong>God</strong> assigns <strong>the</strong> title, "<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>". So <strong>the</strong>re really is no mystery <strong>in</strong> Genesis<br />

chapter 6 except <strong>the</strong> one that some people seek <strong>to</strong> create for <strong>the</strong>ir own purposes. <strong>The</strong>se sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong><br />

<strong>were</strong> <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> (believers) <strong>of</strong> that day. <strong>God</strong> is a Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> all His people. This is why He called<br />

<strong>the</strong> nation Israel His son. It was an outward representation (was a type <strong>of</strong>) <strong>the</strong> true body <strong>of</strong> Christ. And<br />

<strong>the</strong> Children/<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> Israel represented Christ, His true Son <strong>of</strong> Israel !.<br />

Exodus 4: 22.<br />

• "And thou shalt say un<strong>to</strong> Pharaoh, Thus saith <strong>the</strong> Lord, Israel is my son, even my firstborn".<br />

Hosea 11: 1.<br />

• "When Israel was a child, <strong>the</strong>n I loved him, and called my son out <strong>of</strong> Egypt".<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w 2: 15.<br />

• "And was <strong>the</strong>re until <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord<br />

by <strong>the</strong> prophet, say<strong>in</strong>g, Out <strong>of</strong> Egypt have I called my Son".<br />

Christ was <strong>the</strong> true Son that <strong>the</strong> sons or children <strong>of</strong> Israel looked forward <strong>to</strong>. <strong>The</strong>se are <strong>the</strong> spiritual<br />

th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord which many <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church do not understand. All scripture is consistent with itself,<br />

and flows <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r like a gigantic spiritual picture puzzle, with every piece <strong>in</strong> place. We are true sons <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>God</strong>, children <strong>of</strong> Israel, only because <strong>of</strong> Christ. For He is <strong>the</strong> lamb that was sla<strong>in</strong> from <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> earth. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, His a<strong>to</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g efficacy reaches from Abel, <strong>to</strong> those who are saved <strong>to</strong>day.


Without Him, <strong>the</strong>re is no true belief and no eternal Israel <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re is only <strong>the</strong> superficial. <strong>The</strong> fact<br />

is, at any time on this earth, <strong>the</strong>re have been believers (<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>) and <strong>the</strong> pagans or hea<strong>the</strong>n who<br />

regarded not <strong>God</strong>. And <strong>the</strong>se believers and unbelievers <strong>were</strong> <strong>in</strong>herently at enmity, and <strong>were</strong> not <strong>to</strong> come<br />

<strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> any k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> union <strong>of</strong> marriage. Those who are His people, <strong>God</strong> declares that He is <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

Fa<strong>the</strong>r, and <strong>the</strong>y are His children. Just as when <strong>the</strong> nation Israel came along. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>were</strong> corporately <strong>the</strong><br />

sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>.<br />

Deuteronomy 14: 1-2.<br />

• "Ye are <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord your <strong>God</strong>: Ye shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness<br />

between your eyes for <strong>the</strong> dead.<br />

• For thou art and holy people un<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord thy <strong>God</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> Lord hath chosen <strong>the</strong>e <strong>to</strong> be a<br />

peculiar people un<strong>to</strong> himself, above all <strong>the</strong> nations that are upon <strong>the</strong> earth".<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hebrew words translated "Children <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord your <strong>God</strong>" (ben Yehovah elohiym) are <strong>the</strong> very same<br />

words sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> (ben elohiym), illustrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>God</strong>'s people have a covenant family relationship with<br />

him. i.e, <strong>the</strong>y are sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, and <strong>were</strong> commanded <strong>to</strong> be a nation that rema<strong>in</strong>ed "set apart" from <strong>the</strong><br />

hea<strong>the</strong>n nations, for <strong>the</strong> service <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. This pr<strong>in</strong>ciple for <strong>God</strong>'s people is demonstrated for us <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

New Testament <strong>in</strong> 2 nd Cor<strong>in</strong>thians chapter 6.<br />

2 nd Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 6: 17.<br />

• "Wherefore come out from among <strong>the</strong>m, and be ye separate, saith <strong>the</strong> Lord, and <strong>to</strong>uch not <strong>the</strong><br />

unclean th<strong>in</strong>g: and I will receive you.<br />

• And will be a Fa<strong>the</strong>r un<strong>to</strong> you, and ye shall be My <strong>Sons</strong> and daughters, saith <strong>the</strong> Lord Almighty".<br />

You see, <strong>the</strong>re are two families <strong>in</strong> this world. <strong>The</strong> family <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> and <strong>the</strong> family <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Devil. And <strong>the</strong> two<br />

are <strong>to</strong> rema<strong>in</strong> separate, so that <strong>the</strong> family <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> is not polluted by <strong>the</strong> ideas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hea<strong>the</strong>n/<strong>God</strong>less<br />

peoples. Even from <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with Ca<strong>in</strong> and Able, <strong>God</strong> has always separated his children from <strong>the</strong><br />

unbelievers. Able was a child <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, Ca<strong>in</strong> lived <strong>in</strong> unbelief. Ca<strong>in</strong> slew Able, and he was "Separated" from<br />

<strong>the</strong> family <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. He was cast out from among <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Because <strong>God</strong> cursed him, not want<strong>in</strong>g him among His People. <strong>The</strong> same th<strong>in</strong>g down through <strong>the</strong> ages<br />

as <strong>God</strong> <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>the</strong> nation <strong>of</strong> Israel not <strong>to</strong> not mix with <strong>the</strong> nations around <strong>the</strong>m. Sadly, <strong>the</strong>re are some<br />

misguided souls who th<strong>in</strong>k that this was all because <strong>of</strong> some racist idea. Not at all, it's because Israel<br />

was <strong>the</strong> Old Testament representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family <strong>of</strong> congregation <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>were</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> children, or sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> !. And <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> not <strong>to</strong> be unequally yoked or jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with those <strong>in</strong><br />

unbelief. <strong>The</strong> hea<strong>the</strong>n nations around <strong>the</strong>m <strong>were</strong> those <strong>in</strong> unbelief. It's not that <strong>God</strong> was any respec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

<strong>of</strong> persons, it was just that <strong>the</strong>se <strong>were</strong> <strong>the</strong> children/sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, <strong>the</strong> representation <strong>of</strong> His family, and<br />

as such <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> not <strong>to</strong> mix with <strong>the</strong> unbeliev<strong>in</strong>g, that <strong>the</strong>y not be tempted by <strong>the</strong>ir idolatry.<br />

Ezra 9: 1.<br />

• "..<strong>The</strong> priests and <strong>the</strong> Levites, have not Separated <strong>the</strong>mselves from <strong>the</strong> people <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lands, do<strong>in</strong>g<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir abom<strong>in</strong>ations, even <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Canaanites, <strong>the</strong> Hittites, <strong>the</strong> Perizites, <strong>the</strong> Jebusites,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Amonites, <strong>the</strong> Moabites, <strong>the</strong> Egyptians, <strong>the</strong> Amorites. For <strong>the</strong>y have taken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir Daughters<br />

for <strong>the</strong>mselves, and for <strong>the</strong>ir sons: So that <strong>the</strong> Holy Seed have m<strong>in</strong>gled <strong>the</strong>mselves with <strong>the</strong> people<br />

<strong>of</strong> those lands.."<br />

<strong>God</strong>'s law has not changed. This is <strong>the</strong> same pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that Israel was under, that was <strong>the</strong> reason Ca<strong>in</strong><br />

was cast out, and that <strong>God</strong>'s children <strong>in</strong> Genesis chapter 6 erred <strong>in</strong>.<br />

<strong>What</strong> communion hath light with darkness .


Note <strong>the</strong> error <strong>of</strong> what <strong>the</strong> children or sons <strong>of</strong> Israel <strong>the</strong> (<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>) had<br />

done here . <strong>The</strong>y had done <strong>the</strong> exact same th<strong>in</strong>g Genesis 6 speaks about,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y had gone after <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> men (unbelievers), <strong>the</strong> hea<strong>the</strong>n people<br />

around <strong>the</strong>m, and this was <strong>the</strong> abom<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>to</strong> <strong>God</strong>. Look at <strong>the</strong> language<br />

<strong>the</strong>re. <strong>God</strong> says <strong>the</strong>y m<strong>in</strong>gled <strong>the</strong> Holy seed. Believers (<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>) are not<br />

<strong>to</strong> be yoked with unbelievers. <strong>The</strong>y are not <strong>to</strong> take <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir daughters for<br />

wives or let <strong>the</strong>ir sons go after <strong>the</strong>se daughters. <strong>God</strong> has decreed His<br />

congregation a "Separate" nation or family set apart from <strong>the</strong> world. That<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are not <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>termarry with unbelievers. This is exact same pr<strong>in</strong>ciple we<br />

have <strong>to</strong>day, although it seems <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>to</strong>day has chosen <strong>to</strong> abandon<br />

<strong>God</strong>'s laws concern<strong>in</strong>g this precept <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible !.<br />

2 nd Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 6: 14.<br />

• "Be ye not unequally yoked <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness<br />

with unrighteousness , and what communion hath light with darkness".<br />

When we become <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, we are <strong>to</strong> be a light sh<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> darkness. But you can't mix light<br />

with darkness. <strong>The</strong>y have no communion <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r. Ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> light will overcome <strong>the</strong> darkness, or <strong>the</strong>re<br />

will be no light, and <strong>the</strong> darkness rules. But you can't have <strong>the</strong>m both work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong>y are two<br />

separate entities.<br />

Philippians 2: 15.<br />

• "That ye may be blameless and harmless, <strong>the</strong> (<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>), without rebuke, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst <strong>of</strong> a<br />

crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye sh<strong>in</strong>e as lights <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world".<br />

That is <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple for all who are <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, and it was <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>in</strong> Genesis chapter 6. <strong>The</strong> sons <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>God</strong> <strong>were</strong> <strong>to</strong> sh<strong>in</strong>e as <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, not mix with <strong>the</strong> darkness <strong>of</strong> those outside <strong>God</strong>'s covenant<br />

family. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>were</strong> not <strong>to</strong> marry <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> men, because <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> <strong>of</strong> two <strong>to</strong>tally different people.<br />

Yet we read that <strong>the</strong>y did this anyway, and <strong>the</strong> results <strong>were</strong> devastat<strong>in</strong>g. by lett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir flesh rule over<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, see<strong>in</strong>g how <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> (unsaved) men <strong>were</strong> fair or beautiful, <strong>the</strong>y disregarded <strong>the</strong>se<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> wife. This is much like <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>to</strong>day. <strong>The</strong> result was that <strong>the</strong> world<br />

changed because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir evil unfaithfulness. For that is what happens when you mix believers with<br />

unbelievers. <strong>The</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ual or daily candle goes out and eventually you have darkness rul<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

family. Wickedness abounds because you can't have two rulers <strong>in</strong> one family. This is what <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>God</strong> did.<br />

Genesis 6: 2.<br />

• "That <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> saw <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> men that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> fair and <strong>the</strong>y <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>the</strong>m wives <strong>of</strong><br />

all which <strong>the</strong>y chose".<br />

<strong>The</strong>y <strong>to</strong>ok wives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> un-saved daughters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> giants (nephil) <strong>of</strong> that time, and gave birth <strong>to</strong> unsaved<br />

children who became mighty champions, men <strong>of</strong> renown (famous). Probably much like what we th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong><br />

as famous gladia<strong>to</strong>rs. An analogy <strong>to</strong>day would probably be <strong>the</strong> man's heroes, like football players, or<br />

basketball players, or a movie star. Someone who is a hero, famous, renown or a champion. People<br />

<strong>were</strong> look<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m and all <strong>the</strong> laws <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> <strong>were</strong> left beh<strong>in</strong>d (sound familiar).<br />

That's what happens when you have <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> yoked with unbelievers. <strong>The</strong> seed is m<strong>in</strong>gled<br />

with unbelief and falls away because one spouse be<strong>in</strong>g unsaved doesn't want <strong>to</strong> follow <strong>God</strong>'s laws. And<br />

<strong>of</strong> course (not co<strong>in</strong>cidentally) <strong>God</strong> says after this <strong>the</strong> world became evil cont<strong>in</strong>ually (aga<strong>in</strong>, sound<br />

familiar), and because <strong>the</strong> wickedness <strong>of</strong> man was great, <strong>God</strong> destroyed <strong>the</strong> world with <strong>the</strong> flood.


He saved none alive but Noah and his family. <strong>The</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> by this unrighteousness had become<br />

virtually wiped out except <strong>the</strong> 8 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ark !.<br />

Is it any wonder <strong>God</strong> uses both Noah and Lot as pictures or examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world and <strong>the</strong><br />

apostasy <strong>of</strong> man preced<strong>in</strong>g it . It is a signification <strong>of</strong> how it will be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world when Christ shall make<br />

His second appear<strong>in</strong>g . but <strong>to</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k that <strong>the</strong>se sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> <strong>in</strong> Genesis <strong>were</strong> angels, or that <strong>the</strong> giants<br />

<strong>were</strong> super be<strong>in</strong>gs (as o<strong>the</strong>rs surmise), is such a warped form <strong>of</strong> eisegesis, it is noth<strong>in</strong>g short <strong>of</strong><br />

ridiculous.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are many th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>to</strong> be considered here. Number one, didn't Jesus Christ Himself tell us that when<br />

we get <strong>to</strong> heaven, we will be like <strong>the</strong> angels, who nei<strong>the</strong>r marry nor are given <strong>in</strong> marriage .<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w 22: 30.<br />

• "For <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrection <strong>the</strong>y nei<strong>the</strong>r marry, nor are given <strong>in</strong> marriage, but are as <strong>the</strong> angels <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> heaven".<br />

So how can Christians <strong>the</strong>n simply ignore this, and say <strong>the</strong>se <strong>were</strong> angels marry<strong>in</strong>g women <strong>of</strong> this<br />

earth <strong>in</strong> genesis chapter six . One popular way is <strong>to</strong> rationalize this away and claim that <strong>the</strong>y're no<br />

longer angels. But how <strong>the</strong>n are <strong>the</strong>y called by <strong>God</strong>, sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> (which <strong>the</strong>y claim means angels) .<br />

It makes no sense. <strong>The</strong>y just are not study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scriptures carefully, or <strong>the</strong>y are not tak<strong>in</strong>g everyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account and receiv<strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong>y are read<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong>y cannot be angels, and take women <strong>to</strong> wife. And<br />

if <strong>the</strong>y are not angels, what else can <strong>the</strong>y be . If we say <strong>the</strong>y are anyth<strong>in</strong>g else, where is <strong>the</strong> Biblical<br />

justification for say<strong>in</strong>g it . We certa<strong>in</strong>ly can't just guess at it !. We must use scripture <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<br />

scripture and say <strong>the</strong>se are exactly what <strong>God</strong> says <strong>the</strong>y are. i.e, <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> !. That may not be <strong>the</strong><br />

most <strong>in</strong>trigu<strong>in</strong>g or sensationally <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpretation, but it will be <strong>the</strong> most faithful and biblical<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation. Of course, faithfulness seems <strong>to</strong> be a novel approach <strong>to</strong> study<strong>in</strong>g scripture <strong>the</strong>se days.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r po<strong>in</strong>t is that Genesis chapter 4: 26 lead<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>to</strong> this chapter says, "...<strong>the</strong>n began men <strong>to</strong> call<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves by <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord" In <strong>the</strong> literal, "...<strong>the</strong>n a beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> call after <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong><br />

Jehovah".<br />

This is when people <strong>were</strong> called after <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord, "<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>" !. That those who knew <strong>the</strong><br />

Lord, <strong>were</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Also note "who" <strong>God</strong> is angry with <strong>in</strong> Genesis chapter 6, and who He br<strong>in</strong>gs this judgment upon. It is<br />

with men, and not with angels !. Let us use simple logic here. If <strong>the</strong>se <strong>were</strong> angels, <strong>God</strong> would be angry<br />

with angels for com<strong>in</strong>g down and tak<strong>in</strong>g daughters <strong>of</strong> men <strong>to</strong> wife, not angry at men for what's tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

place. Once we understand what is happen<strong>in</strong>g here, we see that <strong>the</strong>se can only be sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>,<br />

(believers) who went after <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> men, (unbelievers) and <strong>the</strong>ir seed became unrighteous<br />

because <strong>of</strong> it. Thus <strong>the</strong> world became corrupted and wicked because <strong>of</strong> this violation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> law <strong>of</strong><br />

separation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> from unbelievers. This happened because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> error <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>,<br />

which by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Noah, had dw<strong>in</strong>dled down <strong>to</strong> just his family. And so <strong>God</strong> brought judgment upon<br />

<strong>the</strong> world for <strong>the</strong>ir unrighteousness.<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong>, note also a most tell<strong>in</strong>g statement. When we read <strong>in</strong> verse 2 that <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>the</strong><br />

daughters <strong>of</strong> men <strong>to</strong> wife, what is <strong>God</strong>'s response <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> very next verse .<br />

• "And <strong>the</strong> Lord said, my spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he is also flesh: Yet his<br />

days shall be a hundred and twenty years".


Aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> take daughters <strong>of</strong> men, and<br />

<strong>God</strong> is angry with man, not angels and not angel<br />

children. Flesh and blood human be<strong>in</strong>gs !. His<br />

spirit will not always strive with man, not with<br />

angels. Man is but flesh, and his error is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

flesh. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>God</strong> is go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<br />

judgment upon him for his weakness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flesh.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> <strong>were</strong> s<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

flesh, by tak<strong>in</strong>g wives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unsaved, simply<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> fair <strong>to</strong> look upon (beautiful <strong>in</strong><br />

our vernacular). This is <strong>the</strong> reason for judgment<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> earth, it's always been !. Not because<br />

Super angels copulated with humans, but<br />

because <strong>God</strong>'s people went after strange flesh !.<br />

Let us <strong>to</strong>uch briefly on a few o<strong>the</strong>r verses that are<br />

sometimes used <strong>to</strong> try and prove <strong>the</strong>se <strong>were</strong><br />

angels.<br />

Job 1: 6.<br />

• "Now <strong>the</strong>re was a day when <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> came <strong>to</strong> present <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>the</strong> Lord, and<br />

Satan came also among <strong>the</strong>m".<br />

Job 2: 1.<br />

• "Aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>re was a day when <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> came <strong>to</strong> present <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>the</strong> Lord", and<br />

"Satan came also among <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> present himself before <strong>the</strong> Lord".<br />

Any Bible that you have that translates <strong>the</strong>se words as angels is a mistranslation. <strong>The</strong> words sons <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>God</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se verses are <strong>the</strong> exact same Hebrew as found throughout scripture for sons, and for <strong>God</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> same <strong>in</strong> Genesis chapter 6.<br />

It's (ben 'elohiym) or (bane el-o-heem) which is literally children or <strong>Sons</strong>/<strong>God</strong>. <strong>The</strong> exact same words <strong>in</strong><br />

all <strong>the</strong> verses. Not <strong>the</strong> Hebrew word "angels" (mal'ak) or Messenger, but <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. Any Bible that<br />

translates this angel is mak<strong>in</strong>g a "commentary" and not a translation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hebrew. And <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

difference !. I don't m<strong>in</strong>d people mak<strong>in</strong>g commentaries, but when <strong>the</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>mselves on <strong>the</strong> pages <strong>of</strong><br />

scripture "as Scripture" that's when I draw <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e. It is an unrighteous th<strong>in</strong>g for anyone <strong>to</strong> translate<br />

(ben 'elohiym) as angels when it is <strong>the</strong> Hebrew "<strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>".<br />

If <strong>God</strong> had wanted <strong>to</strong> say angels, He very well could have had <strong>the</strong> Holy men <strong>of</strong> old use that Hebrew<br />

word He has prescribed and uses for angel throughout scripture, he didn’t.<br />

Case Closed !.<br />

Some people have been confused by <strong>the</strong> language "<strong>the</strong>y came <strong>to</strong> present (yatsab) (mean<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>to</strong> "station"<br />

or position) <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>the</strong> Lord". Some th<strong>in</strong>k that this means that <strong>the</strong>y went <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> heaven. That's<br />

not <strong>the</strong> case. We have <strong>to</strong> keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> times that we are read<strong>in</strong>g about. <strong>The</strong>se <strong>were</strong> <strong>the</strong> early years<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world. <strong>The</strong> language <strong>of</strong> "Present<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>God</strong>", is common <strong>in</strong> Biblical His<strong>to</strong>ry, and<br />

doesn't denote an appearance <strong>in</strong> Heaven. It is simply language denot<strong>in</strong>g com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> place or<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>quire <strong>of</strong> Him. Today, we'd go <strong>to</strong> a Church and pray. That would be our com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>quire <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. In those days, <strong>the</strong>y would have <strong>the</strong>ir own designated Holy place, and <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>God</strong> would<br />

speak <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m directly.<br />

For example <strong>in</strong>:


Deuteronomy 31: 14-15.<br />

• "...call Joshua, and Present Your selves <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tabernacle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> congregation, that I may give him<br />

a charge. And Moses and Joshua went, and presented <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tabernacle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

congregation.<br />

• and <strong>the</strong> Lord Appeared <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tabernacle <strong>in</strong> a pillar <strong>of</strong> a cloud:...."<br />

<strong>God</strong> <strong>to</strong>ld Moses <strong>to</strong> Present (yatsab) (same word) himself and Joshua before Him <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tabernacle, and<br />

"<strong>God</strong>" spoke <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. And note, <strong>the</strong>y did not appear <strong>in</strong> Heaven. Compar<strong>in</strong>g scripture with scripture we<br />

see this language <strong>of</strong> present<strong>in</strong>g oneself before <strong>the</strong> Lord doesn't denote an appearance <strong>in</strong> heaven. Here<br />

<strong>the</strong>y presented <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>God</strong>, but it was <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tabernacle. It's <strong>the</strong> exact same th<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>the</strong><br />

sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> present<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves. In <strong>the</strong>se early days, <strong>God</strong> spoke <strong>to</strong> His servants <strong>the</strong> Prophets <strong>in</strong> a<br />

special way. And <strong>of</strong>ten times that meant an appearance or His presence <strong>in</strong> a special way. Aga<strong>in</strong>, don't<br />

take my word for it, compare scripture with scripture.<br />

1 st Samuel 10: 19.<br />

• "Now <strong>the</strong>refore present yourselves before <strong>the</strong> Lord by your tribes, and by your thousands".<br />

Present (same Hebrew word) <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>the</strong> Lord, and <strong>the</strong>y'd <strong>in</strong>quire <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. Did that mean <strong>the</strong><br />

tribes <strong>of</strong> Israel went <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> Heaven <strong>to</strong> present <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>the</strong> Lord . Certa<strong>in</strong>ly not, but this is <strong>the</strong><br />

language <strong>God</strong> uses <strong>to</strong> describe <strong>the</strong> ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>quire <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>. Ano<strong>the</strong>r verse is, Numbers 11:<br />

16 where <strong>the</strong> Lord tells Moses <strong>to</strong> ga<strong>the</strong>r 70 <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> tabernacle <strong>to</strong> stand (same Hebrew word Present)<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves with Moses, and "GOD" would come down and talk with Him <strong>the</strong>re. You see, this was simply<br />

<strong>the</strong> language <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> old days <strong>of</strong> when <strong>the</strong> believers, <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, (whatever you want <strong>to</strong> call <strong>the</strong>m),<br />

would come <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>quire <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord. <strong>The</strong>y would present <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>the</strong> Lord <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>quire and for<br />

<strong>in</strong>struction. So it's really no different from say<strong>in</strong>g, "<strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> came <strong>to</strong> present <strong>the</strong>mselves before<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lord", and <strong>of</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g "<strong>the</strong> believers came <strong>to</strong> present <strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>the</strong> Lord".<br />

It's human be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> view here, not angels, and not <strong>in</strong> heaven.<br />

Literally, Job 1: 6 says "And <strong>the</strong>re doth come Satan <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir midst". So <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> came <strong>to</strong> present<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves before <strong>God</strong>, and Satan came <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, it's no mystery !. It's not unlike <strong>the</strong> 12<br />

Disciples with Christ <strong>in</strong> Jerusalem, and Satan <strong>in</strong>dwell<strong>in</strong>g Judas <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re we have an example <strong>of</strong> Satan com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, where is <strong>the</strong> mystery .<br />

Satan makes his appearance on earth, through men. Ano<strong>the</strong>r passage people br<strong>in</strong>g up is Job 38.<br />

Job 38: 7.<br />

• "When <strong>the</strong> morn<strong>in</strong>g star sang <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r, and all <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> shouted for Joy".<br />

<strong>The</strong> passage <strong>in</strong> Job 38: 7 may be a little more difficult <strong>to</strong> understand, but <strong>the</strong> chapter becomes clear<br />

once we compare scripture with scripture. <strong>The</strong> entire chapter is speak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> symbolical terms. <strong>God</strong><br />

talks about where <strong>the</strong> foundations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth are fastened <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r (or sockets been sunk). <strong>The</strong> Earth<br />

isn't sunk by sockets. It says who laid <strong>the</strong> corner s<strong>to</strong>ne. <strong>The</strong> earth wasn't laid on corner s<strong>to</strong>nes. It says<br />

<strong>the</strong> sea is shut with doors. <strong>The</strong> sea doesn't have any doors on it. It says <strong>the</strong> sea bursts forth as a<br />

womb. <strong>The</strong> sea is not a womb. It talks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clouds as a swaddl<strong>in</strong>g bands, and bars be<strong>in</strong>g set, <strong>God</strong><br />

talk<strong>in</strong>g and command<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> morn<strong>in</strong>g, tak<strong>in</strong>g hold <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>gs or ends <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth, it be<strong>in</strong>g as a<br />

clo<strong>the</strong>s or a garment, a broken arm, etc, etc, etc. <strong>The</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t I'm mak<strong>in</strong>g is, all <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs symbolize<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g. It's not a literal broken arm <strong>in</strong> view here, or literal bars and doors or literal stars burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

forth s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. So why should we take this alone <strong>to</strong> be literally angels, when everyth<strong>in</strong>g else <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

chapter speaks symbolically .


This all has a Spiritual significance no doubt, which is beyond <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> this study. But <strong>God</strong> is<br />

talk<strong>in</strong>g about His Creation process and us<strong>in</strong>g spiritual language <strong>of</strong> creation, stars and sons <strong>to</strong> signify<br />

Christ and His k<strong>in</strong>gdom. Stars don't literally s<strong>in</strong>g, nor <strong>the</strong> world literally sat on s<strong>to</strong>nes.<br />

<strong>God</strong> says <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>to</strong> pa<strong>in</strong>t a spiritual picture puzzle which we must discern by rightly divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

word. <strong>God</strong> has always used <strong>the</strong> stars as <strong>to</strong>kens for believers, just as He uses <strong>the</strong> Sun <strong>to</strong> signify Christ.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se significations or symbolic terms started from <strong>the</strong> very beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Genesis. <strong>The</strong> stars are part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lights <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world created from <strong>the</strong> Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, and all are symbolic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord !.<br />

Likewise, those <strong>in</strong> Christ are called by <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs, lamps, candles, stars, etc, because we are<br />

reflections or vessels <strong>of</strong> Christ.<br />

<strong>The</strong> House or Temple <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord, it's <strong>the</strong>se "Spiritual Th<strong>in</strong>gs" which so many <strong>the</strong>ologians don't really<br />

comprehend. But this is <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>, <strong>the</strong> foundation laid.<br />

Consider Chapters like Ezra and compare scripture with scripture know<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> Lord does noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

by accident.<br />

Ezra 3: 10-12.<br />

• "And when <strong>the</strong> builders laid <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> temple <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord, <strong>the</strong>y set <strong>the</strong> priests <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

apparel with trumpets, and <strong>the</strong> Levites <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> Asaph with cymbals, <strong>to</strong> praise <strong>the</strong> Lord, after<br />

<strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> David k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Israel".<br />

• And <strong>the</strong>y sang <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r by course <strong>in</strong> prais<strong>in</strong>g and giv<strong>in</strong>g thanks un<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord because he is good,<br />

for his mercy endureth for ever <strong>to</strong>ward Israel. And all <strong>the</strong> people shouted with a great shout,<br />

when <strong>the</strong>y praised <strong>the</strong> Lord, because <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> house <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord was laid.<br />

• But many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> priests and Levites and chief <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>rs, who <strong>were</strong> ancient men, that had<br />

seen <strong>the</strong> first house, when <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> this house was laid before <strong>the</strong>ir eyes, wept with a<br />

loud voice and many shouted aloud for joy:<br />

<strong>The</strong> same picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stars s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g and shout<strong>in</strong>g for Joy and <strong>the</strong> foundation laid, which <strong>God</strong>'s<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al creation mirrors. Because it's "meant" <strong>to</strong> show a spiritual truth which has noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> do with<br />

literal stars or angels !. But as I said, that's a whole o<strong>the</strong>r study <strong>in</strong> itself, and beyond <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> this<br />

one.<br />

Mark 12: 25 Makes it perfectly clear angels could not have been <strong>in</strong> view <strong>in</strong> Genesis chapter 6, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

daughters <strong>of</strong> Men <strong>to</strong> wife. It should settle <strong>the</strong> whole issue right <strong>the</strong>re, but it won't. Because some people<br />

make up <strong>the</strong>ir m<strong>in</strong>ds, and <strong>the</strong>y just refuse <strong>to</strong> be confused with triviality like, <strong>the</strong> Biblical facts.<br />

I've found that many people will believe whatever <strong>the</strong>y are taught no matter what evidence you br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> table. But this article is for those who have spiritual ears and keep <strong>God</strong>'s word, and know <strong>the</strong><br />

righteousness <strong>of</strong> compar<strong>in</strong>g scripture with scripture, spiritual th<strong>in</strong>gs with spiritual th<strong>in</strong>gs (1 st Cor. 2:<br />

13), <strong>to</strong> come <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> truth <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

One o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>g that some people seem <strong>to</strong> get hung up on is <strong>the</strong> word translated Giants (KJV) <strong>in</strong> verse<br />

4 <strong>of</strong> Genesis chapter 6. In <strong>the</strong> Hebrew (nephel). <strong>The</strong>y like <strong>to</strong> throw <strong>the</strong> word Nefeel, Nephel or Nephelims<br />

around like it's a name for a alien race. <strong>The</strong> fact is, it's not a name for an alien race <strong>of</strong> people, it's a<br />

description <strong>of</strong> a type <strong>of</strong> people. Nephel <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al means "FELL'er". i.e, one who would make you<br />

fall, or one who you would fall at <strong>the</strong> sight <strong>of</strong>. Like as a "BIG" or "GIANT" person. Thus, it is correctly<br />

translated Giants here. But <strong>the</strong>re is no mystery. We can prove that very easily. Because <strong>The</strong> Giants<br />

(nephel) is spoken <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong> Genesis before <strong>the</strong> flood, and aga<strong>in</strong> after <strong>the</strong> flood. Now s<strong>in</strong>ce we (Bible<br />

Believers) know that everyone on earth was destroyed by <strong>the</strong> flood <strong>of</strong> Noah's day, and only Noah and<br />

His own survived, and <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong>n't Nephel (if nephel means this alien race) <strong>the</strong>n we know by simple<br />

common sense and logic that this "so called" race <strong>of</strong> Nephel could not have survived. It makes<br />

absolutely no sense unless we are unreasonable and refuse <strong>to</strong> listen <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> facts.


"A Reasonable man adapts himself <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

facts <strong>of</strong> scripture which He reads.<br />

An unreasonable man seeks <strong>to</strong> have <strong>the</strong> facts<br />

<strong>of</strong> scripture adapt <strong>to</strong> his teach<strong>in</strong>gs".<br />

Nephel is simply a old word used <strong>in</strong> description <strong>of</strong> "Big" People. Could be literally big <strong>in</strong> stature, or big<br />

<strong>in</strong> position, as <strong>in</strong> famous or a champion. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, it's a word mean<strong>in</strong>g big, not a name <strong>of</strong> a tribe<br />

or a race. We have a tribe <strong>of</strong> people <strong>in</strong> Africa <strong>to</strong>day who are very, very tall. <strong>The</strong>re is also a tribe that is<br />

very very small, or short. When talk<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong>m, we can say <strong>the</strong>y're big, or giants, or <strong>the</strong>y're small,<br />

or little. If we <strong>were</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old way <strong>of</strong> nam<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs, we would say <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> Nephel (Giants).<br />

But we don't ascribe <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g "angels" just because <strong>the</strong>ir size is unusual. And we shouldn't do it<br />

with <strong>the</strong> scriptures ei<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong>y're Big. <strong>The</strong>y're Fellers, <strong>the</strong>y're Giants. But <strong>the</strong>y are not <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong><br />

angels mat<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> whole idea is preposterous !. It means Giants, noth<strong>in</strong>g more. And that's how <strong>the</strong><br />

word Nephel is used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scriptures. As <strong>the</strong>re are <strong>to</strong>day, <strong>the</strong>re <strong>were</strong> some tribes or families <strong>of</strong> people<br />

that <strong>were</strong> very big, or giants <strong>in</strong> those days. Goliath was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se, and <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> Anak also.<br />

<strong>The</strong> word Giants, just means <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> big, or <strong>of</strong> great stature. It didn't identify an alien race or angels.<br />

In fact, we can see that clearly as we read.<br />

Numbers 13: 33.<br />

• "And <strong>the</strong>re we saw <strong>the</strong> giants (nephel) <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> Anak, which come <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> giants (gibbowr), and<br />

we <strong>were</strong> <strong>in</strong> our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we <strong>were</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sight".<br />

You see, here we have that word aga<strong>in</strong>. Nephel, <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> Anak. That's pro<strong>of</strong> aga<strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> word<br />

nephel is not describ<strong>in</strong>g a new race, but a attribute. Because <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Anakims, who<br />

Joshua destroyed <strong>in</strong> Canaan. <strong>The</strong>se could hardly be <strong>the</strong> same race <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nephilims</strong> that <strong>were</strong> "before" <strong>the</strong><br />

flood. <strong>The</strong> whole idea is ludicrous !. Or did angels drop by aga<strong>in</strong> after <strong>the</strong> flood also <strong>to</strong> mate with<br />

Human women . No, <strong>the</strong> whole idea is silly. Notice that second word translated Giants (gibbowr). It<br />

means warriors or strong Champions. And note <strong>the</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se men because <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> what <br />

That's why <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> called nephel (Giants). <strong>The</strong>y <strong>were</strong> BIG, not angels !. Verse 32 says "<strong>of</strong> great<br />

stature". <strong>The</strong>y <strong>were</strong> afraid <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m because <strong>the</strong>y <strong>were</strong> unusually large people. But it has noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> do<br />

with angels mat<strong>in</strong>g, anymore than <strong>the</strong> tall people <strong>in</strong> Africa <strong>to</strong>day have anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> do with mat<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

angels. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>were</strong> simply a tribe <strong>of</strong> Big people who would frighten you if you had <strong>to</strong> battle <strong>the</strong>m. Would<br />

you ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> go <strong>to</strong> battle aga<strong>in</strong>st a army <strong>of</strong> people <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> Wilt Chamberla<strong>in</strong>, or an army stand<strong>in</strong>g 5<br />

feet 9 <strong>in</strong>ches. <strong>The</strong> answer is obvious. So that's what that verse above illustrates. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>were</strong> afraid<br />

because <strong>the</strong>se <strong>were</strong> an army <strong>of</strong> big People, Nephels, Giants !.<br />

<strong>The</strong> natural man delights <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g a mystery where <strong>the</strong>re is none because <strong>the</strong> truth doesn't seem<br />

exotic enough for <strong>the</strong>m. <strong>The</strong>y want someth<strong>in</strong>g more. But <strong>the</strong> truth is that <strong>the</strong>se <strong>were</strong> Giants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

land.<br />

<strong>The</strong> synopsis <strong>of</strong> Genesis chapter 6, is that <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>the</strong> daughters <strong>of</strong> men <strong>to</strong> wife. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>were</strong><br />

believers who disobeyed <strong>God</strong> and went after <strong>the</strong> unsaved women who looked good, and <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>the</strong>y<br />

brought forth unsaved seed who corrupted <strong>the</strong> earth so that <strong>the</strong>re was noth<strong>in</strong>g but evil cont<strong>in</strong>ually.<br />

And <strong>God</strong> saw what <strong>the</strong>y had done and sent <strong>the</strong> flood <strong>to</strong> wipe out <strong>the</strong> wickedness. And all perished<br />

except Noah and His own family. "Let that be a lesson <strong>to</strong> all <strong>of</strong> us". We must not be unequally yoked<br />

with an unbeliever, for that will cause terrible repercussions down <strong>the</strong> road. Unfortunately, this is<br />

"Exactly" what is happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>day.<br />

Not only with believers go<strong>in</strong>g after, and marry<strong>in</strong>g unbelievers literally, but also spiritually as <strong>the</strong> church<br />

is unequally yok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves with unbelievers. <strong>The</strong>y are mak<strong>in</strong>g all k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> excuses for <strong>the</strong>ir actions,<br />

and <strong>the</strong>y just don't realize what this error will br<strong>in</strong>g upon <strong>the</strong> Church, Nibiru is already <strong>in</strong> sight !.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!