01.02.2015 Views

Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>under</strong>-<strong>five</strong> <strong>year</strong> <strong>rural</strong> <strong>children</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Madhya Pradesh State<br />

District: MORENA<br />

Morena<br />

Bh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

Sheopur<br />

Gwalior<br />

Datia<br />

Shivpuri<br />

Neemuch<br />

Mandsaur<br />

Ratlam Ujja<strong>in</strong><br />

Jhabua<br />

Indore<br />

Dhar<br />

Alirajpur<br />

Rajgarh<br />

Shajapur<br />

Dewas<br />

Sehore<br />

Guna<br />

Harda<br />

Bhopal<br />

Ashok<br />

Nagar<br />

Vidisha<br />

Raisen<br />

Hoshangabad<br />

Tikamgarh<br />

Sagar<br />

Narsimhapur<br />

Chh<strong>in</strong>dwara<br />

Chhatarpur<br />

Panna<br />

Damoh<br />

Seoni<br />

Jabalpur<br />

Katni<br />

Mandla<br />

Satna<br />

Umaria<br />

D<strong>in</strong>dori<br />

Rewa<br />

Shahdol<br />

Sidhi<br />

Anuppur<br />

S<strong>in</strong>grauli<br />

Barwani<br />

Khargone<br />

Khandwa<br />

Betul<br />

Balaghat<br />

Burhanpur<br />

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NUTRITION<br />

Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Medical Research<br />

Hyderabad – 500 007<br />

2011


<strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong><br />

Five <strong>year</strong> Rural <strong>children</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Madhya Pradesh State<br />

- Morena District<br />

G.N.V.Brahmam<br />

K.Venkaiah<br />

A.Laxmaiah<br />

I.I.Meshram<br />

K.Mallikharjuna Rao<br />

Ch.Gal Reddy<br />

Sharad Kumar<br />

M.Rav<strong>in</strong>dranath<br />

K.Sreerama Krishna<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition<br />

Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Medical Research<br />

Hyderabad – 500 007<br />

2011


CONTENTS<br />

Page No.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

PROJECT STAFF<br />

RESULTS AT GLANCE<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

i - iii<br />

1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 3<br />

1.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Morena District 3<br />

2. OBJECTIVES 3<br />

2.1 General Objective 3<br />

2.2 Specific objectives 4<br />

3. METHODOLOGY 4 - 6<br />

3.1 Sampl<strong>in</strong>g Design 4<br />

3.1.1 Sample size 4<br />

3.1.2 Selection <strong>of</strong> Villages 4<br />

3.1.3 Selection <strong>of</strong> Households 4<br />

3.2 Investigations 4<br />

3.2.1 Household socioeconomic and demographic Particulars 5<br />

3.2.2 Anthropometry 4<br />

3.2.3 Cl<strong>in</strong>ical exam<strong>in</strong>ation 5<br />

3.2.4 History <strong>of</strong> Morbidity 5<br />

3.2.5 Maternal Particulars 5<br />

3.2.6 Infant and Young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices 5<br />

3.2.7 Coverage <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> <strong>under</strong> various health & nutrition<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention Programmes 6<br />

3.2.8 Spot test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> household cook<strong>in</strong>g salt for Iod<strong>in</strong>e 6<br />

3.3 Recruitment, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, standardization <strong>of</strong> field Investigators and<br />

data collection<br />

3.4 Quality Control 6<br />

3.5 Data Analysis 6<br />

4. RESULTS 6 - 16<br />

4.1 Coverage 6<br />

4.2 Household Socio-economic and Demographic particulars 7<br />

4.2.1 Community 7<br />

4.2.2 Type <strong>of</strong> family 7<br />

4.2.3 Family size 7<br />

4.2.4 Literacy status <strong>of</strong> father 7<br />

4.2.5 Literacy status <strong>of</strong> mother 7<br />

6<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


4.2.6 Household landhold<strong>in</strong>g 7<br />

4.2.7 Major occupation <strong>of</strong> Father 7<br />

4.2.8 Major occupation <strong>of</strong> Mother 7<br />

4.2.9 Per capita monthly <strong>in</strong>come 8<br />

4.3 Household Physical facilities 8<br />

4.3.1 Type <strong>of</strong> house 8<br />

4.3.2 Household amenities 8<br />

4.4 Iod<strong>in</strong>e content <strong>of</strong> Cook<strong>in</strong>g salt 8<br />

4.5 Maternal characteristics 8<br />

4.5.1 Age and parity <strong>of</strong> mother 8<br />

4.5.2 Particulars <strong>of</strong> last Pregnancy (mothers <strong>of</strong>


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We express our s<strong>in</strong>cere thanks to Mr. B.R. Naidu, I.A.S, Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Secretary,<br />

and Smt. T<strong>in</strong>oo Joshi, I.A.S, and Dr. Loveleen Kacker, I.A.S, past Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<br />

Secretaries, Women and Child Development & Social Justice Department,<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh for provid<strong>in</strong>g us an opportunity to carry out this<br />

study.<br />

Our thanks are due to Ms. Kam<strong>in</strong>i Chauhan I.A.S, Deputy Secretary, Dr.<br />

Anupam Rajan, Director and Shri. Akshaya Srivatsav, Jo<strong>in</strong>t Director, Women and<br />

Child Development Department, Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh for their support<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the study.<br />

We are also thanksful to Shri. Gulshan Bamra, former Director, and Sri Praveen<br />

Kumar Gangrade, former Jt. Director, Women and Child Development Department,<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, and their colleagues for extend<strong>in</strong>g their cooperation and<br />

help <strong>in</strong> the execution <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>frastructural & logistic support extended by Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K. Trivedi,<br />

Executive Director, Mr. Gokul pal, Research Officer and their colleagues at Indian<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Development Management (IIDM), Bhopal is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

Our thanks are also due to UNICEF-Madhya Pradesh and UNICEF-New Delhi<br />

for their support by provid<strong>in</strong>g anthropometric equipment for use <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />

The help and support provided by the Districts Project Officers, Child<br />

Development Project Officers, Supervisors, Anganwadi Workers (AWWs) and<br />

ASHA worker (Health functionaries) <strong>of</strong> the concerned districts <strong>in</strong> the execution <strong>of</strong><br />

the survey, is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

Our s<strong>in</strong>cere thanks to the entire field staff for their commitment and<br />

s<strong>in</strong>cere efforts <strong>in</strong> the collection <strong>of</strong> data.<br />

We grateful to Dr. B. Sesikeran, Director, N.I.N and Dr. Vishwa Mohan<br />

Katoch, Director-general, I.C.M.R, and Secretary, Department <strong>of</strong> Health Research,<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health and Family Welfare, GoI, for their constant support and<br />

encouragement.<br />

We also thank Mr. G.Manohar Reddy, Research Officer, Mr. R. Raghunath<br />

Babu, Technical Assistant, Mrs. G.Madhavi, Technician, Ms. D.Sarala & G.Madhavi<br />

Tabulators, NNMB-CRL, and Ms. D. Balamani, Ms. D. Saritha & Ms. M. Venkata<br />

Ramanamma, Punch Operators, and Mrs. L. Rajeswari & Mr. M. Shashi Kumar Reddy,<br />

Data Entry Operators for their technical help.<br />

We are also thankful to Mr. G. Hanumantha Rao, and Mrs. G. Prashanthi,<br />

Personal Assistants for their secretarial assistance.<br />

Last but not least, we are extremely grateful to the community for their<br />

unst<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g cooperation, without which the study would not have been completed<br />

successfully.<br />

Authors


PROJECT STAFF<br />

RESEARCH ASSISTANTS<br />

Sl.No.<br />

Name<br />

2. Mr. PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SINGH<br />

4. Mr. AMOL KUMAR UKE<br />

FIELD INVESTIGATORS<br />

Sl.No.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

Name<br />

Mr. DILEEP PATEL<br />

Mr. NIKHIL SHARMA<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


RESULTS AT GLANCE


RESULTS AT A GLANCE<br />

DISTRICT PROFILE<br />

Total population (2001 Census) 15,87,264<br />

Sex Ratio 822<br />

Population density (per sq km) 318<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> Schedule caste 21.1<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> Schedule Tribes 8.0<br />

Literacy status (%) 65.6<br />

Female literacy (%) 46.8<br />

SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS<br />

HHs surveyed (n) 400<br />

Average Family size (n) 942<br />

Average per capita monthly <strong>in</strong>come (Rs) 6.6<br />

COMMUNITY (%)<br />

Scheduled Caste 18.5<br />

Scheduled Tribe 7.5<br />

TYPE OF FAMILY (%)<br />

Nuclear 44.7<br />

Extended Nuclear 21.3<br />

Jo<strong>in</strong>t 34.0<br />

LITERACY STATUS (%)<br />

Father 83.2<br />

Mother 55.4<br />

LAND HOLDING (% HHs)<br />

Land less Families 41.4<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>al Farmers 23.5<br />

Small Farmers 25.3<br />

Large Farmers 9.8<br />

.<br />

(Contd… 2)<br />

Nutr. Staust. <strong>of</strong> < 5 <strong>year</strong> Children<br />

Morena Dt.- Madhya Pradesh


RESULTS AT A GLANCE (Contd…2)<br />

MAJOR OCCUPATION OF HOUSEHOLD<br />

Percent<br />

Labourers 32.3<br />

Cultivators 41.6<br />

Land Lords -<br />

Artisans 4.3<br />

Service 13.5<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess 7.3<br />

TYPE OF HOUSE<br />

Kutcha 21.3<br />

Semi-Pucca 55.4<br />

Pucca 23.3<br />

SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER<br />

Open well 4.0<br />

Tube well 96.0<br />

Tap -<br />

HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICITY 18.0<br />

PRESENT AND USING SANITARY LATRINE 15.8<br />

IODINE CONTENT OF COOKING SALT<br />

0 ppm 45.2<br />


Delivery conducted by<br />

RESULTS AT A GLANCE (Contd…3)<br />

PARTICULARS<br />

Percent<br />

M.O. PHC 65.3<br />

ANM/LHV 28.7<br />

Pvt. Doctor 5.0<br />

Untra<strong>in</strong>ed Dai/Others 1.0<br />

Low birth weight (% <strong>in</strong>fants) 10.0<br />

BREAST FEEDING AND COMPLEMENTARY FEEDING<br />

Initiate <strong>of</strong> Breast feed<strong>in</strong>g (hours)<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> complementary Feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Immunization ( 12-24 months <strong>children</strong>)<br />


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Executive Summary<br />

Undernutrition cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be a major public health problem <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g India, the most vulnerable groups be<strong>in</strong>g women and young<br />

<strong>children</strong>. Proper nutrition is necessary for adequate growth and development <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>children</strong>. Undernutrition is <strong>of</strong> multi-factorial aetiology, which <strong>in</strong>clude both food and<br />

non-food factors.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the recent reports <strong>of</strong> NFHS-3 (2005-06), the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>under</strong>weight among <strong>under</strong> <strong>five</strong> <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> <strong>in</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh was 60%,<br />

stunt<strong>in</strong>g was 50% and wast<strong>in</strong>g was 35%, while accord<strong>in</strong>g to NNMB surveys carried out<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the same period (2005-06), the prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>weight and wast<strong>in</strong>g was lower<br />

(46% and 24% respectively) and that <strong>of</strong> stunt<strong>in</strong>g was more (59%). The prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>under</strong>nutrition especially among <strong>under</strong> <strong>five</strong> <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> may vary geographically.<br />

Therefore, for the development <strong>of</strong> area specific <strong>in</strong>tervention strategies, assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

district level prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition is very essential. At the request <strong>of</strong> DWCD,<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition, Hyderabad<br />

therefore carried out the present study to estimate the prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition<br />

among <strong>under</strong> <strong>five</strong> <strong>year</strong> <strong>rural</strong> <strong>children</strong> and <strong>in</strong>fant and young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices. It<br />

was a cross sectional study carried out us<strong>in</strong>g multi-stage random sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

procedure. A total <strong>of</strong> 400 HHs from 20 randomly selected villages, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 410<br />

<strong>children</strong> were covered for the present study.<br />

A majority <strong>of</strong> the HHs covered <strong>in</strong> the present survey belonged to backward<br />

communities (42.5%) followed by others (31.5%) and Scheduled Caste (18.5%).<br />

About 45% <strong>of</strong> the HHs were nuclear families. About 45% <strong>of</strong> the mothers were<br />

illiterate, two fifth <strong>of</strong> the HHs (41%) did not possess any agricultural land and about<br />

one third (32%) were engaged <strong>in</strong> either agricultural or other labours. Majority (80%)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the women were housewives. About a half <strong>of</strong> HHs (55%) lived <strong>in</strong> semi pucca<br />

houses and 21% <strong>in</strong> kutcha. Majority (96%) <strong>of</strong> the HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g bore well water.<br />

Only 16% were us<strong>in</strong>g sanitary latr<strong>in</strong>e. Majority (97%) <strong>of</strong> HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g firewood for<br />

cook<strong>in</strong>g purpose and only 18% HHs had electricity. Only about 15% <strong>of</strong> HHs were<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g adequately iodized salt (≥15 ppm).<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


About two thirds (69%) <strong>of</strong> pregnant women had <strong>under</strong>gone Antenatal check-up<br />

(ANC) <strong>of</strong> which about 19% had ≥3 ANCs. Half (50%) <strong>of</strong> the pregnant women were<br />

registered for ANC before 16 weeks <strong>of</strong> gestation. About 81% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women<br />

received IFA tablets dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy, 27% received more than 90 tablets and all <strong>of</strong><br />

them reportedly consumed ≥90 tablets. About 99% deliveries were <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

deliveries, either <strong>in</strong> government or private hospitals. Majority (70%) <strong>of</strong> deliveries were<br />

conducted by a medical doctor. Birth weights were reportedly recorded <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> 69%<br />

<strong>in</strong>fants, and records were available for all <strong>in</strong>fants measured. The overall prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

low birth weight was 10%.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the mothers (99%) fed colostrum to their newborns. About half<br />

(53.5%) <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>in</strong>itiated breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> 1hour and 45% did so with<strong>in</strong> 1-3<br />

hours <strong>of</strong> delivery. None <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fants were given pre-lacteal feeds such as<br />

glucose/sugar water, honey, etc.<br />

Among 6-11 months <strong>children</strong>, complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong>itiated at 6<br />

months <strong>of</strong> age <strong>in</strong> about 13%, while 33% <strong>children</strong> received the same dur<strong>in</strong>g 7-11<br />

months <strong>of</strong> age. About 43% <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> did not receive complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Of the 6-11 months <strong>in</strong>fants, about 53% each were receiv<strong>in</strong>g cow/buffalo milk<br />

and 44% home made semisolids/solids, about 44% were receiv<strong>in</strong>g such foods at<br />

least 3 times a day. Among 12-35 months <strong>children</strong>, about two thirds (69%) received<br />

complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> addition to breast milk. Majority were receiv<strong>in</strong>g home<br />

made solids and cow/buffalo milk and 72% were receiv<strong>in</strong>g such foods at least 3<br />

times a day.<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> (92%) were completely immunized, while about 6% did not<br />

receive any immunization. About 97% <strong>of</strong> 9-59 months <strong>children</strong> received at least one<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> Vitam<strong>in</strong> A dur<strong>in</strong>g the preced<strong>in</strong>g <strong>year</strong>. About 98% <strong>of</strong> 18-59 months <strong>children</strong><br />

received the stipulated two doses.<br />

About 9% <strong>of</strong> 12-59 months <strong>children</strong> received ≥90 IFA tablets, while none <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>children</strong> consumed ≥90 tablets.<br />

None <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fants exhibited the cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs <strong>of</strong> nutritional deficiency, while<br />

0.3% <strong>of</strong> 12-59 months <strong>children</strong> exhibited the signs <strong>of</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A deficiency (Bitot spot).<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


About 21% <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> reportedly had one or more morbidities such as fever,<br />

ARI and diarrhoea dur<strong>in</strong>g the preced<strong>in</strong>g fortnight. The prevalence was relatively<br />

higher among 6-11 months <strong>children</strong>, which tended to decrease with <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> age.<br />

About 77% <strong>of</strong> the mothers reported that they generally consult private practitioner,<br />

while 23% went to PHC, to seek treatment for their sick <strong>children</strong>.<br />

The overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition (


1. INTRODUCTION<br />

India, <strong>in</strong> the past few decades, has witnessed rapid progress <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrialization and agricultural production. Yet malnutrition, especially <strong>under</strong>nutrition<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be a major problem <strong>of</strong> public health significance <strong>in</strong> the country. It is a major<br />

contributor to high rates <strong>of</strong> childhood mortality, maternal mortality and morbidities <strong>in</strong> the<br />

community 1 . Though, poverty is a major <strong>under</strong>ly<strong>in</strong>g cause, scores <strong>of</strong> other factors such<br />

as socio-demographic, socio-cultural and lifestyle practices contribute significantly to the<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> malnutrition.<br />

Prevalence <strong>of</strong> low birth weight, ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e growth retardation<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be high, which is attributable to maternal <strong>under</strong>nutrition. This is further<br />

aggravated by <strong>in</strong>appropriate <strong>in</strong>fant and young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices, such as discard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> colostrum, delayed <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> breast feed<strong>in</strong>g, early or delayed <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong><br />

complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g, and sub-optimal complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

type <strong>of</strong> feed, quantity, and frequency.<br />

It has been found that non-exclusive breast feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the first six months <strong>of</strong> life<br />

results <strong>in</strong> 1.4 million deaths and 10% <strong>of</strong> the disease burden among <strong>in</strong>fants and young<br />

<strong>children</strong> every <strong>year</strong> <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries 2 . It is also estimated that about 10-15% <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>under</strong> <strong>five</strong> <strong>year</strong> deaths <strong>in</strong> resource poor countries could be prevented by achiev<strong>in</strong>g 90%<br />

<strong>of</strong> exclusive breast feed<strong>in</strong>g alone 3 and 22% <strong>of</strong> neonatal deaths could be prevented if<br />

breast feed<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>itiated with<strong>in</strong> the first hour <strong>of</strong> birth 4 .<br />

About 21% <strong>of</strong> global deaths and DALYs (Disability Adjusted Life Years) <strong>in</strong> <strong>children</strong><br />

younger than 5 <strong>year</strong>s are attributed to stunt<strong>in</strong>g, severe wast<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e growth<br />

retardation. Long term consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition dur<strong>in</strong>g the early stages <strong>of</strong> child<br />

growth and development <strong>in</strong>clude likelihood <strong>of</strong> short stature <strong>in</strong> adult life, low educational<br />

achievements, giv<strong>in</strong>g birth to smaller <strong>children</strong>, lower economic status and reduced<br />

physical work capacity and productivity <strong>in</strong> adulthood 5 .<br />

Further, the country is pass<strong>in</strong>g through a phase <strong>of</strong> rapid socio-economic transition<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g to over nutrition <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> segments <strong>of</strong> the population, especially <strong>in</strong> the urban<br />

communities. Chang<strong>in</strong>g lifestyles and dietary habits are contribut<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> overweight/obesity among <strong>children</strong> and young adults expos<strong>in</strong>g them to the<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> chronic degenerative disorders such as hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, coronary<br />

artery disease, stroke, cancers etc <strong>in</strong> the later part <strong>of</strong> life. More over <strong>under</strong>nutrition dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

early childhood can lead to overweight/obesity <strong>in</strong> adulthood, a risk factor for diet related<br />

chronic diseases 6 .<br />

The major nutritional problems <strong>of</strong> public health significance <strong>in</strong> the country are,<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> energy malnutrition (PEM), vitam<strong>in</strong> A deficiency (VAD), iron deficiency anaemia<br />

(IDA), and iod<strong>in</strong>e deficiency disorders (IDD). Preschool <strong>children</strong>, adolescent girls, women<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


<strong>of</strong> reproductive age group, elderly, those belong<strong>in</strong>g to socio-economically backward<br />

groups such as scheduled caste and schedule tribe communities, communities resid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> chronically drought affected <strong>rural</strong> areas are nutritionally the most vulnerable segments<br />

<strong>of</strong> the populations.<br />

Several nutrition programmes have been designed and are be<strong>in</strong>g implemented <strong>in</strong><br />

India, through respective State Governments, dur<strong>in</strong>g the past few decades for the<br />

prevention and control <strong>of</strong> both macro and micronutrient malnutrition <strong>in</strong> the population.<br />

They <strong>in</strong>clude supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g through ICDS, distribution <strong>of</strong> iron and folic acid<br />

tablets, massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A supplementation, Mid-day meal programme etc. Also,<br />

several poverty alleviation and developmental programmes are be<strong>in</strong>g implemented by<br />

central and State governments, for the overall socioeconomic development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

communities. In addition, Public Distribution System and TPDS are striv<strong>in</strong>g to provide<br />

essential commodities at affordable price, especially to those below poverty l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

throughout the <strong>year</strong>, all over the country, to ensure household food security.<br />

Children, who are subjected to socio-economic and dietary constra<strong>in</strong>ts dur<strong>in</strong>g their<br />

critical <strong>year</strong>s <strong>of</strong> growth and development, end up as adults with small body size. Such<br />

adults may be apparently healthy, but there is evidence to suggest that their productivity<br />

and earn<strong>in</strong>g capacity are impaired (Satyanarayana and Naidu, 1977 7 ). Repeat surveys by<br />

National Nutrition Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Bureau (1999 8 ) <strong>in</strong> eight States revealed that, despite very<br />

little or no change <strong>in</strong> the dietary <strong>in</strong>takes <strong>of</strong> <strong>rural</strong> population over a period <strong>of</strong> time, there was<br />

a decrease <strong>in</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> severe forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition among young <strong>children</strong> with<br />

concomitant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> normal grades. However, the proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> with mild to<br />

moderate <strong>under</strong>nutrition rema<strong>in</strong>ed similar. Recent survey carried out by NNMB (2006 9 ) <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>rural</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e States revealed that about 40% <strong>under</strong> 5 <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> were<br />

<strong>under</strong>weight, 45% were stunted and 20% were wasted. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g figures for the<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh were, 46%, 59% and 24% respectively.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to NFHS-3 10 , <strong>in</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, 60% <strong>of</strong>


and nutrition status <strong>of</strong> the community, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be<br />

significantly high.<br />

The type and magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition may vary from district to district,<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g on geographical and agro-climatic conditions and therefore, warrant regionspecific<br />

<strong>in</strong>terventions. In order to devise and implement area specific <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

strategies and to monitor their impact over a period, it is necessary to generate data<br />

base at district level.<br />

In this context, the Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh is contemplat<strong>in</strong>g to develop<br />

State Nutrition Policy and develop plan <strong>of</strong> action for implementation, <strong>in</strong> order to improve<br />

the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the communities. Therefore, at the request <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Women & Child Development, Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, the National Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Nutrition carried out survey <strong>in</strong> all the follow<strong>in</strong>g 50 districts <strong>of</strong> the State, to assess the<br />

nutritional status <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong> 5 <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> and <strong>in</strong>fant and young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices.<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

District<br />

Sl.<br />

N<br />

o<br />

District<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

District<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

District<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

District<br />

1 Alirajpur 11 Ch<strong>in</strong>dwara 21 Indore 31 Neemuch 41 Shadol<br />

2 Anuppur 12 Damoh 22 Jabalpur 32 Panna 42 Shajapur<br />

3 Ashokngar 13 Datia 23 Jhabua 33 Raisen 43 Sheopur<br />

4 Balaghat 14 Dewas 24 Katni 34 Rajgarh 44 Sidhi<br />

5 Barwani 15 Dhar 25 Khandwa 35 Ratlam 45 S<strong>in</strong>grauli<br />

6 Betul 16 D<strong>in</strong>dori 26 Khargone 36 Rewa 46 Shivpuri<br />

7 Bh<strong>in</strong>d 17 Guna 27 Mandla 37 Sagar 47 Tikamgarh<br />

8 Bhopal 18 Gwalior 28 Mandsaur 38 Sathna 48 Ujja<strong>in</strong><br />

9 Burhanpur 19 Harda 29 Morena 39 Sehore 49 Umaria<br />

10 Chhatarpur 20 Hoshangabad 30 Narasimhapur 40 Seoni 50 Vidisha<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the study carried out <strong>in</strong> Morena district <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh State<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g February-August 2010, is presented <strong>in</strong> this report.<br />

1.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Morena District<br />

The Morena district is surrounded by Dholpur district <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan <strong>in</strong> north-west,<br />

P<strong>in</strong>ahat district (Uttar Pradesh) <strong>in</strong> north-east, Bh<strong>in</strong>d district <strong>in</strong> the east and Sheopur and<br />

Gwalior <strong>in</strong> the south. The total population <strong>of</strong> the district is 15,87,264 (2001 census), with<br />

a population density <strong>of</strong> 318/sq.km. About 78% <strong>of</strong> the population was <strong>rural</strong> and 22% was<br />

urban. The proportion <strong>of</strong> Scheduled Caste population was 21.1%, while that <strong>of</strong><br />

Scheduled Tribe was 8%. The district has a sex ratio <strong>of</strong> 822. The overall literacy rate is<br />

65.6% with 81% for males and 46.8% for females.<br />

2. OBJECTIVES<br />

2.1 General Objective<br />

The general objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to assess the health and nutritional status<br />

<strong>of</strong>


2.2 Specific objectives<br />

The specific objectives <strong>of</strong> the study were,<br />

1. To assess the nutritional status <strong>of</strong>


3.2.1 Household demographic and socioeconomic particulars<br />

Information on household demographic and socio-economic particulars were<br />

collected <strong>in</strong> all the 20 households selected for survey, us<strong>in</strong>g a pre-coded and pre tested<br />

questionnaire.<br />

3.2.2 Anthropometry<br />

Height (up to nearest 1mm) and weight (up to nearest 100g) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were<br />

measured us<strong>in</strong>g standard anthropometric equipment and procedures 13 . The nutritional<br />

status <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> was assessed accord<strong>in</strong>g to SD classification 14 us<strong>in</strong>g WHO growth<br />

standards (2006) 15 .<br />

Standard Deviation Classification<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> status <strong>of</strong> preschool <strong>children</strong> was assessed accord<strong>in</strong>g to weight for age,<br />

height for age and weight for height, by Standard Deviation classification recommended<br />

by WHO, as given below:<br />

Cut-<strong>of</strong>f level<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> grade<br />

Weight for Age Height for Age Weight for Height<br />

≥ Median –2SD Normal Normal Normal<br />

< Median –2SD to


3.2.7 Coverage <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> <strong>under</strong> various health & nutrition <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

Programmes.<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> coverage <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> for all the immunizations such as BCG, DPT,<br />

Polio and measles dur<strong>in</strong>g first <strong>year</strong> <strong>of</strong> life was collected for <strong>children</strong> aged 12-24 months.<br />

In addition, the coverage <strong>of</strong> 9-59 months <strong>children</strong> for supplementation <strong>of</strong> massive dose<br />

vitam<strong>in</strong> A was collected. The coverage <strong>of</strong> 1-5 <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> for distribution <strong>of</strong> Iron & Folic<br />

acid (IFA) tablets/syrup was also collected. Information on participation <strong>of</strong> 6-59 months<br />

<strong>children</strong> <strong>in</strong> the ICDS supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g programme was also collected.<br />

3.2.8 Spot test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> household cook<strong>in</strong>g salt for Iod<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Cook<strong>in</strong>g salt samples collected from the households were tested for iod<strong>in</strong>e<br />

content by us<strong>in</strong>g spot test<strong>in</strong>g kits, supplied by UNICEF, Madhya Pradesh.<br />

3.3 Recruitment, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, standardization <strong>of</strong> field Investigators and data collection<br />

Ten teams, each consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> two post graduate Research Assistants<br />

(Nutritionist/Anthropologist/Social worker) and one graduate Field Investigator hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iciency <strong>in</strong> local language were recruited, tra<strong>in</strong>ed and standardized <strong>in</strong> various survey<br />

methodologies, by the scientists from the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition. All the survey<br />

<strong>in</strong>struments (pr<strong>of</strong>ormae) were developed, translated <strong>in</strong>to h<strong>in</strong>di vernacular and pre-tested<br />

before be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong> the survey. Data was collected <strong>in</strong> each district by two teams.<br />

3.4 Quality Control<br />

Random checks were carried out by scientists from NIN, periodically by revisit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the households surveyed by the field staff, to ensure quality <strong>of</strong> data collection.<br />

3.5 Data Analysis<br />

The data was scrut<strong>in</strong>ized and entered <strong>in</strong>to the computers as soon as it was<br />

received at NIN. The data clean<strong>in</strong>g was done by carry<strong>in</strong>g out range and consistency<br />

checks. Descriptive and analytical statistics <strong>of</strong> the data were carried out us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS<br />

W<strong>in</strong>dows version 15.0. Appropriate statistical tools were used wherever needed.<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

4.1 Coverage<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 400 households from 20 villages were covered for the study (Table 1). A<br />

total <strong>of</strong> 410 <strong>children</strong> (Boys:240; Girls:170)


addition, cook<strong>in</strong>g salt samples from all the households surveyed were tested for iod<strong>in</strong>e<br />

content, by us<strong>in</strong>g spot test<strong>in</strong>g kits.<br />

4.2 Household Socio-economic and Demographic particulars<br />

The demographic and socio-economic particulars <strong>of</strong> the households (HHs)<br />

covered for the survey is provided <strong>in</strong> Table 2.<br />

4.2.1 Community<br />

About 43% <strong>of</strong> households covered for the survey belonged to backward<br />

communities, while 32% belonged to other communities. Scheduled Caste and<br />

Scheduled Tribe communities accounted for 19% and 8% respectively.<br />

4.2.2 Type <strong>of</strong> family<br />

About 45% <strong>of</strong> the HHS were nuclear families and 34% were jo<strong>in</strong>t, while the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 21% were extended nuclear families.<br />

4.2.3 Family size<br />

The average family size was 6.6. About 27% <strong>of</strong> the HHs had family size <strong>of</strong> ≤ 4<br />

members, 56% <strong>of</strong> HHs had 5-9 and 17% <strong>of</strong> HHs had ≥10 members.<br />

4.2.4 Literacy status <strong>of</strong> father<br />

About 83% <strong>of</strong> the fathers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>children</strong> were literates. About 14% had an<br />

education level <strong>of</strong> 1-5 th class, about 40% had school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 6 th -10 th class, 18% were<br />

studied up to <strong>in</strong>termediate and 12% had graduation or above .<br />

4.2.5 Literacy status <strong>of</strong> mother<br />

About 55% <strong>of</strong> the mothers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>children</strong> were literates. About 21% <strong>of</strong> them<br />

had an education level <strong>of</strong> 1-5 th class, 23% were educated up to 6 th -10 th class, while about<br />

12% had education level <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediate or above.<br />

4.2.6 Household landhold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

About 41% <strong>of</strong> households did not posses any agricultural land, about 25% were<br />

small farmers (2.5 - 5 acres), 24% were marg<strong>in</strong>al farmers (


4.2.9 Per capita monthly <strong>in</strong>come<br />

The average monthly per capita <strong>in</strong>come (PCI) <strong>of</strong> HHs was Rs 942. About 8% <strong>of</strong><br />

the HHs had average PCI <strong>of</strong> < Rs. 300, 31% had Rs.300-600 and 26% had Rs. 600-900,<br />

while about 36% had monthly PCI <strong>of</strong> ≥ Rs.900.<br />

4.3 Household Physical facilities<br />

4.3.1 Type <strong>of</strong> house<br />

About 55% percent <strong>of</strong> the houses were semi-pucca <strong>in</strong> nature, 21% were kutcha<br />

and 23% were pucca (Table 3).<br />

4.3.2 Household amenities<br />

The major source <strong>of</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water was from tube well (96%), followed by open<br />

well (4%). Only about 3% <strong>of</strong> the HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g LPG or bio-gas for cook<strong>in</strong>g purposes,<br />

while 97% <strong>of</strong> HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g firewood. About 18% <strong>of</strong> the houses were electrified. About<br />

16% <strong>of</strong> the HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g sanitary latr<strong>in</strong>e. About 36% <strong>of</strong> HHs had provision <strong>of</strong> separate<br />

kitchen.<br />

4.4 Iod<strong>in</strong>e content <strong>of</strong> Cook<strong>in</strong>g salt<br />

The distribution <strong>of</strong> HHs accord<strong>in</strong>g to iod<strong>in</strong>e content <strong>of</strong> cook<strong>in</strong>g salt as estimated by<br />

spot test<strong>in</strong>g kit is presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4. It was observed that about half <strong>of</strong> the HHs<br />

(46.2%) were us<strong>in</strong>g powdered salt, while only 18% were us<strong>in</strong>g free flow<strong>in</strong>g salt. Only<br />

15% <strong>of</strong> HHs were us<strong>in</strong>g adequately iodized (≥15 ppm) salt, 40% samples had


consume more green leafy vegetables and fruits, attend ANCs regularly and consume IFA<br />

tablets dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy.<br />

About 81% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women received IFA tablets. While about 27% received and<br />

consumed ≥90 tablets dur<strong>in</strong>g the pregnancy. The IFA tablets were received mostly from<br />

AWW (57.8%). Nearly 89% <strong>of</strong> the mothers reportedly received two doses <strong>of</strong> TT<br />

immunization.<br />

4.5.3 Particulars <strong>of</strong> last Delivery (Mothers hav<strong>in</strong>g


%<br />

Fig.1 Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0-11 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> Initiation <strong>of</strong> Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g (BF)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

53.5<br />

45.5<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />


<strong>in</strong>cluded cow/buffalo milk (53.3%), followed by home made solids (44%) and home made<br />

semi-solids (26.7%) (Table 11).<br />

The foods generally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the complementary feeds were milk & milk products<br />

and cereals & millets (49.3% each), pulses (36%), fruits (22.7%), and GLV (9.3%). About<br />

44% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> received 3-4 complementary feeds per day, while the rest (13%)<br />

received 2 feeds a day. About 37% <strong>of</strong> mothers fed the <strong>in</strong>fants with their hand, while 13%<br />

gave complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g with spoon. In about 7% <strong>of</strong> cases, the <strong>in</strong>fants fed by<br />

themselves. The feed<strong>in</strong>g was supervised mostly by the mother (57.3%) (Table 12).<br />

4.6.2.2 12-35 month <strong>children</strong><br />

About 69% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were currently receiv<strong>in</strong>g complementary foods <strong>in</strong> addition to<br />

breast milk and 31% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were completely weaned. The type <strong>of</strong> food be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

currently given <strong>in</strong>cluded cow/buffalo milk (98.8%), home made solids (98.3%), and home<br />

made semi-solids (46.2%). The most commonly used food groups <strong>in</strong>cluded cereals &<br />

millets (100%), pulses and GLV (99.4% each), other vegetables, roots & tubers and<br />

Milk & milk products (97.7% each), fats & oils (95.4%) followed by fruits (86.7%), eggs<br />

(13.9%) and flesh foods (7.5%). About 32% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were fed ≥ 4 times a day,<br />

39% were fed 3 times a day, while 28% were fed ≤ 2 times a day. About 51% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>children</strong> consumed food themselves mostly with hands. About 49% <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> were fed<br />

by their mothers. In most cases, feed<strong>in</strong>g was supervised by their mothers (99.4%) (Table<br />

13).<br />

4.6.3 Care <strong>of</strong> the Child<br />

About 80% <strong>of</strong> mothers reportedly were tak<strong>in</strong>g care <strong>of</strong> their <strong>children</strong> by themselves at<br />

home, while 7% stated that they were cared by either the grand parents (4.9%) or by the older<br />

sibl<strong>in</strong>gs (1.5%) (Table 14). About 9% <strong>of</strong> the mothers carried their <strong>children</strong> to the work-spot.<br />

4.6.4 Personal Hygiene<br />

About 37% <strong>of</strong> mothers washed their hands with soap before feed<strong>in</strong>g the child.<br />

About 80% were us<strong>in</strong>g soap for wash<strong>in</strong>g their hands after defecation (Table 14).<br />

4.6.5 History <strong>of</strong> Morbidity<br />

The particulars <strong>of</strong> morbidity dur<strong>in</strong>g preced<strong>in</strong>g fortnight among


espectively), and tended to decrease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g age to 2% and 7% respectively <strong>in</strong><br />

the age group <strong>of</strong> 48-59 months.<br />

A majority <strong>of</strong> the mothers <strong>in</strong> general stated that, they consult a private practitioner<br />

(77.1%), or visit the PHC (22.7%), when the <strong>children</strong> fall sick, (Table 16). About 11% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>children</strong> reportedly had diarrhoea dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous fortnight, while about 8% received<br />

ORS, either home made (7.8%) or that given by ANM/AWW (7.3%) or commercial one<br />

(1%). A relatively higher proportion (9.2%) <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> (12-35 months) were given ORS,<br />

compared to 0-11 months <strong>children</strong> (6.9%). About 3% reportedly had acute respiratory<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection, while none had received co-trimoxazole.<br />

4.6.6 Participation <strong>in</strong> ICDS Supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g Programme.<br />

About 74% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong> 6-59 months age group were participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the ICDS<br />

supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g programme, with 41% be<strong>in</strong>g regular. The extent <strong>of</strong> participation<br />

was observed to be high (97%) among 36-59 months as compared to 61% among 6-35<br />

months age group (Table 17). A higher proportion <strong>of</strong> older <strong>children</strong> (36-59 months) were<br />

regular (72.8%), than younger counterparts (23%).<br />

4.6.7 Coverage for Immunization <strong>under</strong> UIP<br />

The particulars <strong>of</strong> coverage <strong>of</strong> 12-24 months <strong>children</strong> for immunization <strong>under</strong><br />

Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) dur<strong>in</strong>g the first <strong>year</strong> <strong>of</strong> life are provided <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

18 and Fig. 3. About 92% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>children</strong> were fully immunized, 6% were partially<br />

immunized, while about 1% did not receive any immunization. About 97-99% received<br />

polio, DPT & BCG vacc<strong>in</strong>es, while only 97% received measles vacc<strong>in</strong>ation. Major source<br />

<strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong>formation was from mother and child protection card (38.5%), followed by AWC<br />

records (25.6%), parents (23%) and immunization card (6.4%). The major reason for not<br />

immunized or partially immunized was ‘not <strong>of</strong>fered’ (7.7%).<br />

4.6.8 Coverage for Massive dose <strong>of</strong> Vitam<strong>in</strong> A Supplementation<br />

The National programme on Prevention and control <strong>of</strong> bl<strong>in</strong>dness due to Vitam<strong>in</strong> A<br />

deficiency envisages that all the <strong>children</strong> between 9 to 60 months should receive<br />

biannual massive dose <strong>of</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A. The particulars <strong>of</strong> coverage <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> for massive<br />

dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous one <strong>year</strong> are provided <strong>in</strong> Table 19. In general, about<br />

97% <strong>of</strong> 9-59 months <strong>children</strong> reportedly received at least one dose <strong>of</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A. While<br />

the coverage was 98% among 18-59 months <strong>children</strong>, and 91% <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong> 9-17 months<br />

received massive dose <strong>of</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A. About 98% <strong>of</strong> 18-59 months <strong>children</strong> received 2<br />

doses dur<strong>in</strong>g preced<strong>in</strong>g one <strong>year</strong>. In a majority <strong>of</strong> cases, the massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A was<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istered at AWC (95.8%), mostly by ANM (50.4%) or AWW (46.2%). The major<br />

reasons for non-receipt <strong>of</strong> massive dose <strong>of</strong> Vitam<strong>in</strong> A were time/place not convenient<br />

(1.7%) or ‘not <strong>of</strong>fered’ (0.9%).<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


%<br />

100<br />

90<br />

98.6<br />

Fig. 3 Coverage (%) <strong>of</strong> 12-24 months Children for Immunization <strong>under</strong><br />

Universal Immunization Program (UIP)<br />

98.6 98.6 98.6 97.3 97.3 97.3 97.3<br />

80<br />

92.3<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

6.3<br />

1.4<br />

0<br />

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 OPV1 OPV2 OPV3 Measles Full Imm. Partial<br />

Imm.<br />

No Imm.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


4.6.9 Coverage for Iron and Folic acid tablets Supplementation<br />

About 35% <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong> 12-59 months reportedly received IFA tablets dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

preced<strong>in</strong>g <strong>year</strong>, either from AWW (34.7%) or ANM (0.6%). Only about 9% received ≥ 90<br />

IFA tablets, while none <strong>of</strong> them consumed ≥ 90 tablets (Table 20).<br />

4.7 <strong>Nutritional</strong> status <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> (


20<br />

16<br />

Fig.4 Distance charts for Weights - Boys<br />

Median Wt - WHO Standards<br />

Mean Wt - Current Study<br />

Wt (Kgs)<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12-17<br />

18-23<br />

24-29<br />

30-35<br />

36-41<br />

42-47<br />

48-53<br />

54-59<br />

Age (Months)<br />

20<br />

16<br />

Fig.5 Distance charts for Weights - Girls<br />

Median Wt - WHO Standards<br />

Mean Wt - Current Study<br />

Wt (Kgs)<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

Age (Months)<br />

12-17<br />

18-23<br />

24-29<br />

30-35<br />

36-41<br />

42-47<br />

48-53<br />

54-59<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


120<br />

100<br />

Fig.6 Distance charts for Heights - Boys<br />

Meadian Ht-WHO standards<br />

Mean Ht -Current Study<br />

80<br />

Ht (Cms)<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12-17<br />

18-23<br />

24-29<br />

30-35<br />

36-41<br />

42-47<br />

48-53<br />

54-59<br />

Age (Months)<br />

120<br />

100<br />

Fig.7 Distance charts for Heights - Girls<br />

Meadian Ht-WHO standards<br />

Mean Ht -Current Study<br />

80<br />

Ht (Cms)<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

Age (Months)<br />

12-17<br />

18-23<br />

24-29<br />

30-35<br />

36-41<br />

42-47<br />

48-53<br />

54-59<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Fig.8 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


The overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> stunt<strong>in</strong>g among


Fig.10 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


16% respectively), compared to those with family size <strong>of</strong> ≥10 members (9%). However,<br />

none <strong>of</strong> the differences were statistically significant.<br />

Literacy status <strong>of</strong> father<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>weight (p


Fig.11 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


Fig.13 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


prevalence <strong>of</strong> stunt<strong>in</strong>g tended to <strong>in</strong>crease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come from about 60% among<br />

those with PCI <strong>of</strong>


Fig.15 Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> Undernutrition among


HHs us<strong>in</strong>g sanitary latr<strong>in</strong>es (12%) compared to those not us<strong>in</strong>g or not hav<strong>in</strong>g sanitary<br />

latr<strong>in</strong>es (16%).<br />

Separate Kitchen<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>weight, and stunt<strong>in</strong>g was significantly (p


American Academy <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics (1997) 18<br />

superior for <strong>in</strong>fant feed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

stated that the mother’s milk is uniquely<br />

Epidemiological research showed that mother’s milk and breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants<br />

provides advantages with regard to general health, growth and development while<br />

significantly decreas<strong>in</strong>g risk for a large number <strong>of</strong> acute and chronic diseases. In this<br />

study, breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g was the common practice among the mothers. However, about 54%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mothers reportedly <strong>in</strong>itiated breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> one hour after delivery which is<br />

higher than that reported by the NFHS-3 for the State (16%), while 46% <strong>of</strong> the mothers<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiated breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> 1-3 hours. None <strong>of</strong> the new born received Pre-lacteals. This<br />

is very encourag<strong>in</strong>g observation and needs sustenance as pre-lacteal may be harmful for<br />

the immature gut. Early <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> breast feed<strong>in</strong>g is the primary determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

milk production and secretion. Avoidance <strong>of</strong> other fluids or foods is essential to optimize<br />

breast milk <strong>in</strong>take by the newborn. Most <strong>of</strong> the other fluids or foods are less nutritious<br />

than breast milk and therefore, if displacement occurs, the <strong>in</strong>fant may be at a nutritional<br />

disadvantage even if prepared hygienically 16-18 . In many communities, it is traditionally<br />

believed that colostrum is unhealthy and therefore is harmful to the baby. However <strong>in</strong> the<br />

present study, colostrum was given by majority (99%) <strong>of</strong> mothers which is good for the<br />

child’s health and nutrition and such desirable practices should be encouraged <strong>in</strong> the<br />

community.<br />

Breast milk can contribute significantly as a source <strong>of</strong> energy, fat, high quality<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> and micronutrients, especially when the quality <strong>of</strong> available complementary food<br />

is low (Academy <strong>of</strong> Educational Development, 1999 19 ). WHO 20 and UNICEF (1993a 21 )<br />

recommends that complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g should be <strong>in</strong>itiated immediately after 6 months<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fant’s age and breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g should be cont<strong>in</strong>ued well <strong>in</strong>to the second <strong>year</strong> <strong>of</strong> life<br />

and for longer duration, if possible. In this study, the mothers cont<strong>in</strong>ued to breastfeed for<br />

a longer duration (up to 2 <strong>year</strong>s), however undesirable complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g practices<br />

appear to be significant <strong>in</strong> the district <strong>of</strong> Morena <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation and frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

feed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g was unduly delayed. Only about 57% <strong>of</strong><br />

the 6-11 months <strong>children</strong> were gett<strong>in</strong>g complementary feeds, while only 13% started<br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g the same at the age <strong>of</strong> 6 months. The complementary foods be<strong>in</strong>g given mostly<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded cow/buffalo milk and home made semi-solids. The frequency <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g was at<br />

least 3 times <strong>in</strong> 44% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fants. Effective immunization programme aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

common communicable diseases are required for the majority <strong>of</strong> the susceptible<br />

populations particularly <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, where<strong>in</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> disability or death<br />

from preventable <strong>in</strong>fectious diseases is a matter <strong>of</strong> concern. Therefore, coverage <strong>under</strong><br />

universal immunization programme should be 100%. It has been observed <strong>in</strong> this study<br />

that majority (92.3%) were fully immunized.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


The programme for prevention <strong>of</strong> bl<strong>in</strong>dness due to vitam<strong>in</strong> A deficiency envisages<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A to all the <strong>children</strong> aged between 9-59 months,<br />

every 6 months. It was observed that about 91% <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> between 9-17 months and<br />

98% <strong>children</strong> between 18-59 months received at least one dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

previous one <strong>year</strong>. About 97-99% <strong>of</strong> 18-59 months <strong>children</strong> received the suggested two<br />

doses dur<strong>in</strong>g the preced<strong>in</strong>g one <strong>year</strong>. The coverage for iron-folic acid supplementation<br />

was very low (35%), while only 9% received ≥ 90 tablets <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g, poor coverage. Low<br />

compliance (only 2% consumed 60-90 tablets) <strong>in</strong>dicates weak education component.<br />

There is a need to strengthen the service delivery and monitor<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms for these<br />

programmes.<br />

The common morbidities such as ARI, fever and diarrhoea were reported by the<br />

mothers with the prevalence be<strong>in</strong>g higher <strong>in</strong> the younger age group (6-11 months)<br />

compared to the older age group (12-23 months). The plausible reasons for this could be<br />

due to the prevail<strong>in</strong>g undesirable <strong>in</strong>fant and young child feed<strong>in</strong>g practices coupled with<br />

non-receipt <strong>of</strong> appropriate health care management.<br />

The consumption <strong>of</strong> adequately (≥15ppm) Iodized salt was very low (15%) <strong>in</strong> the<br />

district as compared to National figure (51%) and for the State (36%) 10 .<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> status <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants and young <strong>children</strong> is not only a vital health issue, but it<br />

is also central to susta<strong>in</strong>able growth and development <strong>of</strong> the child 22 .In the present study,<br />

the prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>weight, stunt<strong>in</strong>g and wast<strong>in</strong>g was 53%, 71% and 15%.It was<br />

observed that the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> deteriorated as age advances especially<br />

from six months onwards. Undernutrition <strong>in</strong> all its three forms cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be a<br />

significant problem <strong>in</strong> the district <strong>of</strong> Morena, even though the current prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>under</strong>weight and wast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the district is considerably lower than that reported for the<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh by NFHS-3 (2006) and NNMB (2006). Probably, factors such<br />

as, the energy and nutrient density <strong>of</strong> the complementary foods given, the frequency and<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> foods <strong>of</strong>fered, hygiene aspects <strong>of</strong> food preparation, personal hygiene, the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> breast milk consumed at different stages <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>appropriate complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g and after<br />

illness may have an important contributory role for the observed high prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>under</strong>nutrition <strong>in</strong> the district.<br />

The study revealed significant association between nutritional status and different<br />

socio-economic variables, which <strong>in</strong>dicate higher rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>under</strong>nutrition <strong>in</strong> the households<br />

<strong>of</strong> vulnerable sections <strong>of</strong> society (SC & ST), among <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong> illiterate parents, <strong>children</strong><br />

from landless HHs, <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong> fathers engaged <strong>in</strong> labour, those liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> kutcha house<br />

and <strong>in</strong> households with no facility <strong>of</strong> sanitary latr<strong>in</strong>e and separate kitchen. Promotion <strong>of</strong><br />

better <strong>in</strong>fant and young child feed<strong>in</strong>g and health care practices is needed for improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the health and nutritional status <strong>of</strong> young <strong>children</strong>.<br />

Last, but not the least, there is need to strengthen programme aimed at <strong>in</strong>come<br />

generation, so as to enhance HH food and nutrition security.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


REFERENCES<br />

1. de Onis M, Blossner M, Borghi E, Frongillo EA, Morris R. Estimates <strong>of</strong> global<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> childhood <strong>under</strong>weight <strong>in</strong> 1990 and 2015. JAMA 2004; 291:2600-6.<br />

2. Black,RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA etal. Meternal and child <strong>under</strong>nutrition: global and<br />

regional exposures and health consequencies. Lancet 2008; 371: 243-260<br />

3. Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE etal. How many child deaths can we prevent this<br />

<strong>year</strong> Lancet 2003; 362: 65-71.<br />

4. Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA etal. Delayed breast feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiation<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases risk <strong>of</strong> neonatal mortality. Pediatrics 2006; 117: e380-e386.<br />

5. Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal PC, Martorell R, Ritcher L and Sachdev HS.<br />

Maternal and child <strong>under</strong>nutrition: Consequences for adult health and human<br />

capital. The Lancet 2008; 371:340-57.<br />

6. Barker DJP, Osmond C, Forsen TJ, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. Trajectories <strong>of</strong><br />

growth among <strong>children</strong>who have coronary Events as Adults. N Eng J Med 2005;<br />

353:1802-9<br />

7. Satyanarayana K., Naidu AN., Chatterjee B., Rao BSN. Body size and work<br />

output. Am. J. Cl<strong>in</strong>. Nutr. 1977; 30:322-325.<br />

8. National Nutrition Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Bureau: Report <strong>of</strong> Second Repeat Survey – Rural.<br />

NNMB Tech. Rep. No. 18, 1999.<br />

9. National Nutrition Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Bureau. Diet and nutritional status <strong>of</strong> <strong>rural</strong> population.<br />

NNMB Tech. Rep. No.24, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition (ICMR), Hyderabad, 2006<br />

10. National Family Health Survey 2005-06.<br />

11. M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development, Government <strong>of</strong> India, National Nutrition<br />

Policy, New Delhi: Department <strong>of</strong> Women and Child Development, 1993.National<br />

Plan <strong>of</strong> action<br />

12. M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development, Government <strong>of</strong> India, National Plan <strong>of</strong><br />

Action on Nutrition, New Delhi: Food and Nutrition Board, Department <strong>of</strong> Women<br />

and Child Development, 1995.<br />

13. Jelliffee D.B. <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> nutritional status <strong>of</strong> community. WHO Monograph<br />

series No.53, 1966.<br />

14. World Health Organization. Measur<strong>in</strong>g change <strong>in</strong> nutritional status, WHO, Geneva,<br />

1983.<br />

15. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards<br />

based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006; 450:76-85.<br />

16. www.who<strong>in</strong>dia.org/EIP/policy/population...<br />

17. Black RE, L<strong>in</strong>dsay HA, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, Mercedes de Onis, Majid Ezzati,<br />

Col<strong>in</strong> Mathers, Juan Rivera. Meternal and child <strong>under</strong> nutrition: Global and regional<br />

exposures and health consequences. Maternal and child <strong>under</strong> nutrition study<br />

group. The Lancet, 2008; 371:340-357.<br />

18. American Academy <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics. Breast-feed<strong>in</strong>g and the use <strong>of</strong> Human milk<br />

American Academy <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics, Work Group on Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g. Pediatr 1997;<br />

100:1035-1039.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


19. Academy <strong>of</strong> educational development. Recommended feed<strong>in</strong>g and dietary<br />

practices to improve <strong>in</strong>fant and maternal nutrition. L<strong>in</strong>kages – Improv<strong>in</strong>g nutrition<br />

and reproductive health. 1999.<br />

20. The optimal duration <strong>of</strong> exclusive breast-feed<strong>in</strong>g. Report <strong>of</strong> an Expert Consultation,<br />

WHO, Geneva, 2001.<br />

21. UNICEF. Breast feed<strong>in</strong>g facts <strong>of</strong> life. UNICEF (1993a).<br />

22. Dewey KG, He<strong>in</strong>ig MJ, Nommsen LA, Lonnerdal B. Adequacy <strong>of</strong> energy <strong>in</strong>take<br />

among breast-fed <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> the DARLING study: relationship to growth velocity,<br />

morbidity and activity levels. Davis Area Research on Lactation, Infant Nutrition<br />

and Growth. J Pediatr.1991; 119:538-47.<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


TABLES


Table - 1<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> Coverage<br />

Particulars<br />

Coverage (n)<br />

Socio-economic particulars (HHs) 400<br />

Under 5 <strong>year</strong> <strong>children</strong> for anthropometry<br />

410<br />

(Boys 240 , Girls 170)<br />

Children below 12 months 101<br />

Children 12-35 months 173<br />

Children 36-59 months 136<br />

Spot test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> HHs salt for iod<strong>in</strong>e 400<br />

Infant & young child Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Mothers with


Table - 2<br />

Socio-economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Households <strong>of</strong> Index <strong>children</strong><br />

Community<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Family<br />

Family Size<br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 400<br />

Scheduled Tribe 7.5<br />

Scheduled Caste 18.5<br />

Backward Community 42.5<br />

Others 31.5<br />

Nuclear 44.7<br />

Extended Nuclear 21.3<br />

Jo<strong>in</strong>t 34.0<br />

1 -4 26.8<br />

5 – 9 56.2<br />

≥ 10 17.0<br />

Average Family Size 6.6<br />

Literacy status <strong>of</strong> Father<br />

Literacy status <strong>of</strong> Mother<br />

Illiterate 16.8<br />

1 – 5 Class 13.5<br />

6 – 7 Class 6.5<br />

8 – 10 Class 33.4<br />

Intermediate 18.3<br />

Graduate & above 11.5<br />

Illiterate 44.6<br />

Read & write 0.3<br />

1 – 5 Class 20.5<br />

6 – 7 Class 3.3<br />

8 – 10 Class 19.8<br />

Intermediate 8.0<br />

Graduate & above 3.5<br />

(Contd….)<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 2 (Contd…)<br />

Socio-economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Households <strong>of</strong> Index <strong>children</strong><br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 400<br />

Extent <strong>of</strong> HH landhold<strong>in</strong>g (Acres)<br />

Nil 41.4<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>al farmers


Table - 3<br />

Physical facilities <strong>of</strong> the Households<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> house<br />

Particulars<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Water<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Cook<strong>in</strong>g Fuel<br />

Percent<br />

n 400<br />

Kutcha 21.3<br />

Semi Pucca 55.4<br />

Pucca 23.3<br />

Open Well 4.0<br />

Tube Well 96.0<br />

Firewood 96.5<br />

Biogas 1.0<br />

LPG 2.5<br />

Household electricity present 18.0<br />

Sanitary Latr<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Present and <strong>in</strong> use 15.8<br />

Present and not <strong>in</strong> use 4.0<br />

Absent 80.2<br />

Separate Kitchen Present 35.8<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 4<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> HHs accord<strong>in</strong>g to use <strong>of</strong> Iodized salt and iod<strong>in</strong>e content<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> salt used<br />

Iod<strong>in</strong>e content<br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 400<br />

Powdered salt 46.2<br />

Crystal Salt 16.8<br />

Rock salt 19.0<br />

Free-flow<strong>in</strong>g 18.0<br />

0 ppm 45.2<br />


Table - 6<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> last pregnancy <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> < 6 months <strong>children</strong><br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 26<br />

Undergone Antenatal check-up (ANC)<br />

Yes 69.2<br />

No 30.8<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> ANCs<br />

One 11.5<br />

Two 38.5<br />

Three 15.4<br />

Four 3.8<br />

Not availed ANC 30.8<br />

Undergone First ANC at (Weeks <strong>of</strong> gestation)<br />

≤ 8 weeks 3.8<br />

9- 12 weeks 11.5<br />

13- 16 weeks 34.7<br />

17-20 weeks 7.7<br />

>20 weeks 11.5<br />

Not availed ANC 30.8<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> ANC<br />

AWC 3.8<br />

PHC/CHC 30.8<br />

Taluk/Dist.hospital 3.8<br />

Private Cl<strong>in</strong>ic 30.8<br />

Not availed ANC 30.8<br />

ANC conducted by<br />

Medical Officer 38.4<br />

Pvt. Doctor 30.8<br />

Not availed ANC 30.8<br />

( Contd..)<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 6 (Contd…)<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> last pregnancy <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> < 6 months <strong>children</strong><br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

Components <strong>of</strong> ANC* n = 26<br />

Physical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation 69.2<br />

Weight Record<strong>in</strong>g 65.4<br />

Ur<strong>in</strong>e Test 65.4<br />

Haemoglob<strong>in</strong> Estimation 65.4<br />

Blood pressure measurement 65.4<br />

Health & Nutrition advise given dur<strong>in</strong>g ANC<br />

Yes 61.5<br />

No 7.7<br />

Not availed ANC 30.8<br />

If yes, what advise*<br />

To attend for regular checkups 61.5<br />

To consume more GLVs 61.5<br />

To consume more Vegetables & fruits 61.5<br />

To take IFA tablets for 100 days 61.5<br />

Others 7.7<br />

Reasons for not avail<strong>in</strong>g ANCs*<br />

Not aware <strong>of</strong> the need 15.3<br />

No faith 3.8<br />

No ANC held <strong>in</strong> the village 7.7<br />

Inconvenient tim<strong>in</strong>gs 3.8<br />

TT Immunization receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Yes 88.5<br />

No 11.5<br />

If yes, No. <strong>of</strong> doses<br />

One dose -<br />

Two doses 88.5<br />

Not received 11.5<br />

Reasons for not receiv<strong>in</strong>g TT *<br />

Not aware <strong>of</strong> the need 11.5<br />

* Multiple responses ( Contd..)<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 6 (Contd…)<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> last pregnancy <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> < 6 months <strong>children</strong><br />

Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 26<br />

Received IFA tablets<br />

Yes 80.8<br />

No 19.2<br />

IFA tablets received from<br />

ANM 11.5<br />

AWW 57.8<br />

Private Doctor 11.5<br />

Not received 19.2<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> IFA tablets received<br />

30-60 26.9<br />

60-90 26.9<br />

≥90 26.9<br />

Not received 19.2<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> IFA tablets consumed<br />


Table –7<br />

Particulars <strong>of</strong> last Delivery <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong>


Table - 8<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> < 60 months <strong>children</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Birth order<br />

Birth order<br />

Percent<br />

n 410<br />

First 38.0<br />

Second 31.0<br />

Third 17.3<br />

Fourth 6.6<br />

Fifth and above 7.1<br />

Table - 9<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> < 60 months <strong>children</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g sibl<strong>in</strong>gs accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval between last two births<br />

Interval between last two births(months)<br />

Percent<br />

n 254<br />


Table - 10<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong>


Table - 11<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants ( 6 months NA 33.4<br />

Not yet started 100.0 42.6<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> complementary food currently be<strong>in</strong>g given*<br />

Cow/buffalo milk NA 53.3<br />

Formula milk NA -<br />

Commercial baby foods NA 1.3<br />

Home made Semi-solids NA 26.7<br />

Home made solids NA 44.0<br />

Not yet started 100.0 42.6<br />

* Multiple responses<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table - 12<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 6-11 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Percent<br />

n 75<br />

Foods generally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> home made complementary foods*<br />

Cereals & Millets 49.3<br />

Pulses 36.0<br />

Green Leafy Vegetables 9.3<br />

Other vegetables 6.7<br />

Roots & tubers 5.3<br />

Fruits 22.7<br />

Milk & milk products 49.3<br />

Eggs 9.3<br />

Fats & Oils 38.7<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> complementary feeds per day<br />

2 13.3<br />

3 28.0<br />

4 16.0<br />

Not yet started 42.7<br />

Mode <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Mother with spoon 13.3<br />

Mother with hand 37.3<br />

Self by hand 6.7<br />

Not yet started 42.7<br />

Supervision <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

Mother 57.3<br />

Not yet started 42.7<br />

* Multiple responses<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table - 13<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 12-35 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Percent<br />

n 173<br />

Children solely breast fed -<br />

Children currently Breast fed + complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g 68.8<br />

Weaned 31.2<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

At 4 months 1.2<br />

At 5 months 9.8<br />

At 6 months 12.7<br />

At 7 months 61.8<br />

At 8 months 14.5<br />

Not yet started 0.0<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> food currently be<strong>in</strong>g given*<br />

Cow/buffalo milk 98.8<br />

Formula milk 0.6<br />

Commercial baby food 0.6<br />

Home made semi-solids 46.2<br />

Home made solids 98.3<br />

Not yet started 0.0<br />

Foods generally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> home made foods*<br />

Cereals & Millets 100.0<br />

Pulses & legumes 99.4<br />

Green Leafy Vegetables 99.4<br />

Other Vegetables 97.7<br />

Roots & Tubers 97.7<br />

Fruits 86.7<br />

Milk & milk products 97.7<br />

Eggs 13.9<br />

Flesh foods 7.5<br />

Fats & Oils 95.4<br />

Not yet started CF 0.0<br />

* Multiple responses ( Contd….)<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 13 (Contd…)<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 12-35 months Children<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Feed<strong>in</strong>g (CF) Practices<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g Practices<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> complementary feeds per day<br />

Mode <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g complementary food<br />

Supervision <strong>of</strong> complementary feed<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

Percent<br />

n 173<br />

≤2 28.3<br />

3 39.3<br />

≥4 32.4<br />

Not yet started CF 0.0<br />

Mother with hand 48.6<br />

Self by hand 51.4<br />

Not yet started CF 0.0<br />

Mother 99.4<br />

Grand parents 0.6<br />

Not yet started CF 0.0<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 14<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Care <strong>of</strong> the child and personal Hygiene<br />

Particulars<br />

Care <strong>of</strong> the child when mother goes out for work<br />

Age group (months)<br />


Table – 15<br />

Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> the Morbidity among 0- 59 months <strong>children</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

previous fortnight by age groups<br />

Age Group<br />

(months)<br />

n Fever Diarrhoea ARI<br />

At least one<br />

morbidity<br />

0-5 26 3.8 - - 3.8<br />

6-11 75 14.7 14.7 4.0 26.7<br />

12-23 78 11.5 9.0 2.6 17.9<br />

24-35 95 18.0 10.5 2.1 22.1<br />

36-47 75 20.0 12.0 4.0 25.3<br />

48-59 61 6.6 9.8 1.6 16.4<br />

Pooled 410 14.1 10.5 2.7 20.7<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table – 16<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Care <strong>of</strong> the child dur<strong>in</strong>g Sickness<br />

Particulars<br />

Personnel generally consulted dur<strong>in</strong>g illness <strong>of</strong> the child<br />

Morbidity dur<strong>in</strong>g previous fortnight<br />

Age group (months)<br />


Table - 17<br />

Participation (%) <strong>in</strong> ICDS supplementation programme<br />

(6- 59 months <strong>children</strong>)<br />

Particulars<br />

Age group (months)<br />

6-35 36-59 6-59<br />

N 248 136 384<br />

Participat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Regular 23.0 72.8 40.7<br />

Irregular 38.3 24.3 33.3<br />

Not participat<strong>in</strong>g 38.7 2.9 26.0<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table -18<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 12- 24 months <strong>children</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g to Coverage for<br />

Immunization <strong>under</strong> UIP<br />

Immunization Particulars<br />

Percent<br />

n 78<br />

Received all vacc<strong>in</strong>es ( Fully Immunized) 92.3<br />

Partially immunized 1.3<br />

Not immunized 6.4<br />

Reasons for no / <strong>in</strong>complete immunization<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

BCG 98.6<br />

DPT1 98.6<br />

DPT2 98.6<br />

DPT3 98.6<br />

OPV1 97.3<br />

OPV2 97.3<br />

OPV3 97.3<br />

Measles 97.3<br />

Not <strong>of</strong>fered 7.7<br />

Fully immunized 92.3<br />

Mother & child protection card 38.5<br />

Immunization card 6.4<br />

Parents 23.1<br />

Anganwadi record 25.6<br />

Not immunized 6.4<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table - 19<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 9- 59 months Children Accord<strong>in</strong>g to receipt <strong>of</strong> massive<br />

dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A dur<strong>in</strong>g previous one <strong>year</strong><br />

Particulars<br />

Receipt <strong>of</strong> massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> doses <strong>of</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong> A<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

Age group (months)<br />

9-17 18-35 36-59 9-59<br />

N 75 146 136 357<br />

Yes 90.7 97.9 98.5 96.6<br />

No 5.3 1.4 1.5 2.3<br />

Do not remember 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.1<br />

One 90.7 0.7 0.0 19.3<br />

Two NA 97.2 98.5 77.3<br />

Not received 5.3 1.4 1.5 2.3<br />

Do not remember 4.0 0.7 0.0 1.1<br />

Home 0.0 1.4 0.7 0.8<br />

AWC 90.7 96.5 97.8 95.8<br />

Not received/do not remember 9.3 2.1 1.5 3.4<br />

Massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A adm<strong>in</strong>istered by<br />

AWW 41.3 47.9 47.1 46.2<br />

ANM 49.3 50.0 51.4 50.4<br />

LHV 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Not received/do not remember 9.3 2.1 1.5 3.4<br />

Reasons for not receiv<strong>in</strong>g/<strong>in</strong>complete massive dose vitam<strong>in</strong> A<br />

Unaware <strong>of</strong> need 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Not <strong>of</strong>fered 2.7 0.7 0.0 0.9<br />

Time or place not convenient 2.7 1.4 1.5 1.7<br />

Mothers was busy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

Others 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


Table - 20<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 12-59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to receipt <strong>of</strong> Iron & folic acid tablets<br />

Particulars<br />

Received IFA tablets<br />

IFA tablets received from<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> IFA tablets received<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> IFA tablets consumed<br />

Age group (months)<br />

12-35 36-59 12-59<br />

n 173 136 309<br />

Yes 26.6 46.3 35.3<br />

No 73.4 53.7 64.7<br />

ANM 1.2 - 0.6<br />

AWW 25.4 46.3 34.7<br />

Not received 73.4 53.7 64.7<br />


Table - 21<br />

Prevalence (%) <strong>of</strong> nutritional deficiency signs among 0 - 59 months<br />

<strong>children</strong><br />

Cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs<br />

Age groups (Months)<br />

0-11 12-35 36-59 0-59<br />

No <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ed 101 173 136 410<br />

NAD 100.0 100.0 99.3 99.8<br />

Bitot spots - - 0.7 0.2<br />

NAD: No Abnormality Detected<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong>


n<br />

Table -22<br />

Mean Height and weight <strong>of</strong> 0-59 months Children by age group and gender<br />

BOYS<br />

GIRLS<br />

Age<br />

Height (cm) Weight (kg) n Height (cm) Weight (kg)<br />

(Months)<br />

Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD<br />

1 49.1 0.00 2.7 0.00


Table - 23<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0-59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to nutritional status by<br />

SD Classification: By Age group<br />

Underweight (Weight for Age)<br />

Age<br />

Group<br />

(months)<br />

n<br />

Severe<br />

(


Table -24<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children accord<strong>in</strong>g to nutritional status by<br />

SD Classification*: By Gender<br />

<strong>Nutritional</strong> <strong>Status</strong><br />

Gender<br />

n<br />


Table -25<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children by <strong>Nutritional</strong> status accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

SD Classification: By Socio-demographic variables<br />

Particulars<br />

n<br />

Weight for age Height for age Weight for height<br />


Table -25 (Contd...)<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children by <strong>Nutritional</strong> status accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

SD Classification: By Socio-demographic variables<br />

Particulars<br />

n<br />

Weight for age Height for age Weight for height<br />


Table – 25 (Contd…)<br />

Distribution (%) <strong>of</strong> 0- 59 months Children by <strong>Nutritional</strong> status accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

SD Classification: By Socio-demographic variables<br />

Weight for age Height for age Weight for height<br />

Particulars n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!