04.02.2015 Views

EAPC - ipac

EAPC - ipac

EAPC - ipac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

422 <strong>EAPC</strong> Abstracts<br />

minor patient has the right to know the prognosis. Conclusions: Secondary<br />

school students find NTD and APS-requests by minors more acceptable<br />

than euthanasia. Acceptability of ELD-requests varies with case characteristics,<br />

with greater support in terminal situations with irreversible pain.<br />

76 Oral Presentation<br />

Ethics<br />

Reporting of euthanasia and labeling of end-of-life practices: a<br />

study of hypothetical cases<br />

Authors: Hilde Buiting Department of Public Health Erasmus Medical<br />

Center NETHERLANDS<br />

Hans van Delden University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for<br />

Health Sciences Utrecht NETHERLANDS<br />

Paul van der Maas Erasmus MC, Department of Public Health Rotterdam<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen Vrije Universiteit Medical Center Amsterdam<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

Agnes van der Heide Erasmus MC, Department of Public Health Rotterdam<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

Judith Rietjens Erasmus MC, Department of Public Health Rotterdam<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

Background: In the Netherlands, euthanasia is defined as the deliberate<br />

ending of life at the patient’s request. Physicians are required to report<br />

euthanasia to judicial authorities in order to increase transparency and public<br />

control. However, distinguishing between euthanasia and alleviation of<br />

symptoms with hastening of death as a potential side effect, is sometimes<br />

difficult. We examined which characteristics are associated with physicians’<br />

willingness to report and the factors that contribute to physicians’<br />

labeling as euthanasia or ending of life. Methods: Design Random stratified<br />

sample of physicians (n=2100, response: 56%) Methods Physicians<br />

received a questionnaire that randomly presented three cases out of 47 and<br />

varied according to (1) type of medication, (2) physician’s intention, (3) the<br />

kind of patient request, (4) patient’s life expectancy and (4) the time until<br />

death. They were asked whether they would report this death and which<br />

term would describe the act in the presented case best. We applied a logistic<br />

regression analysis to assess the relative importance of each factor for<br />

the physicians’ choice. Results: Physicians were most willing to report<br />

cases that they labeled as euthanasia or ending of life. The factors that contributed<br />

most to physicians’ labeling as euthanasia or ending of life were the<br />

administration of muscle relaxants (OR for comparison with proportional<br />

morphine=326, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!