08.02.2015 Views

Cut the Fat, Not the Muscle - California Correctional Peace Officers ...

Cut the Fat, Not the Muscle - California Correctional Peace Officers ...

Cut the Fat, Not the Muscle - California Correctional Peace Officers ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

R E F O R M I N G C O R R E C T I O N S<br />

<strong>Cut</strong> <strong>the</strong> fat, not <strong>the</strong> muscle.<br />

While <strong>California</strong>’s inmate population has grown by less<br />

than six percent since 2002, <strong>the</strong> Department of Corrections’<br />

administrative bureaucracy has doubled. Billions of<br />

dollars could be saved by streamlining operations, reducing<br />

bureaucratic staff and eliminating waste and inefficiency<br />

— without jeopardizing public safety or increasing <strong>the</strong><br />

dangers for prison officers and parole agents.<br />

Specifically, we propose:<br />

• Save nearly $1 billion by capping <strong>the</strong> cost of inmate<br />

health care at a level equal to <strong>the</strong> per-patient cost of<br />

MediCal coverage. Currently, <strong>California</strong> is spending<br />

nearly twice <strong>the</strong> national average providing health care<br />

for its prison inmates, which is significantly higher<br />

than <strong>the</strong> cost of care being provided MediCal patients<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> prison system. Using <strong>the</strong> standard of care<br />

and cost established by MediCal would provide significant<br />

savings for taxpayers while ensuring adequate<br />

care for inmates.<br />

• Save up to $500 million by trimming CDCR administrative<br />

staff, which has ballooned by 400 new positions<br />

in recent months and more than doubled two<br />

of <strong>the</strong> department’s administrative divisions. Since<br />

many of <strong>the</strong>se positions are focused on planning for <strong>the</strong><br />

construction of prison facilities that will not be built<br />

in <strong>the</strong> foreseeable future, <strong>the</strong>y could easily be reduced<br />

without jeopardizing prison safety or operations.<br />

• Save $580,000 by directing <strong>the</strong> CDCR to end its lease<br />

for office space in San Diego, which has sat vacant for<br />

four years, and conduct a department wide audit to<br />

identify o<strong>the</strong>r unused or under-utilized lease spaces.<br />

To taxpayers, <strong>the</strong>se empty offices are a symbol of government<br />

waste at its very worst. Taking action would send<br />

a powerful message to taxpayers that <strong>the</strong> Legislature is<br />

serious about protecting <strong>the</strong>ir money.<br />

• Save $5 billion by postponing <strong>the</strong> AB 900 prison<br />

construction and parole programs not currently<br />

in place. Given <strong>the</strong> state’s budget shortfall and <strong>the</strong><br />

precipitous decline in state revenues, delaying <strong>the</strong>se<br />

projects would be prudent.<br />

• Save at least $50 million by discontinuing furlough<br />

days in state prisons and o<strong>the</strong>r state jobs requiring<br />

24/7 staffing. Doing so would eliminate <strong>the</strong> need<br />

to pay overtime to <strong>the</strong> remaining officers, who are<br />

required to cover for <strong>the</strong> furloughed officers. Paying<br />

overtime is significantly more costly to taxpayers than<br />

filling vacant officer positions.<br />

• Save up to $30 million by filling <strong>the</strong> 500 to 1,000<br />

correctional officer positions that remain vacant.<br />

Currently, existing officers are being forced to work<br />

overtime to cover <strong>the</strong>se positions, which is far more<br />

costly than hiring additional officers.


• Save potentially hundreds of millions of dollars<br />

($20,000 per parolee) by embracing our past recommendation<br />

to expand Drug Court, Mental Health<br />

Court, Reentry Court and Revocation Court. Doing<br />

so would dramatically reduce costly parole revocations<br />

that send inmates back to prison. Without<br />

adequate pre-release preparation and post-release<br />

support, <strong>California</strong>’s recidivism rate will remain <strong>the</strong><br />

nation’s highest.<br />

• Save $3.2 million by cancelling <strong>the</strong> Paroles Division’s<br />

current contract with <strong>the</strong> Employment Development<br />

Department, which has failed in its mission to help<br />

paroled inmates find jobs.<br />

• Conduct annual performance audits to determine<br />

which parole and rehabilitation programs are achieving<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir goals. Those that are working could <strong>the</strong>n be expanded,<br />

while ineffective programs could be eliminated.<br />

Currently, this is an area of tremendous waste.<br />

These are just some of our recommendations for reducing <strong>the</strong><br />

cost and improving <strong>the</strong> efficiency of <strong>California</strong>’s correctional<br />

system. We look forward to working with you to find o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

that will help <strong>the</strong> department succeed in its fundamental<br />

mission — protecting <strong>the</strong> people of <strong>California</strong>.<br />

• Save millions by no longer providing CDCR managers<br />

and headquarters staff with state vehicles and mileage<br />

allowances for commuting to work. Cars and mileage<br />

allowances are currently being provided to about 1,000<br />

department personnel.<br />

<strong>California</strong> <strong>Correctional</strong> <strong>Peace</strong> <strong>Officers</strong> Association<br />

755 Riverpoint Drive • West Sacramento, <strong>California</strong> 95605

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!