Monitoring panel performances with g p p the Mixed Assessor Model ...
Monitoring panel performances with g p p the Mixed Assessor Model ...
Monitoring panel performances with g p p the Mixed Assessor Model ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The <strong>Mixed</strong> <strong>Assessor</strong> <strong>Model</strong> (M. A.M.)<br />
The M.A.M. C.A.P Table<br />
Application to <strong>the</strong> SensoBase<br />
Disagreement of <strong>panel</strong> for <strong>the</strong> classical model and <strong>the</strong> MAM<br />
‣ With MAM, <strong>the</strong> disagreement effect was significant (p=0.05) 05) for 28.9% of <strong>the</strong> attributes,<br />
whereas it was 48.3% <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> classical model.<br />
Classical <strong>Model</strong><br />
MAM<br />
55.9%<br />
S<br />
S<br />
48.3% 44.1%<br />
51.7% 3.6%<br />
NS<br />
NS<br />
S<br />
1/2 significant attributes for<br />
disagreement becomes non<br />
significant.<br />
96.4% The <strong>Mixed</strong> <strong>Assessor</strong> <strong>Model</strong><br />
NS<br />
dramatically improves <strong>the</strong><br />
S : significant<br />
agreement of <strong>the</strong> <strong>panel</strong><br />
NS : not significant<br />
3 Université Sensometrics de Bourgogne, 2012 le 20 Janvier 2012<br />
<strong>Monitoring</strong> <strong>panel</strong> <strong>performances</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> M.A.M.<br />
13/15
Change language