01.02.2015 Views

Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>under</strong>-<strong>five</strong> <strong>year</strong> <strong>rural</strong> <strong>children</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Madhya Pradesh State<br />

District: SEONI<br />

Morena<br />

Bh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

Sheopur<br />

Gwalior<br />

Datia<br />

Shivpuri<br />

Neemuch<br />

Mandsaur<br />

Ratlam Ujja<strong>in</strong><br />

Jhabua<br />

Indore<br />

Dhar<br />

Alirajpur<br />

Rajgarh<br />

Shajapur<br />

Dewas<br />

Sehore<br />

Guna<br />

Harda<br />

Bhopal<br />

Ashok<br />

Nagar<br />

Vidisha<br />

Raisen<br />

Hoshangabad<br />

Tikamgarh<br />

Sagar<br />

Narsimhapur<br />

Chh<strong>in</strong>dwara<br />

Chhatarpur<br />

Panna<br />

Damoh<br />

Seoni<br />

Jabalpur<br />

Katni<br />

Mandla<br />

Satna<br />

Umaria<br />

D<strong>in</strong>dori<br />

Rewa<br />

Shahdol<br />

Sidhi<br />

Anuppur<br />

S<strong>in</strong>grauli<br />

Barwani<br />

Khargone<br />

Khandwa<br />

Betul<br />

Balaghat<br />

Burhanpur<br />

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NUTRITION<br />

Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Medical Research<br />

Hyderabad – 500 007<br />

2011


<strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong><br />

Five <strong>year</strong> Rural <strong>children</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Madhya Pradesh State<br />

- Seoni District<br />

G.N.V.Brahmam<br />

K.Venkaiah<br />

A.Laxmaiah<br />

I.I.Meshram<br />

K.Mallikharjuna Rao<br />

Ch.Gal Reddy<br />

Sharad Kumar<br />

M.Rav<strong>in</strong>dranath<br />

K.Sreerama Krishna<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition<br />

Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Medical Research<br />

Hyderabad – 500 007<br />

2011


CONTENTS<br />

Page No.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

PROJECT STAFF<br />

RESULTS AT GLANCE<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

i – iii<br />

1. INTRODUCTION 1 – 3<br />

1.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Seoni District 3<br />

2. OBJECTIVES 4<br />

2.1 General Objective 4<br />

2.2 Specific Objectives 4<br />

3. METHODOLOGY 4 – 7<br />

3.1 Sampl<strong>in</strong>g Design 4<br />

3.1.1 Sample size 4<br />

3.1.2 Selection <strong>of</strong> Villages 5<br />

3.1.3 Selection <strong>of</strong> Households 5<br />

3.2 Investigations 5<br />

3.2.1 Household Demographic and Socio-economic particulars 5<br />

3.2.2 Anthropometry 5<br />

3.2.3 Cl<strong>in</strong>ical exam<strong>in</strong>ation 6<br />

3.2.4 History <strong>of</strong> Morbidity 6<br />

3.2.5 Maternal Particulars 6<br />

3.2.6 Infant and Young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices 6<br />

3.2.7 Coverage <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> <strong>under</strong> various health & nutrition<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention Programmes 6<br />

3.2.8 Spot test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> household cook<strong>in</strong>g salt for Iod<strong>in</strong>e 6<br />

3.3 Recruitment, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, standardization <strong>of</strong> field Investigators and<br />

data collection<br />

3.4 Quality Control 7<br />

3.5 Data Analysis 7<br />

4. RESULTS 7 – 17<br />

4.1 Coverage 7<br />

4.2 Household Demographic and Socio-economic particulars 7<br />

4.2.1 Community 7<br />

4.2.2 Type <strong>of</strong> family 8<br />

4.2.3 Family size 8<br />

4.2.4 Literacy status <strong>of</strong> Father 8<br />

4.2.5 Literacy status <strong>of</strong> Mother 8<br />

6<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


4.2.6 Household landhold<strong>in</strong>g 8<br />

4.2.7 Major occupation <strong>of</strong> Father 8<br />

4.2.8 Major occupation <strong>of</strong> Mother 8<br />

4.2.9 Per capita monthly <strong>in</strong>come 8<br />

4.3 Household Physical facilities 8<br />

4.3.1 Type <strong>of</strong> house 8<br />

4.3.2 Household amenities 9<br />

4.4 Iod<strong>in</strong>e content <strong>of</strong> Cook<strong>in</strong>g salt 9<br />

4.5 Maternal characteristics 9<br />

4.5.1 Age and parity <strong>of</strong> mother 9<br />

4.5.2 Particulars <strong>of</strong> last Pregnancy (mothers <strong>of</strong>


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We express our s<strong>in</strong>cere thanks to Mr. B.R. Naidu, I.A.S, Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Secretary,<br />

and Smt. T<strong>in</strong>oo Joshi, I.A.S, and Dr. Loveleen Kacker, I.A.S, past Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<br />

Secretaries, Women and Child Development & Social Justice Department,<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh for provid<strong>in</strong>g us an opportunity to carry out this<br />

study.<br />

Our thanks are due to Ms. Kam<strong>in</strong>i Chauhan I.A.S, Deputy Secretary, Dr.<br />

Anupam Rajan, Director and Shri. Akshaya Srivatsav, Jo<strong>in</strong>t Director, Women and<br />

Child Development Department, Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh for their support<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the study.<br />

We are also thanksful to Shri. Gulshan Bamra, former Director, and Sri Praveen<br />

Kumar Gangrade, former Jt. Director, Women and Child Development Department,<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, and their colleagues for extend<strong>in</strong>g their cooperation and<br />

help <strong>in</strong> the execution <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>frastructural & logistic support extended by Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K. Trivedi,<br />

Executive Director, Mr. Gokul pal, Research Officer and their colleagues at Indian<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Development Management (IIDM), Bhopal is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

Our thanks are also due to UNICEF-Madhya Pradesh and UNICEF-New Delhi<br />

for their support by provid<strong>in</strong>g anthropometric equipment for use <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />

The help and support provided by the Districts Project Officers, Child<br />

Development Project Officers, Supervisors, Anganwadi Workers (AWWs) and<br />

ASHA worker (Health functionaries) <strong>of</strong> the concerned districts <strong>in</strong> the execution <strong>of</strong><br />

the survey, is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

Our s<strong>in</strong>cere thanks to the entire field staff for their commitment and<br />

s<strong>in</strong>cere efforts <strong>in</strong> the collection <strong>of</strong> data.<br />

We grateful to Dr. B. Sesikeran, Director, N.I.N and Dr. Vishwa Mohan<br />

Katoch, Director-general, I.C.M.R, and Secretary, Department <strong>of</strong> Health Research,<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health and Family Welfare, GoI, for their constant support and<br />

encouragement.<br />

We also thank Mr. G.Manohar Reddy, Research Officer, Mr. R. Raghunath<br />

Babu, Technical Assistant, Mrs. G.Madhavi, Technician, Ms. D.Sarala & G.Madhavi<br />

Tabulators, NNMB-CRL, and Ms. D. Balamani, Ms. D. Saritha & Ms. M. Venkata<br />

Ramanamma, Punch Operators, and Mrs. L. Rajeswari & Mr. M. Shashi Kumar Reddy,<br />

Data Entry Operators for their technical help.<br />

We are also thankful to Mr. G. Hanumantha Rao, and Mrs. G. Prashanthi,<br />

Personal Assistants for their secretarial assistance.<br />

Last but not least, we are extremely grateful to the community for their<br />

unst<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g cooperation, without which the study would not have been completed<br />

successfully.<br />

Authors


PROJECT STAFF<br />

RESEARCH ASSISTANTS<br />

Sl.No.<br />

Name<br />

1. Mr. Sach<strong>in</strong> Parey<br />

2. Mr. Nimesh Kumar<br />

3. Mr. Sevakram Gore<br />

FIELD INVESTIGATOR<br />

Sl.No.<br />

Name<br />

1. Mr. Omprakash Nath<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> < 5 <strong>year</strong> Children<br />

Seoni Dist. - Madhya Pradesh


RESULTS AT GLANCE


RESULTS AT A GLANCE<br />

DISTRICT PROFILE<br />

Total population (2001 Census) 11,66,608<br />

Sex Ratio 981<br />

Population density (per sq km) 133<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> Schedule caste 10.0<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> Schedule Tribes 37.0<br />

Literacy status (%) 65.9<br />

Female literacy (%) 54.1<br />

SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS<br />

HHs surveyed (n) 399<br />

Average Family size (n) 5.5<br />

Average per capita monthly <strong>in</strong>come (Rs) 743<br />

COMMUNITY (%)<br />

Scheduled Caste 6.5<br />

Scheduled Tribe 58.7<br />

TYPE OF FAMILY (%)<br />

Nuclear 52.4<br />

Extended Nuclear 15.8<br />

Jo<strong>in</strong>t 31.8<br />

LITERACY STATUS (%)<br />

Father 73.9<br />

Mother 64.2<br />

LAND HOLDING (% HHs)<br />

Land less Families 34.4<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>al Farmers 20.3<br />

Small Farmers 26.8<br />

Large Farmers 18.5<br />

(Contd… 2)<br />

.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> < 5 <strong>year</strong> Children<br />

Seoni Dt.- Madhya Pradesh


RESULTS AT A GLANCE (Contd…2)<br />

MAJOR OCCUPATION OF HOUSEHOLD<br />

Percent<br />

Labourers 60.9<br />

Cultivators 32.8<br />

Land Lords 0.0<br />

Artisans 0.5<br />

Service 2.0<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess 2.0<br />

TYPE OF HOUSE<br />

Kutcha 16.5<br />

Semi-Pucca 82.2<br />

Pucca 1.3<br />

SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER<br />

Open well 26.8<br />

Tube well 64.7<br />

Tap 8.0<br />

HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICITY 83.0<br />

PRESENT AND USING SANITARY LATRINE 5.0<br />

IODINE CONTENT OF COOKING SALT<br />

0 ppm 56.9<br />


DELIVERY CONDUCTED BY<br />

RESULTS AT A GLANCE (Contd…3)<br />

BREAST FEEDING AND COMPLEMENTARY FEEDING<br />

Percent<br />

M.O. PHC 50.0<br />

TB/ANM/LHV 24.4<br />

Pvt. Doctor 2.3<br />

Untra<strong>in</strong>ed Dai/Others 21.0<br />

Low birth weight (% <strong>in</strong>fants) 9.5<br />

Initiate <strong>of</strong> Breast feed<strong>in</strong>g (hours)<br />


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Executive Summary<br />

Undernutrition cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be a major public health problem <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g India, the most vulnerable groups be<strong>in</strong>g women and young<br />

<strong>children</strong>. Proper nutrition is necessary for adequate growth and development <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>children</strong>. Undernutrition is <strong>of</strong> multi-factorial aetiology, which <strong>in</strong>clude both food and<br />

non-food factors.<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition (


ANC before 16 weeks <strong>of</strong> gestation. About 93% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women received IFA<br />

tablets dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy, 57% received ≥90 tablets and only 13% reportedly<br />

consumed ≥90 tablets. About 79% were <strong>in</strong>stitutional deliveries, either <strong>in</strong> government or<br />

private hospitals. Majority (50%) <strong>of</strong> deliveries were conducted by a medical doctor.<br />

Birth weight was recorded <strong>in</strong> 83% <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants, while relevant records were available for<br />

73%. The overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> low birth weight was about 10%.<br />

All the mothers (100%) fed colostrum to their newborns. About 10% <strong>of</strong><br />

mothers <strong>in</strong>itiated breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> 1hour and 70% did so with<strong>in</strong> 1-3 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery. Pre-lacteal feeds such as cow/buffalo milk, goat milk and honey, etc. were<br />

given <strong>in</strong> about 6% <strong>of</strong> new borns.<br />

Only about 45% <strong>of</strong> 6-11 months <strong>children</strong> received complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g at 6<br />

months <strong>of</strong> age, while34% <strong>children</strong> received dur<strong>in</strong>g 7-12 months <strong>of</strong> age. About 14% <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>children</strong> did not start complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Of the 6-11 months <strong>in</strong>fants, about 85% each were receiv<strong>in</strong>g home made<br />

semisolids/solids and 75% receiv<strong>in</strong>g cow/buffalo milk, about 71% were receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

such foods at least 3 times a day. Among 12-35 months <strong>children</strong>, 67% received<br />

complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> addition to breast milk. Majority were receiv<strong>in</strong>g home<br />

made semisolids/solids and 95% were receiv<strong>in</strong>g complementary foods at least 3<br />

times a day.<br />

About 97% <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> were completely immunized dur<strong>in</strong>g 1 st <strong>year</strong>, while<br />

about 3% did not receive or partially immunized. About 94% <strong>of</strong> 9-59 months <strong>children</strong><br />

received at least one dose <strong>of</strong> Vitam<strong>in</strong> A dur<strong>in</strong>g the preced<strong>in</strong>g <strong>year</strong>. About 61% <strong>of</strong> 18-<br />

35 months <strong>children</strong> and 73% <strong>of</strong> 36-59 months <strong>children</strong> received the stipulated two<br />

doses.<br />

About 1% <strong>of</strong> 12-59 months <strong>children</strong> received and consumed ≥90 IFA tablets.<br />

None <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fants exhibited the cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs <strong>of</strong> nutritional deficiency, while<br />

1% <strong>of</strong> 36-59 months <strong>children</strong> exhibited the signs <strong>of</strong> Bitot spots.<br />

About 32% <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> reportedly had one or more morbidities such as fever,<br />

ARI and diarrhoea dur<strong>in</strong>g the preced<strong>in</strong>g fortnight. The prevalence was relatively<br />

higher among 6-23 months <strong>children</strong>, which tended to decrease with <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> age.<br />

About 53% <strong>of</strong> the mothers reported that they generally consult private practitioner,<br />

while 45% went to PHC, to seek treatment for their sick <strong>children</strong>.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


The overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition (


1. INTRODUCTION<br />

India, <strong>in</strong> the past few decades, has witnessed rapid progress <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrialization and agricultural production. Yet malnutrition, especially<br />

<strong>under</strong>nutrition cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be a major problem <strong>of</strong> public health significance <strong>in</strong> the<br />

country. It is a major contributor to high rates <strong>of</strong> childhood mortality, maternal<br />

mortality and morbidities <strong>in</strong> the community 1 . Though, poverty is a major <strong>under</strong>ly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cause, scores <strong>of</strong> other factors such as socio-demographic, socio-cultural and lifestyle<br />

practices contribute significantly to the problem <strong>of</strong> malnutrition.<br />

Prevalence <strong>of</strong> low birth weight, ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e growth retardation<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be high, which is attributable to maternal <strong>under</strong>nutrition. This is further<br />

aggravated by <strong>in</strong>appropriate <strong>in</strong>fant and young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices, such as<br />

discard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> colostrum, delayed <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> breast feed<strong>in</strong>g, early or delayed<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g and sub-optimal complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> feed, quantity and frequency.<br />

It has been found that non-exclusive breast feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the first six months <strong>of</strong><br />

life results <strong>in</strong> 1.4 million deaths and 10% <strong>of</strong> the disease burden among <strong>in</strong>fants and<br />

young <strong>children</strong> every <strong>year</strong> <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries 2 . It is also estimated that about<br />

10-15% <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>five</strong> <strong>year</strong> deaths <strong>in</strong> resource poor countries could be prevented by<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g 90% <strong>of</strong> exclusive breast feed<strong>in</strong>g alone 3 and 22% <strong>of</strong> neonatal deaths could<br />

be prevented if breast feed<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>itiated with<strong>in</strong> the first hour <strong>of</strong> birth 4 .<br />

About 21% <strong>of</strong> global deaths and DALYs (Disability Adjusted Life Years) <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>children</strong> younger than 5 <strong>year</strong>s are attributed to stunt<strong>in</strong>g, severe wast<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e growth retardation. Long term consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

early stages <strong>of</strong> child growth and development <strong>in</strong>clude likelihood <strong>of</strong> short stature <strong>in</strong><br />

adult life, low educational achievements, giv<strong>in</strong>g birth to smaller <strong>children</strong>, lower<br />

economic status and reduced physical work capacity and productivity <strong>in</strong> adulthood 5 .<br />

Further, the country is pass<strong>in</strong>g through a phase <strong>of</strong> rapid socio-economic<br />

transition lead<strong>in</strong>g to over nutrition <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> segments <strong>of</strong> the population, especially <strong>in</strong><br />

the urban communities. Chang<strong>in</strong>g lifestyles and dietary habits are contribut<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> overweight/obesity among <strong>children</strong> and young adults<br />

expos<strong>in</strong>g them to the risk <strong>of</strong> chronic degenerative disorders such as hypertension,<br />

Type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, stroke, cancers etc <strong>in</strong> the later part <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

More over <strong>under</strong>nutrition dur<strong>in</strong>g early childhood can lead to overweight/obesity <strong>in</strong><br />

adulthood, a risk factor for diet related chronic diseases 6 .<br />

The major nutritional problems <strong>of</strong> public health significance <strong>in</strong> the country are,<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> energy malnutrition (PEM), vitam<strong>in</strong> A deficiency (VAD), iron deficiency<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


anaemia (IDA) and iod<strong>in</strong>e deficiency disorders (IDD). Preschool <strong>children</strong>, adolescent<br />

girls, women <strong>of</strong> reproductive age group, elderly, those belong<strong>in</strong>g to socioeconomically<br />

backward groups such as scheduled caste and schedule tribe<br />

communities, communities resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> chronically drought affected <strong>rural</strong> areas are<br />

nutritionally the most vulnerable segments <strong>of</strong> the populations.<br />

Several nutrition programmes have been designed and are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

implemented <strong>in</strong> India, through respective State Governments, dur<strong>in</strong>g the past few<br />

decades for the prevention and control <strong>of</strong> both macro and micronutrient malnutrition<br />

<strong>in</strong> the population. They <strong>in</strong>clude supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g through ICDS, distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

iron and folic acid tablets, massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A supplementation, Mid-day meal<br />

programme etc. Also, several poverty alleviation and developmental programmes<br />

are be<strong>in</strong>g implemented by central and State governments, for the overall<br />

socioeconomic development <strong>of</strong> the communities. In addition, Public Distribution<br />

System and TPDS are striv<strong>in</strong>g to provide essential commodities at affordable price,<br />

especially to those below poverty l<strong>in</strong>e throughout the <strong>year</strong>, all over the country, to<br />

ensure household food security.<br />

Children, who are subjected to socio-economic and dietary constra<strong>in</strong>ts dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

their critical <strong>year</strong>s <strong>of</strong> growth and development, end up as adults with small body size.<br />

Such adults may be apparently healthy, but there is evidence to suggest that their<br />

productivity and earn<strong>in</strong>g capacity are impaired (Satyanarayana and Naidu, 1977 7 ).<br />

Repeat surveys by National Nutrition Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Bureau (1999 8 ) <strong>in</strong> eight States<br />

revealed that, despite very little or no change <strong>in</strong> the dietary <strong>in</strong>takes <strong>of</strong> <strong>rural</strong> population<br />

over a period <strong>of</strong> time, there was a decrease <strong>in</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> severe forms <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>under</strong>nutrition among young <strong>children</strong> with concomitant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> normal grades.<br />

However, the proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> with mild to moderate <strong>under</strong>nutrition rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

similar. Recent survey carried out by NNMB (2006 9 ) <strong>in</strong> the <strong>rural</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e States<br />

revealed that about 40% <strong>under</strong> 5 <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> were <strong>under</strong>weight, 45% were stunted<br />

and 20% were wasted. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g figures for the State <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh<br />

were, 46%, 59% and 24% respectively.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to NFHS-3 10 , <strong>in</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, 60% <strong>of</strong>


ecommended several action programmes <strong>in</strong> its National Plan <strong>of</strong> Action on Nutrition<br />

(1995) 12 . Though, the Government <strong>of</strong> India and the respective State Governments<br />

have been implement<strong>in</strong>g several health, nutrition <strong>in</strong>tervention and developmental<br />

programmes through its National Nutrition Policy and National Plan <strong>of</strong> Action on<br />

Nutrition for overall improvement <strong>of</strong> health and nutrition status <strong>of</strong> the community, the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be significantly high.<br />

The type and magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition may vary from district to district,<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g on geographical and agro-climatic conditions and therefore, warrant<br />

region-specific <strong>in</strong>terventions. In order to devise and implement area specific<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention strategies and to monitor their impact over a period, it is necessary to<br />

generate data base at district level.<br />

In this context, the Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh is contemplat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

develop State Nutrition Policy and develop plan <strong>of</strong> action for implementation, <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to improve the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the communities. Therefore, at the request <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Women & Child Development, Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, the<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition carried out survey <strong>in</strong> all the follow<strong>in</strong>g 50 districts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

State, to assess the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong> 5 <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> and <strong>in</strong>fant and young child<br />

feed<strong>in</strong>g practices.<br />

Sl.<br />

Sl.<br />

Sl.<br />

Sl.<br />

Sl.<br />

District<br />

District<br />

District<br />

District<br />

No.<br />

No<br />

No.<br />

No<br />

No<br />

District<br />

1 Alirajpur 11 Ch<strong>in</strong>dwara 21 Indore 31 Neemuch 41 Shadol<br />

2 Annppur 12 Damoh 22 Jabalpur 32 Panna 42 Shajapur<br />

3 Ashokngar 13 Datia 23 Jhabua 33 Raisen 43 Sheopur<br />

4 Balaghat 14 Dewas 24 Katni 34 Rajgarh 44 Sidhi<br />

5 Barwani 15 Dhar 25 Khandwa 35 Ratlam 45 S<strong>in</strong>grauli<br />

6 Betul 16 D<strong>in</strong>dori 26 Khargone 36 Rewa 46 Shivpuri<br />

7 Bh<strong>in</strong>d 17 Guna 27 Mandla 37 Sagar 47 Tikamgarh<br />

8 Bhopal 18 Gwalior 28 Mandsaur 38 Sathna 48 Ujja<strong>in</strong><br />

9 Burhanpur 19 Harda 29 Morena 39 Sehore 49 Umaria<br />

10 Chhatarpur 20 Hoshangabad 30 Narsimhapur 40 Seoni 50 Vidisha<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the study carried out <strong>in</strong> Seoni district <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh State<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g February-August 2010, is presented <strong>in</strong> this report.<br />

1.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Seoni District<br />

The Seoni district is primarily a tribal dom<strong>in</strong>ated district. The name Seoni has<br />

the orig<strong>in</strong> from the word “SEONA” a tree, which was commonly found <strong>in</strong> this area.<br />

The wood <strong>of</strong> the tree is used <strong>in</strong> manufacture <strong>of</strong> DHOLAK. The district is situated on a<br />

narrow, north-south section <strong>of</strong> Satpura plateau <strong>in</strong> the south <strong>of</strong> Jabalpur. Seoni is rich<br />

<strong>in</strong> timber resources. The district covers a total area <strong>of</strong> 8758 sq. km. The total<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the district is 11,66,608 (2001 census), with a population density <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


133/sq.km. About 90% <strong>of</strong> the population was <strong>rural</strong> and 10% was urban. The<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> Scheduled Tribe population was 37%. The district has a sex ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

981. The overall literacy rate is 65.9% with 77.5% for males and 54.1% for females.<br />

The primary occupation <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>in</strong> the district is agriculture<br />

and allied activities. About 43.2% <strong>of</strong> the total land is <strong>under</strong> agriculture but only 11.9%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the land is double cropped and 11% <strong>of</strong> the land is <strong>under</strong> assured source <strong>of</strong><br />

irrigation. By and large the agricultural practice followed <strong>in</strong> the district is <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

type and is <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able nature.<br />

2. OBJECTIVES<br />

2.1 General Objective<br />

The general objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to assess the health and nutritional<br />

status <strong>of</strong>


3.1.2 Selection <strong>of</strong> Villages<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> survey, <strong>in</strong> each district, a total <strong>of</strong> 20 villages were selected,<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g systematic random procedure, cover<strong>in</strong>g all the taluks/blocks based on<br />

Population Proportion to Size <strong>of</strong> the village.<br />

3.1.3 Selection <strong>of</strong> Households<br />

In each <strong>of</strong> the selected villages, a total <strong>of</strong> 20 households (HHs) hav<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

least one <strong>in</strong>dex child <strong>of</strong>


3.2.3 Cl<strong>in</strong>ical exam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

All the <strong>children</strong> covered for anthropometry were exam<strong>in</strong>ed cl<strong>in</strong>ically for the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> signs <strong>of</strong> nutritional deficiency.<br />

3.2.4 History <strong>of</strong> Morbidity<br />

Information on history <strong>of</strong> morbidity among the <strong>children</strong> such as fever,<br />

respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection, diarrhoea etc., if any, dur<strong>in</strong>g the preced<strong>in</strong>g 15 days <strong>of</strong> visit was<br />

collected.<br />

3.2.5 Maternal Particulars<br />

Maternal particulars such as parity, antenatal care, TT immunization, receipt<br />

<strong>of</strong> IFA tablets, particulars <strong>of</strong> delivery and record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> birth weight were collected on<br />

mothers <strong>of</strong>


pr<strong>of</strong>iciency <strong>in</strong> local language were recruited, tra<strong>in</strong>ed and standardized <strong>in</strong> various<br />

survey methodologies, by the scientists from the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition. All<br />

the survey <strong>in</strong>struments (pr<strong>of</strong>ormae) were developed, translated <strong>in</strong>to H<strong>in</strong>di vernacular<br />

and pre-tested before be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong> the survey. Data was collected <strong>in</strong> each district<br />

by two teams.<br />

3.4 Quality Control<br />

Random checks were carried out by scientists from NIN, periodically by<br />

revisit<strong>in</strong>g the households surveyed by the field staff, to ensure quality <strong>of</strong> data<br />

collection.<br />

3.5 Data Analysis<br />

The data was scrut<strong>in</strong>ized and entered <strong>in</strong>to the computers as soon as it was<br />

received at NIN. The data clean<strong>in</strong>g was done by carry<strong>in</strong>g out range and consistency<br />

checks. Descriptive and analytical statistics <strong>of</strong> the data were carried out us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS<br />

W<strong>in</strong>dows version 15.0. Appropriate statistical tools were used wherever needed.<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

4.1 Coverage<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 399 households from 20 villages were covered for the study (Table<br />

1). A total <strong>of</strong> 508 <strong>children</strong> (Boys:264; Girls:244)


4.2.2 Type <strong>of</strong> family<br />

About 52% were nuclear families and 32% jo<strong>in</strong>t were while the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 16%<br />

were extended nuclear families.<br />

4.2.3 Family size<br />

The average family size was 5.5. About 33% <strong>of</strong> the HHs had family size <strong>of</strong> ≤<br />

4 members, 63% <strong>of</strong> HHs had 5-9 and 4% <strong>of</strong> HHs had ≥10 members.<br />

4.2.4 Literacy status <strong>of</strong> father<br />

About 74% <strong>of</strong> the fathers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>children</strong> were literates. About 27% had<br />

an education level <strong>of</strong> 1-5 th class; about 37% had school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 6 th -10 th class, 10%<br />

studied up to <strong>in</strong>termediate and graduation or above.<br />

4.2.5 Literacy status <strong>of</strong> mother<br />

About 65% <strong>of</strong> the mothers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>children</strong> were literates. About 32% <strong>of</strong><br />

them had an education level <strong>of</strong> 1-5 th class, 27% were educated up to 6 th -10 th class,<br />

while very few (about 5%) had education level <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediate or above.<br />

4.2.6 Household landhold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

About 34% <strong>of</strong> households did not posses any agricultural land, about 19%<br />

were large farmers (≥ 5 acres) 27% were small farmers (2.5 - 5 acres), while 20%<br />

were marg<strong>in</strong>al farmers (


4.3.2 Household amenities<br />

The major source <strong>of</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water was from tube well (65%), followed by<br />

open well (27%), while only 8% <strong>of</strong> the households had access to tap water. About<br />

99% <strong>of</strong> HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g firewood, 83% <strong>of</strong> the houses were electrified. About 5% <strong>of</strong><br />

the HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g sanitary latr<strong>in</strong>e. Only about one third <strong>of</strong> the HHs (33%) had<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> separate kitchen.<br />

4.4 Iod<strong>in</strong>e content <strong>of</strong> Cook<strong>in</strong>g salt<br />

The distribution <strong>of</strong> HHs accord<strong>in</strong>g to iod<strong>in</strong>e content <strong>of</strong> cook<strong>in</strong>g salt as estimated<br />

by spot test<strong>in</strong>g kit is presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4. It was observed that 54% <strong>of</strong> the HHs were<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g rock salt and 44% us<strong>in</strong>g free flow<strong>in</strong>g salt. About 43% <strong>of</strong> HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

adequately iodized (≥15 ppm) salt, while 57% <strong>of</strong> the HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g non-iodized<br />

salt.<br />

4.5 Maternal characteristics<br />

4.5.1 Age and parity <strong>of</strong> mother<br />

About 86% <strong>of</strong> mothers were between 20- 29 <strong>year</strong>s <strong>of</strong> age, while 13% were <strong>in</strong><br />

the age group <strong>of</strong> 30-39 <strong>year</strong>s. About 26% mothers were primi, 39% had 2 <strong>children</strong><br />

and 29% had 3-4 <strong>children</strong>, while 5% had ≥5 <strong>children</strong> (Table 5).<br />

4.5.2 Particulars <strong>of</strong> last Pregnancy (mothers hav<strong>in</strong>g


4.5.3 Particulars <strong>of</strong> last Delivery (Mothers hav<strong>in</strong>g


70<br />

60<br />

%<br />

Fig.1 Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0-11 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> Initiation <strong>of</strong> Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g (BF)<br />

69.7<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

18.6<br />

10.5<br />

1.2 0<br />


The foods generally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the complementary feeds were cereals &<br />

millets, pulses and fruits (86% each). About 71% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> received 3-5<br />

complementary feeds per day, while the rest (14%) received 2 feeds a day. About<br />

86% <strong>of</strong> mothers fed the <strong>in</strong>fants with their hand. . The feed<strong>in</strong>g was supervised mostly<br />

by the mother (84%) or grand parents (2%) (Table 12).<br />

4.6.2.2 12-35 month <strong>children</strong><br />

About 67% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were currently receiv<strong>in</strong>g complementary foods <strong>in</strong> addition<br />

to breast milk, 33% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were not breastfed. The type <strong>of</strong> food be<strong>in</strong>g currently<br />

given <strong>in</strong>cluded cow/buffalo milk (100%), home made semi-solids and/or solids<br />

(99.5%). The most commonly used food groups <strong>in</strong>cluded cereals & millets, pulses,<br />

GLV, other vegetables, roots & tubers, fruits , Milk & milk products and fats &<br />

oils(97-100%). About 45% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were fed ≥ 4 times a day, 50% were fed 3<br />

times a day, while 5% were fed ≤ 2 times a day. About 56% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong><br />

consumed food themselves mostly with hands (55%) or with spoon (1%). About<br />

44% <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> were fed by their mothers, either by hand (43%) or with spoon (1%).<br />

In most cases, feed<strong>in</strong>g was supervised by their mothers (99.5%), followed by grand<br />

parents (0.5%) (Table 13).<br />

4.6.3 Care <strong>of</strong> the Child<br />

About 38% <strong>of</strong> mothers reportedly were tak<strong>in</strong>g care <strong>of</strong> their <strong>children</strong> by themselves at<br />

home; while 33% stated that they were carry the child to work spot. (Table 14). About<br />

23% looked after by grand parents.<br />

4.6.4 Personal Hygiene<br />

Less than 1% <strong>of</strong> mothers washed their hands with soap before feed<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

child. About 39% <strong>of</strong> mothers were us<strong>in</strong>g soap for wash<strong>in</strong>g their hands after<br />

defecation (Table 14).<br />

4.6.5 History <strong>of</strong> Morbidity<br />

The particulars <strong>of</strong> morbidity dur<strong>in</strong>g preced<strong>in</strong>g fortnight among


<strong>children</strong>. Similarly, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> fever was maximum <strong>in</strong> 6-11 months <strong>in</strong>fants (25%)<br />

and tended to decrease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g age to 14% <strong>in</strong> the age group <strong>of</strong> 36-47 months.<br />

A majority <strong>of</strong> the mothers <strong>in</strong> general stated that, they consult a private practitioner<br />

(54%), or visit the PHC (45%), when the <strong>children</strong> fall sick, (Table 16). About 8% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>children</strong> reportedly had diarrhoea dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous fortnight, while less than 1%<br />

received ORS, either home made (0.2%) or that given by ANM/AWW (0.6%) About 8%<br />

the <strong>children</strong> reportedly had acute respiratory <strong>in</strong>fection, less than 1% had received cotrimoxazole.<br />

4.6.6 Participation <strong>in</strong> ICDS Supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g Programme.<br />

About 91% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong> 6-59 months age group were participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

ICDS supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g programme, with 63% be<strong>in</strong>g regular. The extent <strong>of</strong><br />

participation was observed to be high (98%) among 36-59 months and 85% among<br />

6-35 months age group (Table 17). A higher proportion <strong>of</strong> older <strong>children</strong> were regular<br />

(86%), than younger counterparts (46%).<br />

4.6.7 Coverage for Immunization <strong>under</strong> UIP<br />

The particulars <strong>of</strong> coverage <strong>of</strong> 12-24 months <strong>children</strong> for immunization <strong>under</strong><br />

Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) dur<strong>in</strong>g the first <strong>year</strong> <strong>of</strong> life are provided <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 18 and Fig. 3. About 96% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were fully immunized, 1% were<br />

partially immunized, while about 3% did not receive any immunization. About 98%<br />

received polio, DPT & BCG vacc<strong>in</strong>es, while 97% received measles vacc<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

Major source <strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong>formation was from mother and child protection card (37%),<br />

followed by parents (31%), anganwadi record (20%) and immunization card (10%). The<br />

major reason for not immunized or partially immunized was “mother was busy”.<br />

4.6.8 Coverage for Massive dose <strong>of</strong> Vitam<strong>in</strong> A Supplementation<br />

The National programme on Prevention and control <strong>of</strong> bl<strong>in</strong>dness due to Vitam<strong>in</strong><br />

A deficiency envisages that all the <strong>children</strong> between 9 to 60 months should receive<br />

biannual massive dose <strong>of</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A. The particulars <strong>of</strong> coverage <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> for<br />

massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous one <strong>year</strong> are provided <strong>in</strong> Table 19. In<br />

general, about 94% <strong>of</strong> 9-59 months <strong>children</strong> reportedly received at least one dose <strong>of</strong><br />

vitam<strong>in</strong> A. While the coverage was 96% among 18-59 months <strong>children</strong>, only 85% <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong> 9-17months received massive dose <strong>of</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A. About 61% <strong>of</strong> 18-35<br />

months <strong>children</strong> and 73% <strong>of</strong> 36-59 months <strong>children</strong> received 2 doses dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

preced<strong>in</strong>g one <strong>year</strong>. In a majority <strong>of</strong> cases, the massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A was<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istered at AWC (93%), mostly by ANM (60%) or AWW (33%). The major<br />

reasons for non-receipt <strong>of</strong> massive dose <strong>of</strong> Vitam<strong>in</strong> A were ‘not <strong>of</strong>fered’ (27.9%).<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


%<br />

100<br />

Fig. 3 Coverage (%) <strong>of</strong> 12-24 months Children for Immunization <strong>under</strong><br />

Universal Immunization Program (UIP)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

97.5 97.5 97.5<br />

97.5<br />

97.5 97.5 97.5 96.6<br />

96.6<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0.9 2.5<br />

0<br />

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 OPV1 OPV2 OPV3 Measles Full Imm. Partial<br />

Imm.<br />

Not imm.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


4.6.9 Coverage for Iron and Folic acid tablets Supplementation<br />

About 4% <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong> 12-59 months reportedly received IFA tablets dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

preced<strong>in</strong>g <strong>year</strong>, mostly from AWW. Only 0.2% received ≥ 90 IFA tablets and<br />

consumed the same (Table 20).<br />

4.7 <strong>Nutritional</strong> status <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> (


20<br />

16<br />

Fig.4 Distance charts for Weights - Boys<br />

Median Wt - WHO Standards<br />

Mean Wt - Current Study<br />

Wt (Kgs)<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12-17<br />

18-23<br />

24-29<br />

30-35<br />

36-41<br />

42-47<br />

48-53<br />

54-59<br />

Age (Months)<br />

20<br />

16<br />

Fig.5 Distance charts for Weights - Girls<br />

Median Wt - WHO Standards<br />

Mean Wt - Current Study<br />

Wt (Kgs)<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

Age (Months)<br />

12-17<br />

18-23<br />

24-29<br />

30-35<br />

36-41<br />

42-47<br />

48-53<br />

54-59<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


120<br />

100<br />

Fig.6 Distance charts for Heights - Boys<br />

Meadian Ht-WHO standards<br />

Mean Ht -Current Study<br />

80<br />

Ht (Cms)<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12-17<br />

18-23<br />

24-29<br />

30-35<br />

36-41<br />

42-47<br />

48-53<br />

54-59<br />

Age (Months)<br />

120<br />

100<br />

Fig.7 Distance charts for Heights - Girls<br />

Meadian Ht-WHO standards<br />

Mean Ht -Current Study<br />

80<br />

Ht (Cms)<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

Age (Months)<br />

12-17<br />

18-23<br />

24-29<br />

30-35<br />

36-41<br />

42-47<br />

48-53<br />

54-59<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Fig.8 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


moderate stunt<strong>in</strong>g (- 3SD to - 2SD) was about 29%. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> stunt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased with <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> age, from about 21% <strong>in</strong> the age group <strong>of</strong> 6-11 months,<br />

through 49% <strong>in</strong> 24-35 months and decreased to 38% <strong>in</strong> 48-59 months age group<br />

(Table 23, Fig.8). The prevalence was significantly (p


Fig.10 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


Family size<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>weight was observed to be significantly (p


Fig.11 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


Fig.13 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


‘housewives’/‘other’ (37%). On the other hand, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> wast<strong>in</strong>g was found<br />

to be higher among ‘cultivators’ (41%), compared to ‘housewives’/‘others’ (31%) and<br />

‘labour’ (27%). However, none <strong>of</strong> the differences were found to be statistically<br />

significant.<br />

Per Capita Income (Rs.)<br />

No significant association was observed between <strong>under</strong>nutrition and PCI<br />

(Fig. 15).<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> house<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>weight and stunt<strong>in</strong>g was higher among the <strong>children</strong><br />

from families liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> pucca houses (88% and 50% respectively) as compared to<br />

either semi pucca (52% and 39% respectively) or kutcha houses (53% and 47%<br />

respectively). These differences were not statistically significant. The prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

wast<strong>in</strong>g was significantly (p


Fig.15 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition ` among


Separate Kitchen<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> stunt<strong>in</strong>g though not statistically significant was higher<br />

among <strong>children</strong> from HHs who did not have separate kitchen (42%) compared to<br />

those hav<strong>in</strong>g separate kitchen (36%). The prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>weight and wast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was comparable between the groups.<br />

History <strong>of</strong> Morbidity dur<strong>in</strong>g preced<strong>in</strong>g fortnight<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> overall <strong>under</strong>weight and wast<strong>in</strong>g was marg<strong>in</strong>ally higher<br />

among <strong>children</strong> with history <strong>of</strong> morbidity (such as fever, diarrhoea, respiratory<br />

<strong>in</strong>fections etc) <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g fortnight (55% and 35% respectively) compared to<br />

those <strong>children</strong> with no history <strong>of</strong> morbidity (52% and 27% respectively).<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

National population policy 2000 envisaged that about 80% <strong>of</strong> deliveries should<br />

be Institutional and 100% should be conducted by tra<strong>in</strong>ed personnel 16 . The study<br />

revealed that about 97% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women had <strong>under</strong>gone antenatal check-ups.<br />

However, only 53% had <strong>under</strong>gone the m<strong>in</strong>imum 3 ANCs. Cent per cent <strong>of</strong> women<br />

received TT immunization <strong>in</strong> the Seoni district <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

NFHS-3 survey, about 80% <strong>of</strong> the pregnant women had <strong>under</strong>gone ANC <strong>in</strong> the state<br />

<strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh 10 . About 79% deliveries took place either <strong>in</strong> Government or<br />

Private hospitals and about 76% were conducted by medical doctors. This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

encourag<strong>in</strong>g, as majority <strong>of</strong> the deliveries were conducted by tra<strong>in</strong>ed medical<br />

personnel.<br />

Birth weights were recorded <strong>in</strong> about 83% <strong>of</strong> the newborns, but the records<br />

were available for 73% <strong>of</strong> them. The proportion <strong>of</strong> low birth weight (LBW) was about<br />

10% <strong>in</strong> the district. The birth weight <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant is the s<strong>in</strong>gle most important<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> new born survival and <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. Low birth weight<br />

<strong>in</strong>fants are at <strong>in</strong>creased risk <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g malnourished at one <strong>year</strong> <strong>of</strong> age, become<br />

victims <strong>of</strong> “<strong>in</strong>fection-malnutrition cycle” which leads to further physical stunt<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

impaired growth and development 17 . In addition, <strong>children</strong> born with <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

growth retardation are at a higher risk <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g overweight/obesity and<br />

associated chronic degenerative disorders dur<strong>in</strong>g adulthood 6 .<br />

Infant and young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices have a significant impact on child<br />

health and survival. Appropriate feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g early and exclusive breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and optimal complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g practices such as right time <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation, right<br />

type and quantity <strong>of</strong> complementary foods and frequency <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is important for proper physical growth and mental development <strong>of</strong> the child. In its<br />

policy statements, the American Academy <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics (1997) 18 stated that the<br />

mother’s milk is uniquely superior for <strong>in</strong>fant feed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Epidemiological research showed that mother’s milk and breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>fants provides advantages with regard to general health, growth and development<br />

while significantly decreas<strong>in</strong>g risk for a large number <strong>of</strong> acute and chronic diseases.<br />

In this study, breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g was the common practice among the mothers. About<br />

10% <strong>of</strong> the mothers reportedly <strong>in</strong>itiated breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> one hour after delivery<br />

which is lower than that reported by NFHS-3 (16%), while 70% <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />

between 1-3 hours. This figure is higher than that reported by the NFHS-3 for the<br />

State (58%). Pre-lacteals were given <strong>in</strong> about 6% <strong>of</strong> the newborns. Pre-lacteal feeds<br />

might harm the immature gut <strong>of</strong> the child, especially if they are contam<strong>in</strong>ated. These<br />

undesirable newborn feed<strong>in</strong>g practices observed <strong>in</strong> the district is a matter <strong>of</strong> concern<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


and requires due attention because, early <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> breast feed<strong>in</strong>g is the primary<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> maternal milk production and secretion. Avoidance <strong>of</strong> other fluids or<br />

foods is essential to optimize breast milk <strong>in</strong>take by the newborn. Most <strong>of</strong> the other<br />

fluids or foods are less nutritious than breast milk and therefore, if displacement<br />

occurs, the <strong>in</strong>fant may be at a nutritional disadvantage even if prepared<br />

hygienically 19 . In many communities, it is traditionally believed that colostrum is<br />

unhealthy and therefore is harmful to the baby. However <strong>in</strong> the present study,<br />

colostrum was given by cent percent <strong>of</strong> the mothers which is good for the child’s<br />

health and nutrition and such desirable practices should be encouraged <strong>in</strong> the<br />

community.<br />

Breast milk can contribute significantly as a source <strong>of</strong> energy, fat, high quality<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> and micronutrients, especially when the quality <strong>of</strong> available complementary<br />

food is low (Academy <strong>of</strong> Educational Development, 1999 19 ). WHO 20 and UNICEF<br />

(1993a 21 ) recommends that complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g should be <strong>in</strong>itiated immediately<br />

after 6 months <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fant’s age and breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g should be cont<strong>in</strong>ued well <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the second <strong>year</strong> <strong>of</strong> life and for longer duration, if possible. In this study, the mothers<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued to breastfeed for a longer duration (up to 2 <strong>year</strong>s), however undesirable<br />

complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g practices appear to be significant <strong>in</strong> the district <strong>of</strong> Seoni <strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation and frequency <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g was unduly delayed. About 86% <strong>of</strong><br />

the 6-11 months <strong>children</strong> were gett<strong>in</strong>g complementary feeds, while only 45% started<br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g the same at the age <strong>of</strong> 6 months. The complementary foods be<strong>in</strong>g given<br />

mostly <strong>in</strong>cluded cow/buffalo milk and home made semi-solids. The frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

feed<strong>in</strong>g was at least 3 times <strong>in</strong> 71% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fants. Effective immunization<br />

programme aga<strong>in</strong>st the common communicable diseases are required for the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> the susceptible populations particularly <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries,<br />

where<strong>in</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> disability or death from preventable <strong>in</strong>fectious diseases is a<br />

matter <strong>of</strong> concern. Therefore, coverage <strong>under</strong> universal immunization programme<br />

should be 100%. It has been observed <strong>in</strong> this study that 97% were fully immunized.<br />

The programme for prevention <strong>of</strong> bl<strong>in</strong>dness due to vitam<strong>in</strong> A deficiency<br />

envisages distribution <strong>of</strong> massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A to all the <strong>children</strong> aged between<br />

9-59 months, every 6 months. It was observed that about 85% <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> between<br />

9-17 months and 96% <strong>children</strong> between 18-59 months received at least one dose<br />

vitam<strong>in</strong> A dur<strong>in</strong>g previous one <strong>year</strong>. Only about 61% <strong>of</strong> 18-35 months <strong>children</strong> and<br />

73% <strong>of</strong> 36-59 months <strong>children</strong> received the suggested two doses dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

preced<strong>in</strong>g one <strong>year</strong>. The coverage for iron-folic acid supplementation was very low<br />

(4%), while only 0.2% received ≥ 90 tablets <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g, poor coverage. There is a<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


need to strengthen the service delivery and monitor<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms for these<br />

programmes.<br />

The common morbidities such as ARI, fever and diarrhoea were reported by the<br />

mothers with the prevalence be<strong>in</strong>g higher <strong>in</strong> the younger age group (6-23 months)<br />

compared to the older age group (24-59 months). The probable reasons for this<br />

could be due to the prevail<strong>in</strong>g suboptimal <strong>in</strong>fant and young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices<br />

coupled with non-receipt <strong>of</strong> appropriate health care management.<br />

Consumption <strong>of</strong> adequately iodized salt (>15 ppm) is lower <strong>in</strong> the district (43%)<br />

compared to figures reported for National (51%) but was higher compared to State<br />

(36%) (NFHS-3). <strong>Nutritional</strong> status <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants and young <strong>children</strong> is not only a vital<br />

health issue, but it is also central to susta<strong>in</strong>able growth and development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

child 22 .In the present study, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>weight, stunt<strong>in</strong>g and wast<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

53%, 40% and 30% respectively. It was observed that the nutritional status <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>children</strong> deteriorated as age advances especially from six months onwards.<br />

Undernutrition <strong>in</strong> all its three forms cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be a significant problem <strong>in</strong> the<br />

district <strong>of</strong> Seoni, Probably, factors such as, the energy and nutrient density <strong>of</strong> the<br />

complementary foods given, the frequency and variety <strong>of</strong> foods <strong>of</strong>fered, hygiene<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> food preparation, personal hygiene, the amount <strong>of</strong> breast milk consumed<br />

at different stages <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g, the frequency <strong>of</strong> breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>in</strong>appropriate complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g and after illness may have an important<br />

contributory role for the observed high prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition <strong>in</strong> the district.<br />

The study revealed significant association between nutritional status and<br />

different socio-economic variables, which <strong>in</strong>dicate higher rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition <strong>in</strong><br />

the households <strong>of</strong> vulnerable sections <strong>of</strong> society (SC & ST), among <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

illiterate fathers, family size and type <strong>of</strong> house. Promotion <strong>of</strong> better <strong>in</strong>fant and young<br />

child feed<strong>in</strong>g and health care practices is needed for improv<strong>in</strong>g the health and<br />

nutritional status <strong>of</strong> young <strong>children</strong>. Last but not least there is a need to strengthen<br />

the programmes for <strong>in</strong>come generation to enhance the household food and nutrition<br />

security.<br />

- o0o -<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


REFERENCES<br />

1. de Onis M, Blossner M, Borghi E, Frongillo EA, Morris R. Estimates <strong>of</strong> global<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> childhood <strong>under</strong>weight <strong>in</strong> 1990 and 2015. JAMA 2004;<br />

291:2600-6.<br />

2. Black,RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA etal. Meternal and child <strong>under</strong>nutrition: global<br />

and regional exposures and health consequencies. Lancet 2008; 371: 243-260<br />

3. Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE etal. How many child deaths can we prevent<br />

this <strong>year</strong> Lancet 2003; 362: 65-71.<br />

4. Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA etal. Delayed breast feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiation<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases risk <strong>of</strong> neonatal mortality. Pediatrics 2006; 117: e380-e386.<br />

5. Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal PC, Martorell R, Ritcher L and Sachdev HS.<br />

Maternal and child <strong>under</strong>nutrition: Consequences for adult health and human<br />

capital. The Lancet 2008; 371:340-57.<br />

6. Barker DJP, Osmond C, Forsen TJ, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. Trajectories <strong>of</strong><br />

growth among <strong>children</strong>who have coronary Events as Adults. N Eng J Med<br />

2005; 353:1802-9<br />

7. Satyanarayana K., Naidu AN., Chatterjee B., Rao BSN. Body size and work<br />

output. Am. J. Cl<strong>in</strong>. Nutr. 1977; 30:322-325.<br />

8. National Nutrition Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Bureau: Report <strong>of</strong> Second Repeat Survey –<br />

Rural. NNMB Tech. Rep. No. 18, 1999.<br />

9. National Nutrition Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Bureau. Diet and nutritional status <strong>of</strong> <strong>rural</strong><br />

population. NNMB Tech. Rep. No.24, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition (ICMR),<br />

Hyderabad, 2006<br />

10. National Family Health Survey 2005-06.<br />

11. M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development, Government <strong>of</strong> India, National<br />

Nutrition Policy, New Delhi: Department <strong>of</strong> Women and Child Development,<br />

1993.National Plan <strong>of</strong> action<br />

12. M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development, Government <strong>of</strong> India, National Plan<br />

<strong>of</strong> Action on Nutrition, New Delhi: Food and Nutrition Board, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Women and Child Development, 1995.<br />

13. Jelliffee D.B. <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> nutritional status <strong>of</strong> community. WHO Monograph<br />

series No.53, 1966.<br />

14. World Health Organization. Measur<strong>in</strong>g change <strong>in</strong> nutritional status, WHO,<br />

Geneva, 1983.<br />

15. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth<br />

Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006;<br />

450:76-85.<br />

16. www.who<strong>in</strong>dia.org/EIP/policy/population...<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


17. Black RE, L<strong>in</strong>dsay HA, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, Mercedes de Onis, Majid<br />

Ezzati, Col<strong>in</strong> Mathers, Juan Rivera. Meternal and child <strong>under</strong> nutrition: Global<br />

and regional exposures and health consequences. Maternal and child <strong>under</strong><br />

nutrition study group. The Lancet, 2008; 371:340-357.<br />

18. American Academy <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics. Breast-feed<strong>in</strong>g and the use <strong>of</strong> Human milk<br />

American Academy <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics, Work Group on Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g. Pediatr<br />

1997; 100:1035-1039.<br />

19. Academy <strong>of</strong> educational development. Recommended feed<strong>in</strong>g and dietary<br />

practices to improve <strong>in</strong>fant and maternal nutrition. L<strong>in</strong>kages – Improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nutrition and reproductive health. 1999.<br />

20. The optimal duration <strong>of</strong> exclusive breast-feed<strong>in</strong>g. Report <strong>of</strong> an Expert<br />

Consultation, WHO, Geneva, 2001.<br />

21. UNICEF. Breast feed<strong>in</strong>g facts <strong>of</strong> life. UNICEF (1993a).<br />

22. Dewey KG, He<strong>in</strong>ig MJ, Nommsen LA, Lonnerdal B. Adequacy <strong>of</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>take<br />

among breast-fed <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> the DARLING study: relationship to growth<br />

velocity, morbidity and activity levels. Davis Area Research on Lactation, Infant<br />

Nutrition and Growth. J Pediatr.1991; 119:538-47.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


TABLES


Table - 1<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> Coverage<br />

Particulars<br />

Coverage (n)<br />

Socio-economic particulars (HHs) 399<br />

Under 5 <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> for anthropometry<br />

508<br />

(Boys:264, Girls:244)<br />

Children below 12 months 86<br />

Children 12-35 months 215<br />

Children 36-59 months 207<br />

Spot test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> HHs salt for iod<strong>in</strong>e 399<br />

Infant & young child Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Mothers with


Table - 2<br />

Socio-economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Households <strong>of</strong> Index <strong>children</strong><br />

Community<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Family<br />

Family Size<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 2 (Contd…)<br />

Socio-economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Households <strong>of</strong> Index <strong>children</strong><br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 399<br />

Extent <strong>of</strong> HH landhold<strong>in</strong>g (Acres)<br />

Nil 34.4<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>al farmers


Table - 3<br />

Physical facilities <strong>of</strong> the Households<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> house<br />

Particulars<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Cook<strong>in</strong>g Fuel<br />

Percent<br />

n 399<br />

Kutcha 16.5<br />

Semi Pucca 82.2<br />

Pucca 1.3<br />

Open Well 26.8<br />

Tube Well 64.7<br />

Tap 8.0<br />

Stream or River 0.5<br />

Firewood 99.2<br />

Kerosene 0.5<br />

Bio- Gas -<br />

LPG 0.3<br />

Household electricity present 83.0<br />

Sanitary Latr<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Present and <strong>in</strong> use 5.0<br />

Present and not <strong>in</strong> use 2.3<br />

Absent 92.7<br />

Separate Kitchen Present 32.8<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 4<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> HHs accord<strong>in</strong>g to use <strong>of</strong> Iodized salt and iod<strong>in</strong>e content<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> salt used<br />

Iod<strong>in</strong>e Content<br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 399<br />

Powdered salt 0.3<br />

Crystal salt 1.0<br />

Rock salt 54.3<br />

Free-flow<strong>in</strong>g 44.4<br />

0 ppm 56.9<br />


Table - 6<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> last pregnancy <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> < 6 months <strong>children</strong><br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> 24 weeks 13.3<br />

Not availed ANC 3.3<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> ANC<br />

Home 3.3<br />

AWC 40.1<br />

Sub-centre -<br />

PHC/CHC 20.0<br />

Taluk/Dist.hospital 10.0<br />

Private Cl<strong>in</strong>ic 23.3<br />

Not availed ANC 3.3<br />

ANC conducted by<br />

ANM 43.3<br />

Medical Officer 26.7<br />

Pvt. Doctor 26.7<br />

Not availed ANC 3.3<br />

( Contd..)<br />

Seoni Dist.- Madhya Pradesh


Table – 6 (Contd…)<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> last pregnancy <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> < 6 months <strong>children</strong><br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 30<br />

Components <strong>of</strong> ANC*<br />

Physical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation 96.7<br />

Weight Record<strong>in</strong>g 93.3<br />

Ur<strong>in</strong>e Test 66.7<br />

Haemoglob<strong>in</strong> Estimation 60.0<br />

Blood pressure measurement 60.0<br />

Health & Nutrition advise given dur<strong>in</strong>g ANC<br />

Yes 86.7<br />

No 10.0<br />

Not availed ANC 3.3<br />

If yes, what advise*<br />

To attend for regular checkups 86.7<br />

To consume more GLVs 86.7<br />

To consume more Vegetables & fruits 86.7<br />

To take IFA tablets for 100 days 86.7<br />

Others 46.7<br />

Reasons for not avail<strong>in</strong>g ANCs*<br />

Not aware <strong>of</strong> the need 3.3<br />

No faith -<br />

No ANC held <strong>in</strong> the village -<br />

TT Immunization receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Yes 100.0<br />

No -<br />

If yes, No. <strong>of</strong> doses<br />

One dose 6.7<br />

Two doses 93.3<br />

Not received -<br />

Reasons for not receiv<strong>in</strong>g TT<br />

Not aware <strong>of</strong> the need NA<br />

* Multiple responses ( Contd..)<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 6 (Contd…)<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> last pregnancy <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> < 6 months <strong>children</strong><br />

Particulars<br />

Received IFA tablets<br />

IFA tablets received from<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> IFA tablets received<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> IFA tablets consumed<br />

Percent<br />

n 30<br />

Yes 93.3<br />

No 6.7<br />

ANM 23.3<br />

AWW 53.3<br />

MO-PHC 6.7<br />

Private Doctor 10.0<br />

Not received 6.7<br />

30-60 3.3<br />

60-90 33.3<br />

≥90 56.7<br />

Not received 6.7<br />


Table –7<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> last Delivery <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong>


Table - 8<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> < 60 months <strong>children</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Birth order<br />

Birth order<br />

Percent<br />

n 508<br />

First 33.3<br />

Second 36.0<br />

Third 17.5<br />

Fourth 7.7<br />

Fifth and above 5.5<br />

Table - 9<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> < 60 months <strong>children</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g sibl<strong>in</strong>gs accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval between last two births<br />

Interval between last two births(months)<br />

Percent<br />

n 399<br />


Table - 10<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong>


Table - 11<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants ( 6 months - 33.9<br />

Not yet started 100.0 14.3<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> complementary food currently be<strong>in</strong>g given*<br />

* Multiple responses<br />

Cow/buffalo milk - 75.0<br />

Formula milk - 5.4<br />

Commercial baby foods - 14.3<br />

Home made Semi-solids - 83.9<br />

Home made solids - 85.7<br />

Not yet started 100.0 14.3<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table - 12<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 6-11 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Percent<br />

n 56<br />

Foods generally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> home made complementary foods*<br />

Cereals & Millets 85.7<br />

Pulses 85.7<br />

Green Leafy Vegetables 83.9<br />

Roots & Tubers 82.1<br />

Fruits 85.7<br />

Milk & milk products 76.8<br />

Eggs 28.6<br />

Meat & Chicken 10.7<br />

Fats & Oils 78.6<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> complementary feeds per day<br />

2 14.3<br />

3 44.6<br />

4 26.8<br />

5 -<br />

Not yet started 14.3<br />

Mode <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Mother with spoon -<br />

Mother with hand 85.7<br />

Self with spoon -<br />

Self by hand -<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g bottle -<br />

Not yet started 14.3<br />

Supervision <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

Mother 83.9<br />

Grand parents 1.8<br />

Not yet started 14.3<br />

* Multiple responses<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table - 13<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 12-35 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Percent<br />

n 215<br />

Children solely breast fed -<br />

Children currently Breast fed + complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g 66.5<br />

Weaned 33.5<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> food currently be<strong>in</strong>g given*<br />

Cow/buffalo milk 100.0<br />

Formula milk 0.9<br />

Commercial baby food 0.5<br />

Home made semi-solids 99.5<br />

Home made solids 99.5<br />

Not yet started -<br />

Foods generally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> home made foods*<br />

Cereals & Millets 100.0<br />

Pulses & legumes 100.0<br />

Green Leafy Vegetables 100.0<br />

Other Vegetables 99.5<br />

Roots & Tubers 99.1<br />

Fruits 99.5<br />

Milk & milk products 99.5<br />

Eggs 61.9<br />

Flesh foods 48.8<br />

Fats & Oils 96.7<br />

Not yet started CF -<br />

* Multiple responses ( Contd….)<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 13 (Contd…)<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 12-35 months Children<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Feed<strong>in</strong>g (CF) Practices<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> complementary feeds per day<br />

Mode <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g complementary food<br />

Supervision <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

Percent<br />

n 215<br />

≤2 4.7<br />

3 50.2<br />

≥4 45.1<br />

Not yet started CF -<br />

Mother with spoon 0.5<br />

Mother with hand 43.3<br />

Self with spoon 0.9<br />

Self by hand 55.3<br />

Not yet started CF -<br />

Mother 99.5<br />

Father -<br />

Elder Sibl<strong>in</strong>g -<br />

Grand parents 0.5<br />

Others -<br />

Not yet started CF -<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 14<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Care <strong>of</strong> the child and personal Hygiene<br />

Particulars<br />

Care <strong>of</strong> the child when mother goes out for work<br />

Age group (months)<br />


Table – 15<br />

Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> the Morbidity among 0- 59 months <strong>children</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

previous fortnight by age groups<br />

Age Group<br />

(months)<br />

n Fever Diarrhoea ARI<br />

At least one<br />

morbidity<br />

0-5 30 10.0 3.3 3.3 16.7<br />

6-11 56 25.0 12.5 5.4 35.7<br />

12-23 119 26.1 9.2 7.6 39.5<br />

24-35 96 22.9 4.2 8.3 30.2<br />

36-47 120 14.2 5.8 10.8 27.5<br />

48-59 87 20.7 9.2 8.0 32.2<br />

Pooled 508 20.7 7.5 8.1 31.9<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 16<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Care <strong>of</strong> the child dur<strong>in</strong>g Sickness<br />

Particulars<br />

Personnel generally consulted dur<strong>in</strong>g illness <strong>of</strong> the child<br />

Morbidity dur<strong>in</strong>g previous fortnight<br />

Age group (months)<br />


Table - 17<br />

Participation (%) <strong>in</strong> ICDS supplementation programme<br />

(6- 59 months <strong>children</strong>)<br />

Particulars<br />

Age group (months)<br />

6-35 36-59 6-59<br />

n 271 207 478<br />

Participat<strong>in</strong>g 85.2 97.6 90.6<br />

Regular 45.7 86.0 63.2<br />

Irregular 39.5 11.6 27.4<br />

Not participat<strong>in</strong>g 14.8 2.4 9.4<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table -18<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 12- 24 months <strong>children</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g to Coverage for<br />

Immunization <strong>under</strong> UIP<br />

Immunization Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 119<br />

Received all vacc<strong>in</strong>es ( Fully Immunized) 96.6<br />

Partially immunized 0.9<br />

Not immunized 2.5<br />

Reasons for no / <strong>in</strong>complete immunization<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

BCG 97.5<br />

DPT1 97.5<br />

DPT2 97.5<br />

DPT3 97.5<br />

OPV1 97.5<br />

OPV2 97.5<br />

OPV3 97.5<br />

Measles 96.6<br />

Unaware <strong>of</strong> need -<br />

Mother was busy 0.9<br />

Not <strong>of</strong>fered 2.5<br />

Fully immunized 96.6<br />

Mother & child protection card 36.9<br />

Immunization card 10.1<br />

AW record 20.2<br />

Parents 31.1<br />

Others 1.7<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table - 19<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 9- 59 months Children Accord<strong>in</strong>g to receipt <strong>of</strong> massive<br />

dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A dur<strong>in</strong>g previous one <strong>year</strong><br />

Age group (months)<br />

Particulars<br />

9-17 18-35 36-59 9-59<br />

Receipt <strong>of</strong> massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A<br />

No. doses vitam<strong>in</strong> A<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

n 82 174 207 463<br />

Yes 85.4 96.6 95.7 94.2<br />

No 9.8 3.4 4.3 4.9<br />

Do not remember 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.9<br />

One 85.4 35.6 22.7 38.6<br />

Two 0.0 61.0 73.0 55.6<br />

Not received 9.8 3.4 4.3 4.9<br />

Do not remember 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.9<br />

Home 2.5 0.6 0.0 0.7<br />

AWC 82.9 96.0 95.2 93.3<br />

Sub centre 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2<br />

PHC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Not received/do not remember 14.7 3.4 4.3 5.8<br />

Massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A adm<strong>in</strong>istered by<br />

AWW 31.7 36.2 31.9 33.5<br />

ANM 53.6 59.8 63.8 60.5<br />

Others 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2<br />

Not received/do not remember 14.7 3.4 4.3 5.8<br />

Reasons for not receiv<strong>in</strong>g/<strong>in</strong>complete massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A<br />

Unaware <strong>of</strong> need 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Not <strong>of</strong>fered 9.8 37.9 26.6 27.9<br />

Time/place not convenient 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Mother was busy 0.0 1.1 0.5 0.6<br />

Child below 18 months 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Do Not remember 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table - 20<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 12-59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to receipt <strong>of</strong> Iron & folic acid tablets<br />

Particulars<br />

Received IFA tablets<br />

IFA tablets received from<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> IFA tablets received<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> IFA tablets consumed<br />

Age group (months)<br />

12-35 36-59 12-59<br />

n 215 207 422<br />

Yes 1.9 5.3 3.6<br />

No 98.1 94.7 96.4<br />

ANM - 0.5 0.2<br />

AWW 1.9 4.8 3.3<br />

MO-PHC - - -<br />

Not received 98.1 94.7 96.5<br />


Table - 21<br />

Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> nutritional deficiency signs among 0 - 59 months<br />

<strong>children</strong><br />

Cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs<br />

Age groups (Months)<br />

0-11 12-35 36-59 0-59<br />

No <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ed 86 215 207 508<br />

NAD 100.0 99.5 97.1 98.6<br />

Emaciation - - - -<br />

Marasmus - - - -<br />

Bitot spots - - 1.0 0.4<br />

Dental caries - 0.5 - 0.2<br />

NAD: No Abnormality Detected<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


n<br />

Table -22<br />

Mean Height and weight <strong>of</strong> 0-59 months Children by age group and gender<br />

BOYS<br />

GIRLS<br />

Age<br />

Height (cm) Weight (kg) n Height (cm) Weight (kg)<br />

(Months)<br />

Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD<br />

3 47.5 3.98 3.0 0.76


Table - 23<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0-59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to nutritional status by<br />

SD Classification: By Age group<br />

Underweight (Weight for Age)<br />

Age<br />

Group<br />

(months)<br />

Age<br />

Group<br />

(months)<br />

n<br />

Severe<br />

(


Table -24<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to nutritional status by<br />

SD Classification*: By Gender<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong><br />

Gender<br />

n<br />


Table -25<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children by <strong>Nutritional</strong> status accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

SD Classification: By Socio-demographic variables<br />

Particulars<br />

n<br />

Weight for age Height for age Weight for height<br />


Table -25 (Contd...)<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children by <strong>Nutritional</strong> status accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

SD Classification: By Socio-demographic variables<br />

Particulars<br />

n<br />

Weight for age Height for age Weight for height<br />


Table – 25 (Contd…)<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children by <strong>Nutritional</strong> status accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

SD Classification: By Socio-demographic variables<br />

Weight for age Height for age Weight for height<br />

Particulars n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!