09.02.2015 Views

Do Transitioned Athletes Compete at an Advantage or Disadvantage

Do Transitioned Athletes Compete at an Advantage or Disadvantage

Do Transitioned Athletes Compete at an Advantage or Disadvantage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tr<strong>an</strong>sitioned</strong> <strong>Athletes</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Competition 9<br />

The observed sex differences in metabolism between men <strong>an</strong>d women during exercise are<br />

not medi<strong>at</strong>ed by differences in testosterone. In fact, a recent study investig<strong>at</strong>ed substr<strong>at</strong>e<br />

utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion during exercise in men with physiological testosterone levels, abl<strong>at</strong>ed testosterone <strong>an</strong>d<br />

supraphysiological concentr<strong>at</strong>ions of testosterone <strong>an</strong>d found no differences in lipid <strong>or</strong><br />

carbohydr<strong>at</strong>e oxid<strong>at</strong>ion during exercise (13). Thus, while testosterone does appear to regul<strong>at</strong>e<br />

some of the differences between the sexes, substr<strong>at</strong>e metabolism during exercise is not one of<br />

them.<br />

4.2 Metabolic effects of estrogen<br />

The observed sex difference in metabolism during exercise is medi<strong>at</strong>ed by differences in<br />

estrogen concentr<strong>at</strong>ion between the sexes. 17-β-estradiol (E2) supplement<strong>at</strong>ion trials in <strong>an</strong>imals<br />

(16, 60, 61), <strong>an</strong>d hum<strong>an</strong>s (18, 25, 71, 89), have shown th<strong>at</strong> sh<strong>or</strong>t term administr<strong>at</strong>ion of E2 c<strong>an</strong><br />

modify fuel selection during endur<strong>an</strong>ce exercise. In <strong>an</strong>imals, E2 supplement<strong>at</strong>ion to<br />

ooph<strong>or</strong>ectomized female <strong>or</strong> male r<strong>at</strong>s spared skeletal muscle, hep<strong>at</strong>ic <strong>an</strong>d myocardial glycogen<br />

during exhaustive <strong>an</strong>d submaximal exercise, resulting in improved perf<strong>or</strong>m<strong>an</strong>ce (16, 60, 61, 70).<br />

In ammen<strong>or</strong>rheic women, 100 μg/d E2 supplement<strong>at</strong>ion f<strong>or</strong> 3 days increased free f<strong>at</strong>ty acid<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ion, decreased liver glucose utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion, with no effect on whole body lipolysis <strong>an</strong>d no<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ge in RER, carbohydr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>or</strong> f<strong>at</strong> oxid<strong>at</strong>ion (71). However, there was no effect of E2<br />

supplement<strong>at</strong>ion on perf<strong>or</strong>m<strong>an</strong>ce during a run to exhaustion <strong>at</strong> 85% VO 2peak th<strong>at</strong> was preceded by<br />

a 90 min run <strong>at</strong> 65% VO 2peak (71). E2 supplement<strong>at</strong>ion trials in men have yielded similar findings<br />

(18, 25, 89). Low dose E2 (100-300 μg/d) supplement<strong>at</strong>ion to men f<strong>or</strong> 11 days, resulting in<br />

serum estradiol concentr<strong>at</strong>ions similar to the level seen in the follicular phase of the menstrual<br />

cycle in women, had no effect on perf<strong>or</strong>m<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>or</strong> muscle glycogen utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion during a 90 min<br />

cycling bout <strong>at</strong> 60% VO 2peak ; however, there was a trend towards higher lipid <strong>an</strong>d lower<br />

carbohydr<strong>at</strong>e oxid<strong>at</strong>ion during the exercise bout (89). When the E2 dose administered to men<br />

was increased (1-3 mg/d, 8 days) RER <strong>an</strong>d carbohydr<strong>at</strong>e oxid<strong>at</strong>ion were decreased <strong>an</strong>d lipid<br />

oxid<strong>at</strong>ion increased (25). Additionally, high dose E2 lowered liver glucose utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion (18, 25)<br />

<strong>an</strong>d resting muscle glycogen content with no effect on muscle glycogen utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion (25). Lastly,<br />

similar to the findings of Ruby et al (71), there was no effect of high dose E2 supplement<strong>at</strong>ion on<br />

whole body lipolysis in men (18). To d<strong>at</strong>e, only one E2 supplement<strong>at</strong>ion trial has found <strong>an</strong> effect<br />

of E2 on whole body substr<strong>at</strong>e utiliz<strong>at</strong>ion by lowering RER <strong>an</strong>d CHO oxid<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>an</strong>d increasing<br />

lipid oxid<strong>at</strong>ion (25). It is possible th<strong>at</strong> a dose response rel<strong>at</strong>ionship exists with respect to E2 <strong>an</strong>d<br />

RER as there was no effect of low dose E2 on RER (71, 89). However, in the study conducted by<br />

Carter et al (18), serum estradiol concentr<strong>at</strong>ions were higher th<strong>an</strong> those in the Devries et al (25)<br />

study, <strong>an</strong>d yet no effect of E2 on RER was observed. One possible expl<strong>an</strong><strong>at</strong>ion could be the<br />

smaller sample size used in the study by Carter et al (18) resulting in a type II err<strong>or</strong>.<br />

Altern<strong>at</strong>ively, as E2 is known to increase IMCL content <strong>an</strong>d lipoprotein lipase activity in r<strong>at</strong>s<br />

(22, 67, 96), <strong>an</strong>d given th<strong>at</strong> there is simult<strong>an</strong>eous FFA esterific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>an</strong>d IMCL hydrolysis during<br />

exercise (40), <strong>an</strong>d th<strong>at</strong> increased IMCL synthesis would elev<strong>at</strong>e RER, it is possible th<strong>at</strong> the RER<br />

could be falsely elev<strong>at</strong>ed with E2. Theref<strong>or</strong>e, it is possible th<strong>at</strong> in the study conducted by Carter<br />

et al (18), th<strong>at</strong> the dosing regime was so high th<strong>at</strong> the effects of E2 on lipid synthesis exceeded<br />

those on lipid mobiliz<strong>at</strong>ion leading to <strong>an</strong> inability to detect <strong>an</strong> effect of E2 on lowering RER.<br />

Collectively these d<strong>at</strong>a suggest th<strong>at</strong> E2 has a primary action on liver glycogenolysis <strong>an</strong>d glucose<br />

release, while muscle glycogenolysis is not affected by sh<strong>or</strong>t term E2 supplement<strong>at</strong>ion. However,<br />

as E2 lowered muscle glycogen content (25), perhaps with time <strong>an</strong> effect of E2 on muscle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!