08.02.2015 Views

Agent Informer - National Association of Professional Allstate Agents ...

Agent Informer - National Association of Professional Allstate Agents ...

Agent Informer - National Association of Professional Allstate Agents ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NAPAA – HELPING YOU HELP YOUR CUSTOMERS<br />

PET Health Insurance Endorsed and approved by NAPAA:<br />

How many times have your customers asked about pet insurance Now <strong>Allstate</strong> agents and their customers<br />

qualify for NAPAA’s 5% <strong>Association</strong> Discount at PetPlan USA.<br />

To obtain the 5% discount, please mention or enter discount promotion code SPD20013 when you visit<br />

NAPAAUSA.org, Agency Resources, Consumer Center or when you call 1.866.467.3875<br />

<strong>Allstate</strong> Insurance Faces $60 Million Lawsuit after Restructuring<br />

June 25, 2008, Canadian Employment Law Today<br />

<strong>Allstate</strong> Canada’s attempts to cut costs by consolidating <strong>of</strong>fices has left it facing a $60 million class-action<br />

lawsuit from some <strong>of</strong> its former agents.<br />

On July 24, 2007, the insurance company announced it would be moving its 450 agents from 256<br />

neighbourhood <strong>of</strong>fices across Canada into 100 larger <strong>of</strong>fices, beginning in May 2008. Most agents weren’t<br />

pleased, particularly senior agents, some <strong>of</strong> whom ran the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong>fices as their own businesses,<br />

handling the hiring <strong>of</strong> staff and management <strong>of</strong> finances. However, under the consolidation, the 100 new<br />

<strong>of</strong>fices will be owned and run by <strong>Allstate</strong>.<br />

The consolidation also outlined significant changes to the contract terms <strong>of</strong> the agents, including taking away<br />

sales commissions on policy renewals. <strong>Allstate</strong> said it would guarantee agents’ level <strong>of</strong> pay for two years, but<br />

most didn’t bite as the changes would result in overall pay cuts for many, some by as much as 50 per cent.<br />

<strong>Agent</strong>s tried to discuss the situation with the company but it wouldn’t budge from its position. More than 70<br />

agents have since quit, though <strong>Allstate</strong> told the Toronto Star it had hired sufficient replacements. When some<br />

tried to continue working with clients as independent brokers, <strong>Allstate</strong> sued them for breaching non-compete<br />

agreements they had signed.<br />

However, in March, the Ontario Superior Court <strong>of</strong> Justice found the agreements weren’t valid, considering the<br />

way <strong>Allstate</strong> and changed their contract terms and ruled the company couldn’t enforce them. On May 20, three<br />

agents, Mark Cassels <strong>of</strong> Hamilton, along with Esther Kafka and Ken Patel <strong>of</strong> Windsor, launched a class action<br />

lawsuit on behalf <strong>of</strong> all the agents for making “substantive material changes to the employment contract terms<br />

with all <strong>of</strong> its sales agents,” which was a breach <strong>of</strong> contract and the Employment Standards Act. They also<br />

claimed <strong>Allstate</strong>’s guarantee <strong>of</strong> their level <strong>of</strong> income for two years was unlikely to be borne out.<br />

The case hasn’t been heard yet, but in the March decision that struck down the non-compete agreements, the<br />

court said there was a good chance <strong>Allstate</strong> will be found to have repudiated its employment contracts with the<br />

changes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!